Identification of genes differentially expressed in husk tomato (<Emphasis Type="Italic">Physalis philadelphica</Emphasis>) in response to whitefly (<Emphasis Type="Italic">Trialeurodes vaporariorum</Emphasis>) infestation

Plants respond to phloem-feeding whiteflies by extensive changes in gene expression. To identify differentially expressed genes in husk tomato plants (Physalis philadelphica) infested with Trialeurodes vaporariorum, young plants were challenged with adult whiteflies, and forward and reverse subtractive libraries were constructed from infested leaves at 5 and 15 days after infestation. Several genes were identified as up-regulated; these included a diversity of genes involved in plant defense responses, protein synthesis or degradation, and cell wall fortification or modification. Genes required for amino acid biosynthesis, lipid metabolism and synthesis, including cell surface components such as suberin, responses to stress, photosynthesis and other functions, were similarly induced. Down-regulated genes were also identified, most prominently kinases and aquaporin genes. Similarities in defense responses between tomato and P. philadelphica were noted regarding the expression of certain genes in response to nematode, aphid, or whitefly. A role for abscisic acid, brassinosteroids, and cytokinins in the regulated response to whitefly infestation in P. philadelphica was also implied by the expression pattern of phytohormone-associated genes, including genes coding for proteins containing F-box motifs. Differential expression of selected genes was validated by quantitative real-time PCR. The possible role played by some of these genes during whitefly infestation is discussed.     

A functional response evaluation of pre-infestation with <Emphasis Type="Italic">Bemisia tabaci</Emphasis> cryptic species MEAM1 on predation by <Emphasis Type="Italic">Propylea japonica</Emphasis> of <Emphasis Type="Italic">Myzus persicae</Emphasis> on host plant tomatoes

Herbivore feeding on host plants may induce defense responses of the plant which influence other herbivores and interacting species in the vicinity, such as natural enemies. The present work evaluated the impact of pre-infestation with the tobacco whitefly Bemisia tabaci cryptic species MEAM 1, on the predation ability of the ladybird Propylea japonica, to the green peach aphid Myzus persicae, on tomato plants. The results show that B. tabaci pre-infestation density, duration, and leaf position, can impact prey consumed by P. japonica under various aphid densities. The aphids consumed by P. japonica in each treatment were fit using the Holling type II functional response equation. The predatory efficiency (a/T _h) of P. japonica was the highest in the treatment with 60 aphids and 48-h infestation directly on damaged leaves. The predatory efficiencies of P. japonica decreased with a reduction of pre-infestation density and duration. We also observed that pre-infestation on young and undamaged leaves increased predation by P. japonica.     

Host preferences and biotic potential of <Emphasis Type="Italic">Trialeurodes vaporariorum</Emphasis> and <Emphasis Type="Italic">Bemisia tabaci</Emphasis> (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) in tomato and pepper

Whiteflies Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius) and Trialeurodes vaporariorum (Westwood) (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) are important pests in pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) and tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) crops in many countries. Contrary to what is observed for all other countries, in Uruguay, B. tabaci is mainly found on pepper and rarely on tomato, while T. vaporariorum is exclusively found on tomato. This study tested the oviposition preferences and biotic potential of these two whiteflies reared on both host plants. The developmental time, survival rates, longevity, fecundity and main population parameters were characterized. Both whitefly species showed different preference patterns regarding their host plants. T. vaporariorum preferred tomato instead of pepper to oviposit. Their developmental time is longer on pepper. B. tabaci preferred pepper, but the difference from tomato was not very strong. Pepper affects the biotic expression of T. vaporariorum negatively, while B. tabaci is able to develop equally on both host plants. These results show that the distribution differences of both whiteflies observed on both host plants could have a biological basis.     

Direct and Indirect Impacts of Infestation of Tomato Plant by Myzus persicae (Hemiptera: Aphididae) on Bemisia tabaci (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae)

The impacts of infestation by the green peach aphid (Myzus persicae) on sweetpotato whitefly (Bemisia tabaci) settling on tomato were determined in seven separate experiments with whole plants and with detached leaves through manipulation of four factors: durations of aphid infestation, density of aphids, intervals between aphid removal after different durations of infestation and the time of whitefly release, and leaf positions on the plants. The results demonstrated that B. tabaci preferred to settle on the plant leaves that had not been infested by aphids when they had a choice. The plant leaves on which aphids were still present (direct effect) had fewer whiteflies than those previously infested by aphids (indirect effect). The whiteflies were able to settle on the plant which aphids had previously infested, and also could settle on leaves with aphids if no uninfested plants were available. Tests of direct factors revealed that duration of aphid infestation had a stronger effect on whitefly landing preference than aphid density; whitefly preference was the least when 20 aphids fed on the leaves for 72 h. Tests of indirect effects revealed that the major factor that affected whitefly preference for a host plant was the interval between the time of aphid removal after infestation and the time of whitefly release. The importance of the four factors that affected the induced plant defense against whiteflies can be arranged in the following order: time intervals between aphid removal and whitefly release > durations of aphid infestation > density of aphids > leaf positions on the plants. In conclusion, the density of aphid infestation and time for which they were feeding influenced the production of induced compounds by tomatoes, the whitefly responses to the plants, and reduced interspecific competition.     

Reduction of sooty mold damage through biocontrol of the greenhouse whitefly <Emphasis Type="Italic">Trialeurodes vaporariorum</Emphasis> (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) using selective insecticides in tomato cultivation greenhouses

The proliferation of sooty mold on tomato fruit, Solanum lycopersicum L.—as caused by the secretion of honeydew on the fruit by greenhouse whitefly, Trialeurodes vaporariorum (Westwood) (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae)—has recently become a serious problem in estivo-autumnal greenhouse tomato cultivation in Japan. It is becoming increasingly difficult to control T. vaporariorum using insecticides because whiteflies have developed resistance to a variety of insecticides. As the first step towards integrated pest management, we examined whether the use of selective insecticides could prompt a cascade process in which an increase in parasitoids is followed by a decrease in whitefly occurrence and then a reduction in sooty mold damage. We compared greenhouses in which nonselective insecticides effective against T. vaporariorum and its parasitoids were used (hereafter denoted “nonselective insecticide greenhouses”) with greenhouses in which selective insecticides for T. vaporariorum were used (hereafter denoted “selective insecticide greenhouses”) in terms of the density and level of parasitism of T. vaporariorum as well as the degree of damage from sooty mold. The number of parasitized whiteflies increased with the number of whiteflies in the selective insecticide greenhouses, whereas it remained at low levels regardless of the number of whiteflies in the nonselective insecticide greenhouses. Furthermore, the selective insecticide greenhouses showed significantly higher parasitism levels, fewer whiteflies, and reduced sooty mold damage compared to the nonselective insecticide greenhouses. These results suggest that the use of selective insecticides causes an increase in parasitism, which in turn suppresses the number of greenhouse whiteflies and, eventually, sooty mold.     

Detection of symbionts and virus in the whitefly <Emphasis Type="Italic">Bemisia tabaci</Emphasis> (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae), vector of the <Emphasis Type="Italic">Mungbean yellow mosaic India virus</Emphasis> in Central India

Legume crops in Central India, the main soybean production area of the country, may suffer from yellow mosaic disease caused by the Mungbean yellow mosaic India virus (MYMIV). MYMIV is transmitted by the sweet potato whitefly, Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius), which is a species complex composed of various genetic groups. This vector species harbors different endosymbionts among regional strains and among individuals. To elucidate fundamental aspects of this virus vector in the state of Madhya Pradesh, the infection status of the symbionts and the virus in whiteflies was studied. A polymerase chain reaction (PCR) survey of the whiteflies collected in Madhya Pradesh found four secondary endosymbionts, Arsenophonus, Hemipteriphilus, Wolbachia, and Cardinium, in addition to the primary endosymbiont Portiera. Arsenophonus and Hemipteriphilus were highly infected but the infection rates of Wolbachia and Cardinium were low. MYMIV was detected in whitefly populations collected from various host plants in Madhya Pradesh. The whitefly populations belonged to the Asia I and II genetic groups; several different Asia II populations were also distributed. Specific relations were not observed among symbiont infection status, virus infection, and the whitefly genetic groups in the populations of Madhya Pradesh, though Cardinium was highly detected in the Asia II-1 group. New primers, which can be used for PCR template validation and for discriminating two phylogenetically close endosymbionts, were designed.     

Fungal root endophytes of tomato from Kenya and their nematode biocontrol potential

The significance of fungal endophytes in African agriculture, particularly Kenya, has not been well investigated. Therefore, the objective of the present work was isolation, multi-gene phylogenetic characterization and biocontrol assessment of endophytic fungi harbored in tomato roots for nematode infection management. A survey was conducted in five different counties along the central and coastal regions of Kenya to determine the culturable endophytic mycobiota. A total of 76 fungal isolates were obtained and characterized into 40 operational taxonomic units based on the analysis of ITS, β-tubulin and tef1α gene sequence data. Among the fungal isolates recovered, the most prevalent species associated with tomato roots were members of the Fusarium oxysporum and F. solani species complexes. Of the three genes utilized for endophyte characterization, tef1α provided the best resolution. A combination of ITS, β-tubulin and tef1α resulted in a better resolution as compared to single gene analysis. Biotests demonstrated the ability of selected non-pathogenic fungal isolates to successfully reduce nematode penetration and subsequent galling as well as reproduction of the root-knot nematode Meloidogyne incognita. Most Trichoderma asperellum and F. oxysporum species complex isolates reduced root-knot nematode egg densities by 35–46 % as compared to the non-fungal control and other isolates. This study provides first insights into the culturable endophytic mycobiota of tomato roots in Kenya and the potential of some isolates for use against the root-knot nematode M. incognita. The data can serve as a framework for fingerprinting potential beneficial endophytic fungal isolates which are optimized for abiotic and biotic environments and are useful in biocontrol strategies against nematode pests in Kenyan tomato cultivars. This information would therefore provide an alternative or complementary crop protection component.     

Selenium Nanoparticles—an Inducer of Tomato Resistance to the Root-Knot Nematode <Emphasis Type="Italic">Meloidogyne incognita</Emphasis> (Kofoid et White, 1919) Chitwood 1949

We investigated the mechanisms of action of selenium nanoparticles obtained by laser ablation for their use as an abiogenic elicitor of tomato resistance to parasitic nematodes. Selenium nanoparticles induced systemic resistance of tomatoes to the root-knot nematode, stimulated plant growth and development, was involved in the PR-6 gene expression in the roots and leaves of plants subjected to invasion, and increased the activity of proteinase inhibitors (markers of systemic resistance of plants to infection). Exogenous treatment of plants with solutions of selenium nanoparticles reduced the invasion of plants by affecting the morphological and physiological parameters of the parasites in the roots.     

Improved tolerance against <Emphasis Type="Italic">Helicoverpa armigera</Emphasis> in transgenic tomato over-expressing multi-domain proteinase inhibitor gene from <Emphasis Type="Italic">Capsicum annuum</Emphasis>

Plant proteinase inhibitors (PIs) are plant defense proteins and considered as potential candidates for engineering plant resistances against herbivores. Capsicum annuum proteinase inhibitor (CanPI7) is a multi-domain potato type II inhibitor (Pin-II) containing four inhibitory repeat domains (IRD), which target major classes of digestive enzymes in the gut of Helicoverpa armigera larvae. Stable integration and expression of the transgene in T1 transgenic generation, were confirmed by established molecular techniques. Protein extract of transgenic tomato lines showed increased inhibitory activity against H. armigera gut proteinases, supporting those domains of CanPI7 protein to be effective and active. When T1 generation plants were analyzed, they exhibited antibiosis effect against first instar larvae of H. armigera. Further, larvae fed on transgenic tomato leaves showed delayed growth relative to larvae fed on control plants, but did not change mortality rates significantly. Thus, better crop protection can be achieved in transgenic tomato by overexpression of multi-domain proteinase inhibitor CanPI7 gene against H. armigera larvae.     

Effects of herbivory and mistletoe infection by <Emphasis Type="Italic">Psittacanthus calyculatus</Emphasis> on nutritional quality and chemical defense of <Emphasis Type="Italic">Quercus deserticola</Emphasis> along Mexican forest fragments

Mistletoes are parasitic plants that show effects that can parallel or contrast with those caused by herbivores to their host plants, particularly on aspects such as host biomass, resource allocation patterns, and interspecific interactions at the community level. In this study, we evaluated the potential synergistic effects of herbivory and infection by the mistletoe Psittacanthus calyculatus on nutritional quality and chemical defense of the white oak Quercus deserticola along forest fragments in Mexico. For this, we sampled leaves of parasitized oaks, unparasitized oaks and mistletoes at four forest fragments in the Cuitzeo basin, Michoacán state, Mexico, and measured herbivory levels and foliar water content, total nonstructural carbohydrates, phenols, flavonoids, and hydrolyzable tannins in each sample. Higher levels of infection by P. calyculatus were found in the smaller forest fragments, while foliar damage by herbivores was higher in larger forest fragments. At all sites, levels of herbivory were lower in the mistletoe than in both parasitized and unparasitized oaks. However, there was a positive relationship between herbivory levels in parasitized oaks and their mistletoes. Also, foliar water content and total phenol concentration were positively correlated between the oaks and the mistletoes. The results suggest that herbivory levels in parasitized hosts and mistletoes depend on the close physiological interaction between the nutritional quality and the chemical defense of the two plants involved. This is one of the few studies analyzing the chemical ecology of the interaction between plant hosts and plant parasites.     

A cry for help from leaf to root: Aboveground insect feeding leads to the recruitment of rhizosphere microbes for plant self-protection against subsequent diverse attacks

Plants have evolved general and specific defense mechanisms to protect themselves from diverse enemies, including herbivores and pathogens. To maintain fitness in the presence of enemies, plant defense mechanisms are aimed at inducing systemic resistance: in response to the attack of pathogens or herbivores, plants initiate extensive changes in gene expression to activate “systemic acquired resistance” against pathogens and “indirect defense” against herbivores. Recent work revealed that leaf infestation by whiteflies, stimulated systemic defenses against both an airborne pathogen and a soil-borne pathogen, which was confirmed by the detection of the systemic expression of pathogenesis-related genes in response to salicylic acid and jasmonic acid-signaling pathway activation. Further investigation revealed that plants use self protection mechanisms against subsequent herbivore attacks by recruiting beneficial microorganisms called plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria/fungi, which are capable of reducing whitefly populations. Our results provide new evidence that plant-mediated aboveground to belowground communication and vice versa are more common than expected.Key words: aboveground, induced systemic resistance, pepper, plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria, underground, whiteflyAs sessile organisms, plants are unable to actively avoid the attack of predators. To overcome this, plants have evolved a multilayer immune system against herbivores and pathogens.¹ Plants, unlike animals, lack adaptive immunity. Instead, plants are dependent on a heritable, innate immunity based on the recognition by receptors of the presence of microbial triggers (cues) including effector proteins and microbe-associated molecular patterns.¹ The perception of microbial cues leads to the induction of a broad spectrum of plant defenses called systemic acquired resistance (SAR).² Until recently, SAR was thought to be limited to the induction of plant defenses against foliar microbial pathogens. However, recent results suggested that plants can activate signal exchanges between aboveground (AG) and belowground (BG) responses.³ Three phenomena indicate that plants can make use of cues that are systemically indicative of future enemy attack: (1) induced resistance against AG pathogens by BG microbes and vice versa, (2) indirect defenses against AG insects by AG herbivore infestation and (3) BG pathogen infection leading to root exudate-mediated recruitment of BG bacteria. First, many strains of rhizosphere microbes referred to as plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria/fungi (PGPR/PGPF) have beneficial effects by positively affecting plant growth and resistance against foliar plant pathogens—a process known as induced systemic resistance (ISR).⁴ Inducible defense responses triggered by the foliar pathogen Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000 included the induction of root secretions such as L-malic acid that effectively recruited a PGPR strain, Bacillus subtilis FB17, in Arabidopsis roots.⁵ Second, herbivore attacks on plants trigger the induction of distinct resistance responses referred to as “indirect defenses.”⁶ In addition to the “direct defense” reaction mediated by the de novo production of toxic secondary compounds against enemies, plants also defend themselves by releasing volatile organic compounds (VOCs) or extrafloral nectar (EFN) to attract natural enemies (carnivores) of the herbivores AG.⁷ Third, as plant root exudates function as BG signaling molecules that affect the composition of rhizosphere microbial populations,⁸ certain rhizobacteria express antifungal-associated genes such as the 2,4-diacetylphloroglucinol biosynthesis gene phlA. The expression of these genes is in turn influenced by root exudates, which are modulated by soilborne fungal infections.⁹In prior studies, only one-way signal transduction was considered, such as AG to BG, AG to AG or BG to BG (Fig. 1).^10–13 The above three examples provide evidence of induced resistance against the same or a similar group of organisms, such as resistance against insects by insects, or against microbes by microbes. However, there are few studies addressing insect-microbe combinations during the elicitation of induced resistance. More specifically, indirect defenses by symbiotic root interactions AG were found, such as the volatile blends released by plants with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, which were more attractive to aphid parasitoids than the blends from plants without mycorrhiza.¹⁴ The BG to AG defense responses of plants are not limited to arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi against herbivores. In addition to mycorrhiza-altered insect feeding preferences, a combination of Pseudomonas spp. strains affected the development of leaffolder pest and actively enhanced resistance against leaffolder attack by triggering the synthesis of systemic defense enzymes such as chitinase and proteinase inhibitors in rice plants.¹⁵ Bacillus sp. PGPR strain treatment of tomato triggered ISR to Tomato mottle virus under natural conditions by reducing the population of the silverleaf whitefly vector.¹⁶Open in a separate windowFigure 1Putative model of plant-mediated aboveground to belowground communication and vice versa during the induction of systemic resistance via tritrophic (insect-plant-rhizobacteria) interactions. (A) A plant under normal condition. (B) Whitefly infestation elicits plant systemic defenses against leaf and root pathogens. Chemical cues from root exudates secreted from AG whitefly infestation trigger the recruitment of beneficial microbes including saprophytic fungi, Gram-positive bacteria and actinomycetes. (C) The induction of systemic resistance by colonization by beneficial microbes confers plant self-protection against subsequent herbivore attacks.Recently, we found another type of induced resistance response: bidirectional signal exchanges between AG and BG (Fig. 1).¹⁷ Our study demonstrated that the phloem feeding whiteflies can induce systemic resistance against both a leaf bacterial pathogen and a soil-borne bacterial pathogen. A similar study using the whitefly as an AG feeding insect to test the induction of plant defenses only observed its effects against conspecific insect herbivore competitors AG.¹⁸ However, in our study, foliar attack by the whitefly not only elicited AG resistance against a leaf pathogenic bacterium, Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. vesicatoria, but also enhanced resistance against the soil-borne pathogenic bacterium, Ralstonia solanacearum. The induction of systemic resistance was confirmed by significant upregulation of the SA and JA defense signaling pathway marker genes, Capsicum annuum pathogenesis-related protein (CaPR)1, CaPR4, CaPR10 and Ca protease inhibitor (CaPIN) in both leaves (AG) and roots (BG) after whitefly feeding. Interestingly, AG white-fly feeding significantly increased the population density of beneficial BG microflora including Gram-positive bacteria, actinomycetes and saprophytic fungi that may induce systemic resistance (Fig 1).⁴ Among BG microbial groups, several Grampositive Bacillus sp. strains significantly elicited plant systemic defenses against the whitefly population in the tomato field.¹⁶ Our studies provide a new understanding of tritrophic (insect-plant-PGPR) interactions and their role in the induction of defense mechanisms. In the near future, it will be important to define plant defense signaling molecules from AG to BG and to dissect the signaling transduction pathways using “omics” technology to reveal the mechanisms by which plants protect themselves against enemy attacks.     

Physiological and biochemical changes in tomato cultivar PT-3 with dual inoculation of mycorrhiza and PGPR against root-knot nematode

Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) and plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) have potential to control soil-borne diseases including plant-parasitic nematodes. First, the effects of dual inoculation of mycorrhiza (Rhizophagus irregularis) and two stains of pseudomonads (Pseudomonas jessenii strain R62 and Pseudomonas synxantha strain R81) on tomato (Solanum lycopersicum cv. PT-3) growth were tested. Further, the physiological and biochemical changes caused by these beneficial organisms during infection by the root-knot nematode Meloidogyne incognita were studied. The experiment was conducted under glass house conditions and carried out up to one month after nematode inoculation. Plants treated with dual or individual inoculation of AMF and PGPR showed significantly enhanced plant growth and reduced nematode infection. In addition, they exhibited potent activity of phenolics (28 %) and defensive enzymes i.e. peroxidase (PO; 1.26 fold), polyphenyloxidase (PPO; 1.35 fold) and superoxide dismutase (SOD; 1.09 fold) while a significant reduction in malondialdehyde (MDA; 1.63 fold) and hydrogen peroxide (H₂O₂; 1.30 fold) content was recorded when compared to the nematode-infected plants. These findings indicate the feasibility of AMF and PGPR individually or in combinations as potential biocontrol agents for the management of root-knot nematodes.