HIV-1的表型及其感染的细胞嗜性

HIV-1的表型分为合胞体诱导型(syncytium-inducing,SI)和非合胞体诱导型(non-syncytium-inducing,NSI)。依据所用辅助受体和感染靶细胞的不同,HIV-1又被分为R5、X4和R5X4型。R5和X4型病毒分别利用CCR5和CXCR4作为辅助受体,而R5X4型病毒可利用这两种辅助受体。在病毒的复制力、细胞嗜性以及合胞体诱导能力上,SI型与X4型病毒一致,NSI型与R5型病毒一致。在HIV-1感染过程中,疾病的发展伴随着病毒从NSI型向SI型、及R5型向X4型的转变。HIV-1的表型影响和决定着HIV-1的感染、传播及AIDS的疾病进程。HIV-1的表型和细胞嗜性主要由病毒gp120的V3区(特别是第11和25位的氨基酸)决定。V3区的氨基酸序列信息,将为预测HIV-1的表型,以及病毒感染后的疾病进程提供生物信息学的依据。     

Rhabdovirus-Based Vectors with Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 (HIV-1) Envelopes Display HIV-1-Like Tropism and Target Human Dendritic Cells

We describe replication-competent, vaccine strain-based rabies viruses (RVs) that lack their own single glycoprotein and express, instead, a chimeric RV-human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) envelope protein composed of the ectodomain and transmembrane domains of HIV-1 gp160 and the cytoplasmic domain of RV G. The envelope proteins from both X4 (NL4-3)- and R5X4 (89.6)-tropic HIV-1 strains were utilized. These recombinant viruses very closely mimicked an HIV-1- like tropism, as indicated by blocking experiments. Infection was inhibited by SDF-1 on cells expressing CD4 and CXCR4 for both viruses, whereas RANTES abolished infection of cells expressing CCR5 in addition to CD4 in studies of the RV expressing HIV-1(89.6) Env. In addition, preincubation with soluble CD4 or monoclonal antibodies directed against HIV-1 gp160 blocked the infectivity of both G-deficient viruses but did not affect the G-containing RVs. Our results also indicated that the G-deficient viruses expressing HIV-1 envelope protein, in contrast to wild-type RV but similar to HIV-1, enter cells by a pH-independent pathway. As observed for HIV-1, the surrogate viruses were able to target human peripheral blood mononuclear cells, macrophages, and immature and mature human dendritic cells (DC). Moreover, G-containing RV-based vectors also infected mature human DC, indicating that infection of these cells is also supported by RV G. The ability of RV-based vectors to infect professional antigen-presenting cells efficiently further emphasizes the potential use of recombinant RVs as vaccines.     

Determinants of Entry Cofactor Utilization and Tropism in a Dualtropic Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Primary Isolate

Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 strain 89.6 is a dualtropic isolate that replicates in macrophages and transformed T cells, and its envelope mediates CD4-dependent fusion and entry with CCR5, CXCR-4, and CCR3. To map determinants of cofactor utilization by 89.6 and determine the relationship between cofactor use and tropism, we analyzed recombinants generated between 89.6 and T-cell-tropic (HXB) or macrophage-tropic (JRFL) strains. These chimeras showed that regions of 89.6 env outside V3 through V5 determine CXCR-4 utilization and T-cell line tropism as well as CCR5 utilization and macrophage tropism. However, the 89.6 env V3 domain also conferred on HXB the ability to use CCR5 for fusion and entry but not the ability to establish productive macrophage infection. CCR3 use was conferred on HXB by 89.6 env V3 or V3 through V5 sequences. While replacement of the 89.6 V3 through V5 region with HXB sequences abrogated CCR3 utilization, replacement of V3 or V4 through V5 separately did not. Thus, CCR3 use is determined by sequences within V3 through V5 and most likely can be conferred by either the V3 or the V4 through V5 domains. These results indicate that cofactor utilization and tropism in this dualtropic isolate are determined by complex interactions among multiple env segments, that distinct regions of the Env glycoprotein may be important for utilization of different chemokine receptors, and that determinants in addition to cofactor usage participate in postentry stages in the virus replication cycle that contribute to target cell tropism.     

Determinants of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Envelope Glycoprotein Activation by Soluble CD4 and Monoclonal Antibodies

Infection by some human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) isolates is enhanced by the binding of subneutralizing concentrations of soluble receptor, soluble CD4 (sCD4), or monoclonal antibodies directed against the viral envelope glycoproteins. In this work, we studied the abilities of different antibodies to mediate activation of the envelope glycoproteins of a primary HIV-1 isolate, YU2, and identified the regions of gp120 envelope glycoprotein contributing to activation. Binding of antibodies to a variety of epitopes on gp120, including the CD4 binding site, the third variable (V3) loop, and CD4-induced epitopes, enhanced the entry of viruses containing YU2 envelope glycoproteins. Fab fragments of antibodies directed against either the CD4 binding site or V3 loop also activated YU2 virus infection. The activation phenotype was conferred on the envelope glycoproteins of a laboratory-adapted HIV-1 isolate (HXBc2) by replacing the gp120 V3 loop or V1/V2 and V3 loops with those of the YU2 virus. Infection by the YU2 virus in the presence of activating antibodies remained inhibitable by macrophage inhibitory protein 1β, indicating dependence on the CCR5 coreceptor on the target cells. Thus, antibody enhancement of YU2 entry involves neither Fc receptor binding nor envelope glycoprotein cross-linking, is determined by the same variable loops that dictate enhancement by sCD4, and probably proceeds by a process fundamentally similar to the receptor-activated virus entry pathway.     

Molecular Basis for Cell Tropism of CXCR4-Dependent Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Isolates

Laboratory isolates of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) that utilize CXCR4 as a coreceptor infect primary human macrophages inefficiently even though these express a low but detectable level of cell surface CXCR4. In contrast, infection of primary macrophages by primary CXCR4-tropic HIV-1 isolates is readily detectable. Here, we provide evidence suggesting that this difference in cell tropism results from a higher requirement for cell surface CXCR4 for infection by laboratory HIV-1 isolates. Transfected COS7 cells that express a high level of CD4 but a low level of CXCR4 were infected significantly more efficiently by two primary CXCR4-tropic HIV-1 isolates compared to the prototypic laboratory HIV-1 isolate IIIB. More importantly, overexpression of either wild-type or signaling-defective CXCR4 on primary macrophages dramatically enhanced the efficiency of infection by the laboratory HIV-1 isolate yet only modestly enhanced infection by either primary CXCR4-tropic virus. Overexpression of CD4 had, in contrast, only a limited effect on macrophage infection by the laboratory HIV-1, although infection by the primary isolates was markedly enhanced. We therefore conclude that the laboratory CXCR4-tropic HIV-1 isolate exhibits a significantly higher CXCR4 requirement for efficient infection than do the primary CXCR4-tropic isolates and that this difference can explain the poor ability of the laboratory HIV-1 isolate to replicate in primary macrophages. More generally, we propose that the cell tropisms displayed by different strains of HIV-1 in culture can largely be explained on the basis of differential requirements for cell surface CD4 and/or coreceptor expression levels.     

CD4-Chemokine Receptor Hybrids in Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Infection

Most human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) strains require both CD4 and a chemokine receptor for entry into a host cell. In order to analyze how the HIV-1 envelope glycoprotein interacts with these cellular molecules, we constructed single-molecule hybrids of CD4 and chemokine receptors and expressed these constructs in the mink cell line Mv-1-lu. The two N-terminal (2D) or all four (4D) extracellular domains of CD4 were linked to the N terminus of the chemokine receptor CXCR4. The CD4(2D)CXCR4 hybrid mediated infection by HIV-1(LAI) to nearly the same extent as the wild-type molecules, whereas CD4(4D)CXCR4 was less efficient. Recombinant SU(LAI) protein competed more efficiently with the CXCR4-specific monoclonal antibody 12G5 for binding to CD4(2D)CXCR4 than for binding to CD4(4D)CXCR4. Stromal cell-derived factor 1 (SDF-1) blocked HIV-1(LAI) infection of cells expressing CD4(2D)CXCR4 less efficiently than for cells expressing wild-type CXCR4 and CD4, whereas down-modulation of CXCR4 by SDF-1 was similar for hybrids and wild-type CXCR4. In contrast, the bicyclam AMD3100, a nonpeptide CXCR4 ligand that did not down-modulate the hybrids, blocked hybrid-mediated infection at least as potently as for wild-type CXCR4. Thus SDF-1, but not the smaller molecule AMD3100, may interfere at multiple points with the binding of the surface unit (SU)-CD4 complex to CXCR4, a mechanism that the covalent linkage of CD4 to CXCR4 impedes. Although the CD4-CXCR4 hybrids yielded enhanced SU interactions with the chemokine receptor moiety, this did not overcome the specific coreceptor requirement of different HIV-1 strains: the X4 virus HIV-1(LAI) and the X4R5 virus HIV-1(89. 6), unlike the R5 strain HIV-1(SF162), infected Mv-1-lu cells expressing the CD4(2D)CXCR4 hybrid, but none could use hybrids of CD4 and the chemokine receptor CCR2b, CCR5, or CXCR2. Thus single-molecule hybrid constructs that mimic receptor-coreceptor complexes can be used to dissect coreceptor function and its inhibition.     

Cryoelectron Microscopic Examination of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Virions with Mutations in the Cyclophilin A Binding Loop

The human immunodeficiency virus type 1 capsid protein contains a conserved P₂₁₇X₄PX₂PX₅P₂₃₁ motif. Mutation at Pro-222 decreases virion incorporation of cyclophilin A, while mutation at Pro-231 abolishes infectivity. Although viral RNA incorporation and protease cleavage of the Gag precursor were not affected by these mutations, cryoelectron microscopy revealed a loss of virion maturation in P231A particles.     

Enhanced Exposure of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Primary Isolate Neutralization Epitopes through Binding of CD4 Mimetic Compounds

N-(4-Chlorophenyl)-N′-(2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-piperidin-4-yl)-oxalamide (NBD-556) is a low-molecular-weight compound that reportedly blocks the interaction between human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) gp120 and its receptor CD4. We investigated whether the enhancement of binding of anti-gp120 monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) toward envelope (Env) protein with NBD-556 are similar to those of soluble CD4 (sCD4) by comparing the binding profiles of the individual MAbs to Env-expressing cell surfaces. In flow cytometric analyses, the binding profiles of anti-CD4-induced epitope (CD4i) MAbs toward NBD-556-pretreated Env-expressing cell surfaces were similar to the binding profiles toward sCD4-pretreated cell surfaces. To investigate the binding position of NBD-556 on gp120, we induced HIV-1 variants that were resistant to NBD-556 and sCD4 in vitro. At passage 21 in the presence of 50 μM NBD-556, two amino acid substitutions (S375N in C3 and A433T in C4) were identified. On the other hand, in the selection with sCD4, seven mutations (E211G, P212L, V255E, N280K, S375N, G380R, and G431E) appeared during the passages. The profiles of the mutations after the selections with NBD-556 and sCD4 were very similar in their three-dimensional positions. Moreover, combinations of NBD-556 with anti-gp120 MAbs showed highly synergistic interactions against HIV-1. We further found that after enhancing the neutralizing activity by adding NBD-556, the contemporaneous virus became highly sensitive to antibodies in the patient''s plasma. These findings suggest that small compounds such as NBDs may enhance the neutralizing activities of CD4i and anti-V3 antibodies in vivo.Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) replicates continuously in the face of a strong antibody (Ab) response, although Abs effectively control many viral infections (3). Neutralizing Abs (NAbs) are directed against the HIV-1 envelope (Env) protein, which is a heterodimer comprising an extensively glycosylated CD4-binding subunit (gp120) and an associated transmembrane protein (gp41). Env proteins are present on the virion surface as “spikes” composed of trimers of three gp120-gp41 complexes (20, 21, 29). These spikes resist neutralization through epitope occlusion within the oligomer, extensive glycosylation, extension of variable loops from the surface of the complex, and steric and conformational blocking of receptor binding sites (16, 18, 20).Ab access to conserved regions is further limited because viral entry is a stepwise process involving conformational changes that lead to only transient exposure of conserved domains such as the coreceptor binding site (4, 5). However, some early strains of HIV-1 appear to be highly susceptible to neutralization by Abs (1, 10). For instance, subtype A HIV-1 envelopes from the early stage of infection exhibit a broad range of neutralization sensitivities to both autologous and heterologous plasma (1), suggesting that at least a subset of the envelopes have some preserved and/or exposed neutralization epitopes. It is well known that the potential for neutralizing properties of particular Abs is enhanced after binding of soluble CD4 (sCD4), especially NAbs against CD4-induced epitopes (CD4i Abs) (27) and some anti-V3 Abs (22). CD4i Abs are detected in plasma samples from many patients at an early stage of HIV-1 infection (9). Consequently, we hypothesize that small compounds such as sCD4 can enhance the neutralizing activities of CD4i Abs and some anti-V3 Abs not only in vitro but also in vivo.In a previous report, two low-molecular-weight compounds that presumably interfere with viral entry of HIV-1 into cells were described (35). These two N-phenyl-N′-(2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-piperidin-4-yl)-oxalamide analogs, NBD-556 and NBD-557, comprise a novel class of HIV-1 entry inhibitors that block the interaction between gp120 and CD4. These compounds were found to be equally potent inhibitors of both X4 and R5 viruses in CXCR4- and CCR5-expressing cell lines, respectively (35). Schön et al. (25) also reported that NBD-556 binds to gp120 in a process characterized by a large favorable change in enthalpy that is partially compensated for by a large unfavorable entropy change, representing a thermodynamic signature similar to that observed for binding of sCD4 to gp120. In a recent study, Madani et al. (23) reported the following findings: (i) NBD-556 binds within the Phe43 cavity, a highly conserved and functionally important pocket formed as gp120 assumes the CD4-bound conformation; (ii) the NBD-556 phenyl ring projects into the Phe43 cavity; (iii) the enhancement of CD4-independent infection by NBD-556 requires the induction of conformational changes in gp120; and (iv) increased affinities of NBD-556 analogs toward gp120 improve the antiviral potency during infection of CD4-expressing cells. The latter two studies demonstrated that low-molecular-weight compounds such as NBDs can induce conformational changes in the HIV-1 gp120 glycoprotein similar to those observed upon sCD4 binding (23, 25). The authors of these studies concluded that their data supported the importance of gp120 residues near the Phe43 cavity in binding to NBD-556 and lent credence to the docked binding mode.In the present study, we investigated the binding position of NBD-556 on gp120 by inducing HIV-1 variants that were resistant to NBD-556 by exposing HIV-1_IIIB to increasing concentrations of the compound in vitro. We also induced sCD4-resistant HIV-1_IIIB variants and compared the profile of the sCD4-resistant mutations to that of the NBD-556-resistant mutations. We subsequently examined the virological properties of pseudotyped HIV-1 clones carrying the NBD-556 and sCD4 resistance-associated env gene mutations. Our findings provide a foundation for understanding the interaction of NBD-556 with the CD4-binding site of HIV-1 gp120. We also evaluated the anti-HIV-1 interactions between plasma NAbs and NBD-556 in vitro and considered the possibility of using the data as a key to opening the shield covering the conserved epitopes targeted by NAbs.(This study was presented in part at the 15th Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infection, Boston, MA, 3 to 6 February 2008 [Abstract 736].)     

Particle Size Determinants in the Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Gag Protein

The retroviral Gag protein plays the central role in the assembly process and can form membrane-enclosed, virus-like particles in the absence of any other viral products. These particles are similar to authentic virions in density and size. Three small domains of the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) Gag protein have been previously identified as being important for budding. Regions that lie outside these domains can be deleted without any effect on particle release or density. However, the regions of Gag that control the size of HIV-1 particles are less well understood. In the case of Rous sarcoma virus (RSV), the size determinant maps to the CA (capsid) and adjacent spacer sequences within Gag, but systematic mapping of the HIV Gag protein has not been reported. To locate the size determinants of HIV-1, we analyzed a large collection of Gag mutants. To our surprise, all mutants with defects in the MA (matrix), CA, and the N-terminal part of NC (nucleocapsid) sequences produced dense particles of normal size, suggesting that oncoviruses (RSV) and lentiviruses (HIV-1) have different size-controlling elements. The most important region found to be critical for determining HIV-1 particle size is the p6 sequence. Particles lacking all or small parts of p6 were uniform in size distribution but very large as measured by rate zonal gradients. Further evidence for this novel function of p6 was obtained by placing this sequence at the C terminus of RSV CA mutants that produce heterogeneously sized particles. We found that the RSV-p6 chimeras produced normally sized particles. Thus, we present evidence that the entire p6 sequence plays a role in determining the size of a retroviral particle.     

Rabbit Cells Expressing Human CD4 and Human CCR5 Are Highly Permissive for Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Infection

To evaluate the feasibility of using transgenic rabbits expressing CCR5 and CD4 as a small-animal model of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV) disease, we examined whether the expression of the human chemokine receptor (CCR5) and human CD4 would render a rabbit cell line (SIRC) permissive to HIV replication. Histologically, SIRC cells expressing CD4 and CCR5 formed multinucleated cells (syncytia) upon exposure to BaL, a macrophagetropic strain of HIV that uses CCR5 for cell entry. Intracellular viral capsid p24 staining showed abundant viral gene expression in BaL-infected SIRC cells expressing CD4 and CCR5. In contrast, neither SIRC cells expressing CD4 alone nor murine 3T3 cells expressing CCR5 and CD4 exhibited significant expression of p24. These stably transfected rabbit cells were also highly permissive for the production of virions upon infection by two other CCR5-dependent strains (JR-CSF and YU-2) but not by a CXCR4-dependent strain (NL4-3). The functional integrity of these virions was demonstrated by the successful infection of human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) with viral stocks prepared from these transfected rabbit cells. Furthermore, primary rabbit PBMC were found to be permissive for production of infectious virions after circumventing the cellular entry step. These results suggest that a transgenic rabbit model for the study of HIV disease may be feasible.     

CCR5- and CXCR4-Utilizing Strains of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Exhibit Differential Tropism and Pathogenesis In Vivo

CCR5-utilizing (R5) and CXCR4-utilizing (X4) strains of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) have been studied intensively in vitro, but the pathologic correlates of such differential tropism in vivo remain incompletely defined. In this study, X4 and R5 strains of HIV-1 were compared for tropism and pathogenesis in SCID-hu Thy/Liv mice, an in vivo model of human thymopoiesis. The X4 strain NL4-3 replicates quickly and extensively in thymocytes in the cortex and medulla, causing significant depletion. In contrast, the R5 strain Ba-L initially infects stromal cells including macrophages in the thymic medulla, without any obvious pathologic consequence. After a period of 3 to 4 weeks, Ba-L infection slowly spreads through the thymocyte populations, occasionally culminating in thymocyte depletion after week 6 of infection. During the entire time of infection, Ba-L did not mutate into variants capable of utilizing CXCR4. Therefore, X4 strains are highly cytopathic after infection of the human thymus. In contrast, infection with R5 strains of HIV-1 can result in a two-phase process in vivo, involving apparently nonpathogenic replication in medullary stromal cells followed by cytopathic replication in thymocytes.     

Heterosexual Transmission of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Subtype C: Macrophage Tropism,Alternative Coreceptor Use,and the Molecular Anatomy of CCR5 Utilization

Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 transmission selects for virus variants with genetic characteristics distinct from those of donor quasispecies, but the biological factors favoring their transmission or establishment in new hosts are poorly understood. We compared primary target cell tropisms and entry coreceptor utilizations of donor and recipient subtype C Envs obtained near the time of acute infection from Zambian heterosexual transmission pairs. Both donor and recipient Envs demonstrated only modest macrophage tropism, and there was no overall difference between groups in macrophage or CD4 T-cell infection efficiency. Several individual pairs showed donor/recipient differences in primary cell infection, but these were not consistent between pairs. Envs had surprisingly broad uses of GPR15, CXCR6, and APJ, but little or no use of CCR2b, CCR3, CCR8, GPR1, and CXCR4. Donors overall used GPR15 better than did recipients. However, while several individual pairs showed donor/recipient differences for GPR15 and/or other coreceptors, the direction of the differences was inconsistent, and several pairs had unique alternative coreceptor patterns that were conserved across the transmission barrier. CCR5/CCR2b chimeras revealed that recipients as a group were more sensitive than were donors to replacement of the CCR5 extracellular loops with corresponding regions of CCR2b, but significant differences in this direction were not consistent within pairs. These data show that sexual transmission does not select for enhanced macrophage tropism, nor for preferential use of any alternative coreceptor. Recipient Envs are somewhat more constrained than are donors in flexibility of CCR5 use, but this pattern is not universal for all pairs, indicating that it is not an absolute requirement.A majority of new human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infections are initiated by only a single genetic species, although in some, several closely related variants are transmitted (19, 26, 34, 44, 55). Nevertheless, in all cases, a molecular bottleneck occurs during transmission (8, 15, 22, 33, 56). This bottleneck does not appear to be simply a stochastic result of low-efficiency transmission since viral sequences in recipients do not typically reflect the majority sequences in donors, even in genital secretions responsible for transmission (22, 56). Identifying the biological factors that favor particular variants in transmission and/or establishment in new hosts is essential both to understanding the mechanisms of transmission and to developing approaches, including vaccines and microbicides, that might interrupt transmission.More than 15 years ago, it was recognized that new infections were nearly always initiated by HIV-1 variants that were macrophage tropic and non-syncytium inducing (NSI) in T-cell lines, even though donors often harbored variants that were syncytium inducing (SI) and non-macrophage tropic (55). The molecular basis for these characteristics was subsequently linked to use of the entry coreceptor CCR5 by macrophage-tropic/NSI transmitted variants (R5 strains), with exclusion of T-cell-line-tropic/SI or dual-tropic variants that use CXCR4 (X4 or R5X4 strains). The critical role for CCR5-using strains in transmission is underscored by the fact that individuals who genetically lack CCR5 expression are highly resistant to HIV-1 infection (32, 49). Many potential mechanisms have been offered to explain the requirement for CCR5-mediated transmission, including R5 infection of macrophages at sites of transmission, preferential uptake by dendritic cells at mucosal sites, selective transcytosis by epithelial cells, or greater susceptibility of CCR5-rich memory T lymphocytes that are the main reservoir for viral amplification during acute infection (reviewed in reference 35). However, the virus-cell interactions that underlie this powerful restriction remain to be defined.Even among transmission pairs in which donors harbored only R5 variants, however, genetic selection at transmission indicates that selective forces beyond just CCR5 use appear to be operative. In a cohort of serodiscordant Zambian couples infected with subtype C HIV-1 followed prospectively, in which transmission subsequently occurred, the gp120 envelope glycoprotein of transmitted variants were typically more compact than those of chronically infected donors, with shorter V1/V2 regions and fewer potential N-linked glycosylation sites (15). Similar genetic and/or serological selections have been identified in several additional, although not all, cohorts (8, 31, 33). One biological feature associated with the transmitted variants is greater sensitivity to neutralization by the infecting partner''s antibody (15). However, it is unclear what selective advantage this property would provide in an immune naïve recipient, compared with other variants present in donors, raising the possibility that these gp120 features may confer other biological characteristics favoring transmission and/or establishment of infection.In this study, we compared the tropism and coreceptor utilization characteristics of donor and recipient Env glycoproteins derived from subtype C heterosexual transmission pairs obtained near the time of acute infection that have previously been linked to this genetic selection pattern (15). Because of the potential role for macrophages in transmission and uncertainty over the importance of macrophage tropism per se in the bottleneck, we assessed these variants’ ability to mediate entry into primary human macrophages, as well as primary CD4⁺ T cells. In addition to CCR5 and CXCR4, a number of other G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) can support HIV-1 entry and infection in in vitro systems, although a role for these alternative coreceptors in vivo has yet to be identified. Therefore, to address the possibility that one of these pathways might be involved in sexual transmission and contribute to the molecular bottleneck, we asked if donor and recipient Envs differed in their abilities to use alternative coreceptors for entry. Finally, since HIV-1 gp120 molecules vary in the molecular details of how they interact with CCR5, and since CCR5 may be expressed differently in the context of different target cells (29), we determined whether molecular anatomy of CCR5 use was different between donor and recipient Envs. Finally, in addition to enabling comparison of donors and recipients within transmission pairs, the panel of Envs also enabled us to address the tropism and coreceptor characteristics of “chronic” versus “acute” subtype C Envs.     

Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Nef Protein Targets CD4 to the Multivesicular Body Pathway

The Nef protein of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 downregulates the CD4 coreceptor from the surface of host cells by accelerating the rate of CD4 endocytosis through a clathrin/AP-2 pathway. Herein, we report that Nef has the additional function of targeting CD4 to the multivesicular body (MVB) pathway for eventual delivery to lysosomes. This targeting involves the endosomal sorting complex required for transport (ESCRT) machinery. Perturbation of this machinery does not prevent removal of CD4 from the cell surface but precludes its lysosomal degradation, indicating that accelerated endocytosis and targeting to the MVB pathway are separate functions of Nef. We also show that both CD4 and Nef are ubiquitinated on lysine residues, but this modification is dispensable for Nef-induced targeting of CD4 to the MVB pathway.Primate immunodeficiency viruses infect helper T lymphocytes and cells of the macrophage/monocyte lineage by binding of their viral envelope glycoprotein, Env, to a combination of two host cell-specific surface proteins, CD4 and either the CCR5 or CXCR4 chemokine receptors (reviewed in reference 62). Ensuing fusion of the viral envelope with the host cell plasma membrane delivers the viral genetic material into the cytoplasm. Remarkably, the most highly transcribed viral gene in the early phase of infection does not encode an enzyme or structural protein but an accessory protein named Nef. Early expression of Nef is thought to reprogram the host cell for optimal replication of the virus. Indeed, Nef has been shown to enhance virus production (19, 24, 59, 74) and to promote progression to AIDS (23, 47, 48), making it an attractive candidate for pharmacologic intervention.Nef is an N-terminally myristoylated protein with a molecular mass of 27 kDa for human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) and 35 kDa for HIV-2 and simian immunodeficiency virus (27, 29, 50, 65). Nef has been ascribed many functions, the best characterized of which is the downregulation of the CD4 coreceptor from the surface of infected cells (28, 35, 57). CD4 downregulation is believed to prevent superinfection (8, 52) and to preclude the cellular retention of newly synthesized Env (8, 49), thus allowing the establishment of a robust infection (30, 71).The molecular mechanism by which Nef downregulates CD4 has been extensively studied. A consensus has emerged that Nef accelerates the endocytosis of cell surface CD4 (2, 64) by linking the cytosolic tail of CD4 to the heterotetrameric (α-β2-μ2-σ2) adaptor protein-2 (AP-2) complex (17, 25, 34, 45, 67). Determinants in the CD4 tail bind to a hydrophobic pocket comprising tryptophan-57 and leucine-58 on the folded core domain of Nef (34). On the other hand, a dileucine motif (i.e., ENTSLL, residues 160 to 165) (14, 22, 32) and a diacidic motif (i.e., DD, residues 174 and 175) (3) (residues correspond to the NL4-3 clone of HIV-1) within a C-terminal, flexible loop of Nef bind to the α and σ2 subunits of AP-2 (17, 18, 25, 51). AP-2, in turn, binds to clathrin, leading to the concentration of CD4 within clathrin-coated pits (15, 33). These pits eventually bud from the plasma membrane as clathrin-coated vesicles that deliver internalized CD4 to endosomes. In essence, then, Nef acts as a connector that confers on CD4 the ability to be rapidly internalized in a manner similar to endocytic receptors (75).Unlike typical endocytic recycling receptors like the transferrin receptor or the low-density lipoprotein receptor, however, CD4 that is forcibly internalized by Nef does not return to the cell surface but is delivered to lysosomes for degradation (4, 64, 68). Thus, expression of Nef decreases both the surface and total levels of CD4. What keeps internalized CD4 from returning to the plasma membrane? We hypothesized that Nef might additionally act on endosomes to direct CD4 to lysosomes. This is precisely the fate followed by signaling receptors, transporters, and other transmembrane proteins that undergo ubiquitination-mediated internalization and targeting to the multivesicular body (MVB) pathway (40, 46). This targeting involves the endosomal sorting complex required for transport (ESCRT), including the ESCRT-0, -I, -II, and -III complexes, which function to sort ubiquitinated cargoes into intraluminal vesicles of MVBs for eventual degradation in lysosomes (40, 46). Herein, we show that Nef indeed plays a novel role in targeting internalized CD4 from endosomes to the MVB pathway in an ESCRT-dependent manner. We also show that both Nef and CD4 undergo ubiquitination on lysine residues, but, strikingly, this modification is not required for CD4 targeting to the MVB pathway.     

Soluble CD23 in Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Infected Patients

The level of sCD23 produced in the course of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection was measured in patients grouped according to the Centers for Disease Control by using an immunoradiometric assay. Soluble CD23 was evaluated in supernatants of peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) (10⁶ cells/ml) stimulated by phytohemagglutinin (PHA). Compared with healthy controls (m±S.D. = 1.0 ±0.34 U/ml, n = 7), higher values were observed in some of the patients of group II (asymptomatic) (m±S.D. = 2±1.33, n = 9) and some of the patients of group IV (AIDS) (m±S.D. = 1.3 ±1.40, n = 8). Those results prompted us to compare the plasma levels of sCD23 in group II and group IV HIV-infected patients and in healthy individuals. Soluble CD23 plasma levels in healthy patients (n = 42) ranged from 0 to 1.5 U/ml (m±S.D. = 0.9±0.33), in group II patients (n = 17) from 0 to 3 U/ml (m±S.D. = 0.92±0.83) and in group IV patients (n =73) from 0 to 2.9 U/ml (m±S.D. = 1.15±0.71). The differences between the patients and the healthy individuals were not statistically significant but individual sCD23 values higher than 2 U/ml were obtained in 6% of the group II patients and 16.7% of the group IV patients. Increased values of sCD23 were obtained in plasma from patients with secondary infectious diseases (groups IV-C1 and IV-C2) and from patients without secondary infectious diseases (group II, group IV-A and group IV-B). Elevated values of sCD23 were detected even in patients with low counts of CD4⁺ T cells and CD8⁺ T cells in their peripheral blood. sCD23 has numerous activities including control of IgE synthesis and cytokine-like properties. Our results show a disarray of sCD23 in HIV-infected patients which could be involved in drug reactions, allergic manifestations and the IgE-level increase. Further investigations should attempt to define the role of sCD23 in clinical manifestations of HIV infection.     

Adaptation of a CCR5-Using, Primary Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Isolate for CD4-Independent Replication

The gp120 envelope glycoprotein of the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) promotes virus entry by sequentially binding CD4 and chemokine receptors on the target cell. Primary, clinical HIV-1 isolates require interaction with CD4 to allow gp120 to bind the CCR5 chemokine receptor efficiently. We adapted a primary HIV-1 isolate, ADA, to replicate in CD4-negative canine cells expressing human CCR5. The gp120 changes responsible for the adaptation were limited to alteration of glycosylation addition sites in the V2 loop-V1-V2 stem. The gp120 glycoproteins of the adapted viruses bound CCR5 directly, without prior interaction with CD4. Thus, a major function of CD4 binding in the entry of primary HIV-1 isolates can be bypassed by changes in the gp120 V1-V2 elements, which allow the envelope glycoproteins to assume a conformation competent for CCR5 binding.     

Primary Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 2 (HIV-2) Isolates Infect CD4-Negative Cells via CCR5 and CXCR4: Comparison with HIV-1 and Simian Immunodeficiency Virus and Relevance to Cell Tropism In Vivo

Cell surface receptors exploited by human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) for infection are major determinants of tropism. HIV-1 usually requires two receptors to infect cells. Gp120 on HIV-1 virions binds CD4 on the cell surface, triggering conformational rearrangements that create or expose a binding site for a seven-transmembrane (7TM) coreceptor. Although HIV-2 and SIV strains also use CD4, several laboratory-adapted HIV-2 strains infect cells without CD4, via an interaction with the coreceptor CXCR4. Moreover, the envelope glycoproteins of SIV of macaques (SIV(MAC)) can bind to and initiate infection of CD4(-) cells via CCR5. Here, we show that most primary HIV-2 isolates can infect either CCR5(+) or CXCR4(+) cells without CD4. The efficiency of CD4-independent infection by HIV-2 was comparable to that of SIV, but markedly higher than that of HIV-1. CD4-independent HIV-2 strains that could use both CCR5 and CXCR4 to infect CD4(+) cells were only able to use one of these receptors in the absence of CD4. Our observations therefore indicate (i) that HIV-2 and SIV envelope glycoproteins form a distinct conformation that enables contact with a 7TM receptor without CD4, and (ii) the use of CD4 enables a wider range of 7TM receptors to be exploited for infection and may assist adaptation or switching to new coreceptors in vivo. Primary CD4(-) fetal astrocyte cultures expressed CXCR4 and supported replication by the T-cell-line-adapted ROD/B strain. Productive infection by primary X4 strains was only triggered upon treatment of virus with soluble CD4. Thus, many primary HIV-2 strains infect CCR5(+) or CXCR4(+) cell lines without CD4 in vitro. CD4(-) cells that express these coreceptors in vivo, however, may still resist HIV-2 entry due to insufficient coreceptor concentration on the cell surface to trigger fusion or their expression in a conformation nonfunctional as a coreceptor. Our study, however, emphasizes that primary HIV-2 strains carry the potential to infect CD4(-) cells expressing CCR5 or CXCR4 in vivo.