Interactions of DNA with Biofilm-Derived Membrane Vesicles

The biofilm matrix contributes to the chemistry, structure, and function of biofilms. Biofilm-derived membrane vesicles (MVs) and DNA, both matrix components, demonstrated concentration-, pH-, and cation-dependent interactions. Furthermore, MV-DNA association influenced MV surface properties. This bears consequences for the reactivity and availability for interaction of matrix polymers and other constituents.The biofilm matrix contributes to the chemistry, structure, and function of biofilms and is crucial for the development of fundamental biofilm properties (46, 47). Early studies defined polysaccharides as the matrix component, but proteins, lipids, and nucleic acids are all now acknowledged as important contributors (7, 15). Indeed, DNA has emerged as a vital participant, fulfilling structural and functional roles (1, 5, 6, 19, 31, 34, 36, 41, 43, 44). The phosphodiester bond of DNA renders this polyanionic at a physiological pH, undoubtedly contributing to interactions with cations, humic substances, fine-dispersed minerals, and matrix entities (25, 41, 49).In addition to particulates such as flagella and pili, membrane vesicles (MVs) are also found within the matrices of gram-negative and mixed biofilms (3, 16, 40). MVs are multifunctional bilayered structures that bleb from the outer membranes of gram-negative bacteria (reviewed in references 4, 24, 27, 28, and 30) and are chemically heterogeneous, combining the known chemistries of the biofilm matrix. Examination of biofilm samples by transmission electron microscopy (TEM) has suggested that matrix material interacts with MVs (Fig. ​(Fig.1).1). Since MVs produced in planktonic culture have associated DNA (11, 12, 13, 20, 21, 30, 39, 48), could biofilm-derived MVs incorporate DNA (1, 39, 40, 44)?Open in a separate windowFIG. 1.Possible interactions between matrix polymers and particulate structures. Shown is an electron micrograph of a thin section through a P. aeruginosa PAO1 biofilm. During processing, some dehydration occurred, resulting in collapse of matrix material into fibrillate arrangements (black filled arrows). There is a suggestion of interactions occurring with particulate structures such as MVs (hollow white arrow) and flagella (filled white arrows) (identified by the appearance and cross-dimension of these highly ordered structures when viewed at high magnification), which was consistently observed with other embedded samples and also with whole-mount preparations of gently disrupted biofilms (data not shown). The scale bar represents 200 nm.     

Divergent Evolution of Norovirus GII/4 by Genome Recombination from May 2006 to February 2009 in Japan

Norovirus GII/4 is a leading cause of acute viral gastroenteritis in humans. We examined here how the GII/4 virus evolves to generate and sustain new epidemics in humans, using 199 near-full-length GII/4 genome sequences and 11 genome segment clones from human stool specimens collected at 19 sites in Japan between May 2006 and February 2009. Phylogenetic studies demonstrated outbreaks of 7 monophyletic GII/4 subtypes, among which a single subtype, termed 2006b, had continually predominated. Phylogenetic-tree, bootscanning-plot, and informative-site analyses revealed that 4 of the 7 GII/4 subtypes were mosaics of recently prevalent GII/4 subtypes and 1 was made up of the GII/4 and GII/12 genotypes. Notably, single putative recombination breakpoints with the highest statistical significance were constantly located around the border of open reading frame 1 (ORF1) and ORF2 (P ≤ 0.000001), suggesting outgrowth of specific recombinant viruses in the outbreaks. The GII/4 subtypes had many unique amino acids at the time of their outbreaks, especially in the N-term, 3A-like, and capsid proteins. Unique amino acids in the capsids were preferentially positioned on the outer surface loops of the protruding P2 domain and more abundant in the dominant subtypes. These findings suggest that intersubtype genome recombination at the ORF1/2 boundary region is a common mechanism that realizes independent and concurrent changes on the virion surface and in viral replication proteins for the persistence of norovirus GII/4 in human populations.Norovirus (NoV) is a nonenveloped RNA virus that belongs to the family Caliciviridae and can cause acute gastroenteritis in humans. The NoV genome is a single-stranded, positive-sense, polyadenylated RNA that encodes three open reading frames, ORF1, ORF2, and ORF3 (68). ORF1 encodes a long polypeptide (∼200 kDa) that is cleaved in the cells by the viral proteinase (3C^pro) into six proteins (4). These proteins function in NoV replication in host cells (19). ORF2 encodes a viral capsid protein, VP1. The capsid gene evolved at a rate of 4.3 × 10⁻³ nucleotide substitutions/site/year (7), which is comparable to the substitution rates of the envelope and capsid genes of human immunodeficiency virus (30). The capsid protein of NoV consists of a shell (S) and two protruding (P) domains: P1 and P2 (47). The S domain is relatively conserved within the same genetic lineages of NoVs (38) and is responsible for the assembly of VP1 (6). The P1 subdomain is also relatively conserved (38) and has a role in enhancing the stability of virus particles (6). The P2 domain is positioned at the most exposed surface of the virus particle (47) and forms binding clefts for putative infection receptors, such as human histo-blood group antigens (HBGA) (8, 13, 14, 60). The P2 domain also contains epitopes for neutralizing antibodies (27, 33) and is consistently highly variable even within the same genetic lineage of NoVs (38). ORF3 encodes a VP2 protein that is suggested to be a minor structural component of virus particles (18) and to be responsible for the expression and stabilization of VP1 (5).Thus far, the NoVs found in nature are classified into five genogroups (GI to GV) and multiple genotypes on the basis of the phylogeny of capsid sequences (71). Among them, genogroup II genotype 4 (GII/4), which was present in humans in the mid-1970s (7), is now the leading cause of NoV-associated acute gastroenteritis in humans (54). The GII/4 is further subclassifiable into phylogenetically distinct subtypes (32, 38, 53). Notably, the emergence and spread of a new GII/4 subtype with multiple amino acid substitutions on the capsid surface are often associated with greater magnitudes of NoV epidemics (53, 54). In 2006 and 2007, a GII/4 subtype, termed 2006b, prevailed globally over preexisting GII/4 subtypes in association with increased numbers of nonbacterial acute gastroenteritis cases in many countries, including Japan (32, 38, 53). The 2006b subtype has multiple unique amino acid substitutions that occur most preferentially in the protruding subdomain of the capsid, the P2 subdomain (32, 38, 53). Together with information on human population immunity against NoV GII/4 subtypes (12, 32), it has been postulated that the accumulation of P2 mutations gives rise to antigenic drift and plays a key role in new epidemics of NoV GII/4 in humans (32, 38, 53).Genetic recombination is common in RNA viruses (67). In NoV, recombination was first suggested by the phylogenetic analysis of an NoV genome segment clone: a discordant branching order was noted with the trees of the 3D^pol and capsid coding regions (21). Subsequently, many studies have reported the phylogenetic discordance using sequences from various epidemic sites in different study periods (1, 10, 11, 16, 17, 22, 25, 40, 41, 44-46, 49, 51, 57, 63, 64, 66). These results suggest that genome recombination frequently occurs among distinct lineages of NoV variants in vivo. However, the studies were done primarily with direct sequencing data of the short genome portion, and information on the cloned genome segment or full-length genome sequences is very limited (21, 25). Therefore, we lack an overview of the structural and temporal dynamics of viral genomes during NoV epidemics, and it remains unclear whether NoV mosaicism plays a role in these events.To clarify these issues, we collected 199 near-full-length genome sequences of GII/4 from NoV outbreaks over three recent years in Japan, divided them into monophyletic subtypes, analyzed the temporal and geographical distribution of the subtypes, collected phylogenetic evidence for the viral genome mosaicism of the subtypes, identified putative recombination breakpoints in the genomes, and isolated mosaic genome segments from the stool specimens. We also performed computer-assisted sequence and structural analyses with the identified subtypes to address the relationship between the numbers of P2 domain mutations at the times of the outbreaks and the magnitudes of the epidemics. The obtained data suggest that intersubtype genome recombination at the ORF1/2 boundary region is common in the new GII/4 outbreaks and promotes the effective acquisition of mutation sets of heterogeneous capsid surface and viral replication proteins.     

Characterization of a Putative Ancestor of Coxsackievirus B5

Like other RNA viruses, coxsackievirus B5 (CVB5) exists as circulating heterogeneous populations of genetic variants. In this study, we present the reconstruction and characterization of a probable ancestral virion of CVB5. Phylogenetic analyses based on capsid protein-encoding regions (the VP1 gene of 41 clinical isolates and the entire P1 region of eight clinical isolates) of CVB5 revealed two major cocirculating lineages. Ancestral capsid sequences were inferred from sequences of these contemporary CVB5 isolates by using maximum likelihood methods. By using Bayesian phylodynamic analysis, the inferred VP1 ancestral sequence dated back to 1854 (1807 to 1898). In order to study the properties of the putative ancestral capsid, the entire ancestral P1 sequence was synthesized de novo and inserted into the replicative backbone of an infectious CVB5 cDNA clone. Characterization of the recombinant virus in cell culture showed that fully functional infectious virus particles were assembled and that these viruses displayed properties similar to those of modern isolates in terms of receptor preferences, plaque phenotypes, growth characteristics, and cell tropism. This is the first report describing the resurrection and characterization of a picornavirus with a putative ancestral capsid. Our approach, including a phylogenetics-based reconstruction of viral predecessors, could serve as a starting point for experimental studies of viral evolution and might also provide an alternative strategy for the development of vaccines.The group B coxsackieviruses (CVBs) (serotypes 1 to 6) were discovered in the 1950s in a search for new poliovirus-like viruses (33, 61). Infections caused by CVBs are often asymptomatic but may occasionally result in severe diseases of the heart, pancreas, and central nervous system (99). CVBs are small icosahedral RNA viruses belonging to the Human enterovirus B (HEV-B) species within the family Picornaviridae (89). In the positive single-stranded RNA genome, the capsid proteins VP1 to VP4 are encoded within the P1 region, whereas the nonstructural proteins required for virus replication are encoded within the P2 and P3 regions (4). The 30-nm capsid has an icosahedral symmetry and consists of 60 copies of each of the four structural proteins. The VP1, VP2, and VP3 proteins are surface exposed, whereas the VP4 protein lines the interior of the virus capsid (82). The coxsackievirus and adenovirus receptor (CAR), a cell adhesion molecule of the immunoglobulin superfamily, serves as the major cell surface attachment molecule for all six serotypes of CVB (5, 6, 39, 60, 98). Some strains of CVB1, CVB3 and CVB5 also interact with the decay-accelerating factor (DAF) (CD55), a member of the family of proteins that regulate the complement cascade. However, the attachment of CVBs to DAF alone does not permit the infection of cells (6, 7, 59, 85).Picornaviruses exist as genetically highly diverse populations within their hosts, referred to as quasispecies (20, 57). This genetic plasticity enables these viruses to adapt rapidly to new environments, but at the same time, it may compromise the structural integrity and enzymatic functionality of the virus. The selective constraints imposed on the picornavirus genome are reflected in the different regions used for different types of evolutionary studies. The highly conserved RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (3D^pol) gene is used to establish phylogenetic relationships between more-distantly related viruses (e.g., viruses belonging to different genera) (38), whereas the variable genomic sequence encoding the VP1 protein is used for the classification of serotypes (13, 14, 69, 71, 72).In 1963, Pauling and Zuckerkandl proposed that comparative analyses of contemporary protein sequences can be used to predict the sequences of their ancient predecessors (73). Experimental reconstruction of ancestral character states has been applied to evolutionary studies of several different proteins, e.g., galectins (49), G protein-coupled receptors (52), alcohol dehydrogenases (95), rhodopsins (15), ribonucleases (46, 88, 110), elongation factors (32), steroid receptors (10, 96, 97), and transposons (1, 45, 87). In the field of virology, reconstructed ancestral or consensus protein sequences have been used in attempts to develop vaccine candidates for human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (21, 51, 66, 81) but rarely to examine general phenotypic properties.In this study, a CVB5 virus with a probable ancestral virion (CVB5-P1anc) was constructed and characterized. We first analyzed in detail the evolutionary relationships between structural genes of modern CVB5 isolates and inferred a time scale for their evolutionary history. An ancestral virion sequence was subsequently inferred by using a maximum likelihood (ML) method. This sequence was then synthesized de novo, cloned into a replicative backbone of an infectious CVB5 cDNA clone, and transfected into HeLa cells. The hypothetical CVB5-P1anc assembled into functional virus particles that displayed phenotypic properties similar to those of contemporary clinical isolates. This is the first report describing the reconstruction and characterization of a fully functional picornavirus with a putative ancestral capsid.     

Tryptophan Residues in the Portal Protein of Herpes Simplex Virus 1 Critical to the Interaction with Scaffold Proteins and Incorporation of the Portal into Capsids

Incorporation of the herpes simplex virus 1 (HSV-1) portal vertex into the capsid requires interaction with a 12-amino-acid hydrophobic domain within capsid scaffold proteins. The goal of this work was to identify domains and residues in the U_L6-encoded portal protein pU_L6 critical to the interaction with scaffold proteins. We show that whereas the wild-type portal and scaffold proteins readily coimmunoprecipitated with one another in the absence of other viral proteins, truncation beyond the first 18 or last 36 amino acids of the portal protein precluded this coimmunoprecipitation. The coimmunoprecipitation was also precluded by mutation of conserved tryptophan (W) residues to alanine (A) at positions 27, 90, 127, 163, 241, 262, 532, and 596 of U_L6. All of these W-to-A mutations precluded the rescue of a viral deletion mutant lacking U_L6, except W163A, which supported replication poorly, and W596A, which fully rescued replication. A recombinant virus bearing the W596A mutation replicated and packaged DNA normally, and scaffold proteins readily coimmunoprecipitated with portal protein from lysates of infected cells. Thus, viral functions compensated for the W596A mutation''s detrimental effects on the portal-scaffold interaction seen during transient expression of portal and scaffold proteins. In contrast, the W27A mutation precluded portal-scaffold interactions in infected cell lysates, reduced the solubility of pU_L6, decreased incorporation of the portal into capsids, and abrogated viral-DNA cleavage and packaging.Immature herpesvirus capsids or procapsids consist of two shells: an inner shell, or scaffold, and an outer shell that is roughly spherical and largely composed of the major capsid protein VP5 (24, 38).The capsid scaffold consists of a mixture of the U_L26.5 and U_L26 gene products, with the U_L26.5 gene product (pU_L26.5, ICP35, or VP22a) being the most abundant (1, 12, 20, 21, 32, 38). The U_L26.5 open reading frame shares its coding frame and C terminus with the U_L26 gene but initiates at codon 307 of U_L26 (17). The extreme C termini of both VP22a and the UL26-encoded protein (pU_L26) interact with the N terminus of VP5 (7, 14, 26, 40, 41). Capsid assembly likely initiates when the portal binds VP5/VP22a and/or VP5/pU_L26 complexes (22, 25). The addition of more of these complexes to growing capsid shells eventually produces a closed sphere bearing a single portal. pU_L26 within the scaffold contains a protease that cleaves itself between amino acids 247 and 248, separating pU_L26 into an N-terminal protease domain called VP24 and a C-terminal domain termed VP21 (4, 5, 8, 9, 28, 42). The protease also cleaves 25 amino acids from pU_L26 and VP22a to release VP5 (5, 8, 9). VP21 and VP22a are replaced with DNA when the DNA is packaged (12, 29).When capsids undergo maturation, the outer protein shell angularizes to become icosahedral (13). One fivefold-symmetrical vertex in the angularized outer capsid shell is biochemically distinct from the other 11 and is called the portal vertex because it serves as the channel through which DNA is inserted as it is packaged (23). In herpes simplex virus (HSV), the portal vertex is composed of 12 copies of the portal protein encoded by U_L6 (2, 23, 39). We and others have shown that interactions between scaffold and portal proteins are critical for incorporation of the portal into the capsid (15, 33, 44, 45). Twelve amino acids of scaffold proteins are sufficient to interact with the portal protein, and tyrosine and proline resides within this domain are critical for the interaction with scaffold proteins and incorporation of the portal into capsids (45).One goal of the current study was to map domains and residues within the U_L6-encoded portal protein that mediate interaction with scaffold proteins. We show that the portal-scaffold interaction requires all but the first 18 and last 36 amino acids of pU_L6, as well as several tryptophan residues positioned throughout the portal protein.     

Time-Dependent Transformation of the Herpesvirus Tegument

All herpesviruses have a layer of protein called the tegument that lies between the virion membrane and the capsid. The tegument consists of multiple, virus-encoded protein species that together can account for nearly half the total virus protein. To clarify the structure of the tegument and its attachment to the capsid, we used electron microscopy and protein analysis to examine the tegument of herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1). Electron microscopic examination of intact virions revealed that whereas the tegument was asymmetrically distributed around the capsid in extracellular virions, it was symmetrically arranged in cell-associated virus. Examination of virions after treatment with nonionic detergent demonstrated that: (i) in extracellular virus the tegument was resistant to removal with Triton X-100 (TX-100), whereas it was lost nearly completely when cell-associated virus was treated in the same way; (ii) the tegument in TX-100-treated extracellular virions was asymmetrically distributed around the capsid as it is in unextracted virus; and (iii) in some images, tegument was seen to be linked to the capsid by short, regularly spaced connectors. Further analysis was carried out with extracellular virus harvested from cells at different times after infection. It was observed that while the amount of tegument present in virions was not affected by time of harvest, the amount remaining after TX-100 treatment increased markedly as the time of harvest was increased from 24 h to 64 h postinfection. The results support the view that HSV-1 virions undergo a time-dependent change in which the tegument is transformed from a state in which it is symmetrically organized around the capsid and extractable with TX-100 to a state where it is asymmetrically arranged and resistant to extraction.All herpesviruses have a tegument, a layer of protein located between the virus membrane and the capsid. Depending on the virus species, the tegument can be 20 to 40 nm in thickness, and it may be uniformly or asymmetrically distributed about the capsid (7, 17, 24, 33). The tegument is composed predominantly of virus-encoded proteins that together can account for up to half or more of the total virion protein mass. Tegument proteins are thought to be those involved in the early stages of infection before progeny virus proteins are synthesized.The tegument has been most thoroughly studied in herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1). Examination of virions by electron microscopy has demonstrated that the tegument is not highly structured. Its morphology is described as predominantly granular with fibrous elements also present (7, 19). Analysis by cryo-electron microscopy, followed by icosahedral reconstruction has shown that the tegument is not icosahedrally ordered, although a small amount of tegument density is observed close to the capsid surface at the pentons (3, 47).The HSV-1 tegument is composed of approximately 20 distinct, virus-encoded protein species whose amounts vary considerably. The predominant components are UL47, UL48, and UL49, each of which occurs in more than 800 copies per virion (8, 46). In contrast, others, such as RL2 (ICP0), RS1 (ICP4), UL36, and UL37, occur in ∼100 copies or less. Trace amounts of host cell-encoded proteins are also present (15). Many of the tegument proteins are required for virus replication (34), and functions have been defined for most (9, 12, 31, 40).Biochemical studies have demonstrated that the tegument makes noncovalent contacts with both the virus capsid and the membrane. Studies of capsid-tegument contacts have emphasized binding of UL36, a tegument protein, to UL25, a capsid protein located near the vertices and involved in DNA encapsidation (5, 20, 29). Other tegument proteins such as UL48 (VP16), UL37, and UL49 (VP22) are found to associate with UL36 and may be bound to the capsid indirectly by way of UL36 (13, 44). UL16 binds reversibly to the capsid while UL46 (VP11/12) has been shown to bind to both the membrane and the capsid (21, 22, 26). Binding of tegument proteins to the membrane has been shown to occur by way of attachment to UL11 (45) and also to the internal domains of membrane glycoproteins, including glycoprotein D (gD), gH, and gE (4, 6, 11).We describe here the results of a study in which electron microscopy and protein analysis were used to clarify the structure of the HSV-1 tegument and its attachment to the capsid. The study was designed to extend the observation that most of the HSV-1 tegument remains attached to the capsid when the membrane is removed from the virus by treatment with nonionic detergent (19). Cell-associated and extracellular virions were compared after treatment with Triton X-100 (TX-100).     

Effects of Major Capsid Proteins,Capsid Assembly,and DNA Cleavage/Packaging on the pUL17/pUL25 Complex of Herpes Simplex Virus 1

The U_L17 and U_L25 proteins (pU_L17 and pU_L25, respectively) of herpes simplex virus 1 are located at the external surface of capsids and are essential for DNA packaging and DNA retention in the capsid, respectively. The current studies were undertaken to determine whether DNA packaging or capsid assembly affected the pU_L17/pU_L25 interaction. We found that pU_L17 and pU_L25 coimmunoprecipitated from cells infected with wild-type virus, whereas the major capsid protein VP5 (encoded by the U_L19 gene) did not coimmunoprecipitate with these proteins under stringent conditions. In addition, pU_L17 (i) coimmunoprecipitated with pU_L25 in the absence of other viral proteins, (ii) coimmunoprecipitated with pU_L25 from lysates of infected cells in the presence or absence of VP5, (iii) did not coimmunoprecipitate efficiently with pU_L25 in the absence of the triplex protein VP23 (encoded by the U_L18 gene), (iv) required pU_L25 for proper solubilization and localization within the viral replication compartment, (v) was essential for the sole nuclear localization of pU_L25, and (vi) required capsid proteins VP5 and VP23 for nuclear localization and normal levels of immunoreactivity in an indirect immunofluorescence assay. Proper localization of pU_L25 in infected cell nuclei required pU_L17, pU_L32, and the major capsid proteins VP5 and VP23, but not the DNA packaging protein pU_L15. The data suggest that VP23 or triplexes augment the pU_L17/pU_L25 interaction and that VP23 and VP5 induce conformational changes in pU_L17 and pU_L25, exposing epitopes that are otherwise partially masked in infected cells. These conformational changes can occur in the absence of DNA packaging. The data indicate that the pU_L17/pU_L25 complex requires multiple viral proteins and functions for proper localization and biochemical behavior in the infected cell.Immature herpes simplex virus (HSV) capsids, like those of all herpesviruses, consist of two protein shells. The outer shell comprises 150 hexons, each composed of six copies of VP5, and 11 pentons, each containing five copies of VP5 (23, 29, 47). One vertex of fivefold symmetry is composed of 12 copies of the protein encoded by the U_L6 gene and serves as the portal through which DNA is inserted (22, 39). The pentons and hexons are linked together by 320 triplexes composed of two copies of the U_L18 gene product, VP23, and one copy of the U_L38 gene product, VP19C (23). Each triplex arrangement has two arms contacting neighboring VP5 subunits (47). The internal shell of the capsid consists primarily of more than 1,200 copies of the scaffold protein ICP35 (VP22a) and a smaller number of protease molecules encoded by the U_L26 open reading frame, which self-cleaves to form VP24 and VP21 derived from the amino and carboxyl termini, respectively (11, 12, 19, 25; reviewed in reference 31). The outer shell is virtually identical in the three capsid types found in HSV-infected cells, termed types A, B, and C (5, 6, 7, 29, 43, 48). It is believed that all three are derived from the immature procapsid (21, 38). Type C capsids contain DNA in place of the internal shell, type B capsids contain both shells, and type A capsids consist only of the outer shell (15, 16). Cleavage of viral DNA to produce type C capsids requires not only the portal protein, but all of the major capsid proteins and the products of the U_L15, U_L17, U_L28, U_L32, and U_L33 genes (2, 4, 10, 18, 26, 28, 35, 46). Only C capsids go on to become infectious virions (27).The outer capsid shell contains minor capsid proteins encoded by the U_L25 and U_L17 open reading frames (1, 17, 20). These proteins are located on the external surface of the viral capsid (24, 36, 44) and are believed to form a heterodimer arranged as a linear structure, termed the C capsid-specific complex (CCSC), located between pentons and hexons (41). This is consistent with the observation that levels of pU_L25 are increased in C capsids as opposed to in B capsids (30). On the other hand, other studies have indicated that at least some U_L17 and U_L25 proteins (pU_L17 and pU_L25, respectively) associate with all capsid types, and pU_L17 can associate with enveloped light particles, which lack capsid and capsid proteins but contain a number of viral tegument proteins (28, 36, 37). How the U_L17 and U_L25 proteins attach to capsids is not currently known, although the structure of the CCSC suggests extensive contact with triplexes (41). It is also unclear when pU_L17 and pU_L25 become incorporated into the capsid during the assembly pathway. Less pU_L25 associates with pU_L17(−) capsids, suggesting that the two proteins bind capsids either cooperatively or sequentially, although this could also be consequential to the fact that less pU_L25 associates with capsids lacking DNA (30, 36).Both pU_L25 and pU_L17 are necessary for proper nucleocapsid assembly, but their respective deletion generates different phenotypes. Deletion of pU_L17 precludes DNA packaging and induces capsid aggregation in the nuclei of infected cells, suggesting a critical early function (28, 34), whereas deletion of pU_L25 precludes correct cleavage or retention of full-length cleaved DNA within the capsid (8, 20, 32), thus suggesting a critical function later in the assembly pathway.The current studies were undertaken to determine how pU_L17 and pU_L25 associate with capsids by studying their interaction and localization in the presence and absence of other capsid proteins.     

Role of Complex Carbohydrates in Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Infection and Resistance to Antibody Neutralization

Complex N-glycans flank the receptor binding sites of the outer domain of HIV-1 gp120, ostensibly forming a protective “fence” against antibodies. Here, we investigated the effects of rebuilding this fence with smaller glycoforms by expressing HIV-1 pseudovirions from a primary isolate in a human cell line lacking N-acetylglucosamine transferase I (GnTI), the enzyme that initiates the conversion of oligomannose N-glycans into complex N-glycans. Thus, complex glycans, including those that surround the receptor binding sites, are replaced by fully trimmed oligomannose stumps. Conversely, the untrimmed oligomannoses of the silent domain of gp120 are likely to remain unchanged. For comparison, we produced a mutant virus lacking a complex N-glycan of the V3 loop (N301Q). Both variants exhibited increased sensitivities to V3 loop-specific monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) and soluble CD4. The N301Q virus was also sensitive to “nonneutralizing” MAbs targeting the primary and secondary receptor binding sites. Endoglycosidase H treatment resulted in the removal of outer domain glycans from the GnTI- but not the parent Env trimers, and this was associated with a rapid and complete loss in infectivity. Nevertheless, the glycan-depleted trimers could still bind to soluble receptor and coreceptor analogs, suggesting a block in post-receptor binding conformational changes necessary for fusion. Collectively, our data show that the antennae of complex N-glycans serve to protect the V3 loop and CD4 binding site, while N-glycan stems regulate native trimer conformation, such that their removal can lead to global changes in neutralization sensitivity and, in extreme cases, an inability to complete the conformational rearrangements necessary for infection.The intriguing results of a recent clinical trial suggest that an effective HIV-1 vaccine may be possible (97). Optimal efficacy may require a component that induces broadly neutralizing antibodies (BNAbs) that can block virus infection by their exclusive ability to recognize the trimeric envelope glycoprotein (Env) spikes on particle surfaces (43, 50, 87, 90). Env is therefore at the center of vaccine design programs aiming to elicit effective humoral immune responses.The amino acid sequence variability of Env presents a significant challenge for researchers seeking to elicit broadly effective NAbs. Early sequence comparisons revealed, however, that the surface gp120 subunit can be divided into discrete variable and conserved domains (Fig. ​(Fig.1A)1A) (110), the latter providing some hope for broadly effective NAb-based vaccines. Indeed, the constraints on variability in the conserved domains of gp120 responsible for binding the host cell receptor CD4, and coreceptor, generally CCR5, provide potential sites of vulnerability. However, viral defense strategies, such as the conformational masking of conserved epitopes (57), have made the task of eliciting bNAbs extremely difficult.Open in a separate windowFIG. 1.Glycan biosynthesis and distribution on gp120 and gp41. (A) Putative carbohydrate modifications are shown on gp120 and gp41 secondary structures, based on various published works (26, 42, 63, 74, 119, 128). The gp120 outer domain is indicated, as are residues that form the SOS gp120-gp41 disulfide bridge. The outer domain is divided into neutralizing and silent faces. Symbols distinguish complex, oligomannose, and unknown glycans. Generally, the complex glycans of the outer domain line the receptor binding sites of the neutralizing face, while the oligomannose glycans of the outer domain protect the silent domain (105). Asterisks denote sequons that are unlikely to be utilized, including position 139 (42), position 189 (26, 42), position 406 (42, 74), and position 637 (42). Glycans shown in gray indicate when sequon clustering may lead to some remaining unused, e.g., positions 156 and 160 (42, 119), positions 386, 392, and 397 (42), and positions 611 and 616 (42). There is also uncertainty regarding some glycan identities: glycans at positions 188, 355, 397, and 448 are not classified as predominantly complex or oligomannose (26, 42, 63, 128). The number of mannose moieties on oligomannose glycans can vary, as can the number of antennae and sialic acids on complex glycans (77). The glycan at position 301 appears to be predominantly a tetra-antennary complex glycan, as is the glycan at position 88, while most other complex glycans are biantennary (26, 128). (B) Schematic of essential steps of glycan biosynthesis from the Man₉GlcNAc₂ precursor to a mature multiantennary complex glycan. Mannosidase I progressively removes mannose moieties from the precursor, in a process that can be inhibited by the drug kifunensine. GnTI then transfers a GlcNAc moiety to the D1 arm of the resulting Man₅GlcNAc₂ intermediate, creating a hybrid glycan. Mannose trimming of the D2 and D3 arms then allows additional GlcNAc moieties to be added by a series of GnT family enzymes to form multiantennary complexes. This process can be inhibited by swainsonine. The antennae are ultimately capped and decorated by galactose and sialic acid. Hybrid and complex glycans are usually fucosylated at the basal GlcNAc, rendering them resistant to endo H digestion. However, NgF is able to remove all types of glycan.Carbohydrates provide a layer of protection against NAb attack (Fig. ​(Fig.1A).1A). As glycans are considered self, antibody responses against them are thought to be regulated by tolerance mechanisms. Thus, a glycan network forms a nonimmunogenic “cloak,” protecting the underlying protein from antibodies (3, 13, 20, 29, 39, 54, 65, 67, 74, 85, 96, 98, 117, 119, 120). The extent of this protection can be illustrated by considering the ways in which glycans differ from typical amino acid side chains. First, N-linked glycans are much larger, with an average mass more than 20 times that of a typical amino acid R-group. They are also usually more flexible and may therefore affect a greater volume of surrounding space. In the more densely populated parts of gp120, the carbohydrate field may even be stabilized by sugar-sugar hydrogen bonds, providing even greater coverage (18, 75, 125).The process of N-linked glycosylation can result in diverse structures that may be divided into three categories: oligomannose, hybrid, and complex (56). Each category shares a common Man₃GlcNAc₂ pentasaccharide stem (where Man is mannose and GlcNAc is N-acetylglucosamine), to which up to six mannose residues are attached in oligomannose N-glycans, while complex N-glycans are usually larger and may bear various sizes and numbers of antennae (Fig. ​(Fig.1B).1B). Glycan synthesis begins in the endoplasmic reticulum, where N-linked oligomannose precursors (Glc₃Man₉GlcNAc₂; Glc is glucose) are transferred cotranslationally to the free amide of the asparagine in a sequon Asn-X-Thr/Ser, where X is not Pro (40). Terminal glucose and mannose moieties are then trimmed to yield Man₅GlcNAc₂ (Fig. ​(Fig.1B).1B). Conversion to a hybrid glycan is then initiated by N-acetylglucosamine transferase I (GnTI), which transfers a GlcNAc moiety to the D1 arm of the Man₅GlcNAc₂ substrate (19) (Fig. ​(Fig.1B).1B). This hybrid glycoform is then a substrate for modification into complex glycans, in which the D2 and D3 arm mannose residues are replaced by complex antennae (19, 40, 56). Further enzymatic action catalyzes the addition of α-1-6-linked fucose moiety to the lower GlcNAc of complex glycan stems, but usually not to oligomannose glycan stems (Fig. ​(Fig.1B)1B) (21, 113).Most glycoproteins exhibit only fully mature complex glycans. However, the steric limitations imposed by the high density of glycans on some parts of gp120 lead to incomplete trimming, leaving “immature” oligomannose glycans (22, 26, 128). Spatial competition between neighboring sequons can sometimes lead to one or the other remaining unutilized, further distancing the final Env product from what might be expected based on its primary sequence (42, 48, 74, 119). An attempt to assign JR-FL gp120 and gp41 sequon use and types, based on various studies, is shown in Fig. ​Fig.1A1A (6, 26, 34, 35, 42, 63, 71, 74, 119, 128). At some positions, the glycan type is conserved. For example, the glycan at residue N301 has consistently been found to be complex (26, 63, 128). At other positions, considerable heterogeneity exists in the glycan populations, in some cases to the point where it is difficult to unequivocally assign them as predominantly complex or oligomannose. The reasons for these uncertainties might include incomplete trimming (42), interstrain sequence variability, the form of Env (e.g., gp120 or gp140), and the producer cell. The glycans of native Env trimers and monomeric gp120 may differ due to the constraints imposed by oligomerization (32, 41, 77). Thus, although all the potential sequons of HXB2 gp120 were found to be occupied in one study (63), some are unutilized or variably utilized on functional trimers, presumably due to steric limitations (42, 48, 75, 96, 119).The distribution of complex and oligomannose glycans on gp120 largely conforms with an antigenic map derived from structural models (59, 60, 102, 120), in which the outer domain is divided into a neutralizing face and an immunologically silent face. Oligomannose glycans cluster tightly on the silent face of gp120 (18, 128), while complex glycans flank the gp120 receptor binding sites of the neutralizing face, ostensibly forming a protective “fence” against NAbs (105). The relatively sparse clustering of complex glycans that form this fence may reflect a trade-off between protecting the underlying functional domains from NAbs by virtue of large antennae while at the same time permitting sufficient flexibility for the refolding events associated with receptor binding and fusion (29, 39, 67, 75, 98, 117). Conversely, the dense clustering of oligomannose glycans on the silent domain may be important for ensuring immune protection and/or in creating binding sites for lectins such as DC-SIGN (9, 44).The few available broadly neutralizing monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) define sites of vulnerability on Env trimers (reviewed in reference 52). They appear to fall into two general categories: those that access conserved sites by overcoming Env''s various evasion strategies and, intriguingly, those that exploit these very defensive mechanisms. Regarding the first category, MAb b12 recognizes an epitope that overlaps the CD4 binding site of gp120 (14), and MAbs 2F5 and 4E10 (84, 129) recognize adjacent epitopes of the membrane-proximal external region (MPER) at the C-terminal ectodomain of gp41. The variable neutralizing potencies of these MAbs against primary isolates that contain their core epitopes illustrate how conformational masking can dramatically regulate their exposure (11, 118). Conformational masking also limits the activities of MAbs directed to the V3 loop and MAbs whose epitopes overlap the coreceptor binding site (11, 62, 121).A second category of MAbs includes MAb 2G12, which recognizes a tight cluster of glycans in the silent domain of gp120 (16, 101, 103, 112). This epitope has recently sparked considerable interest in exploiting glycan clusters as possible carbohydrate-based vaccines (2, 15, 31, 70, 102, 116). Two recently described MAbs, PG9 and PG16 (L. M. Walker and D. R. Burton, unpublished data), also target epitopes regulated by the presence of glycans that involve conserved elements of the second and third variable loops and depend largely on the quaternary trimer structure and its in situ presentation on membranes. Their impressive breadth and potency may come from the fact that they target the very mechanisms (variable loops and glycans) that are generally thought to protect the virus from neutralization. Like 2G12, these epitopes are likely to be constitutively exposed and thus may not be subject to conformational masking (11, 118).The above findings reveal the importance of N-glycans both as a means of protection against neutralization as well as in directly contributing to unique neutralizing epitopes. Clearly, further studies on the nature and function of glycans in native Env trimers are warranted. Possible approaches may be divided into four categories, namely, (i) targeted mutation, (ii) enzymatic removal, (iii) expression in the presence of glycosylation inhibitors, and (iv) expression in mutant cell lines with engineered blocks in the glycosylation pathway. Much of the available information on the functional roles of glycans in HIV-1 and simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) infection has come from the study of mutants that eliminate glycans either singly or in combination (20, 54, 66, 71, 74, 91, 95, 96). Most mutants of this type remain at least partially functional (74, 95, 96). In some cases these mutants have little effect on neutralization sensitivity, while in others they can lead to increased sensitivity to MAbs specific for the V3 loop and CD4 binding site (CD4bs) (54, 71, 72, 74, 106). In exceptional cases, increased sensitivity to MAbs targeting the coreceptor binding site and/or the gp41 MPER has been observed (54, 66, 72, 74).Of the remaining approaches for studying the roles of glycans, enzymatic removal is constrained by the extreme resistance of native Env trimers to many common glycosidases, contrasting with the relative sensitivity of soluble gp120 (67, 76, 101). Alternatively, drugs can be used to inhibit various stages of mammalian glycan biosynthesis. Notable examples are imino sugars, such as N-butyldeoxynojirimycin (NB-DNJ), that inhibit the early trimming of the glucose moieties from Glc₃Man₉GlcNAc₂ precursors in the endoplasmic reticulum (28, 38, 51). Viruses produced in the presence of these drugs may fail to undergo proper gp160 processing or fusion (37, 51). Other classes of inhibitor include kifunensine and swainsonine, which, respectively, inhibit the trimming of the Man₉GlcNAc₂ precursor into Man₅GlcNAc₂ or inhibit the removal of remaining D2 and D3 arm mannoses from the hybrid glycans, thus preventing the construction of complex glycan antennae (Fig. ​(Fig.1B)1B) (17, 33, 76, 104, 119). Unlike NB-DNJ, viruses produced in the presence of these drugs remain infectious (36, 76, 79, 100).Yet another approach is to express virus in insect cells that can only modify proteins with paucimannose N-glycans (58). However, the inefficient gp120/gp41 processing by furin-like proteases in these cells prevents their utility in functional studies (123). Another option is provided by ricin-selected GnTI-deficient cell lines that cannot transfer GlcNAc onto the mannosidase-trimmed Man₅GlcNAc₂ substrate, preventing the formation of hybrid and complex carbohydrates (Fig. ​(Fig.1B)1B) (17, 32, 36, 94). This arrests glycan processing at a well-defined point, leading to the substitution of complex glycans with Man₅GlcNAc₂ rather than with the larger Man₉GlcNAc₂ precursors typically obtained with kifunensine treatment (17, 32, 33, 104). With this in mind, here we produced HIV-1 pseudoviruses in GnTI-deficient cells to investigate the role of complex glycan antennae in viral resistance neutralization. By replacing complex glycans with smaller Man₅GlcNAc₂ we can determine the effect of “lowering the glycan fence” that surrounds the receptor binding sites, compared to the above-mentioned studies of individual glycan deletion mutants, whose effects are analogous to removing a fence post. Furthermore, since oligomannose glycans are sensitive to certain enzymes, such as endoglycosidase H (endo H), we investigated the effect of dismantling the glycan fence on Env function and stability. Our results suggest that the antennae of complex glycans protect against certain specificities but that glycan stems regulate trimer conformation with often more dramatic consequences for neutralization sensitivity and in extreme cases, infectious function.     

Low Endocytic pH and Capsid Protein Autocleavage Are Critical Components of Flock House Virus Cell Entry

The process by which nonenveloped viruses cross cell membranes during host cell entry remains poorly defined; however, common themes are emerging. Here, we use correlated in vivo and in vitro studies to understand the mechanism of Flock House virus (FHV) entry and membrane penetration. We demonstrate that low endocytic pH is required for FHV infection, that exposure to acidic pH promotes FHV-mediated disruption of model membranes (liposomes), and particles exposed to low pH in vitro exhibit increased hydrophobicity. In addition, FHV particles perturbed by heating displayed a marked increase in liposome disruption, indicating that membrane-active regions of the capsid are exposed or released under these conditions. We also provide evidence that autoproteolytic cleavage, to generate the lipophilic γ peptide (4.4 kDa), is required for membrane penetration. Mutant, cleavage-defective particles failed to mediate liposome lysis, regardless of pH or heat treatment, suggesting that these particles are not able to expose or release the requisite membrane-active regions of the capsid, namely, the γ peptides. Based on these results, we propose an updated model for FHV entry in which (i) the virus enters the host cell by endocytosis, (ii) low pH within the endocytic pathway triggers the irreversible exposure or release of γ peptides from the virus particle, and (iii) the exposed/released γ peptides disrupt the endosomal membrane, facilitating translocation of viral RNA into the cytoplasm.Flock House virus (FHV), a nonenveloped, positive-sense RNA virus, has been employed as a model system in several important studies to address a wide range of biological questions (reviewed in reference 55). FHV has been instrumental in understanding virus structure and assembly (17, 19, 45), RNA replication (2, 3, 37), and specific packaging of the genome (33, 44, 53, 54). Studies of FHV infection in Drosophila melanogaster flies have provided valuable information about the antiviral innate immune response in invertebrate hosts (29, 57). FHV is also used in nanotechnology applications as an epitope-presenting platform to develop novel vaccines and medical therapies (31, 48). In this report, we use FHV as a model system to further elucidate the means by which nonenveloped viruses enter host cells and traverse cellular membranes.During cell entry enveloped and nonenveloped viral capsid proteins undergo structural rearrangements that enable the virus to breach the membrane bilayer, ultimately releasing the viral genome or nucleocapsid into the cytoplasm. These entry-related conformational changes have been well characterized for enveloped viruses, which use membrane fusion to cross membrane bilayers (reviewed in reference 59). However, the mechanisms nonenveloped viruses employ to breach cellular membranes are poorly defined. Recently, significant parallels in the mechanisms of cell entry have emerged for a diverse group of nonenveloped viruses. Specifically, programmed capsid disassembly and release of small membrane-interacting peptides appear to be a common theme (reviewed in references 4 and 50).The site of membrane penetration depends upon the route of virus entry into the cell. Viruses can enter host cells via several distinct pathways, including clathrin-mediated endocytosis, caveolae-mediated endocytosis, lipid raft-mediated endocytosis, and macropinocytosis (reviewed in reference 40). The two primary routes of virus entry are clathrin-mediated endocytosis, where viruses encounter an acidic environment, and caveolae-mediated endocytosis, which is pH neutral. Many nonenveloped viruses, including adenovirus (24, 52), parvovirus (6), and reovirus (34, 49), require acidic pH during entry. However, numerous nonenveloped viruses have acid-independent entry mechanisms, including rotavirus (28), polyomavirus (43), simian virus 40 (41, 51), and several members of the picornavirus family (7, 14, 32, 42).Upon reaching the appropriate site of membrane penetration, nonenveloped virus capsid proteins are triggered by cellular factors, such as receptor binding and/or exposure to low pH within endosomes, to undergo conformational changes necessary for membrane interactions. These tightly regulated structural rearrangements may include capsid disassembly, exposure of hydrophobic regions, and/or release of membrane-lytic factors. For example, low pH within endosomes triggers adenovirus capsid disassembly, leading to the release of the membrane lytic protein VI (24, 60). In contrast, poliovirus is activated for membrane penetration by a pH-independent mechanism. Receptor binding triggers the poliovirus capsid to undergo a conformational change, resulting in the exposure of the N terminus of VP1 and the release of VP4 (18, 23), both of which facilitate membrane interactions (20). Notably, even though some viruses, such as reovirus, enter cells via an acidic endocytic pathway, membrane penetration is not acid activated (16), indicating that exposure to low pH and membrane penetration are not always mutual events.The overall simplicity of the FHV capsid, composed of a single gene product, along with the wealth of available high-resolution structural information (reviewed in reference 45) make FHV an ideal candidate for understanding nonenveloped virus entry and infection. FHV, a member of the family Nodaviridae, is a nonenveloped insect virus with a bipartite RNA genome surrounded by an icosahedral protein capsid. The quasi-equivalent T=3 virion (∼300-Å diameter) is initially composed of 180 copies of a single coat precursor protein α (44 kDa). Following capsid assembly the α protein undergoes autocatalytic cleavage to generate two particle-associated cleavage products, a large N-terminal fragment, β (39 kDa), and a small C-terminal fragment, γ (4.4 kDa) (22), creating the infectious virion (46). Mutant FHV particles that do not undergo autocatalytic cleavage, and therefore cannot release the γ peptide, are not infectious (46). It has been hypothesized that these particles are noninfectious because they cannot mediate membrane penetration, but this has never been shown directly.The FHV X-ray structure revealed that the γ peptides were located inside the capsid shell with residues 364 to 385 forming amphipathic helices (19). Subsequent studies showed that the FHV capsid is dynamic, with γ transiently exposed to the exterior of the capsid (11). These findings led to a structure-based model of FHV membrane disruption in which the dynamic γ peptides are reversibly exposed to the surface of the capsid (11), “sampling” the environment until they encounter the appropriate cellular trigger. The virus is then activated to undergo an irreversible conformational change in which the γ helical bundles located at each fivefold axis are externalized and released from the virus particle (17, 19). Upon release, the γ pentameric helical bundles are predicted to insert into and create a local disruption of the membrane bilayer to allow the RNA to enter the cytoplasm (10).While biochemical and structural studies have provided the foundation for a model of FHV cell entry, more rigorous in vivo and in vitro studies are necessary to confirm the ideas put forth in this model. Here, we clarify the route of FHV entry and characterize the tightly regulated events required for FHV membrane penetration. We demonstrate for the first time that low endocytic pH is required for FHV infection, that acidic pH promotes FHV membrane penetration, and that particles exposed to low pH exhibit increased hydrophobicity. In addition, we provide evidence that mutant, cleavage-defective particles are blocked specifically at the membrane penetration step during cell entry. Taken together, these findings offer an experimentally supported model of FHV entry into host cells. In addition, these results add to the accumulating evidence that nonenveloped viruses employ common mechanisms to traverse cellular membranes.