RusA Holliday junction resolvase: DNA complex structure--insights into selectivity and specificity

We have determined the structure of a catalytically inactive D70N variant of the Escherichia coli RusA resolvase bound to a duplex DNA substrate that reveals critical protein–DNA interactions and permits a much clearer understanding of the interaction of the enzyme with a Holliday junction (HJ). The RusA enzyme cleaves HJs, the fourway DNA branchpoints formed by homologous recombination, by introducing symmetrical cuts in the phosphodiester backbone in a Mg²⁺ dependent reaction. Although, RusA shows a high level of selectivity for DNA junctions, preferring to bind fourway junctions over other substrates in vitro, it has also been shown to have appreciable affinity for duplex DNA. However, RusA does not show DNA cleavage activity with duplex substrates. Our structure suggests the possible basis for structural selectivity as well as sources of the sequence specificity observed for DNA cleavage by RusA.     

Recognition and manipulation of branched DNA by the RusA Holliday junction resolvase of Escherichia coli.

Homologous recombination is a fundamental cellular process that shapes and reshapes the genomes of all organisms and promotes repair of damaged DNA. A key step in this process is the resolution of Holliday junctions formed by homologous DNA pairing and strand exchange. In Escherichia coli , a Holliday junction is processed into recombinant products by the concerted activities of the RuvA and RuvB proteins, which together drive branch migration, and RuvC endonuclease, which resolves the structure. In the absence of RuvABC, recombination can be promoted by increasing the expression of the RusA endonuclease, a Holliday junction resolvase encoded by a cryptic prophage gene. Here, we describe the DNA binding properties of RusA. We found that RusA was highly selective for branched molecules and formed complexes with these structures even in the presence of a large excess of linear duplex DNA. However, it does bind weakly to linear duplex DNA. Under conditions where there was no detectable binding to duplex DNA, RusA formed a highly structured complex with a synthetic Holliday junction that was remarkably stable and insensitive to divalent metal ions. The duplex arms were found to adopt a specific alignment within this complex that approximated to a tetrahedral conformation of the junction.     

RuvAB and RecG are not essential for the recovery of DNA synthesis following UV-induced DNA damage in Escherichia coli

Ultraviolet light induces DNA lesions that block the progression of the replication machinery. Several models speculate that the resumption of replication following disruption by UV-induced DNA damage requires regression of the nascent DNA or migration of the replication machinery away from the blocking lesion to allow repair or bypass of the lesion to occur. Both RuvAB and RecG catalyze branch migration of three- and four-stranded DNA junctions in vitro and are proposed to catalyze fork regression in vivo. To examine this possibility, we characterized the recovery of DNA synthesis in ruvAB and recG mutants. We found that in the absence of either RecG or RuvAB, arrested replication forks are maintained and DNA synthesis is resumed with kinetics that are similar to those in wild-type cells. The data presented here indicate that RecG- or RuvAB-catalyzed fork regression is not essential for DNA synthesis to resume following arrest by UV-induced DNA damage in vivo.     

DNA double strand break repair and crossing over mediated by RuvABC resolvase and RecG translocase

DNA double-strand breaks threaten the stability of the genome, and yet are induced deliberately during meiosis in order to provoke homologous recombination and generate the crossovers needed to promote faithful chromosome transmission. Crossovers are secured via biased resolution of the double Holliday junction intermediates formed when both ends of the broken chromosome engage an intact homologue. To investigate whether the enzymes catalysing branch migration and resolution of Holliday junctions are directed to favour production of either crossover or noncrossover products, we engineered a genetic system based on DNA breakage induced by the I-SceI endonuclease to detect analogous exchanges in Escherichia coli where the enzymology of recombination is more fully understood. Analysis of the recombinants generated revealed approximately equal numbers of crossover and noncrossover products, regardless of whether repair is mediated via RecG, RuvABC, or the RusA resolvase. We conclude that there little or no control of crossing over at the level of Holliday junction resolution. Thus, if similar resolvases function during meiosis, additional factors must act to bias recombination in favour of crossover progeny.     

Processing of recombination intermediates by the RecG and RuvAB proteins of Escherichia coli.

The RuvAB, RuvC and RecG proteins of Escherichia coli process intermediates in recombination and DNA repair into mature products. RuvAB and RecG catalyse branch migration of Holliday junctions, while RuvC resolves these structures by nuclease cleavage around the point of strand exchange. The overlap between RuvAB and RecG was investigated using synthetic X- and Y-junctions. RuvAB is a complex of RuvA and RuvB, with RuvA providing the DNA binding subunit and RuvB the ATPase activity that drives branch migration. Both RuvA and RecG form defined complexes with each of the junctions. The gel mobilities of these complexes suggests that the X-junction attracts two tetramers of RuvA, but mainly monomers of RecG. Dissociation of the junction in the presence of ATP requires high levels of RuvAB. RecG is shown to have a much higher specific activity to the extent that very little of this protein would be required to match RuvAB in vivo. Both proteins also dissociate a Y-junction, which is consistent with helicase activity. However, RecG shows no ability to unwind more conventional substrates and the suggestion is made that its helicase activity is directed towards specific DNA structures such as junctions.     

The RuvAB branch migration translocase and RecU Holliday junction resolvase are required for double-stranded DNA break repair in Bacillus subtilis

In models of Escherichia coli recombination and DNA repair, the RuvABC complex directs the branch migration and resolution of Holliday junction DNA. To probe the validity of the E. coli paradigm, we examined the impact of mutations in DeltaruvAB and DeltarecU (a ruvC functional analog) on DNA repair. Under standard transformation conditions we failed to construct DeltaruvAB DeltarecG, DeltarecU DeltaruvAB, DeltarecU DeltarecG, or DeltarecU DeltarecJ strains. However, DeltaruvAB could be combined with addAB (recBCD), recF, recH, DeltarecS, DeltarecQ, and DeltarecJ mutations. The DeltaruvAB and DeltarecU mutations rendered cells extremely sensitive to DNA-damaging agents, although less sensitive than a DeltarecA strain. When damaged cells were analyzed, we found that RecU was recruited to defined double-stranded DNA breaks (DSBs) and colocalized with RecN. RecU localized to these centers at a later time point during DSB repair, and formation was dependent on RuvAB. In addition, expression of RecU in an E. coli ruvC mutant restored full resistance to UV light only when the ruvAB genes were present. The results demonstrate that, as with E. coli RuvABC, RuvAB targets RecU to recombination intermediates and that all three proteins are required for repair of DSBs arising from lesions in chromosomal DNA.     

DNA binding by the substrate specificity (wedge) domain of RecG helicase suggests a role in processivity

RecG differs from most helicases acting on branched DNA in that it is thought to catalyze unwinding via translocation of a monomer on dsDNA, with a wedge domain facilitating strand separation. Conserved phenylalanines in the wedge are shown to be critical for DNA binding. When detached from the helicase domains, the wedge bound a Holliday junction with high affinity but failed to bind a replication fork structure. Further stabilizing contacts are identified in full-length RecG, which may explain fork binding. Detached from the wedge, the helicase region unwound junctions but had extremely low substrate affinity, arguing against the "classical inchworm" mode of translocation. We propose that the processivity of RecG on branched DNA substrates is dependent on the ability of the wedge to establish strong binding at the branch point. This keeps the helicase motor in contact with the substrate, enabling it to drive dsDNA translocation with high efficiency.     

Analysis of conserved basic residues associated with DNA binding (Arg69) and catalysis (Lys76) by the RusA holliday junction resolvase

Holliday junctions are key intermediates in both homologous recombination and DNA repair, and are also formed from replication forks stalled at lesions in the template strands. Their resolution is critical for chromosome segregation and cell viability, and is mediated by a class of small, homodimeric endonucleases that bind the structure and cleave the DNA. All the enzymes studied require divalent metal ions for strand cleavage and their active centres are characterised by conserved aspartate/glutamate residues that provide ligands for metal binding. Sequence alignments reveal that they also contain a number of conserved basic residues. We used site-directed mutagenesis to investigate such residues in the RusA resolvase. RusA is a 120 amino acid residue polypeptide that can be activated in Escherichia coli to promote recombination and repair in the absence of the Ruv proteins. The RuvA, RuvB and RuvC proteins form a complex on Holliday junction DNA that drives coupled branch migration (RuvAB) and resolution (RuvC) reactions. In contrast to RuvC, the RusA resolvase does not interact directly with a branch migration motor, which simplifies analysis of its resolution activity. Catalysis depends on three highly conserved acidic residues (Asp70, Asp72 and Asp91) that define the catalytic centre. We show that Lys76, which is invariant in RusA sequences, is essential for catalysis, but not for DNA binding, and that an invariant asparagine residue (Asn73) is required for optimal activity. Analysis of DNA binding revealed that RusA may interact with one face of an open junction before manipulating its conformation in the presence of Mg(2+) as part of the catalytic process. A well-conserved arginine residue (Arg69) is linked with this critical stage. These findings provide the first insights into the roles played by basic residues in DNA binding and catalysis by a Holliday junction resolvase.     

Substrate specificity of human methylpurine DNA N-glycosylase

The activity of human methylpurine DNA N-glycosylase (hMPG) for major substrates was directly compared using two types of substrates, i.e., natural DNA and synthetic oligonucleotides. By the use of ARP assay detecting abasic sites in DNA, we first investigated the activity on the natural DNA substrates containing methylpurines, ethenopurines, or hypoxanthine (Hx) prepared by the conventional methods. After the treatment with hMPG, the amount of AP sites in methylated DNA was much higher than that in DNA containing ethenopurines or Hx. The oligodeoxynucleotide having a single 7-methylguanine (7-mG) was newly synthesized in addition to 1, N(6)-ethenoadenine (epsilonA)-, Hx-, and 8-oxoguanine-containing oligonucleotides. 7-mG was effectively excised by hMPG, though it might be less toxic than the other methylated bases with respect to mutagenesis and cell killing. The kinetic study demonstrated that k(cat)/K(m) ratios of the enzyme for epsilonA, Hx, and 7-mG were 2.5 x 10(-3), 1.4 x 10(-3), and 4 x 10(-4) min(-1) nM(-1), respectively. The oligonucleotides containing epsilonA effectively competed against 7-mG, while Hx substrates showed unexpectedly low competition. Concerning the effect of the base opposite damage, hMPG much preferred Hx.T to other Hx pairs, and epsilonA.C and epsilonA.A pairs were better substrates than epsilonA.T.     

The structure of Escherichia coli RusA endonuclease reveals a new Holliday junction DNA binding fold

Holliday junction resolution performed by a variety of structure-specific endonucleases is a key step in DNA recombination and repair. It is believed that all resolvases carry out their reaction chemistries in a similar fashion, utilizing a divalent cation to facilitate the hydrolysis of the phosphodiester backbone of the DNA, but their architecture varies. To date, with the exception of bacteriophage T4 endonuclease VII, each of the known resolvase enzyme structures has been categorized into one of two families: the integrases and the nucleases. We have now determined the structure of the Escherichia coli RusA Holliday junction resolvase, which reveals a fourth structural class for these enzymes. The structure suggests that dimer formation is essential for Mg(2+) cation binding and hence catalysis and that like the other resolvases, RusA distorts its Holliday junction target upon binding. Key residues identified by mutagenesis experiments are well positioned to interact with the DNA.     

Substrate specificity and properties of methyl-directed site-specific DNA endonucleases

Methyl-directed site-specific DNA endonucleases (MD endonucleases) are a small group of enzymes that specifically cleave only methylated DNA. The group includes N6-methyladenine- and 5-methylcytosine-directed enzymes. Although poorly understood, MD endonucleases are of interest for both basic research and application in biotechnology and epigenomics. The review for the first time summarizes the properties of MD endonucleases and considers their role in the bacterial cell and their possible uses in biotechnology and epigenomics.     

Mechanism of translocation and kinetics of DNA unwinding by the helicase RecG

RecG is a DNA helicase involved in the repair of damage at a replication fork and catalyzes the reversal of the fork to a point beyond the damage in the template strand. It unwinds duplex DNA in reactions that are coupled to ATP hydrolysis. The kinetic mechanism of duplex DNA unwinding by RecG was analyzed using a quantitative fluorescence assay based on the process of contact quenching between Cy3 and Dabcyl groups attached to synthetic three-way DNA junctions. The data show that the protein moves at a rate of 26 bp s(-1) along the duplex DNA during the unwinding process. RecG ATPase activity during translocation indicates a constant rate of 7.6 s(-1), measured using a fluorescent phosphate sensor, MDCC-PBP. These two rates imply a movement of approximately 3 bp per ATP hydrolyzed. We demonstrate in several trapping experiments that RecG remains attached to DNA after translocation to the end of the arm of the synthetic DNA junction. ATPase activity continues after translocation is complete. Dissociation of RecG from the product DNA occurs only very slowly, suggesting strong interactions between them. The data support the idea that interactions of the duplex template arm with the protein are the major sites of binding and production of translocation.     

Structural analysis of DNA replication fork reversal by RecG

The stalling of DNA replication forks that occurs as a consequence of encountering DNA damage is a critical problem for cells. RecG protein is involved in the processing of stalled replication forks, and acts by reversing the fork past the damage to create a four-way junction that allows template switching and lesion bypass. We have determined the crystal structure of RecG bound to a DNA substrate that mimics a stalled replication fork. The structure not only reveals the elegant mechanism used by the protein to recognize junctions but has also trapped the protein in the initial stage of fork reversal. We propose a mechanism for how forks are processed by RecG to facilitate replication fork restart. In addition, this structure suggests that the mechanism and function of the two largest helicase superfamilies are distinct.     

The role of RuvA octamerization for RuvAB function in vitro and in vivo

RuvA plays an essential role in branch migration of the Holliday junction by RuvAB as part of the RuvABC pathway for processing Holliday junctions in Escherichia coli. Two types of RuvA-Holliday junction complexes have been characterized: 1) complex I containing a single RuvA tetramer and 2) complex II in which the junction is sandwiched between two RuvA tetramers. The functional differences between the two forms are still not clear. To investigate the role of RuvA octamerization, we introduced three amino acid substitutions designed to disrupt the E. coli RuvA tetramer-tetramer interface as identified by structural studies. The mutant RuvA was tetrameric and interacted with both RuvB and junction DNA but, as predicted, formed complex I only at protein concentrations up to 500 nm. We present biochemical and surface plasmon resonance evidence for functional and physical interactions of the mutant RuvA with RuvB and RuvC on synthetic junctions. The mutant RuvA with RuvB showed DNA helicase activity and could support branch migration of synthetic four-way and three-way junctions. However, junction binding and the efficiency of branch migration of four-way junctions were affected. The activity of the RuvA mutant was consistent with a RuvAB complex driven by one RuvB hexamer only and lead us to propose that one RuvA tetramer can only support the activity of one RuvB hexamer. Significantly, the mutant failed to complement the UV sensitivity of E. coli DeltaruvA cells. These results indicate strongly that RuvA octamerization is essential for the full biological activity of RuvABC.     

Substrate specificity in vivo and in vitro in the formation of stilbenes. Biosynthesis of rhaponticin

The biosynthesis of the stilbene glucoside rhaponticin (3,5,3′-trihydroxy-4′-methoxystilbene 3-O-β-d-glucoside), a constituent of rhubarb (Rheum rhaponticum), was localized in the rhizome. Acetate and various phenylpropane derivatives were tested as precursors in feeding experiments. p-Coumaric acid was more efficiently incorporated than isoferulic acid, resveratrol (3,5,4′-trihydroxystilbene) was found to be the best precursor of rhaponticin. In vitro, for the stilbene-synthesizing system an even higher selectivity in favor of the p-hydroxy compound was observed. When various cinnamoyl-CoA derivatives were tested, membrane-bound enzyme preparations from rhizome converted at pH 7.5p-coumaroyl-CoA into resveratrol whereas rhapontigenin was not formed from isoferuloyl-CoA. Caffeoyl-CoA was converted to astringenin, but with lower rates and at a more acidic pH. The stilbene skeleton is, therefore, synthesized from a phenylpropane moiety carrying a 4′-hydroxysubstitution, while further derivatization to the 3′-hydroxy-4′-methoxy structure takes place at the level of stilbenes.     

Characterization of the ATPase activity of the Escherichia coli RecG protein reveals that the preferred cofactor is negatively supercoiled DNA

RecG is a member of the superfamily 2 helicase family. Its possible role in vivo is ATP hydrolysis driven regression of stalled replication forks. To gain mechanistic insight into how this is achieved, a coupled spectrophotometric assay was utilized to characterize the ATPase activity of RecG in vitro. The results demonstrate an overwhelming preference for negatively supercoiled DNA ((-)scDNA) as a cofactor for the hydrolysis of ATP. In the presence of (-)scDNA the catalytic efficiency of RecG and the processivity (as revealed through heparin trapping), were higher than on any other cofactor examined. The activity of RecG on (-)scDNA was not due to the presence of single-stranded regions functioning as loading sites for the enzyme as relaxed circular DNA treated with DNA gyrase, resulted in the highest levels of ATPase activity. Relaxation of (-)scDNA by a topoisomerase resulted in a 12-fold decrease in ATPase activity, comparable to that observed on both linear double-stranded (ds)DNA and (+)scDNA. In addition to the elevated activity in the presence of (-)scDNA, RecG also has high activity on model 4Y-substrates (i.e. chicken foot structures). This is due largely to the high apparent affinity of the enzyme for this DNA substrate, which is 46-fold higher than a 2Y-substrate (i.e. a three-way with two single-stranded (ss)DNA arms). Finally, the enzyme exhibited significant, but lower activity on ssDNA. This activity was enhanced by the Escherichia coli stranded DNA-binding protein (SSB) protein, which occurs through stabilizing of the binding of RecG to ssDNA. Stabilization is not afforded by the bacteriophage gene 32 protein, indicating a species specific, protein-protein interaction is involved. These results combine to provide significant insight into the manner and timing of the interaction of RecG with DNA at stalled replication forks.     

Site-specific recombination by mutants of Tn21 resolvase with DNA recognition functions from Tn3 resolvase

The resolvases from the transposons Tn3 and Tn21 are homologous proteins but they possess distinct specificities for the DNA sequence at their respective res sites. The DNA binding domain of resolvase contains an amino acid sequence that can be aligned with the helix-turn-helix motif of other DNA binding proteins. Mutations in the gene for Tn21 resolvase were made by replacing the section of DNA that codes for the helix-turn-helix with synthetic oligonucleotides. Each mutation substituted one amino acid in Tn21 resolvase with either the corresponding residue from Tn3 resolvase or a residue that lacks hydrogen bonding functions. The ability of these proteins to mediate recombination between res sites from either Tn21 or Tn3 was measured in vivo and in vitro. With one exception, where a glutamate residue had been replaced by leucine, the activity of these mutants was similar to that of wild-type Tn21 resolvase. A further mutation was made in which the complete recognition helix of Tn21 resolvase was replaced with that from Tn3 resolvase. This protein retained activity in recombining Tn21 res sites, though at a reduced level relative to wild-type; the reduction can be assigned entirely to weakened binding to this DNA. Neither this mutant nor any other derivative of Tn21 resolvase had any detectable activity for recombination between res sites from Tn3. The exchange of this section of amino acid sequence between the two resolvases is therefore insufficient to alter the DNA sequence specificity for recombination.     

Substrate specificity of plant UDP-dependent glycosyltransferases predicted from crystal structures and homology modeling

Plant family 1 UDP-dependent glycosyltransferases (UGTs) catalyze the glycosylation of a plethora of bioactive natural products. In Arabidopsis thaliana, 120 UGT encoding genes have been identified. The crystal-based 3D structures of four plant UGTs have recently been published. Despite low sequence conservation, the UGTs show a highly conserved secondary and tertiary structure. The sugar acceptor and sugar donor substrates of UGTs are accommodated in the cleft formed between the N- and C-terminal domains. Several regions of the primary sequence contribute to the formation of the substrate binding pocket including structurally conserved domains as well as loop regions differing both with respect to their amino acid sequence and sequence length. In this review we provide a detailed analysis of the available plant UGT crystal structures to reveal structural features determining substrate specificity. The high 3D structural conservation of the plant UGTs render homology modeling an attractive tool for structure elucidation. The accuracy and utility of UGT structures obtained by homology modeling are discussed and quantitative assessments of model quality are performed by modeling of a plant UGT for which the 3D crystal structure is known. We conclude that homology modeling offers a high degree of accuracy. Shortcomings in homology modeling are also apparent with modeling of loop regions remaining as a particularly difficult task.