A synthetic theory of molecular evolution

According to the neo-Darwinian view of evolution evolution rate nu depends solely on the environment variation rate gamma, whereas in the non-Darwinian view evolution rate is determined mainly by the mutation rate mu. We have studied two kinds of population genetics models which exhibit both types of evolution in different parametric regions: one is a dynamical model representing infinite population, and the other is a Markov process model representing a nearly monomorphic finite population. In the infinite population model, after proving general time-derivative and mu-derivative formulas for the population average of quantitative traits, we show that if the mutation rate is adaptively determined, mu must be larger than nu in the stationary state. Loads of evolution are obtained in both regions. A high evolution rate such as nu = 1 per genome per generation is consistent with Haldane's value of tolerable load if and only if the functional constraint is not large and selection is weak, independent of whether the evolution is neo-Darwinian or non-Darwinian. As the selection intensity increases, nu is shown to change discontinuously from nearly mu to gamma at the transition point. In the finite population model, the transition of v is not discontinuous, but is very steep. On the other hand, no steep change of polymorphism takes place at the transition point. The steepness of the transition in our model suggests that real molecular evolution can be divided into either neo-Darwinian or non-Darwinian,and that the intermediate type of evolution is rather rare.     

The synthetic theory of evolution: general problems and the German contribution to the synthesis

Summary A metatheoretical and historiographical re-analysis of the Evolutionary Synthesis (the process) and the Synthetic Theory (the result) leads to the following conclusion: The Synthetic Theory is not a reductionistic, but rather a structuralistic theory with a limited range of relevant hierarchical levels. Historically the Synthesis was not a sudden event but a rational long-term project carried out between 1930 and 1950 by a large number of biologists in several countries. In the second part of our paper the contributions of several German biologists to the Synthesis are analyzed.     

The theory of the evolution of dominance

Journal of Genetics - In a population which is mainly self-fertilized the majority of nonlethal mutant genes are present in homozygotes and very few in heterozygotes. The intensity of selection for...     

Neutral theory of molecular evolution

DNA sequence data are generally interpreted as favouring Kimura's neutral theory but not without dissent and often with a great deal of controversy with respect to molecular clocks, DNA polymorphism, adaptive evolution, and gene genealogy. Although the theory serves as a guiding principle, many issues concerning mutation, recombination, and selection remain unsettled. Of particular importance is the need for more knowledge about the function and structure of molecules.     

A thermodynamic theory of evolution

As a closed thermodynamic system subject to an essentially constant free energy gradient, the biosphere must evolve toward a stationary state of maximum structuring and minimum dissipation with respect to this applied gradient. Since biological evolution occurs opportunistically through chance and selection, rather than as a direct response to the free energy gradient, the conformance of this phase of evolution with thermodynamics requires that natural selection, and the particular adaptive strategies employed by species of organisms, be related to the principles of increasing structuring and decreasing dissipation. In this paper, some general features of this relationship are proposed.     

Role of microorganisms in the evolution of animals and plants: the hologenome theory of evolution

We present here the hologenome theory of evolution, which considers the holobiont (the animal or plant with all of its associated microorganisms) as a unit of selection in evolution. The hologenome is defined as the sum of the genetic information of the host and its microbiota. The theory is based on four generalizations: (1) All animals and plants establish symbiotic relationships with microorganisms. (2) Symbiotic microorganisms are transmitted between generations. (3) The association between host and symbionts affects the fitness of the holobiont within its environment. (4) Variation in the hologenome can be brought about by changes in either the host or the microbiota genomes; under environmental stress, the symbiotic microbial community can change rapidly. These points taken together suggest that the genetic wealth of diverse microbial symbionts can play an important role both in adaptation and in evolution of higher organisms. During periods of rapid changes in the environment, the diverse microbial symbiont community can aid the holobiont in surviving, multiplying and buying the time necessary for the host genome to evolve. The distinguishing feature of the hologenome theory is that it considers all of the diverse microbiota associated with the animal or the plant as part of the evolving holobiont. Thus, the hologenome theory fits within the framework of the 'superorganism' proposed by Wilson and Sober.     

The main postulate of the vertical evolution theory

In the series of previous publications by the author (2000, 2002, 2005), a genetic model explaining the phenomenon of evolutionary progress was presented. In the present paper, this model is described in general terms. The model is based on views on regular changes of ecological potential of organisms on a macroevolutionary time scale. According to these views, macroevolution has its own pattern, which cannot be seen in the microevolutionary process. Hence, the statement of the synthetic theory of evolution that "macroevolution proceeds via microevolution" is incorrect.     

Game theory and the evolution of behaviour.

How far can game theory account for the evolution of contest behaviour in animals? The first qualitative prediction of the theory was that symmetric contests in which escalation is expensive should lead to mixed strategies. As yet it is hard to say how far this is borne out, because of the difficulty of distinguishing a 'mixed evolutionarily stable strategy' maintained by frequency-dependent selection from a 'pure conditional strategy'; the distinction is discussed in relation to several field studies. The second prediction was that if a contest is asymmetric (e.g. in ownership) then the asymmetry will be used as a conventional cue to settle it. This prediction has been well supported by observation. A third important issue is whether or not information about intentions is exchanged during contests. The significance of 'assessment' strategies is discussed.     

Directionality theory and the evolution of body size

Directionality theory, a dynamic theory of evolution that integrates population genetics with demography, is based on the concept of evolutionary entropy, a measure of the variability in the age of reproducing individuals in a population. The main tenets of the theory are three principles relating the response to the ecological constraints a population experiences, with trends in entropy as the population evolves under mutation and natural selection. (i) Stationary size or fluctuations around a stationary size (bounded growth): a unidirectional increase in entropy; (ii) prolonged episodes of exponential growth (unbounded growth), large population size: a unidirectional decrease in entropy; and (iii) prolonged episodes of exponential growth (unbounded growth), small population size: random, non-directional change in entropy. We invoke these principles, together with an allometric relationship between entropy, and the morphometric variable body size, to provide evolutionary explanations of three empirical patterns pertaining to trends in body size, namely (i) Cope's rule, the tendency towards size increase within phyletic lineages; (ii) the island rule, which pertains to changes in body size that occur as species migrate from mainland populations to colonize island habitats; and (iii) Bergmann's rule, the tendency towards size increase with increasing latitude. The observation that these ecotypic patterns can be explained in terms of the directionality principles for entropy underscores the significance of evolutionary entropy as a unifying concept in forging a link between micro-evolution, the dynamics of gene frequency change, and macro-evolution, dynamic changes in morphometric variables.     

Game theory and the evolution of fearfulness in wild birds

When animals in a group live under predation threat, the fate of each individual depends on the way it reacts to danger, but also on the behaviour of its companions. Game theory should then help to understand the evolution of fearful behaviour in gregarious animals. To illustrate this approach, a model determines evolutionarily stable levels of fearfulness in bird flocks, assuming that flocks are the object of both predatory attacks and nonlethal disturbance. In the model, high levels of flightiness limit the risk of being killed by predators, but increase the amount of energy lost in flights during the season. The predicted levels of fearfulness are extremely variable. They depend on the respective frequencies of predatory attacks and simple disturbing events, and on the capacity of birds to detect and escape predators. These results may help to explain the variability of flightiness reported in birds.     

Social evolution theory for microorganisms

Microorganisms communicate and cooperate to perform a wide range of multicellular behaviours, such as dispersal, nutrient acquisition, biofilm formation and quorum sensing. Microbiologists are rapidly gaining a greater understanding of the molecular mechanisms involved in these behaviours, and the underlying genetic regulation. Such behaviours are also interesting from the perspective of social evolution - why do microorganisms engage in these behaviours given that cooperative individuals can be exploited by selfish cheaters, who gain the benefit of cooperation without paying their share of the cost? There is great potential for interdisciplinary research in this fledgling field of sociomicrobiology, but a limiting factor is the lack of effective communication of social evolution theory to microbiologists. Here, we provide a conceptual overview of the different mechanisms through which cooperative behaviours can be stabilized, emphasizing the aspects most relevant to microorganisms, the novel problems that microorganisms pose and the new insights that can be gained from applying evolutionary theory to microorganisms.