Molecular Enzymology of Phage T4 Dam DNA Methyltransferase

This review summarizes the results of a study of the molecular mechanisms of phage T4 DNA adenine methyltransferase (T4Dam) action. T4Dam [EC 2.1.1.72] catalyzes the transfer of a methyl group from S-adenosyl-L-methionine (AdoMet) to N⁶ of the adenine located in the palindromic recognition site GATC. The subunit structure of T4Dam, substrate-binding properties, and kinetic parameters of methylation of a variety of native and modified oligonucleotide duplexes are considered. A kinetic scheme of the reaction was proposed, assuming that T4Dam is isomerized into a catalytically active form. The mechanisms of DNA-induced dimerization of T4Dam, flipping of the target base, reorientation of T4Dam on an asymmetrically methylated recognition site, the effector action of substrates, and processive methylation of extended DNA containing more than one specific site are discussed. The results obtained for T4Dam may provide a better understanding of the action mechanisms of other homologous enzymes including, first and foremost, those of the vast Dam family.     

Structure of the bacteriophage T4 DNA adenine methyltransferase

DNA-adenine methylation at certain GATC sites plays a pivotal role in bacterial and phage gene expression as well as bacterial virulence. We report here the crystal structures of the bacteriophage T4Dam DNA adenine methyltransferase (MTase) in a binary complex with the methyl-donor product S-adenosyl-L-homocysteine (AdoHcy) and in a ternary complex with a synthetic 12-bp DNA duplex and AdoHcy. T4Dam contains two domains: a seven-stranded catalytic domain that harbors the binding site for AdoHcy and a DNA binding domain consisting of a five-helix bundle and a beta-hairpin that is conserved in the family of GATC-related MTase orthologs. Unexpectedly, the sequence-specific T4Dam bound to DNA in a nonspecific mode that contained two Dam monomers per synthetic duplex, even though the DNA contains a single GATC site. The ternary structure provides a rare snapshot of an enzyme poised for linear diffusion along the DNA.     

Heterodimeric DNA methyltransferases as a platform for creating designer zinc finger methyltransferases for targeted DNA methylation in cells

The ability to target methylation to specific genomic sites would further the study of DNA methylation’s biological role and potentially offer a tool for silencing gene expression and for treating diseases involving abnormal hypomethylation. The end-to-end fusion of DNA methyltransferases to zinc fingers has been shown to bias methylation to desired regions. However, the strategy is inherently limited because the methyltransferase domain remains active regardless of whether the zinc finger domain is bound at its cognate site and can methylate non-target sites. We demonstrate an alternative strategy in which fragments of a DNA methyltransferase, compromised in their ability to methylate DNA, are fused to two zinc fingers designed to bind 9 bp sites flanking a methylation target site. Using the naturally heterodimeric DNA methyltransferase M.EcoHK31I, which methylates the inner cytosine of 5′-YGGCCR-3′, we demonstrate that this strategy can yield a methyltransferase capable of significant levels of methylation at the target site with undetectable levels of methylation at non-target sites in Escherichia coli. However, some non-target methylation could be detected at higher expression levels of the zinc finger methyltransferase indicating that further improvements will be necessary to attain the desired exclusive target specificity.     

Symmetry elements in DNA structure important for recognition/methylation by DNA [amino]-methyltransferases

The phage T4Dam and EcoDam DNA-[adenine-N6] methyltransferases (MTases) methylate GATC palindromic sequences, while the BamHI DNA-[cytosine-N4] MTase methylates the GGATCC palindrome (which contains GATC) at the internal cytosine residue. We compared the ability of these enzymes to interact productively with defective duplexes in which individual elements were deleted on one chain. A sharp decrease in k_cat was observed for all three enzymes if a particular element of structural symmetry was disrupted. For the BamHI MTase, integrity of the ATCC was critical, while an intact GAT sequence was necessary for the activity of T4Dam, and an intact GA was necessary for EcoDam. Theoretical alignment of the region of best contacts between the protein and DNA showed that in the case of a palindromic interaction site, a zone covering the 5′-symmetric residues is located in the major groove versus a zone of contact covering the 3′-symmetric residues in the minor groove. Our data fit a simple rule of thumb that the most important contacts are aligned around the methylation target base: if the target base is in the 5′ half of the palindrome, the interaction between the enzyme and the DNA occurs mainly in the major groove; if it is in the 3′ half, the interaction occurs mainly in the minor groove.     

Identification of in vivo DNA targets of chromatin proteins using tethered dam methyltransferase

We have developed a novel technique, named DamID, for the identification of DNA loci that interact in vivo with specific nuclear proteins in eukaryotes. By tethering Escherichia coli DNA adenine methyltransferase (Dam) to a chromatin protein, Dam can be targeted in vivo to native binding sites of this protein, resulting in local DNA methylation. Sites of methylation can subsequently be mapped using methylation-specific restriction enzymes or antibodies. We demonstrate the successful application of DamID both in Drosophila cell cultures and in whole flies. When Dam is tethered to the DNA-binding domain of GAL4, targeted methylation is limited to a region of a few kilobases surrounding a GAL4 binding sequence. Using DamID, we identified a number of expected and unexpected target loci for Drosophila heterochromatin protein 1. DamID has potential for genome-wide mapping of in vivo targets of chromatin proteins in various eukaryotes.     

An analysis of methyltransferase SsoII-DNA contacts in the enzyme-substrate complex

The functional groups of the DNA methylation site that are involved in the DNA interaction with methyltransferase SsoII at the recognition stage were identified. The contacts in the enzyme-substrate complex were analyzed in the presence of S-adenosyl-L-homocysteine using the interference footprinting assay with formic acid, hydrazine, dimethyl sulfate, or N-ethyl-N-nitrosourea as a modifying reagent. It was shown that the replacement of the central A.T by the G.C pair in the methylation site did not affect the enzyme-DNA interaction, whereas the use of a substrate with one chain methylated (monomethylated substrate) instead of the unmethylated substrate dramatically changes the DNA contacts. The binding constants of unmethylated and monomethylated substrates with methyltransferase SsoII in the presence of S-adenosyl-L-homocysteine were calculated.     

Differential methylation kinetics of individual target site strands by T4Dam DNA methyltransferase

Prokaryote DNA methyltransferases (MTases) of the Dam family (including those of bacteriophages T2 and T4) catalyze methyl group transfer from S-adenosyl-L-methionine (AdoMet), producing S-adenosyl-L-homocysteine (AdoHcy) and methylated adenine residues in palindromic GATC sequences. Dam DNA MTases, as all site-specific enzymes interacting with polymeric DNA, require a mechanism of action that ensures a rapid search for specific targets for catalytic action, during both the initial and subsequent rounds of methylation. The results of pre-steady-state (reaction burst) and steady-state methylation analyses of individual targets permitted us to monitor the action of T4Dam, which has three degrees of freedom: sliding, reorientation and adaptation to the canonical GATC sequence. The salient results are as follows: (i) 40mer substrate duplexes containing two canonical GATC sites showed differential methylation of the potential targets, i.e., T4Dam exhibited a preference for one site/target, which may present the better 'kinetic trap' for the enzyme. (ii) Prior hemimethylation of the two sites made both targets equally capable of being methylated during the pre-steady-state reaction. (iii) Although capable of moving in either direction along double-stranded DNA, there are some restrictions on T4Dam reorientation/adaptation on 40mer duplexes.     

Structure and substrate recognition of the Escherichia coli DNA adenine methyltransferase

The structure of the Escherichia coli Dam DNA-(adenine-N6)-methyltransferase in complex with cognate DNA was determined at 1.89 A resolution in the presence of S-adenosyl-L-homocysteine. DNA recognition and the dynamics of base-flipping were studied by site-directed mutagenesis, DNA methylation kinetics and fluorescence stopped-flow experiments. Our data illustrate the mechanism of coupling of DNA recognition and base-flipping. Contacts to the non-target strand in the second (3') half of the GATC site are established by R124 to the fourth base-pair, and by L122 and P134 to the third base-pair. The aromatic ring of Y119 intercalates into the DNA between the second and third base-pairs, which is essential for base-flipping to occur. Compared to previous published structures of bacteriophage T4 Dam, three major new observations are made in E.coli Dam. (1) The first Gua is recognized by K9, removal of which abrogates the first base-pair recognition. (2) The flipped target Ade binds to the surface of EcoDam in the absence of S-adenosyl-L-methionine, which illustrates a possible intermediate in the base-flipping pathway. (3) The orphaned Thy residue displays structural flexibility by adopting an extrahelical or intrahelical position where it is in contact to N120.     

Molecular enzymology of phage T4 Dam DNA-methyltransferase

The review reflects results of studies on the molecular mechanism of phage T4 Dam DNA-methyltransferase action. The enzyme (T4Dam) catalyzes methyl group transfer from S-adenosyl-l-methionine (AdoMet) to N6-adenine position in the palindromic recognition sequence GATC (EC 2.1.1.72). The enzyme subunit structure, substrate-binding and kinetic parameters for a wide range of native and modified oligonucleotide duplexes, as well as steady-state reaction kinetic scheme, included T4Dam isomerization to catalytically active form, are considered. The found mechanisms of DNA induced T4Dam dimerization, target base flipping, enzyme reorientation in an asymmetrically modified recognition sequence, effector action of reaction substrates and processive methylation of DNA substrates, containing more than one specific site, are discussed. The results obtained with T4Dam may be useful for understanding mechanisms of action of other homologous enzymes, most of all for specimens of numerous family of Dam DNA-methyltransferases.     

Determinants of sequence-specific DNA methylation: target recognition and catalysis are coupled in M.HhaI

Sequence specificity studies of the wild-type bacterial DNA cytosine C5 methyltransferase HhaI were carried out with cognate (5'GCGC3') and noncognate DNA substrates containing single base pair changes at the first and the fourth position (underlined). Specificity for noncognate site methylation at the level of kcat/KDDNA is decreased 9000-80000-fold relative to the cognate site, manifested through changes in methylation, or a prior step, and changes in KDDNA. Analysis of a new high-resolution enzyme-DNA cocrystal structure provides a partial mechanistic understanding of this discrimination. To probe the significance of conformational transitions occurring prior to catalysis in determining specificity, we analyzed the double mutant (H127A/T132A). These amino acid substitutions disrupt the interface between the flexible loop (residues 80-99), which interacts with the DNA minor groove, and the active site. The mutant's methylation of the cognate site is essentially unchanged, yet its methylation of noncognate sites is decreased up to 460-fold relative to the wild-type enzyme. We suggest that a significant contribution to M.HhaI's specificity involves the stabilization of reaction intermediates prior to methyl transfer, mediated by DNA minor groove-protein flexible loop interactions.     

Pre-steady state kinetics of bacteriophage T4 dam DNA-[N(6)-adenine] methyltransferase: interaction with native (GATC) or modified sites

The DNA methyltransferase of bacteriophage T4 (T4 Dam MTase) recognizes the palindromic sequence GATC, and catalyzes transfer of the methyl group from S:-adenosyl-L-methionine (AdoMet) to the N(6)-position of adenine [generating N(6)-methyladenine and S:-adenosyl-L-homocysteine (AdoHcy)]. Pre-steady state kinetic analysis revealed that the methylation rate constant k(meth) for unmethylated and hemimethylated substrates (0.56 and 0.47 s(-1), respectively) was at least 20-fold larger than the overall reaction rate constant k(cat) (0.023 s(-1)). This indicates that the release of products is the rate-limiting step in the reaction. Destabilization of the target-base pair did not alter the methylation rate, indicating that the rate of target nucleoside flipping does not limit k(meth). Preformed T4 Dam MTase-DNA complexes are less efficient than preformed T4 Dam MTase-AdoMet complexes in the first round of catalysis. Thus, this data is consistent with a preferred route of reaction for T4 Dam MTase in which AdoMet is bound first; this preferred reaction route is not observed with the DNA-[C5-cytosine]-MTases.     

An epigenetic switch involving overlapping fur and DNA methylation optimizes expression of a type VI secretion gene cluster

Type VI secretion systems (T6SS) are macromolecular machines of the cell envelope of Gram-negative bacteria responsible for bacterial killing and/or virulence towards different host cells. Here, we characterized the regulatory mechanism underlying expression of the enteroagregative Escherichia coli sci1 T6SS gene cluster. We identified Fur as the main regulator of the sci1 cluster. A detailed analysis of the promoter region showed the presence of three GATC motifs, which are target of the DNA adenine methylase Dam. Using a combination of reporter fusion, gel shift, and in vivo and in vitro Dam methylation assays, we dissected the regulatory role of Fur and Dam-dependent methylation. We showed that the sci1 gene cluster expression is under the control of an epigenetic switch depending on methylation: fur binding prevents methylation of a GATC motif, whereas methylation at this specific site decreases the affinity of Fur for its binding box. A model is proposed in which the sci1 promoter is regulated by iron availability, adenine methylation, and DNA replication.     

Comparative studies of the phage T2 and T4 DNA (N6-adenine)methyltransferases: amino acid changes that affect catalytic activity.

The bacteriophage T2 and T4 dam genes code for a DNA (N6-adenine)methyltransferase (MTase). Nonglucosylated, hydroxymethylcytosine-containing T2gt- virion DNA has a higher level of methylation than T4gt- virion DNA does. To investigate the basis for this difference, we compared the intracellular enzyme levels following phage infection as well as the in vitro intrinsic methylation capabilities of purified T2 and T4 Dam MTases. Results from Western blotting (immunoblotting) showed that the same amounts of MTase protein were produced after infection with T2 and T4. Kinetic analyses with purified homogeneous enzymes showed that the two MTases had similar Km values for the methyl donor, S-adenosyl-L-methionine, and for substrate DNA. In contrast, they had different k(cat) values (twofold higher for T2 Dam MTase). We suggest that this difference can account for the ability of T2 Dam to methylate viral DNA in vivo to a higher level than does T4 Dam. Since the T2 and T4 MTases differ at only three amino acid residues (at positions 20 [T4, Ser; T2, Pro], 26 [T4, Asn; T2, Asp], and 188 [T4, Asp; T2, Glu]), we have produced hybrid proteins to determine which residue(s) is responsible for increased catalytic activity. The results of these analyses showed that the residues at positions 20 and 26 are responsible for the different k(cat) values of the two MTases for both canonical and noncanonical sites. Moreover, a single substitution of either residue 20 or 26 was sufficient to increase the k(cat) of T4 Dam.     

The M.EcoRV DNA-(adenine N6)-methyltransferase uses DNA bending for recognition of an expanded EcoDam recognition site

The M.EcoRV DNA methyltransferase recognizes GATATC sites. It is related to EcoDam, which methylates GATC sites. The DNA binding domain of M.EcoRV is similar to that of EcoDam suggesting a similar mechanism of DNA recognition. We show that amino acid residue Lys11 of M.EcoRV is involved in recognition of Gua1 and Arg128 contacts the Gua in base pair 6. These residues correspond to Lys9 and Arg124 in EcoDam, which recognize the Gua residues in both strands of the Dam recognition sequence, indicating that M.EcoRV and EcoDam make similar contacts to outermost base pairs of their recognition sequences and M.EcoRV recognizes its target site as an expanded GATC site. In contrast to EcoDam, M.EcoRV considerably bends the DNA (59+/-4 degrees) suggesting indirect readout of the AT-rich inner sequence. Recognition of an expanded target site by DNA bending is a new principle for changing DNA recognition specificity of proteins during molecular evolution. R128A is inefficient in DNA bending and binding, whereas K11A bends DNA with relaxed sequence specificity. These results suggest a temporal order of the formation of protein-DNA contacts in which the Gua6-Arg128 contact forms early followed by DNA bending and, finally, the formation of the Lys11-Gua1 contact.     

Bacteriophage T4 Dam DNA-[N6-adenine]methyltransferase. Kinetic evidence for a catalytically essential conformational change in the ternary complex.

We carried out a steady state kinetic analysis of the bacteriophage T4 DNA-[N6-adenine]methyltransferase (T4 Dam) mediated methyl group transfer reaction from S-adenosyl-l-methionine (AdoMet) to Ade in the palindromic recognition sequence, GATC, of a 20-mer oligonucleotide duplex. Product inhibition patterns were consistent with a steady state-ordered bi-bi mechanism in which the order of substrate binding and product (methylated DNA, DNA(Me) and S-adenosyl-l-homocysteine, AdoHcy) release was AdoMet downward arrow DNA downward arrow DNA(Me) upward arrow AdoHcy upward arrow. A strong reduction in the rate of methylation was observed at high concentrations of the substrate 20-mer DNA duplex. In contrast, increasing substrate AdoMet concentration led to stimulation in the reaction rate with no evidence of saturation. We propose the following model. Free T4 Dam (initially in conformational form E) randomly interacts with substrates AdoMet and DNA to form a ternary T4 Dam-AdoMet-DNA complex in which T4 Dam has isomerized to conformational state F, which is specifically adapted for catalysis. After the chemical step of methyl group transfer from AdoMet to DNA, product DNA(Me) dissociates relatively rapidly (k(off) = 1.7 x s(-1)) from the complex. In contrast, dissociation of product AdoHcy proceeds relatively slowly (k(off) = 0.018 x s(-1)), indicating that its release is the rate-limiting step, consistent with kcat = 0.015 x s(-1). After AdoHcy release, the enzyme remains in the F conformational form and is able to preferentially bind AdoMet (unlike form E, which randomly binds AdoMet and DNA), and the AdoMet-F binary complex then binds DNA to start another methylation cycle. We also propose an alternative pathway in which the release of AdoHcy is coordinated with the binding of AdoMet in a single concerted event, while T4 Dam remains in the isomerized form F. The resulting AdoMet-F binary complex then binds DNA, and another methylation reaction ensues. This route is preferred at high AdoMet concentrations.     

An Analysis of Methyltransferase SsoII–DNA Contacts in the Enzyme–Substrate Complex

The functional groups of the DNA methylation site that are involved in the DNA interaction with methyltransferase SsoII at the recognition stage were identified. The contacts in the enzyme–substrate complex were analyzed in the presence of S-adenosyl-L-homocysteine using the interference footprinting assay with formic acid, hydrazine, dimethyl sulfate, or N-ethyl-N-nitrosourea as a modifying reagent. It was shown that the replacement of the central A · T by the G · C pair in the methylation site did not affect enzyme–DNA interaction, whereas the use of a substrate with one strand methylated (monomethylated substrate) instead of the unmethylated substrate dramatically changes the DNA contacts. The binding constants of unmethylated and monomethylated substrates with methyltransferase SsoII in the presence of S-adenosyl-L-homocysteine were calculated.     

Mutations that confer de novo activity upon a maintenance methyltransferase.

DNA methyltransferases are not only sequence specific in their action, but they also differentiate between the alternative methylation states of a target site. Some methyltransferases are equally active on either unmethylated or hemimethylated DNA and consequently function as de novo methyltransferases. Others are specific for hemimethylated target sequences, consistent with the postulated role of a maintenance methyltransferase in perpetuating a pattern of DNA modification. The molecular basis for the difference between de novo and maintenance methyltransferase activity is unknown, yet fundamental to cellular activities that are affected by different methylation states of the genome. The methyltransferase activity of the type I restriction and modification system, EcoK, is the only known prokaryotic methyltransferase shown to be specific for hemimethylated target sequences. We have isolated mutants of Escherichia coli K-12 which are able to modify unmethylated target sequences efficiently in a manner indicative of de novo methyltransferase activity. Consistent with this change in specificity, some mutations shift the balance between DNA restriction and modification as if both activities now compete at unmethylated targets. Two genes encode the methyltransferase and all the mutations are loosely clustered within one of them.     

Bacteriophage T4Dam DNA-(adenine-N(6))-methyltransferase. Comparison of pre-steady state and single turnover methylation of 40-mer duplexes containing two (un)modified target sites

We analyzed pre-steady state and single turnover kinetics of bacteriophage T4Dam DNA-(adenine-N(6))-methyltransferase-mediated methyl group transfer from S-adenosyl-l-methionine (AdoMet) to 40-mer duplexes containing native recognition sites (5'-GATC/5'-GATC) or some modified variant(s). The results extend a model from studies with single-site 20-mer duplexes. Under pre-steady state conditions, monomeric T4Dam methyltransferase-AdoMet complexes were capable of rapid methylation of adenine residues in 40-mer duplexes containing two sites. During processive movement of T4Dam to the next site, the rate-limiting step was the exchange of the product S-adenosyl-l-homocysteine (AdoHcy) for AdoMet without T4Dam dissociating from the duplex. Consequently, instead of a single exponential rate dependence, complex methylation curves were obtained with at least two pre-steady state steps. With 40-mer duplexes containing a single target site, the kinetics were simpler, fitting a single exponential followed by a linear steady state phase. Single turnover methylation of 40-mer duplexes also proceeded in two stages. First, two dimeric T4Dam-AdoMet molecules bound, and each catalyzed a two-step methylation. Instead of processive movement of T4Dam, a conformational adaptation occurred. We propose that following methyl transfer to one strand, dimeric (T4Dam-AdoMet)-(T4Dam-AdoHcy) was capable of rapidly reorienting itself and catalyzing methyl transfer to the target adenine on the complementary, unmethylated strand. This second stage methyl transfer occurred at a rate about 25-fold slower than in the first step; it was rate-limited by Dam-AdoHcy dissociation or its clearance from the methylated complementary strand. Under single turnover conditions, there was complete methylation of all target adenine residues with each of the two-site 40-mer duplexes.