TWO CHLOROPLAST TRANSFER RNA INTRONS FOUND IN CHAETOSPHAERIDIUM SUPPORT A MONOPHYLETIC COLEOCHAETALES

Lewandowski, J. D. & Delwiche, C. F. Cell Biology and Molecular Genetics, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742 USA The evolutionary relationships of the algal genera Mesostigma and Chaetosphaeridium to other algae and land plants are currently controversial. A close evolutionary relationship between land plants and two orders of the charophycean algae, the Charales and Coleochaetales, is supported by morphological, ultrastructural, biochemical, genomic, and phylogenetic data. A number of phylogenetic analyses support a monophyletic Coleochaetales, with Coleochaete and Chaetosphaeridum as sister groups. Mesostigma was traditionally viewed as a member of the prasinophytes and has recently been considered as a lineage possibly basal to the charophycean algae, or sister to all green algae. By contrast, recent analyses of small subunit ribosomal RNA gene sequences have been interpreted as evidence of an alternative classification with Mesostigma forming a clade with Chaetosphaeridium to the exclusion of Coleochaete and other charophycean lineages. The shared presence of introns in two chloroplast tRNA genes (tRNAAla and tRNAIle) among charophytes Coleochaete and Nitella and the liverwort Marchantia supports a monophyletic group containing the Coleochaetales, the Charales, and land plants. Through isolation and sequence analysis of the tRNAAla and tRNAIle genes in Chaetosphaeridium, we have identified introns similar in sequence and position to those found in Coleochaete. These data and the published absence of these introns in Mesostigma lend new support to a monophyletic Coleochaetales including the genera Coleochaete and Chaetosphaeridium.     

Biology and systematics of heterokont and haptophyte algae

In this paper, I review what is currently known of phylogenetic relationships of heterokont and haptophyte algae. Heterokont algae are a monophyletic group that is classified into 17 classes and represents a diverse group of marine, freshwater, and terrestrial algae. Classes are distinguished by morphology, chloroplast pigments, ultrastructural features, and gene sequence data. Electron microscopy and molecular biology have contributed significantly to our understanding of their evolutionary relationships, but even today class relationships are poorly understood. Haptophyte algae are a second monophyletic group that consists of two classes of predominately marine phytoplankton. The closest relatives of the haptophytes are currently unknown, but recent evidence indicates they may be part of a large assemblage (chromalveolates) that includes heterokont algae and other stramenopiles, alveolates, and cryptophytes. Heterokont and haptophyte algae are important primary producers in aquatic habitats, and they are probably the primary carbon source for petroleum products (crude oil, natural gas).     

The Pinguiophyceae classis nova, a new class of photosynthetic stramenopiles whose members produce large amounts of omega-3 fatty acids

The Pinguiophyceae class. nov., a new class of photo‐synthetic stramenopiles (chromophytes), is described. The class includes five monotypic genera, Glossomastix, Phaeomonas, Pinguiochrysis (type genus), Pinguio‐coccus and Polypodochrysis. These algae have an unusually high percentage of polyunsaturated fatty acids, especially 20:5 (n‐3)(EPA, eicosapentaenoic acid). These fatty acids are the basis for choosing the Latin noun ‘Pingue’ (= fat, grease) as the root for the class name. Analyses of nuclear‐encoded 18S rRNA and chloroplast‐encoded rbcL gene sequence data showed that these algae formed a monophyletic group that could not be placed in any other class. Morphologically, the species are all single‐celled microalgae from picoplanktonic size to over 40 urn in length. Each cell has one (or two) typical chloroplast(s) with a girdle lamella and a surrounding chloroplast endoplasmic reticulum. Pyrenoids occur within the chloroplast, varying from embedded to stalked, and membranes penetrate into the pyrenoid in all five genera. Phaeomonas has motile cells with two flagella, and the forward‐directed flagellum bears mastigonemes (tripartite flagellar hairs). Two other genera (Glossomastix, Polypodochrysis) produce zoospores that possess only one smooth flagellum (no mastigonemes), and this flagellum apparently is the mature flagellum, a feature previously unknown in the photosynthetic stramenopiles. The major carotenoid pigments in the pinguiophytes are fucoxanthin, violaxanthin, zeaxanthin and P‐carotene, as well as chlorophyll a and chlorophyll c‐related pigment(s). These features support recognition of the Pinguiophyceae class. nov. as a unique group of algae.     

The nature of the ancestral red alga: inferences from a cladistic analysis

A cladistic analysis of the orders of Rhodophyta is presented. Sixteen taxa and 34 characters comprise the data matrix. Included in the analysis are biochemical and ultrastructural features of pigments, cell walls, cell organelles, mitosis and pit connections as well as vegetative and reproductive characters. The traditional recognition of two classes or subclasses, Bangiophycidae and Florideophycidae, is not supported regardless of whether Porphyridiales, Rhodochaetales or Bangiales is designated the outgroup. Florideophycidae, however, appears to be monophyletic with Bangiales as its sister group. Relationships among taxa with one or two plug cap layers, i.e. Acrochaetiales, Palmariales, Corallinales, Nemaliales, Batrachospermales, Gelidiales and Hildenbrandiales are unresolved. Rhodochaetales, Bangiales and possibly Erythropeltidales are monophyletic, but Porphyridiales is polyphyletic. The class Cyanidiophyceae is not recognized and the included genera are considered to be unicellular red algae belonging to Porphyridiales. Taxa that have been proposed as sister groups for red algae, including Cyanobacteria, Cryptophyta, Glaucophyta and Chlorophyta, and Ascomycetes and Basidiomycetes are discussed in relation to the proposed phylogeny of Rhodophyta.     

POLYPHYLY OF TETRASPORALEAN GREEN ALGAE INFERRED FROM NUCLEAR SMALL-SUBUNIT RIBOSOMAL DNA

Ultrastructural studies of tetrasporalean green algae have suggested the order is polyphyletic. These features, including the absolute orientation of the flagellar apparatus and the bi- versus quadriflagellated motile cell morphology, suggest that Chaetopeltis as well as a number of others, may be ancestral to a group that includes Tetraspora. In this study, we examine the phylogenetic relationships of selected tetrasporalean taxa based on analysis of 18S ribosomal RNA gene sequences. Results show that the tetrasporalean taxa are polyphyletic. Biflagellated genera group with biflagellated volvocalean taxa, whereas the quadriflagellated species compose a distinct monophyletic clade not closely related to the biflagellated taxa. In addition, tetrasporalean taxa group with other chlorophycean algal species with similar flagellar apparatus absolute orientation, but the quadriflagellated Tetrasporales do not appear to be ancestral to the entire Chlorophyceae. These results are concordant with previous conclusions drawn from ultrastructural data and further confirm the utility of (small-subunit) ribosomal RNA gene sequences to discern green algal evolutionary relationships.     

A cladistic classification of green plants

A cladistic classification comprises strictly monophyletic taxa only. Groups such as the green algae and the gymnosperms are not monophyletic and should not be recognized taxonomically. In this proposal the green plants are recognized as a sub–kingdom, Chlorobionta. One of the divisions is Slreptophyta with some green algae and the higher plants, the latter group being recognized as a subdivision, Em–bryophylina. The (extant) higher plants consist of eight classes, one of them being Pinatae , the seed plants. The angiosperms constitute one of the subclasses, viz Mag–noliidae.     

THE PINGUIOPHYCEAE CLASSIS NOVA, CHROMOPHYTE ALGAE PRODUCING LARGE AMOUNTS OF OMEGA-3 FATTY ACIDS

The streptophytes comprise the Charophyceae sensu Mattox and Stewart (a morphologically diverse group of fresh-water green algae) and the embryophytes (land plants). Several charophycean groups are currently recognized. These include the Charales, Coleochaetales, Chlorokybales, Klebsormidiales and Zygnemophyceae (Desmidiales and Zygnematales). Recently, SSU rRNA gene sequence data allied Mesostigma viride (Prasinophyceae) with the Streptophyta. Complete chloroplast sequence data, however, placed Mesostigma sister to all green algae, not with the streptophytes. Several morphological, ultrastructural and biochemical features unite these lineages into a monophyletic group including embryophytes, but evolutionary relationships among the basal streptophytes remain ambiguous. To date, numerous studies using SSU rRNA gene sequences have yielded differing phylogenies with varying degrees of support dependent upon taxon sampling and choice of phylogenetic method. Like SSU data, chloroplast DNA sequence data have been used to examine relationships within the Charales, Coleochaetales, Zygnemophyceae and embryophytes. Representatives of all basal streptophyte lineages have not been examined using chloroplast data in a single analysis. Phylogenetic analyses were performed using DNA sequences of rbc L (the genes encoding the large subunit of rubisco) and atp B (the beta-subunit of ATPase) to examine relationships of basal streptophyte lineages. Preliminary analyses placed the branch leading to Mesostigma as the basal lineage in the Streptophyta with Chlorokybus , the sole representative of the Chlorokybales, branching next. Klebsormidiales and the enigmatic genus Entransia were sister taxa. Sister to these, the Charales, Coleochaetales, embryophytes and Zygnemophyceae formed a monophyletic group with Charales and Coleochaetales sister to each other and this clade sister to the embryophytes.     

ALGAE CONTAINING CHLOROPHYLLS a + c ARE PARAPHYLETIC: MOLECULAR EVOLUTIONARY ANALYSIS OF THE CHROMOPHYTA

Sequence comparisons of small subunit ribosomal RNA coding regions from 12 chlorophylls a + c-containing algae were used to infer phylogenetic relationships within the Chromophyta. Three chromophyte lines of descent, delineated by the Bacillariophyceae, the Phaeophyceae/Xanthophyceae, and the Chrysophyceae/Eustigmatophyceae/Synurophyceae are members of a complex evolutionary assemblage, which also includes representatives of the Oomycota (“lower” fungi). Maximum parsimony and distance matrix methods demonstrate a common evolutionary history for these lineages but their relative branching order could not be determined. Other algal species with chlorophylls a + c, including dinoflagellates and prymnesiophytes, are not members of this complex assemblage. Dinoflagellates are specifically related to apicomplexans and ciliates, and the prymnesiophyte, Emiliania huxleyi, represents an independent photosynthetic lineage that separated from other eukaryotes during the nearly simultaneous divergence of plants, animals, fungi, and a number of other protist lineages. The small subunit rRNA phylogenies of chromophytes/oomycetes were compared to those derived from comparisons of ultrastructural characters. Only tubular, tripartite mastigonemes (flagellar hairs) characterized all studied taxa of chromophytes/oomycetes as a monophyletic assemblage.     

PHYLOGENY OF THE BASAL LINEAGES OF STREPTOPHYTA BASED ON RBCL AND ATPB GENE SEQUENCE DATA

The streptophytes comprise the Charophyceae sensu Mattox and Stewart (a morphologically diverse group of fresh‐water green algae) and the embryophytes (land plants). Several charophycean groups are currently recognized. These include the Charales, Coleochaetales, Chlorokybales, Klebsormidiales and Zygnemophyceae (Desmidiales and Zygnematales). Recently, SSU rRNA gene sequence data allied Mesostigma viride (Prasinophyceae) with the Streptophyta. Complete chloroplast sequence data, however, placed Mesostigma sister to all green algae, not with the streptophytes. Several morphological, ultrastructural and biochemical features unite these lineages into a monophyletic group including embryophytes, but evolutionary relationships among the basal streptophytes remain ambiguous. To date, numerous studies using SSU rRNA gene sequences have yielded differing phylogenies with varying degrees of support dependent upon taxon sampling and choice of phylogenetic method. Like SSU data, chloroplast DNA sequence data have been used to examine relationships within the Charales, Coleochaetales, Zygnemophyceae and embryophytes. Representatives of all basal streptophyte lineages have not been examined using chloroplast data in a single analysis. Phylogenetic analyses were performed using DNA sequences of rbcL (the genes encoding the large subunit of rubisco) and atpB (the beta‐subunit of ATPase) to examine relationships of basal streptophyte lineages. Preliminary analyses placed the branch leading to Mesostigma as the basal lineage in the Streptophyta with Chlorokybus, the sole representative of the Chlorokybales, branching next. Klebsormidiales and the enigmatic genus Entransia were sister taxa. Sister to these, the Charales, Coleochaetales, embryophytes and Zygnemophyceae formed a monophyletic group with Charales and Coleochaetales sister to each other and this clade sister to the embryophytes.     

Molecular evolution of chloroplast DNA sequences

Comparative data on the evolution of chloroplast genes are reviewed. The chloroplast genome has maintained a similar structural organization over most plant taxa so far examined. Comparisons of nucleotide sequence divergence among chloroplast genes reveals marked similarity across the plant kingdom and beyond to the cyanobacteria (blue-green algae). Estimates of rates of nucleotide substitution indicate a synonymous rate of 1.1 x 10(-9) substitutions per site per year. Noncoding regions also appear to be constrained in their evolution, although addition/deletion events are common. There have also been evolutionary changes in the distribution of introns in chloroplast encoded genes. Relative to mammalian mitochondrial DNA, the chloroplast genome evolves at a conservative rate.      

The number of symbiotic origins of organelles.

Mitochondria and chloroplasts both originated from bacterial endosymbionts. The available evidence strongly supports a single origin for mitochondria and only somewhat less strongly a single, slightly later, origin for chloroplasts. The arguments and evidence that have sometimes been presented in favor of the alternative theories of the multiple or polyphyletic origins of these two organelles are evaluated and the kinds of data that are needed to test more rigorously the monophyletic theory are discussed. Although chloroplasts probably originated only once, eukaryotic algae are polyphyletic because chloroplasts have been secondarily transferred to new lineages by the permanent incorporation of a photosynthetic eukaryotic algal cell into a phagotrophic protozoan host. How often this has happened is much less clear. It is particularly unclear whether or not the chloroplasts of typical dinoflagellates and euglenoids originated in this way from a eukaryotic symbiont: their direct divergence from the ancestral chloroplast cannot be ruled out and indeed has several arguments in its favor. The evidence for and against the view that the chloroplast of the kingdom Chromista was acquired in a single endosymbiotic event is discussed. The possibility that even the chloroplast of Chlorarachnion might have been acquired during the same symbiosis that created the cryptomonad cell, if the symbiont was a primitive alga that had chlorophyll a, b and c as well as phycobilins, is also considered. An alga with such a combination of pigments might have been ancestral to all eukaryote algae.     

PHYLOGENY OF THE CONJUGATING GREEN ALGAE (ZYGNEMOPHYCEAE) BASED ON rbc L SEQUENCES

Sequences of the gene encoding the large subunit of RUBISCO (rbcL) for 30 genera in the six currently recognized families of conjugating green algae (Desmidiaceae, Gonatozygaceae, Mesotaeniaceae, Peniaceae, and Zygnemataceae) were analyzed using maximum parsimony and maximum likelihood; bootstrap replications were performed as a measure of support for clades. Other Charophyceae sensu Mattox and Stewart and representative land plants were used as outgroups. All analyses supported the monophyly of the conjugating green algae. The Desmidiales, or placoderm desmids, constitute a monophyletic group, with moderate to strong support for the four component families of this assemblage (Closteriaceae, Desmidiaceae, Gonatozygaceae, and Peniaceae). The analyses showed that the two families of Zygnematales (Mesotaeniaceae, Zygnemataceae), which have plesiomorphic, unornamented and unsegmented cell walls, are not monophyletic. However, combined taxa of these two traditional families may constitute a monophyletic group. Partitioning the data by codon position revealed no significant differences across all positions or between partitions of positions one and two versus position three. The trees resulting from parsimony analyses using first plus second positions versus third position differed only in topology of branches with poor bootstrap support. The tree derived from third positions only was more resolved than the tree derived from first and second positions. The rbcL‐based phylogeny is largely congruent with published analyses of small subunit rDNA sequences for the Zygnematales. The molecular data do not support hypotheses of monophyly for groups of extant unicellular and filamentous or colonial desmid genera exhibiting a common cell shape. A trend is evident from simple omniradiate cell shapes to taxa with lobed cell and plastid shapes, which supports the hypothesis that chloroplast shape evolved generally from simple to complex. The data imply that multicellular placoderm desmids are monophyletic. Several anomalous placements of genera were found, including the saccoderm desmid Roya in the Gonatozygaceae and the zygnematacean Entransia in the Coleochaetales. The former is strongly supported, although the latter is not, and Entransia's phylogenetic position warrants further study.     

Origins of the nucleate organisms II

A revised version of an earlier phylogenetic model for the eukaryotes is presented. It is postulated that mitosis, phagotrophy, the mitochondrion, the flagellum, sexual reproduction, and the chloroplast are so complex that it is improbable that they evolved de novo more than once. It is assumed that their distribution among existing organisms is a reflection of their order of appearance in evolutionary history. Their distribution suggests that the nucleate organisms evolved through the sequence: amoeba, amoeboflagellate, sexual amoeboflagellate, and that the chloroplast first appeared in sexual flagellates. Sequence data indicate that the sexual amoeboflagellates gave rise to a line of holozoic protozoans that culminated in the metazoans. An amoeba-metazoan line can be envisaged as representing the mainstream of eukaryote evolution. Sequence data indicate that the sexual flagellates bearing mastigonemes, the eumycetes, and the metaphytes diverged from such a line, and in that order. Cytological and biochemical data strongly suggest that the rhodophytes and metaphytes derive from a common algal ancestor, that this ancestor would have arisen from a sexual, biflagellate, holozoic protozoan lacking mastigonemes, and that it would have been closely related to the most recent monocellular ancestor of the metazoans. Sequence data indicate that the chloroplast derives from an ancestral blue-green bacterium that was originally an endosymbiont within a phagotrophic protozoan. Thus the metaphytes may be secondary in a series of organisms able to produce chlorophyll a. There is evidence that subsequently a fully developed chloroplast able to produce chlorophylls a and b was transferred by a further symbiosis to a holozoic euglenoid protozoan; the chloroplast of the euglenophytes is so similar to that of the chlorophytes, but the morphologies of these algae are so different, it was postulated that euglenophytes arose through symbiosis between a euglenid and a chlorophyte. It is proposed here that the distribution of phylogenetic features among organisms bearing mastigonemes indicates that the euglenophytes gave rise to dinophytes, cryptophytes, and all other organisms bearing mastigonemes. Thus the algae bearing mastigonemes may be tertiary in a series of organisms able to produce chlorophyll a. It is postulated that the production of chlorophyll b in algae, and the stacking of thylakoids first appeared in a line from rhodophytes to chlorophytes, and that replacement of chlorophyll b by chlorophyll c₂ occurred in a line from euglenophytes to dinophytes. To account for the presence of biliproteins in rhodophytes and cryptophytes, it is proposed that the putative transfer of the chloroplast from chlorophytes to euglenophytes occurred before a loss of biliproteins in the metaphyte line, and that the primordial euglenophytes, dinophytes, and cryptophytes were able to produce biliproteins; subsequently, biliprotein production was abandoned in all algae except rhodophytes and cryptophytes. The interrelationships of the chytrids, eumycetes, and oomycetes remain obscure. However, the model is consistent with the hypothesis that the chytrids represent ancestors to the eumycetes, and that the eumycete line and the oomycete-hyphochytrid group of fungi arose independently. The distribution of phagotrophy, biflagellate form, and sexuality suggests that the paired form of flagella first appeared in asexual amoeboflagellates, and became stabilised in sexual amoeboflagellates. The overall model is in accord with sequence evidence that the genomes of the nucleus, mitochondrion, and chloroplast derive from different genetic sources in ancestral prokaryotes, and is consistent with the hypothesis that the mitochondrion and chloroplast were acquired through endosymbioses initiated by phagotrophic inclusion of an aerobic bacterium, and a blue-green bacterium, respectively. Avenues for phylogenetic and sequence investigation for testing the model are suggested.     

DISCONTINUOUS MITOCHONDRIAL AND CHLOROPLAST LARGE SUBUNIT RIBOSOMAL RNAs AMONG GREEN ALGAE: PHYLOGENETIC IMPLICATIONS1

To provide insights into the occurrence, evolution, and phylogenetic distribution of discontinuous mitochondrial and chloroplast large subunit ribosomal RNAs (LSU rRNAs) among green algae, we surveyed 12 taxa representing three classes of green algae: the Chlorophyceae, Pleurastrophyceae, and Micromonadophyceae (sensu Mattox and Stewart 1984). We present evidence that discontinuous mitochondrial and chloroplast LSU rRNAs are quite widespread among green algae. Mitochondrial LSU rRNAs appear discontinuous in zoosporic chlorophycean lineages displaying a clockwise or directly opposed configuration in their flagellar apparatus, as well as in chlorococcalean autosporic taxa phylogenetically related to them, but are continuous among zoosporic green algal lineages with a counterclockwise flagellar apparatus configuration, as well as among chlorococcalean autosporic taxa phylogenetically related to them. Chloroplast LSU rRNAs appear discontinuous in all of the lineages investigated. Discontinuous mitochondrial LSU rRNA represents a molecular trait that might have originated at or near the base of Chlorophyceae, whereas discontinuous chloroplast LSU rRNA might have developed very early in the evolutionary history of the green algal group itself. We suggest, therefore, that the presence of discontinuous mitochondrial but not chloroplast LSU rRNA can be used as an additional character in assessing phylogenetic affiliations among green algae.     

ORIGINS AND AFFINITIES OF THE FILAMENTOUS GREEN ALGAL ORDERS CHAETOPHORALES AND OEDOGONIALES BASED ON 18S rRNA GENE SEQUENCES

The order Chaetophorales includes filamentous green algae whose taxonomic relationships to other chlorophycean orders is uncertain. Chaetophoralean taxa include filamentous species which are both branched and unbranched. Ultrastructural studies of zoospores have revealed similar flagellar apparatuses in a number of genera, including Uronema, Stigeoclonium, and Fritschiella, suggesting a close phylogenetic relationship among these taxa. The order Oedogoniales represents a second group of branched and unbranched filamentous green algae whose relationships to other chlorophycean orders also has been unclear. A possible close relationship between the Chaetophorales and Oedogoniales has been suggested. Using DNA sequences from the small-subunit ribosomal RNA gene (SSU rRNA) of several members of each order, we have examined the monophyly of the Chaetophorales and Oedogoniales, as well as the nature of their relationship to other chlorophycean orders. Our results show that chaetophoralean and oedogonialean taxa form separate monophyletic groups. Results also suggest that the two orders are not closely related to each other.     

USING rbcL SEQUENCES TO TEST HYPOTHESES OF CHLOROPLAST AND THALLUS EVOLUTION IN CONJUGATING GREEN ALGAE (ZYGNEMATALES, CHAROPHYCEAE)

Sequences for the Rubisco large subunit (rbcL) gene were used to test hypotheses about the evolution of chloroplast shape and thallus type in genera of two families of conjugating green algae (Zygnematales): the Mesotaeniaceae (saccoderm desmids, mostly unicellular) and the Zygnemataceae (strictly filamentous). Unicellular (u) and filamentous (f) genera exhibit a series of three similar chloroplast shapes: ribbonlike (e.g. Spirotaenia [u], Spirogyra [f], and Sirogonium [f], laminate (e.g. Mesotaenium [u] and Mougeotia [f]), and twin-stellate (e.g. Cylindrocystis [u] and Zygnema [f]. Two conflicting phylogenetic hypotheses have been proposed: 1) families are polyphyletic constructs drawn from three lineages, each with unicellular and filamentous taxa characterized by a specific chloroplast shape; or 2) unicells form one monophyletic lineage (Mesotaeniaceae) and filaments form another (Zygnemataceae), with some chloroplast shapes independently derived. The rbcL data strongly refute hypothesis 2 (monophyly of the two traditional families) and support hypothesis 1 in part. Parsimony, maximum likelihood, and neighbor-joining analyses of the rbcL data strongly support monophyly of a clade containing taxa with ribbonlike chloroplasts and, to a lesser extent, monophyly of a second clade of the four genera with the other two chloroplast shapes. Two saccoderm genera (Roya, curved laminate chloroplasts; Netrium, "cucumber"-shaped chloroplasts) are not members of either of these clades, but they are included in a monophyletic Zygnematales .     

Phylogenetic relationships of Salix (Salicaceae) based on rbcL sequence data

Nucleotide sequences of the chloroplast-encoded rbcL gene were used to examine phylogenetic relationships of the genus Salix together with other allied genera of the family Salicaceae. Phylogenetic analyses of rbcL sequences strongly suggest the monophyly of three commonly recognized genera (Chosenia, Salix, and Toisusu). Two monophyletic groups are recognized within the larger monophyletic group. They do not correspond with any infrageneric taxa proposed so far. With regard to character evolution, it is thought that the reduction of stamen number from more than two stamens to two might occur in at least three lineages and that fused bud scales evolved several times and/or the reverse evolution occurred from fused to free. Some types of pollen surfaces are considered to have evolved independently.     

An empirical test of the treatment of indels during optimization alignment based on the phylogeny of the genus Secale (Poaceae)

The ability of the program POY, implementing optimization alignment, to deal with major indels is explored and discussed in connection with a phylogenetic analysis of the genus Secale based on partial Adh1 sequences. The Adh1 sequences used span exon 2-4. Nearly all variation is found in intron 2 and intron 3, which form the basis for the phylogenetic analyses. Both in some ingroup and outgroup taxa intron 3 has a major duplication. Previous phylogenetic analyses have repeatedly confirmed monophyly of both Secale and Hordeum, the latter being part of the outgroup. However, optimization alignment only recovers both genera as monophyletic when knowledge of the duplication is incorporated in the analysis. The phylogenetic relationships within Secale are not clearly resolved. Subspecific taxa of Secale strictum have identical sequences and they are confined to a monophyletic group. However, the two subspecific taxa of Secale cereale do not form a monophyletic group, and the position of Secale sylvestre is uncertain.     

Higher-level systematics of Acanthaceae determined by chloroplast DNA sequences

Parsimony analyses of ndhF chloroplast gene sequences were undertaken for 15 species of Acanthaceae and nine representative outgroup species. In addition, parsimony analyses of rbcL sequences were undertaken for 12 species of Acanthaceae and the same nine outgroup species as for ndhF. The results indicate that ndhF provides more informative characters and greater systematic resolution at this hierarchical level than rbcL. The ndhF analyses demonstrate that Elytraria and Thunbergia are successive sister taxa to all Acanthaceae taxa that have retinacula and explosive fruits. These data also demonstrate that taxa with both retinacula and explosive fruits can be subdivided further into two monophyletic groups that correspond to taxa with and without cystoliths. Within the group with cystoliths three putatively monophyletic groups correspond to taxa possessing quincuncial, left contort, and ascending-cochlear corolla aestivation patterns. The results of the rbcL analysis provide less systematic resolution than ndhF but do contain several congruent arrangements of taxa within Acanthaceae.