Initiation factor IF2, thiostrepton and micrococcin prevent the binding of elongation factor G to the Escherichia coli ribosome

The bacterial translational GTPases (initiation factor IF2, elongation factors EF-G and EF-Tu and release factor RF3) are involved in all stages of translation, and evidence indicates that they bind to overlapping sites on the ribosome, whereupon GTP hydrolysis is triggered. We provide evidence for a common ribosomal binding site for EF-G and IF2. IF2 prevents the binding of EF-G to the ribosome, as shown by Western blot analysis and fusidic acid-stabilized EF-G.GDP.ribosome complex formation. Additionally, IF2 inhibits EF-G-dependent GTP hydrolysis on 70 S ribosomes. The antibiotics thiostrepton and micrococcin, which bind to part of the EF-G binding site and interfere with the function of the factor, also affect the function of IF2. While thiostrepton is a strong inhibitor of EF-G-dependent GTP hydrolysis, GTP hydrolysis by IF2 is stimulated by the drug. Micrococcin stimulates GTP hydrolysis by both factors. We show directly that these drugs act by destabilizing the interaction of EF-G with the ribosome, and provide evidence that they have similar effects on IF2.     

Coupling of GTP hydrolysis by elongation factor G to translocation and factor recycling on the ribosome

The translocation step of elongation entails the coordinated movement of tRNA and mRNA on the ribosome. Translocation is promoted by elongation factor G (EF-G) and accompanied by GTP hydrolysis, which affects both translocation and turnover of EF-G. Both reactions are much slower (50-100-fold) when GTP is replaced with non-hydrolyzable GTP analogues or GDP, indicating that the reaction rates are determined by conformational transitions induced by GTP hydrolysis. Compared to the rate of uncatalyzed, spontaneous translocation, ribosome binding of EF-G with any guanine nucleotide reduces the free energy of activation by about 18 kJ/mol, whereas GTP hydrolysis contributes another 10 kJ/mol. The acceleration by GTP hydrolysis is due to large decrease in activation enthalpy by about 30 kJ/mol, compared to the reaction with GTP analogues or GDP, whereas the activation entropy becomes unfavorable and is lowered by about 20 kJ/mol (37 degrees C). The data suggest that GTP hydrolysis induces, by a conformational change of EF-G, a rapid conformational rearrangement of the ribosome ("unlocking") which determines the rates of both tRNA-mRNA translocation and recycling of the factor.     

Release of ribosome-bound ribosome recycling factor by elongation factor G

Elongation factor G (EF-G) and ribosome recycling factor (RRF) disassemble post-termination complexes of ribosome, mRNA, and tRNA. RRF forms stable complexes with 70 S ribosomes and 50 S ribosomal subunits. Here, we show that EF-G releases RRF from 70 S ribosomal and model post-termination complexes but not from 50 S ribosomal subunit complexes. The release of bound RRF by EF-G is stimulated by GTP analogues. The EF-G-dependent release occurs in the presence of fusidic acid and viomycin. However, thiostrepton inhibits the release. RRF was shown to bind to EF-G-ribosome complexes in the presence of GTP with much weaker affinity, suggesting that EF-G may move RRF to this position during the release of RRF. On the other hand, RRF did not bind to EF-G-ribosome complexes with fusidic acid, suggesting that EF-G stabilized by fusidic acid does not represent the natural post-termination complex. In contrast, the complexes of ribosome, EF-G and thiostrepton could bind RRF, although with lower affinity. These results suggest that thiostrepton traps an intermediate complex having RRF on a position that clashes with the P/E site bound tRNA. Mutants of EF-G that are impaired for translocation fail to disassemble post-termination complexes and exhibit lower activity in releasing RRF. We propose that the release of ribosome-bound RRF by EF-G is required for post-termination complex disassembly. Before release from the ribosome, the position of RRF on the ribosome will change from the original A/P site to a new location that clashes with tRNA on the P/E site.     

GTPase activation of elongation factor EF‐Tu by the ribosome during decoding

We have used single‐particle reconstruction in cryo‐electron microscopy to determine a structure of the Thermus thermophilus ribosome in which the ternary complex of elongation factor Tu (EF‐Tu), tRNA and guanine nucleotide has been trapped on the ribosome using the antibiotic kirromycin. This represents the state in the decoding process just after codon recognition by tRNA and the resulting GTP hydrolysis by EF‐Tu, but before the release of EF‐Tu from the ribosome. Progress in sample purification and image processing made it possible to reach a resolution of 6.4 Å. Secondary structure elements in tRNA, EF‐Tu and the ribosome, and even GDP and kirromycin, could all be visualized directly. The structure reveals a complex conformational rearrangement of the tRNA in the A/T state and the interactions with the functionally important switch regions of EF‐Tu crucial to GTP hydrolysis. Thus, the structure provides insights into the molecular mechanism of signalling codon recognition from the decoding centre of the 30S subunit to the GTPase centre of EF‐Tu.     

Essential role of histidine 84 in elongation factor Tu for the chemical step of GTP hydrolysis on the ribosome

Elongation factor Tu (EF-Tu) is a GTP-binding protein that delivers aminoacyl-tRNA to the A site of the ribosome during protein synthesis. The mechanism of GTP hydrolysis in EF-Tu on the ribosome is poorly understood. It is known that mutations of a conserved histidine residue in the switch II region of the factor, His84 in Escherichia coli EF-Tu, impair GTP hydrolysis. However, the partial reaction which is directly affected by mutations of His84 was not identified and the effect on GTP hydrolysis was not quantified. Here, we show that the replacement of His84 with Ala reduces the rate constant of GTP hydrolysis more than 10(6)-fold, whereas the preceding steps of ternary complex binding to the ribosome, codon recognition and, most importantly, the GTPase activation step are affected only slightly. These results show that His84 plays a key role in the chemical step of GTP hydrolysis. Rate constants of GTP hydrolysis by wild-type EF-Tu, measured using the slowly hydrolyzable GTP analog, GTPgammaS, showed no dependence on pH, indicating that His84 does not act as a general base. We propose that the catalytic role of His84 is to stabilize the transition state of GTP hydrolysis by hydrogen bonding to the attacking water molecule or, possibly, the gamma-phosphate group of GTP.     

A bacterial elongation factor G homologue exclusively functions in ribosome recycling in the spirochaete Borrelia burgdorferi

Translation elongation factor G (EF‐G) in bacteria plays two distinct roles in different phases of the translation system. EF‐G catalyses the translocation of tRNAs on the ribosome in the elongation step, as well as the dissociation of the post‐termination state ribosome into two subunits in the recycling step. In contrast to this conventional view, it has very recently been demonstrated that the dual functions of bacterial EF‐G are distributed over two different EF‐G paralogues in human mitochondria. In the present study, we show that the same division of roles of EF‐G is also found in bacteria. Two EF‐G paralogues are found in the spirochaete Borrelia burgdorferi, EF‐G1 and EF‐G2. We demonstrate that EF‐G1 is a translocase, while EF‐G2 is an exclusive recycling factor. We further demonstrate that B. burgdorferi EF‐G2 does not require GTP hydrolysis for ribosome disassembly, provided that translation initiation factor 3 (IF‐3) is present in the reaction. These results indicate that two B. burgdorferi EF‐G paralogues are close relatives to mitochondrial EF‐G paralogues rather than the conventional bacterial EF‐G, in both their phylogenetic and biochemical features.     

Specific interaction between the ribosome recycling factor and the elongation factor G from Mycobacterium tuberculosis mediates peptidyl-tRNA release and ribosome recycling in Escherichia coli

Once the translating ribosomes reach a termination codon, the nascent polypeptide chain is released in a factor-dependent manner. However, the P-site-bound deacylated tRNA and the ribosomes themselves remain bound to the mRNA (post-termination complex). The ribosome recycling factor (RRF) plays a vital role in dissociating this complex. Here we show that the Mycobacterium tuberculosis RRF (MtuRRF) fails to rescue Escherichia coli LJ14, a strain temperature-sensitive for RRF (frr(ts)). More interestingly, co-expression of M.tuberculosis elongation factor G (MtuEFG) with MtuRRF rescues the frr(ts) strain of E.coli. The simultaneous expression of MtuEFG is also needed to cause an enhanced release of peptidyl-tRNAs in E.coli by MtuRRF. These observations provide the first genetic evidence for a functional interaction between RRF and EFG. Both the in vivo and in vitro analyses suggest that RRF does not distinguish between the translating and terminating ribosomes for their dissociation from mRNA. In addition, complementation of E.coli PEM100 (fusA(ts)) with MtuEFG suggests that the mechanism of RRF function is independent of the translocation activity of EFG.     

Interactions of the release factor RF1 with the ribosome as revealed by cryo-EM

In eubacteria, termination of translation is signaled by any one of the stop codons UAA, UAG, and UGA moving into the ribosomal A site. Two release factors, RF1 and RF2, recognize and bind to the stop codons with different affinities and trigger the hydrolysis of the ester bond that links the polypeptide with the P-site tRNA. Cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) results obtained in this study show that ribosome-bound RF1 is in an open conformation, unlike the closed conformation observed in the crystal structure of the free factor, allowing its simultaneous access to both the decoding center and the peptidyl-transferase center. These results are similar to those obtained for RF2, but there is an important difference in how the factors bind to protein L11, which forms part of the GTPase-associated center of the large ribosomal subunit. The difference in the binding position, C-terminal domain for RF2 versus N-terminal domain for RF1, explains a body of L11 mutation studies that revealed differential effects on the activity of the two factors. Very recent data obtained with small-angle X-ray scattering now reveal that the solution structure of RF1 is open, as here seen on the ribosome by cryo-EM, and not closed, as seen in the crystal.     

Role of domains 4 and 5 in elongation factor G functions on the ribosome

Elongation factor G (EF-G) is a large, five domain GTPase that catalyses the translocation of the tRNAs on the bacterial ribosome at the expense of GTP. In the crystal structure of GDP-bound EF-G, domain 1 (G domain) makes direct contacts with domains 2 and 5, whereas domain 4 protrudes from the body of the molecule. Here, we show that the presence of both domains 4 and 5 is essential for tRNA translocation and for the turnover of the factor on the ribosome, but not for rapid single-round GTP hydrolysis by EF-G. Replacement of a highly conserved histidine residue at the tip of domain 4, His583, with lysine or arginine decreases the rate of tRNA translocation at least 100-fold, whereas the binding of the factor to the ribosome, GTP hydrolysis and P(i) release are not affected by the mutations. Various small deletions in the tip region of domain 4 decrease the translocation activity of EF-G even further, but do not block the turnover of the factor. Unlike native EF-G, the mutants of EF-G lacking domains 4/5 do not interact with the alpha-sarcin stem-loop of 23 S rRNA. These mutants are not released from the ribosome after GTP hydrolysis or translocation, indicating that the contact with, or a conformational change of, the alpha-sarcin stem-loop is required for EF-G release from the ribosome.     

Carboxyl-terminal amino acid residues in elongation factor G essential for ribosome association and translocation.

The translocation of ribosomes on mRNA is carried out by cellular machinery that has been extremely well conserved across the entire spectrum of living species. This process requires elongation factor G (EF-G, or EF-2 in archaebacteria and eukaryotes), which is a member of the GTPase superfamily. Using genetic techniques, we have identified a series of mutated alleles of fusA (the Escherichia coli gene that encodes EF-G) that were unable to support protein synthesis in vivo. These alleles encode proteins with point mutations at codons 495 (a variant with a Q-to-P change at codon 495 [Q495P]), 502 (G502D), and 563 (G563D) and a nonsense mutation at codon 608. Biochemical analyses demonstrated that EF-G Q495P, G502D, and delta 608-703 were not disrupted in guanine nucleotide binding but were deficient in ribosome-dependent GTP hydrolysis and guanine nucleotide-dependent ribosome association. We propose that all of these mutations are present in a domain that is essential for ribosome association and that GTP hydrolysis was deficient as a secondary consequence of impaired binding to 70S ribosomes.     

Brownian dynamics study of the association between the 70S ribosome and elongation factor G

Protein synthesis on the ribosome involves a number of external protein factors that bind at its functional sites. One key factor is the elongation factor G (EF-G) that facilitates the translocation of transfer RNAs between their binding sites, as well as advancement of the messenger RNA by one codon. The details of the EF-G/ribosome diffusional encounter and EF-G association pathway still remain unanswered. Here, we applied Brownian dynamics methodology to study bimolecular association in the bacterial EF-G/70S ribosome system. We estimated the EF-G association rate constants at 150 and 300 mM monovalent ionic strengths and obtained reasonable agreement with kinetic experiments. We have also elucidated the details of EF-G/ribosome association paths and found that positioning of the L11 protein of the large ribosomal subunit is likely crucial for EF-G entry to its binding site.     

Large-scale movement of elongation factor G and extensive conformational change of the ribosome during translocation

Elongation factor (EF) G promotes tRNA translocation on the ribosome. We present three-dimensional reconstructions, obtained by cryo-electron microscopy, of EF-G-ribosome complexes before and after translocation. In the pretranslocation state, domain 1 of EF-G interacts with the L7/12 stalk on the 50S subunit, while domain 4 contacts the shoulder of the 30S subunit in the region where protein S4 is located. During translocation, EF-G experiences an extensive reorientation, such that, after translocation, domain 4 reaches into the decoding center. The factor assumes different conformations before and after translocation. The structure of the ribosome is changed substantially in the pretranslocation state, in particular at the head-to-body junction in the 30S subunit, suggesting a possible mechanism of translocation.     

Interactions of translational factor EF-G with the bacterial ribosome before and after mRNA translocation

A conserved translation factor, known as EF-G in bacteria, promotes the translocation of tRNA and mRNA in the ribosome during protein synthesis. Here, EF-G.ribosome complexes in two intermediate states, before and after mRNA translocation, have been probed with hydroxyl radicals generated from free Fe(II)-EDTA. Before mRNA translocation and GTP hydrolysis, EF-G protected a limited set of nucleotides in both subunits of the ribosome from cleavage by hydroxyl radicals. In this state, an extensive set of nucleotides, in the platform and head domains of the 30S subunit and in the L7/L12 stalk region of the 50S subunit, became more exposed to hydroxyl radical attack, suggestive of conformational changes in these domains. Following mRNA translocation, EF-G protected a larger set of nucleotides (23S rRNA helices H43, H44, H89, and H95; 16S rRNA helices h5 and h15). No nucleotide with enhanced reactivity to hydroxyl radicals was detected in this latter state. Both before and after mRNA translocation, EF-G protected identical nucleotides in h5 and h15 of the 30S subunit. These results suggest that h5 and h15 may remain associated with EF-G during the dynamic course of the translocation mechanism. Nucleotides in H43 and H44 of the 50S subunit were protected only after translocation and GTP hydrolysis, suggesting that these helices interact dynamically with EF-G. The effects in H95 suggest that EF-G interacts weakly with H95 before mRNA translocation and strongly and more extensively with this helix following mRNA translocation.     

Elongation factor G with effector loop from elongation factor Tu is inactive in translocation

Elongation factors Tu and G (EF-Tu and EF-G) alternately interact with the ribosome during the elongation phase of protein biosynthesis. The function of both factors depends on GTP binding, and the factors are ascribed to a superfamily of G-proteins. All G-proteins contain the effector loop, a structural element that is important for the protein's interaction with its target molecule. In this study the effector loop of EF-G was replaced by the loop taken from EF-Tu. The EF-G with EF-Tu loop has markedly decreased GTPase activity and did not catalyze translocation. We conclude that these loops are not functionally interchangeable since the factors interact with different states of the ribosome.     

Conformationally restricted elongation factor G retains GTPase activity but is inactive in translocation on the ribosome

Elongation factor G (EF-G) from Escherichia coli is a large, five-domain GTPase that promotes tRNA translocation on the ribosome. Full activity requires GTP hydrolysis, suggesting that a conformational change of the factor is important for function. To restrict the intramolecular mobility, two cysteine residues were engineered into domains 1 and 5 of EF-G that spontaneously formed a disulfide cross-link. Cross-linked EF-G retained GTPase activity on the ribosome, whereas it was inactive in translocation as well as in turnover. Both activities were restored when the cross-link was reversed by reduction. These results strongly argue against a GTPase switch-type model of EF-G function and demonstrate that conformational mobility is an absolute requirement for EF-G function on the ribosome.     

Complementary roles of initiation factor 1 and ribosome recycling factor in 70S ribosome splitting

We demonstrate that ribosomes containing a messenger RNA (mRNA) with a strong Shine-Dalgarno sequence are rapidly split into subunits by initiation factors 1 (IF1) and 3 (IF3), but slowly split by ribosome recycling factor (RRF) and elongation factor G (EF-G). Post-termination-like (PTL) ribosomes containing mRNA and a P-site-bound deacylated transfer RNA (tRNA) are split very rapidly by RRF and EF-G, but extremely slowly by IF1 and IF3. Vacant ribosomes are split by RRF/EF-G much more slowly than PTL ribosomes and by IF1/IF3 much more slowly than mRNA-containing ribosomes. These observations reveal complementary splitting of different ribosomal complexes by IF1/IF3 and RRF/EF-G, and suggest the existence of two major pathways for ribosome splitting into subunits in the living cell. We show that the identity of the deacylated tRNA in the PTL ribosome strongly affects the rate by which it is split by RRF/EF-G and that IF3 is involved in the mechanism of ribosome splitting by IF1/IF3 but not by RRF/EF-G. With support from our experimental data, we discuss the principally different mechanisms of ribosome splitting by IF1/IF3 and by RRF/EF-G.     

Arginines 29 and 59 of elongation factor G are important for GTP hydrolysis or translocation on the ribosome

GTP hydrolysis by elongation factor G (EF-G) is essential for the translocation step in protein elongation. The low intrinsic GTPase activity of EF-G is strongly stimulated by the ribosome. Here we show that a conserved arginine, R29, of Escherichia coli EF-G is crucial for GTP hydrolysis on the ribosome, but not for GTP binding or ribosome interaction, suggesting that it may be directly involved in catalysis. Another conserved arginine, R59, which is homologous to the catalytic arginine of G(alpha) proteins, is not essential for GTP hydrolysis, but influences ribosome binding and translocation. These results indicate that EF-G is similar to other GTPases in that an arginine residue is required for GTP hydrolysis, although the structural changes leading to GTPase activation are different.     

A central interdomain protein joint in elongation factor G regulates antibiotic sensitivity, GTP hydrolysis, and ribosome translocation

The antibiotic fusidic acid potently inhibits bacterial translation (and cellular growth) by lodging between domains I and III of elongation factor G (EF-G) and preventing release of EF-G from the ribosome. We examined the functions of key amino acid residues near the active site of EF-G that interact with fusidic acid and regulate hydrolysis of GTP. Alanine mutants of these residues spontaneously hydrolyzed GTP in solution, bypassing the normal activating role of the ribosome. A conserved phenylalanine in the switch II element of EF-G was important for suppressing GTP hydrolysis in solution and critical for catalyzing translocation of the ribosome along mRNA. These experimental results reveal the multipurpose roles of an interdomain joint in the heart of an essential translation factor that can both promote and inhibit bacterial translation.