A New Borrelia Species Defined by Multilocus Sequence Analysis of Housekeeping Genes

Analysis of Lyme borreliosis (LB) spirochetes, using a novel multilocus sequence analysis scheme, revealed that OspA serotype 4 strains (a rodent-associated ecotype) of Borrelia garinii were sufficiently genetically distinct from bird-associated B. garinii strains to deserve species status. We suggest that OspA serotype 4 strains be raised to species status and named Borrelia bavariensis sp. nov. The rooted phylogenetic trees provide novel insights into the evolutionary history of LB spirochetes.Multilocus sequence typing (MLST) and multilocus sequence analysis (MLSA) have been shown to be powerful and pragmatic molecular methods for typing large numbers of microbial strains for population genetics studies, delineation of species, and assignment of strains to defined bacterial species (4, 13, 27, 40, 44). To date, MLST/MLSA schemes have been applied only to a few vector-borne microbial populations (1, 6, 30, 37, 40, 41, 47).Lyme borreliosis (LB) spirochetes comprise a diverse group of zoonotic bacteria which are transmitted among vertebrate hosts by ixodid (hard) ticks. The most common agents of human LB are Borrelia burgdorferi (sensu stricto), Borrelia afzelii, Borrelia garinii, Borrelia lusitaniae, and Borrelia spielmanii (7, 8, 12, 35). To date, 15 species have been named within the group of LB spirochetes (6, 31, 32, 37, 38, 41). While several of these LB species have been delineated using whole DNA-DNA hybridization (3, 20, 33), most ecological or epidemiological studies have been using single loci (5, 9-11, 29, 34, 36, 38, 42, 51, 53). Although some of these loci have been convenient for species assignment of strains or to address particular epidemiological questions, they may be unsuitable to resolve evolutionary relationships among LB species, because it is not possible to define any outgroup. For example, both the 5S-23S intergenic spacer (5S-23S IGS) and the gene encoding the outer surface protein A (ospA) are present only in LB spirochete genomes (36, 43). The advantage of using appropriate housekeeping genes of LB group spirochetes is that phylogenetic trees can be rooted with sequences of relapsing fever spirochetes. This renders the data amenable to detailed evolutionary studies of LB spirochetes.LB group spirochetes differ remarkably in their patterns and levels of host association, which are likely to affect their population structures (22, 24, 46, 48). Of the three main Eurasian Borrelia species, B. afzelii is adapted to rodents, whereas B. valaisiana and most strains of B. garinii are maintained by birds (12, 15, 16, 23, 26, 45). However, B. garinii OspA serotype 4 strains in Europe have been shown to be transmitted by rodents (17, 18) and, therefore, constitute a distinct ecotype within B. garinii. These strains have also been associated with high pathogenicity in humans, and their finer-scale geographical distribution seems highly focal (10, 34, 52, 53).In this study, we analyzed the intra- and interspecific phylogenetic relationships of B. burgdorferi, B. afzelii, B. garinii, B. valaisiana, B. lusitaniae, B. bissettii, and B. spielmanii by means of a novel MLSA scheme based on chromosomal housekeeping genes (30, 48).     

Alignment of the c-Type Cytochrome OmcS along Pili of Geobacter sulfurreducens

Immunogold localization revealed that OmcS, a cytochrome that is required for Fe(III) oxide reduction by Geobacter sulfurreducens, was localized along the pili. The apparent spacing between OmcS molecules suggests that OmcS facilitates electron transfer from pili to Fe(III) oxides rather than promoting electron conduction along the length of the pili.There are multiple competing/complementary models for extracellular electron transfer in Fe(III)- and electrode-reducing microorganisms (8, 18, 20, 44). Which mechanisms prevail in different microorganisms or environmental conditions may greatly influence which microorganisms compete most successfully in sedimentary environments or on the surfaces of electrodes and can impact practical decisions on the best strategies to promote Fe(III) reduction for bioremediation applications (18, 19) or to enhance the power output of microbial fuel cells (18, 21).The three most commonly considered mechanisms for electron transfer to extracellular electron acceptors are (i) direct contact between redox-active proteins on the outer surfaces of the cells and the electron acceptor, (ii) electron transfer via soluble electron shuttling molecules, and (iii) the conduction of electrons along pili or other filamentous structures. Evidence for the first mechanism includes the necessity for direct cell-Fe(III) oxide contact in Geobacter species (34) and the finding that intensively studied Fe(III)- and electrode-reducing microorganisms, such as Geobacter sulfurreducens and Shewanella oneidensis MR-1, display redox-active proteins on their outer cell surfaces that could have access to extracellular electron acceptors (1, 2, 12, 15, 27, 28, 31-33). Deletion of the genes for these proteins often inhibits Fe(III) reduction (1, 4, 7, 15, 17, 28, 40) and electron transfer to electrodes (5, 7, 11, 33). In some instances, these proteins have been purified and shown to have the capacity to reduce Fe(III) and other potential electron acceptors in vitro (10, 13, 29, 38, 42, 43, 48, 49).Evidence for the second mechanism includes the ability of some microorganisms to reduce Fe(III) that they cannot directly contact, which can be associated with the accumulation of soluble substances that can promote electron shuttling (17, 22, 26, 35, 36, 47). In microbial fuel cell studies, an abundance of planktonic cells and/or the loss of current-producing capacity when the medium is replaced is consistent with the presence of an electron shuttle (3, 14, 26). Furthermore, a soluble electron shuttle is the most likely explanation for the electrochemical signatures of some microorganisms growing on an electrode surface (26, 46).Evidence for the third mechanism is more circumstantial (19). Filaments that have conductive properties have been identified in Shewanella (7) and Geobacter (41) species. To date, conductance has been measured only across the diameter of the filaments, not along the length. The evidence that the conductive filaments were involved in extracellular electron transfer in Shewanella was the finding that deletion of the genes for the c-type cytochromes OmcA and MtrC, which are necessary for extracellular electron transfer, resulted in nonconductive filaments, suggesting that the cytochromes were associated with the filaments (7). However, subsequent studies specifically designed to localize these cytochromes revealed that, although the cytochromes were extracellular, they were attached to the cells or in the exopolymeric matrix and not aligned along the pili (24, 25, 30, 40, 43). Subsequent reviews of electron transfer to Fe(III) in Shewanella oneidensis (44, 45) appear to have dropped the nanowire concept and focused on the first and second mechanisms.Geobacter sulfurreducens has a number of c-type cytochromes (15, 28) and multicopper proteins (12, 27) that have been demonstrated or proposed to be on the outer cell surface and are essential for extracellular electron transfer. Immunolocalization and proteolysis studies demonstrated that the cytochrome OmcB, which is essential for optimal Fe(III) reduction (15) and highly expressed during growth on electrodes (33), is embedded in the outer membrane (39), whereas the multicopper protein OmpB, which is also required for Fe(III) oxide reduction (27), is exposed on the outer cell surface (39).OmcS is one of the most abundant cytochromes that can readily be sheared from the outer surfaces of G. sulfurreducens cells (28). It is essential for the reduction of Fe(III) oxide (28) and for electron transfer to electrodes under some conditions (11). Therefore, the localization of this important protein was further investigated.     

Widely Conserved Recombination Patterns among Single-Stranded DNA Viruses

The combinatorial nature of genetic recombination can potentially provide organisms with immediate access to many more positions in sequence space than can be reached by mutation alone. Recombination features particularly prominently in the evolution of a diverse range of viruses. Despite rapid progress having been made in the characterization of discrete recombination events for many species, little is currently known about either gross patterns of recombination across related virus families or the underlying processes that determine genome-wide recombination breakpoint distributions observable in nature. It has been hypothesized that the networks of coevolved molecular interactions that define the epistatic architectures of virus genomes might be damaged by recombination and therefore that selection strongly influences observable recombination patterns. For recombinants to thrive in nature, it is probably important that the portions of their genomes that they have inherited from different parents work well together. Here we describe a comparative analysis of recombination breakpoint distributions within the genomes of diverse single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) virus families. We show that whereas nonrandom breakpoint distributions in ssDNA virus genomes are partially attributable to mechanistic aspects of the recombination process, there is also a significant tendency for recombination breakpoints to fall either outside or on the peripheries of genes. In particular, we found significantly fewer recombination breakpoints within structural protein genes than within other gene types. Collectively, these results imply that natural selection acting against viruses expressing recombinant proteins is a major determinant of nonrandom recombination breakpoint distributions observable in most ssDNA virus families.Genetic recombination is a ubiquitous biological process that is both central to DNA repair pathways (10, 57) and an important evolutionary mechanism. By generating novel combinations of preexisting nucleotide polymorphisms, recombination can potentially accelerate evolution by increasing the population-wide genetic diversity upon which adaptive selection relies. Recombination can paradoxically also prevent the progressive accumulation of harmful mutations within individual genomes (18, 35, 53). Whereas its ability to defend high-fitness genomes from mutational decay possibly underlies the evolutionary value of sexuality in higher organisms, in many microbial species where pseudosexual genetic exchange is permissible among even highly divergent genomes, recombination can enable access to evolutionary innovations that would otherwise be inaccessible by mutation alone.Such interspecies recombination is fairly common in many virus families (8, 17, 27, 44, 82). It is becoming clear, however, that as with mutation events, most recombination events between distantly related genomes are maladaptive (5, 13, 38, 50, 63, 80). As genetic distances between parental genomes increase, so too does the probability of fitness defects in their recombinant offspring (16, 51). The viability of recombinants is apparently largely dependent on how severely recombination disrupts coevolved intragenome interaction networks (16, 32, 51). These networks include interacting nucleotide sequences that form secondary structures, sequence-specific protein-DNA interactions, interprotein interactions, and amino acid-amino acid interactions within protein three-dimensional folds.One virus family where such interaction networks appear to have a large impact on patterns of natural interspecies recombination are the single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) geminiviruses. As with other ssDNA viruses, recombination is very common among the species of this family (62, 84). Partially conserved recombination hot and cold spots have been detected in different genera (39, 81) and are apparently caused by both differential mechanistic predispositions of genome regions to recombination and natural selection disfavoring the survival of recombinants with disrupted intragenome interaction networks (38, 51).Genome organization and rolling circle replication (RCR)—the mechanism by which geminiviruses and many other ssDNA viruses replicate (9, 67, 79; see reference 24 for a review)—seem to have a large influence on basal recombination rates in different parts of geminivirus genomes (20, 33, 39, 61, 81). To initiate RCR, virion-strand ssDNA molecules are converted by host-mediated pathways into double-stranded “replicative-form” (RF) DNAs (34, 67). Initiated by a virus-encoded replication-associated protein (Rep) at a well-defined virion-strand replication origin (v-ori), new virion strands are synthesized on the complementary strand of RF DNAs (28, 73, 74) by host DNA polymerases. Virion-strand replication is concomitant with the displacement of old virion strands, which, once complete, yields covalently closed ssDNA molecules which are either encapsidated or converted into additional RF DNAs. Genome-wide basal recombination rates in ssDNA viruses are probably strongly influenced by the specific characteristics of host DNA polymerases that enable RCR. Interruption of RCR has been implicated directly in geminivirus recombination (40) and is most likely responsible for increased basal recombination rates both within genes transcribed in the opposite direction from that of virion-strand replication (40, 71) and at the v-ori (1, 9, 20, 69, 74).Whereas most ssDNA virus families replicate via either a rolling circle mechanism (the Nanoviridae, Microviridae, and Geminiviridae) (3, 23, 24, 31, 59, 67, 74) or a related rolling hairpin mechanism (the Parvoviridae) (25, 76), among the Circoviridae only the Circovirus genus is known to use RCR (45). Although the Gyrovirus genus (the other member of the Circoviridae) and the anelloviruses (a currently unclassified ssDNA virus group) might also use RCR, it is currently unknown whether they do or not (78). Additionally, some members of the Begomovirus genus of the Geminiviridae either have a second genome component, called DNA-B, or are associated with satellite ssDNA molecules called DNA-1 and DNA-Beta, all of which also replicate by RCR (1, 47, 68).Recombination is known to occur in the parvoviruses (19, 43, 70), microviruses (66), anelloviruses (40, 46), circoviruses (11, 26, 60), nanoviruses (30), geminivirus DNA-B components, and geminivirus satellite molecules (2, 62). Given that most, if not all, of these ssDNA replicons are evolutionarily related to and share many biological features with the geminiviruses (22, 31, 36), it is of interest to determine whether conserved recombination patterns observed in the geminiviruses (61, 81) are evident in these other groups. To date, no comparative analyses have ever been performed with different ssDNA virus families to identify, for example, possible influences of genome organization on recombination breakpoint distributions found in these viruses.Here we compare recombination frequencies and recombination breakpoint distributions in most currently described ssDNA viruses and satellite molecules and identify a number of sequence exchange patterns that are broadly conserved across this entire group.     

Haloferax volcanii Flagella Are Required for Motility but Are Not Involved in PibD-Dependent Surface Adhesion

Although the genome of Haloferax volcanii contains genes (flgA1-flgA2) that encode flagellins and others that encode proteins involved in flagellar assembly, previous reports have concluded that H. volcanii is nonmotile. Contrary to these reports, we have now identified conditions under which H. volcanii is motile. Moreover, we have determined that an H. volcanii deletion mutant lacking flagellin genes is not motile. However, unlike flagella characterized in other prokaryotes, including other archaea, the H. volcanii flagella do not appear to play a significant role in surface adhesion. While flagella often play similar functional roles in bacteria and archaea, the processes involved in the biosynthesis of archaeal flagella do not resemble those involved in assembling bacterial flagella but, instead, are similar to those involved in producing bacterial type IV pili. Consistent with this observation, we have determined that, in addition to disrupting preflagellin processing, deleting pibD, which encodes the preflagellin peptidase, prevents the maturation of other H. volcanii type IV pilin-like proteins. Moreover, in addition to abolishing swimming motility, and unlike the flgA1-flgA2 deletion, deleting pibD eliminates the ability of H. volcanii to adhere to a glass surface, indicating that a nonflagellar type IV pilus-like structure plays a critical role in H. volcanii surface adhesion.To escape toxic conditions or to acquire new sources of nutrients, prokaryotes often depend on some form of motility. Swimming motility, a common means by which many bacteria move from one place to another, usually depends on flagellar rotation to propel cells through liquid medium (24, 26, 34). These motility structures are also critical for the effective attachment of bacteria to surfaces.As in bacteria, rotating flagella are responsible for swimming motility in archaea, and recent studies suggest that archaea, like bacteria, also require flagella for efficient surface attachment (37, 58). However, in contrast to bacterial flagellar subunits, which are translocated via a specialized type III secretion apparatus, archaeal flagellin secretion and flagellum assembly resemble the processes used to translocate and assemble the subunits of bacterial type IV pili (34, 38, 54).Type IV pili are typically composed of major pilins, the primary structural components of the pilus, and several minor pilin-like proteins that play important roles in pilus assembly or function (15, 17, 46). Pilin precursor proteins are transported across the cytoplasmic membrane via the Sec translocation pathway (7, 20). Most Sec substrates contain either a class I or a class II signal peptide that is cleaved at a recognition site that lies subsequent to the hydrophobic portion of the signal peptide (18, 43). However, the precursors of type IV pilins contain class III signal peptides, which are processed at recognition sites that precede the hydrophobic domain by a prepilin-specific peptidase (SPase III) (38, 43, 45). Similarly, archaeal flagellin precursors contain a class III signal peptide that is processed by a prepilin-specific peptidase homolog (FlaK/PibD) (3, 8, 10, 11). Moreover, flagellar assembly involves homologs of components involved in the biosynthesis of bacterial type IV pili, including FlaI, an ATPase homologous to PilB, and FlaJ, a multispanning membrane protein that may provide a platform for flagellar assembly, similar to the proposed role for PilC in pilus assembly (38, 44, 53, 54). These genes, as well as a number of others that encode proteins often required for either flagellar assembly or function (flaCDEFG and flaH), are frequently coregulated with the flg genes (11, 26, 44, 54).Interestingly, most sequenced archaeal genomes also contain diverse sets of genes that encode type IV pilin-like proteins with little or no homology to archaeal flagellins (3, 39, 52). While often coregulated with pilB and pilC homologs, these genes are never found in clusters containing the motility-specific flaCDEFG and flaH homologs; however, the proteins they encode do contain class III signal peptides (52). Several of these proteins have been shown to be processed by an SPase III (4, 52). Moreover, in Sulfolobus solfataricus and Methanococcus maripaludis, some of these archaeal type IV pilin-like proteins were confirmed to form surface filaments that are distinct from the flagella (21, 22, 56). These findings strongly suggest that the genes encode subunits of pilus-like surface structures that are involved in functions other than swimming motility.In bacteria, type IV pili are multifunctional filamentous protein complexes that, in addition to facilitating twitching motility, mediate adherence to abiotic surfaces and make close intercellular associations possible (15, 17, 46). For instance, mating between Escherichia coli in liquid medium has been shown to require type IV pili (often referred to as thin sex pili), which bring cells into close proximity (29, 30, 57). Recent work has shown that the S. solfataricus pilus, Ups, is required not only for efficient adhesion to surfaces of these crenarchaeal cells but also for UV-induced aggregation (21, 22, 58). Frols et al. postulate that autoaggregation is required for DNA exchange under these highly mutagenic conditions (22). Halobacterium salinarum has also been shown to form Ca²⁺-induced aggregates (27, 28). Furthermore, conjugation has been observed in H. volcanii, which likely requires that cells be held in close proximity for a sustained period to allow time for the cells to construct the cytoplasmic bridges that facilitate DNA transfer between them (35).To determine the roles played by haloarchaeal flagella and other putative type IV pilus-like structures in swimming and surface motility, surface adhesion, autoaggregation, and conjugation, we constructed and characterized two mutant strains of H. volcanii, one lacking the genes that encode the flagellins and the other lacking pibD. Our analyses indicate that although this archaeon was previously thought to be nonmotile (14, 36), wild-type (wt) H. volcanii can swim in a flagellum-dependent manner. Consistent with the involvement of PibD in processing flagellins, the peptidase mutant is nonmotile. Unlike nonhalophilic archaea, however, the flagellum mutant can adhere to glass as effectively as the wild type. Conversely, the ΔpibD strain fails to adhere to glass surfaces, strongly suggesting that in H. volcanii surface adhesion involves nonflagellar, type IV pilus-like structures.     

Coexistence of Different Genotypes in the Same Bat and Serological Characterization of Rousettus Bat Coronavirus HKU9 Belonging to a Novel Betacoronavirus Subgroup

Rousettus bat coronavirus HKU9 (Ro-BatCoV HKU9), a recently identified coronavirus of novel Betacoronavirus subgroup D, from Leschenault''s rousette, was previously found to display marked sequence polymorphism among genomes of four strains. Among 10 bats with complete RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp), spike (S), and nucleocapsid (N) genes sequenced, three and two sequence clades for all three genes were codetected in two and five bats, respectively, suggesting the coexistence of two or three distinct genotypes of Ro-BatCoV HKU9 in the same bat. Complete genome sequencing of the distinct genotypes from two bats, using degenerate/genome-specific primers with overlapping sequences confirmed by specific PCR, supported the coexistence of at least two distinct genomes in each bat. Recombination analysis using eight Ro-BatCoV HKU9 genomes showed possible recombination events between strains from different bat individuals, which may have allowed for the generation of different genotypes. Western blot assays using recombinant N proteins of Ro-BatCoV HKU9, Betacoronavirus subgroup A (HCoV-HKU1), subgroup B (SARSr-Rh-BatCoV), and subgroup C (Ty-BatCoV HKU4 and Pi-BatCoV HKU5) coronaviruses were subgroup specific, supporting their classification as separate subgroups under Betacoronavirus. Antibodies were detected in 75 (43%) of 175 and 224 (64%) of 350 tested serum samples from Leschenault''s rousette bats by Ro-BatCoV HKU9 N-protein-based Western blot and enzyme immunoassays, respectively. This is the first report describing coinfection of different coronavirus genotypes in bats and coronavirus genotypes of diverse nucleotide variation in the same host. Such unique phenomena, and the unusual instability of ORF7a, are likely due to recombination which may have been facilitated by the dense roosting behavior and long foraging range of Leschenault''s rousette.Coronaviruses infect a wide variety of animals in which they can cause respiratory, enteric, hepatic, and neurological diseases of various severities. Based on genotypic and serological characterization, coronaviruses were traditionally classified into three distinct groups, groups 1, 2, and 3 (3, 27, 59). Recently, the Coronavirus Study Group of the International Committee for Taxonomy of Viruses has renamed the traditional group 1, 2, and 3 coronaviruses as Alphacoronavirus, Betacoronavirus, and Gammacoronavirus, respectively (http://talk.ictvonline.org/media/p/1230.aspx). Coronaviruses are known to have a high frequency of recombination as a result of their unique mechanism of viral replication (27). Such tendency for recombination and high mutation rates may allow them to adapt to new hosts and ecological niches (24, 47, 52).The severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) epidemic has boosted interest in the study of coronaviruses in humans and animals (21, 34, 38, 41, 54). In the past few years, there has been a dramatic increase in the number of newly described human and animal coronaviruses (2, 4, 5, 8-10, 15-20, 23, 25, 28, 30, 32, 35, 36, 39, 43, 45, 50, 51, 53, 56, 58). Two novel human coronaviruses, human coronavirus NL63 (HCoV-NL63) and human coronavirus HKU1 (HCoV-HKU1), belonging to Alphacoronavirus and Betacoronavirus, respectively, have been discovered, in addition to the human coronavirus OC43 (HCoV-OC43), human coronavirus 229E (HCoV-229E), and SARS coronavirus (SARS-CoV) (17, 29, 45, 53, 55). We have also previously described the discovery of a diversity of novel coronaviruses in wild bats and birds in China, including SARSr-Rh-BatCoV, belonging to Betacoronavirus subgroup B, from Chinese horseshoe bats (30, 48, 56). Among these novel coronaviruses, three avian coronaviruses were found to belong to a novel subgroup of Gammacoronavirus (Gammacoronavirus subgroup C), while three bat coronaviruses were found to belong to two novel subgroups of Betacoronavirus (Betacoronavirus subgroups C and D) (48, 50). Based on the presence of the huge diversity of coronaviruses in Alphacoronavirus and Betacoronavirus among various bat species, bats are likely the reservoir for the ancestor of these two coronavirus genera (47).During our genome analysis of these novel coronaviruses, one of them, Rousettus bat coronavirus HKU9 (Ro-BatCoV HKU9), belonging to Betacoronavirus subgroup D, which was identified in Leschenault''s rousette bats, was found to display marked nucleotide and amino acid sequence polymorphism among the four strains with complete genome sequences (50). In our study on HCoV-HKU1, it has been shown that such sequence polymorphisms may indicate the presence of different genotypes (52). By complete genome sequence analysis of the potentially different genotypes of HCoV-HKU1, we have demonstrated for the first time natural recombination in a human coronavirus, resulting in the generation of at least three genotypes (52). We have also recently shown that recombination between different strains of SARSr-Rh-BatCoV from different regions of China may have given rise to the emergence of civet SARSr-CoV (31). To investigate the presence of different genotypes of Ro-BatCoV HKU9, the complete RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp) (corresponding to nsp12), spike (S), and nucleocapsid (N) gene sequences of Ro-BatCoV HKU9 from 10 additional bats were determined. Since sequence analysis showed the possible coexistence of different genotypes in seven bat individuals, complete genome sequencing of these distinct genotypes from two bats was carried out to investigate for possible recombination events among the different genotypes. In addition, serological characterization of Ro-BatCoV HKU9 was also performed by Western blot and enzyme immunoassays using recombinant Ro-BatCoV HKU9 nucleocapsid proteins and recombinant nucleocapsid proteins of Betacoronavirus subgroup A, B, and C coronaviruses to determine possible cross-reactivity among the different Betacoronavirus subgroups and the seroepidemiology of Ro-BatCoV HKU9 in Leschenault''s rousette bats.     

Inhibiting the Initiation of Clostridium difficile Spore Germination using Analogs of Chenodeoxycholic Acid,a Bile Acid

To cause disease, Clostridium difficile spores must germinate in the host gastrointestinal tract. Germination is initiated upon exposure to glycine and certain bile acids, e.g., taurocholate. Chenodeoxycholate, another bile acid, inhibits taurocholate-mediated germination. By applying Michaelis-Menten kinetic analysis to C. difficile spore germination, we found that chenodeoxycholate is a competitive inhibitor of taurocholate-mediated germination and appears to interact with the spores with greater apparent affinity than does taurocholate. We also report that several analogs of chenodeoxycholate are even more effective inhibitors. Some of these compounds resist 7α-dehydroxylation by Clostridium scindens, a core member of the normal human colonic microbiota, suggesting that they are more stable than chenodeoxycholate in the colonic environment.Clostridium difficile is a Gram-positive, spore-forming, anaerobic bacterium that is pathogenic for both humans and animals (33, 44). Infections caused by C. difficile range from mild diarrhea to more life-threatening conditions, such as pseudomembranous colitis (33). In the classic case, prior antibiotic treatment that disrupts the normally protective colonic flora makes patients susceptible to C. difficile infection (CDI) (35, 53). Other antibiotics, such as vancomycin and metronidazole, are the most commonly used treatments for CDI (54). However, because these antibiotics also disrupt the colonic flora, 10 to 40% of patients whose symptoms have been ameliorated suffer from relapsing CDI (15, 24). The annual treatment-associated cost for CDI in the United States is estimated to be between $750 million and $3.2 billion (8, 9, 16, 31). Moreover, the number of fatal cases of CDI has been increasing rapidly (14, 39). Thus, there is an urgent need to find alternative therapies for CDI.C. difficile infection likely is initiated by infection with the spore form of C. difficile (12). C. difficile elicits disease through the actions of two secreted toxins, TcdA and TcdB (48). TcdB was recently shown to be critical for pathogenesis in an animal model of disease (18). Since the toxins are produced by vegetative cells, not by spores (17), germination and outgrowth are prerequisites for pathogenesis.Spore germination is triggered by the interaction of small molecules, called germinants, with receptors within the spore inner membrane. These germinants vary by bacterial species and can include ions, amino acids, sugars, nucleotides, surfactants, or combinations thereof (43). The recognition of germinants triggers irreversible germination, leading to Ca²⁺-dipicolinic acid release, the uptake of water, the degradation of the cortex, and, eventually, the outgrowth of the vegetative bacterium (43). The germination receptors that C. difficile uses to sense the environment have not been identified. Based on homology searches, C. difficile germination receptors must be very different from known germination receptors (42), but they appear to be proteinaceous (13).Taurocholate, a primary bile acid, has been used for approximately 30 years by researchers and clinical microbiologists to increase colony formation by C. difficile spores from patient and environmental samples (3, 49, 51, 52). This suggested that C. difficile spores interact with bile acids along the gastrointestinal (GI) tract and that spores use a host-derived signal to initiate germination.The liver synthesizes the two major primary bile acids, cholate and chenodeoxycholate (40). These compounds are modified by conjugation with either taurine (to give taurocholate or taurochenodeoxycholate) or glycine (producing glycocholate or glycochenodeoxycholate). Upon secretion into the digestive tract, bile aids in the absorption of fat and cholesterol; much of the secreted bile is actively absorbed and recycled back to the liver for reutilization (40). Though efficient, enterohepatic recirculation is not complete; bile enters the cecum of the large intestine at a concentration of approximately 2 mM (30).In the cecum, bile is modified by the normal, benign colonic flora. First, bile salt hydrolases found on the surfaces of many bacterial species remove the conjugated amino acid, producing the deconjugated primary bile acids cholate and chenodeoxycholate (40). These deconjugated primary bile acids are further metabolized by only a few species of intestinal bacteria, including Clostridium scindens. C. scindens actively transports unconjugated primary bile acids into the cytoplasm, where they are 7α-dehydroxylated, converting cholate to deoxycholate and chenodeoxycholate to lithocholate (21, 40). The disruption of the colonic flora by antibiotic treatment abolishes 7α-dehydroxylation activity (41).Building upon the work on Wilson and others (51, 52), we demonstrated that taurocholate and glycine, acting together, trigger the loss of the birefringence of C. difficile spores (45). All cholate derivatives (taurocholate, glycocholate, cholate, and deoxycholate) stimulate the germination of C. difficile spores (45). Recently it was shown that taurocholate binding is prerequisite to glycine binding (37). At physiologically relevant concentrations, chenodeoxycholate inhibits taurocholate-mediated germination (46) and also inhibits C. difficile vegetative growth, as does deoxycholate (45). In fact, C. difficile spores use the relative concentrations of the various bile acids as cues for germination within the host (10).Since chenodeoxycholate is absorbed by the colonic epithelium and metabolized to lithocholate by the colonic flora (25, 40), the use of chenodeoxycholate as a therapy against C. difficile disease might be hindered by its absorption and conversion to lithocholate.Here, we further characterize the interaction of C. difficile spores with various bile acids and demonstrate that chenodeoxycholate is a competitive inhibitor of taurocholate-mediated germination. Further, we identify chemical analogs of chenodeoxycholate that are more potent inhibitors of germination and that resist 7α-dehydroxylation by the colonic flora, potentially increasing their stability and effectiveness as inhibitors of C. difficile spore germination in the colonic environment.     

Poxvirus Complement Control Proteins Are Expressed on the Cell Surface through an Intermolecular Disulfide Bridge with the Viral A56 Protein

The vaccinia virus (VACV) complement control protein (VCP) is an immunomodulatory protein that is both secreted from and expressed on the surface of infected cells. Surface expression of VCP occurs though an interaction with the viral transmembrane protein A56 and is dependent on a free N-terminal cysteine of VCP. Although A56 and VCP have been shown to interact in infected cells, the mechanism remains unclear. To investigate if A56 is sufficient for surface expression, we transiently expressed VCP and A56 in eukaryotic cell lines and found that they interact on the cell surface in the absence of other viral proteins. Since A56 contains three extracellular cysteines, we hypothesized that one of the cysteines may be unpaired and could therefore form a disulfide bridge with VCP. To test this, we generated a series of A56 mutants in which each cysteine was mutated to a serine, and we found that mutation of cysteine 162 abrogated VCP cell surface expression. We also tested the ability of other poxvirus complement control proteins to bind to VACV A56. While the smallpox homolog of VCP is able to bind VACV A56, the ectromelia virus (ECTV) VCP homolog is only able to bind the ECTV homolog of A56, indicating that these proteins may have coevolved. Surface expression of poxvirus complement control proteins may have important implications in viral pathogenesis, as a virus that does not express cell surface VCP is attenuated in vivo. This suggests that surface expression of VCP may contribute to poxvirus pathogenesis.Poxviruses, including vaccinia virus (VACV), encode large numbers of immunomodulatory proteins that help them establish an infection and combat the host''s immune response (10, 32). One of these is the vaccinia virus complement control protein (VCP), which is both secreted from and expressed on the surface of infected cells (9, 14, 16, 17). VCP acts against the complement system, a series of soluble proteins that is an important early component of the innate immune system and also shapes adaptive immune responses (15, 42, 43). In response to viral infection, complement can opsonize or inactivate virions and can lyse enveloped virus or infected cells (1, 3, 7, 12). Because of these pressures, a number of viruses, including herpes simplex virus, flaviviruses, and poxviruses, encode novel or host-derived regulators of complement, while others, including HIV and poxviruses, incorporate host complement regulatory proteins into virus particles (7, 11, 31, 39). Many orthopoxviruses encode a complement regulator (8, 20, 23, 29), and the most studied of these is VCP. Structurally, VCP is made up of four short consensus repeats (SCR) that are the basic units of mammalian complement regulators (17, 25), and VCP has been shown to interfere with the complement cascade at multiple steps (2, 16, 20-22, 25, 28-30, 33). Additionally, a VCP knockout virus generates smaller lesions in animal models (14, 16). While some host complement control proteins (CCPs) are secreted, many contain transmembrane domains (or a glycophosphatidylinositol anchor) and are thus expressed on the cell surface (42, 43). Thus, when we found that VCP is also expressed on the infected cell surface and protects infected cells from complement-mediated lysis in vitro (9), we believed this to be an important interaction that required further investigation. We previously found that the N-terminal cysteine on VCP was needed for surface expression and that the VACV transmembrane protein A56 was also required (9). The vaccinia virus A56 protein is a type 1 transmembrane glycoprotein that is found on the surface of infected cells and on extracellular virus particles (4, 18, 26, 27, 36). It interacts with another viral protein, K2 (19, 37, 45), which lacks a transmembrane domain and binds to A56 noncovalently (36). The A56/K2 complex prevents syncytium formation between infected cells and superinfection by interacting with the vaccinia virus entry/fusion complex on virions (24, 38, 40, 41). Here we provide evidence that the N-terminal cysteine on VCP forms an intermolecular disulfide bond with cysteine 162 on the ectodomain of A56. We also demonstrate that similar interactions can occur with other poxvirus CCPs, as the smallpox virus and ectromelia virus homologs of VCP also exhibit A56-dependent surface expression.