Effect of ermC leader region mutations on induced mRNA stability.

Induction of translation of the ermC gene product in Bacillus subtilis occurs upon exposure to erythromycin and is a result of ribosome stalling in the ermC leader peptide coding sequence. Another result of ribosome stalling is stabilization of ermC mRNA. The effect of leader RNA secondary structure, methylase translation, and leader peptide translation on induced ermC mRNA stability was examined by constructing various mutations in the ermC leader region. Analysis of deletion mutations showed that ribosome stalling causes induction of ermC mRNA stability in the absence of methylase translation and ermC leader RNA secondary structure. Furthermore, deletions that removed much of the leader peptide coding sequence had no effect on induced ermC mRNA stability. A leader region mutation was constructed such that ribosome stalling occurred in a position upstream of the natural stall site, resulting in induced mRNA stability without induction of translation. This mutation was used to measure the effect of mRNA stabilization on ermC gene expression.     

Translation attenuation regulation of chloramphenicol resistance in bacteria — a review

The chloramphenicol (Cm)-inducible cat and cmlA genes are regulated by translation attenuation, a regulatory device that modulates mRNA translation. In this form of gene regulation, translation of the Cm^R coding sequence is prevented by mRNA secondary structure that sequesters its ribosome-binding site (RBS). A translated leader of nine codons precedes the secondary structure, and induction results when a ribosome becomes stalled at a specific site in the leader. Here we demonstrate that the site of ribosome stalling in the leader is selected by a cis effect of the nascent leader peptide on its translating ribosome.     

Site in the cat-86 regulatory leader that permits amicetin to induce expression of the gene.

Expression of the plasmid gene cat-86 is induced in Bacillus subtilis by two antibiotics, chloramphenicol and the nucleoside antibiotic amicetin. We proposed that induction by either drug causes the destabilization of a stem-loop structure in cat-86 mRNA that sequesters the ribosome-binding site for the cat coding sequence. The destabilization event frees the ribosome-binding site, permitting the initiation of translation of cat-86 mRNA. cat-86 induction is due to the stalling of a ribosome in a leader region of cat-86 mRNA, which is located 5' to the RNA stem-loop structure. A stalled ribosome that is active in cat-86 induction has its aminoacyl site occupied by leader codon 6. To test the hypothesis that a leader site 5' to codon 6 permits a ribosome to stall in the presence of an inducing antibiotic, we inserted an extra codon between leader codons 5 and 6. This insertion blocked induction, which was then restored by the deletion of leader codon 6. Thus, induction seems to require the maintenance of a precise spatial relationship between an upstream leader site(s) and leader codon 6. Mutations in the ribosome-binding site for the cat-86 leader, RBS-2, which decreased its strength of binding to 16S rRNA, prevented induction. In contrast, mutations that significantly altered the sequence of RBS-2 but increased its strength of binding to 16S rRNA did not block induction by either chloramphenicol or amicetin. We therefore suspected that the proposed leader site that permitted drug-mediated stalling was located between RBS-2 and leader codon 6. This region of the cat-86 leader contains an eight-nucleotide sequence (conserved region I) that is largely conserved among all known cat leaders. The codon immediately 5' to conserved region I differs, however, between amicetin-inducible and amicetin-noninducible cat genes. In amicetin-inducible cat genes such as cat-86, the codon 5' to conserved region I is a valine codon, GTG. The same codon in amicetin-noninducible cat genes is a lysine codon, either AAA or AAG. When the GTG codon immediately 5' to conserved region I in cat-86 was changed to AAA, amicetin was no longer active in cat-86 induction, but chloramphenicol induction was unaffected by the mutation. The potential role of the GTG codon in amicetin induction is discussed.     

Induction of cat-86 by chloramphenicol and amino acid starvation in relaxed mutants of Bacillus subtilis

The chloramphenicol acetyltransferase gene cat-86 is induced through a mechanism that is a variation of classical attenuation. Induction results from the destabilization of an RNA stem-loop that normally sequesters the cat-86 ribosome-binding site. Destabilization of the stem-loop is due to the stalling of a ribosome in the leader region of cat-86 mRNA at a position that places the A site of the stalled ribosome at leader codon 6. Two events can stall ribosomes at the correct location to induce cat-86 translation: addition of chloramphenicol to cells and starvation of cells for the amino acid specified by leader codon 6. Induction by amino acid starvation is an anomaly because translation of the cat-86 coding sequence requires all 20 amino acids. To explain this apparent contradiction we postulated that amino acid starvation triggers intracellular proteolysis, thereby providing levels of the deprived amino acid sufficient for cat-86 translation. Here we show that a mutation in relA, the structural gene for stringent factor, blocks intracellular proteolysis that is normally triggered by amino acid starvation. The relA mutation also blocks induction of cat-86 by amino acid starvation, but the mutation does not interfere with chloramphenicol induction. Induction by amino acid starvation can be demonstrated in relA mutant cells if the depleted amino acid is restored at very low levels (e.g., 2 micrograms/ml). A mutation in relC, which may be the gene for ribosomal protein L11, blocks induction of cat-86 by either chloramphenicol or amino acid starvation. We believe this effect is due to a structural alteration of the ribosome resulting from the relC mutation and not to the relaxed phenotype of the cells.     

Induction of ermC requires translation of the leader peptide.

ermC confers resistance to macrolide-lincosamide streptogramin B antibiotics by specifying a ribosomal RNA methylase, which results in decreased ribosomal affinity for these antibiotics. ermC expression is induced by exposure to erythromycin. We have previously proposed a translational regulation model in which erythromycin causes stalling of a ribosome, which is translating a leader peptide. Stalling causes a conformation shift in the ermC mRNA which in turn unmasks the methylase ribosomal binding site. A prediction of this translational attenuation model for ermC induction was tested by replacing the second codon of the putative ermC leader peptide coding region by TAA. As expected, the introduction of this mutation resulted in an uninducible phenotype which was suppressible by two ochre suppressor mutations in Bacillus subtilis. It is concluded that translation through the leader peptide coding region, in frame with the predicted leader peptide, is required for ermC induction.     

Four codons in the cat-86 leader define a chloramphenicol-sensitive ribosome stall sequence.

Genes encoding chloramphenicol acetyltransferase in gram-positive bacteria are induced by chloramphenicol. Induction reflects an ability of the drug to stall a ribosome at a specific site in cat leader mRNA. Ribosome stalling at this site alters downstream RNA secondary structure, thereby unmasking the ribosome-binding site for the cat coding sequence. Here, we show that ribosome stalling in the cat-86 leader is a function of leader codons 2 through 5 and that stalling requires these codons to be presented in the correct reading frame. Codons 2 through 5 specify Val-Lys-Thr-Asp. Insertion of a second copy of the stall sequence 5' to the authentic stall sequence diminished cat-86 induction fivefold. Thus, the stall sequence can function in ribosome stalling when the stall sequence is displaced from the downstream RNA secondary structure. We suggest that the stall sequence may function in cat induction at two levels. First, the tetrapeptide specified by the stall sequence likely plays an active role in the induction strategy, on the basis of previously reported genetic suppression studies (W. W. Mulbry, N. P. Ambulos, Jr., and P.S. Lovett, J. Bacteriol. 171:5322-5324, 1989). Second, we show that embedded within the stall sequence of cat leaders is a region which is complementary to a sequence internal in 16S rRNA of Bacillus subtilis. This complementarity may guide a ribosome to the proper position on leader mRNA or potentiate the stalling event, or both. The region of complementarity is absent from Escherichia coli 16S rRNA, and cat genes induce poorly, or not at all, in E. coli.     

Leader peptides of inducible chloramphenicol resistance genes from gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria bind to yeast and Archaea large subunit rRNA.

catA86 is the second gene in a constitutively transcribed, two-gene operon cloned from Bacillus pumilus . The region that intervenes between the upstream gene, termed the leader, and the catA86 coding sequence contains a pair of inverted repeat sequences which cause sequestration of the catA86 ribosome binding site in mRNA secondary structure. As a consequence, the catA86 coding sequence is untranslatable in the absence of inducer. Translation of the catA86 coding sequence is induced by chloramphenicol in Gram-positives and induction requires a function of the leader coding sequence. The leader-encoded peptide has been proposed to instruct its translating ribosome to pause at leader codon 6, enabling chloramphenicol to stall the ribosome at that site. Ribosome stalling causes destabilization of the RNA secondary structure, exposing the catA86 ribosome binding site, allowing activation of its translation. A comparable mechanism of induction by chloramphenicol has been proposed for the regulated cmlA gene from Gram-negative bacteria. The catA86 and cmlA leader-encoded peptides are in vitro inhibitors of peptidyl transferase, which is thought to be the basis for selection of the site of ribosome stalling. Both leader-encoded peptides have been shown to alter the secondary structure of Escherichia coli 23S rRNA in vitro. All peptide-induced changes in rRNA conformation are within domains IV and V, which contains the peptidyl transferase center. Here we demonstrate that the leader peptides alter the conformation of domains IV and V of large subunit rRNA from yeast and a representative of the Archaea. The rRNA target for binding the leader peptides is therefore conserved across kingdoms.     

Properties of a pentapeptide inhibitor of peptidyltransferase that is essential for cat gene regulation by translation attenuation.

Inducible chloramphenicol resistance genes cat and cmlA are regulated by translation attenuation. For both genes, the leader codons that must be translated to deliver a ribosome to the induction site specify a peptide that inhibits peptidyltransferase in vitro. The antipeptidyltransferase activity of the peptides is thought to select the site of ribosome stalling that is essential for induction. Using variations of the cat-86 leader-encoded 5-mer peptide MVKTD, we demonstrate a correlation between the in vitro antipeptidyltransferase activity and the ability of the same peptide to support induction by chloramphenicol in vivo. MVKTD footprints to nucleotides 2058, 2059, and 2060 in 23S rRNA. In vivo methylation of nucleotide 2058 by the ermC methylase interferes neither with cat-86 induction nor with peptide inhibition of peptidyltransferase. The methylation eliminates the competition that normally occurs in vitro between erythromycin and MVKTD. MVKTD inhibits the peptidyltransferase of several eubacteria, a representative Archaea species, and the eukaryote Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Bacillus stearothermophilus supports the in vivo induction of cat-86, and the RNA that is phenol extracted from the 50S ribosomes of this gram-positive thermophile is catalytically active in the peptidyltransferase assay and sensitive to peptide inhibition. Our results indicate that peptidyltransferase inhibition by a cat leader peptide is essential to induction, and this activity can be altered by minor changes in the amino acid sequence of the peptide. The broad range of organisms shown to possess peptide-inhibitable peptidyltransferase suggests that the target is a highly conserved component of the ribosome and includes 23S rRNA.     

Analysis of the regulatory sequences needed for induction of the chloramphenicol acetyltransferase gene cat-86 by chloramphenicol and amicetin.

Induction of the chloramphenicol acetyltransferase gene cat-86 in Bacillus subtilis results from the activation of translation of cat-86 mRNA. The inducers, chloramphenicol and amicetin, are thought to enable ribosomes to destabilize a stem-loop structure in cat-86 mRNA that sequesters the ribosome binding site for the cat-86 coding sequence, designated RBS-3. The region of cat-86 mRNA which is 5' to the stem-loop contained two additional ribosome binding sites, RBS-1 and RBS-2, located 84 and 56 nucleotides, respectively, upstream from RBS-3. RBS-1 and RBS-2 were each followed by a potential translation initiation codon and a short open reading frame. Bal 31-generated deletions into the 5' end of the regulatory region that removed RBS-1 but did not enter RBS-2 caused a fourfold decrease in the uninduced and chloramphenicol-induced level of cat-86 expression and a more than 10-fold reduction in the amicetin-induced level of expression. Deletions that removed both RBS-1 and RBS-2 but did not enter the stem-loop abolished both chloramphenicol- and amicetin-inducible expression. These data indicate that RBS-2 and sequences 3' to RBS-2 are minimally essential to chloramphenicol induction. However, the presence of RBS-1 in the mRNA elevated the maximum level of expression obtained during chloramphenicol induction. These studies also demonstrate that induction of cat-86 by amicetin is highly dependent on RBS-1. To determine whether a correlation existed between RBS-1 and amicetin inducibility, we examined the sequence of the regulatory regions for two natural variants of cat-86, cat-66 and cat-57, which are chloramphenicol inducible but are very poorly induced by amicetin. Both contained nucleotide sequence differences from cat-86 in the vicinity of RBS-1 that would prevent translation of the leader peptide associated with RBS-1 in cat-86. In contrast, the regulatory regions got the three genes were virtually identical in the vicinity of RBS-2. These data indicate that efficient induction by amicetin requires sequences that are not essential for induction by chloramphenicol.