Immediate breast reconstruction with tissue expansion

Between October of 1983 and June of 1985, 31 patients underwent primary breast reconstruction with tissue expansion. Tissue expansion was utilized for breast reconstruction when the remaining muscle and skin following modified radical mastectomy was insufficient to accommodate a prosthesis that matched in size and shape the opposite breast. All expanders were placed beneath an investing muscular pocket created by elevating the pectoralis major and serratus anterior. Postoperative expansion began within 1 week, and the breast was expanded to double the volume of the opposite breast. Twenty-two patients have completed their reconstruction with a mean follow-up in 7 months. There were nine complications, including five deflations and four infections. All patients have remained Baker I or Baker II. Creating ptosis to match the breast was accomplished by placing the expander below the rectus fascia and superiorly advancing this expanded tissue at the time of prosthesis placement. Primary breast reconstruction with tissue expansion following modified radical mastectomy is safe, simple, and produces a breast with excellent shape, size, texture, and patient satisfaction.     

Continuous versus conventional tissue expansion: experimental verification of a new technique

Historically, tissue expansion is a prolonged process, typically requiring at least 6 weeks to complete. Recently, interest has increased in shortening this time period. In the current study, a continuous infusion device maintaining constant expander pressure less than capillary filling pressure was used in a canine model in seven dogs to minimize the time period needed to achieve significant expansion. There were no complications, except one device malfunction, corrected by changes in design. The process was shown to be a safe and effective means of producing amounts of expansion similar to traditional methods in approximately 72 hours, with expansion of 28 percent (n = 6) for continuous tissue expansion (CTE) versus 34 percent (n = 6) for a 2-week rapid expansion protocol. This expansion was derived from either stretch of preexisting tissue (46 percent for CTE, 35 percent for 2-week expansion) or recruitment of adjacent tissue. The clinical application of continuous tissue expansion could permit the advantages of tissue expansion to be obtained in many more situations than are currently available to traditional tissue expansion techniques.     

Surface-area increase in tissue expansion

In this paper, the subject of surface-area gain in tissue expansion is approached from three sides. With the help of a mathematical approach, the theoretical increase in surface area was calculated in relation to the specifications of the expanders. In an in vitro model, these mathematical data were confirmed to be reliable. To determine the real surface-area gain that takes place in vivo, measurements on pigs were performed. It appears that only about 35 percent of the mathematically expected increase in surface area takes place. Moreover, a clear difference was observed between the surface-area gain for the different shapes of tissue expanders.     

A hemorrhagic hazard of tissue expansion

A case of delayed acute hemorrhage complicating tissue expansion of the scalp is presented. The likely mechanism was erosion of an occipital artery by the edge of the expander, and the risk of a similar occurrence should be considered in all patients undergoing tissue expansion.     

Animal models of human tissue expansion

Although tissue expansion is being used extensively in humans, many fundamental scientific questions remain to be addressed which can best be answered using an animal model. Presently, no single animal has been identified for research of this kind which is comparable both subjectively and objectively to humans. This study evaluates the skin of the rat, guinea pig, pig, and dog and identifies the dog as the best model based on biomechanical and practical considerations.     

Intraoperative tissue expansion in rhytidectomy revisited

Intraoperative tissue expansion is an adjunct that has been used during rhytidectomy to rejuvenate the face and neck. This technique has been thought to allow for additional skin resection and, thus, increased skin tightening during rhytidectomy. The stretch of the skin by expansion should allow for additional skin resection before closure. Also, when the force of the underlying expander is removed, the expanded skin would recoil and the advancement of the flap should become tighter, with improved results. The technique achieved some popularity a few years ago but has received little recent attention. In this study, the authors attempted to compare face-lift results of adjunctive intraoperative tissue expansion during rhytidectomy with similar techniques without intraoperative expansion. The results of 50 female patients who underwent rhytidectomy for midface rejuvenation by a single operating surgeon composed the study group. Twenty-five of the patients had undergone rhytidectomy that addressed the cheek, chin, and neck areas without expansion (nonexpanded rhytidectomy group). The other 25 patients (expanded rhytidectomy group) had adjunctive intraoperative tissue expansion performed with the rhytidectomy. A tissue expander was temporarily placed beneath the rhytidectomy flaps on each side and expanded in a standard manner before final skin resection and closure. Frontal and lateral photographs were evaluated by 54 examiners. Preoperative and postoperative photographs of the 50 patients were viewed side-by-side by the examiners. The patients were presented in blind fashion and random order. The examiners graded the results of each patient on a scale of improvement from 1 to 10, with 10 being the maximum level of improvement. The scores were recorded and statistically evaluated by using the two-sample test. Evaluation of the examiners' scores showed that the mean rating given to patients in the expanded rhytidectomy group was 5.07 (SD = 1.12). The mean rating for the nonexpanded rhytidectomy group was 5.27 (SD = 1.57). When the two groups were compared using the two-sample test, the difference between the two was not statistically significant (p = 0.6127). Intraoperative tissue expansion as an adjunct to rhytidectomy did not result in improved facial rejuvenation in this patient series. The authors' impression is that the benefits of tissue expansion do not justify the added expense, time, and risks associated with using tissue expansion during rhytidectomy.     

Objective monitoring for safe tissue expansion

The high incidence of complications during tissue expansion may be related to overexpansion with subsequent tissue necrosis and implant extrusion. Subjective parameters such as pain or capillary fill may be poor guidelines for determining the end point of a given session of expansion. In an attempt to rectify this problem, we have shown in a prospective study of eight consecutive patients that noninvasive objective monitoring utilizing transcutaneous measured oxygen levels, local perfusion, and implant pressures allowed us to quickly and safely expand each patient. Although perhaps cumbersome for routine use, this system proved valuable in complicated situations where subjective parameters could not be observed.     

Correction of cryptotia using tissue expansion

The anatomy and surgical correction of cryptotia are reviewed. Another technical procedure using retroauricular tissue expansion is presented. This method allows release of the auricle and construction of the auriculocephalic sulcus without the problems associated with older soft-tissue techniques, e.g., incomplete correction, multiple scars, poor color match of skin grafts, and donor-site morbidity.     

Breast reconstruction using modified tissue expansion

Inadequate chest-wall skin following mastectomy for carcinoma continues to be a problem in many breast reconstructions. To avoid extensive surgery, serial tissue expansion has been advocated. Since 1977, one of the authors has used a simple method of tissue expansion that we have termed "modified tissue expansion", defined as the creation of an adequate breast mound in one or two stages using a permanent prosthesis. Ninety percent of patients undergoing breast reconstruction between 1978 and 1983 were reconstructed using this method. A retrospective analysis of these 208 patients is presented. There were no mortalities, and only a 6.3 percent complication rate. Skin necroses related directly to the prosthesis occurred once, and there were no prosthetic deflations. Eighteen percent had first-step reconstruction only. The initial prosthesis averaged 400 cc in size. Selected Halsted radical mastectomy and postradiotherapy patients were successfully reconstructed. Seventy-eight percent felt their results were excellent at 1 year. Two percent were dissatisfied. Multiple office visits and the potential problems of serial expansion were avoided. Modified tissue expansion is a simple and viable method and should be considered among the options for breast reconstruction following mastectomy.     

Webbing of the neck: correction by tissue expansion

The surgical technique to correct the webbing deformity of the neck by Z-plasty corrects the deformity but leaves disfiguring scars over the lateral aspect of the neck, and the hair-bearing skin is transposed anteriorly. Butterfly correction and the lateral cervical advancement flap again correct the deformity and the low hairline but leave disfiguring scars over the posterior aspect of the neck. Recurrence is possible as a result of increased tension on the skin posteriorly. In the method described in this paper, the insufficient skin of the lateral aspect of the neck is expanded by tissue expanders. The excess skin is then advanced posteriorly, and redundant skin is excised following removal of the expanders. This corrects the webbing deformity and the low hairline, leaving a small vertical scar in the midline and a horizontal scar at the occipital area within the hairline.