Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1 Glycoprotein E Mediates Retrograde Spread from Epithelial Cells to Neurites

In animal models of infection, glycoprotein E (gE) is required for efficient herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) spread from the inoculation site to the cell bodies of innervating neurons (retrograde direction). Retrograde spread in vivo is a multistep process, in that HSV-1 first spreads between epithelial cells at the inoculation site, then infects neurites, and finally travels by retrograde axonal transport to the neuron cell body. To better understand the role of gE in retrograde spread, we used a compartmentalized neuron culture system, in which neurons were infected in the presence or absence of epithelial cells. We found that gE-deleted HSV-1 (NS-gEnull) retained retrograde axonal transport activity when added directly to neurites, in contrast to the retrograde spread defect of this virus in animals. To better mimic the in vivo milieu, we overlaid neurites with epithelial cells prior to infection. In this modified system, virus infects epithelial cells and then spreads to neurites, revealing a 100-fold retrograde spread defect for NS-gEnull. We measured the retrograde spread defect of NS-gEnull from a variety of epithelial cell lines and found that the magnitude of the spread defect from epithelial cells to neurons correlated with epithelial cell plaque size defect, indicating that gE plays a similar role in both types of spread. Therefore, gE-mediated spread between epithelial cells and neurites likely explains the retrograde spread defect of gE-deleted HSV-1 in vivo.Herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) is an alphaherpesvirus that characteristically infects skin and mucosal surfaces before spreading to sensory neurons, where it establishes a lifelong persistent infection. The virus periodically returns to the periphery via sensory axons and causes recurrent lesions as well as asymptomatic shedding. This life cycle requires viral transport along axons in two directions: toward the neuron cell body (retrograde direction) and away from the neuron cell body (anterograde direction).Many studies of alphaherpesvirus neuronal spread have focused on pseudorabies virus (PRV), a virus whose natural host is the pig. Three PRV proteins, glycoprotein E (gE), gI, and Us9, have been shown to mediate anterograde neuronal spread both in animal models of infection and in cultured neurons. However, these three proteins are dispensable for retrograde spread (3, 8, 11, 12, 31, 46). In contrast, numerous animal models of infection have shown that HSV-1 gE is required for retrograde spread from the inoculation site to the cell bodies of innervating neurons (4, 9, 44, 56). In the murine flank model, wild-type (WT) virus replicates in the skin and then infects sensory neurons and spreads in a retrograde direction to the dorsal root ganglia (DRG). In this model, gE-deleted HSV-1 replicates in the skin but is not detected in the DRG (9, 44). This phenotype differs from gE-deleted PRV, which is able to reach the DRG at WT levels (8). Thus, unlike PRV, gE-deleted HSV-1 viruses have a retrograde spread defect in vivo.HSV-1 gE is a 552-amino-acid type I membrane protein found in the virion membrane as well as in the trans-Golgi and plasma membranes of infected cells (1). gE forms a heterodimer with another viral glycoprotein, gI. The gE/gI complex is important for HSV-1 immune evasion through its Fc receptor activity. gE/gI binds to the Fc domain of antibodies directed against other viral proteins, sequestering these antibodies and blocking antibody effector functions (27, 32, 40). Additionally, gE/gI promotes spread between epithelial cells. Viruses lacking either gE or gI form characteristically small plaques in cell culture and small inoculation site lesions in mice (4, 9, 18, 40, 58). In animal models, gE and gI also mediate viral spread in both anterograde and retrograde directions (4, 19, 44, 56).In order to better understand the role of gE in HSV-1 retrograde neuronal spread, we employed a compartmentalized neuron culture system that has been used to study directional neuronal spread of PRV and West Nile virus (12, 14, 45). In the Campenot chamber system, neurites are contained in a compartment that is separate from their corresponding cell bodies. Therefore, spread in an exclusively retrograde direction can be measured by infecting neurites and detecting spread to neuron cell bodies.HSV-1 replication requires retrograde transport of incoming viral genomes to the nucleus. In neurites, fusion between viral and cellular membranes occurs at the plasma membrane (43, 48). Upon membrane fusion, the capsid and a subset of tegument proteins (the inner tegument) dissociate from glycoproteins and outer tegument proteins, which remain at the plasma membrane (28, 38). Unenveloped capsids and the associated inner tegument proteins are then transported in the retrograde direction to the nucleus (7, 48, 49).For both neurons and epithelial cells, retrograde transport is dependent upon microtubules, ATP, the retrograde microtubule motor dynein, and the dynein cofactor dynactin (22, 34, 49, 52). Several viral proteins interact with components of the dynein motor complex (23, 39, 60). However, none of these proteins suggest a completely satisfactory mechanism by which viral retrograde transport occurs, either because they are not components of the complex that is transported to the nucleus (UL34, UL9, VP11/12) or because capsids lacking that protein retain retrograde transport activity (VP26) (2, 17, 21, 28, 37). This implies that additional viral proteins are involved in retrograde trafficking.We sought to better characterize the role of gE in retrograde spread and found that gE is dispensable for retrograde axonal transport; however, it promotes HSV-1 spread from epithelial cells to neurites. This epithelial cell-to-neuron spread defect provides a plausible explanation for the retrograde spread defect of gE-deleted HSV-1 in animal models of infection.     

A Human Cytomegalovirus gO-Null Mutant Fails To Incorporate gH/gL into the Virion Envelope and Is Unable To Enter Fibroblasts and Epithelial and Endothelial Cells

Human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) depends upon a five-protein complex, gH/gL/UL128-131, to enter epithelial and endothelial cells. A separate HCMV gH/gL-containing complex, gH/gL/gO, has been described. Our prevailing model is that gH/gL/UL128-131 is required for entry into biologically important epithelial and endothelial cells and that gH/gL/gO is required for infection of fibroblasts. Genes encoding UL128-131 are rapidly mutated during laboratory propagation of HCMV on fibroblasts, apparently related to selective pressure for the fibroblast entry pathway. Arguing against this model in the accompanying paper by B. J. Ryckman et al. (J. Virol., 84:2597-2609, 2010), we describe evidence that clinical HCMV strain TR expresses a gO molecule that acts to promote endoplasmic reticulum (ER) export of gH/gL and that gO is not stably incorporated into the virus envelope. This was different from results involving fibroblast-adapted HCMV strain AD169, which incorporates gO into the virion envelope. Here, we constructed a TR gO-null mutant, TRΔgO, that replicated to low titers, spread poorly among fibroblasts, but produced normal quantities of extracellular virus particles. TRΔgO particles released from fibroblasts failed to infect fibroblasts and epithelial and endothelial cells, but the chemical fusogen polyethylene glycol (PEG) could partially overcome defects in infection. Therefore, TRΔgO is defective for entry into all three cell types. Defects in entry were explained by observations showing that TRΔgO incorporated about 5% of the quantities of gH/gL in extracellular virus particles compared with that in wild-type virions. Although TRΔgO particles could not enter cells, cell-to-cell spread involving epithelial and endothelial cells was increased relative to TR, apparently resulting from increased quantities of gH/gL/UL128-131 in virions. Together, our data suggest that TR gO acts as a chaperone to promote ER export and the incorporation of gH/gL complexes into the HCMV envelope. Moreover, these data suggest that it is gH/gL, and not gH/gL/gO, that is present in virions and is required for infection of fibroblasts and epithelial and endothelial cells. Our observations that both gH/gL and gH/gL/UL128-131 are required for entry into epithelial/endothelial cells differ from models for other beta- and gammaherpesviruses that use one of two different gH/gL complexes to enter different cells.Human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) infects a broad spectrum of cell types in vivo, including epithelial and endothelial cells, fibroblasts, monocyte-macrophages, dendritic cells, hepatocytes, neurons, glial cells, and leukocytes (6, 28, 36). Infection of this diverse spectrum of cell types contributes to the multiplicity of CMV-associated disease. HCMV infection of hepatocytes and epithelial cells in the gut and lungs following transplant immunosuppression is directly associated with CMV disease (3, 44). HCMV can be transported in the blood by monocyte-macrophages, and virus produced in these cells can infect endothelial cells, leading to virus spread into solid tissues such as the brain, liver, and lungs, etc. (16). Despite the broad spectrum of cells infected in vivo, propagation of HCMV in the laboratory is largely limited to normal human fibroblasts because other cells produce little virus. HCMV rapidly adapts to laboratory propagation in fibroblasts, losing the capacity to infect other cell types, i.e., epithelial and endothelial cells and monocyte-macrophages (9, 16, 18, 43). This adaptation to fibroblasts involves mutations in the unique long b′ (ULb′) region of the HCMV genome, which includes 22 genes (9). Targeted mutation of three of the ULb′ genes, UL128, UL130, and UL131, abolished HCMV infection of endothelial cells, transmission to leukocytes, and infection of dendritic cells (17, 18). Restoration of UL128-131 genes in HCMV laboratory strain AD169 (which cannot infect epithelial and endothelial cells) produced viruses capable of infecting these cells (18, 48). There is also evidence that the UL128-131 proteins are deleterious to HCMV replication in fibroblasts, resulting in rapid loss or mutation of one or more of the UL128-131 genes during passage in fibroblasts (2).A major step forward in understanding how the UL128-131 genes promote HCMV infection of epithelial and endothelial cells involved observations that the UL128-131 proteins assemble onto the extracellular domain of the membrane-anchored HCMV glycoprotein heterodimer gH/gL (1, 49). Antibodies to UL128, UL130, and UL131 each neutralized HCMV for infection of endothelial or epithelial cells (1, 49). All herpesviruses express gH/gL homologues and, where this has been tested, all depend upon gH/gL for replication and, more specifically, for entry into cells (14, 15, 31, 38). Indeed, we showed that the gH/gL/UL128-131 complex mediated entry into epithelial and endothelial cells (40). All five members of the gH/gL/UL128-131 complex were required for proper assembly and export from the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and for function (39, 41). In addition, the expression of gH/gL/UL128-131, but not gH/gL or gB, in epithelial cells interfered with HCMV entry into these cells (39). This interference suggested that there are saturable gH/gL/UL128-131 receptors present on epithelial cells, molecules that HCMV uses for entry. There was no interference in fibroblasts expressing gH/gL/UL128-131, although some interference was observed with gH/gL (39). As noted above, gH/gL/UL128-131 plays no obvious role in entry into fibroblasts and, in fact, appears to be deleterious in this respect (2, 18, 40).HCMV also expresses a second gH/gL complex, as follows: gH/gL/gO (20, 21, 22, 30, 48). Fibroblast-adapted HCMV strain AD169 expresses a gO protein that is a 110- to 125-kDa glycoprotein (21). Pulse-chase studies suggest that gH/gL assembles first in the ER before binding and forming disulfide links with gO (21, 22). The 220-kDa immature gH/gL/gO complex is transported from the ER to the Golgi apparatus and increases in size to ∼280 to 300 kDa before incorporation into the virion envelope (21). gH/gL/gO complexes are apparently distinct from gH/gL/UL128-131 complexes because gO-specific antibodies do not detect complexes containing either UL128 or UL130 and UL128-specific antibodies do not precipitate gO (49). Towne and AD169 gO-null mutant laboratory strains can produce small plaques on fibroblasts, leading to the conclusion that gO is not essential. However, the AD169 and Towne mutants produced ∼1,000-fold less infectious virus than wild-type HCMV (14, 19), which might also be interpreted to mean that gO is very important or even essential for replication. Thus, the prevailing model has been that wild-type HCMV particles contain the following two gH/gL complexes: gH/gL/gO, which promotes infection of fibroblasts, and gH/gL/UL128-131, which promotes entry into epithelial and endothelial cells. Supporting this model, there are two different entry mechanisms, as follows: HCMV enters fibroblasts by fusion at the plasma membrane at neutral pH (12), whereas entry into epithelial and endothelial cells involves endocytosis and a low pH-dependent fusion with endosomes (40). This model of HCMV entry parallels models for Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) entry that use gH/gL to enter epithelial cells and gH/gL/gp42 to enter B cells (24). Similarly, HHV-6 uses gH/gL/gO and gH/gL/gQ, which bind to different receptors (33).Many of the studies of gH/gL/gO have involved the fibroblast-adapted HCMV strain AD169, which fails to express UL131 and assemble gH/gL/UL128-131 or AD169 recombinants in which UL131 expression was restored (20, 21, 22, 48, 49). It seemed possible that the adaptation of AD169 to long-term passage in fibroblasts might also involve alterations in gO. HCMV gO is unusually variable (15 to 25% amino acid differences) among different HCMV strains compared with other viral genes (13, 34, 35, 37, 46). In recent studies, Jiang et al. (26) described a gO-null mutant derived from the HCMV strain TB40/E, a strain that can infect endothelial cells following extensive passage on these cells. The TB40/E gO-null mutant spread poorly on fibroblasts compared with wild-type TB40/E, and there was little infectious virus detected in fibroblast culture supernatants. However, the few TB40/E gO-null mutant particles produced by fibroblasts that could initiate infection of endothelial cells were able to spread to form normal-sized plaques on endothelial cells. These results further supported the model for which gH/gL/gO is required for infection of fibroblasts but not for epithelial/endothelial cells. Those authors also concluded that gO is important for the assembly of enveloped particles in fibroblasts, based on observations of few infectious virus particles in supernatants and cytoplasmic accumulation of unenveloped capsids (26).Our studies of gH/gL/UL128-131 have involved the clinical HCMV strain TR (39, 40, 41, 47). HCMV TR was originally an ocular isolate from an AIDS patient (45) and was passaged only a few times on fibroblasts before being genetically frozen in the form of a bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) (34, 40). HCMV TR infects epithelial and endothelial cells (40) and monocyte-macrophages (D. Streblow and J. Nelson, unpublished results) well. In the accompanying paper (42), we characterized the biochemistry and intracellular trafficking of TR gO. TR gO expressed either in TR-infected cells or by using adenovirus vectors (expressed without other HCMV proteins) was largely retained in the ER. Coexpression of gO with gH/gL promoted transport of gH/gL beyond the ER. Importantly, TR gO was not found in extracellular virions. In contrast, AD169 gO was present in extracellular virus particles, as described previously (20, 21). We concluded that TR gO is a chaperone that promotes ER export of the gH/gL complex, but gO dissociates prior to incorporation into the virus envelope. Moreover, these differences highlight major differences between gO molecules expressed by fibroblast-adapted strain AD169 and low-passage TR.To extend these results and characterize how TR gO functions, whether in virus entry or virus assembly/egress, we constructed a TR gO-null mutant. TRΔgO exhibited major defects in entering fibroblasts, as evidenced by increased virus infection following treatment with the chemical fusogen polyethylene glycol (PEG). Unexpectedly, the mutant also failed to enter epithelial and endothelial cells, and again, PEG partially restored entry. Relatively normal numbers of TRΔgO particles were produced and released into cell culture supernatants, although even with PEG treatment, most of these virus particles remained defective in initiating immediate-early HCMV protein synthesis. Western blot analyses of TRΔgO extracellular particles demonstrated very low levels of gH/gL incorporated into virions, which likely explains the reduced entry of TRΔgO. However, the small amounts of gH/gL complexes that were present in TRΔgO virions were associated with increased quantities of UL130, and these TRΔgO particles spread better than wild-type HCMV on epithelial cell monolayers. Together with the results shown in the accompanying paper (42), we concluded that HCMV TR gO functions as a chaperone to promote ER export of gH/gL to HCMV assembly compartments and the incorporation of gH/gL into the virion envelope. The highly reduced quantities of gH/gL in virions are apparently responsible for the inability of HCMV to enter fibroblasts and epithelial and endothelial cells. These results suggest a modified version of our model, in which gH/gL, not gH/gL/gO, mediates entry into fibroblasts and both gH/gL and gH/gL/UL128-131 are required for entry into epithelial and endothelial cells.     

gp340 Promotes Transcytosis of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 in Genital Tract-Derived Cell Lines and Primary Endocervical Tissue

The human scavenger receptor gp340 has been identified as a binding protein for the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) envelope that is expressed on the cell surface of female genital tract epithelial cells. This interaction allows such epithelial cells to efficiently transmit infective virus to susceptible targets and maintain viral infectivity for several days. Within the context of vaginal transmission, HIV must first traverse a normally protective mucosa containing a cell barrier to reach the underlying T cells and dendritic cells, which propagate and spread the infection. The mechanism by which HIV-1 can bypass an otherwise healthy cellular barrier remains an important area of study. Here, we demonstrate that genital tract-derived cell lines and primary human endocervical tissue can support direct transcytosis of cell-free virus from the apical to basolateral surfaces. Further, this transport of virus can be blocked through the addition of antibodies or peptides that directly block the interaction of gp340 with the HIV-1 envelope, if added prior to viral pulsing on the apical side of the cell or tissue barrier. Our data support a role for the previously described heparan sulfate moieties in mediating this transcytosis but add gp340 as an important facilitator of HIV-1 transcytosis across genital tract tissue. This study demonstrates that HIV-1 actively traverses the protective barriers of the human genital tract and presents a second mechanism whereby gp340 can promote heterosexual transmission.Through correlative studies with macaques challenged with simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV), the initial targets of infection in nontraumatic vaginal exposure to human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) have been identified as subepithelial T cells and dendritic cells (DCs) (18, 23, 31, 36-38). While human transmission may differ from macaque transmission, the existing models of human transmission remain controversial. For the virus to successfully reach its CD4⁺ targets, HIV must first traverse the columnar mucosal epithelial cell barrier of the endocervix or uterus or the stratified squamous barrier of the vagina or ectocervix, whose normal functions include protection of underlying tissue from pathogens. This portion of the human innate immune defense system represents a significant impediment to transmission. Studies have placed the natural transmission rate of HIV per sexual act between 0.005 and 0.3% (17, 45). Breaks in the epithelial barrier caused by secondary infection with other sexual transmitted diseases or the normal physical trauma often associated with vaginal intercourse represent one potential means for viral exposure to submucosal cells and have been shown to significantly increase transmission (reviewed in reference 11). However, studies of nontraumatic exposure to SIV in macaques demonstrate that these disruptions are not necessary for successful transmission to healthy females. This disparity indicates that multiple mechanisms by which HIV-1 can pass through mucosal epithelium might exist in vivo. Identifying these mechanisms represents an important obstacle to understanding and ultimately preventing HIV transmission.Several host cellular receptors, including DC-specific intercellular adhesion molecule-grabbing integrin, galactosyl ceramide, mannose receptor, langerin, heparan sulfate proteoglycans (HSPGs), and chondroitin sulfate proteoglycans, have been identified that facilitate disease progression through binding of HIV virions without being required for fusion and infection (2, 3, 12, 14, 16, 25, 29, 30, 43, 46, 50). These host accessory proteins act predominately through glycosylation-based interactions between HIV envelope (Env) and the host cellular receptors. These different host accessory factors can lead to increased infectivity in cis and trans or can serve to concentrate and expose virus at sites relevant to furthering its spread within the body. The direct transcytosis of cell-free virus through primary genital epithelial cells and the human endometrial carcinoma cell line HEC1A has been described (7, 9); this is, in part, mediated by HSPGs (7). Within the HSPG family, the syndecans have been previously shown to facilitate trans infection of HIV in vitro through binding of a specific region of Env that is moderately conserved (7, 8). This report also demonstrates that while HSPGs mediate a portion of the viral transcytosis that occurs in these two cell types, a significant portion of the observed transport occurs through an HSPG-independent mechanism. Other host cell factors likely provide alternatives to HSPGs for HIV-1 to use in subverting the mucosal epithelial barrier.gp340 is a member of the scavenger receptor cysteine-rich (SRCR) family of innate immune receptors. Its numerous splice variants can be found as a secreted component of human saliva (34, 41, 42) and as a membrane-associated receptor in a large number of epithelial cell lineages (22, 32, 40). Its normal cellular function includes immune surveillance of bacteria (4-6, 44), interaction with influenza A virus (19, 20, 32, 51) and surfactant proteins in the lung (20, 22, 33), and facilitating epithelial cell regeneration at sites of cellular inflammation and damage (27, 32). The secreted form of gp340, salivary agglutinin (SAG), was identified as a component of saliva that inhibits HIV-1 transmission in the oral pharynx through a specific interaction with the viral envelope protein that serves to agglutinate the virus and target it for degradation (34, 35, 41). Interestingly, SAG was demonstrated to form a direct protein-protein interaction with HIV Env (53, 54). Later, a cell surface-associated variant of SAG called gp340 was characterized as a binding partner for HIV-1 in the female genital tract that could facilitate virus transmission to susceptible targets of infection (47) and as a macrophage-expressed enhancer of infection (10).     

Cdk5-Dependent Regulation of Rho Activity,Cytoskeletal Contraction,and Epithelial Cell Migration via Suppression of Src and p190RhoGAP

Cdk5 regulates adhesion and migration in a variety of cell types. We previously showed that Cdk5 is strongly activated during stress fiber formation and contraction in spreading cells. Here we determine the mechanism linking Cdk5 to stress fiber contractility and its relevance to cell migration. Immunofluorescence showed that Cdk5 colocalized with phosphorylated myosin regulatory light chain (pMRLC) on contracting stress fibers. Inhibiting Cdk5 activity by various means significantly reduced pMRLC level and cytoskeletal contraction, with loss of central stress fibers. Blocking Cdk5 activity also reduced Rho-Rho kinase (ROCK) signaling, which is the principal pathway of myosin phosphorylation under these conditions. Next, we examined the effect of Cdk5 activity on Src, a known regulator of Rho. Inhibiting Cdk5 activity increased Src activation and phosphorylation of its substrate, p190RhoGAP, an upstream inhibitor of Rho. Inhibiting both Cdk5 and Src activity completely reversed the effect of Cdk5 inhibition on Rho and prevented the loss of central stress fibers, demonstrating that Cdk5 exerts its effects on Rho-ROCK signaling by suppressing Src activity. Moreover, inhibiting either Cdk5 or ROCK activity increased cell migration to an equal extent, while inhibiting both kinases produced no additional effect, demonstrating that Cdk5-dependent regulation of ROCK activity is a physiological determinant of migration rate.Cell migration is essential for morphogenesis during embryonic development and for epithelial homeostasis and wound healing throughout life. As myosin II is involved in all aspects of cell migration, from cell polarization and adhesion to protrusion and tail retraction (34, 48), the signaling pathways regulating myosin-dependent cytoskeletal contraction are of particular interest. Myosin contraction is regulated by phosphorylation of myosin regulatory light chain (MRLC) at Thr18/Ser19. Although a number of kinases have been identified which phosphorylate these sites, the principal kinases in most cells are myosin light chain kinase (MLCK), a calcium/calmodulin-regulated enzyme, and Rho kinase (ROCK), a downstream effector of the Rho family GTPase RhoA. To provide the stringent control of cytoskeletal contraction needed for migration, RhoA is subject to both positive regulation by guanine nucleotide exchange factors (GEFs), such as GEF-H1 (4, 21), and negative regulation by GTPase-activating proteins (GAPs), such as the Src-regulated protein p190RhoGAP (1, 3, 10, 13). An additional level of regulation is provided by guanine nucleotide dissociation inhibitors, which bind to inactive RhoA and other Rho family GTPases, sequestering them in the cytosol (3). Two major downstream effectors of RhoA with regard to the cytoskeleton are the mammalian homologue of diaphanous, involved in actin polymerization (43), and ROCK, which phosphorylates MRLC and myosin phosphatase (20).Cdk5, a serine/threonine kinase, is an atypical member of the well-known family of cyclin-dependent kinases (Cdks). Unlike the other Cdks, it has no known function in cell cycle regulation and is activated by one of two noncyclin proteins, p35 or p39 (16, 41). Phosphorylation of Cdk5 at Y15 increases its activity severalfold (36, 49). Although Cdk5 is most abundant in neuronal cells, where it regulates migration, cytoskeletal dynamics, and membrane trafficking (37, 38, 45), a growing body of evidence indicates that Cdk5 has similar functions in nonneuronal cells (35). In particular, Cdk5 has been shown to strengthen cell-to-matrix adhesion and regulate migration in lens epithelial cells (28), corneal epithelial cells (11, 12, 40), keratinocytes (27), and CHO-K1 cells (15). The effects of Cdk5 on adhesion and migration have been linked, at least in part, to Cdk5-dependent phosphorylation of talin, which strengthens adhesion by slowing the rate of focal adhesion turnover (15). However, we have observed that Cdk5 not only binds to focal adhesions, where talin is located, but also to stress fibers (33). Moreover, in spreading cells, Cdk5 exerts its greatest effect on adhesion 1 to 2 h after plating (28), when stress fiber contraction is pronounced and Cdk5 activity is maximum (33). Therefore, we hypothesized that Cdk5 might regulate the MRLC phosphorylation necessary for stress fiber contraction and stability. To test this possibility, we examined the relationship of Cdk5 activity to MRLC phosphorylation and cytoskeletal contraction in spreading human lens epithelial cells.     

Protein Tyrosine Kinase 6 Directly Phosphorylates AKT and Promotes AKT Activation in Response to Epidermal Growth Factor

Protein tyrosine kinase 6 (PTK6) is a nonmyristoylated Src-related intracellular tyrosine kinase. Although not expressed in the normal mammary gland, PTK6 is expressed in a majority of human breast tumors examined, and it has been linked to ErbB receptor signaling and AKT activation. Here we demonstrate that AKT is a direct substrate of PTK6 and that AKT tyrosine residues 315 and 326 are phosphorylated by PTK6. Association of PTK6 with AKT occurs through the SH3 domain of PTK6 and is enhanced through SH2 domain-mediated interactions following tyrosine phosphorylation of AKT. Using Src, Yes, and Fyn null mouse embryonic fibroblasts (SYF cells), we show that PTK6 phosphorylates AKT in a Src family kinase-independent manner. Introduction of PTK6 into SYF cells sensitized these cells to physiological levels of epidermal growth factor (EGF) and increased AKT activation. Stable introduction of active PTK6 into SYF cells also resulted in increased proliferation. Knockdown of PTK6 in the BPH-1 human prostate epithelial cell line led to decreased AKT activation in response to EGF. Our data indicate that in addition to promoting growth factor receptor-mediated activation of AKT, PTK6 can directly activate AKT to promote oncogenic signaling.Protein tyrosine kinase 6 (PTK6; also known as the breast tumor kinase BRK) is an intracellular Src-related tyrosine kinase (9, 48). Human PTK6 was identified in cultured human melanocytes (32) and breast tumor cells (39), while its mouse orthologue was cloned from normal small intestinal epithelial cell RNA (50). Although PTK6 shares overall structural similarity with Src family tyrosine kinases, it lacks an N-terminal myristoylation consensus sequence for membrane targeting (39, 51). As a consequence, PTK6 is localized to different cellular compartments, including the nucleus (14, 15). PTK6 is expressed in normal differentiated epithelial cells of the gastrointestinal tract (34, 42, 51), prostate (14), and skin (51-53). Expression of PTK6 is upregulated in different types of cancers, including breast carcinomas (6, 39, 54), colon cancer (34), ovarian cancer (47), head and neck cancers (33), and metastatic melanoma cells (16). The significance of apparent opposing signaling roles for PTK6 in normal differentiation and cancer is still poorly understood.In human breast tumor cells, PTK6 enhances signaling from members of the ErbB receptor family (10, 29, 30, 36, 40, 49, 54). In the HB4a immortalized human mammary gland luminal epithelial cell line, PTK6 promoted epidermal growth factor (EGF)-induced ErbB3 tyrosine phosphorylation and AKT activation (29). In response to EGF stimulation, PTK6 promoted phosphorylation of the focal adhesion protein paxillin and Rac1-mediated cell migration (10). PTK6 can be activated by the ErbB3 ligand heregulin and promotes activation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase 5 (ERK5) and p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) in breast cancer cells (40). PTK6 can also phosphorylate p190RhoGAP-A and stimulate its activity, leading to RhoA inactivation and Ras activation and thereby promoting EGF-dependent breast cancer cell migration and proliferation (49). Expression of PTK6 has been correlated with ErbB2 expression in human breast cancers (4, 5, 54).AKT (also called protein kinase B) is a serine-threonine kinase that is activated downstream of growth factor receptors (38). It is a key player in signaling pathways that regulate energy metabolism, proliferation, and cell survival (7, 45). Aberrant activation of AKT through diverse mechanisms has been discovered in different cancers (2). AKT activation requires phosphorylation of AKT on threonine residue 308 and serine residue 473. The significance of phosphorylation of AKT on tyrosine residues is less well understood. Src has been shown to phosphorylate AKT on conserved tyrosine residues 315 and 326 near the activation loop (11). Substitution of these two tyrosine residues with phenylalanine abolished AKT kinase activity stimulated by EGF (11). Use of the Src family inhibitor PP2 impaired AKT activation following IGF-1 stimulation of oligodendrocytes (13). The RET/PTC receptor tyrosine kinase that responds to glial cell-line-derived neurotrophic factor also phosphorylated AKT tyrosine residue 315 promoting activation of AKT (28). AKT tyrosine residue 474 was phosphorylated when cells were treated with the tyrosine phosphatase inhibitor pervanadate, and phosphorylation of tyrosine 474 contributed to full activation of AKT (12). Recently, the nonreceptor tyrosine kinase Ack1 was shown to regulate AKT tyrosine phosphorylation and activation (37).Here we show that AKT is a cytoplasmic substrate of the intracellular tyrosine kinase PTK6. We identify the tyrosine residues on AKT that are targeted by PTK6, and we demonstrate that tyrosine phosphorylation plays a role in regulating association between PTK6 and AKT. In addition, we show that PTK6 promotes AKT activation and cell proliferation in a Src-independent manner.     

Isolation of Human Monoclonal Antibodies That Potently Neutralize Human Cytomegalovirus Infection by Targeting Different Epitopes on the gH/gL/UL128-131A Complex

Human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) is a widely circulating pathogen that causes severe disease in immunocompromised patients and infected fetuses. By immortalizing memory B cells from HCMV-immune donors, we isolated a panel of human monoclonal antibodies that neutralized at extremely low concentrations (90% inhibitory concentration [IC₉₀] values ranging from 5 to 200 pM) HCMV infection of endothelial, epithelial, and myeloid cells. With the single exception of an antibody that bound to a conserved epitope in the UL128 gene product, all other antibodies bound to conformational epitopes that required expression of two or more proteins of the gH/gL/UL128-131A complex. Antibodies against gB, gH, or gM/gN were also isolated and, albeit less potent, were able to neutralize infection of both endothelial-epithelial cells and fibroblasts. This study describes unusually potent neutralizing antibodies against HCMV that might be used for passive immunotherapy and identifies, through the use of such antibodies, novel antigenic targets in HCMV for the design of immunogens capable of eliciting previously unknown neutralizing antibody responses.Human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) is a member of the herpesvirus family which is widely distributed in the human population and can cause severe disease in immunocompromised patients and upon infection of the fetus. HCMV infection causes clinical disease in 75% of patients in the first year after transplantation (58), while primary maternal infection is a major cause of congenital birth defects including hearing loss and mental retardation (5, 33, 45). Because of the danger posed by this virus, development of an effective vaccine is considered of highest priority (51).HCMV infection requires initial interaction with the cell surface through binding to heparan sulfate proteoglycans (8) and possibly other surface receptors (12, 23, 64, 65). The virus displays a broad host cell range (24, 53), being able to infect several cell types such as endothelial cells, epithelial cells (including retinal cells), smooth muscle cells, fibroblasts, leukocytes, and dendritic cells (21, 37, 44, 54). Endothelial cell tropism has been regarded as a potential virulence factor that might influence the clinical course of infection (16, 55), whereas infection of leukocytes has been considered a mechanism of viral spread (17, 43, 44). Extensive propagation of HCMV laboratory strains in fibroblasts results in deletions or mutations of genes in the UL131A-128 locus (1, 18, 21, 36, 62, 63), which are associated with the loss of the ability to infect endothelial cells, epithelial cells, and leukocytes (15, 43, 55, 61). Consistent with this notion, mouse monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) to UL128 or UL130 block infection of epithelial and endothelial cells but not of fibroblasts (63). Recently, it has been shown that UL128, UL130, and UL131A assemble with gH and gL to form a five-protein complex (thereafter designated gH/gL/UL128-131A) that is an alternative to the previously described gCIII complex made of gH, gL, and gO (22, 28, 48, 63).In immunocompetent individuals T-cell and antibody responses efficiently control HCMV infection and reduce pathological consequences of maternal-fetal transmission (13, 67), although this is usually not sufficient to eradicate the virus. Albeit with controversial results, HCMV immunoglobulins (Igs) have been administered to transplant patients in association with immunosuppressive treatments for prophylaxis of HCMV disease (56, 57), and a recent report suggests that they may be effective in controlling congenital infection and preventing disease in newborns (32). These products are plasma derivatives with relatively low potency in vitro (46) and have to be administered by intravenous infusion at very high doses in order to deliver sufficient amounts of neutralizing antibodies (4, 9, 32, 56, 57, 66).The whole spectrum of antigens targeted by HCMV-neutralizing antibodies remains poorly characterized. Using specific immunoabsorption to recombinant antigens and neutralization assays using fibroblasts as model target cells, it was estimated that 40 to 70% of the serum neutralizing activity is directed against gB (6). Other studies described human neutralizing antibodies specific for gB, gH, or gM/gN viral glycoproteins (6, 14, 26, 29, 34, 41, 52, 60). Remarkably, we have recently shown that human sera exhibit a more-than-100-fold-higher potency in neutralizing infection of endothelial cells than infection of fibroblasts (20). Similarly, CMV hyperimmunoglobulins have on average 48-fold-higher neutralizing activities against epithelial cell entry than against fibroblast entry (10). However, epitopes that are targeted by the antibodies that comprise epithelial or endothelial cell-specific neutralizing activity of human immune sera remain unknown.In this study we report the isolation of a large panel of human monoclonal antibodies with extraordinarily high potency in neutralizing HCMV infection of endothelial and epithelial cells and myeloid cells. With the exception of a single antibody that recognized a conserved epitope of UL128, all other antibodies recognized conformational epitopes that required expression of two or more proteins of the gH/gL/UL128-131A complex.     

Viral Protein Determinants of Lassa Virus Entry and Release from Polarized Epithelial Cells

The epithelium plays a key role in the spread of Lassa virus. Transmission from rodents to humans occurs mainly via inhalation or ingestion of droplets, dust, or food contaminated with rodent urine. Here, we investigated Lassa virus infection in cultured epithelial cells and subsequent release of progeny viruses. We show that Lassa virus enters polarized Madin-Darby canine kidney (MDCK) cells mainly via the basolateral route, consistent with the basolateral localization of the cellular Lassa virus receptor α-dystroglycan. In contrast, progeny virus was efficiently released from the apical cell surface. Further, we determined the roles of the glycoprotein, matrix protein, and nucleoprotein in directed release of nascent virus. To do this, a virus-like-particle assay was developed in polarized MDCK cells based on the finding that, when expressed individually, both the glycoprotein GP and matrix protein Z form virus-like particles. We show that GP determines the apical release of Lassa virus from epithelial cells, presumably by recruiting the matrix protein Z to the site of virus assembly, which is in turn essential for nucleocapsid incorporation into virions.Lassa virus (LASV), a member of the family Arenaviridae, is a highly pathogenic agent causing hemorrhagic fever as a severe clinical manifestation. Arenaviruses are currently classified into more than 20 species, which are divided into the Old World and New World virus complexes (10). The Old World group includes the prototype lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus (LCMV) and the highly human-pathogenic viruses LASV and Lujo virus, as well as the nonpathogenic Ippy, Mobala, Mopeia, and Kodoko viruses (7, 21, 36). The New World virus complex contains among others, the hemorrhagic fever-associated Junín, Machupo, Guanarito, and Sabiá viruses and the recently discovered Chapare virus (14).With the exception of the New World virus Tacaribe virus, which was isolated from fruit bats, all arenaviruses have specific rodent species as their natural reservoirs. Rodents of the Mastomys natalensis species complex were identified as the natural host of LASV in certain countries in West Africa, including Sierra Leone, Nigeria, Guinea, and Liberia (26, 35, 49). An estimated 100,000 to 300,000 human LASV infections occur annually, of which approximately 30% result in illness, which can range from mild, flu-like symptoms to fulminant hemorrhagic fever with a mortality rate of about 16% of hospitalized cases (47, 48). Due to the severe or even fatal outcome of disease, unavailability of vaccine prophylaxis, and inadequate therapeutic treatment options, LASV is classified as a biosafety level 4 agent.The primary transmission route of LASV from its host to humans is by direct exposure to virus-containing urine, which may occur via the respiratory tract, through inhalation of infected particulates, or via ingestion of contaminated food (62). Moreover, hunting and preparation for consumption of rodents have also been identified as possible risk factors for rodent-to-human transmission of LASV (67). LASV is spread from human-to-human by contact with infectious body fluids or through nosocomial contaminations (22, 27). During the infection process, virus contacts the epithelial layers of the body and, after breaking through the epithelial tissue barrier, exploits dendritic cells for further dissemination (3, 15). It has been shown for LASV, as well as for other arenaviruses, that during the course of infection, infectious virus particles are released from epithelia into body fluids and urine (32, 45, 71).As epithelial layers play a pivotal role not only in initial virus infection but also in release of virus progeny during the early stages of infection, virus spread within the organism and virus release for further transmission, the polarity of entry and release from polarized epithelia has been studied extensively with various viruses. Virus entry in polarized cells is correlated with the apical or basolateral localization of the responsible virus receptor (24, 34, 68). Viruses that are transmitted through aerosols or surface contact with body fluids are generally thought to enter the epithelial barrier from the apical side, whereas virus infections due to injuries or transmission from animals'' bites and scratches enter epithelial cell layers from the basolateral side. Further, the spread of disease is also dependent on the directional release of the virus from epithelial cells. In general, basolateral virus budding is thought to cause systemic infections, whereas local infections are a result of viruses that are released predominantly from the apical side (69). Fitting with this model, budding of wild-type Sendai virus is restricted to the apical domain of polarized cells and causes a local respiratory infection, whereas systemic spread of a Sendai virus mutant could be attributed mainly to its bipolar virus release (66). The direction of entry and release can also be highly dependent on the type of tissue involved, as Sindbis and Semliki Forest viruses show differences in directed release in colon and thyroid gland cells (75). Similar differences in polarized virus release have also been shown for different members within a single virus family (59).In order to understand virus dissemination within the organism, it is of interest to determine on which side viruses enter and leave polarized epithelial cell layers. Here, we present data on directional LASV invasion into polarized MDCK cell culture and demonstrate a directional release of LASV from these cells. Furthermore, we have elucidated how Lassa virus proteins interact to direct budding and release of LASV progeny from epithelial cell layers.     

Virus Entry via the Alternative Coreceptors CCR3 and FPRL1 Differs by Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Subtype

Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infects target cells by binding to CD4 and a chemokine receptor, most commonly CCR5. CXCR4 is a frequent alternative coreceptor (CoR) in subtype B and D HIV-1 infection, but the importance of many other alternative CoRs remains elusive. We have analyzed HIV-1 envelope (Env) proteins from 66 individuals infected with the major subtypes of HIV-1 to determine if virus entry into highly permissive NP-2 cell lines expressing most known alternative CoRs differed by HIV-1 subtype. We also performed linear regression analysis to determine if virus entry via the major CoR CCR5 correlated with use of any alternative CoR and if this correlation differed by subtype. Virus pseudotyped with subtype B Env showed robust entry via CCR3 that was highly correlated with CCR5 entry efficiency. By contrast, viruses pseudotyped with subtype A and C Env proteins were able to use the recently described alternative CoR FPRL1 more efficiently than CCR3, and use of FPRL1 was correlated with CCR5 entry. Subtype D Env was unable to use either CCR3 or FPRL1 efficiently, a unique pattern of alternative CoR use. These results suggest that each subtype of circulating HIV-1 may be subject to somewhat different selective pressures for Env-mediated entry into target cells and suggest that CCR3 may be used as a surrogate CoR by subtype B while FPRL1 may be used as a surrogate CoR by subtypes A and C. These data may provide insight into development of resistance to CCR5-targeted entry inhibitors and alternative entry pathways for each HIV-1 subtype.Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infects target cells by binding first to CD4 and then to a coreceptor (CoR), of which C-C chemokine receptor 5 (CCR5) is the most common (6, 53). CXCR4 is an additional CoR for up to 50% of subtype B and D HIV-1 isolates at very late stages of disease (4, 7, 28, 35). Many other seven-membrane-spanning G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) have been identified as alternative CoRs when expressed on various target cell lines in vitro, including CCR1 (76, 79), CCR2b (24), CCR3 (3, 5, 17, 32, 60), CCR8 (18, 34, 38), GPR1 (27, 65), GPR15/BOB (22), CXCR5 (39), CXCR6/Bonzo/STRL33/TYMSTR (9, 22, 25, 45, 46), APJ (26), CMKLR1/ChemR23 (49, 62), FPLR1 (67, 68), RDC1 (66), and D6 (55). HIV-2 and simian immunodeficiency virus SIVmac isolates more frequently show expanded use of these alternative CoRs than HIV-1 isolates (12, 30, 51, 74), and evidence that alternative CoRs other than CXCR4 mediate infection of primary target cells by HIV-1 isolates is sparse (18, 30, 53, 81). Genetic deficiency in CCR5 expression is highly protective against HIV-1 transmission (21, 36), establishing CCR5 as the primary CoR. The importance of alternative CoRs other than CXCR4 has remained elusive despite many studies (1, 30, 70, 81). Expansion of CoR use from CCR5 to include CXCR4 is frequently associated with the ability to use additional alternative CoRs for viral entry (8, 16, 20, 63, 79) in most but not all studies (29, 33, 40, 77, 78). This finding suggests that the sequence changes in HIV-1 env required for use of CXCR4 as an additional or alternative CoR (14, 15, 31, 37, 41, 57) are likely to increase the potential to use other alternative CoRs.We have used the highly permissive NP-2/CD4 human glioma cell line developed by Soda et al. (69) to classify virus entry via the alternative CoRs CCR1, CCR3, CCR8, GPR1, CXCR6, APJ, CMKLR1/ChemR23, FPRL1, and CXCR4. Full-length molecular clones of 66 env genes from most prevalent HIV-1 subtypes were used to generate infectious virus pseudotypes expressing a luciferase reporter construct (19, 57). Two types of analysis were performed: the level of virus entry mediated by each alternative CoR and linear regression of entry mediated by CCR5 versus all other alternative CoRs. We thus were able to identify patterns of alternative CoR use that were subtype specific and to determine if use of any alternative CoR was correlated or independent of CCR5-mediated entry. The results obtained have implications for the evolution of env function, and the analyses revealed important differences between subtype B Env function and all other HIV-1 subtypes.     

Cultivation of Fastidious Bacteria by Viability Staining and Micromanipulation in a Soil Substrate Membrane System

Soil substrate membrane systems allow for microcultivation of fastidious soil bacteria as mixed microbial communities. We isolated established microcolonies from these membranes by using fluorescence viability staining and micromanipulation. This approach facilitated the recovery of diverse, novel isolates, including the recalcitrant bacterium Leifsonia xyli, a plant pathogen that has never been isolated outside the host.The majority of bacterial species have never been recovered in the laboratory (1, 14, 19, 24). In the last decade, novel cultivation approaches have successfully been used to recover “unculturables” from a diverse range of divisions (23, 25, 29). Most strategies have targeted marine environments (4, 23, 25, 32), but soil offers the potential for the investigation of vast numbers of undescribed species (20, 29). Rapid advances have been made toward culturing soil bacteria by reformulating and diluting traditional media, extending incubation times, and using alternative gelling agents (8, 21, 29).The soil substrate membrane system (SSMS) is a diffusion chamber approach that uses extracts from the soil of interest as the growth substrate, thereby mimicking the environment under investigation (12). The SSMS enriches for slow-growing oligophiles, a proportion of which are subsequently capable of growing on complex media (23, 25, 27, 30, 32). However, the SSMS results in mixed microbial communities, with the consequent difficulty in isolation of individual microcolonies for further characterization (10).Micromanipulation has been widely used for the isolation of specific cell morphotypes for downstream applications in molecular diagnostics or proteomics (5, 15). This simple technology offers the opportunity to select established microcolonies of a specific morphotype from the SSMS when combined with fluorescence visualization (3, 11). Here, we have combined the SSMS, fluorescence viability staining, and advanced micromanipulation for targeted isolation of viable, microcolony-forming soil bacteria.     

DivIC Stabilizes FtsL against RasP Cleavage

The essential cell division protein FtsL is a substrate of the intramembrane protease RasP. Using heterologous coexpression experiments, we show here that the division protein DivIC stabilizes FtsL against RasP cleavage. Degradation seems to be initiated upon accessibility of a cytosolic substrate recognition motif.Cell division in bacteria is a highly regulated process (1). The division site selection as well as assembly and disassembly of the divisome have to be strictly controlled (1, 4). Although the spatial control of the divisome is relatively well understood (2, 4, 14, 17), mechanisms governing the temporal control of division are still mainly elusive. Regulatory proteolysis was thought to be a potential modulatory mechanism (8, 9). The highly unstable division protein FtsL was shown to be rate limiting for division and would make an ideal candidate for a regulatory factor in the timing of bacterial cell division (7, 9). In Bacillus subtilis, FtsL is an essential protein of the membrane part of the divisome (5, 7, 8). It is necessary for the assembly of the membrane-spanning division proteins, and a knockout is lethal (8, 9, 12). We have previously reported that FtsL is a substrate of the intramembrane protease RasP (5).These findings raised the question of whether RasP can regulate cell division by cleaving FtsL from the division complex. In order to mimic the situation in which FtsL is bound to at least one of its interaction partners, we used a heterologous coexpression system in which we synthesized FtsL and DivIC. It has been reported before that DivIC and FtsL are intimate binding partners in various organisms (6, 9, 15, 21, 22, 26) and that FtsL and DivIC (together with DivIB) can form complexes even in the absence of the other divisome components (6, 21). We therefore asked whether RasP is able to cleave FtsL in the presence of its major interaction partner DivIC, which would argue for the possibility that RasP could cleave FtsL within a mature divisome. In contrast, if interaction with DivIC could stabilize FtsL against RasP cleavage, this result would bring such a model into question. An alternative option for the role of RasP might be the removal of FtsL from the membrane. It has been shown that divisome disassembly and prevention of reassembly are crucial to prevent minicell formation close to the new cell poles (3, 16).     

Analysis of the Viral Elements Required in the Nuclear Import of HIV-1 DNA

HIV-1 possesses an exquisite ability to infect cells independently from their cycling status by undergoing an active phase of nuclear import through the nuclear pore. This property has been ascribed to the presence of karyophilic elements present in viral nucleoprotein complexes, such as the matrix protein (MA); Vpr; the integrase (IN); and a cis-acting structure present in the newly synthesized DNA, the DNA flap. However, their role in nuclear import remains controversial at best. In the present study, we carried out a comprehensive analysis of the role of these elements in nuclear import in a comparison between several primary cell types, including stimulated lymphocytes, macrophages, and dendritic cells. We show that despite the fact that none of these elements is absolutely required for nuclear import, disruption of the central polypurine tract-central termination sequence (cPPT-CTS) clearly affects the kinetics of viral DNA entry into the nucleus. This effect is independent of the cell cycle status of the target cells and is observed in cycling as well as in nondividing primary cells, suggesting that nuclear import of viral DNA may occur similarly under both conditions. Nonetheless, this study indicates that other components are utilized along with the cPPT-CTS for an efficient entry of viral DNA into the nucleus.Lentiviruses display an exquisite ability to infect dividing and nondividing cells alike that is unequalled among Retroviridae. This property is thought to be due to the particular behavior or composition of the viral nucleoprotein complexes (NPCs) that are liberated into the cytoplasm of target cells upon virus-to-cell membrane fusion and that allow lentiviruses to traverse an intact nuclear membrane (17, 28, 29, 39, 52, 55, 67, 79). In the case of the human immunodeficiency type I virus (HIV-1), several studies over the years identified viral components of such structures with intrinsic karyophilic properties and thus perfect candidates for mediation of the passage of viral DNA (vDNA) through the nuclear pore: the matrix protein (MA); Vpr; the integrase (IN); and a three-stranded DNA flap, a structure present in neo-synthesized viral DNA, specified by the central polypurine tract-central termination sequence (cPPT-CTS). It is clear that these elements may mediate nuclear import directly or via the recruitment of the host''s proteins, and indeed, several cellular proteins have been found to influence HIV-1 infection during nuclear import, like the karyopherin α2 Rch1 (38); importin 7 (3, 30, 93); the transportin SR-2 (13, 20); or the nucleoporins Nup98 (27), Nup358/RANBP2, and Nup153 (13, 56).More recently, the capsid protein (CA), the main structural component of viral nucleoprotein complexes at least upon their cytoplasmic entry, has also been suggested to be involved in nuclear import or in postnuclear entry steps (14, 25, 74, 90, 92). Whether this is due to a role for CA in the shaping of viral nucleoprotein complexes or to a direct interaction between CA and proteins involved in nuclear import remains at present unknown.Despite a large number of reports, no single viral or cellular element has been described as absolutely necessary or sufficient to mediate lentiviral nuclear import, and important controversies as to the experimental evidences linking these elements to this step exist. For example, MA was among the first viral protein of HIV-1 described to be involved in nuclear import, and 2 transferable nuclear localization signals (NLSs) have been described to occur at its N and C termini (40). However, despite the fact that early studies indicated that the mutation of these NLSs perturbed HIV-1 nuclear import and infection specifically in nondividing cells, such as macrophages (86), these findings failed to be confirmed in more-recent studies (23, 33, 34, 57, 65, 75).Similarly, Vpr has been implicated by several studies of the nuclear import of HIV-1 DNA (1, 10, 21, 43, 45, 47, 64, 69, 72, 73, 85). Vpr does not possess classical NLSs, yet it displays a transferable nucleophilic activity when fused to heterologous proteins (49-51, 53, 77, 81) and has been shown to line onto the nuclear envelope (32, 36, 47, 51, 58), where it can truly facilitate the passage of the viral genome into the nucleus. However, the role of Vpr in this step remains controversial, as in some instances Vpr is not even required for viral replication in nondividing cells (1, 59).Conflicting results concerning the role of IN during HIV-1 nuclear import also exist. Indeed, several transferable NLSs have been described to occur in the catalytic core and the C-terminal DNA binding domains of IN, but for some of these, initial reports of nuclear entry defects (2, 9, 22, 46, 71) were later shown to result from defects at steps other than nuclear import (60, 62, 70, 83). These reports do not exclude a role for the remaining NLSs in IN during nuclear import, and they do not exclude the possibility that IN may mediate this step by associating with components of the cellular nuclear import machinery, such as importin alpha and beta (41), importin 7 (3, 30, 93, 98), and, more recently, transportin-SR2 (20).The central DNA flap, a structure present in lentiviruses and in at least 1 yeast retroelement (44), but not in other orthoretroviruses, has also been involved in the nuclear import of viral DNA (4, 6, 7, 31, 78, 84, 95, 96), and more recently, it has been proposed to provide a signal for viral nucleoprotein complexes uncoating in the proximity of the nuclear pore, with the consequence of providing a signal for import (8). However, various studies showed an absence or weakness of nuclear entry defects in viruses devoid of the DNA flap (24, 26, 44, 61).Overall, the importance of viral factors in HIV-1 nuclear import is still unclear. The discrepancies concerning the role of MA, IN, Vpr, and cPPT-CTS in HIV-1 nuclear import could in part be explained by their possible redundancy. To date, only one comprehensive study analyzed the role of these four viral potentially karyophilic elements together (91). This study showed that an HIV-1 chimera where these elements were either deleted or replaced by their murine leukemia virus (MLV) counterparts was, in spite of an important infectivity defect, still able to infect cycling and cell cycle-arrested cell lines to similar efficiencies. If this result indicated that the examined viral elements of HIV-1 were dispensable for the cell cycle independence of HIV, as infections proceeded equally in cycling and arrested cells, they did not prove that they were not required in nuclear import, because chimeras displayed a severe infectivity defect that precluded their comparison with the wild type (WT).Nuclear import and cell cycle independence may not be as simply linked as previously thought. On the one hand, there has been no formal demonstration that the passage through the nuclear pore, and thus nuclear import, is restricted to nondividing cells, and for what we know, this passage may be an obligatory step in HIV infection in all cells, irrespective of their cycling status. In support of this possibility, certain mutations in viral elements of HIV affect nuclear import in dividing as well as in nondividing cells (4, 6, 7, 31, 84, 95). On the other hand, cell cycle-independent infection may be a complex phenomenon that is made possible not only by the ability of viral DNA to traverse the nuclear membrane but also by its ability to cope with pre- and postnuclear entry events, as suggested by the phenotypes of certain CA mutants (74, 92).Given that the cellular environment plays an important role during the early steps of viral infection, we chose to analyze the role of the four karyophilic viral elements of HIV-1 during infection either alone or combined in a wide comparison between cells highly susceptible to infection and more-restrictive primary cell targets of HIV-1 in vivo, such as primary blood lymphocytes (PBLs), monocyte-derived macrophages (MDM), and dendritic cells (DCs).In this study, we show that an HIV-1-derived virus in which the 2 NLSs of MA are mutated and the IN, Vpr, and cPPT-CTS elements are removed displays no detectable nuclear import defect in HeLa cells independently of their cycling status. However, this mutant virus is partially impaired for nuclear entry in primary cells and more specifically in DCs and PBLs. We found that this partial defect is specified by the cPPT-CTS, while the 3 remaining elements seem to play no role in nuclear import. Thus, our study indicates that the central DNA flap specifies the most important role among the viral elements involved thus far in nuclear import. However, it also clearly indicates that the role played by the central DNA flap is not absolute and that its importance varies depending on the cell type, independently from the dividing status of the cell.