A New Analytical Method For Determining Duration of Phases, Rate of Dna Synthesis and Degree of Synchronization From Flow-Cytometric Data On Synchronized Cell Populations

L-cells synchronized by mitotic selection were investigated by flow-cytometry nd the fractions of cells in the various cell cycle compartments were determined as a function of time. A new analytical evaluation procedure was developed, by which the mean transit-times of cells through various cell cycle phases can be calculated from these data. Three examples for application of the method are presented: (1) determination of the duration of G₁, S, G₂+ M and of the whole cell cycle; (2) calculation of the rate of DNA synthesis in several subcompartments of the S-phase; and (3) evaluation of the degree of synchronization at different stages of the cell cycle.     

A new analytical method for determining duration of phases, rate of DNA synthesis and degree of synchronization from flow-cytometric data on synchronized cell populations.

L-cells synchronized by mitotic selection were investigated by flow-cytometry and the fractions of cells in the various cell cycle compartments were determined as a function of time. A new analytical evaluation procedure was developed, by which the mean transit-times of cells through various cell cycle phases can be calculated from these data. Three examples for application of the method are presented: (1) determination of the duration of G1, S, G2 + M and of the whole cell cycle; (2) calculation of the rate of DNA synthesis in several subcompartments of the S-phase; and (3) evaluation of the degree of synchronization at different stages of the cell cycle.     

Temporal Tracking of Cell Cycle Progression Using Flow Cytometry without the Need for Synchronization

This protocol describes a method to permit the tracking of cells through the cell cycle without requiring the cells to be synchronized. Achieving cell synchronization can be difficult for many cell systems. Standard practice is to block cell cycle progression at a specific stage and then release the accumulated cells producing a wave of cells progressing through the cycle in unison. However, some cell types find this block toxic resulting in abnormal cell cycling, or even mass death. Bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) uptake can be used to track the cell cycle stage of individual cells. Cells incorporate this synthetic thymidine analog, while synthesizing new DNA during S phase. By providing BrdU for a brief period it is possible to mark a pool of cells that were in S phase while the BrdU was present. These cells can then be tracked through the remainder of the cell cycle and into the next round of replication, permitting the duration of the cell cycle phases to be determined without the need to induce a potentially toxic cell cycle block. It is also possible to determine and correlate the expression of both internal and external proteins during subsequent stages of the cell cycle. These can be used to further refine the assignment of cell cycle stage or assess effects on other cellular functions such as checkpoint activation or cell death.     

Screening of five specific cell cycle inhibitors using a T Cell lymphoma cell line synchrony/release assay

To obtain different cell populations at specific cell cycle stages, we used a cell culture synchronization protocol. Effects of five different cell cycle inhibitors acting throughout the cell cycle were examined by DNA flow cytometric analysis of a synchrony/release lymphoma cell line (CEM). The screening synchronized protocol showed that staurosporine, mimosine and aphidicolin are reversible G1 phase inhibitors that act at different times. Staurosporine acted in early G1, exhibited the strongest cytotoxic effect, and induced apoptosis. Mimosine and aphidicolin acted in late G1 and at the G1/S boundary, respectively. Hydroxyurea arrested CEM cells in early S phase, but later than the aphidicolin arrest point. Nocodazole synchronized CEM cells in M phase. All the inhibitors examined in this study can be used to synchronize cells at different phases of the cell cycle and were reversible with little toxicity except for staurosporine which is highly toxic. Because the regulatory mechanism of the cell cycle is disrupted by their effects on protein synthesis, however, these drugs must be used with caution.     

Cell Cycle Synchronization of the Murine EO771 Cell Line Using Double Thymidine Block Treatment

This study shows that double thymidine block treatment efficiently arrests the EO771 cells in the S-phase without altering cell growth or survival. A long-term analysis of cell behavior, using 5(6)-carboxyfluorescein diacetate N-succinimidyl ester (CFSE) staining, show synchronization to be stable and consistent over time. The EO771 cell line is a medullary breast-adenocarcinoma cell line isolated from a spontaneous murine mammary tumor, and can be used to generate murine tumor implantation models. Different biological (serum or amino acid deprivation), physical (elutriation, mitotic shake-off), or chemical (colchicine, nocodazole, thymidine) treatments are widely used for cell synchronization. Of the different methods tested, the double thymidine block is the most efficient for synchronization of murine EO771 cells if a large quantity of highly synchronized cells is recommended to study functional and biochemical events occurring in specific points of cell cycle progression.     

Cell Cycle Markers for Live Cell Analyses

Many cellular processes are regulated by cell cycle dependent changes in protein dynamics and localization. Studying these changes in vivo requires methods to distinguish the different cell cycle stages. Here we demonstrate the use of DNA Ligase I fused to DsRed1 as an in situ marker to identify S phase and the subsequent transition to G2 in live cells. Using this marker, we observed changes in the nuclear distribution of Dnmt1 during cell cycle progression. Based on the different nuclear distribution of DNA Ligase I and Dnmt1 in G2 and G1, we demonstrate that the combination of both proteins allows the direct discrimination of all cell cycle phases using either immunostainings or fusions with fluorescent proteins. These markers are new tools to directly study cell cycle dependent processes in both, fixed and living cells.     

体外培养的牛耳成纤维细胞的细胞周期研究

通过细胞体外培养,对牛耳成纤维细胞的周期分布进行了研究。不同代数的细胞在生长至70-85％汇合和血清饥饿72h两种状态的细胞周期分布无显著差异。对于体外培养的第8代细胞,生长至50-60％、70-85％和完全汇合时,细胞周期分布存在显著差异;而培养时间对血清饥饿培养和正常培养至充分汇合时的细胞周期分布无显著影响。结果表明,体外培养代数及培养方法不会明显影响细胞周期的分布,但同代细胞因处于不同生长阶段细胞周期分布会存在显著差异。     

Synchronization of Caulobacter Crescentus for Investigation of the Bacterial Cell Cycle

The cell cycle is important for growth, genome replication, and development in all cells. In bacteria, studies of the cell cycle have focused largely on unsynchronized cells making it difficult to order the temporal events required for cell cycle progression, genome replication, and division. Caulobacter crescentus provides an excellent model system for the bacterial cell cycle whereby cells can be rapidly synchronized in a G0 state by density centrifugation. Cell cycle synchronization experiments have been used to establish the molecular events governing chromosome replication and segregation, to map a genetic regulatory network controlling cell cycle progression, and to identify the establishment of polar signaling complexes required for asymmetric cell division. Here we provide a detailed protocol for the rapid synchronization of Caulobacter NA1000 cells. Synchronization can be performed in a large-scale format for gene expression profiling and western blot assays, as well as a small-scale format for microscopy or FACS assays. The rapid synchronizability and high cell yields of Caulobacter make this organism a powerful model system for studies of the bacterial cell cycle.     

Cell cycle-dependent protein secretion by Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Synchronized Saccharomyces cerevisiae cell populations were used to examine secretion rates of a heterologous protein as a function of cell cycle position. The synchronization procedure had a profound effect on the type and quality of data obtained. When cell synchrony was induced by cell cycle-arresting drugs, a significant physiological perturbation of cells was observed that obscured representative secretion data. In contrast, synchronization with centrifugal elutriation resulted in synchronized first-generation daughter cells with undetectable perturbation of the physiological state. The synchronized cells did not secrete significant amounts of protein until they reached cell division, suggesting that the secretion process in these cells is strongly cell cycle dependent. However, the maximum secretion rate of the synchronized culture (7-14 molecules/cell/second) was significantly lower than that of an asynchronous culture (29-51 molecules/cell/second). This result indicates that young daughter cells isolated in the synchronization process exhibit different protein secretion behavior than older mother cells that are absent in the synchronized cell population but present in the asynchronous culture.     

Systematic Characterization of Cell Cycle Phase-dependent Protein Dynamics and Pathway Activities by High-content Microscopy-assisted Cell Cycle Phenotyping

Cell cycle progression is coordinated with metabolism, signaling and other complex cellular functions. The investigation of cellular processes in a cell cycle stage-dependent manner is often the subject of modern molecular and cell biological research. Cell cycle synchronization and immunostaining of cell cycle markers facilitate such analysis, but are limited in use due to unphysiological experimental stress, cell type dependence and often low flexibility. Here, we describe high-content microscopy-assisted cell cycle phenotyping（hi MAC）, which integrates high-resolution cell cycle profiling of asynchronous cell populations with immunofluorescence microscopy. hi MAC is compatible with cell types from any species and allows for statistically powerful, unbiased, simultaneous analysis of protein interactions, modifications and subcellular localization at all cell cycle stages within a single sample. For illustration, we provide a hi MAC analysis pipeline tailored to study DNA damage response and genomic instability using a 3–4-day protocol,which can be adjusted to any other cell cycle stage-dependent analysis.     

Dynamic Proteomics of Human Protein Level and Localization across the Cell Cycle

Regulation of proteins across the cell cycle is a basic process in cell biology. It has been difficult to study this globally in human cells due to lack of methods to accurately follow protein levels and localizations over time. Estimates based on global mRNA measurements suggest that only a few percent of human genes have cell-cycle dependent mRNA levels. Here, we used dynamic proteomics to study the cell-cycle dependence of proteins. We used 495 clones of a human cell line, each with a different protein tagged fluorescently at its endogenous locus. Protein level and localization was quantified in individual cells over 24h of growth using time-lapse microscopy. Instead of standard chemical or mechanical methods for cell synchronization, we employed in-silico synchronization to place protein levels and localization on a time axis between two cell divisions. This non-perturbative synchronization approach, together with the high accuracy of the measurements, allowed a sensitive assay of cell-cycle dependence. We further developed a computational approach that uses texture features to evaluate changes in protein localizations. We find that 40% of the proteins showed cell cycle dependence, of which 11% showed changes in protein level and 35% in localization. This suggests that a broader range of cell-cycle dependent proteins exists in human cells than was previously appreciated. Most of the cell-cycle dependent proteins exhibit changes in cellular localization. Such changes can be a useful tool in the regulation of the cell-cycle being fast and efficient.     

Dna-end binding activity of Ku in synchronized cells

Three different types of cells were synchronized by various methods and DNA-end binding (DEB) activities of Ku were compared with asynchronous controls. In CHO K1 cells synchronized in G1 phase by serum starvation and in S phase by serum refeeding, DEB activity was reduced in S cells but remained unchanged in G1 cells. However, the same type of cells synchronized in G1/S phase by double thymidine block and in S phase by releasing the blockage, have the same DEB activity as asynchronous controls. A similar result was found in RKO and HeLa cells synchronized by the latter method. Arresting cells in mitosis with nocodazole also generated different cell cycle effects. Ku activity was reduced in CHO K1 and RKO cells, but not in HeLa cells after treatment with nocodazole. In phase-enriched cells separated by centrifugal elutriation, DEB activities were similar at different stages of the cell cycle in all three types of cells. Thus, different synchronization procedures can give very different values of Ku activity in a cell type-dependent manner. Results from elutriated cells are consistent, and suggest DEB activity of Ku does not change with the cell cycle.     

Synchronization of cell cycle of <Emphasis Type="Italic">Saccharomyces cerevisiae</Emphasis> by using a cell chip platform

Cell synchrony is a critical requirement for the study of eukaryotic cells. Although several chemical and genetic methods of cell cycle synchronization are currently available, they have certain limitations, such as unnecessary perturbations to cells. We developed a novel cell cycle synchronization method that is based on a cell chip platform. The budding yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, is a simple but useful model system to study cell biology and shares many similar features with higher eukaryotic cells. Single yeast cells were individually captured in the wells of a specially designed cell chip platform. When released from the cell chip, the yeast cells were synchronized, with all cells in the G1 phase. This method is non-invasive and causes minimal chemical and biological damage to cells. The capture and release of cells using cells chips with microwells of specific dimensions allows for the isolation of cells of a particular size and shape; this enables the isolation of cells of a given phase, because the size and shape of yeast cells vary with the phase of the cell cycle. To test the viability of synchronized cells, the yeast cells captured in the cell chip platform were assessed for response to mating pheromone (α-factor). The synchronized cells isolated using the cell chip were capable of mediating the mating signaling response and exhibited a dynamic and robust response behavior. By changing the dimensions of the well of the cell chip, cells of other cell cycle phases can also be isolated.     

与细胞周期G2/M期进程相关的H2AX磷酸化

γH2AX焦点(foci)被普遍当做DNA双链断裂（DSB）损伤的分子标志物.为探 讨细胞周期进程相关的H2AX磷酸化规律特征,采用胸腺嘧啶双阻滞结合噻氨酯哒唑(nocodazole)的后续处理,将HeLa细胞同步于有丝分裂的前中期．然后,用流式细胞仪检测细胞周期、Western印迹和免疫荧光法,观察γH2AX表达和γH2AX焦点的形成．结果显示,细胞进入G2/M期和有丝分裂过程中,γH2AX水平显著增加 ;在无DNA DSB发生的情况下,部分M期细胞中也存在大量的γH2AX焦点．随着细 胞完成有丝分裂从M期退出再进入G1期,γH2AX的表达水平逐渐降低．这种 γH2AX表达变化特征与G2/M期密切关联的PLK1和Cyclin B1的表达规律相类似． 在4 Gy大剂量照射下,HeLa细胞于照后8 到12 h出现明显的G2/M期阻滞．γH2AX 焦点数在照后1 h达高峰,随后降低,照后8 h又上升,出现了第2个峰值．与之不同的是,在1 Gy低剂量照射下,细胞的G2/M期阻滞微弱,γH2AX焦点数在照后 0.5 h最高,随后下降,且无反弹,符合DNA DSB的修复动力学特征．因此,将γ H2AX当做DNA DSB分子标志物时,还需要考虑细胞周期变化的影响．γH2AX适合 作为1 Gy以下照射的DNA双链断裂损伤的分子标志．     

Differential Effect of Jasmonic Acid and Abscisic Acid on Cell Cycle Progression in Tobacco BY-2 Cells

Environmental stress affects plant growth and development. Several plant hormones, such as salicylic acid, abscisic acid (ABA), jasmonic acid (JA), and ethylene play a crucial role in altering plant morphology in response to stress. Developmental regulation often has the cell cycle machinery among its targets. We analyzed the effect of JA and ABA on cell cycle progression in synchronized tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) BY-2 cells. Both compounds were found to prevent DNA replication, keeping the cells in the G1 stage, when applied just before the G1/S transition. However, ABA did not have any effect on subsequent phases of the cell cycle when applied at a later stage, whereas JA effectively prevented mitosis on application during DNA synthesis. This demonstrates that JA treatment can freeze synchronized BY-2 cells in both the G1 and G2 stages of the cell cycle. Jasmonate administered after the S-phase was less effective in decreasing the mitotic index, suggesting that cell sensitivity toward JA is dependent on the cell cycle phase. In cultures detained in the G2-phase, we observed a reduced histone H1 kinase activity of kinases associated with the p13(suc1) protein.     

Cell synchrony techniques. I. A comparison of methods

Selected cell synchrony techniques, as applied to asynchronous populations of Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells, have been compared. Aliquots from the same culture of exponentially growing cells were synchronized using mitotic selection, mitotic selection and hydroxyurea block, centrifugal elutriation, or an EPICS V cell sorter. Sorting of cells was achieved after staining cells with Hoechst 33258. After synchronization by the various methods the relative distribution of cells in G1, S, or G2 + M phases of the cell cycle was determined by flow cytometry. Fractions of synchronized cells obtained from each method were replated and allowed to progress through a second cell cycle. Mitotic selection gave rise to relatively pure and unperturbed early G1 phase cells. While cell synchrony rapidly dispersed with time, cells progressed through the cell cycle in 12 hr. Sorting with the EPICS V on the modal G1 peak yielded a relatively pure but heterogeneous G1 population (i.e. early to late G1). Again, synchrony dispersed with time, but cell-cycle progression required 14 hr. With centrifugal elutriation, several different cell populations synchronized throughout the cell cycle could be rapidly obtained with a purity comparable to mitotic selection and cell sorting. It was concluded that, either alone or in combination with blocking agents such as hydroxyurea, elutriation and mitotic selection were both excellent methods for synchronizing CHO cells. Cell sorting exhibited limitations in sample size and time required for synchronizing CHO cells. Its major advantage would be its ability to isolate cell populations unique with respect to selected cellular parameters.     

mTOR及其底物在HeLa细胞的细胞周期不同时相中的表达

为探讨细胞生长的机制 ,用RT PCR、Western印迹及蛋白激酶活性测定等方法对同步化的HeLa细胞的细胞周期不同时相中mTOR(mammaliantargetofrapamycin) ,p70S6激酶 (p70S6K)的α1 、α2 、β1 、β2 不同亚型及起始因子 4E结合蛋白 1 (4EBP1 )的表达进行了检测 .RT PCR的结果表明 :在G1 、S1 、G2 、M1 、M2 几个细胞周期时相中 ,mTOR的mRNA表达无明显变化 .mTOR的底物P70S6K的亚型α1 、α2 、β1 、β2 在M期表达均有明显增加 .4EBP1的表达在M期明显减少 .免疫印迹的结果与RT PCR的一致 ,即M期p70S6K的α1 、α2 、均有增加 ,4EBP1在M期减少 .活性测定表明 ,G2 期、M期mTOR较其它期有明显增加 ,4EBP1在M期活性有所下降 .研究结果表明 :mTOR、p70S6K、4EBP1很可能在HeLa细胞的生长中起重要的调节作用     

Low Cell Number Proteomic Analysis Using In-Cell Protease Digests Reveals a Robust Signature for Cell Cycle State Classification

Comprehensive proteome analysis of rare cell phenotypes remains a significant challenge. We report a method for low cell number MS-based proteomics using protease digestion of mildly formaldehyde-fixed cells in cellulo, which we call the “in-cell digest.” We combined this with averaged MS1 precursor library matching to quantitatively characterize proteomes from low cell numbers of human lymphoblasts. About 4500 proteins were detected from 2000 cells, and 2500 proteins were quantitated from 200 lymphoblasts. The ease of sample processing and high sensitivity makes this method exceptionally suited for the proteomic analysis of rare cell states, including immune cell subsets and cell cycle subphases. To demonstrate the method, we characterized the proteome changes across 16 cell cycle states (CCSs) isolated from an asynchronous TK6 cells, avoiding synchronization. States included late mitotic cells present at extremely low frequency. We identified 119 pseudoperiodic proteins that vary across the cell cycle. Clustering of the pseudoperiodic proteins showed abundance patterns consistent with “waves” of protein degradation in late S, at the G2&M border, midmitosis, and at mitotic exit. These clusters were distinguished by significant differences in predicted nuclear localization and interaction with the anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome. The dataset also identifies putative anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome substrates in mitosis and the temporal order in which they are targeted for degradation. We demonstrate that a protein signature made of these 119 high-confidence cell cycle–regulated proteins can be used to perform unbiased classification of proteomes into CCSs. We applied this signature to 296 proteomes that encompass a range of quantitation methods, cell types, and experimental conditions. The analysis confidently assigns a CCS for 49 proteomes, including correct classification for proteomes from synchronized cells. We anticipate that this robust cell cycle protein signature will be crucial for classifying cell states in single-cell proteomes.