Efficient Expression of the Mosquito Larvicidal Binary Toxin Gene from <Emphasis Type="Italic">Bacillus sphaericus</Emphasis> in <Emphasis Type="Italic">Escherichia coli</Emphasis>

The binary toxin gene encoding BinA (42 kDa) and BinB (51 kDa) from Bacillus sphaericus strain 2297 was cloned and expressed in E. coli. Low expression level was found when both proteins were expressed from a single operon. High expression was observed when the gene encoding an individual protein was placed downstream of the T7 promoter. The expression level of BinB was not different when expressed alone (non-fusion) or as a fusion form with T7 peptide (T7-BinB). Both forms of BinB were equally stable. Unlike BinB, the non-fusion form of BinA was less stable than T7-BinA. The mosquito larvicidal test showed that BinA or BinB alone was not toxic to mosquito larvae, but high toxicity was found when both BinA and BinB were applied. The results suggest that a short peptide of T7 linked to the N-terminus of either BinA or BinB does not affect their toxicity, but may make the toxin, especially BinA, more stable.     

Permeabilization of Model Lipid Membranes by Bacillus sphaericus Mosquitocidal Binary Toxin and its Individual Components

The high larvicidal effect of Bacillus sphaericus (Bs), a mosquito control agent, originates from the presence of a binary toxin (Bs Bin) composed of two proteins (BinA and BinB) that work together to lyse gut cells of susceptible larvae. We demonstrate for the first time that the binary toxin and its individual components permeabilize receptor-free large unilamellar phospholipid vesicles (LUVs) and planar lipid bilayers (PLBs) by a mechanism of pore formation. Calcein-release experiments showed that LUV permeabilization was optimally achieved at alkaline pH and in the presence of acidic lipids. BinA was more efficient than BinB, BinB facilitated the BinA effect, and their stoichiometric mixture was more effective than the full Bin toxin. In PLBs, BinA formed voltage-dependent channels of ≈100–200 pS with long open times and a high open probability. Larger channels (≥400 pS) were also observed. BinB, which inserted less easily, formed smaller channels (≤100 pS) with shorter mean open times. Channels observed after sequential addition of the two components, or formed by their 1:1 mixture (w/w), displayed BinA-like activity. Bs Bin toxin was less efficient at forming channels than the BinA/BinB mixture, with channels displaying the BinA channel behavior. Our data support the concept of BinA being principally responsible for pore formation in lipid membranes with BinB, the binding component of the toxin, playing a role in promoting channel activity. Received: 29 March 2001/Revised: 20 July 2001     

Cys31, Cys47, and Cys195 in BinA Are Essential for Toxicity of a Binary Toxin from Bacillus sphaericus

The mosquito larvicidal binary toxin produced by Bacillus sphaericus is composed of 2 proteins called BinA and BinB. While BinB acts as specificity determinant, BinA is expected to bind to BinB, translocates into cytosol, and exerts its activity via an unknown mechanism. To study the role of cysteine in BinA, 3 cysteine residues were substituted by alanine and serine. Substitution at Cys195 significantly reduced the toxin activity, whereas substitution at Cys31 and Cys47 abolished its toxicity. Intrinsic fluorescent analysis suggested that all mutant proteins should have similar tertiary structure to that of the wild type. Analysis of the mutant protein on sodium dodecyl sulfate–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis with and without a reducing agent indicated that all 3 cysteine residues were not involved in disulfide bond formation within the BinA molecule. This is the first report to demonstrate that cysteine residues at 3 positions in BinA are required for full toxicity of the binary toxin. They may play a critical role during oligomerization or interaction between BinA and BinB to form the active complex.     

Essential role of tryptophan residues in toxicity of binary toxin from Bacillus sphaericus

Bacillus sphaericus produces mosquito-larvicidal binary toxin composed of BinA and BinB. While BinB is expected to bind to a specific receptor on the cell membrane, BinA interacts to BinB or BinB receptor complex and translocates into the cytosol to exert its activity via unknown mechanism. To investigate functional roles of aromatic cluster in BinA, amino acids at positions Y213, Y214, Y215, W222 and W226 were substituted by leucine. All mutant proteins were highly produced and their secondary structures were not affected by these substitutions. All mutants are able to insert into lipid monolayers as observed by Langmuir-Blodgett trough and could permeabilize the liposomes in a similar manner as the wild type. However, mosquito-larvicidal activity was abolished for W222L and W226L mutants suggesting that tryptophan residues at both positions play an important role in the toxicity of BinA, possibly involved in the cytopathological process after toxin entry into the cells.     

Purification and characterization of mosquitocidal Bacillus sphaericus BinA protein

Certain strains of Bacillus sphaericus produce a highly toxic mosquito-larvicidal binary toxin during sporulation. The binary toxin is composed of toxic BinA (41.9 kDa) and receptor binding BinB (51.4 kDa) polypeptides and is active against vectors of filariasis, encephalitis and malaria. The toxin has been tested with limited use for the control of vector mosquitoes for more than two decades. The binA gene from a local ISPC-8 strain of B. sphaericus that is highly toxic to Culex and Anopheles mosquito species was cloned into pET16b and expressed in Escherichia coli. The purified BinA protein differs by one amino acid (R197 M) from BinA of the highest toxicity strains 1593/2362/C3-41. Majority of the expressed protein was observed in inclusion bodies. BinA inclusions alone from E. coli did not show toxic activity, like reported previously. However, the active form of BinA could be purified to homogeneity from the soluble fraction of E. coli cell lysate, grown at reduced temperature after isopropyl β-d-thiogalactopyranoside induction. The purified BinA protein with and without poly-histidine tag showed LC₅₀ dose of 82.3 and 66.9 ng ml⁻¹, respectively, at 48 h against Culex quinquefasciatus larvae. The secondary structure of BinA is expected to be mainly β strands as estimated using far-UV circular dichroism. The estimates matched well with the secondary structure predictions using amino acid sequence. This is the first report of large-scale purification and accurate toxicity estimation of soluble B. sphaericus BinA. This can help in design and synthesis of improved bacterial insecticide.     

Implications of high-molecular-weight oligomers of the binary toxin from Bacillus sphaericus

The mosquito-larvicidal binary toxin produced by Bacillus sphaericus is composed of BinB and BinA, which have calculated molecular weights of 51.4 and 41.9 kDa, respectively. NaOH extracts of B. sphaericus spores were analyzed using SDS-PAGE. Stained gels showed bands with molecular weights corresponding to those of BinB and BinA as well as two additional bands at 110 and 125 kDa. The matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrum of the purified 110 and 125 kDa bands showed two peaks at 104,160 and 87,358 Da that are assigned to dimers of BinB and BinA, respectively. Mass spectral analysis of trypsin-digested 110 and 125 kDa bands showed peaks at 51,328, 43,523, 43,130, and 40,832 Da that assigned to undigested BinB, two forms of digested BinB and digested BinA, respectively. Dynamic light scattering studies showed a solution of the purified 110 and 125 kDa bands was comprised almost entirely (99.6% of total mass) of a particle with a hydrodynamic radius of 5.6+/-1.2 nm and a calculated molecular weight of 186+/-38 kDa. These data demonstrate that the binary toxin extracted from B. sphaericus spores can exist in solution as an oligomer containing two copies each of BinB and BinA.     

The <Emphasis Type="Italic">C</Emphasis>-Terminal Domain of BinA Is Responsible for <Emphasis Type="Italic">Bacillus</Emphasis> <Emphasis Type="Italic">sphaericus</Emphasis> Binary Toxin BinA–BinB Interaction

The binary toxin (Bin) from Bacillus sphaericus consists of two polypeptides, BinA (42 kDa) and BinB (51 kDa) that work together to kill susceptible mosquito larvae. To investigate the functional regions of BinA involved in the interaction with BinB, four BinA truncated fragments, from both N- and C- termini, were constructed and expressed in Escherichia coli. Neither individual nor a mixture of fragments of BinA showed larvicidal activity against Culex quinquefasciatus larvae even using a high dose of toxins. Far-Western dot blot analysis showed strong binding of both C-terminal fragments (17 and 28 kDa) to BinB protein. This is the first report to demonstrate that the C-terminal part of BinA plays an important role for the interaction with BinB.     

Crystal structure of BinB: A receptor binding component of the binary toxin from Lysinibacillus sphaericus

The binary toxin (Bin), produced by Lysinibacillus sphaericus, is composed of BinA (42 kDa) and BinB (51 kDa) proteins, which are both required for full toxicity against Culex and Anopheles mosquito larvae. Specificity of Bin toxin is determined by the binding of BinB component to a receptor present on the midgut epithelial membranes, while BinA is proposed to be a toxic component. Here, we determined the first crystal structure of the active form of BinB at a resolution of 1.75 Å. BinB possesses two distinct structural domains in its N‐ and C‐termini. The globular N‐terminal domain has a β‐trefoil scaffold which is a highly conserved architecture of some sugar binding proteins or lectins, suggesting a role of this domain in receptor‐binding. The BinB β‐rich C‐terminal domain shares similar three‐dimensional folding with aerolysin type β‐pore forming toxins, despite a low sequence identity. The BinB structure, therefore, is a new member of the aerolysin‐like toxin family, with probably similarities in the cytolytic mechanism that takes place via pore formation. Proteins 2014; 82:2703–2712. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Interaction between mosquito-larvicidal Lysinibacillus sphaericus binary toxin components: Analysis of complex formation

The two components (BinA and BinB) of Lysinibacillus sphaericus binary toxin together are highly toxic to Culex and Anopheles mosquito larvae, and have been employed world-wide to control mosquito borne diseases. Upon binding to the membrane receptor an oligomeric form (BinA2.BinB2) of the binary toxin is expected to play role in pore formation. It is not clear if these two proteins interact in solution as well, in the absence of receptor. The interactions between active forms of BinA and BinB polypeptides were probed in solution using size-exclusion chromatography, pull-down assay, surface plasmon resonance, circular dichroism, and by chemically crosslinking BinA and BinB components. We demonstrate that the two proteins interact weakly with first association and dissociation rate constants of 4.5 × 10³ M^?1 s^?1 and 0.8 s^?1, resulting in conformational change, most likely, in toxic BinA protein that could kinetically favor membrane translocation of the active oligomer. The weak interactions between the two toxin components could be stabilized by glutaraldehyde crosslinking. The cross-linked complex, interestingly, showed maximal Culex larvicidal activity (LC₅₀ value of 1.59 ng mL^?1) reported so far for combination of BinA/BinB components, and thus is an attractive option for development of new bio-pesticides for control of mosquito borne vector diseases.     

Expression and purification of the active soluble form of Bacillus sphaericus binary toxin for structural analysis

The binary toxin produced from Bacillus sphaericus is highly toxic against larvae of Culex and Anopheles mosquitoes. The two major components of the binary toxin are 42-kDa BinA and 51-kDa BinB, which are produced as crystalline inclusions during sporulation. Currently, there is no detailed knowledge of the molecular mechanism of the binary toxin, mainly due to the lack of structural information. Herein, we describe an expression protocol with modified conditions allowing production of soluble, biologically active BinA and BinB for further structural analysis. The binA and binB genes from B. sphaericus 2297 strain were independently cloned and fused with a polyhistidine tag at their N-termini. Both (His)(6)-tagged BinA and (His)(6)-tagged BinB were expressed as soluble forms at low temperature. Highly pure proteins were obtained after two-step purification by Ni-NTA affinity and size exclusion chromatography. In vitro activation by trypsin digestion generated a resistant fragment, of 40kDa for BinA, and of 45kDa for BinB, and an oligomeric complex of BinA and BinB in solution was observed after proteolytic activation. Their functional and structural properties were confirmed by a biological assay and far-UV circular dichroism, respectively. The mixture of BinA and BinB, either as a protoxin or as a trypsin-activated form, exhibited high mosquito-larvicidal activity against Culex quinquefasciatus larvae with LC(50) of about 10ng/ml, while no toxicity was observed from the single binary toxin component. Results from far-UV circular dichroism of BinA and BinB suggest the presence of mainly β-structure. The expression and purification protocols reported here will be useful for the production of the active and homogeneous binary toxin to allow further detailed structural investigation.     

Targeted Mutagenesis at Charged Residues in <Emphasis Type="Italic">Bacillus sphaericus</Emphasis> BinA Toxin Affects Mosquito-Larvicidal Activity

The mosquito-larvicidal binary toxin from Bacillus sphaericus is composed of two polypeptides called BinA and BinB with molecular masses of approximately 42 and 51 kDa. Both components are required for full activity, with BinB acting as a specificity determinant and BinA being responsible for toxic action. To investigate the role of the selected charged residues in BinA, four mutants were generated by replacing charged amino acids with alanine (R97A, E98A, R101A, and E114A). All mutant proteins were produced at high levels and formed inclusion bodies similar to that of the wild type. Mosquito-larvicidal assays against Culex quinquefasciatus larvae revealed that the mutant R97A completely lost its activity and mutants E98A, R101A, and E114A showed significantly reduced toxicity. Intrinsic fluorescence spectroscopy analysis indicated that alanine substitutions at these positions did not alter the overall structure of the toxin. Binding of the mutants to BinB was not different from that of the wild type, suggesting that these mutations did not affect BinA-BinB interaction. Results demonstrated that R97, E98, R101, and E114 neither play a direct role in maintenance of BinA structure nor are involved in BinA-BinB interaction. Since these residues are required for full activity, they may play an important role during toxin internalization and/or toxic action of BinA inside the target cells.     

Association of the components of the binary toxin from Bacillus sphaericus in solution and with model lipid bilayers

We show herein that interaction in aqueous solution of the two components of binary toxin from Bacillus sphaericus, BinA and BinB, leads to a dramatic conformational change, from beta turns or random coil, to beta structure. Also, either BinA or BinB separately or their equimolar mixture, interact with lipid bilayers resulting in further conformational changes. Upon membrane association, the change in conformation observed for BinA or BinB separately is different from that observed when the proteins are combined, indicating that proper folding depends on the presence of the complementary subunit. We also show, in contrast to previous reports, that BinB, but not BinA, is able to insert in model neutral lipid monolayers.     

Interaction of the Bacillus thuringiensis delta endotoxins Cry1Ac and Cry3Aa with the gut of the pea aphid, Acyrthosiphon pisum (Harris)

Hemipteran pests including aphids are not particularly susceptible to the effects of insecticidal Cry toxins derived from the bacterium Bacillus thuringiensis. We examined the physiological basis for the relatively low toxicity of Cry1Ac and Cry3Aa against the pea aphid, Acyrthosiphon pisum (Harris). Cry1Ac was efficiently hydrolyzed by aphid stomach membrane associated cysteine proteases (CP) producing a 60 kDa mature toxin, whereas Cry3Aa was incompletely processed and partially degraded. Cry1Ac bound to the aphid gut epithelium but showed low aphid toxicity in bioassays. Feeding of aphids on Cry1Ac in the presence or absence of GalNAc, suggested that Cry1Ac gut binding was glycan mediated. In vitro binding of biotinylated-Cry1Ac to gut BBMVs and competition assays using unlabeled Cry1Ac and GalNAc confirmed binding specificity as well as glycan mediation of Cry1Ac binding. Although Cry3Aa binding to the aphid gut membrane was not detected, Cry3Aa bound 25 and 37 kDa proteins in aphid gut BBMV in ligand blot analysis and competition assays confirmed the binding specificity of Cry3Aa. This, combined with low toxicity in feeding assays, suggests that Cry3Aa does bind the gut epithelium to some extent. This is the first systematic examination of the physiological basis for the low efficacy of Cry toxins against aphids, and analysis of Cry toxin-aphid gut interaction.     

Identification and molecular structural prediction analysis of a toxicity determinant in the Bacillus sphaericus crystal larvicidal toxin.

The operon containing the genes encoding the subunits of the binary crystal toxin of Bacillus sphaericus strain LP1-G, BinA and BinB (41.9 kDa and 51.4 kDa, respectively), was cloned and sequenced. Purified crystals were not toxic to Culex pipiens larvae. Comparison of the amino-acid sequences of this strain (Bin4) with those of the three other known toxin types (Bin1, Bin2 and Bin3) revealed mutations at six positions, including a serine at position 93 of BinA4, whereas all other types of BinA toxin from B. sphaericus had a leucine at this position. Reciprocal site-directed mutagenesis was performed to replace this serine in BinA4 from LP1-G with a leucine and the leucine in the BinA2 protein from strain 1593 with a serine. Native and mutated genes were cloned and overexpressed. Inclusion bodies were tested on C. pipiens larvae. Unlike the native Bin4 toxin, the mutated protein was toxic, and the reciprocal mutation in Bin2 led to a significant loss of toxicity. In vitro receptor-binding studies showed similar binding behaviour for native and mutated toxins. In the absence of any experimental data on the 3D structure of these proteins, sequence analysis and secondary-structure predictions were performed. Amino acid 93 of the BinA polypeptide probably belongs to an alpha helix that is sensitive to amino-acid modifications. Position 93 may be a key element in the formation of the BinA-BinB complex responsible for the toxicity and stability of B. sphaericus Bin toxins.     

High-Level Expression in <Emphasis Type="Italic">Escherichia coli</Emphasis>, Purification and Mosquito-Larvicidal Activity of the Binary Toxin from <Emphasis Type="Italic">Bacillus sphaericus</Emphasis>

The mosquito-larvicidal binary toxin produced by Bacillus sphaericus consists of two polypeptides: BinA and BinB. Both proteins function together, and maximum toxicity is obtained when both are present in equimolar ratio. Cloning and expression of each component separately in heterologous hosts led to low toxicity of the crystal proteins. To improve the expression level, the purification process, and the activity of the binary toxin, the binA and binB genes were separately cloned in Eschericia coli. Each gene was fused in frame to the glutathione S-transferase (GST) gene to be expressed as GST-fusion protein (GST-BinA and GST-BinB). A high expression level was observed from both constructs, and the fusion proteins exhibited high toxicity to Culex quinquefasciatus larvae. High-purity toxin could be obtained by affinity chromatography. The result suggests that GST moiety facilitates high protein production and enables better solubility of the toxin inclusions inside the larval gut, leading to higher toxicity of the fusion protein.     

Stability,oviposition attraction,and larvicidal activity of binary toxin from <Emphasis Type="Italic">Bacillus sphaericus</Emphasis> expressed in <Emphasis Type="Italic">Escherichia coli</Emphasis>

Bacillus sphaericus produces a two-chain binary toxin composed of BinA (42 kDa) and BinB (51 kDa), which are deposited as parasporal crystals during sporulation. The toxin is highly active against Culex larvae and Aedes and Anopheles mosquitoes, which are the principal vectors for the transmission of malaria, yellow fever, encephalitis, and dengue. The use of B. sphaericus and Bacillus thuringiensis in mosquito control programs is limited by their sedimentation in still water. In this study, the binA and binB genes were cloned and the recombinant BinAB protein was expressed in three strains of Escherichia coli. These recombinant strains were used in a toxicity assay against Culex quinquefasciatus larvae. The highest expression level was achieved when both proteins were expressed in a single operon construct. The BinAB protein expressed in the E. coli Arctic strain showed higher larvicidal activity than either of the recombinant proteins from the E. coli Ril or pLysS strains. Furthermore, it had the highest oviposition attraction (49.1%, P?相似文献   

Non conserved residues between Cqm1 and Aam1 mosquito α-glucosidases are critical for the capacity of Cqm1 to bind the Binary toxin from Lysinibacillus sphaericus

The Binary (Bin) toxin from the entomopathogenic bacterium Lysinibacillus sphaericus acts on larvae of the culicid Culex quinquefasciatus through its binding to Cqm1, a midgut-bound α-glucosidase. Specific binding by the BinB subunit to the Cqm1 receptor is essential for toxicity however the toxin is unable to bind to the Cqm1 ortholog from the refractory species Aedes aegypti (Aam1). Here, to investigate the molecular basis for the interaction between Cqm1 and BinB, recombinant Cqm1 and Aam1 were first expressed as soluble forms in Sf9 cells. The two proteins were found to display the same glycosilation patterns and BinB binding properties as the native α-glucosidases. Chimeric constructs were then generated through the exchange of reciprocal fragments between the corresponding cqm1 and aam1 cDNAs. Subsequent expression and binding experiments defined a Cqm1 segment encompassing residues S129 and A312 as critical for the interaction with BinB. Through site directed mutagenesis experiments, replacing specific sets of residues from Cqm1 with those of Aam1, the ₁₅₉GG₁₆₀ doublet was required for this interaction. Molecular modeling mapped these residues to an exposed loop within the Cqm1’s structure, compatible with a target site for BinB and providing a possible explanation for its lack of binding to Aam1.     

Intramolecular proteolytic nicking and binding of Bacillus thuringiensis Cry8Da toxin in BBMVs of Japanese beetle

Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) Cry8D insecticidal proteins are unique among Cry8 family proteins in terms of its insecticidal activity against adult Scarab beetles, such as Japanese beetle (Popillia japonica Newman). From the sequence homology with other Bt Cry proteins especially those active against beetles, such as Cry3Aa whose 3D structure is available, the structure of the Cry8D protein has been predicted to be a typical three-domain Cry protein type. In addition, the activation process of Cry8D in gut juice of susceptible insects is presumed to be similar to that of Cry3A (Yamaguchi et al., 2008). In this study, the activation process of Cry8Da in insect gut juice was closely examined. Japanese beetle gut juice proteases digested the 130 kDa Cry8Da protein to produce a 64 kDa protein. This 64 kDa protein was active against both adult and larval Japanese beetle and considered to be an activated toxin. N-terminal sequencing of this 64 kDa protein revealed that the Cry8Da leader sequence consisting of 63 amino acid residues from M¹ to F⁶³ was removed. As in the case of Cry3Aa, the proteases further digested the 64 kDa protein to two 8 kDa and 54 kDa fragments. N-terminal amino acid analysis of these smaller fragments indicated that the proteases digested the loop between Alpha Helix (Alpha for short) 3 and Alpha 4. This means that the 8 kDa fragment consists of Alpha 1-3 of Domain I and that the 54 kDa fragment contains the remaining Domain I and full Domain II and Domain III. Size exclusion chromatography and anion exchange chromatography could not separate these 64, 54 and 8 kDa proteins suggesting that the 54 kDa and 8 kDa fragments are still forming the toxin complex equivalent to the 64 kDa protein by size and ionic charge. The sequencing and chromatography results suggest that the gut juice proteases merely nicked the loop between Alpha 3 and Alpha 4. This nicking process appeared to be essential for receptor binding of the Cry8Da toxin. BBMV binding assay revealed that the Cry8Da toxin bound to BBMV preparations from both adult and larval Japanese beetle only after the loop was nicked. Only the 54 kDa fragment bound to the BBMV preparations but not the 64 kDa protein. Ligand blot showed that the protease activated Cry8Da toxin, presumably the 54 kDa fragment, bound to specific BBMV proteins, one or more of those would be receptor(s). The sizes and binding affinities of these Cry8Da-bound proteins of Japanese beetle BBMV differed between larvae and adults.     

Isoleucine at position 150 of Cyt2Aa toxin from Bacillus thuringiensis plays an important role during membrane binding and oligomerization

Cyt2Aa2 is a mosquito larvicidal and cytolytic toxin produced by Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. darmstadiensis. The toxin becomes inactive when isoleucine at position 150 was replaced by alanine. To investigate the functional role of this position, Ile150 was substituted with Leu, Phe, Glu and Lys. All mutant proteins were produced at high level, solubilized in carbonate buffer and yielded protease activated product similar to those of the wild type. Intrinsic fluorescence spectra analysis suggested that these mutants retain similar folding to the wild type. However, mosquito larvicidal and hemolytic activities dramatically decreased for the I150K and were completely abolished for I150A and I150F mutants. Membrane binding and oligomerization assays demonstrated that only I150E and I150L could bind and form oligomers on lipid membrane similar to that of the wild type. Our results suggest that amino acid at position 150 plays an important role during membrane binding and oligomerization of Cyt2Aa2 toxin. [BMB Reports 2013; 46(3): 175-180]     

Investigation of the steps involved in the difference of susceptibility of Ephestia kuehniella and Spodoptera littoralis to the Bacillus thuringiensis Vip3Aa16 toxin

BUPM95 is a Bacillusthuringiensis subsp. kurstaki strain producing the Vip3Aa16 toxin with an interesting insecticidal activity against the Lepidopteran larvae Ephestia kuehniella. Study of different steps in the mode of action of this Vegetative Insecticidal Protein on the Mediterranean flour moth (E. kuehniella) was carried out in the aim to investigate the origin of the higher susceptibility of this insect to Vip3Aa16 toxin compared to that of the Egyptian cotton leaf worm Spodoptera littoralis. Using E. kuehniella gut juice, protoxin proteolysis generated a major band corresponding to the active toxin and another band of about 22 kDa, whereas the activation of Vip3Aa16 by S. littoralis gut juice proteases generated less amount of the 62 kDa active form and three other proteolysis products. As demonstrated by zymogram analysis, the difference in proteolysis products was due to the variability of proteases in the two gut juices larvae. The study of the interaction of E. kuehniella BBMV with biotinylated Vip3Aa16 showed that this toxin bound to a putative receptor of 65 kDa compared to the 55 and 100 kDa receptors recognized in S. littoralis BBMV. The histopathological observations demonstrated similar damage caused by the toxin in the two larvae midguts. These results demonstrate that the step of activation, mainly, is at the origin of the difference of susceptibility of these two larvae towards B. thuringiensis Vip3Aa16 toxin.