Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1 Glycoprotein E Mediates Retrograde Spread from Epithelial Cells to Neurites

In animal models of infection, glycoprotein E (gE) is required for efficient herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) spread from the inoculation site to the cell bodies of innervating neurons (retrograde direction). Retrograde spread in vivo is a multistep process, in that HSV-1 first spreads between epithelial cells at the inoculation site, then infects neurites, and finally travels by retrograde axonal transport to the neuron cell body. To better understand the role of gE in retrograde spread, we used a compartmentalized neuron culture system, in which neurons were infected in the presence or absence of epithelial cells. We found that gE-deleted HSV-1 (NS-gEnull) retained retrograde axonal transport activity when added directly to neurites, in contrast to the retrograde spread defect of this virus in animals. To better mimic the in vivo milieu, we overlaid neurites with epithelial cells prior to infection. In this modified system, virus infects epithelial cells and then spreads to neurites, revealing a 100-fold retrograde spread defect for NS-gEnull. We measured the retrograde spread defect of NS-gEnull from a variety of epithelial cell lines and found that the magnitude of the spread defect from epithelial cells to neurons correlated with epithelial cell plaque size defect, indicating that gE plays a similar role in both types of spread. Therefore, gE-mediated spread between epithelial cells and neurites likely explains the retrograde spread defect of gE-deleted HSV-1 in vivo.Herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) is an alphaherpesvirus that characteristically infects skin and mucosal surfaces before spreading to sensory neurons, where it establishes a lifelong persistent infection. The virus periodically returns to the periphery via sensory axons and causes recurrent lesions as well as asymptomatic shedding. This life cycle requires viral transport along axons in two directions: toward the neuron cell body (retrograde direction) and away from the neuron cell body (anterograde direction).Many studies of alphaherpesvirus neuronal spread have focused on pseudorabies virus (PRV), a virus whose natural host is the pig. Three PRV proteins, glycoprotein E (gE), gI, and Us9, have been shown to mediate anterograde neuronal spread both in animal models of infection and in cultured neurons. However, these three proteins are dispensable for retrograde spread (3, 8, 11, 12, 31, 46). In contrast, numerous animal models of infection have shown that HSV-1 gE is required for retrograde spread from the inoculation site to the cell bodies of innervating neurons (4, 9, 44, 56). In the murine flank model, wild-type (WT) virus replicates in the skin and then infects sensory neurons and spreads in a retrograde direction to the dorsal root ganglia (DRG). In this model, gE-deleted HSV-1 replicates in the skin but is not detected in the DRG (9, 44). This phenotype differs from gE-deleted PRV, which is able to reach the DRG at WT levels (8). Thus, unlike PRV, gE-deleted HSV-1 viruses have a retrograde spread defect in vivo.HSV-1 gE is a 552-amino-acid type I membrane protein found in the virion membrane as well as in the trans-Golgi and plasma membranes of infected cells (1). gE forms a heterodimer with another viral glycoprotein, gI. The gE/gI complex is important for HSV-1 immune evasion through its Fc receptor activity. gE/gI binds to the Fc domain of antibodies directed against other viral proteins, sequestering these antibodies and blocking antibody effector functions (27, 32, 40). Additionally, gE/gI promotes spread between epithelial cells. Viruses lacking either gE or gI form characteristically small plaques in cell culture and small inoculation site lesions in mice (4, 9, 18, 40, 58). In animal models, gE and gI also mediate viral spread in both anterograde and retrograde directions (4, 19, 44, 56).In order to better understand the role of gE in HSV-1 retrograde neuronal spread, we employed a compartmentalized neuron culture system that has been used to study directional neuronal spread of PRV and West Nile virus (12, 14, 45). In the Campenot chamber system, neurites are contained in a compartment that is separate from their corresponding cell bodies. Therefore, spread in an exclusively retrograde direction can be measured by infecting neurites and detecting spread to neuron cell bodies.HSV-1 replication requires retrograde transport of incoming viral genomes to the nucleus. In neurites, fusion between viral and cellular membranes occurs at the plasma membrane (43, 48). Upon membrane fusion, the capsid and a subset of tegument proteins (the inner tegument) dissociate from glycoproteins and outer tegument proteins, which remain at the plasma membrane (28, 38). Unenveloped capsids and the associated inner tegument proteins are then transported in the retrograde direction to the nucleus (7, 48, 49).For both neurons and epithelial cells, retrograde transport is dependent upon microtubules, ATP, the retrograde microtubule motor dynein, and the dynein cofactor dynactin (22, 34, 49, 52). Several viral proteins interact with components of the dynein motor complex (23, 39, 60). However, none of these proteins suggest a completely satisfactory mechanism by which viral retrograde transport occurs, either because they are not components of the complex that is transported to the nucleus (UL34, UL9, VP11/12) or because capsids lacking that protein retain retrograde transport activity (VP26) (2, 17, 21, 28, 37). This implies that additional viral proteins are involved in retrograde trafficking.We sought to better characterize the role of gE in retrograde spread and found that gE is dispensable for retrograde axonal transport; however, it promotes HSV-1 spread from epithelial cells to neurites. This epithelial cell-to-neuron spread defect provides a plausible explanation for the retrograde spread defect of gE-deleted HSV-1 in animal models of infection.     

Differences in the Regulatory and Functional Effects of the Us3 Protein Kinase Activities of Herpes Simplex Virus 1 and 2

Us3 protein kinases encoded by herpes simplex virus 1 (HSV-1) and 2 (HSV-2) are serine/threonine protein kinases and play critical roles in viral replication and pathogenicity in vivo. In the present study, we investigated differences in the biological properties of HSV-1 and HSV-2 Us3 protein kinases and demonstrated that HSV-2 Us3 did not have some of the HSV-1 Us3 kinase functions, including control of nuclear egress of nucleocapsids, localization of UL31 and UL34, and cell surface expression of viral envelope glycoprotein B. In agreement with the observations that HSV-2 Us3 was less important for these functions, the effect of HSV-2 Us3 kinase activity on virulence in mice following intracerebral inoculation was much lower than that of HSV-1 Us3. Furthermore, we showed that alanine substitution in HSV-2 Us3 at a site (aspartic acid at position 147) corresponding to one that can be autophosphorylated in HSV-1 Us3 abolished HSV-2 Us3 kinase activity. Thus, the regulatory and functional effects of Us3 kinase activity are different between HSV-1 and HSV-2.Us3 protein kinases encoded by herpes simplex virus 1 (HSV-1) and 2 (HSV-2) are serine/threonine protein kinases with amino acid sequences that are conserved in the subfamily Alphaherpesvirinae (6, 24, 36). Based on studies showing that recombinant Us3 mutants of HSV-1 and HSV-2 have significantly impaired viral replication and virulence in mice models, it has been concluded that both HSV-1 and HSV-2 Us3 protein kinases play important roles in viral replication and pathogenicity in vivo (25, 33, 41). In contrast, HSV-1 and HSV-2 Us3 protein kinases are not essential for growth in tissue culture cells (33, 36). Thus, recombinant Us3 mutants grow as well as wild-type viruses in Vero cells, and the mutants exhibit modestly impaired replication in HEp-2 cells (33, 36, 39, 40). The possible functions of Us3 have been extensively studied and gradually elucidated for HSV-1 Us3, but much less is known about HSV-2 Us3. These functions include (i) blocking apoptosis (1, 22, 30, 31, 35); (ii) promoting nuclear egress of progeny nucleocapsids through the nuclear membrane (39, 40, 45); (iii) redistributing and phosphorylating nuclear membrane-associated viral nuclear egress factors UL31 and UL34 (14, 37, 38) and cellular proteins, including lamin A/C and emerin (21, 27, 28); (iv) controlling infected cell morphology (13, 31, 32); and (v) downregulating cell surface expression of viral envelope glycoprotein B (gB) (12).To determine the molecular mechanisms for a viral protein kinase''s effects in infected cells, the kinase''s physiological substrates and its phosphorylation sites must be identified. This can involve studies showing that the altered phenotypes observed in cells infected with a mutant virus lacking the protein kinase activity is also detected in cells infected with a mutant virus in which the substrate''s phosphorylation sites have been modified by mutations. Although more than 15 potential HSV Us3 substrates have been reported, HSV-1 Us3 phosphorylation of only three substrates (Us3 itself, gB, and UL31) has been demonstrated to be linked directly with Us3 functions in infected cells (12, 13, 29, 41) as follows. (i) Us3 has been reported to autophosphorylate serine at position 147 (Ser-147), and this phosphorylation augments Us3''s kinase activity in infected cells (13, 41). Even though only a small fraction of Us3 is autophosphorylated at Ser-147 in infected cells, alanine replacement of Ser-147 in Us3 significantly reduced HSV-1 replication in the mouse cornea and pathogenic manifestations of herpes stroma keratitis and periocular skin disease in mice (41). These results indicated that Us3 kinase activity was, in part, regulated by autophosphorylation of Ser-147, and regulation of Us3 activity by autophosphorylation played a critical role in viral replication in vivo and HSV-1 pathogenesis. (ii) It has been reported that HSV-1 Us3 phosphorylates Thr-887 in the cytoplasmic tail of gB, and this phosphorylation downregulates the cell surface expression of gB (12). Us3 phosphorylation of gB at Thr-887 also has been proposed to be involved in the regulation of fusion of the nascent progeny virion envelope with the cell''s outer nuclear membrane, based on the observation that virions accumulated aberrantly in the perinuclear space in cells infected with mutant viruses carrying the amino acid substitution mutation T887A in gB and lacking the capacity to produce gH (45). The Us3 phosphorylation of gB at Thr-887 appeared to be critical for HSV-1 replication and pathogenesis in vivo, based on studies showing that the T887A substitution in the phosphorylation site in gB significantly reduced viral replication in the mouse cornea and pathogenic manifestations of herpes stroma keratitis and periocular skin disease in mice (Takahiko Imai, Ken Sagou, and Yasushi Kawaguchi, unpublished observations). (iii) It has been shown that Us3 phosphorylated some or all of the six serines in the UL31 N-terminal region, and this phosphorylation regulated the proper localization of UL31 and UL34 at the nuclear membrane and nuclear egress of nucleocapsids (29). Thus, the molecular basis of HSV-1 Us3 effects in infected cells have been gradually elucidated.However, the Us3 phosphorylation sites in Us3 itself and in gB are not conserved between HSV serotypes (12, 13). The amino acid residues in HSV-2 Us3 and gB corresponding to HSV-1 Us3 Ser-147 and gB Thr-887 are aspartic acid (Asp-147) and alanine (Ala-887), respectively. These results suggest that some HSV-1 Us3 functions, such as regulation of its own catalytic activity and control of gB expression on the cell surface, are not regulated by HSV-2 Us3 or are regulated in a manner(s) different from HSV-1 Us3. In agreement with this suggestion, there is a marked difference between HSV-1 and HSV-2 virulence in mice following intracerebral infection, with the HSV-1 Us3 null mutant being >10⁴-fold less virulent than the parent wild-type virus (25), while the HSV-2 Us3 null mutant was only ∼10-fold less virulent (33). Although these results were from different reports and the mouse strains used in the studies were different, they indicate that some HSV-1 Us3 functions are different from those of HSV-2 Us3.Therefore, we investigated differences in the biological properties of HSV-1 and HSV-2 Us3 protein kinases. It was of particular interest to examine whether Asp-147 in HSV-2 Us3 is required for its own kinase activity, since it is well established that acidic amino acids such as Asp or glutamic acid sometimes mimic the negative charges produced by phosphorylation (29, 46). In the present study, using a genetic manipulation system of HSV-2 with our newly constructed HSV-2 bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) clone, we have shown that HSV-2 Us3 exhibited marked differences from HSV-1 Us3 in its catalytic functions, including the regulation of UL31/UL34 localization, nuclear egress of nucleocapsids, cell surface expression of gB, and virulence in mice. We also found that Asp-147 in HSV-2 Us3 was critical for its kinase activity, raising a possibility that the activity of Us3 kinases was regulated differently in HSV-1 and HSV-2.     

Reevaluating the CD8 T-Cell Response to Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1: Involvement of CD8 T Cells Reactive to Subdominant Epitopes

In C57BL/6 (B6) mice, most herpes simplex virus (HSV)-specific CD8 T cells recognize a strongly immunodominant epitope on glycoprotein B (gB₄₉₈) and can inhibit HSV type 1 (HSV-1) reactivation from latency in trigeminal ganglia (TG). However, half of the CD8 T cells retained in latently infected TG of B6 mice are not gB₄₉₈ specific and have been largely ignored. The following observations from our current study indicate that these gB₄₉₈-nonspecific CD8 T cells are HSV specific and may contribute to the control of HSV-1 latency. First, following corneal infection, OVA₂₅₇-specific OT-1 CD8 T cells do not infiltrate the infected TG unless mice are simultaneously immunized with OVA₂₅₇ peptide, and then they are not retained. Second, 30% of CD8 T cells in acutely infected TG that produce gamma interferon in response to HSV-1 stimulation directly ex vivo are gB₄₉₈ nonspecific, and these cells maintain an activation phenotype during viral latency. Finally, gB₄₉₈-nonspecific CD8 T cells are expanded in ex vivo cultures of latently infected TG and inhibit HSV-1 reactivation from latency in the absence of gB₄₉₈-specific CD8 T cells. We conclude that many of the CD8 T cells that infiltrate and are retained in infected TG are HSV specific and potentially contribute to maintenance of HSV-1 latency. Identification of the viral proteins recognized by these cells will contribute to a better understanding of the dynamics of HSV-1 latency.The generation and maintenance of a CD8 T-cell response represent an important line of defense against many viral pathogens. Such responses are typically initiated when host antigen-presenting cells at the site of infection capture and process viral proteins and transport them to local draining lymph nodes (DLN). There the antigen-presenting cells either directly present viral antigens to naïve CD8 T cells or pass them to a distinct LN-resident dendritic cell (DC) subset for antigen presentation in the context of major histocompatibility complex class I (1). Antigen-specific CD8 T cells then undergo robust division and differentiation into effector populations armed to infiltrate infected tissue and eliminate the invading pathogen. The magnitude of the CD8 T-cell response against different viral epitopes is typically aligned within a defined hierarchy. Those epitopes recognized by the largest portion of the pathogen-specific CD8 T-cell population are referred to as immunodominant, while those inciting lesser responses are referred to as subdominant (17). Manipulation of this hierarchal system by the elimination of an immunodominant epitope often results in the expansion of a normally silent or “cryptic” determinant (2, 17, 21).Although the HSV-1 genome contains at least 84 open reading frames (13), it is estimated that 70 to 95% of the acute CD8 T-cell response in lymphoid organs of B6 mice is directed against the single immunodominant gB₄₉₈ epitope (11, 21, 24, 26, 27). The remaining HSV-specific CD8 T cells are thought to be directed against a subdominant epitope on the viral ribonucleotide reductase (RR1₈₂₂) (16). These conclusions are derived from studies characterizing the specificity of CD8 T cells at the peak of the effector response in lymphoid tissue. Interestingly, a recombinant HSV-1 lacking the immunodominant gB₄₉₈ epitope induced an HSV-specific CD8 T-cell response of normal magnitude, while the RR1₈₂₂ epitope remained subdominant (21), suggesting the emergence of previously unrecognized or cryptic epitopes.Following HSV-1 corneal infection of B6 mice, virus is transmitted to the trigeminal ganglia (TG), where it replicates briefly (up to 6 days postinfection [dpi]) and then establishes a latent infection. CD8 effector T cells accumulate to peak levels in the TG by 8 dpi and then undergo contraction, and then a memory population of constant size is maintained for the life of the animal. While 50% of both the effector and memory CD8 T-cell populations are specific for the immunodominant gB₄₉₈ epitope (11, 18), the remaining TG-resident CD8 T cells are specific for neither the dominant gB₄₉₈ nor the subdominant RR1₈₂₂ epitope. Although the phenotype and function of the gB₄₉₈-specific CD8 T cells in sensory ganglia and their role in maintaining HSV-1 latency have been well characterized (3, 5, 9, 11, 12, 14, 18, 19, 22, 24, 25, 27), the properties of the gB₄₉₈-nonspecific TG-resident CD8 T-cell population and their role in maintaining viral latency remain unexplored. Here we demonstrate that many of the gB₄₉₈-nonspecific CD8 T cells in latently infected TG proliferate and some produce gamma interferon (IFN-γ) when stimulated with HSV-1 antigens directly ex vivo. These cells also persistently exhibit an activation phenotype within latently infected TG, are expanded in ex vivo cultures of latently infected TG, and can block HSV-1 reactivation in TG neurons in the absence of gB₄₉₈-specific CD8 T cells.     

Retrograde Axon Transport of Herpes Simplex Virus and Pseudorabies Virus: a Live-Cell Comparative Analysis

Upon entry, neuroinvasive herpesviruses traffic from axon terminals to the nuclei of neurons resident in peripheral ganglia, where the viral DNA is deposited. A detailed analysis of herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) transport dynamics in axons following entry is currently lacking. Here, time lapse fluorescence microscopy was used to compare the postentry viral transport of two neurotropic herpesviruses: HSV-1 and pseudorabies virus (PRV). HSV-1 capsid transport dynamics were indistinguishable from those of PRV and did not differ in neurons of human, mouse, or avian origin. Simultaneous tracking of capsids and tegument proteins demonstrated that the composition of actively transporting HSV-1 is remarkably similar to that of PRV. This quantitative assessment of HSV-1 axon transport following entry demonstrates that HSV-1 and PRV share a conserved mechanism for postentry retrograde transport in axons and provides the foundation for further studies of the retrograde transport process.Herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) and the veterinary herpesvirus pathogen pseudorabies virus (PRV) establish latent infections within the peripheral nervous systems (PNS) of their hosts. Neurotropic herpesviruses gain access to the PNS at nerve endings present in infected skin or mucosal tissue. Upon entry at the nerve terminal, viral particles are transported in axons toward the neuronal cell body to ultimately deposit the viral genome into the nucleus. This process is referred to as retrograde transport and is critical for the establishment of latency. Following reactivation, progeny viral particles travel anterogradely from the ganglia toward the nerve terminals, resulting in reinfection of the dermis or other innervated tissues. Reactivated infection can manifest in various forms, including asymptomatic virus shedding or mild focal lesions (herpes labialis), or less frequently in more-severe disease (herpes keratitis, encephalitis, and in the case of varicella-zoster virus, shingles).All herpesviruses consist of an icosahedral capsid that contains the viral genome surrounded by a layer of proteins known as the tegument, which is contained within a membrane envelope (33). HSV-1 and PRV capsids disassociate from the viral envelope (2, 13, 14, 22, 23, 25, 28, 30, 40) and several tegument proteins (13, 16, 21, 25) upon fusion-mediated entry into cells. However, following entry into epithelial cell lines, the VP1/2 and UL37 tegument proteins are detected in association with cytosolic capsids of PRV by immunogold electron microscopy (16) and colocalize with HSV-1 capsids at the nuclear membrane by immunofluorescence microscopy (8). In primary sensory neurons, VP1/2 and UL37 are observed to be cotransported with PRV capsids during retrograde transport by time lapse fluorescence microscopy (21), and the kinetics of axon transport have been assessed (39).Although HSV-1 and PRV share similarities in their neurotropism in vivo (reviewed in reference 12), studies of axon transport have indicated possible mechanistic differences relevant to the underlying cell biology of neural transmission (reviewed in reference 10). As a result, a live-cell analysis comparing PRV and HSV-1 is needed to determine if axon transport mechanisms are conserved between the two neuroinvasive herpesvirus genera: Simplexvirus (HSV-1) and Varicellovirus (PRV). In this study, the retrograde transport process that delivers capsids to the nuclei of sensory neurons was compared for HSV-1 (strains KOS and F) and PRV (strain Becker).     

Intracellular Localization of the Pseudorabies Virus Large Tegument Protein pUL36

Homologs of the essential large tegument protein pUL36 of herpes simplex virus 1 are conserved throughout the Herpesviridae, complex with pUL37, and form part of the capsid-associated “inner” tegument. pUL36 is crucial for transport of the incoming capsid to and docking at the nuclear pore early after infection as well as for virion maturation in the cytoplasm. Its extreme C terminus is essential for pUL36 function interacting with pUL25 on nucleocapsids to start tegumentation (K. Coller, J. Lee, A. Ueda, and G. Smith, J. Virol. 81:11790-11797, 2007). However, controversy exists about the cellular compartment in which pUL36 is added to the nascent virus particle. We generated monospecific rabbit antisera against four different regions spanning most of pUL36 of the alphaherpesvirus pseudorabies virus (PrV). By immunofluorescence and immunoelectron microscopy, we then analyzed the intracellular location of pUL36 after transient expression and during PrV infection. While reactivities of all four sera were comparable, none of them showed specific intranuclear staining during PrV infection. In immunoelectron microscopy, neither of the sera stained primary enveloped virions in the perinuclear cleft, whereas extracellular mature virus particles were extensively labeled. However, transient expression of pUL36 alone resulted in partial localization to the nucleus, presumably mediated by nuclear localization signals (NLS) whose functionality was demonstrated by fusion of the putative NLS to green fluorescent protein (GFP) and GFP-tagged pUL25. Since PrV pUL36 can enter the nucleus when expressed in isolation, the NLS may be masked during infection. Thus, our studies show that during PrV infection pUL36 is not detectable in the nucleus or on primary enveloped virions, correlating with the notion that the tegument of mature virus particles, including pUL36, is acquired in the cytosol.The herpesvirus virion is composed of an icosahedral nucleocapsid containing the viral genome, an envelope of cellular origin with inserted viral (glyco)proteins, and a tegument which links nucleocapsid and envelope comparable to the matrix of RNA viruses. The herpesvirus tegument contains a multitude of viral and cellular proteins (reviewed in references 45 and 46). Tegument proteins execute various regulatory and structural functions, including activation of viral gene expression (2), modulation of the host cell for virus replication (26, 51, 55), and mediation of posttranslational modification of proteins (10, 27, 50). Numerous interactions have been identified among tegument proteins, between tegument and capsid proteins, and between tegument and envelope proteins (7, 14, 16, 18, 33, 36, 42, 53, 58-61).The largest tegument proteins found in the herpesviruses are homologs of pUL36 of herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1). Pseudorabies virus (PrV) pUL36 consists of 3,084 amino acids (aa) with a molecular mass of 324 kDa (33). PrV and HSV-1 pUL36 are essential for viral replication (13, 15). In their absence, nonenveloped nucleocapsids accumulate in the cytoplasm. Whereas in several studies nuclear stages like cleavage and packaging of the viral DNA as well as nuclear egress were not found affected (13, 15), another study indicated an effect of pUL36 deletion on PrV nuclear egress (41).pUL36 homologs complex with another tegument protein, pUL37, as has been shown for HSV-1 (59), PrV (15, 33), and human cytomegalovirus (3, 23), and the interacting region on pUL36 has been delineated for PrV (33) and identified at the amino acid level for HSV-1 (47). Deletion of the pUL37 interaction domain from PrV pUL36 impedes virion formation in the cytosol but does not block it completely, yielding a phenotype similar to that of a pUL37 deletion mutant (31). This indicates an important but nonessential role for pUL37 and the pUL37 interaction domain in pUL36 in virion formation (15). In contrast, absence of pUL37 completely blocks virion formation in HSV-1 (11, 38).pUL36 is stably attached to the nucleocapsid (39, 43, 56), remains associated with incoming particles during transport along microtubules to the nuclear pore (21, 40, 52), and is required for intracellular nucleocapsid transport during egress (41). In contrast, absence of pUL37 delays nuclear translocation of incoming PrV nucleocapsids but does not abolish it (35). HSV-1 pUL36 is involved not only in transport but also in docking of nucleocapsids to the nuclear pore (9), and proteolytic cleavage of pUL36 appears to be necessary for release of HSV-1 DNA into the nucleus (24).Immunoelectron microscopical studies of PrV-infected cells showed that pUL36 is added to nucleocapsids prior to the addition of pUL37 (33). Since neither pUL36 nor pUL37 was detected on primary enveloped PrV virions, it was concluded that acquisition of tegument takes place in the cytoplasm (20). However, conflicting data exist whether pUL36 is present in the nucleus, and whether it is already added onto the capsids in this cellular compartment. Indirect immunofluorescence, immunoelectron microscopy and mass spectrometry of intranuclear capsids yielded discrepant results. By immunofluorescence HSV-1 pUL36 was detected both in the cytoplasm and in the nucleus (1, 42, 48). However, whereas one study detected the protein on nuclear C-capsids by Western blotting (6), it was not found by cryo-electron microscopy and mass spectrometry (57). In contrast, the C terminus of PrV pUL36 was suggested to direct pUL36 to capsid assemblons in the nucleus (37) by binding to capsid-associated pUL25 (8), although pUL36 could not be detected in the nucleus during PrV infection (33). These differing results in HSV-1 and between HSV-1 and PrV might be due to the fact that pUL36 could be processed during the replication cycle and that the resulting subdomains may exhibit selective localization patterns (24, 28).Amino acid sequence analyses of HSV-1 and PrV pUL36 revealed several putative nuclear localization signals (NLS) (1, 4, 5, 49). HSV-1 pUL36 contains four of these NLS motifs (49). Functionality in nuclear localization of a reporter protein was shown for the NLS motif at aa 425 (1). This motif is highly conserved in herpesvirus pUL36 homologs pointing to an important function (1). Besides this conserved NLS (designated in this report as NLS1), two other NLS motifs are predicted in PrV pUL36. One is located adjacent to NLS1 (aa 288 to 296) at aa 315 to 321 (NLS2), and a third putative NLS motif is present in the C-terminal half of the protein (aa 1679 to 1682; NLS3) (4). Whereas this may be indicative for a role for pUL36 inside the nucleus, NLS motifs might also be involved in transport to the nucleus along microtubules (54) and docking at the nuclear pore complex (49).The discrepancy in pUL36 localization and the putative presence of pUL36 cleavage products with specialized functions and localization prompted us to generate monospecific antisera covering the major part of PrV pUL36 and to study localization of PrV pUL36 by immunofluorescence during viral replication and after transient transfection and by immunoelectron microscopy of infected cells.     

Mucosal Innate and Adaptive Immune Responses against Herpes Simplex Virus Type 2 in a Humanized Mouse Model

Genital herpes, caused by herpes simplex virus type 2 (HSV-2), is one of the most prevalent sexually transmitted diseases worldwide and a risk factor for acquiring human immunodeficiency virus. Although many vaccine candidates have shown promising results in animal models, they have failed to be effective in human trials. In this study, a humanized mouse strain was evaluated as a potential preclinical model for studying human immune responses to HSV-2 infection and vaccination. Immunodeficient mouse strains were examined for their abilities to develop human innate and adaptive immune cells after transplantation of human umbilical cord stem cells. A RAG2^−/− γc^−/− mouse strain with a BALB/c background was chosen as the most appropriate model and was then examined for its ability to mount innate and adaptive immune responses to intravaginal HSV-2 infection and immunization. After primary infection, human cells in the lymph nodes were able to generate a protective innate immune response and produce gamma interferon (IFN-γ). After intravaginal immunization and infection, human T cells and NK cells were found in the genital tract and iliac lymph nodes. In addition, human T cells in the spleen, lymph nodes, and vaginal tract were able to respond to stimulation with HSV-2 antigens by replicating and producing IFN-γ. Human B cells were also able to produce HSV-2-specific immunoglobulin G. These adaptive responses were also shown to be protective and reduce local viral replication in the genital tract. This approach provides a means for studying human immune responses in vivo using a small-animal model and may become an important preclinical tool.Genital herpes, caused primarily by herpes simplex virus type 2 (HSV-2), is one of the most prevalent sexually transmitted diseases in the world and is associated with substantial morbidity (13). After initial infection of the genital tract, the virus establishes latency within the nervous system and thus maintains lifelong infection in humans. Latent virus can reactivate and cause recurrent symptoms, including genital lesions; however, subclinical infection and asymptomatic viral shedding also occur (11, 35, 40, 53). HSV-2 has gained increasing interest in the light of evidence that it is a major risk factor for human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) acquisition and transmission and for the progression of HIV-1 infection (8, 9, 17, 25, 37, 55, 56). In addition, there is evidence that anti-HSV therapy can reduce the amount of infectious HIV-1 in the genital tracts of women (9, 45). Although antiviral treatment is available and can reduce the severity of the infection, compliance problems, as well as difficulty in diagnosing infection in patients, have hampered efforts to control the disease. A vaccine would provide a more effective way of preventing or limiting infection and would therefore greatly reduce the social and economic burdens caused by HSV-2 infection.Several vaccine candidates exist; however, they have proven to be less successful in clinical trials than anticipated, and new strategies may need to be developed (24, 61). A key concern is that preclinical vaccine strategies have been evaluated largely by using studies performed with mouse models of HSV-2 infection and, thus, the immune responses observed were mediated by murine cells. As a consequence, the results of these studies may not accurately represent the human immune response to infection. In order to develop an effective vaccine and/or treatment, it is necessary to understand which immune mechanisms provide protection against infection at the site of viral entry, the vaginal tract, and how these immune responses can be induced in humans.Innate and adaptive immune responses are both important for controlling HSV-2 infection. Innate immune cells such as NK and NKT cells are required for protection against genital HSV-2 infection in mice (1) and in humans; NK cells accumulate at sites of HSV-2 infection and can lyse HSV-infected cells (30, 67). Adaptive immune responses to HSV-2 include the cellular response mediated by CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T cells and the humoral response mediated by B cells and antibodies. There is much evidence that T cells play a crucial role in protection against HSV-2 in mice and humans (28). T cells are present in herpes lesions, and depletion of T cells in mice greatly reduces protection (16, 27, 29, 30, 44, 51, 70). Gamma interferon (IFN-γ), which is produced early after infection by NK cells and later by CD4⁺ T cells, has been shown to be a crucial cytokine for the control of HSV (43, 52, 58, 63). Although HSV-2-specific antibodies are produced in response to infection and vaccination, a correlation with protection in humans has not been established (2, 3, 7, 10, 11, 48). In mice, a role for antibodies early after infection has been shown; however, if B cells are knocked out, mice are still able to eventually clear the virus (16, 50). Although we do not have a complete understanding of the components that are necessary for protection, it appears that both innate and adaptive immune responses will be required and that it will be important to elicit these responses at the site of infection in the genital tract.The lack of an effective vaccine and accurate translation of results obtained with mice to humans indicates a need for a more relevant preclinical model to study human immune responses and disease. Substantial improvements in the development of humanized mice have made them a novel tool for the study of human diseases (69). Human CD34⁺ stem cells have been injected into several immunodeficient mouse strains, such as NOD/SCID/γc^−/− and RAG2^−/− γc^−/− mice, in which superior engraftment has resulted in multilineage differentiation of the human cells (23, 64). These novel humanized mice have been shown to develop human immune responses to pathogens such as Epstein-Barr virus, dengue virus, and influenza virus and to immunization with cholera toxin (33, 64, 66, 68). In addition, humanized mice can support infection with HIV after systemic or mucosal challenge in the vaginal tract and rectum (4-6, 62, 65). HSV-2 infection in humanized mice has not been examined, and mucosal immunization that can provide protection from infection with wild-type virus has also not been demonstrated. In addition, although it is clear that adaptive immune responses can be generated in humanized mice, innate responses to viral infection have not been extensively examined.In this study, we evaluated three immunodeficient mouse strains for their abilities to engraft human umbilical cord-derived stem cells and support the differentiation of these cells into important innate and adaptive immune cells. The most appropriate model was then used to examine mucosal immune responses following primary HSV-2 infection, immunization, and secondary HSV-2 challenge. We show for the first time that the humanized mice can mount protective human NK cell-mediated innate immune responses to primary mucosal infection with HSV-2. In addition, mucosal immunization and infection can induce HSV-2-specific antibody production and, to a greater extent, T-cell-mediated responses both systemically and locally in the genital tracts of humanized mice. We further show that mucosal immunization can provide protection against a lethal intravaginal (IVAG) challenge with HSV-2.