RNAi: RISC gets loaded

When an siRNA or miRNA proceeds through the RNA-induced silencing complex assembly pathway, only one of the two approximately 21-nucleotide RNA strands survives in the final, active complex. In this issue of Cell, Matranga et al. (2005) and Rand et al. (2005) reveal the fate of the rejected passenger siRNA strand. Additionally, Gregory et al. (2005) define a heterotrimeric complex from humans that appears to execute dsRNA loading, strand selection, and target mRNA cleavage activities.     

RNA degradation by the exosome is promoted by a nuclear polyadenylation complex

The exosome complex of 3'-5' exonucleases participates in RNA maturation and quality control and can rapidly degrade RNA-protein complexes in vivo. However, the purified exosome showed weak in vitro activity, indicating that rapid RNA degradation requires activating cofactors. This work identifies a nuclear polyadenylation complex containing a known exosome cofactor, the RNA helicase Mtr4p; a poly(A) polymerase, Trf4p; and a zinc knuckle protein, Air2p. In vitro, the Trf4p/Air2p/Mtr4p polyadenylation complex (TRAMP) showed distributive RNA polyadenylation activity. The presence of the exosome suppressed poly(A) tail addition, while TRAMP stimulated exosome degradation through structured RNA substrates. In vivo analyses showed that TRAMP is required for polyadenylation and degradation of rRNA and snoRNA precursors that are characterized exosome substrates. Poly(A) tails stimulate RNA degradation in bacteria, suggesting that this is their ancestral function. We speculate that this function was maintained in eukaryotic nuclei, while cytoplasmic mRNA poly(A) tails acquired different roles in translation.     

Polyadenylation of RNAs Associated with a Nucleus-localized Phosphorolytic Nuclease

The exosome is a protein complex consisting of a variety of 3′→5′ exoribonucleases that functions both in the processing of rRNA precursors and in the degradation of mRNA. A prokaryotic counterpart of the exosome known as the degradosome exists in bacteria and chloroplasts. Interestingly, RNA polyadenylation has been implicated in degradosome functioning, giving rise to the possibility of a similar role in exosome function. Using phosphorolytic breakdown of RNA as an assay, we have purified an exosome-like activity from pea nuclear extracts. This activity copurifies with at least one Arabidopsis exosome subunit homologue. Recombinant Arabidopsis poly(A) polymerase and purified chloroplast poly(A) polymerase can polyadenylate RNAs that copurify with the exosome-like activity, even though the quantity of this co-purifying RNA is well below the affinity of the PAPs for free RNA. These results suggest a role for polyadenylation in exosome function, perhaps analogous to the role that polyadenylation plays in facilitating RNA breakdown by the bacterial degradosome.     

Tie me up, tie me down: inhibiting RNA polymerase

Mechanistic understanding of antibiotic action can yield crucial insights that aid in the design of new antibiotics. In this issue, Mukhopadhyay et al. (2008) uncover the mechanism by which the antibiotic myxopyronin inhibits bacterial RNA polymerase, suggesting a new target region in RNA polymerase for inhibitor design.     

Poring over exosome structure

The authors analyse the eukaryotic exosome structure, published in EMBO reports, in light of the known archaeal and prokaryotic exosomes, and discuss its striking flexibility and the conservation of the RNA channelling mechanism.EMBO Rep (2010) advance online publication. doi: 10.1038/embor.2010.164Almost all RNA molecules are processed by RNases to form mature RNAs. In addition, many RNAs are degraded, either because they are no longer needed or because they are aberrant. All of these functions—RNA processing, normal RNA degradation and RNA quality control—are carried out by the eukaryotic RNA exosome complex. In this issue of EMBO reports, the Lorentzen group provide structural insight into the eukaryotic exosome and the mechanism by which it degrades RNA from 3′ to 5′ (Malet et al, 2010).The crystal structures of overlapping parts of the eukaryotic exosome (Liu et al, 2006; Bonneau et al, 2009) and the related bacterial PNPase (Symmons et al, 2000) and archaeal exosome (Lorentzen et al, 2007) have been solved, and show that these RNA-degrading machines from the three domains of life have a similar structure (Fig 1). They are all composed of a ring of six RNase PH domains, one side of which has a cap that contains putative RNA-binding domains. Although this overall structure is conserved, the way that it is formed is not. Bacterial PNPase is a homotrimer of which each monomer contains two RNase PH domains, an S1 domain and a KH domain. The archaeal PH ring consists of three copies of two proteins and the cap is made of three copies of either one of two proteins. Finally, the eukaryotic exosome core is composed of nine proteins: six with one RNase PH domain each and three cap proteins.Open in a separate windowFigure 1Exosome structures. The bacterial PNPase (left), the archaeal exosome (middle) and eukaryotic core exosome (right) have a common overall structure. The top panels are schematic views from above, showing the cap proteins. The bottom panels show a view from the side, with one-third of the exosome cut away to reveal the RNA in the central channel.In PNPase and the archaeal exosome, substrates enter the PH ring from the cap-side. The putative RNA-binding domains of the cap are therefore probably important for controlling entry to the PH ring. In both archaea and bacteria, the active sites are on the inner side of the PH ring and thus the ribonucleic catalysis occurs inside the central channel. However, in humans and yeast each of the RNase PH domains have point mutations that make the exosome ring catalytically inactive (Dziembowski et al, 2007). Instead, catalysis is carried out by a tenth subunit—Rrp44/Dis3—which binds to the PH ring on the opposite side to the cap proteins (Bonneau et al, 2009; Wang et al, 2007). This organization made it unclear whether RNA also enters the central channel of the exosome in eukaryotes (Fig 1), or whether substrate RNAs directly access the catalytic subunit.Malet and colleagues now provide structural information that resolves this by reconstituting the ten-subunit yeast exosome and analysing its structure with electron microscopy, in the presence and absence of RNA. This analysis suggests that the RNase PH ring of the exosome is stable, but that the cap and catalytic subunits are more flexible than previously appreciated. It is the first structural evidence that in eukaryotes RNA is threaded through the central channel before being degraded by Rrp44.     

Yeast Trf5p is a nuclear poly(A) polymerase

Recent analyses have shown that the activity of the yeast nuclear exosome is stimulated by the Trf4p-Air1/2p-Mtr4p polyadenylation (TRAMP) complex. Here, we report that strains lacking the Rrp6p component of the nuclear exosome accumulate polyadenylated forms of many different ribosomal RNA precursors (pre-rRNAs). This polyadenylation is reduced in strains lacking either the poly(A) polymerase Trf4p or its close homologue Trf5p. In contrast, polyadenylation is enhanced by overexpression of Trf5p. Polyadenylation is also markedly increased in strains lacking the RNA helicase Mtr4p, indicating that it is required to couple poly(A) polymerase activity to degradation. Tandem affinity purification-tagged purified Trf5p showed polyadenylation activity in vitro, which was abolished by a double point mutation in the predicted catalytic site. Trf5p co-purified with Mtr4p and Air1p, indicating that it forms a complex, designated TRAMP5, that has functions that partially overlap with the TRAMP complex.     

RNA polyadenylation in Archaea: not observed in Haloferax while the exosome polynucleotidylates RNA in Sulfolobus

The addition of poly(A) tails to RNA is a phenomenon common to all organisms examined so far. No homologues of the known polyadenylating enzymes are found in Archaea and little is known concerning the mechanisms of messenger RNA degradation in these organisms. Hyperthermophiles of the genus Sulfolobus contain a protein complex with high similarity to the exosome, which is known to degrade RNA in eukaryotes. Halophilic Archaea, however, do not encode homologues of these eukaryotic exosome components. In this work, we analysed RNA polyadenylation and degradation in the archaea Sulfolobus solfataricus and Haloferax volcanii. No RNA polyadenylation was detected in the halophilic archaeon H. volcanii. However, RNA polynucleotidylation occurred in hyperthermophiles of the genus Sulfolobus and was mediated by the archaea exosome complex. Together, our results identify the first organism without RNA polyadenylation and show a polyadenylation activity of the archaea exosome.