Evidence for the existence of snRNAs U4 and U6 in a single ribonucleoprotein complex and for their association by intermolecular base pairing

Small nuclear ribonucleoprotein particles (snRNPs) from eucaryotic cells can be fractionated on affinity columns prepared with antibodies of high affinity for 2,2,7-trimethyl-guanosine (m3G), which is present in the 5'-terminal caps of the snRNAs. While the snRNPs U1, U2 and U5 are eluted with the nucleoside m3G in the presence of 0.1 M salt, the snRNP species U4 and U6 are only desorbed when the salt concentration is increased. The same fractionation pattern was likewise observed for snRNPs from HeLa or Ehrlich ascites tumor cells. Since U6 RNA lacks the m3G residue and its RNA does not react with anti-m3G, its co-chromatography with U4 RNP on anti-m3G affinity columns suggests either that discrete snRNPs U4 and U6 are intimately associated in nuclear extracts or that both RNAs are organized in one ribonucleoprotein particle. Further evidence for a U4/U6 RNP particle is obtained by sedimentation studies with purified snRNPs in sucrose gradients. Gel fractionation of RNAs shows identical distributions of snRNAs U4 and U6 in the gradient, and the U4/U6 RNP particle sediments faster than the snRNPs U1 or U2. Physical association between snRNPs U4 and U6 during sedimentation is shown by their co-precipitation with anti-m3G IgG from the gradient fractions. Finally, experimental evidence is provided that snRNAs U4 and U6 are associated by intermolecular base pairing in the U4/U6 RNP particle, as demonstrated by our finding that anti-m3G IgG co-precipitates U6 RNA with U4 RNA following phenolization of U4/U6 RNPs at 0 degrees C.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Fungal small nuclear ribonucleoproteins share properties with plant and vertebrate U-snRNPs.

snRNAs with properties closely related to those of the major vertebrate U-snRNAs are present in the fungi Aspergillus nidulans, Neurospora crassa and Schizosaccharomyces pombe. These RNAs possess a tri-methyl guanosine cap structure and a subset cross-hybridizes with human U1 and U2 clones. In the form of snRNPs, snRNAs from these fungi as well as from Saccharomyces cerevisiae and pea plants are immunoprecipitated by human and anti-Sm or anti-(U1)RNP autoimmune antibodies. On micro-injection into the cytoplasm of Xenopus oocytes, the snRNAs are packaged into ribonucleoprotein particles and migrate into the nucleus. The results demonstrate a hitherto unsuspected degree of evolutionary conservation in snRNA structure, snRNP protein structure, and sites of RNA-protein interaction within snRNPs.     

Localization and structure of snRNPs during mitosis. Immunofluorescent and biochemical studies

The distribution of U snRNAs during mitosis was studied by indirect immunofluorescence microscopy with snRNA cap-specific anti-m3G antibodies. Whereas the snRNAs are strictly nuclear at late prophase, they become distributed in the cell plasm at metaphase and anaphase. They re-enter the newly formed nuclei of the two daughter cells at early telophase, producing speckled nuclear fluorescent patterns typical of interphase cells. While the snRNAs become concentrated at the rim of the condensing chromosomes and at interchromosomal regions at late prophase, essentially no association of the snRNAs was observed with the condensed chromosomes during metaphase and anaphase. Independent immunofluorescent studies with anti-(U1)RNP autoantibodies, which react specifically with proteins unique to the U1 snRNP species, showed the same distribution of snRNP antigens during mitosis as was observed with the snRNA-specific anti-m3G antibody. Immunoprecipitation studies with anti-(U1)RNP and anti-Sm autoantibodies, as well as protein analysis of snRNPs isolated from extracts of mitotic cells, demonstrate that the snRNAs remain associated in a specific manner with the same set of proteins during interphase and mitosis. The concept that the overall structure of the snRNPs is maintained during mitosis also applies to the coexistence of the snRNAs U4 and U6 in a single ribonucleoprotein complex. Particle sedimentation studies in sucrose gradients reveal that most of the snRNPs present in sonicates of mitotic cells do not sediment as free RNP particles, but remain associated with high molecular weight (HMW) structures other than chromatin, most probably with hnRNA/RNP.     

Lsm proteins promote regeneration of pre-mRNA splicing activity

Lsm proteins are ubiquitous, multifunctional proteins that affect the processing of most RNAs in eukaryotic cells, but their function is unknown. A complex of seven Lsm proteins, Lsm2-8, associates with the U6 small nuclear RNA (snRNA) that is a component of spliceosome complexes in which pre-mRNA splicing occurs. Spliceosomes contain five snRNAs, U1, U2, U4, U5, and U6, that are packaged as ribonucleoprotein particles (snRNPs). U4 and U6 snRNAs contain extensive sequence complementarity and interact to form U4/U6 di-snRNPs. U4/U6 di-snRNPs associate with U5 snRNPs to form U4/U6.U5 tri-snRNPs prior to spliceosome assembly. Within spliceosomes, disruption of base-paired U4/U6 heterodimer allows U6 snRNA to form part of the catalytic center. Following completion of the splicing reaction, snRNPs must be recycled for subsequent rounds of splicing, although little is known about this process. Here we present evidence that regeneration of splicing activity in vitro is dependent on Lsm proteins. RNP reconstitution experiments with exogenous U6 RNA show that Lsm proteins promote the formation of U6-containing complexes and suggest that Lsm proteins have a chaperone-like function, supporting the assembly or remodeling of RNP complexes involved in splicing. Such a function could explain the involvement of Lsm proteins in a wide variety of RNA processing pathways.     

Nucleocytoplasmic distribution of snRNPs and stockpiled snRNA-binding proteins during oogenesis and early development in Xenopus laevis

The distribution of small nuclear ribonucleoprotein particles containing U snRNAs (U snRNPs) during oogenesis and early development in Xenopus was analyzed with a lupus antibody (anti-Sm) that reacts with snRNA-binding proteins. Fully grown oocytes and embryos prior to gastrulation were found to be relatively depleted of U snRNPs in their nuclei and to contain an excess of snRNA-binding proteins stored in the cytoplasm. During late blastula-early gastrula, or after microinjection of U snRNAs into the cytoplasm of a mature oocyte, the proteins migrate into the nucleus. Dot hybridization analysis showed that small previtellogenic oocytes already contain a maximal amount of U1 (and U2) snRNAs, which then decreases to about 20% of that value in fully mature oocytes, even though the cell's volume has increased enormously. Thus fully grown oocytes and eggs accumulate snRNA-binding proteins for use during early development, but this is not coupled with the accumulation of U snRNA.     

The Cajal body: a meeting place for spliceosomal snRNPs in the nuclear maze

Spliceosomal small nuclear ribonucleoprotein particles (snRNPs) are essential pre-mRNA splicing factors that consist of small nuclear RNAs (snRNAs) complexed with specific sets of proteins. A considerable body of evidence has established that snRNP assembly is accomplished after snRNA synthesis in the nucleus through a series of steps involving cytoplasmic and nuclear phases. Recent work indicates that snRNPs transiently localize to the Cajal body (CB), a nonmembrane-bound inclusion present in the nuclei of most cells, for the final steps in snRNP maturation, including snRNA base modification, U4/U6 snRNA annealing, and snRNA-protein assembly. Here, we review these findings that suggest a crucial role for CBs in the spliceosome cycle in which production of new snRNPs—and perhaps regenerated snRNPs after splicing—is promoted by the concentration of substrates in this previously mysterious subnuclear organelle. These insights allow us to speculate on the role of nuclear bodies in regulating the dynamics of RNP assembly to maintain a functional pool of factors available for key steps in gene expression.     

Associations of small nuclear RNAs in human cells

Several observations have been made about the associations of small nuclear RNAs (snRNAs) in human cells. When nuclear RNA was extracted with phenol and chloroform under standard nondenaturing conditions, the proportion of the nuclear snRNA content that cosedimented with high molecular weight RNA was very low. These results do not support the proposal that it is a large percentage of the cellular snRNA content that is involved in relatively stable base-paired interactions with heterogeneous nuclear RNA at any given time. The various small nuclear ribonucleoprotein particles (snRNPs), in which the snRNAs are found in the cell, appear to differ substantially in their sedimentation rates under conditions of physiological ionic strength. Using anti-RNP and anti-Sm antibodies to analyze various subcellular fractions, we found that most, if not all, of the U1 snRNA cellular content is associated with the polypeptide(s) bearing the RNP determinant (in interphase and mitotic cells) and with the polypeptide(s) carrying the Sm determinant (in mitotic cells).     

Sequence-specific interaction of U1 snRNA with the SMN complex

The survival of motor neurons (SMN) protein complex functions in the biogenesis of spliceosomal small nuclear ribonucleoprotein particles (snRNPs) and prob ably other RNPs. All spliceosomal snRNPs have a common core of seven Sm proteins. To mediate the assembly of snRNPs, the SMN complex must be able to bring together Sm proteins with U snRNAs. We showed previously that SMN and other components of the SMN complex interact directly with several Sm proteins. Here, we show that the SMN complex also interacts specifically with U1 snRNA. The stem--loop 1 domain of U1 (SL1) is necessary and sufficient for SMN complex binding in vivo and in vitro. Substitution of three nucleotides in the SL1 loop (SL1A3) abolishes SMN interaction, and the corresponding U1 snRNA (U1A3) is impaired in U1 snRNP biogenesis. Microinjection of excess SL1 but not SL1A3 into Xenopus oocytes inhibits SMN complex binding to U1 snRNA and U1 snRNP assembly. These findings indicate that SMN complex interaction with SL1 is sequence-specific and critical for U1 snRNP biogenesis, further supporting the direct role of the SMN complex in RNP biogenesis.     

A 69-kD protein that associates reversibly with the Sm core domain of several spliceosomal snRNP species

The biogenesis of the spliceosomal small nuclear ribonucleoproteins (snRNPs) U1, U2, U4, and U5 involves: (a) migration of the snRNA molecules from the nucleus to the cytoplasm; (b) assembly of a group of common proteins (Sm proteins) and their binding to a region on the snRNAs called the Sm-binding site; and (c) translocation of the RNP back to the nucleus. A first prerequisite for understanding the assembly pathway and nuclear transport of the snRNPs in more detail is the knowledge of all the snRNP proteins that play essential roles in these processes. We have recently observed a previously undetected 69- kD protein in 12S U1 snRNPs isolated from HeLa nuclear extracts under non-denaturing conditions that is clearly distinct from the U1-70K protein. The following evidence indicates that the 69-kD protein is a common, rather than a U1-specific, protein, possibly associating with the snRNP core particles by protein-protein interaction. (a) Antibodies raised against the 69-kD protein, which did not cross-react with any of the Sm proteins B'-G, precipitated not only U1 snRNPs, but also the other spliceosomal snRNPs U2, U4/U6 and U5, albeit to a lower extent. (b) U1, U2, and U5 core RNP particles reconstituted in vitro contain the 69-kD protein. (c) Xenopus laevis oocytes contain an immunologically related homologue of the human 69-kD protein. When U1 snRNA as well as a mutant U1 snRNA, that can bind the Sm core proteins but lacks the capacity to bind the U1-specific proteins 70K, A, and C, were injected into Xenopus oocytes to allow assembly in vivo, they were recognized by antibodies specific against the 69-kD protein in the ooplasm and in the nucleus. The 69-kD protein is under-represented, if present at all, in purified 17S U2 and in 25S [U4/U6.U5] tri-snRNPs, isolated from HeLa nuclear extracts. Our results are consistent with the working hypothesis that this protein may either play a role in the cytoplasmic assembly of the core domain of the snRNPs and/or in the nuclear transport of the snRNPs. After transport of the snRNPs into the nucleus, it may dissociate from the particles as for example in the case of the 17S U2 or the 25S [U4/U6.U5] tri-snRNP, which bind more than 10 different snRNP specific proteins each in the nucleus.     

Immunoprecipitation distinguishes non-overlapping groups of snRNPs in Schizosaccharomyces pombe.

The large number of snRNAs in the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe can be divided into four non-overlapping groups by immunoprecipitation with antibodies directed against mammalian snRNP proteins. 1) Of the abundant snRNAs, anti-Sm sera precipitate only the spliceosomal snRNAs U1, U2, U4, U5 and U6. Surprisingly, three Sm-sera tested distinguish between U2, U4 and U5 and U1 from S.pombe; one precipitating only U1 and two precipitating U2, U4 and U5 but not U1. 2) A group of 11 moderately abundant snRNAs are not detectably precipitated by human anti-Sm sera, but are specifically precipitated by monoclonal antibody H57 specific for the human B/B' polypeptides. From Aspergillus nidulans this antibody also precipitates at least 12 snRNAs. 3) Anti-(U3)RNP sera do not precipitate the above snRNAs, but precipitate at least 6 further snRNAs, including the homologues of U3. Both the anti-(U3)RNP sera and H57 also efficiently precipitate a number of discrete non-capped RNAs. 4) A small number of additional snRNAs are not detectably precipitated by any anti-serum tested to date, further analysis may identify antisera specific for these snRNPs. Western blots of purified snRNP proteins were used to identify the S.pombe proteins responsible for these immunoprecipitations. Several Sm-sera decorate a 16.3kD protein which may be a D protein homologue, monoclonal H57 decorates a further protein of 16kD and an anti-(U3)RNP serum decorates the homologue of the 36kD U3-specific protein, fibrillarin.     

Loop I of U1 small nuclear RNA is the only essential RNA sequence for binding of specific U1 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein particle proteins.

The binding of the U1 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein (snRNP)-specific proteins C, A, and 70K to U1 small nuclear RNA (snRNA) was analyzed. Assembly of U1 snRNAs from bean and soybean and a set of mutant Xenopus U1 snRNAs into U1 snRNPs in Xenopus egg extracts was studied. The ability to bind proteins was analyzed by immunoprecipitation with monospecific antibodies and by a protein-sequestering assay. The only sequence essential for binding of the U1-specific proteins was the conserved loop sequence in the 5' hairpin of U1. Further analysis suggested that protein C binds directly to the loop and that the assembly of proteins A and 70K into the RNP requires mainly protein-protein interactions. Protein C apparently recognizes a specific RNA sequence rather than a secondary structural element in the RNA.