Comparative efficacy of VIP and analogs on activation and internalization of the recombinant VPAC2 receptor expressed in CHO cells

Using a monoclonal antibody interacting with the extracellular amino-terminus of the human VPAC₂ receptor but that did not interfere with ligand binding, we measured by flow cytometry receptor internalization and trafficking induced by full agonists, partial agonists and an antagonist in Chinese hamster ovary cells expressing the recombinant receptor. The agonists, but not the antagonist, induced a rapid, dose-dependent receptor internalization blocked by hypertonic sucrose that was more pronounced for the VIP analog N-hexanoyl-VIP (80%) than for VIP and Ro 25-1553 (50%) and the [A¹¹]-VIP (20%). Re-expression of the receptors at the membrane was achieved within two hours after exposure to VIP and Ro 25-1553 was blocked by 25 μM monensin but not by 10 μg/ml cycloheximide. Re-expression was much slower after exposure to the acylated peptide and was blocked by preincubation with 25 μM monensin and 10 μg/ml cycloheximide.     

Characterization of functional VIP/PACAP receptors in the human erythroleukemic HEL cell line

R. LEMA-KISOKA, N. HAYEZ, I. LANGER, P. ROBBERECHT, E. SARIBAN AND C. DELPORTE. Characterization of functional VIP/PACAP receptors in the human erythroleukemic HEL cell line. PEPTIDES. The presence of VIP/PACAP receptors was investigated on the human erythroleukemic cell line HEL. Specific binding of [¹²⁵I]-PACAP or [¹²⁵I]-VIP on HEL cells or membranes was very low and did not allow to perform competition curves. At 37°C PACAP transiently increased cAMP levels in the presence of the non-specific phosphodiesterase inhibitor IBMX, suggesting rapid desensitization. Kinetic studies revealed that optimal conditions to measure the EC₅₀ of PACAP(1–27) were 10 min at 20°C. Under those conditions, PACAP-related peptides increased cAMP levels with EC₅₀ in agreement with the pharmacological profile of the VPAC₁ receptor subtype: PACAP = VIP > [K¹⁵, R^16, L²⁷]VIP(1–7)/GRF(8–27) = [R¹⁶]ChSn (two VPAC₁ agonists) HELODERMIN = secretin. RO 25–1553, a selective activator of VPAC₂ receptor was inactive at 1 μM. Dose-response curves of VPAC₁ agonist molecules (PACAP, VIP, [K¹⁵, R¹⁶, L²⁷]VIP(1–7)/GRF(8–27), [R¹⁶]ChSn) were shifted to the right by the VPAC₁ receptor antagonist [AcHis¹, D-Phe², Lys¹⁵, Leu¹⁷]VIP(3–7)/GRF(8–27), with a K_i of 3 ± 1 nM (n = 3). The presence of VPAC₁ receptor mRNA was confirmed by RT-PCR. Preincubation with PACAP or PMA showed that VPAC₁ receptors underwent homologous and heterologous desensitization.

This study provides the first evidence for the expression of functional VPAC₁ receptors undergoing rapid desensitization in HEL cells.     

A highly conserved tryptophan residue in the fourth transmembrane domain of the A1 adenosine receptor is essential for ligand binding but not receptor homodimerization

Dimerization between G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) is a clearly established phenomenon. However, limited information is currently available on the interface essential for this process. Based on structural comparisons and sequence homology between rhodopsin and A₁ adenosine receptor (A₁R), we initially hypothesized that four residues in transmembrane (TM) 4 and TM5 are involved in A₁R homodimerization. Accordingly, these residues were substituted with Ala by site-directed mutagenesis. Interestingly, the mutant protein displayed no significant decrease in homodimer formation compared with wild-type A₁R, as evident from coimmunoprecipitation and BRET² analyses (improved bioluminescence resonance energy transfer system offered by Perkin-Elmer Life Sciences), but lost ligand binding activity almost completely. Further studies disclosed that this effect was derived from the mutation of one particular residue, Trp132, which is highly conserved among many GPCRs. Confocal immunofluorescence and cell-surface biotinylation studies revealed that the mutant receptors localized normally at transfected cell membranes, signifying that loss of ligand binding was not because of defective cellular trafficking. Molecular modeling of the A₁R-ligand complex disclosed that Trp132 interacted with several residues located in TM3 and TM5 that stabilized agonist binding. Thus, loss of interactions of Trp with these residues may, in turn, disrupt binding to agonists. Our study provides strong evidence of the essential role of the highly conserved Trp132 in TM4 of adenosine receptors.     

Mutation of the phosphorylatable residue Thr429 in Glu of the human VPAC1 led to a constitutively desensitized receptor

The hVPAC1 receptor is rapidly phosphorylated and internalized by agonists but not re-expressed at the membrane after washing. Mutation of Ser/Thr residues in the C-terminus reduced phosphorylation but not internalization that was abolished only when all the phosphorylatable residues were mutated. Substitution of Thr429 by Glu mimicking a phosphothreonin led to a mutant with unchanged binding properties, decreased coupling to adenylate cyclase consisting in a reduced VIP potency, increased basal and VIP stimulated phosphorylation, preserved internalization followed by a rapid receptor re-expression. These are the expected characteristics of a constitutively desensitized receptor, putting forward the role of Thr429 phosphorylation in that process.     

Cross-regulation of VPAC2 receptor internalization by m2 receptors via c-Src-mediated phosphorylation of GRK2

The aim of the study was to examine the mechanisms by which ACh, acting via m2 receptors, regulates GRK2-mediated VPAC(2) receptor desensitization in gastric smooth muscle cells. VIP induced VPAC(2) receptor phosphorylation and internalization in freshly dispersed smooth muscle cells. Co-stimulation with acetylcholine (ACh), in the presence of m3 receptor antagonist, 4-DAMP, augmented VPAC(2) receptor phosphorylation and internalization. The m2 receptor antagonist methoctramine or the c-Src inhibitor PP2 blocked the effect of ACh, suggesting that the augmentation was mediated by c-Src, derived from m2 receptor activation. ACh induced activation of c-Src and phosphorylation of GRK2 and the effects of ACh were blocked by methoctramine, PP2, or by uncoupling of m2 receptors from G(i3) with pertussis toxin. In conclusion, we identified a novel mechanism of cross-regulation of GRK2-mediated phosphorylation and internalization of G(s)-coupled VPAC(2) receptors by G(i)-coupled m2 receptors via tyrosine phosphorylation of GRK2 and stimulation of GRK2 activity.     

Contribution of the carboxyl terminus of the VPAC1 receptor to agonist-induced receptor phosphorylation, internalization, and recycling

When exposed to vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP), the human wild type VPAC1 receptor expressed in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells is rapidly phosphorylated, desensitized, and internalized in the endosomal compartment and is not re-expressed at the cell membrane within 2 h after agonist removal. The aims of the present work were first to correlate receptor phosphorylation level to internalization and recycling, measured by flow cytometry and in some cases by confocal microscopy using a monoclonal antibody that did not interfere with ligand binding, and second to identify the phosphorylated Ser/Thr residues. Combining receptor mutations and truncations allowed identification of Ser250 (in the second intracellular loop), Thr429, Ser435, Ser448 or Ser449, and Ser455 (all in the distal part of the C terminus) as candidates for VIP-stimulated phosphorylation. The effects of single mutations were not additive, suggesting alternative phosphorylation sites in mutated receptors. Replacement of all of the Ser/Thr residues in the carboxyl-terminal tail and truncation of the domain containing these residues completely inhibited VIP-stimulated phosphorylation and receptor internalization. There was, however, no direct correlation between receptor phosphorylation and internalization; in some truncated and mutated receptors, a 70% reduction in phosphorylation had little effect on internalization. In contrast to results obtained on the wild type and all of the mutated or truncated receptors that still underwent phosphorylation, internalization of the severely truncated receptor was reversed within 2 h of incubation in the absence of the agonist. Receptor recovery was blocked by monensin, an endosome inhibitor.     

G Protein independent phosphorylation and internalization of the δ-opioid receptor

Agonist activation of the δ-opioid receptor leads to internalization via Gβγ recruitment of G protein coupled receptor kinase-2, which phosphorylates the receptor at several sites, including Ser363, allowing β-arrestin binding and localization to clathrin coated pits. Using human embryonic kidney cells expressing a δ-opioid receptor we tested the hypothesis that prevention of receptor coupling to G protein by treatment with pertussis toxin (PTX) will block these processes. PTX treatment did not reduce phosphorylation of δ-opioid receptor Ser363 in response to the agonist [ d -Pen2, d -Pen5]enkephalin, or recruitment of β-arrestin 2-green fluorescent protein to the membrane and only slowed, but did not prevent, [ d -Pen2, d -Pen5]enkephalin-induced internalization. Similarly, PTX treatment only partially prevented the ability of the δ-opioid peptide agonists deltorphin II and [Met5]enkephalin and the non-peptide agonist BW373U86 to induce receptor internalization. No internalization was seen with morphine, oxymorphindole or the putative δ₁-opioid agonist TAN-67 in the presence or absence of PTX, even though TAN-67 showed a strong activation of G protein, as measured by guanosine-5'-O-(3-[³⁵S]thio)triphosphate binding. The ability of an agonist to stimulate phosphorylation at Ser363 was predictive of its capacity to induce internalization. The results suggest a role for G protein in δ-opioid receptor internalization, but show that alternative G protein independent pathways exist.     

Arrestin binding to the G protein-coupled N-formyl peptide receptor is regulated by the conserved "DRY" sequence

Following activation by ligand, the N-formyl peptide receptor (FPR) undergoes processing events initiated by phosphorylation that lead to receptor desensitization and internalization. Our previous results have shown that FPR internalization can occur in the absence of receptor desensitization, suggesting that FPR desensitization and internalization are controlled by distinct mechanisms. More recently, we have provided evidence that internalization of the FPR occurs via a mechanism that is independent of the actions of arrestin, dynamin, and clathrin. In the present report, we demonstrate that stimulation of the FPR with agonist leads to a significant translocation of arrestin-2 from the cytosol to the membrane. Fluorescence microscopy revealed that the translocated arrestin-2 is highly colocalized with the ligand-bound FPR. A D71A mutant FPR, which does not undergo activation or phosphorylation in response to ligand, did not colocalize with arrestin-2. Surprisingly, an R123G mutant FPR, which does not bind G protein but does become phosphorylated and subsequently internalized, also did not bind arrestin. These results indicate that arrestin binding is not required for FPR internalization and demonstrate for the first time that a common motif, the conserved "DRY" domain of G protein-coupled receptors, is essential for phosphorylation-dependent arrestin binding, as well as G protein activation.     

Development of High Affinity Selective VIP1 Receptor Agonists

Gourlet, P., A. Vandermeers, P. Vertongen, J. Rathe, P. De Neef, J. Cnudde, M. Waelbroeck and P. Robberecht. Development of high affinity selective VIP₁ receptor agonists. Peptides 18(10) 1539–1545, 1997.—The biological effects of VIP are mediated by at least two VIP receptors: the VIP₁ and the VIP₂ receptors that were cloned in rat, human and mice. As the mRNA coding for each receptor are located in different tissues, it is likely that each receptor modulates different functions. It is therefore of interest to obtain selective agonists for each receptor subtype. In the present work, we achieved the synthesis of two VIP₁ receptor selective agonists derived from secretin and GRF. [R¹⁶]chicken secretin had IC₅₀ values of binding of 1, 10,000, 20, and 3000 nM for the rat VIP₁-, VIP₂-, secretin- and PACAP receptors, respectively. This peptide, however, had a weaker affinity for the human VIP₁ receptor (IC₅₀ of 60 nM). The chimeric, substituted peptide [K¹⁵,R¹⁶,L²⁷]VIP(1-7)/GRF(8-27) had IC₅₀ values of binding of 1, 10,000, 10,000 and 30,000 nM for the rat VIP₁-, VIP₂-, secretin- and PACAP receptors, respectively. Furthermore, its also showed an IC₅₀ of 0.8 nM for the human VIP₁ receptor and a low affinity for the human VIP₂ receptor. It is unlikely that this GRF analogue interacted with a high affinity to the pituitary GRF receptors as it did not stimulate rat pituitary adenylate cyclase activity. The two described analogues stimulated maximally the adenylate cyclase activity on membranes expressing each receptor subtype.     

Retinoic acid down-regulates VPAC(1) receptors and TGF-beta 3 but up-regulates TGF-beta 2 in lung cancer cells

The effects of retinoic acid (RA) on lung cancer cells were investigated. Both all-trans (t-RA) and 13-cis RA (c-RA) decreased specific ¹²⁵I-VIP binding to NCI-H1299 cells in a time- and concentration-dependent manner. After 20 hr, 30 μM t-RA decreased specific ¹²⁵I-VIP binding by 60%. By Scatchard analysis, the density of VIP binding sites but not the affinity was reduced by 42%. NCI-H1299 VPAC₁ receptor mRNA was reduced by 48%. VIP caused a 3-fold elevation in the NCI-H1299 cAMP, and the increase in cAMP caused by VIP was reduced by 38% if the NCI-H1299 cells were treated with t-RA. Using the MTT assay, 3 μM t-RA and 3 μM c-RA inhibited NCI-H1299 proliferation by 60 and 23% respectively. Also, transforming growth factor (TGF)-β2 increased after treatment of NCI-H1299 cells with t-RA whereas TGF-β1 mRNA was unaffected and TGF-β3 mRNA was decreased. These results suggest that RA may inhibit lung cancer growth by down-regulating VPAC₁ receptor and TGF-β3 mRNA but up-regulating TGF-β2 mRNA.     

Post-endocytic fates of delta-opioid receptor are regulated by GRK2-mediated receptor phosphorylation and distinct beta-arrestin isoforms

Once internalized, some G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) can recycle back to the cell surface, while some of them are delivered to lysosomes for degradation. Because recycling and degradation represent two opposing receptor fates, understanding the mechanisms that determine post-endocytic fate of GPCRs is of great importance. Our recent work has verified that agonist-induced internalization of delta-opioid receptor (DOR) employs both phosphorylation-dependent and -independent mechanisms in HEK293 cells. To investigate whether these two internalization mechanisms work differently in receptor regulation, we monitored receptor post-endocytic fates using flow cytometry, surface receptor biotinylation and radioligand binding assays. Results showed that the internalized wild type DOR could either recycle to the cell surface or be degraded. Mutant DOR M4/5/6, which lacks all three G protein-coupled receptor kinase 2 (GRK2) phosphorylation sites, could also internalize upon agonist challenge although in a reduced level as compared with the wild type counterpart. However, the internalized mutant DOR could not recycle back to the cell surface and all mutant DOR was degraded after internalization. Inhibition of GRK2 expression by GRK2 RNAi also strongly attenuated recycling of DOR. Furthermore, overexpression of GRK2, which significantly increased receptor phosphorylation and internalization, also targeted more internalized receptors to the recycling pathway. These data suggest that GRK2-catalyzed receptor phosphorylation is critically involved in DOR internalization and recycling, and the phosphorylation-independent internalization leads to receptor degradation. Data obtained from beta-arrestin1 and beta-arrestin2 RNAi experiments indicated that both beta-arrestin1 and beta-arrestin2 participate in phosphorylation-dependent internalization and the subsequent recycling of DOR. However, phosphorylation-independent internalization and degradation of DOR were strongly blocked by beta-arrestin2 RNAi, but not beta-arrestin1 RNAi. Taken together, these data demonstrate for the first time that GRK2 phosphorylation-dependent internalization mediated by both beta-arrestin1 and beta-arrestin2 leads DOR to recycle, whereas GRK2-independent internalization mediated by beta-arrestin2 alone leads to receptor degradation. Thus, the post-endocytic fate of internalized DOR can be regulated by GRK2-catalyzed receptor phosphorylation as well as distinct beta-arrestin isoforms.     

Regulation of CB1 cannabinoid receptor internalization by a promiscuous phosphorylation-dependent mechanism

Agonists stimulate cannabinoid 1 receptor (CB₁R) internalization. Previous work suggests that the extreme carboxy-terminus of the receptor regulates this internalization – likely through the phosphorylation of serines and threonines clustered within this region. While truncation of the carboxy-terminus (V460Z CB₁) and consequent removal of these putative phosphorylation sites prevents endocytosis in AtT20 cells, the residues necessary for CB₁R internalization remain elusive. To determine the structural requirements for internalization, we evaluated endocytosis of carboxy-terminal mutant CB₁Rs stably expressed in HEK293 cells. In contrast to AtT20 cells, V460Z CB₁R expressed in HEK293 cells internalized to the same extent and with similar kinetics as the wild-type receptor. However, mutation of serine and/or threonine residues within the extreme carboxy-terminal attenuated internalization when these receptors were expressed in HEK293 cells. These results establish that the extreme carboxy-terminal phosphorylation sites are not required for internalization of truncated receptors, but are required for internalization of full-length receptors in HEK293 cells. Analysis of β-arrestin-2 recruitment to mutant CB₁R suggests that putative carboxy-terminal phosphorylation sites mediate β-arrestin-2 translocation. This study indicates that the local cellular environment affects the structural determinants of CB₁R internalization. Additionally, phosphorylation likely regulates the internalization of (full-length) CB₁Rs.     

A Single Amino Acid Difference Accounts for the Pharmacological Distinctions Between the Rat and Human 5-Hydroxytryptamine1B Receptors

Abstract: Molecular cloning of the rat and human 5-hydroxytryptamine_1B (5-HT_1B) receptors has revealed that the primary amino acid sequence of these two receptors is >90% identical. Despite this high degree of primary sequence homology, these two receptors have significantly different pharmacological properties. A mutant human 5-HT_1B receptor was constructed in which Thr³⁵⁵ was replaced by Asn, the corresponding residue at this position in the rat 5-HT_1B receptor. The pharmacology of the mutant human 5-HT_1B receptor was very similar to that of the rat 5-HT_1B receptor. Specifically, the mutant receptor had much higher affinity for pindolol, [¹²⁵I]-iodocyanopindolol, propranolol, and CP-93,129 than the wild-type receptor. In contrast, the mutant had significantly lower affinity for sumatriptan, N,N -dipropyl-5-carboxamidotryptamine, 5-methoxy- N,N -dimethyltryptamine, methysergide, metergoline, and rauwolscine. These data suggest that a single amino acid difference at position 355 is responsible for the pharmacological differences between the rat and human 5-HT_1B receptors.     

Different kinases desensitize the human delta-opioid receptor (hDOP-R) in the neuroblastoma cell line SK-N-BE upon peptidic and alkaloid agonists

In a previous work, we described a differential desensitization of the human δ-opioid receptor (hDOP-R) by etorphine (a non-selective and alkaloid agonist) and δ-selective and peptidic agonists (DPDPE ([d-Pen^2,5]enkephalin) and deltorphin I (Tyr-d-Ala-Phe-Asp-Val-Val-Gly-NH₂)) in the neuroblastoma cell line SK-N-BE (Allouche et al., Eur. J. Pharmacol., 371, 235, 1999). In the present study, we explored the putative role of different kinases in this differential regulation.

First, selective chemical inhibitors of PKA, PKC and tyrosine kinases were used and we showed a significant reduction of etorphine-induced opioid receptor desensitization by the bisindolylmaleimide I (PKC inhibitor) while genistein (tyrosine kinase inhibitor) was potent to impair desensitization induced by the different agonists. When the PKA was inhibited by H89 pretreatment, no modification of opioid receptor desensitization was observed whatever the agonist used.

Second, we further studied the role of G protein-coupled receptor kinases (GRKs) and by using western-blot experiments we observed that only the GRK2 isoform was expressed in the SK-N-BE cells. Next, the neuroblastoma cells were transfected with the wild type GRK2 or its dominant negative mutant GRK2-K220R and the inhibition on cAMP level was determined in naïve and agonist-pretreated cells. We showed that over-expression of GRK2-K220R totally abolished etorphine-induced receptor desensitization while no effect was observed with peptidic agonists and over-expression of GRK2 selectively impaired cAMP inhibition promoted by etorphine suggesting that this kinase was involved in the regulation of hDOP-R activated only by etorphine.

Third, correlation between functional experiments and phosphorylation of the hDOP-R after agonist activation was assessed by western-blot using the specific anti-phospho-DOP-R Ser³⁶³ antibody. While all agonists were potent to increase phosphorylation of opioid receptor, we showed no impairment of receptor phosphorylation level after PKC inhibitor pretreatment. Upon agonist activation, no enhancement of receptor phosphorylation was observed when the GRK2 was over-expressed while the GRK2-K220R partially reduced the hDOP-R Ser³⁶³ phosphorylation only after peptidic agonists pretreatment.

In conclusion, hDOP-R desensitization upon etorphine exposure relies on the GRK2, PKC and tyrosine kinases while DPDPE and deltorphin I mediate desensitization at least via tyrosine kinases. Although the Ser³⁶³ was described as the primary phosphorylation site of the mouse DOP-R, we observed no correlation between desensitization and phosphorylation of this amino acid.     

Multiple activation steps of the N-formyl peptide receptor

The human N-formyl peptide receptor (FPR) is representative of a growing family of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCR) that respond to chemokines and chemoattractants. Despite the importance of this receptor class to immune function, relatively little is known about the molecular mechanisms involved in their activation. To reveal steps required for the activation of GPCR receptors, we utilized mutants of the FPR which have previously been shown to be incapable of binding and activating G proteins. For this study, the FPR mutants were expressed in human myeloid U937 cells and characterized for functions in addition to G protein coupling, such as receptor phosphorylation and ligand-induced receptor internalization. The results demonstrated that one of the mutants, R123G, though being unable to activate G protein, was capable of undergoing ligand-induced phosphorylation as well as internalization. Receptor internalization was monitored by following the fate of the ligand as well as by directly monitoring the fate of the receptor. The results with the R123G mutant were in contrast to those obtained for mutants D71A and R309G/E310A/R311G which, though being expressed at the cell surface and binding ligand, were incapable of being phosphorylated or internalized upon agonist stimulation. These results suggest that following ligand binding at least two "steps" are required for full activation of the wild-type FPR. That these observations may be of more general importance in GPCR-mediated signaling is suggested by the highly conserved nature of the mutants studied: D71, R123, and the site represented by amino acids 309-311 are very highly conserved throughout the entire superfamily of G protein-coupled receptors. Models of receptor activation based on the observed results are discussed.     

Roles of phosphorylation-dependent and -independent mechanisms in the regulation of histamine H2 receptor by G protein-coupled receptor kinase 2

It is widely assumed that G protein-coupled receptor kinase 2 (GRK2)-mediated specific inhibition of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) response involves GRK-mediated receptor phosphorylation followed by β-arrestin binding and subsequent uncoupling from the heterotrimeric G protein. It has recently become evident that GRK2-mediated GPCRs regulation also involves phosphorylation-independent mechanisms. In the present study we investigated whether the histamine H2 receptor (H2R), a Gα(s)-coupled GPCR known to be desensitized by GRK2, needs to be phosphorylated for its desensitization and/or internalization and resensitization. For this purpose we evaluated the effect of the phosphorylating-deficient GRK2K220R mutant on H2R signaling in U937, COS7, and HEK293T cells. We found that although this mutant functioned as dominant negative concerning receptor internalization and resensitization, it desensitized H2R signaling in the same degree as the GRK2 wild type. To identify the domains responsible for the kinase-independent receptor desensitization, we co-transfected the receptor with constructions encoding the GRK2 RGS-homology domain (RH) and the RH or the kinase domain fused to the pleckstrin-homology domain. Results demonstrated that the RH domain of GRK2 was sufficient to desensitize the H2R. Moreover, disruption of RGS functions by the use of GRK2D110A/K220R double mutant, although coimmunoprecipitating with the H2R, reversed GRK2K220R-mediated H2R desensitization. Overall, these results indicate that GRK2 induces desensitization of H2R through a phosphorylation-independent and RGS-dependent mechanism and extends the GRK2 RH domain-mediated regulation of GPCRs beyond Gα(q)-coupled receptors. On the other hand, GRK2 kinase activity proved to be necessary for receptor internalization and the resulting resensitization.     

Identification of distinct c-terminal domains of the Bombyx adipokinetic hormone receptor that are essential for receptor export, phosphorylation and internalization

Neuropeptides of the adipokinetic hormone (AKH) family play important roles in insect hemolymph sugar homeostasis, larval lipolysis and storage-fat mobilization. Our previous studies have shown that the adipokinetic hormone receptor (AKHR), a Gs-coupled receptor, induces intracellular cAMP accumulation, calcium mobilization and ERK1/2 phosphorylation upon agonist stimulation. However, the underlying molecular mechanisms that regulate the internalization and desensitization of AKHR remain largely unknown. In the current study we made a construct to express AKHR fused with enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP) at its C-terminal end to further characterize AKHR internalization. In stable AKHR-EGFP-expressing HEK-293 cells, AKHR-EGFP was mainly localized at the plasma membrane and was rapidly internalized in a dose- and time-dependent manner via the clathrin-coated pit pathway upon agonist stimulation, and internalized receptors were slowly recovered to the cell surface after the removal of AKH peptides. The results derived from RNA interference and arrestin translocation demonstrated that G protein-coupled receptor kinase 2 and 5 (GRK2/5) and β-arrestin2 were involved in receptor phosphorylation and internalization. Furthermore, experiments using deletion and site-directed mutagenesis strategies identified the three residues (Thr356, Ser359 and Thr362) responsible for GRK-mediated phosphorylation and internalization and the C-terminal domain from residue-322 to residue-342 responsible for receptor export from ER. This is the first detailed investigation of the internalization and trafficking of insect G protein-coupled receptors.     

Phosphorylation of GRK2 by PKA augments GRK2-mediated phosphorylation, internalization, and desensitization of VPAC2 receptors in smooth muscle

The smooth muscle of the gut expresses mainly G(s) protein-coupled vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP)/pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating peptide receptors (VPAC(2) receptors), which belong to the secretin family of G protein-coupled receptors. The extent to which PKA and G protein-coupled receptor kinases (GRKs) participate in homologous desensitization varies greatly among the secretin family of receptors. The present study identified the novel role of PKA in homologous desensitization of VPAC(2) receptors via the phosphorylation of GRK2 at Ser(685). VIP induced phosphorylation of GRK2 in a concentration-dependent fashion, and the phosphorylation was abolished by blockade of PKA with cell-permeable myristoylated protein kinase inhibitor (PKI) or in cells expressing PKA phosphorylation-site deficient GRK2(S685A). Phosphorylation of GRK2 increased its activity and binding to G betagamma. VIP-induced phosphorylation of VPAC(2) receptors was abolished in muscle cells expressing kinase-deficient GRK2(K220R) and attenuated in cells expressing GRK2(S685A) or by PKI. VPAC(2) receptor internalization (determined from residual (125)I-labeled VIP binding and receptor biotinylation after a 30-min exposure to VIP) was blocked in cells expressing GRK2(K220R) and attenuated in cells expressing GRK2(S685A) or by PKI. Finally, VPAC(2) receptor degradation (determined from residual (125)I-labeled VIP binding and receptor expression after a prolonged exposure to VIP) and functional VPAC(2) receptor desensitization (determined from the decrease in adenylyl cyclase activity and cAMP formation after a 30-min exposure to VIP) were abolished in cells expressing GRK2(K220R) and attenuated in cells expressing GRK2(S685A). These results demonstrate that in gastric smooth muscle VPAC(2) receptor phosphorylation is mediated by GRK2. Phosphorylation of GRK2 by PKA enhances GRK2 activity and its ability to induce VPAC(2) receptor phosphorylation, internalization, desensitization, and degradation.     

Investigation of the Role of Conserved Serine Residues in the Long Form of the Rat D2 Dopamine Receptor Using Site-Directed Mutagenesis

Abstract: Three serine residues (Ser¹⁹³, Ser¹⁹⁴, Ser¹⁹⁷) in the fifth transmembrane-spanning region of the D₂ dopamine receptor have been mutated separately to alanine and the effects of the mutations determined in ligand-binding experiments with [³H]spiperone. For many antagonists the mutations had little effect, showing that the overall conformation of the mutant receptors was similar to that of the native, although there were effects on the binding of certain antagonists. The effect of the mutations on agonist binding to the free receptor (uncoupled from G proteins) was determined in the presence of GTP (100 µ M ). This showed that there was no single mode of binding of catecholamine agonists to the receptor and that all three serine residues can participate in the binding of some agonists, possibly through hydrogen bonds to the catechol hydroxyl groups. Coupling of the mutant receptors to G proteins was assessed from agonist-binding curves in the absence of GTP, when higher and lower affinity agonist-binding sites were seen. Receptor/G protein coupling was generally unaffected by the Ala¹⁹³ and Ala¹⁹⁴ mutations, but the Ala¹⁹⁷ mutation eliminated receptor/G protein coupling for some agonists. These data show that the interactions of agonists with the free and coupled forms of the receptor are different.