Mutants in the Dictyostelium Arp2/3 complex and chemoattractant-induced actin polymerization

We have investigated the role of the Arp2/3 complex in Dictyostelium cell chemotaxis towards cyclic-AMP and in the actin polymerization that is triggered by this chemoattractant. We confirm that the Arp2/3 complex is recruited to the cell perimeter, or into a pseudopod, after cyclic-AMP stimulation and that this is coincident with actin polymerization. This recruitment is inhibited when actin polymerization is blocked using latrunculin suggesting that the complex binds to pre-existing actin filaments, rather than to a membrane associated signaling complex. We show genetically that an intact Arp2/3 complex is essential in Dictyostelium and have produced partially active mutants in two of its subunits. In these mutants both phases of actin polymerization in response to cyclic-AMP are greatly reduced. One mutant projects pseudopodia more slowly than wild type and has impaired chemotaxis, together with slower movement. The second mutant chemotaxes poorly due to an adhesion defect, suggesting that the Arp2/3 complex plays a crucial part in adhering cells to the substratum as they move. We conclude that the Arp2/3 complex largely mediates the actin polymerization response to chemotactic stimulation and contributes to cell motility, pseudopod extension and adhesion in Dictyostelium chemotaxis.     

Cortactin interacts with WIP in regulating Arp2/3 activation and membrane protrusion

BACKGROUND: Modulation of actin cytoskeleton assembly is an integral step in many cellular events. A key regulator of actin polymerization is Arp2/3 complex. Cortactin, an F-actin binding protein that localizes to membrane ruffles, is an activator of Arp2/3 complex. RESULTS: A yeast two-hybrid screen revealed the interaction of the cortactin Src homology 3 (SH3) domain with a peptide fragment derived from a cDNA encoding a region of WASp-Interacting Protein (WIP). GST-cortactin interacted with WIP in an SH3-dependent manner. The subcellular localization of cortactin and WIP coincided at the cell periphery. WIP increased the efficiency of cortactin-mediated Arp2/3 complex activation of actin polymerization in a concentration-dependent manner. Lastly, coexpression of cortactin and WIP stimulated membrane protrusions. CONCLUSIONS: WIP, a protein involved in filopodia formation, binds to both actin monomers and cortactin. Thus, recruitment of actin monomers to a cortactin-activated Arp2/3 complex likely leads to the observed increase in cortactin activation of Arp2/3 complex by WIP. These data suggest that a cortactin-WIP complex functions in regulating actin-based structures at the cell periphery.     

Interaction of SPIN90 with the Arp2/3 complex mediates lamellipodia and actin comet tail formation

The appropriate regulation of the actin cytoskeleton is essential for cell movement, changes in cell shape, and formation of membrane protrusions like lamellipodia and filopodia. Moreover, several regulatory proteins affecting actin dynamics have been identified in the motile regions of cells. Here, we provide evidence for the involvement of SPIN90 in the regulation of actin cytoskeleton and actin comet tail formation. SPIN90 was distributed throughout the cytoplasm in COS-7 cells, but exposing the cells to platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) caused a redistribution of SPIN90 to the cell cortex and the formation of lamellipodia (or membrane ruffles), both of which were dramatically inhibited in SPIN90-knockdown cells. In addition, the binding of the C terminus of SPIN90 with both the Arp2/3 complex (actin-related proteins Arp 2 and Arp 3) and G-actin activates the former, leading to actin polymerization in vitro. And when coexpressed with phosphatidylinositol 4-phosphate 5 kinase, SPIN90 was observed within actin comet tails. Taken these findings suggest that SPIN90 participates in reorganization of the actin cytoskeleton and in actin-based cell motility.     

A Gβγ effector, ElmoE, transduces GPCR signaling to the actin network during chemotaxis

Activation of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) leads to the dissociation of heterotrimeric G-proteins into Gα and Gβγ subunits, which go on to regulate various effectors involved in a panoply of cellular responses. During chemotaxis, Gβγ subunits regulate actin assembly and migration, but the protein(s) linking Gβγ to the actin cytoskeleton remains unknown. Here, we identified a Gβγ effector, ElmoE in Dictyostelium, and demonstrated that it is required for GPCR-mediated chemotaxis. Remarkably, ElmoE associates with Gβγ and Dock-like proteins to activate the small GTPase Rac, in a GPCR-dependent manner, and also associates with Arp2/3 complex and F-actin. Thus, ElmoE serves as a link between chemoattractant GPCRs, G-proteins and the actin cytoskeleton. The pathway, consisting of GPCR, Gβγ, Elmo/Dock, Rac, and Arp2/3, spatially guides the growth of dendritic actin networks in pseudopods of eukaryotic cells during chemotaxis.     

A subset of dynamic actin rearrangements in Drosophila requires the Arp2/3 complex

The Arp2/3 complex has been shown to dramatically increase the slow spontaneous rate of actin filament nucleation in vitro, and it is known to be important for remodeling the actin cytoskeleton in vivo. We isolated and characterized loss of function mutations in genes encoding two subunits of the Drosophila Arp2/3 complex: Arpc1, which encodes the homologue of the p40 subunit, and Arp3, encoding one of the two actin-related proteins. We used these mutations to study how the Arp2/3 complex contributes to well-characterized actin structures in the ovary and the pupal epithelium. We found that the Arp2/3 complex is required for ring canal expansion during oogenesis but not for the formation of parallel actin bundles in nurse cell cytoplasm and bristle shaft cells. The requirement for Arp2/3 in ring canals indicates that the polymerization of actin filaments at the ring canal plasma membrane is important for driving ring canal growth.     

Actin-cytoskeleton dynamics in non-monotonic cell spreading

The spreading of motile cells on a substrate surface is accompanied by reorganization of their actin network. We show that spreading in the highly motile cells of Dictyostelium is non-monotonic, and thus differs from the passage of spreading cells through a regular series of stages. Quantification of the gain and loss of contact area revealed fluctuating forces of protrusion and retraction that dominate the interaction of Dictyostelium cells with a substrate. The molecular basis of these fluctuations is elucidated by dual-fluorescence labeling of filamentous actin together with proteins that highlight specific activities in the actin system. Front-to-tail polarity is established by the sorting out of myosin-II from regions where dense actin assemblies are accumulating. Myosin-IB identifies protruding front regions, and the Arp2/3 complex localizes to lamellipodia protruded from the fronts. Coronin is used as a sensitive indicator of actin disassembly to visualize the delicate balance of polymerization and depolymerization in spreading cells. Short-lived actin patches that co-localize with clathrin suggest that membrane internalization occurs even when the substrate-attached cell surface expands. We conclude that non-monotonic cell spreading is characterized by spatiotemporal patterns formed by motor proteins together with regulatory proteins that either promote or terminate actin polymerization on the scale of seconds.Key words: actin cytoskeleton, Arp 2/3 complex, cell adhesion, cell spreading, Coronin, Dictyostelium, myosin, self-organization, clathrin     

Interaction between Tiam1 and the Arp2/3 complex links activation of Rac to actin polymerization

The Rac-specific GEF (guanine-nucleotide exchange factor) Tiam1 (T-lymphoma invasion and metastasis 1) regulates migration, cell-matrix and cell-cell adhesion by modulating the actin cytoskeleton through the GTPase, Rac1. Using yeast two-hybrid screening and biochemical assays, we found that Tiam1 interacts with the p21-Arc [Arp (actin-related protein) complex] subunit of the Arp2/3 complex. Association occurred through the N-terminal pleckstrin homology domain and the adjacent coiled-coil region of Tiam1. As a result, Tiam1 co-localizes with the Arp2/3 complex at sites of actin polymerization, such as epithelial cell-cell contacts and membrane ruffles. Deletion of the p21-Arc-binding domain in Tiam1 impairs its subcellular localization and capacity to activate Rac1, suggesting that binding to the Arp2/3 complex is important for the function of Tiam1. Indeed, blocking Arp2/3 activation with a WASP (Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome protein) inhibitor leads to subcellular relocalization of Tiam1 and decreased Rac activation. Conversely, functionally active Tiam1, but not a GEF-deficient mutant, promotes activation of the Arp2/3 complex and its association with cytoskeletal components, indicating that Tiam1 and Arp2/3 are mutually dependent for their correct localization and signalling. Our data suggests a model in which the Arp2/3 complex acts as a scaffold to localize Tiam1, and thereby Rac activity, which are both required for activation of the Arp2/3 complex and further Arp2/3 recruitment. This 'self-amplifying' signalling module involving Tiam1, Rac and the Arp2/3 complex could thus drive actin polymerization at specific sites in cells that are required for dynamic morphological changes.     

Caldesmon inhibits Arp2/3-mediated actin nucleation

The Arp2/3 complex greatly accelerates actin polymerization, which is thought to play a major role in cell motility by inducing membrane protrusions including ruffling movements. Membrane ruffles contain a variety of actin-binding proteins, which would modulate Arp2/3-dependent actin polymerization. However, their exact roles in actin polymerization remain to be established. Because caldesmon is present in membrane ruffles, as well as in stress fibers, it may alter Arp2/3-mediated actin polymerization. We have found that caldesmon greatly retards Arp2/3-induced actin polymerization. Kinetic analyses have revealed that caldesmon inhibits the nucleation process, whereas it does not largely reduce elongation. Caldesmon is found to inhibit binding of Arp2/3 to F-actin, which apparently reduces the ability of F-actin as a secondary activator of Arp2/3-mediated nucleation. We also have found that the inhibition of the binding between actin and caldesmon either by Ca(2+)/calmodulin or by phosphorylation with cdc2 kinase reverses the inhibitory effect of caldesmon on Arp2/3-induced actin polymerization. Our results suggest that caldesmon may be a key protein that modulates membrane ruffling and that this may involve changes in caldesmon phosphorylation and/or intracellular calcium concentrations during signal transduction.     

Regulation of the Actin Cytoskeleton Transformation in the Cell by ARP2/3 Complex. Review

The cytoskeleton is formed by a network of protein filaments, including microtubules, actin filaments and intermediate filaments. Filaments permeate the entire cytoplasm; they are involved in maintaining the cell shape, they organize and anchor the organelles, they control the transport of various molecules, cell division and provide signal transduction. To implement these diverse and complex functions, the components of the cytoskeleton must be very dynamic and mobile, be able to rebuilt quickly and interact with each other. This is due to the presence of a large number of actin-binding proteins—nucleators, activators, inactivators of polymerization and depolymerization of actin filaments. This review describes the regulation of actin dynamics by the Arp2/3 complex. In the cell, this complex is in an inactive state. Its activation occurs after it’s interaction with activators. Activators change the conformation and spatial arrangement of the domains of the Arp2/3 complex, providing its interaction with the monomeric and polymeric actin. Activators of the Arp2/3 complex have been known for a long time and include such proteins as WASp and WAVE. All activators possess a specific VCA domain, which is responsible for their binding to the Arp2/3 complex. The structure of the complex with bound activators has been studied using various physical-chemical methods. The inactivators of the complex only recently attracted specific attention of the investigators. At present, at least five different proteins are known to inactivate the Arp2/3 complex by binding to its various subunits. Examples of inactivators are coronin, Gmf and arpin. The structure of the Arp2/3 complex with inactivators was recently published and showed that despite their binding to different subunits of the complex, all inactivators transform the Arp2/3 complex into an “open” state, moving the actin-like Arp subunits apart from each other. Studies of the spatial organization of actin-binding proteins are necessary for understanding the patterns of interaction between them while providing the vital activity of the cell. These data can later be used in the search for new ligands to prevent metastasis of tumor cells.     

Characterization of Arp2/3 complex in chicken tissues

Arp2/3 protein complex consists of seven subunits (Arp2, Arp3, p41-Arc, p34-Arc, p21-Arc, p20-Arc and p16-Arc) in apparent 1:1 stoichiometry. This complex has been shown to promote the formation of Y-branch structures of F-actin in cultured cells. We generated specific antibodies against chicken Arp2, Arp3, and p34-Arc to analyze the distribution of these subunits in chicken tissues.In whole samples of brain and gizzard, antibodies against each recombinant protein reacted with single bands of predicted molecular mass based on their cDNA sequences of the antigens. Anti-p34-Arc antibody detected at least two neighboring spots in 2D-PAGE, which might suggest the existence of isoforms or modified forms. Arp2/3 complex bound to an F-actin affinity column from gizzard extract. However, Arp2/3 complex did not tightly bind major actin cytoskeleton because the complex was extracted easily when gizzard smooth muscle was homogenized in PBS. Immunoblot analysis of various tissues revealed that the amounts of Arp2/3 subunits were lower in striated muscle than in non-muscle and smooth muscle tissues. Amounts and ratio of the three subunits varied in tissues, as estimated by quantitative immunoblotting. With immunofluorescence microscopy, we also observed localization of Arp3 and p34-Arc in frozen sections of gizzard with different staining patterns around blood vessels. These results suggest that the Arp2/3 complex exists also in places where rapid actin polymerization does not occur, and that a part of the subunits may exist in different forms from the complex containing the seven subunits in some tissues.     

Structure and function of the Arp2/3 complex.

The Arp2/3 complex is a ubiquitous and essential component of the actin cytoskeleton in eukaryotic cells. It nucleates actin filaments, caps their pointed ends and cross-links them into orthogonal networks. In amoeba, vertebrates and fungi, the complex consists of actin-related proteins Arp2 and Arp3 and individual copies of five novel polypeptides. The Arps are thought to mediate pointed-end capping and nucleation. Chemical cross-linking implicates three subunits in binding the complex to the side of another actin filament.     

WAVE and Arp2/3 jointly inhibit filopodium formation by entering into a complex with mDia2

Lamellipodia/ruffles and filopodia are protruding organelles containing short and highly branched or long and unbranched actin filaments, respectively. The microscopic morphology, dynamic development and protein signature of both lamellipodia/ruffles and filopodia have been investigated; however, little is known about the mechanisms by which cells coordinate the formation of these actin-based extensions. Here, we show that WAVE holds mDia2 and the Arp2/3 complex in a multimolecular complex. WAVE- and Arp2/3-dependent ruffling induced by EGF does not require mDia2. Conversely, the emission of mDia2-dependent filopodia correlates with its disengagement from WAVE. Consistently, the ability of EGF, Cdc42 and serum to induce mDia2-dependent formation of filopodia is increased in the absence of either the WAVE/Abi1/Nap1/PIR121 (WANP) or the Arp2/3 complex. Reintroduction of WAVE2 into WANP-complex knockdown cells markedly reduces filopodia formation independently of actin polymerization. Thus, WAVE and the Arp2/3 complex jointly orchestrate different types of actin-based plasma membrane protrusions by promoting ruffling and inhibiting mDia2-induced filopodia.     

Coronins: the return of the crown

Coronins are highly conserved regulators of the actin cytoskeleton whose structure and biological function have remained mysterious until recently. They were originally identified in Dictyostelium, where they localize to actin-rich crown-like structures on the dorsal surface of cells. Coronins bind filamentous actin and the Arp2/3 complex and are involved in modulating actin dynamics. Unlike other known Arp2/3-binding proteins, coronins inhibit Arp2/3 nucleating activity. Genetic data from Dictyostelium, yeast and Drosophila indicate that coronins are important regulators of several actin-dependent physiological processes. Here, we review recent insights into mammalian coronin structure, function and regulation and identify key questions that remain unanswered in this field.     

The regulation of actin polymerization and cross-linking in Dictyostelium

It is clear that the polymerization and organization of actin filament networks plays a critical role in numerous cellular processes. Inhibition of actin polymerization by pharmacological agents will completely prevent chemotactic motility, macropinocytosis, endocytosis, and phagocytosis. Recently there has been great progress in understanding the mechanisms that control the assembly and structure of the actin cytoskeleton. Members of the Rho family of GTPases have been identified as major players in the signal transduction pathway leading from a cell surface signal to actin polymerization. The Arp2/3 complex has been added to the list of means by which new actin filaments can be nucleated. However, it is clear that actin polymerization by Arp2/3 complex is not the whole story. In principle, the final structures formed by actin filaments will depend on factors such as: the length of actin filaments, the degree of branching, how they are cross-linked and the tensions imparted on them. In addition, the means by which actin polymerization generates protrusion of membranes is still controversial. A phagosome, filopodium and a lamellipodium all require polymerization of new actin filaments, but each has a characteristic morphology and cytoskeletal structure. In the following chapter, we will discuss actin polymerization and filament organization, especially as it relates to the machinery of phagocytosis in Dictyostelium.     

The Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome protein directs actin-based motility by stimulating actin nucleation with the Arp2/3 complex.

Actin polymerization at the cell cortex is thought to provide the driving force for aspects of cell-shape change and locomotion. To coordinate cellular movements, the initiation of actin polymerization is tightly regulated, both spatially and temporally. The Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome protein (WASP), encoded by the gene that is mutated in the immunodeficiency disorder Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome [1], has been implicated in the control of actin polymerization in cells [2] [3] [4] [5]. The Arp2/3 complex, an actin-nucleating factor that consists of seven polypeptide subunits [6] [7] [8], was recently shown to physically interact with WASP [9]. We sought to determine whether WASP is a cellular activator of the Arp2/3 complex and found that WASP stimulates the actin nucleation activity of the Arp2/3 complex in vitro. Moreover, WASP-coated microspheres polymerized actin, formed actin tails and exhibited actin-based motility in cell extracts, similar to those behaviors displayed by the pathogenic bacterium Listeria monocytogenes. In extracts depleted of the Arp2/3 complex, WASP-coated microspheres and L. monocytogenes were non-motile and exhibited only residual actin polymerization. These results demonstrate that WASP is sufficient to direct actin-based motility in cell extracts and that this function is mediated by the Arp2/3 complex. WASP interacts with diverse signaling proteins and may therefore function to couple signal transduction pathways to Arp2/3-complex activation and actin polymerization.     

Arp2/3 complex-mediated actin polymerisation occurs on specific pre-existing networks in cells and requires spatial restriction to sustain functional lamellipod extension

The classical Arp2/3-mediated dendritic network defines the cytoskeleton at the leading edge of crawling cells, and it is generally assumed that Arp2/3-mediated actin polymerization generates the force necessary to extend lamellipods. Our previous work suggested that successful lamellipod extension required not only free barbed ends for actin polymerization but also a proper ultrastructural organization of the cytoskeleton. To further explore the structural role of the Arp2/3 complex-mediated networks in lamellipod morphology and function, we performed a detailed analysis of the ultrastructure of the Arp2/3-mediated networks, using the WA domains of Scar and WASp to generate mislocalised Arp2/3 networks in vivo, and to reconstruct de novo Arp2/3-mediated actin nucleation and polymerization on extracted cytoskeletons. We present here evidence that spatially unrestricted Arp2/3-mediated networks are intrinsically three-dimensional and multilayered by nature and, as such, cannot sustain significant polarized extension. Furthermore, such networks polymerize only at preferred locations in extracted cells, corresponding to pre-existing Arp2/3 networks, suggesting that the specific molecular organization of the actin cytoskeleton, in terms of structure and/or biochemical composition, dictates the location of Arp2/3 complex-mediated actin polymerization. We propose that successful lamellipod extension depends not only on localized actin polymerization mediated through local signalling, but also on spatial restriction of the Arp2/3 complex-mediated nucleation of actin polymerization, both in terms of location within the cell and ultrastructural organization of the resulting network.     

Synthetic Triterpenoids Target the Arp2/3 Complex and Inhibit Branched Actin Polymerization

Synthetic triterpenoids are anti-tumor agents that affect numerous cellular functions including apoptosis and growth inhibition. Here, we used mass spectrometric and protein array approaches and uncovered that triterpenoids associate with proteins of the actin cytoskeleton, including actin-related protein 3 (Arp3). Arp3, a subunit of the Arp2/3 complex, is involved in branched actin polymerization and the formation of lamellipodia. 2-cyano-3,12-dioxooleana-1,9-dien-28-oic acid (CDDO)-Im and CDDO-Me were observed to 1) inhibit the localization of Arp3 and actin at the leading edge of cells, 2) abrogate cell polarity, and 3) inhibit Arp2/3-dependent branched actin polymerization. We confirmed our drug effects with siRNA targeting of Arp3 and observed a decrease in Rat2 cell migration. Taken together, our data suggest that synthetic triterpenoids target Arp3 and branched actin polymerization to inhibit cell migration.     

Arabidopsis NAP1 is essential for Arp2/3-dependent trichome morphogenesis

The dynamic nature of the eukaryotic actin cytoskeleton is essential for the locomotion of animal cells and the morphogenesis of plant and fungal cells. The F-actin nucleating/branching activity of the Arp2/3 complex is a key function for all of these processes. The SCAR/WAVE family represents a group of Arp2/3 activators that are associated with lamellipodia formation. A protein complex of PIR121, NAP1, ABI, and HSPC300 is required for SCAR regulation by cell signaling pathways, but the exact nature of this interaction is controversial and represents a continually evolving model. The mechanism originally proposed was of a SCAR trans repressing complex supported by evidence from in vitro experiments. This model was reinforced by genetic studies in the Drosophila central nervous system and Dictyostelium, where the knockout of certain SCAR-complex components leads to excessive SCAR-mediated actin polymerization. Conflicting data have steadily accumulated from animal tissue culture experiments suggesting that the complex activates rather than represses in vivo SCAR activity. Recent biochemical evidence supports the SCAR-complex activator model. Here, we show that genetic observations in Arabidopsis are compatible with an activation model and provide one potential mechanism for the regulation of the newly identified Arabidopsis Arp2/3 complex.     

A novel role for 14-kDa phosphohistidine phosphatase in lamellipodia formation

Cell migration involves dynamic regulation of the actin cytoskeleton, which exhibits rapid actin polymerization at the leading edge of migrating cells. This process relies on regulated recruitment of actin nucleators and actin-binding proteins to the leading edge to polymerize new actin filaments. Many of these proteins have been identified, including the actin-related protein (Arp) 2/3 complex, which has emerged as the core player in the initiation of actin polymerization. However, the functional coordination of these proteins is unclear. Previously, we have demonstrated that the 14-kDa phosphohistidine phosphatase (PHP14) is involved in cell migration regulation and affects actin cytoskeleton reorganization. Here, we show that PHP14 may regulate actin remodeling directly and play an important role in dynamic regulation of the actin cytoskeleton. We observed a colocalization of PHP14 with Arp3 and F-actin at the leading edge of migrating cells. Moreover, PHP14 was recruited to the actin remodeling sites in parallel with Arp3 during lamellipodia formation. Furthermore, PHP14 knockdown impaired Arp3 localization at the leading edge of lamellipodia, as well as lamellipodia formation. Most importantly, we found that PHP14 was a novel F-actin-binding protein, displaying an Arp2/3-dependent localization to the leading edge. Collectively, our results indicated a crucial role for PHP14 in the dynamic regulation of the actin cytoskeleton and cell migration.     

The role of viral protein Ac34 in nuclear relocation of subunits of the actin-related protein 2/3 complex

The actin nucleator actin-related protein complex(Arp2/3) is composed of seven subunits: Arp2,Arp3, p40/ARPC1(P40), p34/ARPC2(P34), p21/ARPC3(P21), p20/ARPC4(P20), and p16/ARPC5(P16). Arp2/3 plays crucial roles in a variety of cellular activities through regulation of actin polymerization. Autographa californica multiple nucleopolyhedrovirus(Ac MNPV), one of the beststudied alphabaculoviruses, induces Arp2/3 nuclear relocation and mediates nuclear actin polymerization to assist in virus replication. We have demonstrated that Ac34, a viral late-gene product, induces translocation of the P40 subunit of Arp2/3 to the nucleus during Ac MNPV infection. However, it remains unknown whether Ac34 could relocate other Arp2/3 subunits to the nucleus. In this study, the effects of the viral protein Ac34 on the distribution of these subunits were studied by an immunofluorescence assay. Arp2, P34, P21, and P20 cloned from Spodoptera frugiperda(Sf9) cells showed mainly cytoplasmic localization and were relocated to the nucleus in the presence of Ac34. In addition, Arp3 was localized in the cytoplasm in both the presence and absence of Ac34, and P16 showed whole-cell localization. In contrast to Sf9 cells, all subunits of mammalian Arp2/3 showed no nuclear relocation in the presence of Ac34. Co-immunoprecipitation analysis of the interaction between Ac34 and Arp2/3 subunits revealed that Ac34 bound to P40,P34, and P20 of Sf9 cells. However, none of the subunits of mammalian Arp2/3 interacted with Ac34, indicating that protein-protein interaction is essential for Ac34 to relocate Arp2/3 subunits to the nucleus.