Regulation of mammalian translation factors by nutrients.

Protein synthesis requires both amino acids, as precursors, and a substantial amount of metabolic energy. It is well established that starvation or lack of nutrients impairs protein synthesis in mammalian cells and tissues. Branched chain amino acids are particularly effective in promoting protein synthesis. Recent work has revealed important new information about the mechanisms involved in these effects. A number of components of the translational machinery are regulated through signalling events that require the mammalian target of rapamycin, mTOR. These include translational repressor proteins (eukaryotic initiation factor 4E-binding proteins, 4E-BPs) and protein kinases that act upon the small ribosomal subunit (S6 kinases). Amino acids, especially leucine, positively regulate mTOR signalling thereby relieving inhibition of translation by 4E-BPs and activating the S6 kinases, which can also regulate translation elongation. However, the molecular mechanisms by which amino acids modulate mTOR signalling remain unclear. Protein synthesis requires a high proportion of the cell's metabolic energy, and recent work has revealed that metabolic energy, or fuels such as glucose, also regulate targets of the mTOR pathway. Amino acids and glucose modulate a further important regulatory step in translation initiation, the activity of the guanine nucleotide-exchange factor eIF2B. eIF2B controls the recruitment of the initiator methionyl-tRNA to the ribosome and is activated by insulin. However, in the absence of glucose or amino acids, insulin no longer activates eIF2B. Since control of eIF2B is independent of mTOR, these data indicate the operation of additional, and so far unknown, regulatory mechanisms that control eIF2B activity.     

Stable isotope-labelling analysis of the impact of inhibition of the mammalian target of rapamycin on protein synthesis

mTORC1 [mTOR (mammalian target of rapamycin) complex 1] regulates diverse cell functions. mTORC1 controls the phosphorylation of several proteins involved in mRNA translation and the translation of specific mRNAs, including those containing a 5'-TOP (5'-terminal oligopyrimidine). To date, most of the proteins encoded by known 5'-TOP mRNAs are proteins involved in mRNA translation, such as ribosomal proteins and elongation factors. Rapamycin inhibits some mTORC1 functions, whereas mTOR-KIs (mTOR kinase inhibitors) interfere with all of them. mTOR-KIs inhibit overall protein synthesis more strongly than rapamycin. To study the effects of rapamycin or mTOR-KIs on synthesis of specific proteins, we applied pSILAC [pulsed SILAC (stable isotope-labelling with amino acids in cell culture)]. Our results reveal, first, that mTOR-KIs and rapamycin differentially affect the synthesis of many proteins. Secondly, mTOR-KIs inhibit the synthesis of proteins encoded by 5'-TOP mRNAs much more strongly than rapamycin does, revealing that these mRNAs are controlled by rapamycin-insensitive outputs from mTOR. Thirdly, the synthesis of certain other proteins shows a similar pattern of inhibition. Some of them appear to be encoded by 'novel' 5'-TOP mRNAs; they include proteins which, like known 5'-TOP mRNA-encoded proteins, are involved in protein synthesis, whereas others are enzymes involved in intermediary or anabolic metabolism. These results indicate that mTOR signalling may promote diverse biosynthetic processes through the translational up-regulation of specific mRNAs. Lastly, a SILAC-based approach revealed that, although rapamycin and mTOR-KIs have little effect on general protein stability, they stabilize proteins encoded by 5'-TOP mRNAs.     

MAP kinase pathways as regulators of fungal virulence

MAP kinases are dual phosphorylated protein kinases, present in eukaryotes, which mediate differentiation programs and immune responses in mammalian cells. In pathogenic fungi, MAP kinases are key elements that control adaptation to environmental stress. Recent studies have shown that these pathways have an essential role in the control of essential virulence factors such as capsule biogenesis in Cryptococcus neoformans or morphogenesis, invasion and oxidative stress in Candida albicans. Although MAP kinases sense different activating signals, there is a considerable degree of crosstalk and/or overlap, which enables them to integrate, amplify and modulate the appropriate protective and adaptive response. MAP kinases behave as a 'functional nervous system' that controls virulence and influences the progression of the disease.     

Mechanisms through which sulfur amino acids control protein metabolism and oxidative status

Amino acids regulate protein synthesis and breakdown (i.e., protein turnover) and consequently protein deposition, which corresponds to the balance between the two processes. Elucidating the mechanisms involved in such regulation is important from fundamental and applied points of view since it can provide a basis to optimize amino acid requirements and to control protein mass, body composition and so forth. Amino acids, which have long been considered simply as precursors of protein synthesis, are now recognized to exert other significant influences; that is, they are precursors of essential molecules, act as mediators or signal molecules and affect numerous functions. For example, amino acids act as mediators of metabolic pathways in the same manner as certain hormones. Thus, they modulate the activity of intracellular protein kinases involved in the regulation of metabolic pathways such as mRNA translation. We provide here an overview of the roles of amino acids as regulators of protein metabolism, by focusing particularly on sulfur amino acids. The potential importance of methionine as a "nutrient signal" is discussed in the light of recent findings. Emphasis is also placed on mechanisms controlling oxidative status since sulfur amino acids are involved in the synthesis of intracellular antioxidants (glutathione, taurine etc.) and in the methionine sulfoxide reductase antioxidant system.     

The interferon-induced double-stranded RNA-activated protein kinase PKR will phosphorylate serine, threonine, or tyrosine at residue 51 in eukaryotic initiation factor 2alpha.

The family of eukaryotic initiation factor 2alpha (eIF2alpha) protein kinases plays an important role in regulating cellular protein synthesis under stress conditions. The mammalian kinases PKR and HRI and the yeast kinase GCN2 specifically phosphorylate Ser-51 on the alpha subunit of the translation initiation factor eIF2. By using an in vivo assay in yeast, the substrate specificity of these three eIF2alpha kinases was examined by substituting Ser-51 in eIF2alpha with Thr or Tyr. In yeast, phosphorylation of eIF2 inhibits general translation but derepresses translation of the GCN4 mRNA. All three kinases phosphorylated Thr in place of Ser-51 and were able to regulate general and GCN4-specific translation. In addition, both PKR and HRI were found to phosphorylate eIF2alpha-S51Y and stimulate GCN4 expression. Isoelectric focusing analysis of eIF2alpha followed by detection using anti-eIF2alpha and anti-phosphotyrosine-specific antibodies demonstrated that PKR and HRI phosphorylated eIF2alpha-S51Y on Tyr in vivo. These results provide new insights into the substrate recognition properties of the eIF2alpha kinases, and they are intriguing considering the potential for alternate substrates for PKR in cellular signaling and growth control pathways.     

Protein synthesis inhibition by flavonoids: roles of eukaryotic initiation factor 2alpha kinases

Flavonoids such as genistein and quercetin suppress tumor cell growth in vitro and in vivo. Many metabolic enzymes, including protein kinases, are known to be inhibited by flavonoids, yet the molecular targets and biochemical mechanisms of the tumor growth suppression remain unclear. Here, we find that flavonoids inhibit protein synthesis in both mouse and human leukemia cells. This inhibition is associated with phosphorylation of the alpha-subunit of eukaryotic initiation factor 2 (eIF2alpha), a key regulatory mechanism of protein translation. Three mammalian eIF2alpha kinases have been identified: the interferon-inducible double-stranded RNA-dependent kinase (PKR), the heme-regulated inhibitor (HRI), and the very recently discovered PERK/PEK. We find that all of these eIF2alpha kinases can be activated by quercetin and genistein, indicating redundant roles of the eIF2alpha kinases. Thus, activation of eIF2alpha kinases appears to be a mechanism by which flavonoids can inhibit the growth of tumor and leukemia cells.     

The mTOR regulated RNA-binding protein LARP1 requires PABPC1 for guided mRNA interaction

The mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) is a critical regulator of cell growth, integrating multiple signalling cues and pathways. Key among the downstream activities of mTOR is the control of the protein synthesis machinery. This is achieved, in part, via the co-ordinated regulation of mRNAs that contain a terminal oligopyrimidine tract (TOP) at their 5′ends, although the mechanisms by which this occurs downstream of mTOR signalling are still unclear. We used RNA-binding protein (RBP) capture to identify changes in the protein-RNA interaction landscape following mTOR inhibition. Upon mTOR inhibition, the binding of LARP1 to a number of mRNAs, including TOP-containing mRNAs, increased. Importantly, non-TOP-containing mRNAs bound by LARP1 are in a translationally-repressed state, even under control conditions. The mRNA interactome of the LARP1-associated protein PABPC1 was found to have a high degree of overlap with that of LARP1 and our data show that PABPC1 is required for the association of LARP1 with its specific mRNA targets. Finally, we demonstrate that mRNAs, including those encoding proteins critical for cell growth and survival, are translationally repressed when bound by both LARP1 and PABPC1.     

A leaderless mRNA can bind to mammalian 80S ribosomes and direct polypeptide synthesis in the absence of translation initiation factors

Translation initiation in eukaryotic cells is known to be a complex multistep process which involves numerous protein factors. Here we demonstrate that leaderless mRNAs with initiator Met-tRNA can bind directly to 80S mammalian ribosomes in the absence of initiation factors and that the complexes thus formed are fully competent for the subsequent steps of polypeptide synthesis. We show that the canonical 48S pathway of eukaryotic translation initiation has no obvious advantage over the 80S pathway of translation initiation on leaderless mRNAs and suggest that, in the presence of competing mRNAs containing a leader, the latter mechanism will be preferred. The direct binding of the leaderless mRNA to the 80S ribosome was precluded when such an mRNA was supplied with a 5' leader, irrespective of whether it was in a totally single-stranded conformation or was prone to base pairing. The striking similarity between the mechanisms of binding of leaderless mRNAs with mammalian 80S or bacterial 70S ribosomes gives support to the idea that the alternative mode of translation initiation used by leaderless mRNAs represents a relic from early steps in the evolution of the translation apparatus.     

Translation acrobatics: how cancer cells exploit alternate modes of translational initiation

Recent work has brought to light many different mechanisms of translation initiation that function in cells in parallel to canonical cap‐dependent initiation. This has important implications for cancer. Canonical cap‐dependent translation initiation is inhibited by many stresses such as hypoxia, nutrient limitation, proteotoxic stress, or genotoxic stress. Since cancer cells are often exposed to these stresses, they rely on alternate modes of translation initiation for protein synthesis and cell growth. Cancer mutations are now being identified in components of the translation machinery and in cis‐regulatory elements of mRNAs, which both control translation of cancer‐relevant genes. In this review, we provide an overview on the various modes of non‐canonical translation initiation, such as leaky scanning, translation re‐initiation, ribosome shunting, IRES‐dependent translation, and m⁶A‐dependent translation, and then discuss the influence of stress on these different modes of translation. Finally, we present examples of how these modes of translation are dysregulated in cancer cells, allowing them to grow, to proliferate, and to survive, thereby highlighting the importance of translational control in cancer.     

Tinkering with Translation: Protein Synthesis in Virus-Infected Cells

Viruses are obligate intracellular parasites, and their replication requires host cell functions. Although the size, composition, complexity, and functions encoded by their genomes are remarkably diverse, all viruses rely absolutely on the protein synthesis machinery of their host cells. Lacking their own translational apparatus, they must recruit cellular ribosomes in order to translate viral mRNAs and produce the protein products required for their replication. In addition, there are other constraints on viral protein production. Crucially, host innate defenses and stress responses capable of inactivating the translation machinery must be effectively neutralized. Furthermore, the limited coding capacity of the viral genome needs to be used optimally. These demands have resulted in complex interactions between virus and host that exploit ostensibly virus-specific mechanisms and, at the same time, illuminate the functioning of the cellular protein synthesis apparatus.The dependence of viruses on the host translation system imposes constraints that are central to virus biology and have led to specialized mechanisms and intricate regulatory interactions. Failure to translate viral mRNAs and to modulate host mRNA translation would have catastrophic effects on virus replication, spread, and evolution. Accordingly, a wide assortment of virus-encoded functions is dedicated to commandeering and controlling the cellular translation apparatus. Viral strategies to dominate the host translation machinery target the initiation, elongation, and termination steps and include mechanisms ranging from the manipulation of key eukaryotic translation factors to the evolution of specialized cis-acting elements that recruit ribosomes or modify genome-coding capacity. Because many of these strategies have likely been pirated from their hosts and because virus genetic systems can be manipulated with relative ease, the study of viruses has been a preeminent source of information on the mechanism and regulation of the protein synthesis machinery. In this article, we focus on select viruses that infect mammalian or plant cells and review the mechanisms they use to exploit and control the cellular protein synthesis machinery.