Isolation of dominant suppressor mutations for position-effect variegation in Drosophila melanogaster

Summary Dominant suppressor mutations for position-effect variegation have been isolated by using a strongly variegated line carrying the w ^m4 chromosome (w ^m4h) and the dominant enhancer mutant En(var)c ¹⁰¹. The use of an effective genetic test system made it possible to isolate more than 100 strongly dominant suppressor mutations for position-effect variegation. This suggests that the phenomenon of position-effect variegation is characterised by a complex genetic basis. The significance of the isolated mutants to genetic dissection of structural and regulatory functions of the eukaryotic chromosome is discussed.     

Third chromosome suppressor of position-effect variegation loci in Drosophila melanogaster

Summary As a result of a genetic analysis of 63 third chromosome suppressor mutations of position-effect variegation 12 different loci showing dominant suppression have been identified and their map positions determined. A compilcation of the genetic data available for each suppressor locus is given. The strong suppressor effects of the mutations have been quantified by measurements of white variegation inw ^m4h /w ^m4h ,w ^m4h /Y andw ^m4h /O flies. Mutant alleles of three loci were found in these studies to dominate over the strong enhancer effect of complete loss of the Y chromosome. Most of the identified loci suppressing position-effect variegation represent essential genetic funtions; only three loci represent nonessential functions. Mutations of two loci display recessive butyrate sensitivity and lethal interaction with the heterochromatic Y chromosome suggesting that these genes affect chromosomal condensation. Studies with deficiencies and triploids revealed that most of the loci represent haplo-abnormal suppressor functions. The use of the isolated mutant material for genetic, developmental and molecular studies of processes connected with gene inactivation in position-effect variegation is discussed.Dedicated to Prof. H.J. Becker on the occasion of his 6th birthday     

Carnitine suppression of position-effect variegation in Drosophila melanogaster

Carnitine is a well-known naturally occurring compound, very similar to butyrate, with an essential role in intermediary metabolism mainly at the mitochondrial level. Since butyrate inhibits the enzyme histone deacetylase and is capable of suppressing position-effect variegation in Drosophila melanogaster, we tested a further possible function of carnitine in the nucleus, using an assay for the suppression of position-effect variegation. We tested three physiological forms of carnitine (l-carnitine, l-propionylcarnitine, l-acetylcarnitine) for the ability to suppress two different chromosomal rearrangements, inducing variegation of the white ⁺ and brown ⁺ genes. The results show that the carnitine derivatives are capable of suppressing the position-effect variegation, albeit with different efficiencies. The carnitine derivatives interact lethally with Su-var(2)1 ⁰¹, a mutation that induces hyperacetylation of histones, whilst hyperacetylated histories accumulated in both the nuclei of HeLa cells and Drosophila polytene chromosomes treated with the same compounds. These results strongly suggest that the carnitine derivatives suppress position-effect variegation by a mechanism similar to that of butyrate. It is suggested that carnitines may have a functional role in the nucleus, probably at the chromatin level.     

Butyrate suppression of position-effect variegation in Drosophila melanogaster

Summary The strain of Drosophila melanogaster carrying the inversion In(1)w ^m4, which juxtaposes the normal w ⁺ gene to the centromeric heterochromatin, variegates for pigmentation in the eye. This strain was treated with various concentrations of n-butyrate and n-proprionate during the embryonic and larval stages. Concentrations as low as 70mM markedly suppress the variegated eye phenotype. This suggests that non-acetylated histones play a major role in the phenomenon of position-effect variegation.This research was supported by Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council Canada team grant A-1764 to T.A.G. and D.T. Suzuki, and Natural, Applied & Health Sciences grant 9704 to T.A.G.     

Characterization of mutations that enhance position-effect variegation in Drosophila melanogaster

Summary Several mutants that enhance the gene inactivation associated with position-effect variegation [E(var) mutants] have been characterized. These include three ethyl methanesulfonate (EMS)-induced lesions and a second chromosome duplication. Each of the EMS mutations maps to a discrete euchromatic site on the third chromosome. One is located within the chromosomal region occupied by a cluster of Su(var) mutations. All four E(var) mutants enhance the inactivation of several different variegators and therefore they appear to influence position-effect variegation generally. However, the enhancement caused by the single site E(var) mutations is less striking than that caused by the duplication or by loss of the Y chromosome. The interaction between the E(var) mutants and selected Su(var) mutations, as well as the effects of extra Y heterochromatin on E(var) expression, have also been investigated. Based on the results of these studies, various hypothetical functions of the E(var) ⁺ products are suggested.     

An investigation into the metamorphosis of the mutant lethal-translucida of drosophila melanogaster

Summary Development of lethal translucida pupae is under normal conditions predominantly blocked in the early pupal stages. Imaginal differentiation, though almost exclusively restricted to the head and thorax, is exhibited in only 20–30% of the individuals.When ltr pupae are subjected to pure oxygen both the frequency and the intensity of imaginal differentiation is strongly increased. Then 60–70% of the pupae shows metamorphosis of the head and thorax, whereas abdominal differentiations could be observed in about 20%.The minimal time during which the pupae must be kept in oxygen, to give a maximum percentage of metamorphosing individuals in air, is 100–120 hours for differentiations of the head and thorax and about 140 hours for those of the abdomen.These experimental results suggest that part of the incomplete metamorphosis in homozygous ltr pupae is due to an insufficient supply of oxygen.The differentiation of normal eye implants within non-metamorphosed ltr pupae showed that the reaction capacity of the imaginal tissues in the ltr/ltr genotype is also significantly weakened.In the discussion of the results, our data have been related to those of Chen on lowered oxygen consumption in ltr pupae. It seems probable that in those ltr pupae showing metamorphosis of the head and thorax, a better oxygen supply existed already from the time of puparium formation.With 6 text-figures.This work was started in 1949 in the Institute of Zoology and Comparative Anatomy of the University of Zurich.     

Enhancer of Polycomb is a suppressor of position-effect variegation in Drosophila melanogaster.

Polycomb group (PcG) genes of Drosophila are negative regulators of homeotic gene expression required for maintenance of determination. Sequence similarity between Polycomb and Su(var)205 led to the suggestion that PcG genes and modifiers of position-effect variegation (PEV) might function analogously in the establishment of chromatin structure. If PcG proteins participate directly in the same process that leads to PEV, PcG mutations should suppress PEV. We show that mutations in E(Pc), an unusual member of the PcG, suppress PEV of four variegating rearrangements: In(l)wm4, B(SV), T(2;3)Sb(V) and In(2R)bw(VDe2). Using reversion of a Pelement insertion, deficiency mapping, and recombination mapping as criteria, homeotic effects and suppression of PEV associated with E(Pc) co-map. Asx is an enhancer of PEV, whereas nine other PcG loci do not affect PEV. These results support the conclusion that there are fewer similarities between PcG genes and modifiers of PEV than previously supposed. However, E(Pc) appears to be an important link between the two groups. We discuss why Asx might act as an enhancer of PEV.     

Dosage-dependent modification of position-effect variegation in Drosophla

Many loci in Drosophila exhibit dosage effects on single phenotypes. In the case of modifiers of position-effect variegation, increases and decreases in dosage can have opposite effects on variegating phenotypes. This is seemingly paradoxical: if each locus encodes a limiting gene product sensitive to dosage decreases, then increasing the dosage of any one should have no effect, because the others should remain limiting. An earlier model put forward to resolve this paradox suggested that dosage-dependent modifiers encode protein subunits of a macromolecular complex that is sensitive to mass action equilibrium conditions. Because chemical equilibria are dynamic, however, such hypothetical complexes will be unstable to an extent that is inconsistent with the known properties of molecules that make up chromatin. An alternative model accounts for the dosage effects in terms of interactions between structural proteins that bind at multiple linked sites. These might include indirect interactions occurring between regulatory proteins and genes for structural proteins or their protein products. The large number of direct and inverse regulatory genes which are known to exist in Drosophila could account for the apparent genetic complexity that is seen for modifiers of position-effect variegation and for other systems of phenotypic modification.     

Comparative analysis of position-effect variegation mutations in Drosophila melanogaster delineates the targets of modifiers.

In Drosophila melanogaster, heterochromatin-induced silencing or position-effect variegation (PEV) of a reporter gene has provided insights into the properties of heterochromatin. Class I modifiers suppress PEV, and class II modifiers enhance PEV when the modifier gene is present in fewer than two doses. We have examined the effects of both class I and class II modifiers on four PEV mutations. These mutations include the inversions In(1)w(m4) and In(2R)bw(VDe2), which are classical chromosomal rearrangements that typify PEV mutations. The other mutations are a derivative of brown(Dominant), in which brown+ reporters are inactivated by a large block of heterochromatin, and a P[white+] transposon insertion associated with second chromosome heterochromatin. In general, we find that class I modifiers affect both classical and nonclassical PEV mutations, whereas class II modifiers affect only classical PEV mutations. We suggest that class II modifiers affect chromatin architecture in the vicinity of reporter genes, and only class I modifiers identify proteins that are potentially involved in heterochromatin formation or maintenance. In addition, our observations support a model in which there are different constraints on the process of heterochromatin-induced silencing in classical vs. nonclassical PEV mutations.     

Carnitine suppression of position-effect variegation in Drosophila melanogaster

Carnitine is a well-known naturally occurring compound, very similar to butyrate, with an essential role in intermediary metabolism mainly at the mitochondrial level. Since butyrate inhibits the enzyme histone deacetylase and is capable of suppressing position-effect variegation in Drosophila melanogaster, we tested a further possible function of carnitine in the nucleus, using an assay for the suppression of position-effect variegation. We tested three physiological forms of carnitine (l-carnitine, l-propionylcarnitine, l-acetylcarnitine) for the ability to suppress two different chromosomal rearrangements, inducing variegation of the white ⁺ and brown ⁺ genes. The results show that the carnitine derivatives are capable of suppressing the position-effect variegation, albeit with different efficiencies. The carnitine derivatives interact lethally with Su-var(2)1 ⁰¹, a mutation that induces hyperacetylation of histones, whilst hyperacetylated histories accumulated in both the nuclei of HeLa cells and Drosophila polytene chromosomes treated with the same compounds. These results strongly suggest that the carnitine derivatives suppress position-effect variegation by a mechanism similar to that of butyrate. It is suggested that carnitines may have a functional role in the nucleus, probably at the chromatin level.     

Heterochromatin protein 1, a known suppressor of position-effect variegation, is highly conserved in Drosophila.

The Su(var)205 gene of Drosophila melanogaster encodes heterochromatin protein 1 (HP1), a protein located preferentially within beta-heterochromatin. Mutation of this gene has been associated with dominant suppression of position-effect variegation. We have cloned and sequenced the gene encoding HP1 from Drosophila virilis, a distantly related species. Comparison of the predicted amino acid sequence with Drosophila melanogaster HP1 shows two regions of strong homology, one near the N-terminus (57/61 amino acids identical) and the other near the C-terminus (62/68 amino acids identical) of the protein. Little homology is seen in the 5' and 3' untranslated portions of the gene, as well as in the intronic sequences, although intron/exon boundaries are generally conserved. A comparison of the deduced amino acid sequences of HP1-like proteins from other species shows that the cores of the N-terminal and C-terminal domains have been conserved from insects to mammals. The high degree of conservation suggests that these N- and C-terminal domains could interact with other macromolecules in the formation of the condensed structure of heterochromatin.     

Genomic imprinting and position-effect variegation in Drosophila melanogaster

Genomic imprinting is a phenomenon in which the expression of a gene or chromosomal region depends on the sex of the individual transmitting it. The term imprinting was first coined to describe parent-specific chromosome behavior in the dipteran insect Sciara and has since been described in many organisms, including other insects, plants, fish, and mammals. In this article we describe a mini-X chromosome in Drosophila melanogaster that shows genomic imprinting of at least three closely linked genes. The imprinting of these genes is observed as mosaic silencing when the genes are transmitted by the male parent, in contrast to essentially wild-type expression when the same genes are maternally transmitted. We show that the imprint is due to the sex of the parent rather than to a conventional maternal effect, differential mitotic instability of the mini-X chromosome, or an allele-specific effect. Finally, we have examined the effects of classical modifiers of position-effect variegation on the maintenance and the establishment of the imprint. Factors that modify position-effect variegation alter the somatic expression but not the establishment of the imprint. This suggests that chromatin structure is important in maintenance of the imprint, but a separate mechanism may be responsible for its initiation.     

Recombinogenic effects of suppressors of position-effect variegation in Drosophila

Compact chromatin structure, induction of gene silencing in position-effect variegation (PEV), and crossing-over suppression are typical features of heterochromatin. To identify genes affecting crossing-over suppression by heterochromatin we tested PEV suppressor mutations for their effects on crossing over in pericentromeric regions of Drosophila autosomes. From the 46 mutations (28 loci) studied, 16 Su(var) mutations of the nine genes Su(var)2-1, Su(var)2-2, Su(var)2-5, Su(var)2-10, Su(var)2-14, Su(var)2-15, Su(var)3-3, Su(var)3-7, and Su(var)3-9 significantly increase in heterozygotes or by additive effects in double and triple heterozygotes crossing over in the ri-p(p) region of chromosome 3. Su(var)2-2(01) and Su(var)2-14(01) display the strongest recombinogenic effects and were also shown to enhance recombination within the light-rolled heterochromatic region of chromosome 2. The dominant recombinogenic effects of Su(var) mutations are most pronounced in proximal euchromatin and are accompanied with significant reduction of meiotic nondisjunction. Our data suggest that crossing-over suppression by heterochromatin is controlled at chromatin structure as well as illustrate the possible effects of heterochromatin on total crossing-over frequencies in the genome.