Histones from exponential and stationary L-cells. Evidence for metabolic heterogeneity of histone fractions retained after isolation of nuclei

Histones of exponential and G₁-arrested mouse L-cells were double-labeled with either [³H]lysine and [³²P]phosphate or with [¹⁴C]arginine and [³H]acetate in order to investigate cell cycle-dependent changes in rates of synthesis and metabolic modifications as well as the effect of the method of nuclear isolation on retention of the labeled fractions. Results indicate that newly synthesized lysine-rich histones incorporate ³²P at the highest rate. However, phosphorylation can also be detected in G₁-arrested cells and in the case of F_2b, F_1⁰, and F_1¹, with no detectable new synthesis.On the other hand, acetylation proceeded at similar rates in both exponential and stationary cells with the exception of F_{2a 2} and F₃ which showed higher acetylation levels in the latter.In relation to the method used for nuclear isolation, we observed that, even in cases where no difference in the relative amount of a given histone could be detected, the species recovered were not identical. We conclude that none of the methods commonly employed retains all of the histones. In general, the acetylated species appear to be best preserved at a higher divalent cation concentration while the newly synthesized ones are better conserved at lower ionic strengths.     

Establishment of Histone Modifications after Chromatin Assembly

Every cell has to duplicate its entire genome during S-phase of the cell cycle. After replication, the newly synthesized DNA is rapidly assembled into chromatin. The newly assembled chromatin ‘matures’ and adopts a variety of different conformations. This differential packaging of DNA plays an important role for the maintenance of gene expression patterns and has to be reliably copied in each cell division. Posttranslational histone modifications are prime candidates for the regulation of the chromatin structure. In order to understand the maintenance of chromatin structures, it is crucial to understand the replication of histone modification patterns. To study the kinetics of histone modifications in vivo, we have pulse-labeled synchronized cells with an isotopically labeled arginine (¹⁵N₄) that is 4 Da heavier than the naturally occurring ¹⁴N₄ isoform. As most of the histone synthesis is coupled with replication, the cells were arrested at the G1/S boundary, released into S-phase and simultaneously incubated in the medium containing heavy arginine, thus labeling all newly synthesized proteins. This method allows a comparison of modification patterns on parental versus newly deposited histones. Experiments using various pulse/chase times show that particular modifications have considerably different kinetics until they have acquired a modification pattern indistinguishable from the parental histones.     

Dynamic Acetylation of All Lysine 4–Methylated Histone H3 in the Mouse Nucleus: Analysis at c-fos and c-jun

A major focus of current research into gene induction relates to chromatin and nucleosomal regulation, especially the significance of multiple histone modifications such as phosphorylation, acetylation, and methylation during this process. We have discovered a novel physiological characteristic of all lysine 4 (K4)–methylated histone H3 in the mouse nucleus, distinguishing it from lysine 9–methylated H3. K4-methylated histone H3 is subject to continuous dynamic turnover of acetylation, whereas lysine 9–methylated H3 is not. We have previously reported dynamic histone H3 phosphorylation and acetylation as a key characteristic of the inducible proto-oncogenes c-fos and c-jun. We show here that dynamically acetylated histone H3 at these genes is also K4-methylated. Although all three modifications are proven to co-exist on the same nucleosome at these genes, phosphorylation and acetylation appear transiently during gene induction, whereas K4 methylation remains detectable throughout this process. Finally, we address the functional significance of the turnover of histone acetylation on the process of gene induction. We find that inhibition of turnover, despite causing enhanced histone acetylation at these genes, produces immediate inhibition of gene induction. These data show that all K4-methylated histone H3 is subject to the continuous action of HATs and HDACs, and indicates that at c-fos and c-jun, contrary to the predominant model, turnover and not stably enhanced acetylation is relevant for efficient gene induction.     

Dynamic acetylation of all lysine 4-methylated histone H3 in the mouse nucleus: analysis at c-fos and c-jun

A major focus of current research into gene induction relates to chromatin and nucleosomal regulation, especially the significance of multiple histone modifications such as phosphorylation, acetylation, and methylation during this process. We have discovered a novel physiological characteristic of all lysine 4 (K4)–methylated histone H3 in the mouse nucleus, distinguishing it from lysine 9–methylated H3. K4-methylated histone H3 is subject to continuous dynamic turnover of acetylation, whereas lysine 9–methylated H3 is not. We have previously reported dynamic histone H3 phosphorylation and acetylation as a key characteristic of the inducible proto-oncogenes c-fos and c-jun. We show here that dynamically acetylated histone H3 at these genes is also K4-methylated. Although all three modifications are proven to co-exist on the same nucleosome at these genes, phosphorylation and acetylation appear transiently during gene induction, whereas K4 methylation remains detectable throughout this process. Finally, we address the functional significance of the turnover of histone acetylation on the process of gene induction. We find that inhibition of turnover, despite causing enhanced histone acetylation at these genes, produces immediate inhibition of gene induction. These data show that all K4-methylated histone H3 is subject to the continuous action of HATs and HDACs, and indicates that at c-fos and c-jun, contrary to the predominant model, turnover and not stably enhanced acetylation is relevant for efficient gene induction.     

The metabolism of histone fractions. VI. Differences in the phosphorylation of histone fractions during the cell cycle

Phosphorylation of histone fractions in the presence and absence of DNA synthesis was measured using the new “isoleucine-limiting” method for synchronizing Chinese hamster cells in early G₁-phase. Using preparative electrophoresis, histone f1 phosphorylation was found to be dependent upon cell-cycle position, being absent in G₁-arrested and G₁-traversing cells and active in the S-phase. The absence of f1 phosphorylation in G₁-arrested cells, which are known to exhibit f1 turnover, indicates that f1 phosphorylation is not an obligatory part of the f1 turnover process. In contrast to histone f1, it was found that histone f2a2 phosphorylation is independent of cell-cycle position, occurring with equal magnitude in the G₁-traversing state when DNA synthesis is essentially absent and in the S-phase when DNA synthesis is active. When cells were arrested in the G₁-state by isoleucine deprivation, f2a2 phosphorylation continued to be active, occurring at 56% of the rate observed in the G₁-traversing state. These results indicate that phosphorylation of histone f2a2 is independent of f2a2 synthesis, independent of DNA synthesis, and independent of histone f1 phosphorylation. Because f2a2 is actively phosphorylated in G₁-arrested cells known to be active in the synthesis of various types of RNA (including messenger) as well as in G₁-traversing and S-phase cells, we feel that phosphorylation of histone f2a2 should continue to be considered in models concerning activation of DNA template activity.     

Lysine methylation: beyond histones

Posttranslational modifications (PTMs) of histone proteins, such as acetylation, methylation, phosphorylation, and ubiquitylation, play essential roles in regulating chromatin dynamics. Combinations of different modifications on the histone proteins, termed 'histone code' in many cases, extend the information potential of the genetic code by regulating DNA at the epigenetic level. Many PTMs occur on non-histone proteins as well as histones, regulating protein-protein interactions, stability, localization, and/or enzymatic activities of proteins involved in diverse cellular processes. Although protein phosphorylation, ubiquitylation, and acetylation have been extensively studied, only a few proteins other than histones have been reported that can be modified by lysine methylation. This review summarizes the current progress on lysine methylation of non-histone proteins, and we propose that lysine methylation, like phosphorylation and acetylation, is a common PTM that regulates proteins in diverse cellular processes.     

Contributions to nucleosome dynamics in chromatin from interactive propagation of phosphorylation/acetylation and inducible histone lysine basicities

The effect of phosphorylation on the basicities of amines in histone H3 peptides and their acetylation kinetics is probed with a mild chemical acetylating agent. Phosphorylation of Ser‐10 lowers the rate of chemical acetylation of Lys‐9, Lys‐14, and Lys‐18 by methyl acetyl phosphate in that order consistent with a higher pK_a of these Lys residues induced by phosphorylation; basicities increase up to 3 pK_a units as a function of distance from Ser‐10 phosphate. Enzymic acetylation of Lys residues with high pK_a values in nucleosomes is also expected to be enhanced by phosphorylation, consistent with the known mechanism involving binding of protonated amines to N‐acetyltransferases; fetal hemoglobin has a related linkage of increased basicity at a specific site, its acetylation, and a resulting decrease in subunit interaction strength. In the absence of a phosphate on Ser‐10, the amines of Lys‐9, Lys‐14, and Lys‐18 have lowered pK_a values. Chemical acetylation of glycine and glycinamide have analogous kinetic profiles to the histone peptides but the phosphate inductive effect in histone H3 is more potent since the linkage between phosphorylation and acetylation is propagated with a range extending 9–10 amino acids in either direction from the phosphorylation site enhancing protonation of amino groups. We conclude that lysine amine basicities in histone tails are not static but inducible and variable due to a dynamic and immediate interaction between phosphorylation/acetylation that may contribute to inactive heterochromatin by compaction through such Ser phosphate–Lys amine electrostatic interactions and their relaxation by acetylation in euchromatin.     

CELL CYCLE-SPECIFIC CHANGES IN HISTONE PHOSPHORYLATION ASSOCIATED WITH CELL PROLIFERATION AND CHROMOSOME CONDENSATION

Preparative polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis was used to examine histone phosphorylation in synchronized Chinese hamster cells (line CHO). Results showed that histone f1 phosphorylation, absent in G₁-arrested and early G₁-traversing cells, commences 2 h before entry of traversing cells into the S phase. It is concluded that f1 phosphorylation is one of the earliest biochemical events associated with conversion of nonproliferating cells to proliferating cells occurring on old f1 before synthesis of new f1 during the S phase. Results also showed that f3 and a subfraction of f1 were rapidly phosphorylated only during the time when cells were crossing the G₂/M boundary and traversing prophase. Since these phosphorylation events do not occur in G₁, S, or G₂ and are reduced greatly in metaphase, it is concluded that these two specific phosphorylation events are involved with condensation of interphase chromatin into mitotic chromosomes. This conclusion is supported by loss of prelabeled ³²PO₄ from those specific histone fractions during transition of metaphase cells into interphase G₁ cells. A model of the relationship of histone phosphorylation to the cell cycle is presented which suggests involvement of f1 phosphorylation in chromatin structural changes associated with a continuous interphase "chromosome cycle" which culminates at mitosis with an f3 and f1 phosphorylation-mediated chromosome condensation.     

Detection of Histone Modifications in Plant Leaves

Chromatin structure is important for the regulation of gene expression in eukaryotes. In this process, chromatin remodeling, DNA methylation, and covalent modifications on the amino-terminal tails of histones H3 and H4 play essential roles^1-2. H3 and H4 histone modifications include methylation of lysine and arginine, acetylation of lysine, and phosphorylation of serine residues^1-2. These modifications are associated either with gene activation, repression, or a primed state of gene that supports more rapid and robust activation of expression after perception of appropriate signals (microbe-associated molecular patterns, light, hormones, etc.)^3-7. Here, we present a method for the reliable and sensitive detection of specific chromatin modifications on selected plant genes. The technique is based on the crosslinking of (modified) histones and DNA with formaldehyde^8,9, extraction and sonication of chromatin, chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) with modification-specific antibodies^9,10, de-crosslinking of histone-DNA complexes, and gene-specific real-time quantitative PCR. The approach has proven useful for detecting specific histone modifications associated with C₄ photosynthesis in maize^5,11 and systemic immunity in Arabidopsis³.     

Developmentally regulated histone modifications in <Emphasis Type="Italic">Drosophila</Emphasis> follicle cells: initiation of gene amplification is associated with histone H3 and H4 hyperacetylation and H1 phosphorylation

We have used gene amplification in Drosophila follicle cells as a model of metazoan DNA replication to address whether changes in histone modifications are associated with replication origin activation. We observe that replication initiation is associated with distinct histone modifications. Acetylated lysines K5, K8, and K12 on histone H4 and K14 on histone H3 are specifically enriched during replication initiation at the amplification origins. Strikingly, H4 acetylation persists at an amplification origin well after replication forks have progressed significantly outward from the origin, indicating that H4 acetylation is associated with origin regulation and not histone deposition at the replication forks. Origin recognition complex subunit 2 (orc2) mutants with severe amplification defects do not abolish H4 acetylation, whereas the dup/cdt1 mutant delays the appearance of acetylation foci, and mutants in rbf result in temporal persistence. These data indicate that core histone acetylation is associated with origin activity. Furthermore, follicle cells undergoing gene amplification exhibit high levels of histone H1 phosphorylation. The patterns of H1 phosphorylation provide insights into cell cycle states during amplification, as H1 kinase activity in follicle cells is responsive to high Cyclin E activity, and it can be abolished by overexpressing the retinoblastoma homolog, Rbf, that represses Cyclin E. These data suggest that amplification origins are able to initiate when the cells are in a late S-phase, when the genome is normally not licensed for replication.     

Modification of histones immediately following synthesis

The acetylation of newly synthesized histones has been studied by exploiting the ability of sodium butyrate to inhibit deacetylation. Upon arrival in the nucleus a significant fraction of histones H2a, H2b, and H3 is in the parental unmodified form. In contrast histone H4 first appears primarily in the diacetylated form. During an ensuing 135 min the diacetylated H4 is slowly further modified.     

Development of live-cell imaging probes for monitoring histone modifications

The combination of histone posttranslational modifications occurring in nucleosomal histones determines the epigenetic code. Histone modifications such as acetylation are dynamically controlled in response to a variety of signals during the cell cycle and differentiation, but they are paradoxically maintained through cell division to impart tissue specific gene expression patterns to progeny. The dynamics of histone modifications in living cells are poorly understood, because of the lack of experimental tools to monitor them in a real-time fashion. Recently, FRET-based imaging probes for histone H4 acetylation have been developed, which enabled monitoring of changes in histone acetylation during the cell cycle and drug treatment. Further development of this type of fluorescent probes for other modifications will make it possible to visualize complicated epigenetic regulation in living cells.     

Trypanosoma cruzi bromodomain factor 2 (BDF2) binds to acetylated histones and is accumulated after UV irradiation

Histone tail post-translational modifications (acetylation, methylation, phosphorylation, ubiquitination and ADP-ribosylation) regulate many cellular processes. Among these modifications, phosphorylation, methylation and acetylation have already been described in trypanosomatid histones. Bromodomains, together with chromodomains and histone-binding SANT domains, were proposed to be responsible for “histone code” reading. The Trypanosoma cruzi genome encodes four coding sequences (CDSs) that contain a bromodomain, named TcBDF1-4. Here we show that one of those, TcBDF2, is expressed in discrete regions inside the nucleus of all the parasite life cycle stages and binds H4 and H2A purified histones from T. cruzi. Immunolocalization experiments using both anti-histone H4 acetylated peptides and anti-TcBDF2 antibodies determined that TcBDF2 co-localizes with histone H4 acetylated at lysines K10 and K14. TcDBF2 and K10 acetylated H4 interaction was confirmed by co-immunoprecipitation. It is also shown that TcBDF2 was accumulated after UV irradiation of T. cruzi epimastigotes. These results suggest that TcBDF2 could be taking part in a chromatin remodelling complex in T. cruzi.     

The phosphorylation region of lysine-rich histone in dividing cells

N-Bromosuccinimide cleavage of in vivo ³²P-labelled lysine-rich histone isolated from rapidly dividing cells has been studied. N-Bromosuccinimide cleaves F₁-histone into two fragments, a small N-terminal piece and a larger C-terminal portion. The phosphate-induced microheterogeneity and associated radioactivity which has been linked to cell replication, is found in the carboxyterminal fragment. No phosphorous is found associated with the amino-terminal fragment when histone phosphorylation is associated with cell division. The specific tryptic phosphopeptides obtained from in vivo labelled F₁ are clearly different from those obtained from in vitro incubations of free F₁-histone and cytoplasmic protein kinase.     

Distinctive core histone post-translational modification patterns in Arabidopsis thaliana

Post-translational modifications of histones play crucial roles in the genetic and epigenetic regulation of gene expression from chromatin. Studies in mammals and yeast have found conserved modifications at some residues of histones as well as non-conserved modifications at some other sites. Although plants have been excellent systems to study epigenetic regulation, and histone modifications are known to play critical roles, the histone modification sites and patterns in plants are poorly defined. In the present study we have used mass spectrometry in combination with high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) separation and phospho-peptide enrichment to identify histone modification sites in the reference plant, Arabidopsis thaliana. We found not only modifications at many sites that are conserved in mammalian and yeast cells, but also modifications at many sites that are unique to plants. These unique modifications include H4 K20 acetylation (in contrast to H4 K20 methylation in non-plant systems), H2B K6, K11, K27 and K32 acetylation, S15 phosphorylation and K143 ubiquitination, and H2A K144 acetylation and S129, S141 and S145 phosphorylation, and H2A.X S138 phosphorylation. In addition, we found that lysine 79 of H3 which is highly conserved and modified by methylation and plays important roles in telomeric silencing in non-plant systems, is not modified in Arabidopsis. These results suggest distinctive histone modification patterns in plants and provide an invaluable foundation for future studies on histone modifications in plants.     

Sites of Acetylation on Newly Synthesized Histone H4 Are Required for Chromatin Assembly and DNA Damage Response Signaling

The best-characterized acetylation of newly synthesized histone H4 is the diacetylation of the NH₂-terminal tail on lysines 5 and 12. Despite its evolutionary conservation, this pattern of modification has not been shown to be essential for either viability or chromatin assembly in any model organism. We demonstrate that mutations in histone H4 lysines 5 and 12 in yeast confer hypersensitivity to replication stress and DNA-damaging agents when combined with mutations in histone H4 lysine 91, which has also been found to be a site of acetylation on soluble histone H4. In addition, these mutations confer a dramatic decrease in cell viability when combined with mutations in histone H3 lysine 56. We also show that mutation of the sites of acetylation on newly synthesized histone H4 results in defects in the reassembly of chromatin structure that accompanies the repair of HO-mediated double-strand breaks. This defect is not due to a decrease in the level of histone H3 lysine 56 acetylation. Intriguingly, mutations that alter the sites of newly synthesized histone H4 acetylation display a marked decrease in levels of phosphorylated H2A (γ-H2AX) in chromatin surrounding the double-strand break. These results indicate that the sites of acetylation on newly synthesized histones H3 and H4 can function in nonoverlapping ways that are required for chromatin assembly, viability, and DNA damage response signaling.