水分胁迫下内生真菌球毛壳ND35对冬小麦苗期生长和抗旱性的影响

为明确不同水分条件下内生真菌对冬小麦苗期生长和抗旱性的影响,以抗旱型小麦品种山农16和水分敏感型小麦品种山农22为材料,利用荧光定量PCR技术检测小麦干旱诱导基因脱水素wzy2的表达量来了解冬小麦在干旱胁迫下相关基因的表达差异,通过测定相关生理指标与酶活性来判断小麦发育及其在干旱胁迫下的生理响应状况。结果表明,与正常水分ND35组相比,接种球毛壳菌(Chaetomium globosum)ND35的干旱处理组小麦的根冠比、总蛋白含量、脯氨酸含量及丙二醛含量等指标显著提高,小麦叶片含水量和可溶性糖含量有所降低。在干旱处理组中,球毛壳菌ND35可以显著提高小麦山农16的根长和山农22的株高,接种球毛壳ND35的山农16脯氨酸含量、可溶性糖含量、过氧化氢酶活性比对照组均显著提高,丙二醛含量比对照组降低9.0%,但差异不显著;山农22脯氨酸含量和过氧化氢酶活性比对照组显著提高,丙二醛含量和可溶性糖含量比对照组有所降低,但可溶性糖含量差异不显著;相对定量检测数据显示,接种球毛壳ND35后,两种小麦脱水素wzy2基因的表达量较对照组均能够显著提高。综合分析说明内生真菌球毛壳ND35可以促进冬小麦苗期根系和植株发育,小麦提前进入三叶期,增强小麦避旱性,同时提高小麦根系活力,增强小麦耐旱性;提高个体细胞内水分、糖分、脯氨酸含量,降低丙二醛的氧化性损伤,增强过氧化氢酶活性,从而提高两种冬小麦对干旱胁迫的耐受能力;球毛壳ND35促进小麦干旱诱导相关基因wzy2的表达量,进而提高抗旱相关蛋白的表达,从而提高两种冬小麦耐脱水性和对干旱胁迫的适应性。     

不同抗旱性冬小麦幼苗根系对水分胁迫的反应

抗旱性不同的小麦根系含水量、水势、渗透势均随水分胁迫强度增加而逐渐下降。其中以水势变化最为灵敏。恢复正常供水72h后,三项指标均有不同程度的回升,抗旱品种恢复能力强。根系渗透调节能力随胁迫强度的加剧而提高,抗旱品种渗透调节的效果好于敏感品种。随着胁迫强度的增加,根中ATP相对含量减少,恢复正常供水72h后,含量可部分恢复,恢复能力与品种的抗旱性一致。     

外源精胺对水分胁迫下小麦幼苗保护酶活性的影响

通过营养液培养试验,研究了水分胁迫下外源精胺(Spm)对抗旱性不同的小麦品种幼苗叶片质膜相对透性及保护酶活性的影响.结果表明:水分胁迫下,小麦叶片的质膜相对透性、M DA含量增加、SOD、CAT和POD活性上升,外源精胺处理可延缓水分胁迫下小麦叶片质膜相对透性和M DA含量上升,提高了SOD、CAT、POD酶活性的上升幅度;并且对抗旱性弱的品种保护酶活性增幅高于抗旱性强的品种.因此,外源精胺处理对抗旱性弱的品种缓解水分胁迫作用大于抗旱性强的品种.     

持续水分胁迫对大豆鼓粒期抗旱性及籽粒品质的影响

用抗旱性不同的品种及新选育品系进行了离体叶片失水率与抗旱性有关的水分生理指标研究及籽粒品质分析。结果表明：(1)抗旱品种的叶片失水率低,保水力强,束缚水含量高,束缚水／自由水比值也高;(2)在失水率与抗旱性的研究中,发现第6h是失水率转折的关键时间,6h以前抗旱类型的失水率低于敏感类型,以后抗旱类型高于敏感类型,而且在不同抗旱类型或同一类型的不同生育时期所测结果均符合这个规律;(3)严重水分胁迫下,蛋白质含量下降,脂肪含量增加,但抗旱类型蛋白质含量高且下降得少,蛋白质含量与抗旱性有一定相关性。因此,在选育抗旱品种时,应选择在干旱条件下失水率低、抗旱性强、蛋白质含量高、蛋白质含量下降少的材料。     

干旱胁迫下小麦叶片的电阻抗图谱参数与生理参数的关系

通过盆栽实验,在适宜水分、中度干旱和严重干旱水分条件下,分别测定了3个不同抗旱类型的7个小麦品种叶片的电阻和电抗以及保护酶活性、MDA含量、细胞膜相对透性、脯氨酸和含水量等生理参数,并拟合了胞外电阻、胞内电阻、驰豫时间以及驰豫时间的分布系数等电阻抗图谱参数,分析了叶片的电阻抗图谱参数与生理参数之间的相关性。结果表明,在受到水分胁迫后,小麦叶片的CAT、POD活性较适宜水分条件下降低,MDA含量、细胞膜相对透性和脯氨酸含量增加,含水量减小;胞外电阻、胞内电阻、驰豫时间以及驰豫时间的分布系数在品种间差异均极显著(P<0.01),而仅胞内电阻在水分处理间差异显著(P<0.05);在适宜水分条件下,胞外电阻与细胞膜透性有显著负相关,驰豫时间与丙二醛、含水量之间有显著正相关,而在严重干旱条件下,驰豫时间分布系数与丙二醛含量之间有显著正相关,胞内电阻与含水量之间有显著负相关。可见,胞内电阻和驰豫时间分布系数在一定程度上反映了小麦叶片受水分胁迫的程度。     

堇菜叶片草酸钙晶体与水分维持的关系

随着全球气候变化加重,干旱强度和持续时间逐渐增加,严重影响植物生长和作物产量。喀斯特为典型的干旱和高钙生境,植物叶片富集大量的草酸钙晶体,而该晶体与植物耐旱性之间的关系并不清楚。该研究以喀斯特适生植物堇菜(Viola verecumda)为材料,土壤进行自然干旱,分析堇菜叶片的草酸钙晶体变化特征与水分之间的关系。结果表明:在土壤自然干旱条件下,堇菜主要通过细胞内束缚水的释放,维持细胞内水分平衡;而在干旱后期,叶片通过关闭气孔,将部分自由水转变为束缚水,防止水分流失。此外,草酸钙晶体的密度与束缚水含量具有极其显著的强正相关线性回归关系(r=0.825 3,P0.000 1),表明草酸钙晶体作为主要的束缚水物质。因此,堇菜植物在耐旱过程中可能协调草酸钙晶体和气孔的生理行为忍耐干旱胁迫。     

干旱胁迫对小麦幼苗根系生长和叶片光合作用的影响

采用水培试验方法,以2个耐旱性不同的小麦品种(敏感型望水白和耐旱型洛旱7号)为材料,研究了干旱胁迫对小麦幼苗根系形态、生理特性以及叶片光合作用的影响,以期揭示小麦幼苗对干旱胁迫的适应机制.结果表明： 干旱胁迫下,2个小麦品种幼苗的根系活力显著增大,而根数和根系表面积受到抑制;干旱胁迫降低了望水白的叶片相对含水量,提高了束缚水/自由水,而对洛旱7号无显著影响;干旱胁迫降低了2个小麦品种叶片的叶绿素含量、净光合速率、蒸腾速率、气孔导度和胞间CO2浓度,但随胁迫时间的延长,洛旱7号的叶绿素含量和净光合速率与对照差异不显著;干旱胁迫降低了2个小麦品种幼苗的单株叶面积,以及望水白的根系、地上部和植株生物量,而对洛旱7号无显著影响.水分胁迫下,耐旱型品种可以通过提高根系活力、保持较高的根系生长量来补偿根系吸收面积的下降,保持较高的根系吸水能力,进而维持较高的光合面积和光合速率,缓解干旱对生长的抑制.     

干旱胁迫对小麦幼苗根系生长和叶片光合作用的影响

采用水培试验方法,以2个耐旱性不同的小麦品种(敏感型望水白和耐旱型洛旱7号)为材料,研究了干旱胁迫对小麦幼苗根系形态、生理特性以及叶片光合作用的影响,以期揭示小麦幼苗对干旱胁迫的适应机制.结果表明： 干旱胁迫下,2个小麦品种幼苗的根系活力显著增大,而根数和根系表面积受到抑制;干旱胁迫降低了望水白的叶片相对含水量,提高了束缚水/自由水,而对洛旱7号无显著影响;干旱胁迫降低了2个小麦品种叶片的叶绿素含量、净光合速率、蒸腾速率、气孔导度和胞间CO2浓度,但随胁迫时间的延长,洛旱7号的叶绿素含量和净光合速率与对照差异不显著;干旱胁迫降低了2个小麦品种幼苗的单株叶面积,以及望水白的根系、地上部和植株生物量,而对洛旱7号无显著影响.水分胁迫下,耐旱型品种可以通过提高根系活力、保持较高的根系生长量来补偿根系吸收面积的下降,保持较高的根系吸水能力,进而维持较高的光合面积和光合速率,缓解干旱对生长的抑制.     

苗期玉米叶片光合特性对水分胁迫的响应

以2个抗旱性不同的玉米品种为材料进行盆栽试验,在苗期设置4个水分梯度,研究气体交换和叶绿素荧光参数及光响应特征。结果表明:随水分胁迫的加剧,除细胞间CO2浓度(Ci)和非光化学淬灭(qN)上升外,其它参数均下降,先玉335(XY335)各参数的变化幅度小于陕单902(SD902);轻度胁迫下品种间气体交换参数差异最大,严重干旱下叶绿素荧光参数差异最大;净光合速率(Pn)和相对电子传递速率(rETR)的光响应曲线拟合结果显示,水分胁迫导致玉米叶片最大光合速率和光能利用率下降,XY335各参数的下降幅度小于SD902;轻度干旱下Pn光响应拟合参数品种间差异最大,严重干旱下rETR光响应拟合参数差异最大。综上表明,水分胁迫导致玉米叶片对强光的敏感性增加,干旱和光抑制对光系统Ⅱ造成的叠加伤害随干旱加重和品种抗旱性弱而加剧,是制约光合作用的主要原因;旱区强光下的玉米幼苗应及时补水,以避免严重干旱和高光强的叠加伤害。     

油菜幼苗光合及叶绿素荧光参数对干旱胁迫的响应及其抗旱性分析

该研究在人工控制水分条件下，设置3个干旱胁迫处理，选用3个主栽油菜品种‘陇油10号’、‘陇油2号’、‘青杂5号’幼苗进行盆栽试验，测定干旱胁迫条件下叶片相对含水量、叶绿素含量、光合气体交换参数及叶绿素荧光参数等指标，考察各指标在干旱胁迫过程中的变化特征，并通过主成分分析(PCA)和隶属函数法评价品种的抗旱性及其主要响应因子，以揭示西北地区油菜幼苗响应干旱胁迫的光合调控机制。结果表明：(1)各品种油菜幼苗的叶片相对含水量(RWC)均随干旱胁迫程度的递增而逐渐降低，最大水分亏缺(WSD)却逐渐上升。(2)各品种油菜幼苗叶片的叶绿素a含量、叶绿素总含量随着干旱胁迫程度的递增而先增加后递减，且同一种幼苗在不同处理间差异显著。(3)各品种油菜幼苗叶片的净光合速率(P_n)、水分利用效率(WUE)、单株生物量、气孔导度(G_s)、胞间CO₂浓度(C_i)均在受到干旱胁迫时迅速降低，且同一品种幼苗在不同处理间差异显著，而其叶片蒸腾速率(T_r)在干旱胁迫下无显著变化。(4)各品种油菜幼苗叶片光化学猝...     

节水应优先于调水

就规划中的南水北调西线工程受水区情况,本刊记者访问了刘昌明院士和陶传进博士。尽管他们对南水北调西线工程的必要性看法不同,却表达了一个共同的声音：受水区应把挖掘自身的节水潜力摆在优先。     

Water,Water, Everywhere

Abstract

Math and Science Across Culture: Activities and Investigations from the Exploratorium. Maurice Bazin, Modesto, and the Exploratorium Teacher Institute. New York: The New Press, 2002. 176 pp. $19.95 (paperback). ISBN 1-56584-541-2

History Beneath the Sea—Nautical Archaeology in the Classroom. K. C. Smith and Amy Douglass (Editors). Washington, D.C.: Society for American Archaeology, 2001. 28 pp. $5.95 (paperback). ISBN 0-932839-17-7.     

Water

Water remains a scarce and valuable resource. Improving technologies for water purification, use and recycling should be a high priority for all branches of science.One of our most crucial and finite resources is freshwater. How often do biologists spare a thought for this substance, other than to think about its purity for the sake of an experiment? How often do we consider that 30 litres of cooling water are used to make one litre of double-distilled water? Americans use approximately 100 gallons per person per day, whereas millions of the world''s poor subsist on less than 5 gallons per day. Within the next 15 years, it is estimated that more than 1.8 billion people will be living in regions with severe water scarcity, partly as a result of climate change. By 2030 it is estimated that the annual global demand for water will increase from 4,500 billion m³ to 6,900 billion m³—approximately 40% more than the amount of freshwater available (Water Resources Group, 2009). We are not only facing an increasing scarcity of water, but we also misuse the available water. Approximately 2.5 billion people use rivers to dispose of waste—not to mention what industry dumps into them—while freshwater dams generate problems of their own including population displacement, the spread of new and more diseases to people living in the vicinity of the river, as well as effects on ecology and farming downstream.Many factors influence the supply of and demand for water, and a one-fits-all solution for all regions is therefore not possible. There are essentially two strategies to ensure a sound supply of freshwater: we either use less water, or we make more of the water that we do use. The first is a typical accounting approach and is limited in scope, whereas the second calls for better science and engineering approaches.Although the surface of the Earth is mostly covered with water, more than 95% of it is salty or inaccessible. One clear solution to increase fresh water supply is desalination, which can be done by distillation or osmosis, through the use of carbon nanotubes, or by using another promising new technology: biomimetics. Water can be filtered through aquaporins—proteins that transport water molecules in and out of cells. Such biotechnologies could reach the market as early as 2013, although other exciting technologies are already available. Simple chemistry can be used, for example, in the ‘PUR'' water purifier that uses gravity to precipitate water-born contaminants and pathogens or the water purifier akin to a trash bag, which cleanses water through a nanofibre filter containing microbicides and carbon to remove pollutants and pathogens. Such simple and cheap technology is ideal for billions of the world''s poor who do not have access to clean drinking water.Of the available freshwater, agriculture uses the largest share—up to 70% in many regions—and technological and biotechnological solutions can also contribute to preserving water in this context. New farming processes that can retain water in the soil, recycle it or reduce its use include no-till farming, crop intensification, improved fertilizer usage, crop development, waste water re-use and pre- and post-harvest food processing, among many others. The different degrees of water quality can also be exploited for agriculture; ‘grey water''—which is unsafe for human consumption—could still be used in agriculture.In addition to improving management practices, there is no question that we need considerably more innovation in water technology to close the supply–demand gap. These developments should include better processes for purification and desalination, more efficient industrial use and re-use and improved agricultural usage. The problem is that the water sector is poorly funded in all respects, including research. New technologies could help to re-use water and reclaim resources from wastewater while generating biogas from the waste. There is also enormous potential for the use of water beyond its consumption in households, agriculture and industry. ‘Blue energy'', for instance, generates power from reverse electrodialysis by mixing saltwater and freshwater across an ion exchange membrane stack. This could potentially generate energy wherever rivers flow into the sea.With so many innovations already under way with so little funding, what other technologies can we come up with to reduce water usage and deal with medical, industrial and individual waste? The issue of waste is a serious and pressing problem: we find pharmaceutical chemicals in fish, which are in turn consumed by humans and other species in the food chain. We need to find ways to effectively transform waste into biodegradable products that can be used as fertilizers, as well as to recover valuable molecules such as rare metals. The downstream consequences of such technologies will be the regeneration of coastal estuaries, lower levels of contaminants in marine life and cleaner rivers. Ultimately, we need much more research into reducing water use, purification, bioremediation and recycling. I submit that this should be a priority research area for all the natural sciences and engineering.Companies are held accountable these days for socially responsible projects, sustainability and their carbon footprint—this includes water usage. Why should research institutions not be held responsible too? After all, we claim to be at the cutting edge of science and should set the trend. Research grants should have a ‘green component'' and a score should be given to applications according to water usage and ‘green work''.     

Matric Bound Water of Water Tissue from Succulents

Matric bound water was measured as water retained by frozen and thawed tissue after desorption on a pressure membrane filter under 20 bars nitrogen gas pressure. Central water-storage tissue and peripheral chlorenchyma from leaves or stems of 15 taxonomically diverse non-halophytic succulent species were investigated. Matric bound water as a per cent of the dry weight averaged higher in water storage than in chlorenchyma tissue but lower than values reported for many mesophytic leaves. Matric bound water as a proportion of the total water held, however, was lower in water tissues. Osmotic potentials were generally high (solute contents low). It is concluded that matric or osmotic forces cannot account, in any unique way, for the high water content of water tissues. This appears to depend, instead, on the enormous ability of the thin-walled cells to take up available water and expand.     

Water Biophysics: How Water Interacts with Biomolecules

The papers of this special issue are based on a Conference on Water Biophysics and develop a fundamental understanding on how water interacts with biomolecules. The Conference highlighted the great empathy of a multidisciplinary and integrated approach to rationalize the role of water in foods, pharmaceutical, and biochemical systems, taking vantage of the advances in simulation and experimental methods.