Further evidence that the ribosomal 30S proteins S3, S5, S9, S11, S12, and S18 possess specific 16S RNA binding sites

Summary E. coli ribosomal 16S RNA preparted by an acetic acid-urea extraction technique individually binds, in addition to the seven established proteins, 6 new 30S ribosomal proteins (S3, S5, S9, S12, S18 and S11) (Hochkeppel et al., 1976). In this communication we demonstrate the site specificity of these proteins. Binding curves of the individual proteins with acetic acid-urea 16S RNA show that the binding of all six proteins to the RNA reaches a plateau at 0.3–0.97 copies per 16S RNA molecule. No significant binding of these proteins to classical phenol extracted 16S RNA is observed, with the exception of S13 which binds 0.2 copies of protein per molecule of 16S RNA. Specificity of binding of these proteins is also demonstrated in chase experiments. The site specificity of individual [³H]-labeled 30S proteins bound to 16S RNA is tested by the addition of non-radioactive 30S total protein to the reaction mixture.     

Evidence that 16S RNA from E. coli can assume two different biologically active conformations.

We have recently shown that 16S RNA can be extracted from 30S ribosomes by an acetic acid-urea precipitation procedure which yields RNA capable of binding 13 individual ribosomal proteins. This is in contrast to phenol extracted 16S RNA which can specifically associate with only 7 proteins2-7. In the experiments reported here, we demonstrate that the difference in protein binding capacities is due to a relatiely more "open" configuration possessed by the acetic acid-urea 16S RNA. Under identical conditions, acetic acid-urea 16S RNA is more susceptible to limited T1-RNase digestion than is phenol-16S RNA. In addition, acetic acid-urea RNA shows a relatively slower electrophoretic mobility. The observable difference in conformation between the two types of RNA is lost by storage at-70 degrees C. This loss is accompanied by a reduction in protein binding capacity of the acetic acid-urea 16S RNA.     

Letter: Binding of 50 S ribosomal subunit proteins to 23 S RNA of Escherichia coli

Each of the 50 S ribosomal subunit proteins of Escherichia coli was tested independently in two laboratories for its ability to bind specifically to 23 S RNA. Four new RNA-binding proteins, L1, L3, L4 and L13 were identified in this way. Consistent with earlier work, proteins L2, L6, L16, L20, L23 and L24 were found to interact directly and independently with 23 S RNA as well. No binding of L17 was detected, however, contrary to previous reports, and the results for L19 were variable. The molar ratio of protein and RNA in each complex was measured at saturation. Significant differences in binding stoichiometry were noted among the various proteins. In addition, saturation levels were found to be influenced by the state of both the RNA and the proteins.     

RNA-protein interactions in the ribosome. II. Binding of ribosomal proteins to isolated fragments of the 16 S RNA

Specific fragments of the 16 S ribosomal RNA of Escherichia coli have been isolated and tested for their ability to interact with proteins of the 30 S ribosomal subunit. The 12 S RNA, a 900-nucleotide fragment derived from the 5′-terminal portion of the 16 S RNA, was shown to form specific complexes with proteins S4, S8, S15, and S20. The stoichiometry of binding at saturation was determined in each case. Interaction between the 12 S RNA and protein fraction $\text{S}\text{16}\text{S}\text{17}$ was detected in the presence of S4, S8, S15 and S20; only these proteins were able to bind to this fragment, even when all 21 proteins of the 30 S subunit were added to the reaction mixture. Protein S4 also interacted specifically with the 9 S RNA, a fragment of 500 nucleotides that corresponds to the 5′-terminal third of the 16 S RNA, and protein S15 bound independently to the 4 S RNA, a fragment containing 140 nucleotides situated toward the middle of the RNA molecule. None of the proteins interacted with the 600-nucleotide 8 S fragment that arose from the 3′-end of the 16 S RNA.When the 16 S RNA was incubated with an unfractionated mixture of 30 S subunit proteins at 0 °C, 10 to 12 of the proteins interacted with the ribosomal RNA to form the reconstitution intermediate (RI) particle. Limited hydrolysis of this particle with T₁ ribonuclease yielded 14 S and 8 S subparticles whose RNA components were indistinguishable from the 12 S and 8 S RNAs isolated from digests of free 16 S RNA. The 14 S subparticle contained proteins S6 and S18 in addition to the RNA-binding proteins S4, S8, S15, S20 and $\text{S}\text{16}\text{S}\text{17}$. The 8 S subparticle contained proteins S7, S9, S13 and S19. These findings serve to localize the sites at which proteins incapable of independent interaction with 16 S RNA are fixed during the early stages of 30 S subunit assembly.     

Identification of proteins functionally altered by chemical modification of the transfer RNA and polyuridylic acid binding sites of 30 S ribosomal subunits

Previous studies have shown that Rose Bengal-sensitized photo-oxidation of 30 S ribosomal subunits causes inactivation of tRNA binding and partial loss of poly(U) binding activities (Noller et al., 1971). The present studies, reconstitution of 30 S subunits from 16 S RNA, total protein from modified subunits, and purified proteins from untreated subunits, show that proteins S2 and S3 together completely restore these activities to the reconstituted subunits. The modified proteins are capable of in vitro assembly, and give rise to particles with normal sedimentation constants, showing that restoration of activity is not simply due to correction of an assembly defect.Protein S3 restores poly(U) binding and tRNA binding to the same extent, accounting for the lowered mRNA binding activity of the modified particles as well as a corresponding fraction of the tRNA binding activity. Protein S2 restores the remaining fraction of the tRNA binding activity, but has no effect on poly (U) binding. In 50 S-stimulated tRNA binding, proteins S1 and S5 are required in addition to S2 and S3 for full activity.     

Studies on the role of amino acid residues 31 through 46 of ribosomal protein S4 in the mechanism of 30 S ribosome assembly.

We have described previously the isolation of a large fragment of 30 S ribosomal protein S4 (Changchien &; Craven, 1976). This S4-fragment is produced by the digestion of the S4–16S RNA complex with trypsin and it retains a full capacity to associate specifically with 16S RNA. It was also demonstrated that the S4-fragment has approximately 46 amino acid residues missing from the N-terminus and an intact C-terminus (also shown by Newberry et al., 1977). Preliminary experiments with this S4-fragment indicated that it could not fully replace the intact protein S4 in the process of 30 S ribosome assembly in vitro.We have also recently reported (Changchien et al., 1978) the preparation of a new fragment of protein S4 which has only 30 amino acid residues cleaved from the N-terminus. This was achieved by the use of the reagent 2-nitro-5-thiocyanobenzoic acid which selectively modifies the cysteine residue at position 31 followed by a cleavage of the adjacent peptide bond.We have now fully characterized the capacity of these two fragments, S4-fragment (47–203) and S4-fragment(31–203), to participate in the 30 S ribosome assembly process in vitro. Using 2-dimensional polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, we find that when S4-fragment(47–203) is a component of the in vitro assembly reaction, proteins S1, S2, S10, S18 and S21 fail to become incorporated into the final particle. In contrast, S4-fragment(31–203) appears to participate in the reconstitution reaction without impairment allowing the complete incorporation of all 20 proteins of the 30 S subunit. The resultant particle, containing the S4-fragment (31–203), is fully active in the binding of poly(U), but is completely inactive for non-enzymatic poly(U)-directed binding of Phe-tRNA (Changchien et al., 1978). These results suggest that residues 1 through 30 of protein S4 are not involved in the assembly of the 30 S ribosome, but are required for the proper construction of the tRNA binding site. In addition residues 31 through 46 must be somehow critically important for the assembly of proteins S1, S2, S10, S18 and S21. We present evidence to show that the absence of residues 31 through 46 of protein S4 prevents a conformational change in the structure of 16 S RNA which normally accompanies the RI to RI transition and that this results in the inability of these proteins to participate in the assembly process.     

Preliminary x-ray diffraction data for tetragonal crystals of trypsinized Escherichia coli elongation factor.

Previous studies (Craven et al., 1974) demonstrated that the capacity of ribosomal proteins to be chemically modified by iodine is extensively reduced when they are members of an intact ribosome. We have attempted to exploit this observation by analyzing in detail the alterations in the iodine accessibility of the individual 30 S ribosomal proteins. We have prepared a total of 38 different complexes between 16 S RNA and mixtures of individual purified 30 S ribosomal proteins. Eighteen of the 21 30 S proteins were used in the formation of these complexes. Comparison of the iodination patterns obtained for the various proteins derived from different complexes has revealed that sometimes a specific protein can selectively alter the chemical reactivity of another protein in the complex. We have found 30 different examples of protein pairs in which one protein effectively protects another protein from chemical iodination.     

RNA--protein interactions in the ribosome. IV. Structure and properties of binding sites for proteins S4, S16/S17 and S20 in the 16S RNA

Proteins S4, S16/S17 and S20 of the 30 S ribosomal subunit of Escherichia coli+ associate with specific binding sites in the 16 S ribosomal RNA. A systematic investigation of the co-operative interactions that occur when two or more of these proteins simultaneously attach to the 16 S RNA indicate that their binding sites lie near to one another. The binding site for S4 has previously been located within a 550-nucleotide RNA fragment of approximately 9 S that arises from the 5′-terminal portion of the 16 S RNA upon limited hydrolysis with pancreatic ribonuclease. The 9 S RNA was unable to associate with S20 and S16/S17, however, either alone or in combination. A fragment of similar size and nucleotide sequence, termed the 9 S¹ RNA, has been isolated following ribonuclease digestion of the complex of 16 S RNA with S20 and S16/S17. The 9 S¹ RNA bound not only S4, but S20 and S16/S17 as well, although the fragment complex was stable only when both of the latter protein fractions were present together. Nonetheless, measurements of binding stoichiometry demonstrated the interactions to be specific under these conditions. A comparison of the 9 S and 9 S¹ RNAs by electrophoresis in polyacrylamide gels containing urea revealed that the two fragments differ substantially in the number and distribution of hidden breaks. Contrary to expectation, the RNA in the ribonucleoprotein complex appeared to be more accessible to ribonuclease than the free 16 S RNA as judged by the smaller average length of the sub-fragments recovered from the 9 S¹ RNA. These results suggest that the binding of S4, S16/S17 and S20 brings about a conformational alteration within the 5′ third of the 16 S RNA.To delineate further the portions of the RNA chain that interact with S4, S16/S17 and S20, specific fragments encompassing subsequences from the 5′ third of the 16 S RNA were sought. Two such fragments, designated 12 S-I and 12 S-II, were purified by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis from partial T₁ ribonuclease digests of the 16 S RNA. The two RNAs, which contain 290 and 210 nucleotides, respectively, are contiguous and together span the entire 5′-terminal 500 residues of the 16 S RNA molecule. When tested individually, neither 12 S-I nor 12 S-II bound S4, S16/S17 or S20. If heated together at 40 °C in the presence of Mg²⁺ ions, however, the two fragments together formed an 8 S complex which associated with S4 alone, with S16/S17 + S20 in combination, and with S4 + S16/S17 + S20 when incubated with an un fractionated mixture of 30 S subunit proteins. These results imply that each fragment contains part of the corresponding binding sites.     

Neutron-scattering studies of the ribosome of Escherichia coli: a provisional map of the locations of proteins S3, S4, S5, S7, S8 and S9 in the 30 S subunit.

Results of neutron-scattering experiments to determine the distances between seven pairs of proteins within the 30 S ribosomal subunit are presented. These results, combined with earlier data (Engelman et al., 1975; Moore et al., 1977) lead to the construction of a three-dimensional map of the positions of the centers of mass of proteins S3, S4, S5, S7, S8 and S9. The properties of this map and its relationship to other information on the structure of the 30 S subunit are discussed.     

Global Stabilization of rRNA Structure by Ribosomal Proteins S4, S17, and S20

Ribosomal proteins stabilize the folded structure of the ribosomal RNA and enable the recruitment of further proteins to the complex. Quantitative hydroxyl radical footprinting was used to measure the extent to which three different primary assembly proteins, S4, S17, and S20, stabilize the three-dimensional structure of the Escherichia coli 16S 5′ domain. The stability of the complexes was perturbed by varying the concentration of MgCl₂. Each protein influences the stability of the ribosomal RNA tertiary interactions beyond its immediate binding site. S4 and S17 stabilize the entire 5′ domain, while S20 has a more local effect. Multistage folding of individual helices within the 5′ domain shows that each protein stabilizes a different ensemble of structural intermediates that include nonnative interactions at low Mg²⁺ concentration. We propose that the combined interactions of S4, S17, and S20 with different helical junctions bias the free-energy landscape toward a few RNA conformations that are competent to add the secondary assembly protein S16 in the next step of assembly.     

RNA-protein interactions in the ribosome. I. Characterization and ribonuclease digestion of 16 S RNA-ribosomal protein complexes

Proteins from the 30 S ribosomal subunit of Escherichia coli were fractionated by column chromatography and individually incubated with 16 S ribosomal RNA. Stable and specific complexes were formed between proteins S4, S7, S8, S15 and S20, and the 16 S RNA. Protein S13 and one or both proteins of the $\text{S}\text{16}\text{S}\text{17}$ mixture bound more weakly to the RNA, although these interactions too were apparently specific. The binding of $\text{S}\text{16}\text{S}\text{17}$ was found to be markedly stimulated by proteins S4, S8, S15 and S20. Limited digestion of the RNA-protein complexes with T₁ or pancreatic ribonucleases yielded a variety of partially overlapping RNA fragments, which retained one or more of the proteins. Since similar fragments were recovered when 16 S RNA alone was digested under the same conditions, their stability could not be accounted for by the presence of bound protein. The integrity of the fragments was, however, strongly influenced by the magnesium ion concentration at which ribonuclease digestion was carried out. Each of the RNA fragments was characterized by fingerprinting and positioned within the sequence of the 1600-nucleotide 16 S RNA molecule. The location of ribosomal protein binding sites was delimited by the pattern of fragments to which a given protein bound. The binding sites for proteins S4, S8, S15, S20 and, possibly, S13 and $\text{S}\text{16}\text{S}\text{17}$ as well, lie within the 5′-terminal half of the 16 S RNA molecule. In particular, the S4 binding site was localized to the first 500 nucleotides of this sequence while that for S15 lies within a 140-nucleotide sequence starting about 600 nucleotides from the 5′-terminus. The binding site for the protein S7 lies between 900 and 1500 nucleotides from the 5′-terminus of the ribosomal RNA.     

Structures of complexes of 5S RNA with ribosomal proteins L5, L18 and L25 from Escherichia coli: identification of kethoxal-reactive sites on the 5S RNA.

The topography of Escherichia coli 5S RNA has been examined in the presence of ribosomal proteins L5, L18 and L25 and their different combinations, by comparing the kethoxal modification characteristics of the various RNA-protein complexes with those of the free A-conformer of 5S RNA (Noller &; Garrett, 1979, accompanying paper).Two of the four most reactive guanines, G₁₃ and G₄₁, are unaffected by the protein, in accord with the finding that these are the only two guanines that are accessible in the 50S subunit (Noller &; Herr, 1974). The other two very reactive guanines, G₂₄ and G₆₉, are strongly protected by protein L18, either in the presence or absence of proteins L5 and L25. Protein binding studies with kethoxal-modified 5S RNA provide evidence that one or both of these two guanines are directly involved in the protein-RNA interactions, and this conclusion is supported by the occurrence of guanines in these two positions in all the other sequenced prokaryotic 5S RNAs.The group of less reactive guanines, G₁₆, G₂₃, G₄₄, G₈₆ and G₁₀₇, are protected to some extent by each of the proteins L5, L18 and L25; the strongest effect is with L18. We suggest that this is attributable to a small increase in the conformational homogeneity of the 5S RNA and that L18, in particular, induces some tightening of the RNA structure.Only one guanine, G₆₉, is rendered more accessible by the proteins. This effect is produced by protein L25, which is known to cause some destructuring of the 5S RNA (Bear et al., 1977). There was no other evidence for any destructuring of the 5S RNA. In particular, the sequence 72 to 83, which is complementary to a sequence in 23S RNA (Herr &; Noller, 1975), is not modified. However, in contrast to an earlier report (Erdmann et al., 1973), the conserved sequence G₄₄-A-A-C, which has been implicated in tRNA binding, was not rendered more accessible by the proteins.     

Efficient reconstitution of functional Escherichia coli 30S ribosomal subunits from a complete set of recombinant small subunit ribosomal proteins.

Previous studies have shown that the 30S ribosomal subunit of Escherichia coli can be reconstituted in vitro from individually purified ribosomal proteins and 16S ribosomal RNA, which were isolated from natural 30S subunits. We have developed a 30S subunit reconstitution system that uses only recombinant ribosomal protein components. The genes encoding E. coli ribosomal proteins S2-S21 were cloned, and all twenty of the individual proteins were overexpressed and purified. Reconstitution, following standard procedures, using the complete set of recombinant proteins and purified 16S ribosomal RNA is highly inefficient. Efficient reconstitution of 30S subunits using these components requires sequential addition of proteins, following either the 30S subunit assembly map (Mizushima & Nomura, 1970, Nature 226:1214-1218; Held et al., 1974, J Biol Chem 249:3103-3111) or following the order of protein assembly predicted from in vitro assembly kinetics (Powers et al., 1993, J MoI Biol 232:362-374). In the first procedure, the proteins were divided into three groups, Group I (S4, S7, S8, S15, S17, and S20), Group II (S5, S6, S9, Sll, S12, S13, S16, S18, and S19), and Group III (S2, S3, S10, S14, and S21), which were sequentially added to 16S rRNA with a 20 min incubation at 42 degrees C following the addition of each group. In the second procedure, the proteins were divided into Group I (S4, S6, S11, S15, S16, S17, S18, and S20), Group II (S7, S8, S9, S13, and S19), Group II' (S5 and S12) and Group III (S2, S3, S10, S14, and S21). Similarly efficient reconstitution is observed whether the proteins are grouped according to the assembly map or according to the results of in vitro 30S subunit assembly kinetics. Although reconstitution of 30S subunits using the recombinant proteins is slightly less efficient than reconstitution using a mixture of total proteins isolated from 30S subunits, it is much more efficient than reconstitution using proteins that were individually isolated from ribosomes. Particles reconstituted from the recombinant proteins sediment at 30S in sucrose gradients, bind tRNA in a template-dependent manner, and associate with 50S subunits to form 70S ribosomes that are active in poly(U)-directed polyphenylalanine synthesis. Both the protein composition and the dimethyl sulfate modification pattern of 16S ribosomal RNA are similar for 30S subunits reconstituted with either recombinant proteins or proteins isolated as a mixture from ribosomal subunits as well as for natural 30S subunits.     

A protein-nucleic acid crosslink in 30S ribosomes

The data indicate that probably a single 30s ribosomal protein has been crosslinked to the 3′-ribosyl terminus of 16s RNA in intact 30s ribosomes. The crosslink was made by oxidizing the 3′-ribosyl moiety of 16s RNA to a dialdehyde with NaIO₄. One of the aldehyde groups generated in the oxidation reacted with an α- or ε-amino group of an adjacent protein to form a Schiff's base. The Schiff's base was reduced with NaBH₄ to a stable, specific covalent crosslink between the protein and the 16s RNA molecules. The crosslinked protein was tentatively identified as S1 according to the nomenclature of Wittmann et al. (1971), Mol. Gen. Genetics 111, 327.     

Significant changes in 16 S RNA conformation accompanying assembly of the 30 S ribosome in vitro

Our previous studies have shown that 16 S RNA can assume two different conformational forms as detected by agarose gel electrophoresis, and that these two forms vary in their ability to bind individual 30 S ribosomal proteins specifically. In this paper we show that the faster electrophoretic form can be converted to the slower electrophoretic form by the binding of either protein S4, S8, S7 or S15. The slower form can then be transformed into a fast form by heat-activating the reconstitution intermediate (RI) particle, which has been constructed under reconstitution conditions at 0 °C, to RI¹. We demonstrate that the transformation of the 16 S RNA conformation by binding of protein S7 permits the subsequent binding of protein S9 following deproteination. We propose that many of the classical assembly-dependent relationships are due to induced changes in the 16 S RNA conformation.     

Stabilization of 30 S ribosomal subunits of Bacillus subtilis W168 by spermidine and magnesium ions

An explanation for the fragility of 30 S ribosomal subunits of Bacillus subtilis has been studied. Degradation of 16 S ribosomal RNA, rather than degradation of ribosomal proteins, was found to cause the inactivation of 30 S subunits. Although RNAases were bound specifically to 30 S ribosomal subunits, the RNAases were able to function. Spermidine was found to contribute to the stabilization of 30 S ribosomal subunits by inhibiting the degradation of 16 S ribosomal RNA. A high concentration of Mg²⁺ also stabilized the 30 S ribosomal subunits of Bacillus subtilis. The polypeptide synthetic activity of 30 S ribosomal subunits prepared in the presence of spermidine was at least 4-times greater than that of 30 S ribosomal subunits prepared in the absence of spermidine; this activity was maintained without any loss for 3 months at ?70°C.     

Neutron scattering study of the 13 S fragment of 16 S RNA and its complex with ribosomal protein S4

A fragment with a molecular weight of 170,000 and a sedimentation coefficient of 13 S which is capable of specifically binding ribosomal protein S4 has been obtained by digestion of Escherichia coli 16 S RNA with ribonuclease A. The 13 S fragment of 16 S RNA and its complex with protein S4 have been studied by different physical methods; in the first place, by neutron scattering. It has been shown that this fragment is very compact in solution. The radii of gyration of this fragment (50 ± 3 Å) and of protein S4 within the complex (17 ± 3 Å) coincide, within the limits of experimental error, with the radii of gyration for the free RNA fragment (47 ± 2 Å) and the free ribosomal protein S4 in solution (18 ± 2 Å). Hence the conclusion is drawn that the compactness of the RNA fragment and the ribosomal protein does not change on complex formation. The compact 13 S fragment of 16 S RNA is shown to be contrast-matched in solvent containing 70% ²H₂O which corresponds to a value for the partial specific volume of RNA of 0.537 cm³/g.     

Molecular interactions of ribosomal components

Summary The site-specific complex formed between 16S RNA and the 30S ribosomal protein S4 from Escherichia coli has been degraded with pancreatic ribonuclease. We have recovered the nuclease-resistant RNA from this complex; we call it S4aR. S4aR will bind to S4, but it will not bind to the other 30S proteins that can form site-specific complexes with 16S RNA. The data presented here as well as elsewhere (Schaup et al., 1971b) show that S4aR has a mass of about 150000 daltons and that it is made up of several separate RNA fragments, each of which enters the complex with S4. We conclude that S4 interacts with several separate binding sites on the RNA and that these probably contain a great deal of double stranded structure.