Adiponectin Levels during Low‐ and High‐Fat Eucaloric Diets in Lean and Obese Women

Objective: Adiponectin influences insulin sensitivity (S_I) and fat oxidation. Little is known about changes in adiponectin with changes in the fat content of eucaloric diets. We hypothesized that dietary fat content may influence adiponectin according to an individual's S_I. Research Methods and Procedures: We measured changes in adiponectin, insulin, glucose, and leptin in response to high‐fat (HF) and low‐fat (LF) eucaloric diets in lean (n = 10) and obese (n = 11) subjects. Obese subjects were further subdivided in relation to a priori S_I. Results: We found significantly higher insulin, glucose, and leptin and lower adiponectin in obese vs. lean subjects during both HF and LF. The mean group values of these measurements, including adiponectin (lean, HF 21.9 ± 9.8; LF, 20.8 ± 6.6; obese, HF 10.0 ± 3.3; LF, 9.5 ± 2.3 ng/mL; mean ± SD), did not significantly change between HF and LF diets. However, within the obese group, the insulin‐sensitive subjects had significantly higher adiponectin during HF than did the insulin‐resistant subjects. Additionally, the change in adiponectin from LF to HF diet correlated positively with the obese subjects’ baseline S_I. Discussion: Although in lean and obese women, group mean values for adiponectin did not change significantly with a change in fat content of a eucaloric diet, a priori measured S_I in obese subjects predicted an increase in adiponectin during the HF diet; this may be a mechanism that preserves S_I in an already obese group.     

Insulin‐ and Exercise‐Stimulated Skeletal Muscle Blood Flow and Glucose Uptake in Obese Men

Objective: Insulin resistance in obese subjects results in the impaired use of glucose by insulin‐sensitive tissues, e.g., skeletal muscle. In the present study, we determined whether insulin resistance in obesity is associated with an impaired ability of exercise to stimulate muscle blood flow, oxygen delivery, or glucose uptake. Research Methods and Procedures: Nine obese (body mass index = 36 ± 2 kg/m²) and 11 age‐matched nonobese men (body mass index = 22 ± 1 kg/m²) performed one‐legged isometric exercise during hyperinsulinemia. Rates of femoral muscle blood flow, oxygen consumption, and glucose uptake were measured simultaneously in both legs using [¹⁵O]H₂O, [¹⁵O]O₂, [¹⁸F]fluoro‐deoxy‐glucose, and positron emission tomography. Results: The obese subjects exhibited resistance to insulin stimulation of glucose uptake in resting muscle, regardless of whether glucose uptake was expressed per kilogram of femoral muscle mass (p = 0.001) or per the total mass of quadriceps femoris muscle. At similar workloads, oxygen consumption, blood flow, and glucose uptake were lower in the obese than the nonobese subjects when expressed per kilogram of muscle, but similar when expressed per quadriceps femoris muscle mass. Discussion: We conclude that obesity is characterized by insulin resistance of glucose uptake in resting skeletal muscle regardless of how glucose uptake is expressed. When compared with nonobese individuals at similar absolute workloads and under identical hyperinsulinemic conditions, the ability of exercise to increase muscle oxygen uptake, blood flow, and glucose uptake per muscle mass is blunted in obese insulin‐resistant subjects. However, these defects are compensated for by an increase in muscle mass.     

Insulin Resistance in Nondiabetic Morbidly Obese Patients: Effect of Bariatric Surgery

Objective: To evaluate insulin action on substrate use and insulinemia in nondiabetic class III obese patients before and after weight loss induced by bariatric surgery. Research Methods and Procedures: Thirteen obese patients (four men/nine women; BMI = 56.3 ± 2.7 kg/m²) and 13 lean subjects (five men/eight women; BMI = 22.4 ± 0.5 kg/m²) underwent euglycemic clamp, oral glucose tolerance test, and indirect calorimetry. The study was carried out before (Study I) and after (～40% relative to initial body weight; Study II) weight loss induced by Roux‐en‐Y Gastric bypass with silastic ring surgery. Results: The obese patients were insulin resistant (whole‐body glucose use = 19.7 ± 1.5 vs. 51.5 ± 2.4 μmol/min per kilogram fat‐free mass, p < 0.0001) and hyperinsulinemic in the fasting state (332 ± 86 vs. 85 ± 5 pM, p < 0.0001) and during the oral glucose tolerance test compared with the lean subjects. Fasting plasma insulin normalized after weight loss, whereas whole‐body glucose use increased (35.5 ± 3.7 μmol/min per kilogram fat‐free mass, p < 0.05 vs. Study I). The higher insulin clearance of obese did not change during the follow‐up period. Insulin‐induced glucose oxidation and nonoxidative glucose disposal were lower in the obese compared with the lean group (all p < 0.05). In Study II, the former increased slightly, whereas nonoxidative glucose disposal reached values similar to those of the control group. Fasting lipid oxidation was higher in the obese than in the control group and did not change significantly in Study II. The insulin effect on lipid oxidation was slightly improved (p = 0.01 vs. Study I). Discussion: The rapid weight loss after surgery in obese class III patients normalized insulinemia and improved insulin sensitivity almost entirely due to glucose storage, whereas fasting lipid oxidation remained high.     

Hepatic Insulin Resistance in Obese Non-Diabetic Subjects and in Type 2 Diabetic Patients

Objective: Obese non-diabetic patients are characterized by an extra-hepatic insulin resistance. Whether obese patients also have decreased hepatic insulin sensitivity remains controversial. Research Methods and Procedures: To estimate their hepatic insulin sensitivity, we measured the rate of exogenous insulin infusion required to maintain mildly elevated glycemia in obese patients with type 2 diabetes, obese non-diabetic patients, and lean control subjects during constant infusions of somatostatin and physiological low-glucagon replacement infusions. To account for differences in insulin concentrations among the three groups of subjects, an additional protocol was also performed in healthy lean subjects with higher insulin infusion rates and exogenous dextrose infusion. Results: The insulin infusion rate required to maintain glycemia at 8.5 mM was increased 4-fold in obese patients with type 2 diabetes and 1.5-fold in obese non-diabetic patients. The net endogenous glucose production (measured with 6,6-²H₂-glucose) and total glucose output (measured with 2-²H₁-glucose) were ∼30% lower in the patients than in the lean subjects. Net endogenous glucose production and total glucose output were both markedly increased in both groups of obese patients compared with lean control subjects during hyperinsulinemia. Discussion: Our data indicate that both obese non-diabetic and obese type 2 diabetic patients have a blunted suppressive action of insulin on glucose production, indicating hepatic and renal insulin resistance.     

No Decrease in Free IGF‐I with Increasing Insulin in Obesity‐Related Insulin Resistance

Objective: Different facts suggest that the insulin growth factor (IGF)/ insulin growth factor‐binding protein (IGFBP) system may be regulated by factors other than growth hormone. It has been proposed that, in healthy subjects, free IGF‐I plays a role in glucose metabolism. The role of free IGF‐I in glucose homeostasis in insulin resistance is poorly understood. This study was undertaken to evaluate the effects of acute changes in plasma glucose and insulin levels on free IGF‐I and IGFBP‐1 in obese and non‐obese subjects. Research Methods and Procedures: Nineteen lean and 24 obese subjects were investigated. A frequently sampled intravenous glucose tolerance test was performed. Free IGF‐I and IGFBP‐1 were determined at 0, 19, 22, 50, 100, and 180 minutes. Results: Basal free IGF‐I levels tended to be higher and IGFBP‐1 lower in obese than in lean subjects. IGFBP‐1 levels inversely correlated with basal insulin concentration. To determine the effects of insulin on the availability of free IGF‐I and IGFBP‐1, changes in their plasma concentrations were measured during a frequently sampled intravenous glucose tolerance test. After insulin administration, a significant suppression of free IGF‐I at 22% was observed in lean subjects. In contrast, plasma‐free IGF‐I levels remained essentially unchanged in the obese group. The differences between both groups were statistically significant at 100 minutes (p < 0.01) and 180 minutes (p < 0.05). Serum IGFBP‐1 was suppressed to a similar extent in both groups. Discussion: These data suggest that the concentrations of free IGF‐I and IGFBP‐1 are differentially regulated by obesity. Obesity‐related insulin resistance leads to unsuppressed free IGF‐I levels.     

Increased Susceptibility to Insulin Resistance Associated with Abdominal Obesity in Aging Rats**

Objective: Recent data have suggested that the insulin resistance observed with aging may be more related to adiposity than aging per se. We asked whether the insulin resistance observed in aged rats was comparable (both in magnitude and location) to that of fat‐fed rats. Research Methods and Procedures: We performed hyperinsulinemic (5 mU/min per kg) euglycemic clamps with tracer in conscious, 6‐hour fasted young (YL), fat‐fed young (YF), fat‐fed old (OF), and calorically restricted old (OL) rats. Results: Intraabdominal fat measurements showed that OF and YF rats were more obese than YL (p ≤ 0.001; YF > OF > YL). Caloric restriction not only prevented age‐related obesity but also reduced the ratio of intraabdominal fat to lean body mass (LBM) compared with YL (OL: 0.59 ± 0.05 vs. YL: 1.07 ± 0.04; p = 0.017). Despite similar incremental insulin, YF and OF rats required 40% less infused glucose to maintain euglycemia than YL and OL rats (p < 0.001). Insulin‐stimulated glucose uptake (Si_Rd: ΔRd/(ΔInsulin × Glucose_SS) was impaired in OF rats (OF: 14.03 ± 1.79 vs. YL: 23.08 ± 1.87 × 10³ dL/min × kg LBM per pM; p = 0.004) and improved in OL rats (29.41 ± 1.84 × 10³ dL/min × kg LBM per pM; p = 0.031) compared with YL. Despite greater obesity, YF rats did not exhibit lower Si_Rd compared with OF rats (p = 0.58). In contrast, the ability of insulin to suppress endogenous glucose production (EGP; Si_EGP: ΔEGP/(ΔInsulin × Glucose_SS) was not impaired in OF rats (OF vs. YL; p = 0.61) but was markedly impaired in YF rats by ～75% (1.72 ± 0.66 × 10³ dL/min × kg per pM; p = 0.013). Surprisingly, separate regression analysis for old and young animals revealed that old rats exhibited a significantly steeper regression between Si (Rd and EGP) and adiposity than young rats (p < 0.05). Thus, older rats showed a proportionately greater decrement in insulin sensitivity with an equivalent increase in adiposity. Discussion: These data suggest that, in rodents, youth affords significant protection against obesity‐induced insulin resistance.     

Correlation between Serum Resistin Level and Adiposity in Obese Individuals

Objective: Resistin is associated with insulin resistance in mice and may play a similar role in humans. The aim of our study was to examine the relationship of serum resistin level to body composition, insulin resistance, and related obesity phenotypes in humans. Research Methods and Procedures: Sixty‐four young (age 32 ± 10 years), obese (BMI 32.9 ± 5.6), nondiabetic subjects taking no medication, and 15 lean (BMI 21.1 ± 1.3) volunteers were studied cross‐sectionally. Thirty‐five of the subjects were also reevaluated after 1.5 years on a weight reduction program entailing dieting and exercise; changes of serum resistin were compared with changes of BMI, body composition, fat distribution, and several indices of insulin sensitivity derived from plasma glucose and serum insulin levels measured during 75‐g oral glucose tolerance test. Results: In a cross‐sectional analysis, serum resistin was significantly higher in obese subjects than in lean volunteers (24.58 ± 12.93 ng/mL; n = 64 vs. 12.83 ± 8.30 ng/mL; n = 15; p < 0.01), and there was a correlation between resistin level and BMI, when the two groups were combined (ρ = 0.35, p < 0.01). Although cross‐sectional analysis in obese subjects revealed no correlation between serum resistin and parameters related to adiposity or insulin resistance, longitudinal analysis revealed change in serum resistin to be positively correlated with changes in BMI, body fat, fat mass, visceral fat area, and mean glucose and insulin (ρ = 0.39, 0.40, 0.44, 0.50, 0.40, and 0.50; p = 0.02, 0.03, 0.02, <0.01, 0.02, and <0.01, respectively). Discussion: Resistin appears to be related to human adiposity and to be a possible candidate factor in human insulin resistance.     

Changes in Insulin Secretion and Glucose Metabolism Induced by Dexamethasone in Lean and Obese Females

Objective: In healthy lean individuals, changes in insulin sensitivity occurring as a consequence of a 2‐day dexamethasone administration are compensated for by changes in insulin secretion, allowing glucose homeostasis to be maintained. This study evaluated the changes in glucose metabolism and insulin secretion induced by short‐term dexamethasone administration in obese women. Research Methods and Procedures: Eleven obese women with normal glucose tolerance were studied on two occasions, without and after 2 days of low‐dose dexamethasone administration. A two‐step hyperglycemic clamp (7.5 and 10 mM glucose) with 6, 6 ²H₂ glucose was used to assess insulin secretion and whole body glucose metabolism. Results were compared with those obtained in a group of eight lean women. Results: Without dexamethasone, obese women had higher plasma insulin concentrations in the fasting state, during the first phase of insulin secretion, and at the two hyperglycemic plateaus. However, they had normal whole body glucose metabolism compared with lean women, indicating adequate compensation. After dexamethasone, obese women had a 66% to 92% increase in plasma insulin concentrations but a 15.4% decrease in whole body glucose disposal. This contrasted with lean women, who had a 91% to 113% increase in plasma insulin concentrations, with no change in whole body glucose disposal. Discussion: Dexamethasone administration led to a significant reduction in whole body glucose disposal at fixed glycemia in obese but not lean women. This indicates that obese women are unable to increase their insulin secretion appropriately.     

Insulin and Endothelin in the Acute Regulation of Adiponectin in Vivo in Humans

Objective: In vitro, insulin and endothelin (ET) both modulate adiponectin secretion from adipocyte cell lines. The current studies were performed to assess whether endogenous ET contributes to the acute action of insulin infusions on adiponectin levels in vivo in humans. Research Methods and Procedures: We studied 17 lean and 20 obese subjects (BMI 21.8 ± 2.2 and 34.0 ± 5.0 kg/m², respectively). Hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp studies were performed using insulin infusion rates of 10, 30, or 300 mU/m² per minute alone or with concurrent infusion of BQ123, an antagonist of type A ET receptors. Circulating adiponectin levels were assessed at baseline and after achievement of steady‐state glucose with the insulin infusion. Results: Adiponectin levels were lower in obese than lean subjects (6.76 ± 3.66 vs. 8.37 ± 2.79 μg/mL, p = 0.0148 adjusted for differences across gender). Insulin infusions suppressed adiponectin by a mean of 7.8% (p < 0.0001). In a subset of 13 lean and 14 obese subjects for whom data with and without BQ123 were available, there was no evident effect of BQ123 to modulate clamp‐associated suppression of adiponectin (p = 0.16). Surprisingly, there was no evident relationship between steady‐state insulin concentrations and adiponectin suppression (r = 0.14, p = 0.30), and again no effect of BQ123 to modify this relationship was seen. Discussion: Despite baseline differences in adiponectin levels, we observed equal suppression of adiponectin with insulin infusions in lean and obese subjects. ET receptor antagonism with BQ123 did not modulate this effect, suggesting that endogenous ET does not have a role in modifying the acute effects of insulin on adiponectin production and/or disposition.     

Relationship of Insulin Sensitivity and Left Ventricular Mass in Uncomplicated Obesity

Objective: We studied uncomplicated obesity as a model to evaluate the influence of insulin sensitivity per se on left ventricular mass (LVM) and geometry. Research Methods and Procedures: We selected 50 obese subjects (BMI > 30 kg/m²; 38 women and 12 men; mean age, 38.4 ± 10 years; BMI, 36.4 ± 10.5 kg/m²) with normal blood pressure, glucose tolerance, and plasmatic lipid levels. Thirty lean subjects formed the control group. Each subject underwent euglycemic insulin clamp (7 pmol/min per kg) to evaluate whole body glucose use (M index) and echocardiogram to calculate LVM and indexed LVM. Results: Insulin‐resistant obese subjects had higher LVM, LVM/h^2.7, LVM/body surface area, and LVM/fat‐free mass_kg (p = 0.001; p = <0.001 p = 0.001, and p = 0.04, respectively) than obese subjects with normal insulin sensitivity. Multivariate regression analysis showed that M index was the strongest independent correlate of LVM (r² = 0.34; p = 0.03). Discussion: Our findings showed that insulin resistance, in uncomplicated obesity, is associated with an increased LVM and precocious changes of left ventricular geometry, whereas preserved insulin sensitivity is not associated with increased LVM.     

Plasma Adiponectin Increases Postprandially in Obese,but not in Lean,Subjects

Objective: We investigated the acute responses of plasma adiponectin levels to a test meal in lean and obese subjects. Research Methods and Procedures: We studied 13 lean and 11 obese subjects after a 10‐hour overnight fast. Glucose, insulin, and adiponectin concentrations were measured at baseline and 15, 30, 60, 120, and 180 minutes after a fixed breakfast. Results: At baseline, fasting adiponectin concentrations were lower in the obese group vs. the lean group [mean (95% confidence interval): 2.9 (2.1 to 4.1) μg/mL vs. 8.6 (6.5 to 11.3) μg/mL], but rose 4‐fold postprandially in the obese group, reaching a peak at 60 minutes [baseline: 2.9 (2.1 to 4.1) μg/mL vs. 60 minutes: 12.1 (8.5 to 17.4) μg/mL; p< 0.0001] and remaining elevated for the remainder of the study. There were no postprandial changes in plasma adiponectin concentrations in lean subjects. Discussion: This increase of adiponectin concentrations in obese individuals might have important beneficial effects on postprandial glucose and lipid metabolism and might be viewed as a mechanism for maintaining normal glucose tolerance in those who are obese and insulin resistant.     

Muscle glucose transport and phosphorylation in type 2 diabetic, obese nondiabetic, and genetically predisposed individuals

Our objectives were to quantitate insulin-stimulated inward glucose transport and glucose phosphorylation in forearm muscle in lean and obese nondiabetic subjects, in lean and obese type 2 diabetic (T2DM) subjects, and in normal glucose-tolerant, insulin-resistant offspring of two T2DM parents. Subjects received a euglycemic insulin (40 mU.m(-2).min(-1)) clamp with brachial artery/deep forearm vein catheterization. After 120 min of hyperinsulinemia, a bolus of d-mannitol/3-O-methyl-d-[(14)C]glucose/d-[3-(3)H]glucose (triple-tracer technique) was given into brachial artery and deep vein samples obtained every 12-30 s for 15 min. Insulin-stimulated forearm glucose uptake (FGU) and whole body glucose metabolism (M) were reduced by 40-50% in obese nondiabetic, lean T2DM, and obese T2DM subjects (all P < 0.01); in offspring, the reduction in FGU and M was approximately 30% (P < 0.05). Inward glucose transport and glucose phosphorylation were decreased by approximately 40-50% (P < 0.01) in obese nondiabetic and T2DM groups and closely paralleled the decrease in FGU. The intracellular glucose concentration in the space accessible to glucose was significantly greater in obese nondiabetic, lean T2DM, obese T2DM, and offspring compared with lean controls. We conclude that 1) obese nondiabetic, lean T2DM, and offspring manifest moderate-to-severe muscle insulin resistance (FGU and M) and decreased insulin-stimulated glucose transport and glucose phosphorylation in forearm muscle; these defects in insulin action are not further reduced by the combination of obesity plus T2DM; and 2) the increase in intracelullar glucose concentration under hyperinsulinemic euglycemic conditions in obese and T2DM groups suggests that the defect in glucose phosphorylation exceeds the defect in glucose transport.     

Adipocyte Differentiation‐related Protein in Human Skeletal Muscle: Relationship to Insulin Sensitivity

Objective: To determine whether adipocyte differentiation‐related protein (ADRP), a lipid droplet—associated protein that binds to and sequesters intracellular fatty acids, is 1) expressed in human skeletal muscle and 2) differentially regulated in human skeletal muscle obtained from obese non‐diabetic (OND) and obese diabetic (OD) subjects. Research Methods and Procedures: Ten OND subjects and 15 OD subjects underwent a weight loss or pharmacological intervention program to improve insulin sensitivity. Anthropometric data, hemoglobin A_1C, fasting glucose, lipids, and glucose disposal rate were determined at baseline and at completion of studies. Biopsies of the vastus lateralis muscle (SkM) were obtained in the fasting state from OND and OD subjects. Protein expression was determined by Western blotting. Results: ADRP was highly expressed in SkM from OND (4.4 ± 1.54 AU/10 μg, protein, n = 10) and OD (5.02 ± 1.33 AU/10 μg, n = 12) subjects. OND subjects undergoing weight loss had decreased triglyceride levels and improved insulin action. SkM ADRP content increased with weight loss from 5.14 ± 2.15 AU/10 μg to 9.92 ± 1.57 AU/10 μg (p < 0.025). OD subjects were treated with either troglitazone or metformin, together with glyburide, for 3 to 4 months. Both treatments attained similar levels of glycemic control. OD subjects with lower baseline ADRP content (2.85 ± 1.07 AU/10 μg, n = 6) displayed up‐regulation of ADRP expression (to 9.27 ± 2.76 AU/10 μg, p < 0.025). Discussion: ADRP is the predominant lipid droplet—associated protein in SkM, and low ADRP expression is up‐regulated in circumstances of improved glucose tolerance. Up‐regulation of ADRP may act to sequester fatty acids as triglycerides in discrete lipid droplets that could protect muscle from the detrimental effects of fatty acids on insulin action and glucose tolerance.     

Effect of Glucose Tolerance Status on PAI‐1 Plasma Levels in Overweight and Obese Subjects

Objective: The aim of our study was to examine whether plasminogen activator inhibitor‐1 (PAI‐1) plasma levels varied as a function of differences in glucose tolerance status independently of body fatness, body‐fat distribution, and insulin sensitivity. Research Methods and Procedures: Plasma PAI‐1 antigen levels, along with insulin resistance [measured by homeostatic model assessment (HOMA_IR)], central fat accumulation, body composition, blood pressure, and fasting concentrations of glucose, insulin, and lipids, were measured in 229 overweight and obese [body mass index (BMI) ≥25 kg/m²) subjects with normal glucose tolerance (NGT) and in 44 age‐ and BMI‐matched subjects with impaired glucose tolerance (IGT). Results: Plasma PAI‐1 antigen levels were significantly higher in IGT than in NGT subjects. Log PAI‐1 was positively correlated with BMI, HOMA_IR, and log insulin, and inversely associated with high‐density lipoprotein‐cholesterol both in IGT and in NGT individuals. On the other hand, log PAI‐1 was positively correlated with waist circumference, fat mass (FM), fat‐free mass, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, and log triglycerides only in the NGT group. After multivariate analyses, the strongest determinants of PAI‐1 levels were BMI, FM, waist circumference, and high‐density lipoprotein cholesterol in the NGT group and only HOMA_IR in the IGT cohort. Discussion: This study demonstrates that PAI‐1 concentrations are higher in IGT than in NGT subjects. Furthermore, we suggest that the influences of total adiposity, central fat, and insulin resistance, main determinants of PAI‐1 concentrations, are different according to the degree of glucose tolerance.     

Cold‐Induced Adaptive Thermogenesis in Lean and Obese

On entering a cold environment, people react by increasing insulation and energy expenditure (EE). However, large interindividual differences exist in the relative contribution of each mechanism. Short‐term studies revealed that obese subjects increase EE (i.e., adaptive thermogenesis) less than lean subjects, which might have implications for the predisposition to obesity. In this study, we validate the differences in adaptive thermogenesis between lean and obese upon midterm mild cold exposure. Therefore, 10 lean and 10 obese subjects were exposed for 48 h to mild cold (16 °C) in a respiration chamber. The preceding 36 h they stayed in the same chamber at a neutral temperature (22 °C) for the baseline measurements. EE, physical activity, skin temperature, and core temperature have been measured for the last 24 h of both parts. Mean daytime EE increased significantly in the lean subjects (P < 0.01), but not in the obese. Physical activity decreased significantly in the lean (P < 0.01) and the obese (P < 0.001) subjects. The change in EE was related to the change in physical activity in both groups (respectively R² = 0.673, P < 0.01 and R² = 0.454, P < 0.05). Upon mild cold exposure, lean subjects decreased proximal skin temperature less, but distal skin temperature more than obese. In conclusion, the interindividual differences in cold‐induced thermogenesis were related to changes in physical activity in both lean and obese, pointing at the existence of individual variation in physical activity to compensate for cold‐induced thermogenesis. Furthermore, although a large part of the lean subjects counteracted the cold by increasing EE, most obese subjects changed temperature distribution, and therefore, increased insulation.     

Fasting-based estimates of insulin sensitivity in overweight and obesity: a critical appraisal

Objective: To identify simple methods to estimate the degree of insulin resistance. Research Methods and Procedures: The performance of a wide range of fasting‐based index estimates of insulin sensitivity was compared by receiver operating characteristic analysis (area under curves and their 95% confidence intervals) against the M value from euglycemic insulin clamp studies collected in the San Antonio (non‐Hispanic whites and Hispanic residents of San Antonio, TX) and European Group for the Study of Insulin Resistance (non‐diabetic white Europeans) databases (n = 638). Results: Insulin resistance differed substantially between lean (BMI < 25 kg/m²), overweight or obese (BMI ≥ 25 kg/m²), and type 2 diabetic individuals. Estimates of insulin resistance were, therefore, assessed in each group separately. In the overweight and obese subgroup (n = 302), the receiver operating characteristic performance of fasting‐based indices varied from 0.72 (0.62 to 0.82), in the case of the insulin/glucose ratio, to 0.80 (0.72 to 0.88) in the case of Belfiore free fatty acids. One superior method could not be identified; the confidence intervals overlapped, and no statistically significant differences emerged. All indices performed better when using the whole study population, with fasting plasma insulin, homeostatic model assessment, insulin/glucose ratio, quantitative insulin sensitivity check index, glucose/insulin ratio, Belfiore glycemia, revised quantitative insulin sensitivity check index, McAuley index, and Belfiore free fatty acids showing area under curves of 0.83, 0.90, 0.66, 0.90, 0.66, 0.90, 0.85, 0.83, and 0.86, respectively, because of the inclusion of very insulin sensitive (lean) and very insulin resistant cases (diabetic subjects). Discussion: In conclusion, a superior fasting‐based index estimate to distinguish between the presence and absence of insulin resistance in overweight and obesity could not be identified despite the use of the large datasets.     

The Association between Plasma Adiponectin and Insulin Sensitivity in Humans Depends on Obesity

Objective: In humans, low plasma adiponectin concentrations precede a decrease in insulin sensitivity and predict type 2 diabetes independently of obesity. However, it is possible that the contribution of adiponectin to insulin sensitivity is not equally strong over the whole range of obesity. Research Methods and Procedures: We investigated the cross‐sectional association between plasma adiponectin levels and insulin sensitivity in different ranges of body fat content [expressed as percentage of body fat (PFAT)] in a large cohort of normal glucose‐tolerant subjects (n = 900). All individuals underwent an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), and 299 subjects additionally a euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamp. In longitudinal analyses, the association of adiponectin at baseline with change in insulin sensitivity was investigated in a subgroup of 108 subjects. Results: In cross‐sectional analyses, the association between plasma adiponectin and insulin sensitivity, adjusted for age, gender, and PFAT, depended on whether subjects were lean or obese [p for interaction adiponectin × PFAT = <0.001 (OGTT) and 0.002 (clamp)]. Stratified by quartiles of PFAT, adiponectin did not correlate significantly with insulin sensitivity in subjects in the lowest PFAT quartile (R² = 0.10, p = 0.13, OGTT; and R² = 0.10, p = 0.57, clamp), whereas the association in the upper PFAT quartile was rather strong (R² = 0.36, p < 0.0001, OGTT; and R² = 0.48, p = 0.003, clamp). In longitudinal analyses, plasma adiponectin at baseline preceded change in insulin sensitivity in obese (n = 54, p = 0.03) but not in lean (n = 54, p = 0.68) individuals. Discussion: These data suggest that adiponectin is especially critical in sustaining insulin sensitivity in obese subjects. Thus, interventions to reduce insulin resistance by increasing adiponectin concentrations may be effective particularly in obese, insulin‐resistant individuals.     

The Insulin Tolerance Test in Morbidly Obese Patients Undergoing Bariatric Surgery

Objective: To assess the effect of massive weight loss in relation to insulin resistance and its correlation to changes in glycemic homeostasis and lipid profile in severely obese patients. Research Methods and Procedures: A prospective clinical intervention study was carried out with 31 morbidly obese women (body mass index: 54.2 ± 8.8 kg/m²) divided into three groups according to their glucose tolerance test: 14 normal, 8 impaired glucose tolerance, and 9 type 2 diabetes. All subjects underwent an insulin tolerance test with intravenous bolus of 0.1 U insulin/kg body weight before silastic ring vertical gastroplasty Roux‐en‐Y gastric bypass surgery, and again at 2, 4, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. Fasting plasma glucose, hemoglobin A1c, and lipid profile were also evaluated. Results: A reduction of 68 ± 15% in initial excess body weight was evident within 1 year. Along with weight loss, the following statistically significant changes were found: an increase in the insulin‐sensitivity index (Kitt) and a decrease in fasting plasma glucose and hemoglobin A1c, most notably in the type 2 diabetes group. An overall improvement in lipid profile was observed in all three groups. Discussion: Bariatric surgery was an effective therapeutic approach for these obese patients because it reduced both weight and insulin resistance, along with improving metabolic parameters. Significant correlations were found between insulin resistance and metabolic improvements. Weight loss after bariatric surgery induced an improvement in metabolic fitness, related to the reduction in insulin resistance over a range of glucose tolerance statuses from normal to diabetic.     

Potential epigenetic biomarkers of obesity-related insulin resistance in human whole-blood

Obesity can increase the risk of complex metabolic diseases, including insulin resistance. Moreover, obesity can be caused by environmental and genetic factors. However, the epigenetic mechanisms of obesity are not well defined. Therefore, the identification of novel epigenetic biomarkers of obesity allows for a more complete understanding of the disease and its underlying insulin resistance. The aim of our study was to identify DNA methylation changes in whole-blood that were strongly associated with obesity and insulin resistance. Whole-blood was obtained from lean (n = 10; BMI = 23.6 ± 0.7 kg/m²) and obese (n = 10; BMI = 34.4 ± 1.3 kg/m²) participants in combination with euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamps to assess insulin sensitivity. We performed reduced representation bisulfite sequencing on genomic DNA isolated from the blood. We identified 49 differentially methylated cytosines (DMCs; q < 0.05) that were altered in obese compared with lean participants. We identified 2 sites (Chr.21:46,957,981 and Chr.21:46,957,915) in the 5’ untranslated region of solute carrier family 19 member 1 (SLC19A1) with decreased methylation in obese participants (lean 0.73 ± 0.11 vs. obese 0.09 ± 0.05; lean 0.68 ± 0.10 vs. obese 0.09 ± 0.05, respectively). These 2 DMCs identified by obesity were also significantly predicted by insulin sensitivity (r = 0.68, P = 0.003; r = 0.66; P = 0.004). In addition, we performed a differentially methylated region (DMR) analysis and demonstrated a decrease in methylation of Chr.21:46,957,915–46,958,001 in SLC19A1 of ?34.9% (70.4% lean vs. 35.5% obese). The decrease in whole-blood SLC19A1 methylation in our obese participants was similar to the change observed in skeletal muscle (Chr.21:46,957,981, lean 0.70 ± 0.09 vs. obese 0.31 ± 0.11 and Chr.21:46,957,915, lean 0.72 ± 0.11 vs. obese 0.31 ± 0.13). Pyrosequencing analysis further demonstrated a decrease in methylation at Chr.21:46,957,915 in both whole-blood (lean 0.71 ± 0.10 vs. obese 0.18 ± 0.06) and skeletal muscle (lean 0.71 ± 0.10 vs. obese 0.30 ± 0.11). Our findings demonstrate a new potential epigenetic biomarker, SLC19A1, for obesity and its underlying insulin resistance.