Female flowers and systematic position of Picrodendraceae (Euphorbiaceae s.l., Malpighiales)

This is the first comparative study of floral structure of the recently established new family Picrodendraceae (part of Euphorbiaceae s.l.) in Malpighiales. Nine species of eight (out of ca. 28) genera were studied. Female flowers are mainly completely trimerous, and in such flowers the perianth consists of one or two whorls of sepals. A floral disc (which probably functions as a nectary) is mostly present. The free parts of the carpels are simple (unbranched) in all ten species studied. Each carpel contains two crassinucellar, anatropous or hemitropous, epitropous (antitropous) ovules, which are covered by a large obturator. The inner integument is thicker than the outer (equally thick in two species studied), and commonly both integuments form the micropyle. In mature ovules the vascular bundle commonly branches in the chalaza, with the branches extending to the base of the inner integument but not entering it. A nucellar cap and, less often, a nucellar beak is formed. Floral structure supports the close relationship of Picrodendraceae with Phyllanthaceae and Euphorbiaceae s.str. within Malpighiales, as suggested (but not yet strongly supported) by some recent published molecular analyses. These three families share a unique combination of characters, including (1) unisexual, apetalous trimerous flowers, (2) crassinucellar ovules with a nucellar beak, (3) a large obturator, and (4) explosive fruits with carunculate seeds.     

Floral ontogeny and systematic position of the Didiereaceae

Floral ontogenetical data from all four genera of the Didiereaceae (s.str.) are presented for the first time. All Didiereaceae s.str. are dioecious, having unisexual flowers with organ rudiments of the opposite sex. Two median bracts followed by a tetramerous perianth (two alternating dimerous ``whorls'), a slightly complex androecium with 6–12 stamens in a single row (on a common ring primordium), four of which mostly alternating with the perianth members, and one basal ovule connecting three free septa at their very base are flower characters in Didiereaceae, supporting phylogenetic analyses based on nucleotide sequence data. Closest relatives are the (formerly) portulacaceous genera Portulacaria (5 stamens alternating with the perianth), Ceraria (5 stamens alternating with the perianth), and Calyptrotheca (many stamens), all with pentamerous perianths, from which the tetramerous perianth in Didiereaceae can be derived. Applequist and Wallace (2003) included these three genera in an expanded family Didiereaceae (with three subfamilies).     

Floral Ontogeny in Bourreria (Ehretiaceae, Boraginales)

Gynoecium and fruit ontogeny is studied in eight species of Bourreria (Ehretiaceae, Boraginales). The internal architecture of the bicarpellate ovary results from the development of several secondary septs, i.e., apical, basal, and false septs. Flower and fruit morphology provide additional characters for phylogenetic analyses. Apomorphies of monophyletic Bourreria are the valvate calyx lobes, an extensive disc, and an additional sterile chamber in each endocarpid (i.e., fruit part). The development of transfer cells and endosperm haustoria confirm the systematic placement of Bourreria in the Primarily Woody Boraginales (i.e., Heliotropiaceae, Cordiaceae, and Ehretiaceae including Lennoaceae). However, the precise systematic position of Bourreria within Ehretiaceae cannot be resolved on the basis of the morphological data provided here.     

Ontogeny and morphology of the fertile flowers of Hydrangea and allied genera of tribe Hydrangeeae (Hydrangeaceae)

The monophyletic Hydrangeeae (Hydrangeaceae) consists of the clade Cardiandra + Deinanthe and its sister, the Hydrangea clade, which includes the paraphyletic Hydrangea as well as Broussaisia, Decumaria, Dichroa, Pileostegia, Platycrater and Schizophragma. The plesiomorphic imbricate corolla aestivation and polystemony of Cardiandra and Deinanthe distinguish these two genera from most members of the Hydrangea clade. Deinanthe has postgenitally fused styles and cushion-like, dorsally positioned stigmas. The Hydrangea clade is notable because most species of Hydrangea share a floral morphology characterized by small size; tetramerous-pentamerous perianths; inconspicuous sepals; reflexed petals; diplostemony; stamens that are longer than the styles; completely inferior ovaries; separate styles; terminal, papillate stigmas; and dimerous-tetramerous gynoecia. This suite of states is termed the 'Hydrangea floral syndrome' (HFS). Various members of the Hydrangea clade lack the HFS, including (1) Platycrater; (2) Hydrangea anomala; (3) H. paniculata + H. heteromalla; (4) the Schizophragma clade (Schizophragma, Pileostegia and Decumaria); and (5) the macrophylla clade (H. macrophylla, H. scandens, H. hirta, Dichroa and Broussaisia). The meristic uniqueness of Decumaria reflects mutations observed in Arabidopsis (clavata) and Lycopersicon (fasciated) that cause organ number increases because of changes in meristem capital. The modification of early perianth development to form a prominent corolline torus at a point when sepals are diminutive is present in H. anomala and Hydrangea section Cornidia and may be synapomorphic for them. Various transformations in the perianth, androecium, and gynoecium lie behind the floral diversity of Hydrangeeae. Some morphological transformations have been homoplastic, including shifts to polystemony, calyptrate corollas, and synstyly.     

Evolution of perianth and stamen characteristics with respect to floral symmetry in Ranunculales

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Floral symmetry presents two main states in angiosperms, namely polysymmetry and monosymmetry. Monosymmetry is thought to have evolved several times independently from polysymmetry, possibly in co-adaptation with specialized pollinators. Monosymmetry commonly refers to the perianth, even though associated androecium modifications have been reported. The evolution of perianth symmetry is examined with respect to traits of flower architecture in the Ranunculales, the sister group to all other eudicots, which present a large diversity of floral forms. METHODS: Characters considered were perianth merism, calyx, corolla and androecium symmetry, number of stamens and spurs. Character evolution was optimized on a composite phylogenetic tree of Ranunculales using maximum parsimony. KEY RESULTS: The ancestral state for merism could not be inferred because the basalmost Eupteleaceae lack a perianth and have a variable number of stamens. The Papaveraceae are dimerous, and the five other families share a common trimerous ancestor. Shifts from trimery to dimery (or reverse) are observed. Pentamery evolved in Ranunculaceae. Ranunculales except Eupteleaceae, present a polysymmetric ancestral state. Monosymmetry evolved once within Papaveraceae, Ranunculaceae and Menispermaceae (female flowers only). Oligandry is the ancestral state for all Ranunculales, and polyandry evolved several times independently, in Papaveraceae, Menispermaceae, Berberidaceae and Ranunculaceae, with two reversions to oligandry in the latter. The ancestral state for androecium symmetry is ambiguous for the Ranunculales, while polysymmetry evolved immediately after the divergence of Eupteleaceae. A disymmetric androecium evolved in Papaveraceae. The ancestral state for spurs is none. Multiple spurs evolved in Papaveraceae, Berberidaceae and Ranunculaceae, and single spurs occur in Papaveraceae and Ranunculaceae. CONCLUSIONS: The evolution of symmetry appears disconnected from changes in merism and stamen number, although monosymmetry never evolved in the context of an open ground plan. In bisexual species, monosymmetry evolved coincidently with single spurs, allowing us to propose an evolutionary scenario for Papaveraceae.     

Gynoecium and perianth inZanthoxylum s.l. (Rutaceae)

The question whether the uniseriate perianth ofZanthoxylum L. s. str. is homologous with the calyx or the corolla of taxa included inFagara, or of an independent origin, has been controversial for a long time, but the arguments mostly have remained theoretical. The present investigation of floral structures indicates that there are two different types of uniseriate perianth inZanthoxylum s. str. Therefore, this taxon does not represent a natural group and should be united withFagara asZanthoxylum s.l. The infrageneric taxonomy of this genus is still very ambiguous. It is shown that differences in indumentum, number of sepals and petals (5-4-3) resp. perianth segments (4–9), stamens (3–6), and free carpels (1–5) are of systematic relevance. Particularly important but so far neglected is carpel shape, where an acrostylous and an anacrostylous-basistylous type can be recognized. Stigmata of 2 or more carpels mostly fuse to form a compitum. 4–5-merous flowers with calyx and corolla, and acrostylous carpels are considered as plesiomorphic character states in the genus. On the basis of ± corresponding morphological and phytochemical progressions a working hypothesis about the relationships withinZanthoxylum s.l. is presented in graphical form (Fig. 9).Adapted from a lecture held at the 10th Symposion on Morphology, Anatomy, and Systematics in Göttingen, February 1991.