Peripheral Immunization Blocks Lethal Actions of Vesicular Stomatitis Virus within the Brain

Vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) is the prototype virus for 75 or more negative-strand RNA viruses in the rhabdovirus family. Some of these viruses, including VSV, can cause neurological impairment or death upon brain infection. VSV has shown promise in the prevention and treatment of disease as a vaccine vector and an oncolytic virus, but infection of the brain remains a concern. Three VSV variants, the wild-type-related VSV-G/GFP and two attenuated viruses, VSV-CT1 and VSV-CT9-M51, were compared for neuroinvasiveness and neuromorbidity. In nonimmunized mice, direct VSV-G/GFP injection into the brain invariably resulted in lethal encephalitis; in contrast, partial survival was seen after direct injection of the attenuated VSV strains. In addition, both attenuated VSV strains showed significantly reduced neuroinvasiveness after intranasal inoculation of young postnatal day 16 mice. Of the three tested variants, VSV-CT9-M51 generated the lowest degree of neuropathology. Despite its attenuated state, peripheral inoculations of VSV-CT9-M51 targeted and killed human glioblastoma implanted into the mouse brain. Importantly, we show here that intranasal or intramuscular immunization prevents the lethal effects of subsequent VSV-G/GFP, VSV-CT1, and VSV-CT9-M51 injections into the brain. These results indicate that attenuated recombinant viruses show reduced neurovirulence and that peripheral immunization blocks the lethal actions of all VSVs tested.The brain occupies a special niche in viral immunity, and due to a number of mechanisms, viruses in the periphery generally do not enter the brain. However, the same mechanisms that give the brain a special protected status can also impede an immune response against intracerebral infection by viruses. Although many negative-strand RNA viruses can be tolerated peripherally, central nervous system (CNS) infection with vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV), rabies virus, measles virus, influenza virus, and others (14, 24, 28, 30, 34) can be fatal for rodents and for humans. Peripheral immunization does protect the brain from virus infections, but in most studies, it does so by eliminating viruses before they penetrate the blood-brain barrier and enter the brain (4, 25, 29, 38). In contrast, the set of experiments described here address the question of whether peripheral immunization can block the lethal consequences of direct VSV infections within the brain. When injected into the brain, VSV can cause permanent neurological dysfunction in rodents or primates (19, 28) or lethal encephalitis (11, 15). VSV can also enter the brain from the periphery along a cranial nerve, for instance, the olfactory nerve after intranasal administration, and can subsequently spread from the olfactory system to other regions of the brain (24, 36).Recombinant VSVs have shown promise in two respects: VSV can serve as a robust vaccine vector (26, 27, 16) and as a potent oncolytic virus against a variety of peripheral (1, 3, 10, 33) or CNS (9, 18, 22, 39, 40) tumors. A number of studies have shown the protective effects of peripheral immunization with VSV on peripheral viral infections (12, 13). In contrast, the effect of peripheral immunization on viral infections within the brain has received considerably less attention.Both as a vaccine vector and as an oncolytic virus, VSV infection of normal brain cells remains a concern. The set of experiments presented here addressed the primary question of whether peripheral immunization can protect the brain from subsequent direct exposure to VSV. A secondary question was whether recombinant VSVs with an attenuated phenotype in culture would also show reduced neurovirulence in the brain.VSV is an enveloped negative-strand RNA virus, and its 11.2-kb genome encodes five viral proteins (N, P, M, G, and L). VSV is a nonhuman pathogen that can cause a typically self-limiting disease in livestock with flu-like symptoms (20). Limiting factors of VSV for clinical use are its neurotropic properties and the still little understood potential of the brain to fight off a potential infection (5, 6, 15). The brain is largely protected from virus entry through the blood-brain barrier. Mice do not show signs of CNS infection after peripheral VSV application. In contrast, VSV with direct access to the CNS, either experimentally through direct injection or through the intranasal path, can spread through the brain, resulting in encephalitis with high mortality in mice. VSV spread through the brain after intranasal application is age dependent, with mature mice showing little or no spread beyond the olfactory nerve compared to young mice, which succumb to widespread viral infection throughout the brain (19, 36). Peripheral VSV infection triggers fast and effective upregulation of interferon-inducible genes, followed by induction of both the cellular and humoral branches of the systemic immune system.The extent of VSV pathogenesis in the brain is determined by the replicative efficacy of the virus and the efficiency of the host immune response in curbing the infection. Modification of either of these components can alter the course and extent of CNS damage. In the current work, we used a dual viral mutation that enhances the host innate cellular immune response (VSV-M51) and truncates the VSV-G cytoplasmic tail from 29 to 9 amino acids (VSV-CT9). Another VSV with a VSV-G truncation to 1 cytoplasmic amino acid (VSV-CT1), resulting in viral attenuation in vitro and in vivo, was also used (23, 31).Little is known about the extent to which the adaptive immune response can influence VSV within the brain. Here, we show that peripheral VSV immunization prior to intracerebral inoculation prevented lethal encephalitis in adult mice of the strongly attenuated VSV variants, VSV-CT9-M51 and VSV-CT1, as well as a wild-type VSV bearing a green fluorescent protein (GFP) reporter.     

Attenuation of Vesicular Stomatitis Virus Encephalitis through MicroRNA Targeting

Vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) has long been regarded as a promising recombinant vaccine platform and oncolytic agent but has not yet been tested in humans because it causes encephalomyelitis in rodents and primates. Recent studies have shown that specific tropisms of several viruses could be eliminated by engineering microRNA target sequences into their genomes, thereby inhibiting spread in tissues expressing cognate microRNAs. We therefore sought to determine whether microRNA targets could be engineered into VSV to ameliorate its neuropathogenicity. Using a panel of recombinant VSVs incorporating microRNA target sequences corresponding to neuron-specific or control microRNAs (in forward and reverse orientations), we tested viral replication kinetics in cell lines treated with microRNA mimics, neurotoxicity after direct intracerebral inoculation in mice, and antitumor efficacy. Compared to picornaviruses and adenoviruses, the engineered VSVs were relatively resistant to microRNA-mediated inhibition, but neurotoxicity could nevertheless be ameliorated significantly using this approach, without compromise to antitumor efficacy. Neurotoxicity was most profoundly reduced in a virus carrying four tandem copies of a neuronal mir125 target sequence inserted in the 3′-untranslated region of the viral polymerase (L) gene.Vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) is a nonsegmented, negative-strand rhabdovirus widely used as a vaccine platform as well as an anticancer therapeutic. While VSV is predominantly a pathogen of livestock (34), it has a very broad species tropism. The cellular tropism of VSV is determined predominantly at postentry steps, since the G glycoprotein of the virus mediates entry into most tissues in nearly all animal species (10).Though viral entry can take place in nearly all cell types, in vivo models of VSV infection have revealed that the virus is highly sensitive to the innate immune response, limiting its pathogenesis (4). VSV is intensively responsive to type I interferon (IFN), as the double-stranded RNA (dsRNA)-dependent PKR (2), the downstream effector of pattern recognition receptors MyD88 (32), and other molecules mediate shutdown of viral translation and allow the adaptive immune response to clear the virus. The vulnerability of the virus to the type I IFN response, typically defective in many cancers, has been exploited to generate tumor-selective replication (49), such that the virus is now poised to enter phase I trials. However, the virus remains potently neurotoxic, causing lethal encephalitis not only in rodent models (7, 22, 53) but also in nonhuman primates (25).VSV very often infiltrates the central nervous system (CNS) through infection of the olfactory nerves (41). When administered intranasally, the virus replicates rapidly in the nasal epithelium and is transmitted to olfactory neurons, from which it then moves retrograde axonally to the brain and replicates robustly, causing neuropathogenesis. While intranasal inoculation does cause neuropathy in mice, neurotoxicity following viral administration also occurs when the virus is delivered intravascularly (47), intraperitoneally (42), and (not surprisingly) intracranially (13). Previously, other groups have modified the VSV genome to be more sensitive to cellular IFNs (49) and have actually encoded IFN in the virus (36). However, the former can result in attenuation of the virus, such that it has reduced anticancer potential, while the latter still results in lethal encephalitis (unpublished results). In order to mitigate the effects of VSV infection on the brain without perturbing the potent oncolytic activity of the virus, we utilized a microRNA (miRNA) targeting paradigm, whereby viral replication is restricted in the brain without altering the tropism of the virus for other tissues.To redirect the tissue tropism of anticancer therapeutics, we (26) and others (11, 14, 55) have previously exploited the tissue-specific expression of cellular miRNAs. miRNAs are ∼22-nucleotide (nt) regulatory RNAs that regulate a diverse and expansive array of cellular activities. Through recognition of sequence-complementary target elements, miRNAs can either translationally suppress or catalytically degrade both cellular (6) and viral (50) RNAs. We have determined that cellular miRNAs can potentially regulate numerous steps of a virus life cycle and that this regulation of the virus by endogenous miRNAs can then abrogate toxicities of replication-competent viruses (27; E. J. Kelly et al., unpublished data).miRNAs are known to be highly upregulated in many different tissues, including (but not limited to) muscle (40), lung (44), liver (15, 44), spleen (44, 46), and kidney (51). In addition, the brain has a number of upregulated miRNAs, with each different subtype of cell having a unique miRNA profile. miR-125 is highly upregulated in all cells in the brain (neurons, astrocytes, and glia cells), while miR-124 is found predominantly in neuronal cells (48). Glial cells and glioblastomas are thought to have decreased expression of miR-128 compared to neurons (17), while miR-134 is particularly abundant in dendrites of neurons in the hippocampus (43). In addition to these miRNAs, the tumor suppressor miRNA let-7 and miRs 9, 26, and 29 (51) are also found to be enriched in the brain, with expression varying not only between different cell types and regions of the brain but also temporally (48).MicroRNAs have previously been exploited to modulate the tissue tropism of nonreplicating lentiviral vectors (8, 9), as well as curbing known toxicities of replication-competent picornaviruses (5, 26), adenoviruses (11), herpes simplex virus 1 (33), and influenza A virus (39). In addition, a recombinant VSV encoding a tumor suppressor target was found to be responsive to sequence-complementary miRNAs in vitro, possibly by affecting expression of the matrix (M) protein (14), and evidence from Dicer-deficient mice suggests that endogenously expressed microRNA targets within the P and L genes of VSV could restrict enhanced pathogenicity of the virus (37). However, in vivo protection from neuropathogenesis by this means has not been demonstrated for VSV.Here we evaluate the efficiencies of different brain-specific miRNAs for shutting down gene expression and extensively characterize the ability of miRNA targeting to attenuate the neurotoxicity of vesicular stomatitis virus in vivo. We constructed and evaluated recombinant VSVs with miRNA target (miRT) insertions at different regions of the viral genome, with special focus upon those affecting viral L expression. In addition, we looked at the regulatory efficiency of different brain-specific miRNAs and the impact of miRT orientation on VSV replication and determined the impact of the virus on oncolytic activity in vivo.     

The Respiratory Syncytial Virus Matrix Protein Possesses a Crm1-Mediated Nuclear Export Mechanism

The respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) matrix (M) protein is localized in the nucleus of infected cells early in infection but is mostly cytoplasmic late in infection. We have previously shown that M localizes in the nucleus through the action of the importin β1 nuclear import receptor. Here, we establish for the first time that M''s ability to shuttle to the cytoplasm is due to the action of the nuclear export receptor Crm1, as shown in infected cells, and in cells transfected to express green fluorescent protein (GFP)-M fusion proteins. Specific inhibition of Crm1-mediated nuclear export by leptomycin B increased M nuclear accumulation. Analysis of truncated and point-mutated M derivatives indicated that Crm1-dependent nuclear export of M is attributable to a nuclear export signal (NES) within residues 194 to 206. Importantly, inhibition of M nuclear export resulted in reduced virus production, and a recombinant RSV carrying a mutated NES could not be rescued by reverse genetics. That this is likely to be due to the inability of a nuclear export deficient M to localize to regions of virus assembly is indicated by the fact that a nuclear-export-deficient GFP-M fails to localize to regions of virus assembly when expressed in cells infected with wild-type RSV. Together, our data suggest that Crm1-dependent nuclear export of M is central to RSV infection, representing the first report of such a mechanism for a paramyxovirus M protein and with important implications for related paramyxoviruses.The Pneumovirus respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) within the Paramyxoviridae family is the most common cause of lower-respiratory-tract disease in infants (7). The negative-sense single-strand RNA genome of RSV encodes two nonstructural and nine structural proteins, comprising the envelope glycoproteins (F, G, and SH), the nucleocapsid proteins (N, P, and L), the nucleocapsid-associated proteins (M2-1 and M2-2), and the matrix (M) protein (1, 7, 11). Previously, we have shown that M protein localizes in the nucleus at early stages of infection, but later in infection it is localized mainly in the cytoplasm, in association with nucleocapsid-containing cytoplasmic inclusions (13, 16). The M proteins of other negative-strand viruses, such as Sendai virus, Newcastle disease virus, and vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV), have also been observed in the nucleus at early stages of infection (32, 40, 48). Interestingly, the M proteins of all of these viruses, including RSV, play major roles in virus assembly, which take place in the cytoplasm and at the cell membrane (11, 12, 24, 34, 36, 39), but the mechanisms by which trafficking between the nucleus and cytoplasm occurs are unknown.The importin β family member Crm1 (exportin 1) is known to mediate nuclear export of proteins bearing leucine-rich nuclear export signals (NES) (8, 9, 18, 19, 37, 42, 43), such as the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 Rev protein (4). In the case of the influenza virus matrix (M1) protein, binding to the influenza virus nuclear export protein, which possesses a Crm1-recognized NES, appears to be responsible for its export from the nucleus, bound to the influenza virus RNA (3).We have recently shown that RSV M localizes in the nucleus through a conventional nuclear import pathway dependent on the nuclear import receptor importin β1 (IMPβ1) and the guanine nucleotide-binding protein Ran (14). In the present study, we show for the first time that RSV M possesses a Crm1-dependent nuclear export pathway, based on experiments using the specific inhibitor leptomycin B (LMB) (25), both in RSV-infected cells and in green fluorescent protein (GFP)-M fusion protein-expressing transfected cells. We use truncated and point-mutated M derivatives to map the Crm1-recognized NES within the M sequence and show that Crm1-dependent nuclear export is critical to the RSV infectious cycle, since LMB treatment early in infection, inhibiting M export from the nucleus, reduces RSV virion production and a recombinant RSV carrying a NES mutation in M was unable to replicate, probably because M deficient in nuclear export could not localize to areas of virus assembly, as shown in RSV-infected cells transfected to express GFP-M. This is the first report of a Crm1-mediated nuclear export pathway for a paramyxovirus M protein, with implications for the trafficking and function of other paramyxovirus M proteins.     

Palmitoylation of the Influenza A Virus M2 Protein Is Not Required for Virus Replication In Vitro but Contributes to Virus Virulence

The influenza A virus M2 protein has important roles during virus entry and in the assembly of infectious virus particles. The cytoplasmic tail of the protein can be palmitoylated at a cysteine residue, but this residue is not conserved in a number of human influenza A virus isolates. Recombinant viruses encoding M2 proteins with a serine substituted for the cysteine at position 50 were generated in the A/WSN/33 (H1N1) and A/Udorn/72 (H3N2) genetic backgrounds. The recombinant viruses were not attenuated for replication in MDCK cells, Calu-3 cells, or in primary differentiated murine trachea epithelial cell cultures, indicating there was no significant contribution of M2 palmitoylation to virus replication in vitro. The A/WSN/33 M2C50S virus displayed a slightly reduced virulence after infection of mice, suggesting that there may be novel functions for M2 palmitoylation during in vivo infection.Influenza A virus is a member of the Orthomyxoviridae and contains a segmented, negative-sense RNA genome that codes for 10 or 11 proteins, depending upon the virus strain (11). The integral membrane protein M2 is the viral ion channel protein that is required during virus entry (29) and for the production of infectious virus particles (4, 10, 12, 13). The sequences responsible for the latter map to the cytoplasmic tail of the protein and overlap with a number of sites for posttranslational modification, which include palmitoylation and phosphorylation (7, 26, 31). Palmitoylation occurs on the cysteine present at amino acid 50 and is not required for ion channel activity of the M2 protein from A/Udorn/72 (H3N2) (7). Palmitoylation of M2 appeared to be dispensable for the production of infectious virus particles using a reassortant virus consisting of seven segments from an H3N8 subtype virus (A/Equine/Miami/63) and the M segment from an H1N1 subtype virus (A/Puerto Rico/8/34) (2). No studies examining the role of M2 palmitoylation in the context of a naturally occurring influenza A virus strain have been published to date.The significance of palmitoylation of the influenza A virus hemagglutinin (HA) protein can vary among virus strains. Palmitoylation of HA from an H7 and an H1 but not an H3 subtype is required for efficient membrane fusion (5, 24, 32), whereas palmitoylation of HA from an H3 but not an H1 subtype is required for virus assembly (5). An analysis of 3,532 sequences of influenza isolates from humans revealed that the M2 residue C50 is conserved in a strain-specific manner. A total of 2,602 of 2,610 H3N2 sequences code for a cysteine at this position; the cysteine, however, is conserved in only 330 of 1,051 H1N1 sequences (data not shown). A serine residue is substituted for cysteine in the majority of the H1N1 viruses that do not have a cytoplasmic palmitoylation site; the newly emerged 2009 H1N1 influenza A viruses, however, do have a cysteine at this position (3). The sequence alignment data are consistent with a strain-specific selective pressure to maintain the palmitoylation site on the M2 protein. Interestingly, other M2 cytoplasmic tail sequences display differential effects on infectious virus production, depending on the strain used (12).To investigate the role of M2 palmitoylation in influenza A virus replication, we substituted a serine for the cysteine residue at position 50 (C50S) of the M2 protein in two influenza A virus strains, A/Udorn/72 (H3N2) (rUdorn) and A/WSN/33 (H1N1) (rWSN). The resultant viruses were tested for their ability to replicate in tissue culture cells, and the mouse-adapted virus was tested for virulence in a mouse model of infection. Neither mutant virus showed any defect in virus replication in tissue culture cells, in differentiated murine primary trachea epithelial cells (mTEC), or in the lungs of infected mice. The viruses lacking a palmitoylation site, however, did have a modest reduction in virulence, suggesting that M2 palmitoylation is dispensable for in vitro replication but contributes to virus virulence in vivo.     

Intergenotypic Replacement of Lyssavirus Matrix Proteins Demonstrates the Role of Lyssavirus M Proteins in Intracellular Virus Accumulation

Lyssavirus assembly depends on the matrix protein (M). We compared lyssavirus M proteins from different genotypes for their ability to support assembly and egress of genotype 1 rabies virus (RABV). Transcomplementation of M-deficient RABV with M from European bat lyssavirus (EBLV) types 1 and 2 reduced the release of infectious virus. Stable introduction of the heterogenotypic M proteins into RABV led to chimeric viruses with reduced virus release and intracellular accumulation of virus genomes. Although the chimeras indicated genotype-specific evolution of M, rapid selection of a compensatory mutant suggested conserved mechanisms of lyssavirus assembly and the requirement for only few adaptive mutations to fit the heterogenotypic M to a RABV backbone. Whereas the compensatory mutant replicated to similar infectious titers as RABV M-expressing virus, ultrastructural analysis revealed that both nonadapted EBLV M chimeras and the compensatory mutant differed from RABV M expressing viruses in the lack of intracellular viruslike structures that are enveloped and accumulate in cisterna of the degranulated and dilated rough endoplasmic reticulum compartment. Moreover, all viruses were able to bud at the plasma membrane. Since the lack of the intracellular viruslike structures correlated with the type of M protein but not with the efficiency of virus release, we hypothesize that the M proteins of EBLV-1 and RABV differ in their target membranes for virus assembly. Although the biological function of intracellular assembly and accumulation of viruslike structures in the endoplasmic reticulum remain unclear, the observed differences could contribute to diverse host tropism or pathogenicity.Rabies virus (RABV) and rabies-related rhabdoviruses are classified to the lyssavirus genus (13). Among the lyssaviruses various genotypes have evolved with differences in host species tropism and pathogenicity. For instance, members of genotype 1 rabies viruses circulate in terrestrial mammals and in bats, whereas members of other genotypes, such as genotypes 5 and 6 (European bat lyssavirus types 1 and 2 [EBLV-1 and ELBV-2]), are mainly restricted to bats. Although EBLVs appear adapted to their bat reservoir hosts, they have retained the ability to infect terrestrial mammals including humans, as indicated by occasional infection of humans and terrestrial animals such as sheep, stone marten, or cats (9, 35, 42). These are typically dead end infections with no further spread in the new host species. Experimental infection of sheep indicated that EBLVs are less pathogenic than genotype 1 viruses in the heterologous host (1, 7, 46, 47).Although the replication potentials of various lyssaviruses appear different in a given host, the genome organization is highly conserved (11, 27), containing only five virus genes that are sequentially ordered as individual cistrons. Whereas the viral nucleoprotein N, phosphoprotein P, and large polymerase L are essential for RNA synthesis (8), the envelope components matrix protein M and glycoprotein G are required for virus release and virus infectivity, respectively (31, 32).Based on receptor binding and the apoptosis-inducing properties of the sole RABV surface antigen G, G protein has been designated as the major pathogenicity determinant of genotype 1 lyssaviruses (15, 33, 34). However, several examples for G-independent mechanisms of virus-cell interaction exist (2, 3, 6, 30, 41, 44, 45), some of which have been shown to be involved in escape from antiviral innate immune responses and to be important for virus replication in vivo.One viral protein that has been noticed as an important RABV pathogenicity determinant is the matrix protein M (12, 39). M is essential for virus assembly and release (32) and is able to support virus budding even in the absence of G (31). In addition, RABV M regulates viral RNA synthesis (14, 17) and has been described to contribute to TRAIL-dependent induction of apoptosis (25) and to mitochondrial dysfunction (18). Recently, the X-ray crystal structure analysis of M of genotype 2 Lagos bat lyssavirus demonstrated a high conservation of M structures within the rhabdovirus family, despite the lack of sequence conservation between the lyssavirus and vesiculovirus genera (19).With 92.3% identity, the amino acid sequences of lyssavirus M proteins are highly conserved within the lyssavirus genus (11) but also contain differences that either may reflect intragenotypic coevolution with other virus proteins or divergence caused by different host adaptation and/or pathogenicity. To analyze the compatibility of M proteins from bat lyssaviruses in a rabies virus genetic background, we tested the ability of EBLV M proteins to support RABV replication after transient complementation and in chimeric viruses. Replacement of RABV M with EBLV-1 M resulted in a strong decrease in infectious virus production, suggesting the presence of a rather high degree of genotype-specific constraints. Surprisingly, recovery of efficiently replicating virus was achieved after only three passages, indicating that minor changes in M or M-interacting proteins may restore full budding activity in the genotype 1 context. Moreover, none of the chimeric viruses, neither the inefficiently released chimeric viruses nor the efficiently released passaged mutant, was able to support intracytoplasmic budding of viruslike structures at membranes of the rough endoplasmic reticulum (rER). Intracellular accumulation of enveloped viruslike structures in the rER is a common phenomenon of several rabies and rabies-related viruses (36, 37) that was obviously lost in the chimeric viruses. The lack of intracellular virus assembly strongly suggests that EBLV-1 and RABV M differ in their cellular target membranes for virus assembly and budding.     

Characterization of Lassa Virus Glycoprotein Oligomerization and Influence of Cholesterol on Virus Replication

Mature glycoprotein spikes are inserted in the Lassa virus envelope and consist of the distal subunit GP-1, the transmembrane-spanning subunit GP-2, and the signal peptide, which originate from the precursor glycoprotein pre-GP-C by proteolytic processing. In this study, we analyzed the oligomeric structure of the viral surface glycoprotein. Chemical cross-linking studies of mature glycoprotein spikes from purified virus revealed the formation of trimers. Interestingly, sucrose density gradient analysis of cellularly expressed glycoprotein showed that in contrast to trimeric mature glycoprotein complexes, the noncleaved glycoprotein forms monomers and oligomers spanning a wide size range, indicating that maturation cleavage of GP by the cellular subtilase SKI-1/S1P is critical for formation of the correct oligomeric state. To shed light on a potential relation between cholesterol and GP trimer stability, we performed cholesterol depletion experiments. Although depletion of cholesterol had no effect on trimerization of the glycoprotein spike complex, our studies revealed that the cholesterol content of the viral envelope is important for the infectivity of Lassa virus. Analyses of the distribution of viral proteins in cholesterol-rich detergent-resistant membrane areas showed that Lassa virus buds from membrane areas other than those responsible for impaired infectivity due to cholesterol depletion of lipid rafts. Thus, derivation of the viral envelope from cholesterol-rich membrane areas is not a prerequisite for the impact of cholesterol on virus infectivity.Lassa virus (LASV) is a member of the family Arenaviridae, of which Lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus (LCMV) is the prototype. Arenaviruses comprise more than 20 species, divided into the Old World and New World virus complexes (19). The Old World arenaviruses include the human pathogenic LASV strains, Lujo virus, which was first identified in late 2008 and is associated with an unprecedented high case fatality rate in humans, the nonhuman pathogenic Ippy, Mobala, and Mopeia viruses, and the recently described Kodoko virus (10, 30, 49). The New World virus complex contains, among others, the South American hemorrhagic fever-causing viruses Junín virus, Machupo virus, Guanarito virus, Sabiá virus, and the recently discovered Chapare virus (22).Arenaviruses contain a bisegmented single-stranded RNA genome encoding the polymerase L, matrix protein Z, nucleoprotein NP, and glycoprotein GP. The bipartite ribonucleoprotein of LASV is surrounded by a lipid envelope derived from the plasma membrane of the host cell. The matrix protein Z has been identified as a major budding factor, which lines the interior of the viral lipid membrane, in which GP spikes are inserted (61, 75). The glycoprotein is synthesized as precursor protein pre-GP-C and is cotranslationally cleaved by signal peptidase into GP-C and the signal peptide, which exhibits unusual length, stability, and topology (3, 27, 28, 33, 70, 87). Moreover, the arenaviral signal peptide functions as trans-acting maturation factor (2, 26, 33). After processing by signal peptidase, GP-C of both New World and Old World arenaviruses is cleaved by the cellular subtilase subtilisin kexin isozyme-1/site-1 protease (SKI-1/S1P) into the distal subunit GP-1 and the membrane-anchored subunit GP-2 within the secretory pathway (5, 52, 63). For LCMV, it has been shown that GP-1 subunits are linked to each other by disulfide bonds and are noncovalently connected to GP-2 subunits (14, 24, 31). GP-1 is responsible for binding to the host cell receptor, while GP-2 mediates fusion between the virus envelope and the endosomal membrane at low pH due to a bipartite fusion peptide near the amino terminus (24, 36, 44). Sequence analysis of the LCMV GP-2 ectodomain revealed two heptad repeats that most likely form amphipathic helices important for this process (34, 86).In general, viral class I fusion proteins have triplets of α-helical structures in common, which contain heptad repeats (47, 73). In contrast, class II fusion proteins are characterized by β-sheets that form dimers in the prefusion status and trimers in the postfusion status (43). The class III fusion proteins are trimers that, unlike class I fusion proteins, were not proteolytically processed N-terminally of the fusion peptide, resulting in a fusion-active membrane-anchored subunit (39, 62). Previous studies with LCMV described a tetrameric organization of the glycoprotein spikes (14), while more recent data using a bacterially expressed truncated ectodomain of the LCMV GP-2 subunit pointed toward a trimeric spike structure (31). Due to these conflicting data regarding the oligomerization status of LCMV GP, it remains unclear to which class of fusion proteins the arenaviral glycoproteins belong.The state of oligomerization and the correct conformation of viral glycoproteins are crucial for membrane fusion during virus entry. The early steps of infection have been shown for several viruses to be dependent on the cholesterol content of the participating membranes (i.e., either the virus envelope or the host cell membrane) (4, 9, 15, 20, 21, 23, 40, 42, 53, 56, 76, 78, 79). In fact, it has been shown previously that entry of both LASV and LCMV is susceptible to cholesterol depletion of the target host cell membrane using methyl-β-cyclodextrin (MβCD) treatment (64, 71). Moreover, cholesterol not only plays an important role in the early steps during entry in the viral life cycle but also is critical in the virus assembly and release process. Several viruses of various families, including influenza virus, human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1), measles virus, and Ebola virus, use the ordered environment of lipid raft microdomains. Due to their high levels of glycosphingolipids and cholesterol, these domains are characterized by insolubility in nonionic detergents under cold conditions (60, 72). Recent observations have suggested that budding of the New World arenavirus Junin virus occurs from detergent-soluble membrane areas (1). Assembly and release from distinct membrane microdomains that are detergent soluble have also been described for vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) (12, 38, 68). At present, however, it is not known whether LASV requires cholesterol in its viral envelope for successful virus entry or whether specific membrane microdomains are important for LASV assembly and release.In this study, we first investigated the oligomeric state of the premature and mature LASV glycoprotein complexes. Since it has been shown for several membrane proteins that the oligomerization and conformation are dependent on cholesterol (58, 59, 76, 78), we further analyzed the dependence of the cholesterol content of the virus envelope on glycoprotein oligomerization and virus infectivity. Finally, we characterized the lipid membrane areas from which LASV is released.     

The First Transmembrane Domain of the Hepatitis B Virus Large Envelope Protein Is Crucial for Infectivity

The early steps of the hepatitis B virus (HBV) life cycle are still poorly understood. Indeed, neither the virus receptor at the cell surface nor the mechanism by which nucleocapsids are delivered to the cytosol of infected cells has been identified. Extensive mutagenesis studies in pre-S1, pre-S2, and most of the S domain of envelope proteins revealed the presence of two regions essential for HBV infectivity: the 77 first residues of the pre-S1 domain and a conformational motif in the antigenic loop of the S domain. In addition, at the N-terminal extremity of the S domain, a putative fusion peptide, partially overlapping the first transmembrane (TM1) domain and preceded by a PEST sequence likely containing several proteolytic cleavage sites, was identified. Since no mutational analysis of these two motifs potentially implicated in the fusion process was performed, we decided to investigate the ability of viruses bearing contiguous deletions or substitutions in the putative fusion peptide and PEST sequence to infect HepaRG cells. By introducing the mutations either in the L and M proteins or in the S protein, we demonstrated the following: (i) that in the TM1 domain of the L protein, three hydrophobic clusters of four residues were necessary for infectivity; (ii) that the same clusters were critical for S protein expression; and, finally, (iii) that the PEST sequence was dispensable for both assembly and infection processes.The hepatitis B virus (HBV) is the main human pathogen responsible for severe hepatic diseases like cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. Even though infection can be prevented by immunization with an efficient vaccine, about 2 billion people have been infected worldwide, resulting in 350 million chronic carriers that are prone to develop liver diseases (56). Current treatments consist either of the use of interferon α, which modulates antiviral defenses and controls infection in 30 to 40% of cases, or of the use of viral polymerase inhibitors that allow a stronger response to treatment but require long-term utilization and frequently lead to the outcome of resistant viruses (34, 55). A better understanding of the virus life cycle, and particularly of the mechanism by which the virus enters the cell, could provide background for therapeutics that inhibit the early steps of infection, as recently illustrated with the HBV pre-S1-derived entry inhibitor (25, 45).HBV belongs to the Hepadnaviridae family whose members infect different species. All viruses of this family share common properties. The capsid containing a partially double-stranded circular DNA genome is surrounded by a lipid envelope, in which two (in avihepadnaviruses infecting birds) or three (in orthohepadnaviruses infecting mammals) envelope proteins are embedded. A single open reading frame bearing several translation initiation sites encodes these surface proteins. Thus, the HBV envelope contains three proteins: S, M, and L that share the same C-terminal extremity corresponding to the small S protein that is crucial for virus assembly (7, 8, 46) and infectivity (1, 31, 53). These proteins are synthesized in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), assembled, and secreted as particles through the Golgi apparatus (15, 42). The current model for the transmembrane structure of the S domain implies the luminal exposition of both N- and C-terminal extremities and the presence of four transmembrane (TM) domains: the TM1 and TM2 domains, both necessary for cotranslational protein integration into the ER membrane, and the TM3 and TM4 domains, located in the C-terminal third of the S domain (for a review, see reference 6). Among the four predicted TM domains, only the TM2 domain has a defined position between amino acids 80 and 98 of the S domain. The exact localization of the TM1 domain is still unclear, probably because of the relatively low hydrophobicity of its sequence, which contains polar residues and two prolines. The M protein corresponds to the S protein extended by an N-terminal domain of 55 amino acids called pre-S2. Its presence is dispensable for both assembly and infectivity (20, 21, 37). Finally, the L protein corresponds to the M protein extended by an N-terminal domain of 108 amino acids called pre-S1 (genotype D). The pre-S1 and pre-S2 domains of the L protein can be present either at the inner face of viral particles (on the cytoplasmic side of the ER), playing a crucial role in virus assembly (5, 8, 10, 11, 46), or on the outer face (on the luminal side of the ER), available for the interaction with target cells and necessary for viral infectivity (4, 14, 36). The pre-S translocation is independent from the M and S proteins and is driven by the L protein TM2 domain (33). Finally, HBV surface proteins are not only incorporated into virion envelopes but also spontaneously bud from ER-Golgi intermediate compartment membranes (30, 43) to form empty subviral particles (SVPs) that are released from the cell by secretion (8, 40).One approach to decipher viral entry is to interfere with the function of envelope proteins. Thus, by a mutagenesis approach, two envelope protein domains crucial for HBV infectivity have already been identified: (i) the 77 first amino acids of the pre-S1 domain (4, 36) including the myristic acid at the N-terminal extremity (9, 27) and (ii) possibly a cysteine motif in the luminal loop of the S domain (1, 31). In addition, a putative fusion peptide has been identified at the N-terminal extremity of the S domain due to its sequence homology with other viral fusion peptides (50). This sequence, either N-terminal in the S protein or internal in the L and M proteins, is conserved among the Hepadnaviridae family and shares common structural and functional properties with other fusion peptides (49, 50). Finally, a PEST sequence likely containing several proteolytic cleavage sites has been identified in the L and M proteins upstream of the TM1 domain (39). A cleavage within this sequence could activate the fusion peptide.In this study, we investigated whether the putative fusion peptide and the PEST sequence were necessary for the infection process. For this purpose, we constructed a set of mutant viruses bearing contiguous deletions in these regions and determined their infectivity using an in vitro infection model based on HepaRG cells (28). The introduction of mutations either in the L and M proteins or in only the S protein allowed us to demonstrate that, in the TM1 domain of L protein, three hydrophobic clusters not essential for viral assembly were crucial for HBV infectivity while their presence in the S protein was critical for envelope protein expression. In addition, we showed that the PEST sequence was clearly dispensable for both assembly and infection processes.     

The African Swine Fever Virus Virion Membrane Protein pE248R Is Required for Virus Infectivity and an Early Postentry Event

The African swine fever virus (ASFV) protein pE248R, encoded by the gene E248R, is a late structural component of the virus particle. The protein contains intramolecular disulfide bonds and has been previously identified as a substrate of the ASFV-encoded redox system. Its amino acid sequence contains a putative myristoylation site and a hydrophobic transmembrane region near its carboxy terminus. We show here that the protein pE248R is myristoylated during infection and associates with the membrane fraction in infected cells, behaving as an integral membrane protein. Furthermore, the protein localizes at the inner envelope of the virus particles in the cytoplasmic factories. The function of the protein pE248R in ASFV replication was investigated by using a recombinant virus that inducibly expresses the gene E248R. Under repressive conditions, the ASFV polyproteins pp220 and pp62 are normally processed and virus particles with morphology indistinguishable from that of those produced in a wild-type infection or under permissive conditions are generated. Moreover, the mutant virus particles can exit the cell as does the parental virus. However, the infectivity of the pE248R-deficient virions was reduced at least 100-fold. An investigation of the defect of the mutant virus indicated that neither virus binding nor internalization was affected by the absence of the protein pE248R, but a cytopathic effect was not induced and early and late gene expression was impaired, indicating that the protein is required for some early postentry event.African swine fever virus (ASFV) is a large enveloped deoxyvirus that causes a severe hemorrhagic disease in domestic pigs (38). The ASFV genome is a double-stranded DNA molecule of 170 to 190 kbp that encodes more than 150 polypeptides (47). The icosahedral virus particle contains more than 50 polypeptides and is composed of several concentric domains, including an internal DNA-containing nucleoid surrounded by a protein layer designated the core shell, an inner envelope, and an outer icosahedral capsid (8, 10, 20). An additional membrane acquired by budding through the plasma membrane envelops the extracellular virion (14).The complex process of virus assembly occurs at specialized cytoplasmic sites, designated viral factories, and is initiated by the recruitment and modification of endoplasmic reticulum (ER) cisternae, which collapse to form the virus inner envelope, where the viral membrane proteins p54 and p17 are localized (8, 16, 21, 32, 37). This model, however, has been recently questioned, and based on data obtained using samples prepared by high-pressure freezing, it has been suggested that the inner envelope of ASFV consists of a single lipid bilayer (28). The icosahedral capsid layer, formed by protein p72, is then progressively assembled on one side of this envelope, while on the other side, the core shell domain, mainly constituted by the processing products of the polyproteins pp220 and pp62, is simultaneously constructed (6, 7, 20, 26). Finally, the viral DNA and nucleoproteins are packaged and condensed to form the nucleoid (15).The functions of several virus proteins in the formation of the different domains of the virus particle have been investigated in recent years. Thus, the structural proteins p72 and pB438L and the nonstructural pB602L protein, described as a chaperone of p72 (22), have been shown to be required for the construction of the icosahedral capsid (24, 25, 26), while the polyprotein pp220 is essential for the formation of the inner core, constituted by the nucleoid and core shell domains (7). It has also been demonstrated that the processing of the polyproteins pp220 and pp62 by the virus-encoded protease is necessary for the assembly of a proper core (5). In addition, it is known that the transmembrane protein p54 is critical for the recruitment of envelope precursors to assembly sites (35), although the mechanisms underlying the conversion of ER cisternae into functional viral envelopes are mostly unknown. Studies of other transmembrane proteins detected as structural components of the virus particle could shed light on this matter. Some of the virion membrane proteins could also play a role in virus entry, as has been described for the proteins p12, identified as a viral attachment protein (11, 19), and p54, also involved in binding of virus to target cells (27).The ASFV protein pE248R is a late structural component of the virus particle (33) that belongs to a class of myristoylated membrane proteins related to vaccinia virus L1 (30), one of the substrates of the pathway for the formation of disulfide bonds encoded by this virus (41). The protein pE248R also contains intramolecular disulfide bridges and has been recently identified as a possible final substrate of the ASFV-encoded redox system (33). In the present study, we investigated the membrane association, the localization in the virion, and the role of the protein pE248R in ASFV replication. Our results indicate that pE248R is a myristoylated integral membrane protein localized at the inner envelope of the virus particle. By using a conditional lethal ASFV mutant, vE248Ri, with an inducible copy of the gene E248R, we showed that the protein pE248R is required for virus infectivity and an early postentry event but not virus assembly.