The Behavioral Ecology of Intermittent Locomotion

Most physiological and ecological approaches to animal locomotionare based on steady state assumptions, yet movements of manyanimals are interspersed with pauses lasting from millisecondsto minutes. Thus, pauses, along with changes in the durationand speed of moves, form part of a dynamic system of intermittentlocomotion by which animals adjust their locomotor behaviorto changing circumstances. Intermittent locomotion occurs ina wide array of organisms from protozoans to mammals. It isfound in aerial, aquatic and terrestrial locomotion and in manybehavioral contexts including search and pursuit of prey, matesearch, escape from predators, habitat assessment and generaltravel. In our survey, animals exhibiting intermittent locomotionpaused on average nearly 50% of their locomotion time (range6–94%). Although intermittent locomotion is usually expectedto increase energetic costs as a result of additional expenditurefor acceleration and deceleration, a variety of energetic benefitscan arise when forward movement continues during pauses. Endurancealso can be improved by partial recovery from fatigue duringpauses. Perceptual benefits can arise because pauses increasethe capacity of the sensory systems to detect relevant stimuli.Several processes, including velocity blur, relative motiondetection, foveation, attention and interference between sensorysystems are probably involved. In animals that do not pause,alternative mechanisms for stabilizing the perceptual fieldare often present. Because movement is an important cue forstimulus detection, pauses can also reduce unwanted detectionby an organism's predators or prey. Several models have attemptedto integrate energetic and perceptual processes, but many challengesremain. Future advances will require improved quantificationof the effects of speed on perception.     

The Human Behavioral Ecology of Contemporary World Issues

Human behavioral ecology (HBE) began as an attempt to explain human economic, reproductive, and social behavior using neodarwinian theory in concert with theory from ecology and economics, and ethnographic methods. HBE has addressed subsistence decision-making, cooperation, life history trade-offs, parental investment, mate choice, and marriage strategies among hunter-gatherers, herders, peasants, and wage earners in rural and urban settings throughout the world. Despite our rich insights into human behavior, HBE has very rarely been used as a tool to help the people with whom we work. This article introduces a special issue of Human Nature which explores the application of HBE to significant world issues through the design and critique of public policy and international development projects. The articles by Tucker, Shenk, Leonetti et al., and Neil were presented at the 104th annual meeting of the American Anthropological Association (AAA) in Washington, D.C., in December 2005, in the first organized session of the nascent Evolutionary Anthropology Section (EAS). We conclude this introduction by summarizing some theoretical challenges to applying HBE, and ways in which evolutionary anthropologists can contribute to solving tough world issues.

Modelling Primate Behavioral Ecology

Models play an important role in any mature science because they force us to make explicit our assumptions about how a phenomenon works and allow us to explore the way in which different variables influence a complex biological system. I review the principal kinds of models that could be used to study primate behavior and ecology: linear programming models, systems models, optimality models, stochastic dynamic programming models and agent-based simulation models. Although less use has been made of modelling in primatology than in some other areas of behavioral ecology, there is considerable scope for exploiting the predictive and explanatory power of models in the field.     

Applying Behavioral Ecology and Behavioral Economics to Conservation and Development Planning: An Example from the Mikea Forest,Madagascar

Governments and non-govermental organizations (NGOs) that plan projects to conserve the environment and alleviate poverty often attempt to modify rural livelihoods by halting activities they judge to be destructive or inefficient and encouraging alternatives. Project planners typically do so without understanding how rural people themselves judge the value of their activities. When the alternatives planners recommend do not replace the value of banned activities, alternatives are unlikely to be adopted, and local people will refuse to participate. Human behavioral ecology and behavioral economics may provide useful tools for generating and evaluating hypotheses for how people value economic activities in their portfolios and potential alternatives. This is demonstrated with a case example from southwestern Madagascar, where plans to create a Mikea Forest National Park began with the elimination of slash-and-burn maize agriculture and the encouragement to plant labor-intensive manioc instead. Future park plans could restrict access to wild tuber patches, hunting small game, and fishing. The value of these activities is considered using observational data informed by optimal foraging theory, and experimental data describing people’s time preference and covariation perception. Analyses suggest that manioc is not a suitable replacement for maize for many Mikea because the two crops differ in terms of labor requirements, delay-to-reward, and covariation with rainfall. Park planners should promote wild tuber foraging and stewardship of tuber patches and the anthropogenic landscapes in which they are found. To conserve small game, planners must provide alternative sources of protein and cash. Little effort should be spent protecting lemurs, as they are rarely eaten and never sold.