Long-term predictable nipple projection following reconstruction.

The creation of the nipple-areola complex is often the final step in the surgical treatment of breast cancer patients, and it consequently has important symbolic and aesthetic implications. Patient expectations and the need for symmetry make nipple projection a crucial aesthetic determinant of nipple reconstruction. We hypothesize that long-term nipple projection and shape can be achieved in a predictable fashion using the modified star dermal fat flap technique. Prospectively, 93 nipples were reconstructed by a single surgeon using a modified star dermal fat flap technique in 44 implant and 49 TRAM flap breast reconstructions. Flap dimensions (base diameter and flap length) were designed according to patient desire or to the base diameter and projection of the opposite breast nipple. A standardized, 3-month postoperative care regimen was observed in all patients. Nipple projection was assessed by the same observer at each follow-up examination. The average length of follow-up was 730 days (745 for TRAM reconstructions and 713 for implants). Consistently, an average of 41 percent of the intraoperative projection remained intact in both groups at final evaluation (SD 12 percent). The total flap length was strongly predictive of intraoperative and long-term projection (r = 0.64 and 0.86, p < 0.0001). Flap lengths ranged from 5.5 to 9.0 cm, and in a linear correlation, resulted in intraoperative projection of 1.0 to 2.1 cm, respectively, and long-term projection of 0.4 to 0.83 cm, respectively. Based on the linear relationship, every 1-cm increase in flap length could be expected to result in a 0.16-cm increase in projection. When controlled for flap length and intraoperative projection, there was no difference between TRAM and implant nipple reconstruction in predicting postoperative nipple projection. Intraoperative planning and execution are critical to achieve predictable nipple shape, size, and projection. The dimensions of the star dermal fat flap can be strategically modified to allow the surgeon predictable projection with a consistent 41-percent preservation of intraoperative nipple projection in both TRAM and implant patients at 2 years.     

Assessment of long-term nipple projection: a comparison of three techniques

Nipple-areola reconstruction represents the final stage of breast reconstruction, whereby a reconstructed breast mound is transformed into a breast facsimile that more closely resembles the original breast. Although numerous nipple reconstruction techniques are available, all have been plagued by eventual loss of long-term projection. In this report, the authors present a comparative assessment of nipple and areola projection after reconstruction using either a bell flap, a modified star flap, or a skate flap and full-thickness skin graft for areola reconstruction. The specific technique for nipple-areola reconstruction following breast reconstruction was selected on the basis of the projection of the contralateral nipple and whether or not the opposite areola showed projection. Patients with 5 mm or less of opposite nipple projection were treated with either the bell flap or the modified star flap. In patients where the areola complex exhibited significant projection, a bell flap was chosen over the modified star flap. In those patients with greater than 5-mm nipple projection, reconstruction with a skate flap and full-thickness skin graft was performed. Maintenance of nipple projection in each of these groups was then carefully assessed over a 1-year period of follow-up using caliper measurements of nipple and areola projection obtained at 3-month intervals. The best long-term nipple projection was obtained and maintained by the skate and star techniques. The major decrease in projection of the reconstructed nipple occurred during the first 3 months. After 6 months, the projection was stable. The loss of both nipple and areola projection when using the bell flap was so remarkable that the authors would discourage the use of this procedure in virtually all patients.     

Autologous fat graft in nipple reconstruction

Reconstruction of the nipple is the penultimate step in breast reconstruction after mastectomy. A number of reconstructive techniques have been described for nipple reconstruction including skin grafts, composite grafts, and various local flaps. The authors' preferred reconstructive technique is the local C-V or modified star flap. This flap produces an excellent reconstruction, but it is dependent on underlying subcutaneous fat to provide bulk to the reconstructed nipple. In most instances, the subcutaneous tissue is adequate. However, under certain circumstances, the subcutaneous fat may be insufficient to produce a nipple of adequate projection. Two cases of bilateral nipple reconstruction after soft-tissue expansion and implant placement and subsequent nipple reconstruction with local flaps provided inadequate nipple projection. These instances, as well as a retrospective review of reconstructed nipples after mound restoration using a variety of techniques, led the authors to conclude that a more predictable alternative to sustain nipple projection was necessary. The authors identified two broad categories of breast reconstruction patients in whom this new technique would be beneficial. In the first category of patients, breast mounds are reconstructed with tissue expansion and implant insertion, and in the second category, breast mounds are reconstructed by any technique in which the nipple reconstruction subsequently flattens. This article describes the indications, techniques, and experience in 13 patients treated over a 10-month period with fat grafting for nipple reconstruction.     

Reconstruction and/or salvage of nipple projection

A simple method of creating nipple projection in flattened nipple-areola complexes is presented. The results required, on average, 14 months of follow-up, with very good projection and general appearance in all patients. This technique eliminates the unnecessary surgical gymnastics of other methods when obtaining nipple projection.     

The psychological contribution of nipple addition in breast reconstruction

Two groups of consecutive patients from two different plastic surgical practice populations were evaluated to determine psychosocial differences between those who underwent nipple-areola reconstruction in addition to breast reconstruction (N = 33) versus those who did not undergo nipple-areola reconstruction in addition to breast reconstruction (N = 26). Psychological assessment consisted of a standardized symptom inventory (Brief Symptom Inventory) and a specially designed self-report questionnaire investigating reactions unique to surgeries for breast cancer and breast reconstruction. Both groups were equivalent sociodemographically, with the exception of age, where the nipple-added group was significantly younger (P = 0.035) than the nipple-not-added group. The nipple-added group reported significantly greater satisfaction with breast reconstruction with regard to overall satisfaction (P = 0.004), satisfaction with size (P = 0.02), satisfaction with softness (P = 0.0004), sexual sensitivity (P = 0.006), and satisfaction with nude appearance (P = 0.02). Of the nine scales of clinical symptomatology on the Brief Symptom Inventory, the nipple-added group showed more increased symptoms on seven of the nine. The nipple-added group was significantly higher on two of these scales, namely, paranoid ideation (P = 0.009) and anxiety (P = 0.03).     

Reduction of adhesions with composite AlloDerm/polypropylene mesh implants for abdominal wall reconstruction

Ventral hernia repair often includes the use of structural prosthetic materials, such as polypropylene mesh, that can induce dense abdominal adhesions to peritoneal structures. AlloDerm (LifeCell Corp., Branchburg, N.J.), a commercially available decellularized human dermal analogue with its native basement membrane components intact, is gradually revascularized and replaced with autologous tissue after implantation. The authors hypothesized that AlloDerm integrated with polypropylene mesh would reduce adhesions and provide a biodegradable scaffold to generate an autologous vascularized tissue layer separating the abdominal viscera from the mesh. Ventral hernia defects (3 x 1 cm) in 19 guinea pigs were repaired using an inlay technique with polypropylene mesh alone (n = 6) or with composite implants constructed by integrating polypropylene mesh and AlloDerm with its basement membrane surface oriented toward (polypropylene/AlloIn, n = 7) or away from (polypropylene/ AlloOut, n = 6) the peritoneal cavity. At 4 weeks, the authors determined the amount of mesh implant surface area covered by adhesions, the strength of the adhesions [graded from 0 (none) to 3], and the incidence of bowel adhesions. Histologic analyses were performed on full-thickness tissue sections from the repair sites. The mean surface areas affected by adhesions and mean adhesion strength were significantly lower in the polypropylene/AlloIn (area, 12.4 percent; mean grade, 1.0) and polypropylene/AlloOut (area, 9.5 percent; mean grade, 0.5) groups than in the polypropylene group (area, 79.5 percent; mean grade, 2.9); there were no such differences between the polypropylene/AlloIn and polypropylene/AlloOut groups. The bowel was adherent to 67 percent of polypropylene repairs and 0 percent of the composite mesh repairs. The AlloDerm was remodeled to form a vascularized tissue layer beneath the mesh in composite repairs, unlike the significantly thinner, dense scar layer that formed in the polypropylene repairs. Immunohistochemical labeling for factor VIII showed neovascularization throughout the AlloDerm.The AlloDerm thus functioned as a biodegradable tissue scaffold, guiding the formation of a thick, well-vascularized tissue layer separating the polypropylene mesh from intraperitoneal structures. This significantly reduced both the amount of surface area covered by adhesions and adhesion strength. Basement membrane orientation had no effect. Composite mesh implants composed of structural prosthetic materials integrated with AlloDerm may have useful clinical applications for abdominal wall reconstruction by reducing adhesions and providing a vascularized tissue layer to separate and protect the peritoneal structures from polypropylene mesh fibers.