Temporal Assessment of the Impact of Exposure to Cow Feces in Two Watersheds by Multiple Host-Specific PCR Assays

Exposure to feces in two watersheds with different management histories was assessed by tracking cattle feces bacterial populations using multiple host-specific PCR assays. In addition, environmental factors affecting the occurrence of these markers were identified. Each assay was performed using DNA extracts from water and sediment samples collected from a watershed directly impacted by cattle fecal pollution (WS1) and from a watershed impacted only through runoff (WS2). In WS1, the ruminant-specific Bacteroidales 16S rRNA gene marker CF128F was detected in 65% of the water samples, while the non-16S rRNA gene markers Bac1, Bac2, and Bac5 were found in 32 to 37% of the water samples. In contrast, all source-specific markers were detected in less than 6% of the water samples from WS2. Binary logistic regressions (BLRs) revealed that the occurrence of Bac32F and CF128F was significantly correlated with season as a temporal factor and watershed as a site factor. BLRs also indicated that the dynamics of fecal-source-tracking markers correlated with the density of a traditional fecal indicator (P < 0.001). Overall, our results suggest that a combination of 16S rRNA gene and non-16S rRNA gene markers provides a higher level of confidence for tracking unknown sources of fecal pollution in environmental samples. This study also provided practical insights for implementation of microbial source-tracking practices to determine sources of fecal pollution and the influence of environmental variables on the occurrence of source-specific markers.     

Improving the performance of an end-point PCR assay commonly used for the detection of Bacteroidales pertaining to cow feces

Bacteroidales are normal gut flora of warm-blooded animals. Since each host species carries a different diversity of Bacteroidales, the detection of host-associated gene markers of Bacteroidales has emerged as a promising tool for the tracking of the source of fecal pollution in aquatic ecosystems. To detect cow-associated Bacteroidales, a commonly used method has been an end-point PCR assay with the 16S rRNA genes primers CF128F (cow-associated) and Bac708R (all Bacteroidales). The PCR assay has demonstrated high rates of true-positive detection (i.e., high sensitivity) in all previous studies. However, the assay also had high rates of false-positive detection to the samples of non-target hosts in some cases (i.e., low specificity). In opposite to the reason many investigators have proposed, our results suggested that false detection was not necessarily due to the presence of the target sequence of CF128F in the feces of non-target hosts. Instead, we found sequences of non-target hosts having single internal mismatches with CF128F. Those mismatches were well tolerated in PCR, partly due to the universality of Bac708R. To improve the detection performance, we designed a novel primer CF592R (targeting the same clade of sequences as CF128F) to substitute Bac708R. The use of CF529R alleviated false detection and also led to a tenfold reduction in detection limit in the samples tested, compared to the use of Bac708R. Many other end-point PCR assays that detect the 16S rRNA genes in Bacteroidales also use a host-associated primer to couple with Bac708R, and low specificity or sensitivity has been reported. Based on our findings for CF128F, we suggest that the suitability of Bac708R in those PCR assays needs to be revisited.     

Tracking the Primary Sources of Fecal Pollution in a Tropical Watershed in a One-Year Study

A study was conducted to determine the primary sources of fecal pollution in a subtropical watershed using host-specific assays developed in temperate regions. Water samples (n = 534) from 10 different sites along the Rio Grande de Arecibo (RGA) watershed were collected mostly on a weekly basis (54 sampling events) during 13 months. DNA extracts from water samples were used in PCR assays to determine the occurrence of fecal bacteria (Bacteroidales, Clostridium coccoides, and enterococci) and human-, cattle-, swine-, and chicken-specific fecal sources. Feces from 12 different animals (n = 340) and wastewater treatment samples (n = 16) were analyzed to determine the specificity and distribution of host-specific assays. The human-specific assay (HF183) was found to be highly specific, as it did not cross-react with nontarget samples. The cattle marker (CF128) cross-reacted to some extent with swine, chicken, and turkeys and was present in 64% of the cattle samples tested. The swine assays showed poor host specificity, while the three chicken assays showed poor host distribution. Differences in the detection of host-specific markers were noted per site. While human and cattle assays showed moderate average detection rates throughout the watershed, areas impacted by wastewater treatment plants and cattle exhibited the highest prevalence of these markers. When conditional probability for positive signals was determined for each of the markers, the results indicated higher confidence levels for the human assay and lower levels for all the other assays. Overall, the results from this study suggest that additional assays are needed, particularly to track cattle, chicken, and swine fecal pollution sources in the RGA watershed. The results also suggest that the geographic stability of genetic markers needs to be determined prior to conducting applied source tracking studies in tropical settings.     

Detection and persistence of fecal Bacteroidales as water quality indicators in unchlorinated drinking water

The results of this study support the use of fecal Bacteroidales qPCR as a rapid method to complement traditional, culture-dependent, water quality indicators in systems where drinking water is supplied without chlorination or other forms of disinfection. A SYBR-green based, quantitative PCR assay was developed to determine the concentration of fecal Bacteroidales 16S rRNA gene copies. The persistence of a Bacteroides vulgatus pure culture and fecal Bacteroidales from a wastewater inoculum was determined in unchlorinated drinking water at 10 °C. B. vulgatus 16S rRNA gene copies persisted throughout the experimental period (200 days) in sterile drinking water but decayed faster in natural drinking water, indicating that the natural microbiota accelerated decay. In a simulated fecal contamination of unchlorinated drinking water, the decay of fecal Bacteroidales 16S rRNA gene copies was considerably faster than the pure culture but similar to that of Escherichia coli from the same wastewater inoculum.     

Quantification of host-specific <Emphasis Type="Italic">Bacteroides–Prevotella</Emphasis> 16S rRNA genetic markers for assessment of fecal pollution in freshwater

Based on the comparative 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis of fecal DNAs, we identified one human-, three cow-, and two pig-specific Bacteroides–Prevotella 16S rRNA genetic markers, designed host-specific real-time polymerase chain reaction (real-time PCR) primer sets, and successfully developed real-time PCR assay to quantify the fecal contamination derived from human, cow, and pig in natural river samples. The specificity of each newly designed host-specific primer pair was evaluated on fecal DNAs extracted from these host feces. All three cow-specific and two pig-specific primer sets amplified only target fecal DNAs (in the orders of 9–11 log₁₀ copies per gram of wet feces), showing high host specificity. This real-time PCR assay was then applied to the river water samples with different fecal contamination sources and levels. It was confirmed that this assay could sufficiently discriminate and quantify human, cow, and pig fecal contamination. There was a moderate level of correlation between the Bacteroides–Prevotella group-specific 16S rRNA gene markers with fecal coliforms (r ² = 0.49), whereas no significant correlation was found between the human-specific Bacteroides 16S rRNA gene with total and fecal coliforms. Using a simple filtration method, the minimum detection limits of this assay were in the range of 50–800 copies/100 ml. With a combined sample processing and analysis time of less than 8 h, this real-time PCR assay is useful for monitoring or identifying spatial and temporal distributions of host-specific fecal contaminations in natural water environments.     

Basin-Wide Analysis of the Dynamics of Fecal Contamination and Fecal Source Identification in Tillamook Bay, Oregon

The objectives of this study were to elucidate spatial and temporal dynamics in source-specific Bacteroidales 16S rRNA genetic marker data across a watershed; to compare these dynamics to fecal indicator counts, general measurements of water quality, and climatic forces; and to identify geographic areas of intense exposure to specific sources of contamination. Samples were collected during a 2-year period in the Tillamook basin in Oregon at 30 sites along five river tributaries and in Tillamook Bay. We performed Bacteroidales PCR assays with general, ruminant-source-specific, and human-source-specific primers to identify fecal sources. We determined the Escherichia coli most probable number, temperature, turbidity, and 5-day precipitation. Climate and water quality data collectively supported a rainfall runoff pattern for microbial source input that mirrored the annual precipitation cycle. Fecal sources were statistically linked more closely to ruminants than to humans; there was a 40% greater probability of detecting a ruminant source marker than a human source marker across the basin. On a sample site basis, the addition of fecal source tracking data provided new information linking elevated fecal indicator bacterial loads to specific point and nonpoint sources of fecal pollution in the basin. Inconsistencies in E. coli and host-specific marker trends suggested that the factors that control the quantity of fecal indicators in the water column are different than the factors that influence the presence of Bacteroidales markers at specific times of the year. This may be important if fecal indicator counts are used as a criterion for source loading potential in receiving waters.     

Toolbox Approaches Using Molecular Markers and 16S rRNA Gene Amplicon Data Sets for Identification of Fecal Pollution in Surface Water

In this study, host-associated molecular markers and bacterial 16S rRNA gene community analysis using high-throughput sequencing were used to identify the sources of fecal pollution in environmental waters in Brisbane, Australia. A total of 92 fecal and composite wastewater samples were collected from different host groups (cat, cattle, dog, horse, human, and kangaroo), and 18 water samples were collected from six sites (BR1 to BR6) along the Brisbane River in Queensland, Australia. Bacterial communities in the fecal, wastewater, and river water samples were sequenced. Water samples were also tested for the presence of bird-associated (GFD), cattle-associated (CowM3), horse-associated, and human-associated (HF183) molecular markers, to provide multiple lines of evidence regarding the possible presence of fecal pollution associated with specific hosts. Among the 18 water samples tested, 83%, 33%, 17%, and 17% were real-time PCR positive for the GFD, HF183, CowM3, and horse markers, respectively. Among the potential sources of fecal pollution in water samples from the river, DNA sequencing tended to show relatively small contributions from wastewater treatment plants (up to 13% of sequence reads). Contributions from other animal sources were rarely detected and were very small (<3% of sequence reads). Source contributions determined via sequence analysis versus detection of molecular markers showed variable agreement. A lack of relationships among fecal indicator bacteria, host-associated molecular markers, and 16S rRNA gene community analysis data was also observed. Nonetheless, we show that bacterial community and host-associated molecular marker analyses can be combined to identify potential sources of fecal pollution in an urban river. This study is a proof of concept, and based on the results, we recommend using bacterial community analysis (where possible) along with PCR detection or quantification of host-associated molecular markers to provide information on the sources of fecal pollution in waterways.     

分子标记物在禽类粪便污染溯源中的研究及应用进展

排入环境后的禽类粪便不仅会造成水体和土壤环境污染,且其携带的致病菌对人类健康也存在潜在危害,因此快速准确地识别并控制粪便污染源对环境保护和人类健康至关重要。微生物溯源（Microbial source tracking,MST）技术可以利用分子标记物识别人和不同动物的粪便污染,从而有助于及时发现并控制粪便污染。鉴于禽类粪便对环境和人类健康的危害,越来越多的禽类MST标记物被开发并用于禽类的粪便污染溯源研究。归纳总结了多种禽类（如鸡、鸭、鸽子、海鸥、加拿大雁和沙丘鹤等） MST分子标记物及其敏感性和特异性,重点综述了禽类分子标记物的基因来源,包括细菌16S rRNA基因、线粒体DNA和功能基因等。其中,细菌16S rRNA基因在标记物设计中的应用最为广泛,源指示菌主要包括厚壁菌门（Firmicutes）、拟杆菌目（Bacteroidales）、放线菌门（Actinobacteria）、变形菌门（Proteobacteria）和梭杆菌门（Fusobacteria）及其家族成员;以cytb基因、ND5基因、16S rRNA基因和ND2基因等线粒体DNA （Mitochondrial DNA,mtDNA）为设计来源的禽类MST标记物在溯源研究中指示效果最好,具有很大的应用潜能;使用功能基因作为设计来源的禽类MST标记物种类较少,且均表现出较低的敏感性,但是将功能基因作为MST标记物的思路具有一定的参考价值。通过对多种禽类标记物指示效果的比较,能为科研人员快速选择禽类标记物时提供一定的参考。此外,还对禽类MST技术的现存问题进行了分析总结,并对其在我国的发展进行了展望,以期促进MST技术在我国环境质量监测领域中的发展和应用。     

Molecular Diversity of Bacteroidales in Fecal and Environmental Samples and Swine-Associated Subpopulations

Several swine-specific microbial source tracking methods are based on PCR assays targeting Bacteroidales 16S rRNA gene sequences. The limited application of these assays can be explained by the poor understanding of their molecular diversity in fecal sources and environmental waters. In order to address this, we studied the diversity of 9,340 partial (>600 bp in length) Bacteroidales 16S rRNA gene sequences from 13 fecal sources and nine feces-contaminated watersheds. The compositions of major Bacteroidales populations were analyzed to determine which host and environmental sequences were contributing to each group. This information allowed us to identify populations which were both exclusive to swine fecal sources and detected in swine-contaminated waters. Phylogenetic and diversity analyses revealed that some markers previously believed to be highly specific to swine populations are shared by multiple hosts, potentially explaining the cross-amplification signals obtained with nontargeted hosts. These data suggest that while many Bacteroidales populations are cosmopolitan, others exhibit a preferential host distribution and may be able to survive different environmental conditions. This study further demonstrates the importance of elucidating the diversity patterns of targeted bacterial groups to develop more inclusive fecal source tracking applications.     

Development of Bacteroides 16S rRNA gene TaqMan-based real-time PCR assays for estimation of total, human, and bovine fecal pollution in water

Bacteroides species are promising indicators for differentiating livestock and human fecal contamination in water because of their high concentration in feces and potential host specificity. In this study, a real-time PCR assay was designed to target Bacteroides species (AllBac) present in human, cattle, and equine feces. Direct PCR amplification (without DNA extraction) using the AllBac assay was tested on feces diluted in water. Fecal concentrations and threshold cycle were linearly correlated, indicating that the AllBac assay can be used to estimate the total amount of fecal contamination in water. Real-time PCR assays were also designed for bovine-associated (BoBac) and human-associated (HuBac) Bacteroides 16S rRNA genes. Assay specificities were tested using human, bovine, swine, canine, and equine fecal samples. The BoBac assay was specific for bovine fecal samples (100% true-positive identification; 0% false-positive identification). The HuBac assay had a 100% true-positive identification, but it also had a 32% false-positive rate with potential for cross-amplification with swine feces. The assays were tested using creek water samples from three different watersheds. Creek water did not inhibit PCR, and results from the AllBac assay were correlated with those from Escherichia coli concentrations (r2= 0.85). The percentage of feces attributable to bovine and human sources was determined for each sample by comparing the values obtained from the BoBac and HuBac assays with that from the AllBac assay. These results suggest that real-time PCR assays without DNA extraction can be used to quantify fecal concentrations and provide preliminary fecal source identification in watersheds.     

Development of Bacteroides 16S rRNA Gene TaqMan-Based Real-Time PCR Assays for Estimation of Total, Human, and Bovine Fecal Pollution in Water

Bacteroides species are promising indicators for differentiating livestock and human fecal contamination in water because of their high concentration in feces and potential host specificity. In this study, a real-time PCR assay was designed to target Bacteroides species (AllBac) present in human, cattle, and equine feces. Direct PCR amplification (without DNA extraction) using the AllBac assay was tested on feces diluted in water. Fecal concentrations and threshold cycle were linearly correlated, indicating that the AllBac assay can be used to estimate the total amount of fecal contamination in water. Real-time PCR assays were also designed for bovine-associated (BoBac) and human-associated (HuBac) Bacteroides 16S rRNA genes. Assay specificities were tested using human, bovine, swine, canine, and equine fecal samples. The BoBac assay was specific for bovine fecal samples (100% true-positive identification; 0% false-positive identification). The HuBac assay had a 100% true-positive identification, but it also had a 32% false-positive rate with potential for cross-amplification with swine feces. The assays were tested using creek water samples from three different watersheds. Creek water did not inhibit PCR, and results from the AllBac assay were correlated with those from Escherichia coli concentrations (r² = 0.85). The percentage of feces attributable to bovine and human sources was determined for each sample by comparing the values obtained from the BoBac and HuBac assays with that from the AllBac assay. These results suggest that real-time PCR assays without DNA extraction can be used to quantify fecal concentrations and provide preliminary fecal source identification in watersheds.     

Estimation of Pig Fecal Contamination in a River Catchment by Real-Time PCR Using Two Pig-Specific Bacteroidales 16S rRNA Genetic Markers

The microbiological quality of coastal or river water can be affected by fecal contamination from human or animal sources. To discriminate pig fecal pollution from other pollution, a library-independent microbial source tracking method targeting Bacteroidales host-specific 16S rRNA gene markers by real-time PCR was designed. Two pig-specific Bacteroidales markers (Pig-1-Bac and Pig-2-Bac) were designed using 16S rRNA gene Bacteroidales clone libraries from pig feces and slurry. For these two pig markers, 98 to 100% sensitivity and 100% specificity were obtained when tested by TaqMan real-time PCR. A decrease in the concentrations of Pig-1-Bac and Pig-2-Bac markers was observed throughout the slurry treatment chain. The two newly designed pig-specific Bacteroidales markers, plus the human-specific (HF183) and ruminant-specific (BacR) Bacteroidales markers, were then applied to river water samples (n = 24) representing 14 different sites from the French Daoulas River catchment (Brittany, France). Pig-1-Bac and Pig-2-Bac were quantified in 25% and 62.5%, respectively, of samples collected around pig farms, with concentrations ranging from 3.6 to 4.1 log₁₀ copies per 100 ml of water. They were detected in water samples collected downstream from pig farms but never detected near cattle farms. HF183 was quantified in 90% of water samples collected downstream near Daoulas town, with concentrations ranging between 3.6 and 4.4 log₁₀ copies per 100 ml of water, and BacR in all water samples collected around cattle farms, with concentrations ranging between 4.6 and 6.0 log₁₀ copies per 100 ml of water. The results of this study highlight that pig fecal contamination was not as frequent as human or bovine fecal contamination and that fecal pollution generally came from multiple origins. The two pig-specific Bacteroidales markers can be applied to environmental water samples to detect pig fecal pollution.Human and animal fecal pollution of coastal environments affects shellfish and recreational water quality and safety, in addition to causing economic losses from the closure of shellfish harvesting areas and from bathing restrictions (13, 19, 33). Human feces are known to contain human-specific enteric pathogens (3, 18, 28), but animals can also be reservoirs for numerous enteric human pathogens, such as Escherichia coli O157:H17, Salmonella spp., Mycobacterium spp., or Listeria spp., that may persist in the soil or surface waters (6, 8, 22, 24). Among animals, pigs are known to carry human pathogens that are excreted with fecal wastes. There are approximately 125 million pigs in the European Union (EU) and 114 million in North America (12, 36, 48), generating an estimated 100 and 91 million tons of pig slurry per year, respectively (4). France, the third largest pig producer in the EU, with about 23,000 farms, generates 8 to 10 million tons of pig slurry per year. Brittany accounts for 56.1% of the total national pig production on only 6% (27,200 km²) of the French territory, though it has 40% (2,700 km) of the coastline. This production could contaminate the environment when tanks on farms overflow, when slurry or compost is spread onto soils, or to a lesser extent, when lagoon surface waters are used for irrigation (38, 47, 52).Fecal contamination in shellfish harvesting and bathing areas is currently evaluated by the detection and enumeration of culturable facultative-anaerobic bacteria, such as E. coli, enterococci, or fecal coliforms (11), in shellfish and bathing waters (European Directives 2006/113/CE and 2006/7/CE). Pigs are among the potential sources of E. coli inputs to the environment; a pig produces approximately 1 × 10⁷ E. coli bacteria per gram of feces, which corresponds to an E. coli flow rate per day that is 28 times higher than that for one human (16, 34, 55).E. coli is not a good indicator of fecal sources of pollution in water because of its presence in both human and animal feces; therefore, alternative fecal indicators must be used. Microbial source tracking methods (44) are being developed to discriminate between human and nonhuman sources of fecal contamination and to distinguish contamination from different animal species (17, 46, 54). Many of these methods are library dependent, requiring a large number of isolates to be cultured and tested, which is time consuming and labor intensive. For these reasons, library-independent methods are preferred for the detection of host-specific markers.The detection of host-specific Bacteroidales markers is a promising library-independent method and has been used for identifying contamination from human and bovine origins (25, 29, 39, 40, 45). In this study, we selected Bacteroidales 16S rRNA gene markers and real-time PCR to focus on fecal contamination from pigs. To date, only one pig-specific Bacteroidales 16S rRNA gene marker has been developed and used on water samples for the identification of pig fecal contamination by real-time PCR assay (SYBR green) (37). When this pig-specific Bacteroidales marker was tested on a small number of fecal samples (n = 16), it showed some cross-reaction with human and cow feces.The present study investigated pig fecal contamination in a French catchment, the Daoulas estuary (Brittany), which has commercial and recreational shellfish harvesting areas and which is potentially subject to fecal contamination. The aims of the present study were (i) to design new primers for the detection and quantification of pig-specific Bacteroidales 16S rRNA genes by TaqMan analysis; (ii) to validate the sensitivity and specificity of the new primers and TaqMan assay using target (feces, slurry, compost, and lagoon water samples) and nontarget (human and other animal sources) DNA, respectively; and (iii) to evaluate the TaqMan assay for proper detection and quantitative estimation of pig-associated fecal pollution. The study represents the first application of pig-specific Bacteroidales markers using a TaqMan assay in Europe and included a monitoring study of marker levels throughout the various stages of slurry treatment.     

Evaluation of Swine-Specific PCR Assays Used for Fecal Source Tracking and Analysis of Molecular Diversity of Swine-Specific “Bacteroidales” Populations

In this study, we evaluated the specificity, distribution, and sensitivity of Prevotella strain-based (PF163 and PigBac1) and methanogen-based (P23-2) PCR assays proposed to detect swine fecal pollution in environmental waters. The assays were tested against 222 fecal DNA extracts derived from target and nontarget animal hosts and against 34 groundwater and 15 surface water samples from five different sites. We also investigated the phylogenetic diversity of 1,340 “Bacteroidales” 16S rRNA gene sequences derived from swine feces, swine waste lagoons, swine manure pits, and waters adjacent to swine operations. Most swine fecal samples were positive for the host-specific Prevotella-based PCR assays (80 to 87%), while fewer were positive with the methanogen-targeted PCR assay (53%). Similarly, the Prevotella markers were detected more frequently than the methanogen-targeted assay markers in waters historically impacted with swine fecal contamination. However, the PF163 PCR assay cross-reacted with 23% of nontarget fecal DNA extracts, although Bayesian statistics suggested that it yielded the highest probability of detecting pig fecal contamination in a given water sample. Phylogenetic analyses revealed previously unknown swine-associated clades comprised of clones from geographically diverse swine sources and from water samples adjacent to swine operations that are not targeted by the Prevotella assays. While deeper sequencing coverage might be necessary to better understand the molecular diversity of fecal Bacteroidales species, results of sequence analyses supported the presence of swine fecal pollution in the studied watersheds. Overall, due to nontarget cross amplification and poor geographic stability of currently available host-specific PCR assays, development of additional assays is necessary to accurately detect sources of swine fecal pollution.The size of swine farming operations has increased significantly during the last few decades as a result of the high demand for pork products. In fact, pork is now considered the most popular meat worldwide (15). In the United States, the number of large confined swine animal units increased by 3 orders of magnitude from 1982 to 1997 (18), making the swine industry among the top three producers of domesticated animal feces. A direct consequence of this trend is the increase in swine fecal waste, which in turn has raised environmental concerns. When introduced to water, swine fecal waste can present a risk to human health because this waste can harbor a variety of human pathogens (5, 13, 15, 21, 36). The diversity and relatively high frequency of human pathogens in swine feces make swine important reservoirs of zoonotic pathogens. Moreover, the marked increase in the number of large operations has resulted in increased manure production and application in small geographic areas, creating an imbalance between the assimilative capacity of manure-treated farmland and the amount of manure nutrients produced on each farm. This imbalance is evidenced by the 20% increase (from 1982 to 1997) in nitrogen and phosphorus produced in swine operations, thus potentially contributing to the detrimental eutrophication of aquatic ecosystems (18). Swine manure spills and leaks are commonplace in the top hog production states, such as Iowa and North Carolina, due to failure or overflow of manure storage, uncontrolled runoff from open feedlots, improper manure application on cropland, deliberate pumping of manure onto the ground, and intentional breaches in storage lagoons (28, 37).Recently, swine-associated PCR-based methods targeting members of the “Bacteroidales” order (i.e., Prevotella species) and methanogen populations (12, 29, 35) have been proposed to discriminate swine fecal pollution events from other potential fecal contributions (i.e., human, bovine, and wildlife) to environmental waters. Nevertheless, the value of these assays in reliably detecting fecal pollution sources in watershed-based studies has not been thoroughly investigated. The main goals of this study were to determine host specificity, frequency of detection, and detection limits of currently available swine-associated PCR-based, microbial source tracking assays. To achieve these objectives, assays were tested against swine and nontarget fecal samples, samples from swine manure pits and swine waste lagoons, and water samples presumed to be impacted by swine fecal sources. Furthermore, we investigated the phylogenetic diversity of Bacteroidales 16S rRNA gene sequences derived from some of the aforementioned samples to resolve the level of specificity, relative abundance, and environmental occurrence of Bacteroidales-specific 16S rRNA gene sequences.     

Assessment of fecal pollution sources in a small northern-plains watershed using PCR and phylogenetic analyses of Bacteroidetes 16S rRNA gene

We evaluated the efficacy, sensitivity, host-specificity, and spatial/temporal dynamics of human- and ruminant-specific 16S rRNA gene Bacteroidetes markers used to assess the sources of fecal pollution in a fecally impacted watershed. Phylogenetic analyses of 1271 fecal and environmental 16S rRNA gene clones were also performed to study the diversity of Bacteroidetes in this watershed. The host-specific assays indicated that ruminant feces were present in 28-54% of the water samples and in all sampling seasons, with increasing frequency in downstream sites. The human-targeted assays indicated that only 3-5% of the water samples were positive for human fecal signals, although a higher percentage of human-associated signals (19-24%) were detected in sediment samples. Phylogenetic analysis indicated that 57% of all water clones clustered with yet-to-be-cultured Bacteroidetes species associated with sequences obtained from ruminant feces, further supporting the prevalence of ruminant contamination in this watershed. However, since several clusters contained sequences from multiple sources, future studies need to consider the potential cosmopolitan nature of these bacterial populations when assessing fecal pollution sources using Bacteroidetes markers. Moreover, additional data is needed in order to understand the distribution of Bacteroidetes host-specific markers and their relationship to water quality regulatory standards.     

Comparison of Sewage and Animal Fecal Microbiomes by Using Oligotyping Reveals Potential Human Fecal Indicators in Multiple Taxonomic Groups

Most DNA-based microbial source tracking (MST) approaches target host-associated organisms within the order Bacteroidales, but the gut microbiota of humans and other animals contain organisms from an array of other taxonomic groups that might provide indicators of fecal pollution sources. To discern between human and nonhuman fecal sources, we compared the V6 regions of the 16S rRNA genes detected in fecal samples from six animal hosts to those found in sewage (as a proxy for humans). We focused on 10 abundant genera and used oligotyping, which can detect subtle differences between rRNA gene sequences from ecologically distinct organisms. Our analysis showed clear patterns of differential oligotype distributions between sewage and animal samples. Over 100 oligotypes of human origin occurred preferentially in sewage samples, and 99 human oligotypes were sewage specific. Sequences represented by the sewage-specific oligotypes can be used individually for development of PCR-based assays or together with the oligotypes preferentially associated with sewage to implement a signature-based approach. Analysis of sewage from Spain and Brazil showed that the sewage-specific oligotypes identified in U.S. sewage have the potential to be used as global alternative indicators of human fecal pollution. Environmental samples with evidence of prior human fecal contamination had consistent ratios of sewage signature oligotypes that corresponded to the trends observed for sewage. Our methodology represents a promising approach to identifying new bacterial taxa for MST applications and further highlights the potential of the family Lachnospiraceae to provide human-specific markers. In addition to source tracking applications, the patterns of the fine-scale population structure within fecal taxa suggest a fundamental relationship between bacteria and their hosts.     

Coherence among Different Microbial Source Tracking Markers in a Small Agricultural Stream with or without Livestock Exclusion Practices

Over 1,400 water samples were collected biweekly over 6 years from an intermittent stream protected and unprotected from pasturing cattle. The samples were monitored for host-specific Bacteroidales markers, Cryptosporidium species/genotypes, viruses and coliphages associated with humans or animals, and bacterial zoonotic pathogens. Ruminant Bacteroidales markers did not increase within the restricted cattle access reach of the stream, whereas the ruminant Bacteroidales marker increased significantly in the unrestricted cattle access reach. Human Bacteroidales markers significantly increased downstream of homes where septic issues were documented. Wildlife Bacteroidales markers were detected downstream of the cattle exclusion practice where stream and riparian habitat was protected, but detections decreased after the unrestricted pasture, where the stream and riparian zone was unprotected from livestock. Detection of a large number of human viruses was shown to increase downstream of homes, and similar trends were observed for the human Bacteroidales marker. There was considerable interplay among biomarkers with stream flow, season, and the cattle exclusion practices. There were no to very weak associations with Bacteroidales markers and bacterial, viral, and parasitic pathogens. Overall, discrete sample-by-sample coherence among the different microbial source tracking markers that expressed a similar microbial source was minimal, but spatial trends were physically meaningful in terms of land use (e.g., beneficial management practice) effects on sources of fecal pollution.     

Phylogenetic analysis of Bacteroidales 16S rRNA gene sequences from human and animal effluents and assessment of ruminant faecal pollution by real‐time PCR

Aims: The aims of this study were to evaluate the host‐specific distribution of Bacteroidales 16S rRNA gene sequences from human‐ and animal‐related effluents and faeces, and to define a ruminant‐specific marker. Methods and Results: Bacteroidales 16S rRNA gene clone libraries were constructed from samples of effluent (sewage, bovine manure and pig slurry) and faeces (human, bovine, pig and wild bird), using PCR primers targeting order Bacteroidales. The phylogenetic analysis revealed six main distinct human‐, bovine‐, pig‐ and wild bird‐specific clusters. From the bovine‐specific cluster II, we designed a ruminant‐specific marker, Rum‐2‐Bac, and this showed 97% sensitivity (n = 30) and 100% specificity (n = 40) when tested by TaqMan^® real‐time PCR. Average concentrations of this marker in bovine and sheep faeces and in bovine manure were 8·2 ± 0·5, 8·4 ± 1·3 and 7 ± 0·5 log₁₀ copies per gram, respectively. It was also quantified in samples of runoff water impacted by bovine manure, with average concentrations of 5·1 ± 0·3 log₁₀ copies per millilitre water. Conclusions: Our results confirmed that some members of Bacteroidales isolated from effluents and faeces had host‐specific distributions. Identification of a bovine‐specific cluster made it possible to design a reliable ruminant‐specific marker. Significance and Impact of the Study: The host‐specific distribution of Bacteroidales sequences from effluents mirrored the host‐specific distribution of sequences observed in individual faeces. This efficient new ruminant‐specific Bacteroidales 16S rRNA marker represents a useful addition to the microbial source tracking toolbox.     

Microplate Subtractive Hybridization To Enrich for Bacteroidales Genetic Markers for Fecal Source Identification

The ability to identify sources of fecal pollution plays a key role in the analysis of human health risk and the implementation of water resource management strategies. One approach to this problem involves the identification of bacterial lineages or gene sequences that are found exclusively in a particular host species or group. We used subtractive hybridization to enrich for target host-specific fecal Bacteroidales rRNA gene fragments that were different from those of very closely related reference (subtracter) host sources. Target host rRNA gene fragments were hybridized to subtracter rRNA gene fragments immobilized in a microplate well, and target sequences that did not hybridize were cloned and sequenced for PCR primer design. The use of microplates for DNA immobilization resulted in a one-step subtractive hybridization in which the products could be directly amplified with PCR. The new host-specific primers designed from subtracted target fragments differentiated among very closely related Bacteroidales rRNA gene sequences and distinguished between similar fecal sources, such as elk and cow or human and domestic pet (dog).     

Quantitative PCR for Genetic Markers of Human Fecal Pollution

Assessment of health risk and fecal bacterial loads associated with human fecal pollution requires reliable host-specific analytical methods and a rapid quantification approach. We report the development of quantitative PCR assays for quantification of two recently described human-specific genetic markers targeting Bacteroidales-like cell surface-associated genes. Each assay exhibited a range of quantification from 10 to 1 × 10⁶ copies of target DNA. For each assay, internal amplification controls were developed to detect the presence or absence of amplification inhibitors. The assays predominantly detected human fecal specimens and exhibited specificity levels greater than 97% when tested against 265 fecal DNA extracts from 22 different animal species. The abundance of each human-specific genetic marker in primary effluent wastewater samples collected from 20 geographically distinct locations was measured and compared to quantities estimated by real-time PCR assays specific for rRNA gene sequences from total Bacteroidales and enterococcal fecal microorganisms. Assay performances combined with the prevalence of DNA targets in sewage samples provide experimental evidence supporting the potential application of these quantitative methods for monitoring fecal pollution in ambient environmental waters.Waterborne diseases that originate from human fecal pollution remain a significant public health issue. As a result, a large number of methods have been developed to detect and quantify human fecal pollution (10, 12, 18, 20). The majority of these methods are based on real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR) assays designed to estimate the concentrations of 16S rRNA gene sequences from various subpopulations within the order Bacteroidales. This bacterial order constitutes a large proportion of the normal gut microbiota of most animals, including humans (3, 15, 27). Bacterial 16S rRNA genes are useful as markers because they have relatively low mutation rates (7) and are typically present in multiple operons, increasing template DNA levels available for detection (2, 11, 17, 29). While several studies have demonstrated the value of Bacteroides 16S rRNA gene-based qPCR assays, currently available assays cannot discriminate between several animal sources closely associated with humans, including cats, dogs, and/or swine (10, 12, 18, 20). Alternative qPCR assays targeting genes directly involved in host-specific interactions may be capable of increased discrimination of fecal pollution sources (22, 23) and are needed to complement existing qPCR-based approaches used to identify sources of human fecal pollution.A recent metagenomic survey of a human fecal bacterial community using genome fragment enrichment has led to the identification of hundreds of candidate human fecal bacterium-specific DNA sequences (23). PCR assays targeting two gene sequences encoding a hypothetical protein potentially involved in remodeling of bacterial surface polysaccharides and lipopolysaccharides (assay 19) and a putative RNA polymerase extracytoplasmic function sigma factor (assay 22) from Bacteroidales-like microorganisms exhibited a high level of specificity (100%) for human fecal material (23). However, it remained to be determined whether these reported chromosomal DNA sequences are abundant and uniform enough within human populations to be detected once diluted in the environment. On the basis of these considerations, the next steps toward the application of these gene sequences for water quality monitoring applications were to design qPCR assays for their detection and then to use these assays to evaluate the overall abundance and distribution of these sequences in human populations relative to those of rRNA gene sequences from different currently recognized fecal indicator bacterial groups.Here, we report the development of two qPCR assays for quantification of the human-specific DNA sequences targeted by previously reported PCR assays 19 and 22 (23). Method performance characteristics, including specificity, range of quantification (ROQ), limit of quantification, amplification efficiency, and analytical precision, were defined for each assay. An internal amplification control (IAC) was designed to monitor for the presence of inhibitors commonly associated with environmental sampling that can confound DNA target copy number estimations. Finally, the abundance of each DNA target in primary effluent wastewater samples representative of 20 geographically distinct human populations was measured by qPCR analysis. In addition, the abundances of these human-specific DNA genes in wastewater were compared to those of rRNA genes of Bacteroidales and enterococci, two general fecal indicator bacterial groups that have been widely used for water quality testing.