Polymerization of SopA partition ATPase: regulation by DNA binding and SopB

In bacteria, mitotic stability of plasmids and many chromosomes depends on replicon-specific systems which comprise a centromere, a centromere-binding protein and an ATPase. Dynamic self-assembly of the ATPase appears to enable active partition of replicon copies into cell-halves, but for most ATPases (the Walker-box type) the mechanism is unknown. Also unknown is how the host cell contributes to partition. We have examined the effects of non-sequence-specific DNA on in vitro self-assembly of the SopA partition ATPase of plasmid F. SopA underwent polymerization provided ATP was present. DNA inhibited this polymerization and caused breakdown of pre-formed polymers. Centromere-binding protein SopB counteracted DNA-mediated inhibition by itself binding to and masking the DNA, as well as by stimulating polymerization directly. The results suggest that in vivo, SopB smothers DNA by spreading from sopC, allowing SopA-ATP polymerization which initiates plasmid displacement. We propose that SopB and nucleoid DNA regulate SopA polymerization and hence partition.     

Dual Role of DNA in Regulating ATP Hydrolysis by the SopA Partition Protein

In bacteria, mitotic stability of plasmids and many chromosomes depends on replicon-specific systems, which comprise a centromere, a centromere-binding protein and an ATPase. Dynamic self-assembly of the ATPase appears to enable active partition of replicon copies into cell-halves, but for Walker-box partition ATPases the molecular mechanism is unknown. ATPase activity appears to be essential for this process. DNA and centromere-binding proteins are known to stimulate the ATPase activity but molecular details of the stimulation mechanism have not been reported. We have investigated the interactions which stimulate ATP hydrolysis by the SopA partition ATPase of plasmid F. By using SopA and SopB proteins deficient in DNA binding, we have found that the intrinsic ability of SopA to hydrolyze ATP requires direct DNA binding by SopA but not by SopB. Our results show that two independent interactions of SopA act in synergy to stimulate its ATPase. SopA must interact with (i) DNA, through its ATP-dependent nonspecific DNA binding domain and (ii) SopB, which we show here to provide an arginine-finger motif. In addition, the latter interaction stimulates ATPase maximally when SopB is part of the partition complex. Hence, our data demonstrate that DNA acts on SopA in two ways, directly as nonspecific DNA and through SopB as centromeric DNA, to fully activate SopA ATP hydrolysis.Faithful segregation of low copy number plasmids in bacteria depends on partition loci, named Par. Such loci are composed of two genes, generically termed parA and parB, encoding an ATPase and a DNA-binding protein, respectively, and a cis-acting centromeric site parS (reviewed in Ref. 1). These three essential elements are sufficient for the partition process. ParBs assemble on parS to form nucleoprotein structures called partition complexes (2–6). ParA ATPases are considered to be motors that direct displacement and positioning of partition complexes inside the cell.Partition systems have been classified into two major types, distinguished by the nature of their ATPase proteins (7). Type I is characterized by Walker box ATPases, which are specified by many plasmids and most bacterial chromosomes. In some (Type Ia) the nucleotide-binding P-loop is preceded by an N-terminal regulatory domain, in the others (Type Ib) it is not. Type II specifies actin-like ATPases and is present on relatively few plasmids. It is presently the best understood system at the molecular level (8–10). However, the underlying mechanism that drives partition still remains elusive for both systems. Our work aims at the understanding of an archetypal representative of Type Ia, namely SopABC of the Escherichia coli plasmid F.The several activities of Type Ia ParA proteins are regulated by binding of adenine nucleotides (11, 12), which induce conformational changes in the proteins (13, 14). In their apo and/or ADP-bound forms these proteins display site-specific DNA binding activity, recognizing their cognate promoters through their N-terminal domains. Such activity is involved in the autoregulation of par operon expression (15, 16). In the ATP-bound form, they specifically interact with cognate partition complexes through contact with ParB proteins. The ATP-bound form of type I ParAs spontaneously forms polymers, which appear as bundled filaments in electron micrographs (12, 17–19). The role of these filaments is not understood but they could be related to the rapid movement of partition complexes in the cell. In vivo, ParA proteins form dynamic assemblies that move back and forth in the cell if the cognate ParB protein and parS centromere are present (20–23). The link between this oscillatory behavior and the segregation of partition complexes is not clear. They both require the ATPase activity of ParA proteins but the role of ATP hydrolysis in the partition process is not understood.It has long been known that ParA partition proteins exhibit low intrinsic ATPase activity (24, 25). ATP hydrolysis is modestly stimulated by either DNA or the cognate ParB alone but is strongly activated (up to 35-fold) when both DNA and ParBs are present (12, 24, 25). The lack of major stimulation of ATPase by DNA in the absence of ParB proteins has been taken to mean that the DNA-bound form of ParB is the effective activator (26). However, incorporation of centromere sites in the DNA added to ParB did not increase stimulation of ATPase (24, 25), leaving doubts as to the role of the partition complex in ATPase activation.The mechanism by which ATP hydrolysis acts in the partition process is not known for type I systems. This is in marked contrast to actin-based partition ATPases whose ATPase activity is stimulated in growing filaments (8), where it provokes the rapid disassembly of filaments unless these are capped by the cognate partition complex (9). Therefore, for the type II partition system, ATP hydrolysis ensures discrimination between unproductive filaments that are rapidly disassembled and productive filaments that drive partition complexes to opposite ends of the cell. This dynamic instability, which ensures elongation of actin-like filaments only between two partition complexes to be segregated, thus provides regulation of the partition process.Recently, it has been shown that two members of the type I ParA family, Soj of Thermus thermophilus and SopA of plasmid F, bind nonspecific DNA in the presence of ATP (12, 26). Two studies revealed that this DNA binding activity is essential for partition (27, 28). Importantly, it has been shown that a SopA mutant deficient in DNA binding no longer stimulates ATP hydrolysis efficiently, suggesting that DNA could play a direct role in the regulation of the ATPase activity (28). This finding raises the issue of the interactions required for activation of the type I partition ATPase activity by cognate proteins and DNA.In this study, we have investigated the mechanism of activation of ATP hydrolysis by SopA. First, we have found that the formation of the F partition complex is required for strong stimulation of the SopA intrinsic ATPase activity. We have also found that the partition complex and DNA stimulate ATP hydrolysis independently but that these two independent interactions act in synergy to amplify SopA ATPase activity. Lastly, we have identified an arginine finger motif in SopB responsible for the stimulation of SopA ATPase activity.     

Defining the Role of ATP Hydrolysis in Mitotic Segregation of Bacterial Plasmids

Hydrolysis of ATP by partition ATPases, although considered a key step in the segregation mechanism that assures stable inheritance of plasmids, is intrinsically very weak. The cognate centromere-binding protein (CBP), together with DNA, stimulates the ATPase to hydrolyse ATP and to undertake the relocation that incites plasmid movement, apparently confirming the need for hydrolysis in partition. However, ATP-binding alone changes ATPase conformation and properties, making it difficult to rigorously distinguish the substrate and cofactor roles of ATP in vivo. We had shown that mutation of arginines R36 and R42 in the F plasmid CBP, SopB, reduces stimulation of SopA-catalyzed ATP hydrolysis without changing SopA-SopB affinity, suggesting the role of hydrolysis could be analyzed using SopA with normal conformational responses to ATP. Here, we report that strongly reducing SopB-mediated stimulation of ATP hydrolysis results in only slight destabilization of mini-F, although the instability, as well as an increase in mini-F clustering, is proportional to the ATPase deficit. Unexpectedly, the reduced stimulation also increased the frequency of SopA relocation over the nucleoid. The increase was due to drastic shortening of the period spent by SopA at nucleoid ends; average speed of migration per se was unchanged. Reduced ATP hydrolysis was also associated with pronounced deviations in positioning of mini-F, though time-averaged positions changed only modestly. Thus, by specifically targeting SopB-stimulated ATP hydrolysis our study reveals that even at levels of ATPase which reduce the efficiency of splitting clusters and the constancy of plasmid positioning, SopB still activates SopA mobility and plasmid positioning, and sustains near wild type levels of plasmid stability.     

Purification and characterization of SopA and SopB proteins essential for F plasmid partitioning

Mini-F plasmid has the trans-acting genes sopA and sopB and the cis-acting site sopC which are essential for accurate partitioning of plasmid DNA molecules into both daughter cells. In this study, we purified independently SopA and SopB proteins, analyzed the in vitro DNA-binding activity of these proteins by the gel retardation assay, and determined the precise binding sites of DNA by the footprinting method. SopA binds to four repeated sequences (CTTTGC) located in the promoter-operator region of the sopAB operon. The SopA binding activity is enhanced by the addition of SopB protein. SopB protein itself does not bind to this DNA region. These results suggest that the complex of SopA and SopB proteins autoregulate the expression of the sopA-sopB operon. On the other hand, SopB protein binds to the sopC region, in which 12 direct repeats of 43-base pairs nucleotides exist. SopB protein recognizes the inverted repeats of 7 base pairs in each direct repeats. SopA protein does not affect the SopB binding activity to the sopC DNA segment.     

Autoregulation of the partition genes of the mini-F plasmid and the intracellular localization of their products in Escherichia coli

The sopAB operon and the sopC sequence, which acts as a centromere, are essential for stable maintenance of the mini-F plasmid. Immunoprecipitation experiments with purified SopA and SopB proteins have demonstrated that these proteins interact in vitro. Expression studies using the lacZ gene as a reporter revealed that the sopAB operon is repressed by the cooperative action of SopA and SopB. Using immunofluorescence microscopy, we found discrete fluorescent foci of SopA and SopB in cells that produce both SopA and SopB in the presence of the sopC DNA segment, but not in the absence of sopC, suggesting the SopA-SopB complex binds to sopC segments. SopA was exclusively found to colocalize with nucleoids in cells that produced only SopA, while, in the absence of SopA, SopB was distributed in the cytosolic spaces. Received: 14 July 1997 / Accepted: 3 October 1997     

Autoregulation of the partition genes of the mini-F plasmid and the intracellular localization of their products in Escherichia coli

The sopAB operon and the sopC sequence, which acts as a centromere, are essential for stable maintenance of the mini-F plasmid. Immunoprecipitation experiments with purified SopA and SopB proteins have demonstrated that these proteins interact in vitro. Expression studies using the lacZ gene as a reporter revealed that the sopAB operon is repressed by the cooperative action of SopA and SopB. Using immunofluorescence microscopy, we found discrete fluorescent foci of SopA and SopB in cells that produce both SopA and SopB in the presence of the sopC DNA segment, but not in the absence of sopC, suggesting the SopA-SopB complex binds to sopC segments. SopA was exclusively found to colocalize with nucleoids in cells that produced only SopA, while, in the absence of SopA, SopB was distributed in the cytosolic spaces.     

Disruption of the F plasmid partition complex in vivo by partition protein SopA

The SopA protein plays an essential, though so far undefined, role in partition of the mini-F plasmid but, when overproduced, it causes loss of mini-F from growing cells. Our investigation of this phenomenon has revealed that excess SopA protein reduces the linking number of mini-F. It appears to do so by disturbing the partition complex, in which SopB normally introduces local positive supercoiling upon binding to the sopC centromere, as it occurs only in plasmids carrying sopC and in the presence of SopB protein. SopA-induced reduction in linking number is not associated with altered sop promoter activity or levels of SopB protein and occurs in the absence of changes in overall supercoil density. SopA protein mutated in the ATPase nucleotide-binding site (K120Q) or lacking the presumed SopB interaction domain does not induce the reduction in linking number, suggesting that excess SopA disrupts the partition complex by interacting with SopB to remove positive supercoils in an ATP-dependent manner. Destabilization of mini-F also depends on sopC and SopB, but the K120Q mutant retains some capacity for destabilizing mini-F. SopA-induced destabilization thus appears to be complex and may involve more than one SopA activity. The results are interpreted in terms of a regulatory role for SopA in the oligomerization of SopB dimers bound to the centromere.     

Subcellular positioning of F plasmid mediated by dynamic localization of SopA and SopB

SopA, SopB proteins and the cis-acting sopC DNA region of F plasmid are essential for partitioning of the plasmid, ensuring proper subcellular positioning of the plasmid DNA molecules. We have analyzed by immunofluorescence microscopy the subcellular localization of SopA and SopB. The majority of SopB molecules formed foci, which localized frequently with F plasmid DNA molecules. The foci increased in number in proportion to the cell length. Interestingly, beside the foci formation, SopB formed a spiral structure that was dependent on SopA, which also formed a spiral structure, independent of the presence of SopB, and these two structures partially overlapped. On the basis of these results and previous biochemical studies together with our simulations, we propose a theoretical model named "the reaction-diffusion partitioning model", using reaction-diffusion equations that explain the dynamic subcellular localization of SopA and SopB proteins and the subcellular positioning of F plasmid. We hypothesized that sister copies of plasmid DNA compete with each other for sites at which SopB multimer is at the optimum concentration. The plasmid incompatibility mediated by the Sop system might be explained clearly by this hypothesis.     

Insight into F plasmid DNA segregation revealed by structures of SopB and SopB–DNA complexes

Accurate DNA segregation is essential for genome transmission. Segregation of the prototypical F plasmid requires the centromere-binding protein SopB, the NTPase SopA and the sopC centromere. SopB displays an intriguing range of DNA-binding properties essential for partition; it binds sopC to form a partition complex, which recruits SopA, and it also coats DNA to prevent non-specific SopA–DNA interactions, which inhibits SopA polymerization. To understand the myriad functions of SopB, we determined a series of SopB–DNA crystal structures. SopB does not distort its DNA site and our data suggest that SopB–sopC forms an extended rather than wrapped partition complex with the SopA-interacting domains aligned on one face. SopB is a multidomain protein, which like P1 ParB contains an all-helical DNA-binding domain that is flexibly attached to a compact (β₃–α)₂ dimer-domain. Unlike P1 ParB, the SopB dimer-domain does not bind DNA. Moreover, SopB contains a unique secondary dimerization motif that bridges between DNA duplexes. Both specific and non-specific SopB–DNA bridging structures were observed. This DNA-linking function suggests a novel mechanism for in trans DNA spreading by SopB, explaining how it might mask DNA to prevent DNA-mediated inhibition of SopA polymerization.     

Purification and characterization of the sopB gene product which is responsible for stable maintenance of mini-F plasmid

Summary The mini-F plasmid has the trans-acting sopA, sopB genes and the cis-acting sopC DNA which are essential for plasmid partitioning. In this paper, we report the purification of the sopB gene product from extracts of cells harboring a pBR322 derivative carrying the sopB gene. The purity of the final preparation was more than 95%, as determined by densitometry. The amino acid sequence of the amino-terminal region of the protein for the 17 residues identified was identical to that predicted from the DNA sequence of the sopB gene. Therefore, it was concluded that the protein was the sopB gene product. Using anti-SopB serum, the SopB protein was detected in the cell lysates of F⁺, F, and Hfr strains. The SopB protein bound to the plasmid DNA of a pBR322 derivative carrying the sopC DNA segment, but not to the vector plasmid pBR322.     

Sop proteins can cause transcriptional silencing of genes located close to the centromere sites of linear plasmid N15

Stable inheritance of bacterial chromosomes and low copy number plasmids is ensured by accurate partitioning of replicated molecules between the daughter cells at division. Partitioning of the prophage of the temperate bacteriophage N15, which exists as a linear plasmid molecule with covalently closed ends, depends on the sop locus, comprising genes sopA and sopB, as well as four centromere sites in different regions of the N15 genome essential for replication and the control of lysogeny. We found that binding of SopB to the centromere could silence centromere-proximal promoters, presumably due to subsequent polymerization of SopB along the DNA. Close to the IR4 centromere site we identified a promoter, P59, which was able to drive the expression of phage late genes encoding structural proteins of virion. We found that, following binding to IR4, the N15 Sop proteins could induce repression of this promoter. The repression depended on SopB and was enhanced in the presence of SopA. Sop-dependent silencing of centromere-proximal promoters may control gene expression in phage N15, particularly preventing undesired expression of late genes in the N15 prophage. Thus, the phage N15 sop system not only ensures plasmid partitioning but is also involved in the genetic network controlling prophage replication and the maintenance of lysogeny.     

Mapping of functional domains in F plasmid partition proteins reveals a bipartite SopB-recognition domain in SopA

Active partition of the F plasmid to dividing daughter cells is assured by interactions between proteins SopA and SopB, and a centromere, sopC. A close homologue of the sop operon is present in the linear prophage N15 and, together with sopC-like sequences, it ensures stability of this replicon. We have exploited this sequence similarity to construct hybrid sop operons with the aim of locating specific interaction determinants within the SopA and SopB proteins that are needed for partition function and for autoregulation of sopAB expression. Centromere binding was found to be specified entirely by a central 25 residue region of SopB strongly predicted to form a helix-turn-helix structure. SopB protein also carries a species-specific SopA-interaction determinant within its N-terminal 45 amino acids, and, as shown by Escherichia coli two-hybrid analysis, a dimerization domain within its C-terminal 75 (F) or 97 (N15) residues. Promoter-operator binding specificity was located within an N-terminal 66 residue region of SopA, which is predicted to contain a helix-turn-helix motif. Two other regions of SopA protein, one next to the ATPase Walker A-box, the other C-terminal, specify interaction with SopB. Yeast two-hybrid analysis indicated that these regions contact SopB directly. Evidence for the involvement of the SopA N terminus in autoinhibition of SopA function was obtained, revealing a possible new aspect of the role of SopB in SopA activation.     

Identification of a partition region carried by the plasmid QpH1 of Coxiella burnetii

Coxiella burnetii is an intracellular bacterial pathogen which causes Q fever in humans and other animals. Most of the isolates found carry plasmids which share considerable homology. Unfortunately all of these plasmids remain cryptic. Initial attempts to look for secreted or membrane proteins encoded by these plasmids using TnphoA mutagenesis revealed an open reading frame on the EcoRI-fragment C of the plasmid QpH1. Upstream DNA sequencing of the TnphoA insertions revealed a deduced peptide sequence with homology to the SopA protein which is encoded by the F plasmid in Escherichia coli. Maxi-cell analysis showed that fragment C encoded two proteins: one was 43.5 kDa in size and designated QsopA, and a second was 38 kDa in size. These proteins are similar in molecular weight to the SopA and SopB proteins, which are essential components of the partition mechanism of the F plasmid. The region appears to be conserved in plasmids QpRS, QpDV, and QpDG, but is absent in a plasmidless isolate in which plasmid sequences have integrated into the chromosomal DNA. Complementation studies demonstrated that fragment C has a plasmid partitioning function and can restore maintenance stability of the partition-defective mini-F plasmid. These data suggest that fragment C carries the plasmid partition region of the plasmid QpH1.     

DNA binding and pairing activity of OsDmc1, a recombinase from rice

A cloned cDNA corresponding to OsDMC1 from rice anther tissue was expressed in Escherichia coli. The OsDmc1 protein was largely present in the inclusion bodies of the cell lysatE., which was solubilized by 8.0 M urea containing buffeR., purified to homogeneity by Ni-CAM agarose column chromatography, followed by renaturation to its native state through stepwise dialysis against reduced concentrations of urea. The purified protein cross-reacted with anti-yeast Dmc1 antibodies. The binding efficiency observed with circular single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) was similar to that with circular double-stranded DNA (dsDNA). The binding to either DNA showed no ATP dependencE., but required 5–10 mM Mg²⁺ in the presence of ATP. Even though the protein binding to dsDNA was as efficient as it was to ssDNA, the former induced no DNA dependent ATPasE., whereas the binding to ssDNA stimulated a significant level of DNA dependent ATPase activity. OsDmc1–ssDNA complex, with its ATPase proficiency, also mediated renaturation of homologous complementary strands as well as assimilation of single strands into homologous supercoiled duplexes leading to D-loop formation. The D-loop formation was lowered by excess of OsDmc1 protein. This D-loop formation activity was promoted by non-hydrolyzable ATP analog, AMP-PNP and was not observed in absence of ATP or presence of ADP/ATP--S. These properties reflected the classical hallmarks of a recombinase and represented the first biochemical characterization of a plant Dmc1 protein.     

F plasmid partition depends on interaction of SopA with non-specific DNA

Bacterial ATPases belonging to the ParA family assure partition of their replicons by forming dynamic assemblies which move replicon copies into the new cell-halves. The mechanism underlying partition is not understood for the Walker-box ATPase class, which includes most plasmid and all chromosomal ParAs. The ATPases studied both polymerize and interact with non-specific DNA in an ATP-dependent manner. Previous work showed that in vitro, polymerization of one such ATPase, SopA of plasmid F, is inhibited by DNA, suggesting that interaction of SopA with the host nucleoid could regulate partition. In an attempt to identify amino acids in SopA that are needed for interaction with non-specific DNA, we have found that mutation of codon 340 (lysine to alanine) reduces ATP-dependent DNA binding > 100-fold and correspondingly diminishes SopA activities that depend on it: inhibition of polymer formation and persistence, stimulation of basal-level ATP hydrolysis and localization over the nucleoid. The K340A mutant retained all other SopA properties tested except plasmid stabilization; substitution of the mutant SopA for wild-type nearly abolished mini-F partition. The behaviour of this mutant indicates a causal link between interaction with the cell's non-specific DNA and promotion of the dynamic behaviour that ensures F plasmid partition.