Patients with aortic stenosis referred for TAVI: treatment decision, in-hospital outcome and determinants of survival

Aims

To assess treatment decision and outcome in patients referred for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) in addition to predictive factors of mortality after TAVI.

Methods

Three-centre prospective observational study including 358 patients. Endpoints were defined according to the Valve Academic Research Consortium.

Results

Of the 358 patients referred for TAVI, TAVI was performed in 235 patients (65%), surgical aortic valve replacement (AVR) in 24 (7%) and medical therapy (MT) in 99 (28%). Reasons to decline TAVI in favour of AVR/MT were patient preference (29%), peripheral vascular disease (15%) and non-severe aortic stenosis (11%). The logistic EuroSCORE was significantly higher in patients who underwent TAVI and MT in comparison with those undergoing AVR (19 vs. 10%, p = 0.007). At 30 days, all-cause mortality and the combined safety endpoint were 9 and 24% after TAVI and 8 and 25% after AVR, respectively. All-cause mortality was significantly lower in the TAVI group compared with the MT group at 6 months, 1 year and 2 years (12% vs. 22%, 21% vs. 33% and 31% vs. 55%, respectively, p < 0.001). Multivariable analysis revealed that blood transfusion (HR: 1.19; 95% CI: 1.05–1.33), pre-existing renal failure (HR: 1.18; 95% CI: 1.06–1.33) and STS score (HR: 1.06; 95% CI: 1.02–1.10) were independent predictors of mortality at a median of 10 (IQR: 3–23) months after TAVI.

Conclusions

Approximately two-thirds of the patients referred for TAVI receive this treatment with gratifying short- and long-term survival. Another 7% underwent AVR. Prognosis is poor in patients who do not receive valve replacement therapy.     

“First experience with JenaValve?: a single-centre cohort”

Aims

Since the introduction of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), newer generation and novel devices such as the retrievable JenaValve™ have been developed. We evaluated the procedural and 6-month results of our first experience with implantation of the JenaValve™.

Methods and results

From June 2012 to December 2013, 24 consecutive patients (mean age 80 ± 7 years, 42 % male) underwent an elective transapical TAVI with the JenaValve™. Device success was 88 %. The mortality rate was 4 % at 30 days and 31 % at 6 months. TAVI reduced the mean transvalvular gradient (44.2 ± 11.1 mmHg vs. 12.3 ± 4.3 mmHg, p < 0.001) and increased the mean aortic valve area (0.8 3 ± 0.23 to 1.70 ± 0.44 cm²). A mild paravalvular leakage (PVL) occurred in 4 patients (18 %) and a moderate PVL in 1 patient (4 %). Mean New York Heart Association Functional Class improved from 2.9 ± 0.5 to 2.0 ± 0.8 at 30 days.

Conclusion

TAVI using the JenaValve™ prosthesis seems adequate and safe in this first experience cohort.     

In vitro assessment of the influence of aortic annulus ovality on the hydrodynamic performance of self-expanding transcatheter heart valve prostheses

Background

Although CT-studies as well as intraoperative analyses have described broad anatomic variations of the aortic annulus, which is predominantly found non-circular, commercially available transcatheter aortic heart valve prostheses are circular. In this study, we hypothesize that the in vitro hydrodynamic function of a self-expanding transcatheter heart valve (Medtronic CoreValve^®) assessed in an oval compartment representing the aortic annulus will differ from the conventionally used circular compartment.

Methods

Medtronic CoreValve^® prostheses were tested in specifically designed and fabricated silicone compartments with three degrees of defined ovalities. The measurements were performed in a left heart simulator at three different flow rates. In this setting, regurgitation flow, effective orifice area, and systolic pressure gradient across the valve were determined. In addition, high speed video recordings were taken to investigate leaflet kinematics.

Results

The pressure difference across the prosthesis increased with rising ovality. The effective orifice areas were only slightly impacted. The analyses of the regurgitation showed minor changes and partially lower regurgitation when switching from round to slightly oval settings, followed by strong increases for further ovalization. The high speed videos show minor central leakage and impaired leaflet apposition for strong ovalities, but no leaflet/stentframe contact in any setting.

Conclusion

This study quantifies the influence of oval expansion of transcatheter heart valve prostheses on their hydrodynamic performance. While slight ovalities were well tolerated by a self-expanding prosthesis, more significant ovality led to worsening of prosthesis function and regurgitation.     

Ⅱ期心脏康复方案对心脏瓣膜置换术患者心肺功能、运动耐力及生活质量的影响

摘要 目的：观察Ⅱ期心脏康复方案对心脏瓣膜置换术患者心肺功能、运动耐力及生活质量的影响。方法：选择自2018年3月到2021年3月期间我院接收的120例心脏瓣膜置换术患者,根据随机数字表法将患者分为对照组（60例,围术期常规康复干预）和观察组（60例,在对照组基础上给予Ⅱ期心脏康复方案）。观察两组运动耐力、心肺功能及生活质量,记录两组随访期间心血管不良事件发生率。结果：干预2个月后,两组峰值摄氧量（VO₂peak）、无氧阈时摄氧量（VO₂at）、无氧阈时代谢当量（METat）、氧脉搏（O₂pulse）均升高,且观察组高于对照组（P<0.05）。干预2个月后,两组Fugl-Meyer运动量表（FMA）评分升高、6 min步行试验距离（6MWT）增加,且观察组高于对照组（P<0.05）。干预2个月后,两组总体健康（GH）、生命活力（VT）、躯体疼痛（BP）、社会功能（SF）、心理健康（MH）、生理职能（RP）、生理功能（PF）、情感职能（RE）评分均升高,且观察组较对照组高（P<0.05）。与对照组比较,观察组心血管不良事件发生率降低（P<0.05）。结论：Ⅱ期心脏康复方案应用于心脏瓣膜置换术患者,可改善心肺功能,提高运动耐力及生活质量,降低心血管不良事件发生率。     

The short and long term effects of exercise training in non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis – a randomised controlled trial

Background

Exercise training is recommended for non-cystic fibrosis (CF) bronchiectasis, but the long-term effects are unclear. This randomised controlled trial aimed to determine the effects of exercise training and review of airway clearance therapy (ACT) on exercise capacity, health related quality of life (HRQOL) and the incidence of acute exacerbations in people with non-CF bronchiectasis.

Methods

Participants were randomly allocated to 8 weeks of supervised exercise training and review of ACT, or control. Primary outcomes of exercise capacity and HRQOL (Chronic respiratory disease questionnaire) and secondary outcomes of cough-related QOL (Leicester cough questionnaire) and psychological symptoms (Hospital anxiety and depression scale) were measured at baseline, following completion of the intervention period and at 6 and 12 months follow up. Secondary outcomes of the exacerbation rate and time to first exacerbation were analysed over 12 months.

Results

Eighty-five participants (mean FEV₁ 74% predicted; median Modified Medical Research Council Dyspnoea grade of 1 (IQR [1–3]) were included. Exercise training increased the incremental shuttle walk distance (mean difference to control 62 m, 95% CI 24 to 101 m) and the 6-minute walking distance (mean difference to control 41 m, 95% CI 19 to 63 m), but these improvements were not sustained at 6 or 12 months. Exercise training reduced dyspnoea (p = 0.009) and fatigue (p = 0.01) but did not impact on cough-related QOL or mood. Exercise training reduced the frequency of acute exacerbations (median 1[IQR 1–3]) compared to the control group (2[1–3]) over 12 months follow up (p = 0.012), with a longer time to first exacerbation with exercise training of 8 months (95% CI 7 to 9 months) compared to the control group (6 months [95% CI 5 to 7 months], p = 0.047).

Conclusions

Exercise training in bronchiectasis is associated with short term improvement in exercise capacity, dyspnoea and fatigue and fewer exacerbations over 12 months.

Trial registry

ClinicalTrials.gov ({\"type\":\"clinical-trial\",\"attrs\":{\"text\":\"NCT00885521\",\"term_id\":\"NCT00885521\"}}NCT00885521).     

Low intensity,long-term outpatient rehabilitation in COPD: a randomised controlled trial

Background

Most pulmonary rehabilitation programmes currently involve 2–3 sessions per week as recommended by international guidelines. We aimed to investigate whether relevant improvements in physical capabilities and quality of life in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) could be achieved by a long-term, low intensity, once weekly rehabilitation programme using limited resources.

Methods

100 patients with moderate to severe COPD were randomised to a continuous outpatient interdisciplinary rehabilitation programme or standard care. Physiotherapy-led supervised outpatient training sessions were performed once weekly in addition to educational elements. Outcome measures at baseline and after 26 weeks were 6-minute-walk-test, cycle ergometry, and health-related quality of life.

Results

37 patients in the training group and 44 patients in the control group completed the study. After 26 weeks there were clinically significant differences between the groups for 6 minute-walk-distance (+59 m, 95% CI 28–89 m), maximum work load (+7.4 Watt, 95% CI 0.5-13.4 Watt) and St. George’s Respiratory Questionnaire score (−5 points, 95% CI −10 to −1 points). Total staff costs of the programme per participant were ≤ €625.

Conclusion

Clinically meaningful improvements in physical capabilities and health-related quality of life may be achieved using long-term pulmonary rehabilitation programmes of lower intensity than currently recommended. Trial registration: clinicaltrials.gov {"type":"clinical-trial","attrs":{"text":"NCT01195402","term_id":"NCT01195402"}}NCT01195402.     

The effect of aortic valve replacement on quality of life in symptomatic patients with severe aortic stenosis

Background

Although symptomatic patients with severe aortic stenosis have a high disease burden and guidelines recommend aortic valve replacement, many are treated conservatively. This study describes to what extent quality of life is changed by aortic valve replacement relative to conservative treatment.

Methods

This observational study followed 132 symptomatic patients with severe aortic stenosis who were subjected to an SF-36v2TM Health Survey.

Results

At baseline 84 patients were treated conservatively, 48 were referred for aortic valve replacement. In the conservatively treated group 15 patients died during a mean follow-up of 18 months (Kaplan-Meier survival was 85 % and 72 % at one and 2 years respectively) and 22 patients crossed over to the surgical group. Of the resulting 70 patients in the surgical group 3 patients died during a mean follow-up of 11 months (survival 95 % at 1 year). Physical functioning, vitality and general health improved significantly 1 year after aortic valve replacement. In conservatively treated patients physical quality of life deteriorated over time while general health, vitality and social functioning showed a declining trend. Mental health remained stable in both groups.

Conclusions

Aortic valve replacement improves physical quality of life, general health and vitality in patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis. Besides having a low life expectancy, conservatively treated patients experience deterioration of physical quality of life. Health surveys such as the SF-36v2TM can be valuable tools in monitoring the burden of disease for an individual patient and offer additional help in treatment decisions.     

Surgical aortic valve replacement in patients older than 75 years: is there really a quality of life benefit?

BackgroundTo evaluate the results of elective isolated surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) on quality of life (QoL) in patients > 75 years.Methods138 patients operated between January 2008 and December 2011 were included. The EuroQOL questionnaire (EQ-5D, EQ-VAS) was completed preoperatively, and 1- and 2-years postoperatively. The logistic EuroSCORE was used for risk stratification, the Corpus Christi Heart project criteria to assess physical activity.ResultsMean age was 79.5 ± 2.8 years, mean risk 9.7 ± 5.4, hospital mortality 2.8 %. For 115 patients (83.3 %) the preoperative QoL information was complete. Fifty patients were classified as sedentary. In the first postoperative year 13 patients died, mostly sedentary patients (p = 0.046) with a low EQ-5D (p = 0.017). There was no QoL information on 32 survivors, mostly sedentary patients (p = 0.001). The 70 patients with QoL information showed an increased QoL (NS). Two years postoperatively, 16 patients died, significantly more sedentary patients (p = 0.015) with a low EQ-5D (p = 0.006). For 42 survivors, there was no QoL information; these were mostly sedentary patients (p = 0.021). The 57 patients with 2-year QoL information had an increased EQ-5D (NS) and EQ-VAS (p = 0.024).ConclusionsQoL increases after SAVR. However, the patients lost to follow-up were mostly sedentary or had a low preoperative QoL, which can lead to biased results.