Comparative anatomy of embryogenesis in three species of Podostemaceae and evolution of the loss of embryonic shoot and root meristems

During embryogenesis in angiosperms, the embryonic shoot and root meristems are created at opposite poles of the embryo, establishing a vertical body plan. However, the aquatic eudicot family Podostemaceae exhibits an unusual horizontal body plan, which is attributed to the loss of embryonic shoot and root meristems. To infer the embryogenetic changes responsible for the loss of these meristems, we examined the embryogenesis of three podostemads with different meristem characters, that is, Terniopsis brevis with distinct shoot and root meristems, Zeylanidium lichenoides with reduced shoot and no root meristems, and Hydrobryum japonicum with no shoot and no root meristems. In T. brevis, as in other eudicots, the putative organizing center (OC) and L1 layer (=the epidermal cell layer) arose to generate a distinct shoot meristem initial, and the hypophysis formed the putative quiescent center (QC) of a root meristem. Z. lichenoides had a morphologically unrecognizable shoot meristem, because a distinct L1 layer did not develop, whereas the putative OC precursor arose normally. In H. japonicum, the vertical divisions of the apical cells of eight-cell embryo prevented putative OC initiation. In Z. lichenoides and H. japonicum, the putative QC failed to initiate because the hypophysis repeated longitudinal divisions during early embryogenesis. Based on their phylogenetic relationships, we infer that the conventional embryonic shoot meristem was lost in Podostemaceae via two steps, that is, the loss of a distinct L1 layer and the loss of the OC, whereas the loss of the embryonic root meristem occurred once by misspecification of the hypophysis.     

The indeterminate floral apex1 gene regulates meristem determinacy and identity in the maize inflorescence

Meristems may be determinate or indeterminate. In maize, the indeterminate inflorescence meristem produces three types of determinate meristems: spikelet pair, spikelet and floral meristems. These meristems are defined by their position and their products. We have discovered a gene in maize, indeterminate floral apex1 (ifa1) that regulates meristem determinacy. The defect found in ifa1 mutants is specific to meristems and does not affect lateral organs. In ifa1 mutants, the determinate meristems become less determinate. The spikelet pair meristem initiates more than a pair of spikelets and the spikelet meristem initiates more than the normal two flowers. The floral meristem initiates all organs correctly, but the ovule primordium, the terminal product of the floral meristem, enlarges and proliferates, expressing both meristem and ovule marker genes. A role for ifa1 in meristem identity in addition to meristem determinacy was revealed by double mutant analysis. In zea agamous1 (zag1) ifa1 double mutants, the female floral meristem converts to a branch meristem whereas the male floral meristem converts to a spikelet meristem. In indeterminate spikelet1 (ids1) ifa1 double mutants, female spikelet meristems convert to branch meristems and male spikelet meristems convert to spikelet pair meristems. The double mutant phenotypes suggest that the specification of meristems in the maize inflorescence involves distinct steps in an integrated process.     

AtDEK1 is essential for specification of embryonic epidermal cell fate

The specification of epidermal (L1) identity occurs early during plant embryogenesis. Here we show that, in Arabidopsis, AtDEK1 encodes a key component of the embryonic L1 cell-layer specification pathway. Loss of AtDEK1 function leads to early embryo lethality characterized by a severe loss of cell organization in the embryo proper and abnormal cell divisions within the suspensor. Markers for L1 identity, ACR4 and ATML1, are not expressed in homozygous mutant embryos. In order to clarify the function of AtDEK1 further, an RNAi knockdown approach was used. This allowed embryos to partially complete embryogenesis before losing AtDEK1 activity. Resulting seedlings showed a specific loss of epidermal cell identity within large portions of the cotyledons. In addition, meristem structure and function was systematically either reduced or entirely lost. AtDEK1 expression is not restricted to the L1 epidermal cell layer at any stage in development. This is consistent with AtDEK1 playing an upstream role in the continuous generation or interpretation of positional information required for epidermal specification. Our results not only identify a specific role for AtDEK1 during embryogenesis, but underline the potential key importance of L1 specification at the globular stage for subsequent progression through embryogenesis.     

The expression of D-cyclin genes defines distinct developmental zones in snapdragon apical meristems and is locally regulated by the Cycloidea gene

Three D-cyclin genes are expressed in the apical meristems of snapdragon (Antirrhinum majus). The cyclin D1 and D3b genes are expressed throughout meristems, whereas cyclin D3a is restricted to the peripheral region of the meristem, especially the organ primordia. During floral development, cyclin D3b expression is: (a) locally modulated in the cells immediately surrounding the base of organ primordia, defining a zone between lateral organs that may act as a developmental boundary; (b) locally modulated in the ventral petals during petal folding; and (c) is specifically repressed in the dorsal stamen by the cycloidea gene. Expression of both cyclin D3 genes is reduced prior to the cessation of cell cycle activity, as judged by histone H4 expression. Expression of all three D-cyclin genes is modulated by factors that regulate plant growth, particularly sucrose and cytokinin. These observations may provide a molecular basis for understanding the local regulation of cell proliferation during plant growth and development.     

Expression of CDC2Zm and KNOTTED1 during in-vitro axillary shoot meristem proliferation and adventitious shoot meristem formation in maize (Zea mays L.) and barley (Hordeum vulgare L.)

Expression of CDC2Zm and KNOTTED1 (KN1) in maize (Zea mays L.) and their cross-reacting proteins in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) was studied using immunolocalization during in-vitro axillary shoot meristem proliferation and adventitious shoot meristem formation. Expression of CDC2Zm, a protein involved in cell division, roughly correlated with in-vitro cell proliferation and in the meristematic domes CDC2Zm expression was triggered during in-vitro proliferation. Analysis of the expression of KN1, a protein necessary for maintenance of the shoot meristem, showed that KN1 or KN1-homologue(s) expression was retained in meristematic cells during in-vitro proliferation of axillary shoot meristems. Multiple adventitious shoot meristems appeared to form directly from the KN1- or KN1 homologue(s)-expressing meristematic cells in the in-vitro proliferating meristematic domes. However, unlike Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) and tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) leaves ectopically expressing KN1 (G. Chuck et al., 1996 Plant Cell 8: 1277–1289; N. Sinha et al., 1993 Genes Dev. 7: 787–797), transgenic maize leaves over-expressing KN1 were unable to initiate adventitious shoot meristems on their surfaces either in planta or in vitro. Therefore, expression of KN1 is not the sole triggering factor responsible for inducing adventitious shoot meristem formation from in-vitro proliferating axillary shoot meristems in maize. Our results show that genes critical to cell division and plant development have utility in defining in-vitro plant morphogenesis at the molecular level and, in combination with transformation technologies, will be powerful tools in identifying the fundamental molecular and-or genetic triggering factor(s) responsible for reprogramming of plant cells during plant morphogenesis in-vitro. Received: 2 June 1997 / Accepted: 21 July 1997     

Sequential gene activation and gene imprinting during early embryo development in maize

Gene imprinting is a widely observed epigenetic phenomenon in maize endosperm; however, whether it also occurs in the maize embryo remains controversial. Here, we used high‐throughput RNA sequencing on laser capture microdissected and manually dissected maize embryos from reciprocal crosses between inbred lines B73 and Mo17 at six time points (3–13 days after pollination, DAP) to analyze allelic gene expression patterns. Co‐expression analysis revealed sequential gene activation during maize embryo development. Gene imprinting was observed in maize embryos, and a greater number of imprinted genes were identified at early embryo stages. Sixty‐four strongly imprinted genes were identified (at the threshold of 9:1) on manually dissected embryos 5–13 DAP (more imprinted genes at 5 DAP). Forty‐one strongly imprinted genes were identified from laser capture microdissected embryos at 3 and 5 DAP (more imprinted genes at 3 DAP). Furthermore, of the 56 genes that were completely imprinted (at the threshold of 99:1), 36 were not previously identified as imprinted genes in endosperm or embryos. In situ hybridization demonstrated that most of the imprinted genes were expressed abundantly in maize embryonic tissue. Our results shed lights on early maize embryo development and provide evidence to support that gene imprinting occurs in maize embryos.     

Specification of Arabidopsis floral meristem identity by repression of flowering time genes

Flowering plants produce floral meristems in response to intrinsic and extrinsic flowering inductive signals. In Arabidopsis, the floral meristem identity genes LEAFY (LFY) and APETALA1 (AP1) are activated to play a pivotal role in specifying floral meristems during floral transition. We show here that the emerging floral meristems require AP1 to partly specify their floral identities by directly repressing a group of flowering time genes, including SHORT VEGETATIVE PHASE (SVP), AGAMOUS-LIKE 24 (AGL24) and SUPPRESSOR OF OVEREXPRESSION OF CO1 (SOC1). In wild-type plants, these flowering time genes are normally downregulated in emerging floral meristems. In the absence of AP1, these genes are ectopically expressed, transforming floral meristems into shoot meristems. By post-translational activation of an AP1-GR fusion protein and chromatin immunoprecipitation assays, we further demonstrate the repression of these flowering time genes by induced AP1 activity and in vivo AP1 binding to the cis-regulatory regions of these genes. These findings indicate that once AP1 is activated during the floral transition, it acts partly as a master repressor in floral meristems by directly suppressing the expression of flowering time genes, thus preventing the continuation of the shoot developmental program.