Artificial promoters for metabolic optimization

In this article, we review some of the expression systems that are available for Metabolic Control Analysis and Metabolic Engineering, and examine their advantages and disadvantages in different contexts. In a recent approach, artificial promoters for modulating gene expression in micro-organisms were constructed using synthetic degenerated oligonucleotides. From this work, a promoter library was obtained for Lactococcus lactis, containing numerous individual promoters and covering a wide range of promoter activities. Importantly, the range of promoter activities was covered in small steps of activity change. Promoter libraries generated by this approach allow for optimization of gene expression and for experimental control analysis in a wide range of biological systems by choosing from the promoter library promoters giving, e.g., 25%, 50%, 200%, and 400% of the normal expression level of the gene in question. If the relevant variable (e.g., the flux or yield) is then measured with each of these constructs, then one can calculate the control coefficient and determine the optimal expression level. One advantage of the method is that the construct which is found to have the optimal expression level is then, in principle, ready for use in the industrial fermentation process; another advantage is that the system can be used to optimize the expression of different enzymes within the same cell.     

TATA and paused promoters active in differentiated tissues have distinct expression characteristics

Core promoter types differ in the extent to which RNA polymerase II (Pol II) pauses after initiation, but how this affects their tissue‐specific gene expression characteristics is not well understood. While promoters with Pol II pausing elements are active throughout development, TATA promoters are highly active in differentiated tissues. We therefore used a genomics approach on late‐stage Drosophila embryos to analyze the properties of promoter types. Using tissue‐specific Pol II ChIP‐seq, we found that paused promoters have high levels of paused Pol II throughout the embryo, even in tissues where the gene is not expressed, while TATA promoters only show Pol II occupancy when the gene is active. The promoter types are associated with different chromatin accessibility in ATAC‐seq data and have different expression characteristics in single‐cell RNA‐seq data. The two promoter types may therefore be optimized for different properties: paused promoters show more consistent expression when active, while TATA promoters have lower background expression when inactive. We propose that tissue‐specific genes have evolved to use two different strategies for their differential expression across tissues.     

Strategies for development of functionally equivalent promoters with minimum sequence homology for transgene expression in plants: cis-elements in a novel DNA context versus domain swapping

The cauliflower mosaic virus 35S (35S) promoter has been extensively used for the constitutive expression of transgenes in dicotyledonous plants. The repetitive use of the same promoter is known to induce transgene inactivation due to promoter homology. As a way to circumvent this problem, we tested two different strategies for the development of synthetic promoters that are functionally equivalent but have a minimum sequence homology. Such promoters can be generated by (a) introducing known cis-elements in a novel or synthetic stretch of DNA or (b) "domain swapping," wherein domains of one promoter can be replaced with functionally equivalent domains from other heterologous promoters. We evaluated the two strategies for promoter modifications using domain A (consisting of minimal promoter and subdomain A1) of the 35S promoter as a model. A set of modified 35S promoters were developed whose strength was compared with the 35S promoter per se using beta-glucuronidase as the reporter gene. Analysis of the expression of the reporter gene in transient assay system showed that domain swapping led to a significant fall in promoter activity. In contrast, promoters developed by placing cis-elements in a novel DNA context showed levels of expression comparable with that of the 35S. Two promoter constructs Mod2A1T and Mod3A1T were then designed by placing the core sequences of minimal promoter and subdomain A1 in divergent DNA sequences. Transgenics developed in tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) with the two constructs and with 35S as control were used to assess the promoter activity in different tissues of primary transformants. Mod2A1T and Mod3A1T were found to be active in all of the tissues tested, at levels comparable with that of 35S. Further, the expression of the Mod2A1T promoter in the seedlings of the T1 generation was also similar to that of the 35S promoter. The present strategy opens up the possibility of creating a set of synthetic promoters with minimum sequence homology and with expression levels comparable with the wild-type prototype by modifying sequences present between cis-elements for transgene expression in plants.     

A novel affinity gene fusion system allowing protein A-based recovery of non-immunoglobulin gene products

The capacity to produce large amounts of protein in mammalian cells is important in several contexts, including large-scale generation of biologically useful proteins, gene therapy, and transdominant genetics in cultured cells. For transdominant genetics, retroviral vectors are especially useful for delivery of expression libraries. However, even the potent CMV promoter is often unable to stimulate single-copy production of protein beyond the 1 microM level. We have adapted the HIV2/Tat expression system to retroviral vectors to boost expression above levels attainable with CMV promoters. We show that the system produces protein levels in four cell types tested which exceed levels attained by wild-type CMV or modified CMV promoters. In one cell line, the increase is 10-fold above CMV. Coupled with a stable expressed protein, levels of about 4 microM can be produced from presumptive single-copy retroviral transductants, and 30 microM from multicopy transductants.     

Comparison of promoter activity in Aleutian mink disease parvovirus, minute virus of mice, and canine parvovirus: possible role of weak promoters in the pathogenesis of Aleutian mink disease parvovirus infection.

Aleutian mink disease parvovirus (ADV) infection causes both acute and chronic disease in mink, and we have previously shown that it is the level of viral gene expression that determines the disease pattern. To study the gene regulation of ADV, we have cloned the P3 ADV and P36 ADV promoters in front of a reporter gene, the chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (CAT) gene, and analyzed these constructs by transient transfection in a feline kidney cell line and mouse NIH 3T3 cells. The genes for ADV structural proteins (VP1 and VP2) and the nonstructural proteins (NS-1, NS-2, and NS-3) were cloned into a eukaryotic expression vector, and their functions in regulation of the P3 ADV and P36 ADV promoters were examined in cotransfection experiments. The ADV NS-1 protein was able to transactivate the P36 ADV promoter and, to a lesser degree, the P3 ADV promoter. Constitutive activities of the P3 ADV and P36 ADV promoters were weaker than those of the corresponding promoters from the prototypic parvovirus minute virus of mice (MVM) and canine parvovirus (CPV). Also, the level of transactivation of the P36 ADV promoter was much lower than those of the corresponding P38 MVM and P38 CPV promoters transactivated with MVM NS-1. Moreover, the ADV NS-1 gene product could transactivate the P38 MVM promoter to higher levels than it could transactivate the P36 ADV promoter, while the P36 ADV promoter could be transactivated by MVM NS-1 and ADV NS-1 to similar levels. Taken together, these data indicated that cis-acting sequences in the P36 ADV promoter play a major role in determining the low level of transactivation observed. The P3 ADV and P4 MVM promoters could be transactivated to some degree by their respective NS-1 gene products. However, in contrast to the situation for the late promoters, switching NS-1 proteins between the two viruses was not possible. This finding may indicate a different mechanism of transactivation of the early promoters (P3 ADV and P4 MVM) compared with the late (P36 ADV and P38 MVM) promoters. In summary, the constitutive levels of expression from the ADV promoters are weaker than the levels from the corresponding promoters of MVM and CPV. Moreover, the level of NS-1-mediated transactivation of the late ADV promoter is impaired compared with the level of transactivation of the late promoters of MVM and CPV.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)     

Comparative analysis of the zeta-crystallin/quinone reductase gene in guinea pig and mouse

zeta-Crystallin is a novel nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate:quinone reductase, present at enzymatic levels in various tissues of different species, which is highly expressed in the lens of some hystricomorph rodents and camelids. We report here the complementary DNA (cDNA) cloning of zeta-crystallin from liver libraries in guinea pig (Cavia porcellus), where zeta-crystallin is highly expressed in the lens, and in the laboratory mouse (Mus musculus), where expression in the lens occurs only at enzymatic levels. A 5' untranslated sequence different from the one previously reported for the guinea pig lens cDNA was found in these clones. We also report the isolation of genomic clones including the complete guinea pig zeta-crystallin gene and the 5' region of this gene in mouse. These results show the presence of two promoters in the guinea pig zeta-crystallin gene, one responsible for expression at enzymatic levels and the other responsible for the high expression in the lens. The guinea pig lens promoter is not present in the mouse gene. This is the first example in which the recruitment of an enzyme as a lens crystallin can be explained by the acquisition of an alternative lens- specific promoter.      

Analysis of the Maize Polyubiquitin-1 Promoter Heat Shock Elements and Generation of Promoter Variants with Modified Expression Characteristics

The maize polyubiquitin-1 (Ubi-1) promoter is one of a few select promoters used to express foreign genes in monocots, such that recombinant proteins can be produced at commercially viable levels. Modifying the activity, specificity and responsiveness of such promoters provides a means to achieve desired levels and patterns of expression of genes encoding target products. Ubi-1 is constitutively expressed but is further induced by heat shock. The promoter contains two overlapping sequences with similarity to defined heat shock elements and we show that these sequences are also present upstream of the Ubi-1 homologue isolated from teosinte. Both the maize and teosinte promoters can mediate a heat shock response in transgenic maize. We have dissected the overlapping maize Ubi-1 promoter heat shock elements and demonstrate that the 3' element is required to mediate a heat shock response. The Ubi-1 promoter is particularly active in tissues consisting of rapidly dividing cells, and within the seed it is strongly biased towards driving expression in the embryo. However, replacement of the heat shock elements with a trimer of a basic domain/leucine zipper factor binding site of a pea lectin promoter shifts the balance in seed expression towards the endosperm. The Ubi-1 variants described here differ in their overall activity in the seed, but they all show potential for driving high levels of heterologous gene expression in maize.     

Pollen- and anther-specific chi promoters from petunia: tandem promoter regulation of the chiA gene.

We have analyzed the spatial and temporal activities of chalcone flavanone isomerase (chi) A and B gene promoters from petunia. To study the tandem promoter regulation of chiA, various chiA promoter fragments were fused with the beta-glucuronidase (GUS) reporter gene. Analysis of transgenic plants containing these chimeric genes provided definitive proof that the chiA coding region is regulated by two distinct promoters (designated PA1 and PA2). We also showed that both promoters can function independently and that the chiA PA1 promoter is expressed in limb (epidermal and parenchyma cells), tube (inner epidermal and parenchyma cells), seed (seed coat, endosperm, and embryo), sepal, leaf, and stem. The use of chiA and chiB promoters in the regulation of anther- and pollen-specific gene expression has been studied. By analyzing transgenic plants containing chimeric genes consisting of chiA and B promoter fragments and the GUS reporter gene, we were able to identify a 0.44-kilobase chiA PA2 promoter fragment that drives pollen-specific gene expression and a 1.75-kilobase chiB PB promoter fragment that confers anther-specific (pollen and tapetum cells) expression to the GUS gene.     

Characterization of Constitutive Promoters for piggyBac Transposon-Mediated Stable Transgene Expression in Mesenchymal Stem Cells (MSCs)

Multipotent mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) can undergo self-renewal and give rise to multi-lineages under given differentiation cues. It is frequently desirable to achieve a stable and high level of transgene expression in MSCs in order to elucidate possible molecular mechanisms through which MSC self-renewal and lineage commitment are regulated. Retroviral or lentiviral vector-mediated gene expression in MSCs usually decreases over time. Here, we choose to use the piggyBac transposon system and conduct a systematic comparison of six commonly-used constitutive promoters for their abilities to drive RFP or firefly luciferase expression in somatic HEK-293 cells and MSC iMEF cells. The analyzed promoters include three viral promoters (CMV, CMV-IVS, and SV40), one housekeeping gene promoter (UbC), and two composite promoters of viral and housekeeping gene promoters (hEFH and CAG-hEFH). CMV-derived promoters are shown to drive the highest transgene expression in HEK-293 cells, which is however significantly reduced in MSCs. Conversely, the composite promoter hEFH exhibits the highest transgene expression in MSCs whereas its promoter activity is modest in HEK-293 cells. The reduced transgene expression driven by CMV promoters in MSCs may be at least in part caused by DNA methylation, or to a lesser extent histone deacetlyation. However, the hEFH promoter is not significantly affected by these epigenetic modifications. Taken together, our results demonstrate that the hEFH composite promoter may be an ideal promoter to drive long-term and high level transgene expression using the piggyBac transposon vector in progenitor cells such as MSCs.