Dynamic Exchange of Two Essential DNA Polymerases during Replication and after Fork Arrest

The replisome is a multiprotein machine responsible for the faithful replication of chromosomal and plasmid DNA. Using single-molecule super-resolution imaging, we characterized the dynamics of three replisomal proteins in live Bacillus subtilis cells: the two replicative DNA polymerases, PolC and DnaE, and a processivity clamp loader subunit, DnaX. We quantified the protein mobility and dwell times during normal replication and following replication fork stress using damage-independent and damage-dependent conditions. With these results, we report the dynamic and cooperative process of DNA replication based on changes in the measured diffusion coefficients and dwell times. These experiments show that the replication proteins are all highly dynamic and that the exchange rate depends on whether DNA synthesis is active or arrested. Our results also suggest coupling between PolC and DnaX in the DNA replication process and indicate that DnaX provides an important role in synthesis during repair. Furthermore, our results suggest that DnaE provides a limited contribution to chromosomal replication and repair in vivo.     

Spatial separation between replisome‐ and template‐induced replication stress signaling

Polymerase‐blocking DNA lesions are thought to elicit a checkpoint response via accumulation of single‐stranded DNA at stalled replication forks. However, as an alternative to persistent fork stalling, re‐priming downstream of lesions can give rise to daughter‐strand gaps behind replication forks. We show here that the processing of such structures by an exonuclease, Exo1, is required for timely checkpoint activation, which in turn prevents further gap erosion in S phase. This Rad9‐dependent mechanism of damage signaling is distinct from the Mrc1‐dependent, fork‐associated response to replication stress induced by conditions such as nucleotide depletion or replisome‐inherent problems, but reminiscent of replication‐independent checkpoint activation by single‐stranded DNA. Our results indicate that while replisome stalling triggers a checkpoint response directly at the stalled replication fork, the response to replication stress elicited by polymerase‐blocking lesions mainly emanates from Exo1‐processed, postreplicative daughter‐strand gaps, thus offering a mechanistic explanation for the dichotomy between replisome‐ versus template‐induced checkpoint signaling.     

Bacteriophage SPP1 DNA replication strategies promote viral and disable host replication in vitro

Complex viruses that encode their own initiation proteins and subvert the host’s elongation apparatus have provided valuable insights into DNA replication. Using purified bacteriophage SPP1 and Bacillus subtilis proteins, we have reconstituted a rolling circle replication system that recapitulates genetically defined protein requirements. Eleven proteins are required: phage-encoded helicase (G40P), helicase loader (G39P), origin binding protein (G38P) and G36P single-stranded DNA-binding protein (SSB); and host-encoded PolC and DnaE polymerases, processivity factor (β₂), clamp loader (τ-δ-δ′) and primase (DnaG). This study revealed a new role for the SPP1 origin binding protein. In the presence of SSB, it is required for initiation on replication forks that lack origin sequences, mimicking the activity of the PriA replication restart protein in bacteria. The SPP1 replisome is supported by both host and viral SSBs, but phage SSB is unable to support B. subtilis replication, likely owing to its inability to stimulate the PolC holoenzyme in the B. subtilis context. Moreover, phage SSB inhibits host replication, defining a new mechanism by which bacterial replication could be regulated by a viral factor.     

Replisome-mediated Translesion Synthesis and Leading Strand Template Lesion Skipping Are Competing Bypass Mechanisms

A number of different enzymatic pathways have evolved to ensure that DNA replication can proceed past template base damage. These pathways include lesion skipping by the replisome, replication fork regression followed by either correction of the damage and origin-independent replication restart or homologous recombination-mediated restart of replication downstream of the lesion, and bypass of the damage by a translesion synthesis DNA polymerase. We report here that of two translesion synthesis polymerases tested, only DNA polymerase IV, not DNA polymerase II, could engage productively with the Escherichia coli replisome to bypass leading strand template damage, despite the fact that both enzymes are shown to be interacting with the replicase. Inactivation of the 3′ → 5′ proofreading exonuclease of DNA polymerase II did not enable bypass. Bypass by DNA polymerase IV required its ability to interact with the β clamp and act as a translesion polymerase but did not require its “little finger” domain, a secondary region of interaction with the β clamp. Bypass by DNA polymerase IV came at the expense of the inherent leading strand lesion skipping activity of the replisome, indicating that they are competing reactions.     

Single-molecule studies of DNA replisome function

Fast and accurate replication of DNA is accomplished by the interactions of multiple proteins in the dynamic DNA replisome. The DNA replisome effectively coordinates the leading and lagging strand synthesis of DNA. These complex, yet elegantly organized, molecular machines have been studied extensively by kinetic and structural methods to provide an in-depth understanding of the mechanism of DNA replication. Owing to averaging of observables, unique dynamic information of the biochemical pathways and reactions is concealed in conventional ensemble methods. However, recent advances in the rapidly expanding field of single-molecule analyses to study single biomolecules offer opportunities to probe and understand the dynamic processes involved in large biomolecular complexes such as replisomes. This review will focus on the recent developments in the biochemistry and biophysics of DNA replication employing single-molecule techniques and the insights provided by these methods towards a better understanding of the intricate mechanisms of DNA replication.     

Movement of replicating DNA through a stationary replisome

We found that DNA is replicated at a central stationary polymerase, and each replicated region moves away from the replisome. In Bacillus subtilis, DNA polymerase is predominantly located at or near midcell. When replication was blocked in a specific chromosomal region, that region was centrally located with DNA polymerase. Upon release of the block, each copy of the duplicated region was located toward opposite cell poles, away from the central replisome. In a roughly synchronous population of cells, a region of chromosome between origin and terminus moved to the replisome prior to duplication. Thus, the polymerase at the replication forks is stationary, and the template is pulled in and released outward during duplication. We propose that B. subtilis, and probably many bacteria, harness energy released during nucleotide condensation by a stationary replisome to facilitate chromosome partitioning.     

Replication and recombination of herpes simplex virus DNA

Replication of herpes simplex virus takes place in the cell nucleus and is carried out by a replisome composed of six viral proteins: the UL30-UL42 DNA polymerase, the UL5-UL8-UL52 helicase-primase, and the UL29 single-stranded DNA-binding protein ICP8. The replisome is loaded on origins of replication by the UL9 initiator origin-binding protein. Virus replication is intimately coupled to recombination and repair, often performed by cellular proteins. Here, we review new significant developments: the three-dimensional structures for the DNA polymerase, the polymerase accessory factor, and the single-stranded DNA-binding protein; the reconstitution of a functional replisome in vitro; the elucidation of the mechanism for activation of origins of DNA replication; the identification of cellular proteins actively involved in or responding to viral DNA replication; and the elucidation of requirements for formation of replication foci in the nucleus and effects on protein localization.     

Structure of a human replisome shows the organisation and interactions of a DNA replication machine

The human replisome is an elaborate arrangement of molecular machines responsible for accurate chromosome replication. At its heart is the CDC45‐MCM‐GINS (CMG) helicase, which, in addition to unwinding the parental DNA duplex, arranges many proteins including the leading‐strand polymerase Pol ε, together with TIMELESS‐TIPIN, CLASPIN and AND‐1 that have key and varied roles in maintaining smooth replisome progression. How these proteins are coordinated in the human replisome is poorly understood. We have determined a 3.2 Å cryo‐EM structure of a human replisome comprising CMG, Pol ε, TIMELESS‐TIPIN, CLASPIN and AND‐1 bound to replication fork DNA. The structure permits a detailed understanding of how AND‐1, TIMELESS‐TIPIN and Pol ε engage CMG, reveals how CLASPIN binds to multiple replisome components and identifies the position of the Pol ε catalytic domain. Furthermore, the intricate network of contacts contributed by MCM subunits and TIMELESS‐TIPIN with replication fork DNA suggests a mechanism for strand separation.     

The DNA replication machine of a gram-positive organism

This report outlines the protein requirements and subunit organization of the DNA replication apparatus of Streptococcus pyogenes, a Gram-positive organism. Five proteins coordinate their actions to achieve rapid and processive DNA synthesis. These proteins are: the PolC DNA polymerase, tau, delta, delta', and beta. S. pyogenes dnaX encodes only the full-length tau, unlike the Escherichia coli system in which dnaX encodes two proteins, tau and gamma. The S. pyogenes tau binds PolC, but the interaction is not as firm as the corresponding interaction in E. coli, underlying the inability to purify a PolC holoenzyme from Gram-positive cells. The tau also binds the delta and delta' subunits to form a taudeltadelta' "clamp loader." PolC can assemble with taudeltadelta' to form a PolC.taudeltadelta' complex. After PolC.taudeltadelta' clamps beta to a primed site, it extends DNA 700 nucleotides/second in a highly processive fashion. Gram-positive cells contain a second DNA polymerase, encoded by dnaE, that has homology to the E. coli alpha subunit of E. coli DNA polymerase III. We show here that the S. pyogenes DnaE polymerase also functions with the beta clamp.     

Comprehensive analysis of DNA polymerase III α subunits and their homologs in bacterial genomes

The analysis of ∼2000 bacterial genomes revealed that they all, without a single exception, encode one or more DNA polymerase III α-subunit (PolIIIα) homologs. Classified into C-family of DNA polymerases they come in two major forms, PolC and DnaE, related by ancient duplication. While PolC represents an evolutionary compact group, DnaE can be further subdivided into at least three groups (DnaE1-3). We performed an extensive analysis of various sequence, structure and surface properties of all four polymerase groups. Our analysis suggests a specific evolutionary pathway leading to PolC and DnaE from the last common ancestor and reveals important differences between extant polymerase groups. Among them, DnaE1 and PolC show the highest conservation of the analyzed properties. DnaE3 polymerases apparently represent an ‘impaired’ version of DnaE1. Nonessential DnaE2 polymerases, typical for oxygen-using bacteria with large GC-rich genomes, have a number of features in common with DnaE3 polymerases. The analysis of polymerase distribution in genomes revealed three major combinations: DnaE1 either alone or accompanied by one or more DnaE2s, PolC + DnaE3 and PolC + DnaE1. The first two combinations are present in Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis, respectively. The third one (PolC + DnaE1), found in Clostridia, represents a novel, so far experimentally uncharacterized, set.     

Polymerase γ efficiently replicates through many natural template barriers but stalls at the HSP1 quadruplex

Faithful replication of the mitochondrial genome is carried out by a set of key nuclear-encoded proteins. DNA polymerase γ is a core component of the mtDNA replisome and the only replicative DNA polymerase localized to mitochondria. The asynchronous mechanism of mtDNA replication predicts that the replication machinery encounters dsDNA and unique physical barriers such as structured genes, G-quadruplexes, and other obstacles. In vitro experiments here provide evidence that the polymerase γ heterotrimer is well-adapted to efficiently synthesize DNA, despite the presence of many naturally occurring roadblocks. However, we identified a specific G-quadruplex–forming sequence at the heavy-strand promoter (HSP1) that has the potential to cause significant stalling of mtDNA replication. Furthermore, this structured region of DNA corresponds to the break site for a large (3,895 bp) deletion observed in mitochondrial disease patients. The presence of this deletion in humans correlates with UV exposure, and we have found that efficiency of polymerase γ DNA synthesis is reduced after this quadruplex is exposed to UV in vitro.     

Replisome stability at defective DNA replication forks is independent of S phase checkpoint kinases

The S phase checkpoint pathway preserves genome stability by protecting defective DNA replication forks, but the underlying mechanisms are still understood poorly. Previous work with budding yeast suggested that the checkpoint kinases Mec1 and Rad53 might prevent collapse of the replisome when nucleotide concentrations are limiting, thereby allowing the subsequent resumption of DNA synthesis. Here we describe a direct analysis of replisome stability in budding yeast cells lacking checkpoint kinases, together with a high-resolution view of replisome progression across the genome. Surprisingly, we find that the replisome is stably associated with DNA replication forks following replication stress in the absence of Mec1 or Rad53. A component of the replicative DNA helicase is phosphorylated within the replisome in a Mec1-dependent manner upon replication stress, and our data indicate that checkpoint kinases control replisome function rather than stability, as part of a multifaceted response that allows cells to survive defects in chromosome replication.     

Divalent Cations Alter the Rate-Limiting Step of PrimPol-Catalyzed DNA Elongation

PrimPol is the most recently discovered human DNA polymerase/primase and plays an emerging role in nuclear and mitochondrial genomic maintenance. As a member of archaeo-eukaryotic primase superfamily enzymes, PrimPol possesses DNA polymerase and primase activities that are important for replication fork progression in vitro and in cellulo. The enzymatic activities of PrimPol are critically dependent on the nucleotidyl-transfer reaction to incorporate deoxyribonucleotides successively; however, our knowledge concerning the kinetic mechanism of the reaction remains incomplete. Using enzyme kinetic analyses and computer simulations, we dissected the mechanism by which PrimPol transfers a nucleotide to a primer-template DNA, which comprises DNA binding, conformational transition, nucleotide binding, phosphoester bond formation, and dissociation steps. We obtained the rate constants of the steps by steady-state and pre-steady-state kinetic analyses and simulations. Our data demonstrate that the rate-limiting step of PrimPol-catalyzed DNA elongation depends on the metal cofactor involved. In the presence of Mn²⁺, a conformational transition step from non-productive to productive PrimPol:DNA complexes limits the enzymatic turnover, whereas in the presence of Mg²⁺, the chemical step becomes rate limiting. As evidenced from our kinetic and simulation data, PrimPol maintains the same kinetic mechanism under either millimolar or physiological micromolar Mn²⁺ concentration. Our study revealed the underlying mechanism by which PrimPol catalyzes nucleotide incorporation with two common metal cofactors and provides a kinetic basis for further understanding the regulatory mechanism of this functionally diverse primase-polymerase.     

Two mechanisms coordinate replication termination by the Escherichia coli Tus–Ter complex

The Escherichia coli replication terminator protein (Tus) binds to Ter sequences to block replication forks approaching from one direction. Here, we used single molecule and transient state kinetics to study responses of the heterologous phage T7 replisome to the Tus–Ter complex. The T7 replisome was arrested at the non-permissive end of Tus–Ter in a manner that is explained by a composite mousetrap and dynamic clamp model. An unpaired C(6) that forms a lock by binding into the cytosine binding pocket of Tus was most effective in arresting the replisome and mutation of C(6) removed the barrier. Isolated helicase was also blocked at the non-permissive end, but unexpectedly the isolated polymerase was not, unless C(6) was unpaired. Instead, the polymerase was blocked at the permissive end. This indicates that the Tus–Ter mechanism is sensitive to the translocation polarity of the DNA motor. The polymerase tracking along the template strand traps the C(6) to prevent lock formation; the helicase tracking along the other strand traps the complementary G(6) to aid lock formation. Our results are consistent with the model where strand separation by the helicase unpairs the GC(6) base pair and triggers lock formation immediately before the polymerase can sequester the C(6) base.     

DnaB helicase dynamics in bacterial DNA replication resolved by single-molecule studies

In Escherichia coli, the DnaB helicase forms the basis for the assembly of the DNA replication complex. The stability of DnaB at the replication fork is likely important for successful replication initiation and progression. Single-molecule experiments have significantly changed the classical model of highly stable replication machines by showing that components exchange with free molecules from the environment. However, due to technical limitations, accurate assessments of DnaB stability in the context of replication are lacking. Using in vitro fluorescence single-molecule imaging, we visualise DnaB loaded on forked DNA templates. That these helicases are highly stable at replication forks, indicated by their observed dwell time of ∼30 min. Addition of the remaining replication factors results in a single DnaB helicase integrated as part of an active replisome. In contrast to the dynamic behaviour of other replisome components, DnaB is maintained within the replisome for the entirety of the replication process. Interestingly, we observe a transient interaction of additional helicases with the replication fork. This interaction is dependent on the τ subunit of the clamp-loader complex. Collectively, our single-molecule observations solidify the role of the DnaB helicase as the stable anchor of the replisome, but also reveal its capacity for dynamic interactions.     

Functional interplay of DnaE polymerase,DnaG primase and DnaC helicase within a ternary complex,and primase to polymerase hand-off during lagging strand DNA replication in Bacillus subtilis

Bacillus subtilis has two replicative DNA polymerases. PolC is a processive high-fidelity replicative polymerase, while the error-prone DnaE_Bs extends RNA primers before hand-off to PolC at the lagging strand. We show that DnaE_Bs interacts with the replicative helicase DnaC and primase DnaG in a ternary complex. We characterize their activities and analyse the functional significance of their interactions using primase, helicase and primer extension assays, and a ‘stripped down’ reconstituted coupled assay to investigate the coordinated displacement of the parental duplex DNA at a replication fork, synthesis of RNA primers along the lagging strand and hand-off to DnaE_Bs. The DnaG–DnaE_Bs hand-off takes place after de novo polymerization of only two ribonucleotides by DnaG, and does not require other replication proteins. Furthermore, the fidelity of DnaE_Bs is improved by DnaC and DnaG, likely via allosteric effects induced by direct protein–protein interactions that lower the efficiency of nucleotide mis-incorporations and/or the efficiency of extension of mis-aligned primers in the catalytic site of DnaE_Bs. We conclude that de novo RNA primer synthesis by DnaG and initial primer extension by DnaE_Bs are carried out by a lagging strand–specific subcomplex comprising DnaG, DnaE_Bs and DnaC, which stimulates chromosomal replication with enhanced fidelity.     

Cross-utilization of the beta sliding clamp by replicative polymerases of evolutionary divergent organisms

Chromosomal replicases are multiprotein machines comprised of a DNA polymerase, a sliding clamp, and a clamp loader. This study examines replicase components for their ability to be switched between Gram-positive and Gram-negative organisms. These two cell types diverged over 1 billion years ago, and their sequences have diverged widely. Yet the Escherichia coli beta clamp binds directly to Staphylococcus aureus PolC and makes it highly processive, confirming and extending earlier results (Low, R. L., Rashbaum, S. A. , and Cozzarelli, N. R. (1976) J. Biol. Chem. 251, 1311-1325). We have also examined the S. aureus beta clamp. The results show that it functions with S. aureus PolC, but not with E. coli polymerase III core. PolC is a rather potent polymerase by itself and can extend a primer with an intrinsic speed of 80-120 nucleotides per s. Both E. coli beta and S. aureus beta converted PolC to a highly processive polymerase, but surprisingly, beta also increased the intrinsic rate of DNA synthesis to 240-580 nucleotides per s. This finding expands the scope of beta function beyond a simple mechanical tether for processivity to include that of an effector that increases the intrinsic rate of nucleotide incorporation by the polymerase.     

RecO and RecR Are Necessary for RecA Loading in Response to DNA Damage and Replication Fork Stress

RecA is central to maintaining genome integrity in bacterial cells. Despite the near-ubiquitous conservation of RecA in eubacteria, the pathways that facilitate RecA loading and repair center assembly have remained poorly understood in Bacillus subtilis. Here, we show that RecA rapidly colocalizes with the DNA polymerase complex (replisome) immediately following DNA damage or damage-independent replication fork arrest. In Escherichia coli, the RecFOR and RecBCD pathways serve to load RecA and the choice between these two pathways depends on the type of damage under repair. We found in B. subtilis that the rapid localization of RecA to repair centers is strictly dependent on RecO and RecR in response to all types of damage examined, including a site-specific double-stranded break and damage-independent replication fork arrest. Furthermore, we provide evidence that, although RecF is not required for RecA repair center formation in vivo, RecF does increase the efficiency of repair center assembly, suggesting that RecF may influence the initial stages of RecA nucleation or filament extension. We further identify single-stranded DNA binding protein (SSB) as an additional component important for RecA repair center assembly. Truncation of the SSB C terminus impairs the ability of B. subtilis to form repair centers in response to damage and damage-independent fork arrest. With these results, we conclude that the SSB-dependent recruitment of RecOR to the replisome is necessary for loading and organizing RecA into repair centers in response to DNA damage and replication fork arrest.     

Termination of DNA replication at Tus-ter barriers results in under-replication of template DNA

The complete and accurate duplication of genomic information is vital to maintain genome stability in all domains of life. In Escherichia coli, replication termination, the final stage of the duplication process, is confined to the “replication fork trap” region by multiple unidirectional fork barriers formed by the binding of Tus protein to genomic ter sites. Termination typically occurs away from Tus-ter complexes, but they become part of the fork fusion process when a delay to one replisome allows the second replisome to travel more than halfway around the chromosome. In this instance, replisome progression is blocked at the nonpermissive interface of the Tus-ter complex, termination then occurs when a converging replisome meets the permissive interface. To investigate the consequences of replication fork fusion at Tus-ter complexes, we established a plasmid-based replication system where we could mimic the termination process at Tus-ter complexes in vitro. We developed a termination mapping assay to measure leading strand replication fork progression and demonstrate that the DNA template is under-replicated by 15 to 24 bases when replication forks fuse at Tus-ter complexes. This gap could not be closed by the addition of lagging strand processing enzymes or by the inclusion of several helicases that promote DNA replication. Our results indicate that accurate fork fusion at Tus-ter barriers requires further enzymatic processing, highlighting large gaps that still exist in our understanding of the final stages of chromosome duplication and the evolutionary advantage of having a replication fork trap.     

Mechanistic insights into the enzymatic activity and inhibition of the replicative polymerase exonuclease domain from Mycobacterium tuberculosis

DNA replication fidelity maintains low mutation rates in bacteria. The ε-subunit of a replisome generally acts as the main proofreader during replication, using its 3′–5′ exonuclease activity to excise misincorporated bases thereby maintaining faithful replication. In Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb), however, the polymerase and histidinol phosphatase (PHP) domain of the DNA polymerase DnaE1 is the primary proofreader. This domain thus maintains low mutation rates during replication and is an attractive target for drug development. Even though the structures of DnaE polymerases are available from various organisms, including Mtb, the mechanism of exonuclease activity remains elusive. In this study, we sought to unravel the mechanism and also to identify scaffolds that can specifically inhibit the exonuclease activity. To gain insight into the mode of action, we also characterized the PHP domain of the Mtb error-prone polymerase DnaE2 which shares a nearly identical active site with DnaE1-PHP. Kinetic and mutational studies allowed us to identify the critical residue involved in catalysis. Combined inhibition and computational studies also revealed a specific mode of inhibition of DnaE1-PHP by nucleoside diphosphates. Thus, this study lays the foundation for the rational design of novel inhibitors which target the Mtb replicative proofreader.