Histone H4 acetylation and DNA methylation dynamics during pollen development

Summary The first pollen mitosis results in generative and vegetative cells which are characterised by a striking difference in their chromatin structure. In this study, histone H4 acetylation and DNA methylation have been analysed during pollen development inLilium longiflorum. Indirect immunofluorescence procedures followed by epifluorescence and laser scanning microscopy enabled a relative quantification of H4 acetylation and DNA methylation in microspores, immature binucleate pollen, mature pollen, and pollen tubes. The results show that histone H4 of the vegetative nucleus, in spite of its decondensed chromatin structure, is strongly hypoacetylated at lysine positions 5 and 8 in comparison with both the original microspore nucleus and the generative-cell nucleus. These H4 terminal lysines in the vegetative nucleus are, however, progressively acetylated during the following pollen tube growth. The DNA methylation analysis inversely correlates with the histone acetylation data. The vegetative nucleus in mature pollen grains is heavily methylated, but a dramatic nonreplicative demethylation occurs during the pollen tube development. Changes neither in H4 acetylation nor in DNA methylation have been found during development of the generative nucleus. The results obtained indicate that the vegetative nucleus enters the quiescent state (accompanied by DNA hypermethylation and H4 underacetylation) during the maturation of pollen grain which enables pollen grains a long-term survival without external source of nutrients until they reach the stigma.     

Involvement of histone hypoacetylation in Ni<Superscript>2+</Superscript>-induced<Emphasis Type="Italic"> bcl</Emphasis>-<Emphasis Type="Italic">2</Emphasis> down-regulation and human hepatoma cell apoptosis

Although induction of cell apoptosis is known to be involved in the cytotoxicity of Ni(2+), little research has been aimed at the mechanism of Ni(2+)-induced apoptosis. Recent studies showed that Ni(2+) induces histone hypoacetylation in different cell lines. Since histone hypoacetylation plays important roles in the control of cell cycle progress and apoptosis, we hypothesized that histone hypoacetylation may be an unrevealed pathway in Ni(2+)-induced apoptosis. To address this, effects of Ni(2+) on cell apoptosis, bcl- 2 gene expression and histone acetylation were examined in human hepatoma Hep3B cells. We found that Ni(2+) treatment resulted in cell proliferation arrest, the appearance of detached cells, condensed chromatin, apoptotic bodies and specific DNA fragmentation, indicating the occurrence of cell apoptosis. At the same time, Ni(2+) induced a significant decrease in bcl- 2 expression and histone acetylation; the decrease of histone H4 acetylation in nucleosomes associated with the bcl- 2 promoter region was also proven by a chromatin immunoprecipitation assay, indicating the involvement of histone hypoacetylation in Ni(2+)-induced bcl- 2 down-regulation. Further studies showed that increasing histone acetylation by either 100 nM of trichostatin A or over-expressing histone acetyltranferase p300 in Hep3B cells obviously attenuated the bcl- 2 down-regulation and cell apoptosis caused by Ni(2+). Considering the importance of bcl- 2 in determining cell survival and apoptosis, the data presented here suggest that histone hypoacetylation may represent one unrevealed pathway in Ni(2+)-induced cell apoptosis, where bcl- 2 is one of its targets.     

Complete displacement of somatic histones during transformation of spermatid chromatin: a model experiment.

Displacement of histones from calf thymus chromatin has been studied in an attempt to postulate the mechanisms involved in the total removal of somatic-type histones during transformation of spermatid chromatin. When chromatin is saturated with protamine (protamine/DNA, 0.5), histone I becomes displaceable at 0.15-0.3 M NaCl, suggesting that direct replacement by highly basic sperm histone could be a mechanism for its removal. While histone I is the only histone which is extensively degraded upon incubation of chromatin and, therefore, proteolysis might provide an additional mechanism for the removal of this histone, acetylation of chromatin by acetic anhydride greatly increases suscpetibility of histones IIb1, IIb2, and III to the chromosomally associated protease. These histones are extensively degraded and displaced from the DNA upon incubation of the acetylated chromatin. Although histone IV is not appreciably degraded, the proteolytic removal of acetylated histone III from chromatin weakens the interaction of acetylated histone IV to the DNA, and this histone becomes dissociable at 0.3 M NaCl. A comparison of the extent of chemical acetylation of individual histones observed in this investigation with that of enzymatic acetylation which can be achieved in vivo suggests that acetylation and proteolysis could be a mechanism for the removal of histone IIb2 and III. The displacement of histones IIb1 and IV could be explained on the basis of decreased binding to DNA as a result of their acetylation together with the proteolytic removal of their respective partner histones, IIb2 and III.     

Acetylated lysine 56 on histone H3 drives chromatin assembly after repair and signals for the completion of repair

DNA damage causes checkpoint activation leading to cell cycle arrest and repair, during which the chromatin structure is disrupted. The mechanisms whereby chromatin structure and cell cycle progression are restored after DNA repair are largely unknown. We show that chromatin reassembly following double-strand break (DSB) repair requires the histone chaperone Asf1 and that absence of Asf1 causes cell death, as cells are unable to recover from the DNA damage checkpoint. We find that Asf1 contributes toward chromatin assembly after DSB repair by promoting acetylation of free histone H3 on lysine 56 (K56) via the histone acetyl transferase Rtt109. Mimicking acetylation of K56 bypasses the requirement for Asf1 for chromatin reassembly and checkpoint recovery, whereas mutations that prevent K56 acetylation block chromatin reassembly after repair. These results indicate that restoration of the chromatin following DSB repair is driven by acetylated H3 K56 and that this is a signal for the completion of repair.     

A cooperative activation loop among SWI/SNF, γ‐H2AX and H3 acetylation for DNA double‐strand break repair

Although recent studies highlight the importance of histone modifications and ATP‐dependent chromatin remodelling in DNA double‐strand break (DSB) repair, how these mechanisms cooperate has remained largely unexplored. Here, we show that the SWI/SNF chromatin remodelling complex, earlier known to facilitate the phosphorylation of histone H2AX at Ser‐139 (S139ph) after DNA damage, binds to γ‐H2AX (the phosphorylated form of H2AX)‐containing nucleosomes in S139ph‐dependent manner. Unexpectedly, BRG1, the catalytic subunit of SWI/SNF, binds to γ‐H2AX nucleosomes by interacting with acetylated H3, not with S139ph itself, through its bromodomain. Blocking the BRG1 interaction with γ‐H2AX nucleosomes either by deletion or overexpression of the BRG1 bromodomain leads to defect of S139ph and DSB repair. H3 acetylation is required for the binding of BRG1 to γ‐H2AX nucleosomes. S139ph stimulates the H3 acetylation on γ‐H2AX nucleosomes, and the histone acetyltransferase Gcn5 is responsible for this novel crosstalk. The H3 acetylation on γ‐H2AX nucleosomes is induced by DNA damage. These results collectively suggest that SWI/SNF, γ‐H2AX and H3 acetylation cooperatively act in a feedback activation loop to facilitate DSB repair.     

Activity banding of human chromosomes as shown by histone acetylation

The expression of genes in mammalian cells depends on many factors including position in the cell cycle, stage of differentiation, age, and environmental influences. As different groups of genes are expressed, their packaging within chromatin changes and may be detected at the chromsomal level. The organization of DNA within a chromosome is determined to a large extent by the positively charged, highly conserved histones. Histone subtypes and the reversible chemical modifications of histones have been associated with gene activity. Active or potentially active genes have been associated with hyperacetylated histones and inactive genes with nonacetylated histones. Sodium butyrate increases the acetylation levels of histones in cell cultures and acts as both an inducer of gene activity and as a cell-cycle block. We describe a method to label the interphase distribution of DNA associated with various histone acetylation stages on chromosomes. Nucleosomes from untreated and butyrate-treated HeLa cells were fractionated by their acetylation level and the associated DNA labeled, and hybridized to normal human chromosomes. In the sodium butyrate-treated cells the resulting banding patterns of the high- and low-acetylated fractions were strikingly different. DNA from low-acetylated chromatin labeled several pericentric regions, whereas hybridization with DNA from highly acetylated chromatin resulted in a pattern similar to inverse G-bands on many chromsomes. The results from noninduced cells at both high and low acetylation levels were noticeably different from their induced counterparts. The capture and hybridization of DNA from interphase chromatin at different acetylation states provides a “snap-shot” of the distribution of gene activity on chromosomes at the time of cell harvest. Edited by: P.B. Moens     

Histone hypoacetylation is required to maintain late replication timing of constitutive heterochromatin

The replication of the genome is a spatio-temporally highly organized process. Yet, its flexibility throughout development suggests that this process is not genetically regulated. However, the mechanisms and chromatin modifications controlling replication timing are still unclear. We made use of the prominent structure and defined heterochromatic landscape of pericentric regions as an example of late replicating constitutive heterochromatin. We manipulated the major chromatin markers of these regions, namely histone acetylation, DNA and histone methylation, as well as chromatin condensation and determined the effects of these altered chromatin states on replication timing. Here, we show that manipulation of DNA and histone methylation as well as acetylation levels caused large-scale heterochromatin decondensation. Histone demethylation and the concomitant decondensation, however, did not affect replication timing. In contrast, immuno-FISH and time-lapse analyses showed that lowering DNA methylation, as well as increasing histone acetylation, advanced the onset of heterochromatin replication. While dnmt1(-)(/)(-) cells showed increased histone acetylation at chromocenters, histone hyperacetylation did not induce DNA demethylation. Hence, we propose that histone hypoacetylation is required to maintain normal heterochromatin duplication dynamics. We speculate that a high histone acetylation level might increase the firing efficiency of origins and, concomitantly, advances the replication timing of distinct genomic regions.     

O2 sensing: only skin deep?

In this issue, two papers implicate histone H3 lysine 56 acetylation in histone deposition in chromatin. Li et al. (2008) show that acetylation of H3K56 promotes S phase chromatin assembly that is mediated by the histone chaperones CAF-1 and Rtt106. Chen et al. (2008) establish that the acetylation mark promotes chromatin reassembly following DNA double-strand break repair.     

Sir2 and the acetyltransferase, Pat, regulate the archaeal chromatin protein, Alba

The DNA binding affinity of Alba, a chromatin protein of the archaeon Sulfolobus solfataricus P2, is regulated by acetylation of lysine 16. Here we identify an acetyltransferase that specifically acetylates Alba on this residue. The effect of acetylation is to lower the affinity of Alba for DNA. Remarkably, the acetyltransferase is conserved not only in archaea but also in bacteria where it appears to play a role in metabolic regulation. Therefore, our data suggest that S. solfataricus has co-opted this bacterial regulatory system to generate a rudimentary form of chromatin regulation.     

Acetylation of Histone H2AX at Lys 5 by the TIP60 Histone Acetyltransferase Complex Is Essential for the Dynamic Binding of NBS1 to Damaged Chromatin

The association and dissociation of DNA damage response (DDR) factors with damaged chromatin occurs dynamically, which is crucial for the activation of DDR signaling in a spatiotemporal manner. We previously showed that the TIP60 histone acetyltransferase complex acetylates histone H2AX, to facilitate H2AX exchange at sites of DNA damage. However, it remained unclear how the acetylation of histone H2AX by TIP60 is related to the DDR signaling. We found that the acetylation but not the phosphorylation of H2AX is essential for the turnover of NBS1 on damaged chromatin. The loss of H2AX acetylation at Lys 5 by TIP60 in cells disturbed the accumulation of NBS1 at sites of DNA damage. Although the phosphorylation of H2AX is also reportedly required for the retention of NBS1 at damage sites, our data indicated that the acetylation-dependent NBS1 turnover by TIP60 on damaged chromatin restricts the dispersal of NBS1 foci from the sites of DNA damage. These findings indicate the importance of the acetylation-dependent dynamic binding of NBS1 to damaged chromatin, created by histone H2AX exchange, for the proper accumulation of NBS1 at DNA damage sites.