Treatment with antidepressants and histamine receptor mediated 3H-cyclic AMP formation in guinea pig cortex

It has been recently reported that most of the antidepressant drugs block histamine H1 and H2 receptors in the brain under in vitro conditions and it has been suggested that this may be related in part to their therapeutic effect. Since the in vitro and in vivo effects of these drugs may differ, we studied the effect of treatment with antidepressant drugs on histamine receptor sensitivity in the guinea pig brain and observed that chronic treatment with tricyclic antidepressants or phenelzine (an MAO inhibitor) causes a reduction in histamine receptor sensitivity. This reduction is probably mediated through two different mechanisms, since only tricyclic antidepressants cause a reduction after acute treatment. Although some of the side effects of antidepressant treatment may be related to the blockade of histamine receptors, these results do not support the assumption that this effect of antidepressant treatment contributes to their clinical effects.     

Effects of antidepressant drugs on histamine-H1 receptors in the brain

The histamine-H1 receptor blocking properties of a number of structurally different antidepressant drugs have been evaluated using a 3H-mepyramine binding assay and a guinea-pig ileum preparation. The tricyclic antidepressants all inhibited the histamine-H1 receptor. Some newer antidepressant drugs, such as zimelidine and nomifensine were devoid of activity while others, such as iprindole and mianserin were very potent. It is concluded that antagonistic effects on the histamine-H1 receptor is not associated with the therapeutic efficacy in depression, but may contribute to the sedative effects of the antidepressant drugs.     

Trazodone - a new antidepressant

Trazodone is a new antidepressant of current interest with a chemical structure unrelated to other available antidepressant agents. Both animal and human biopharmacological studies indicate a profile of activity which is not typical of either tricyclic or MAOI antidepressants.Although trazodone blocks the re-uptake of 5-HT into serotoninergic neurones it is also a potent central antagonist of 5-HT. Recent studies have shown that trazodone reduces the sensitivity of central β-adrenoreceptors by an as yet undefined mechanism. However, the relationship between the known pharmacology of trazodone and its clinical activity remains unclear.Clinical data on various depressive states show that trazodone has an activity equivalent in potency to available medication. Trazodone is well absorbed and high blood concentrations occur within 1 – 2 hours. The quality of side effects and adverse reactions reported by various authors confirm that it is a comparatively safe drug in use. In particular it lacks both anticholinergic activity and adverse cardiotoxic effects.     

Antidepressant-induced ubiquitination and degradation of the cardiac potassium channel hERG

The most common cause for adverse cardiac events by antidepressants is acquired long QT syndrome (acLQTS), which produces electrocardiographic abnormalities that have been associated with syncope, torsade de pointes arrhythmias, and sudden cardiac death. acLQTS is often caused by direct block of the cardiac potassium current I(Kr)/hERG, which is crucial for terminal repolarization in human heart. Importantly, desipramine belongs to a group of tricyclic antidepressant compounds that can simultaneously block hERG and inhibit its surface expression. Although up to 40% of all hERG blockers exert combined hERG block and trafficking inhibition, few of these compounds have been fully characterized at the cellular level. Here, we have studied in detail how desipramine inhibits hERG surface expression. We find a previously unrecognized combination of two entirely different mechanisms; desipramine increases hERG endocytosis and degradation as a consequence of drug-induced channel ubiquitination and simultaneously inhibits hERG forward trafficking from the endoplasmic reticulum. This unique combination of cellular effects in conjunction with acute channel block may explain why tricyclic antidepressants as a compound class are notorious for their association with arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death. Taken together, we describe the first example of drug-induced channel ubiquitination and degradation. Our data are directly relevant to the cardiac safety of not only tricyclic antidepressants but also other therapeutic compounds that exert multiple effects on hERG, as hERG trafficking and degradation phenotypes may go undetected in most preclinical safety assays designed to screen for acLQTS.     

Controlled trial of trimipramine,monoamine oxidase inhibitors,and combined treatment in depressed outpatients.

A study was carried out in which 135 mildly or moderately depressed outpatients were randomly allocated to one of five groups receiving six weeks'' treatment weith antidepressant drugs. The groups received a tricyclic antidepressant (trimipramine; mean dose 106 mg at night) or a monoamine oxidase inhibitor (MAOI) (phenelzine or isocarboxazid; mean doses 45 and 32 mg/day respectively), or a combination of the two (phenelzine plus trimipramine or isocarboxazid plus trimipramine). Various scales were used to measure depression before and at one, three, and six weeks of treatment, and results were assessed blindly. The tricyclic antidepressant was found to be consistently superior to the MAOIs and the combined treatments. Some differential indicators of response to the various antidepressants were found--for example, patients with initial complaints of dizziness, suicidal ideas, irritability, and insomnia and a longer duration of illness were more likely to respond to trimipramine--but these were of only modest significance. Side effects were not troublesome in any group. It is concluded that neither MAOIs nor MAOIs combined with tricyclic antidepressants are the treatment of first choice in unselected outpatients with mild or moderate depression.     

The inhibition of GLUT1 glucose transport and cytochalasin B binding activity by tricyclic antidepressants

Under normal metabolic conditions glucose is an important energy source for the mammalian brain. Positron Emission Tomography studies of the central nervous system have demonstrated that tricyclic antidepressant medications alter cerebral metabolic function. The mode by which these drugs perturb metabolism is unknown. In the present study the interactions of tricyclic antidepressants with the GLUT1 glucose transport protein is examined. Amitriptyline, nortriptyline, desipramine, and imipramine all inhibit the influx of 3-O-methyl glucose into resealed erythrocytes. This inhibition is observed with drug concentrations in the millimolar range. All four antidepressants also noncompetitively displace cytochalasin B binding to GLUT1. The K(I) for this displacement ranges from 0.56 to 1.43 millimolar. This value is in a range greater than that associated with clinical doses and this effect may not be directly applicable to side effects observed with normal use. The observed interaction of these drugs with GLUT1 may reflect an affinity for other glucose-transport or glucose-binding proteins, and may possibly contribute to tricyclic antidepressant toxicity.     

General practitioners' perceptions of the tolerability of antidepressant drugs: a comparison of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and tricyclic antidepressants.

OBJECTIVE: To examine inceptions and discontinuations of antidepressants in general practice. DESIGN: An observational study analysing data from an ongoing cross sectional postal survey. Every three months a representative sample of 250 doctors recorded prescribing activity for four weeks. This provided 4000 general practitioner weeks of recording per year. SETTING: A representative panel of general practitioners in England, Wales, and Scotland. SUBJECTS: Patients who began a new course of an antidepressant or had their treatment stopped or changed by the general practitioner between 1 July 1990 and 30 June 1995. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Numbers of patients prescribed a new course of antidepressant; numbers discontinuing treatment; the ratio of antidepressant discontinuations to antidepressant inceptions; reasons for discontinuation; proportion of switches to another antidepressant. RESULTS: There were 13,619 inceptions and 3934 discontinuations of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and tricyclic antidepressants during the study. The number of newly prescribed courses of antidepressants increased by 116%, mostly due to an increase in prescribing of serotonin reuptake inhibitors. The ratio of total discontinuations to inceptions was significantly lower for serotonin reuptake inhibitors (22%) than for tricyclic antidepressants (33%). Differences persisted when controlled for age and sex of patients and severity of depression. However, there was more switching away from selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors when they failed (72%) than from tricyclic antidepressants (58%). CONCLUSIONS: Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors are less likely than tricyclic antidepressants to be discontinued. A prospective study is needed in general practice to assess the implications of differences in discontinuation rates and switches on clinical and economic outcomes.     

High-affinity binding of 3H-imipramine in brain and platelets and its relevance to the biochemistry of affective disorders

Specific high-affinity binding of ³H-imipramine has been demonstrated in the brain of various species including man. These binding sites have many of the characteristics to be expected for a pharmacological receptor and appear to be associated with the neuronal uptake mechanism for serotonin. Different antidepressant treatments like chronic administration of tricyclic antidepressants, chronic electroshock or sleep-deprivation result in decreases in the density of ³H-imipramine binding sites in normal animals. ³H-imipramine binding sites have also been found in blood platelets from different species including man. These sites are identical to those described in the brain. Clinical studies have shown that untreated severely depressed patients have a lower density of ³H-imipramine binding sites in their platelets when compared with control volunteers of the same age and sex. Longitudinal studies indicate that the low density of ³H-imipramine binding sites does not change during treatment with tricyclic antidepressant drugs and the subsequent clinical recovery from depression. ³H-imipramine binding in brain and platelets is proposed as a useful research tool in biochemical and clinical studies in affective disorders.     

Childhood and adolescent depression: why do children and adults respond differently to antidepressant drugs?

Childhood and adolescent depression is an increasingly problematic diagnosis for young people due to a lack of effective treatments for this age group. The symptoms of adult depression can be treated effectively with multiple classes of antidepressant drugs which have been developed over the years using animal and human studies. But many of the antidepressants used to treat adult depression cannot be used for pediatric depression because of a lack of efficacy and/or side effects. The reason that children and adolescents respond differently to antidepressant treatment than adults is poorly understood. In order to better understand the etiology of pediatric depression and treatments that are effective for this age group, the differences between adults, children and adolescents needed to be elucidated. Much of the understanding of adult depression has come from studies using adult animals, therefore studies using juvenile animals would likely help us to better understand childhood and adolescent depression. Recent studies have shown both neurochemical and behavioral differences between adult and juvenile animals after antidepressant treatment. Juvenile animals have differences compared to adult animals in the maturation of the serotonergic and noradrenergic systems, and in dose of antidepressant drug needed to achieve similar brain levels. Differences after administration of antidepressant drug have also been reported for adrenergic receptor regulation, a physiologic hypothermic response, as well as behavioral differences in two animal models of depression. The differences between adults and juveniles not only in the human response to antidepressants but also with animals studies warrant a specific distinction between the study of pediatric and adult depression and the manner in which new treatments are pursued.     

Drugs That Cause Weight Gain

Among drugs which cause weight gain, the tricyclic antidepressant medications are a drug class producing persistent and problematic body weight gain in many treated patients. Major depressive illness is often associated with reductions in appetite and body weight, and treatment with antidepressants effectively restores mood, appetite and weight. However, a frequent complaint of patients treated with tricyclic drugs is of excessive and unwanted weight gain, oftentimes resulting in medication noncompliance. The incidence of weight gain during acute and chronic treatment with different, frequently prescribed antidepressant drugs will be reviewed, as will the possible mechanisms by which such drugs alter caloric intake and expenditure, contributing to drug-induced weight gain.     

Recent Advances in Antidepressant Drug Treatment

Psychiatric research has made remarkable advances in understanding the pathophysiology of depressive illnesses. Biologic depressions are now understood as neurotransmitter deficiency diseases. Certain forms of depression are treated with tricyclic antidepressant drugs, which increase the amount of available neurotransmitters. Complicating the clinical picture, however, is the problem of wide variability of levels of tricyclic drugs in the plasma of persons receiving the same dosage. Another problem is the apparent linear dose-response relationship of imipramine hydrochloride and its sister compound desipramine hydrochloride while amitriptyline and nortriptyline follow an inverted U-shaped dose-response curve. However, with newer, more sophisticated diagnostic methods, combined with monitoring of tricyclic drug levels in plasma, therapeutic efficacy can approach 90 percent.Available neurotransmitters also can be increased using monoamine oxidase (MAO) inhibitors. Although MAO inhibitors have been less popular than the tricyclic drugs, recent clinical research tends to support their efficacy. Distinct individual differences in the rate of metabolism of MAO inhibitors have been found. New methods are being devised to detect these differences and monitor directly the effects of these drugs. One of these methods, platelet MAO inhibition, shows some clinical promise.Tricyclic drugs and MAO inhibitors have recently been joined by lithium carbonate, which shows notable efficacy in removing acute manic-depressive symptoms as well as preventing their return during maintenance treatment. Its utility in treating cyclic depressions without mania is now being explored by researchers.     

Inhibition of acetylcholinesterase from Electrophorus electricus (L.) by tricyclic antidepressants

The effects of tricyclic antidepressants drugs (TCA) amitriptyline, imipramine and nortriptyline, on purified Electrophorus electricus (L.) acetylcholinesterase (AChE; acetylcholine hydrolase, EC 3.1.1.7) were studied using kinetic methods and specific fluorescent probe propidium. The antidepressants inhibited AChE activity by a non-competitive mechanism. Inhibition constants range from 200 to 400 microM. Dimethylated amitriptyline and imipramine were more potent inhibitors than the monomethylated nortriptyline. Fluorescence measurements using bis-quaternary ligand propidium were used to monitor ligand-binding properties of these cationic antidepressants to the AChE peripheral anionic site (PAS). This ligand exhibited an eight-fold fluorescence enhancement upon binding to the peripheral anionic site of AChE from E. electricus (L.) with K(D)=7 x 10(-7)M. It was observed that TCA drugs displaced propidium from the enzyme. On the basis of the displacement experiments antidepressant dissociation constants were determined. Similar values for the inhibition constants suggest that these drugs have similar affinity to the peripheral anionic site. The results also indicate that the catalytic active center of AChE does not participate in the interaction of enzyme with tricyclic antidepressants. These studies suggest that the binding site for tricyclic antidepressants is located at the peripheral anionic site of E. electricus (L.) acetylcholinesterase.     

G protein signaling and the molecular basis of antidepressant action

Over the past four decades, a variety of interventions have been used for the treatment of clinical depression and other affective disorders. Several distinct pharmacological compounds show therapeutic efficacy. There are three major classes of antidepressant drugs: monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs), selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), and tricyclic compounds. There are also a variety of atypical antidepressant drugs, which defy ready classification. Finally, there is electroconvulsive therapy, ECT. All require chronic (2-3 weeks) treatment to achieve a clinical response. To date, no truly inclusive hypothesis concerning a mechanism of action for these diverse therapies has been formed. This review is intended to give an overview of research concerning G protein signaling and the molecular basis of antidepressant action. In it, the authors attempt to discuss progress that has been made in this arena as well as the possibility that some point (or points) along a G protein signaling cascade represent a molecular target for antidepressant therapy that might lead toward a unifying hypothesis for depression. This review is not designed to address the clinical studies. Furthermore, as it is a relatively short paper, citations to the literature are necessarily selective. The authors apologize in advance to authors whose work we have failed to cite.     

Antidepressant drugs in the elderly: Are the indications as long term as the treatment?

In a community study of 761 people aged 70 years and over 45 (5·9%) were found to be taking long term tricyclic antidepressants. Forty four were compared with matched controls. There was no evidence that tricyclic antidepressants were being used to compensate for poor physical health or function. Twenty subjects had a clear history of depression; three of these required additional treatment and five might have coped without continued drug treatment. Twelve of the remainder had started treatment with tricyclic antidepressants as hypnotics and 11 as a trial because of suspected depression. They had continued taking the drugs over a long period.Regular review of both the adequacy of and the necessity for continued treatment with tricyclic antidepressants in the elderly is recommended.     

Antidepressants Cause Bradycardia and Heart Block in GD 13 Rat Embryos In Vitro

This study investigated the effects of a range of antidepressant drugs on the heart of gestation day 13 rat embryos in vitro. The general hypothesis was that the drugs would adversely affect the function of the embryonic heart since they all have some cardiac ion channel blocking activity in addition to their main pharmacological effect on neurotransmitters. The results showed that all the tested drugs caused bradycardia in a generally concentration‐dependent manner. At higher concentrations most of the drugs caused some degree of heart block consistent with sodium channel blockade and some drugs also showed negative inotropy associated with blockade of the L‐type calcium channel. One drug, trazodone, caused arrhythmia consistent with blockade of the hERG (human ether‐a‐go‐go related gene) potassium channel. In general the effects on the embryonic rat heart were only seen at “free drug” concentrations much greater than those likely to occur in pregnant women taking antidepressant medication. The least margin of safety was seen with the tricyclic antidepressants and the serotonin antagonist and reuptake inhibitor trazodone.     

Mechanisms of action of antidepressants: from neurotransmitter systems to signaling pathways

Antidepressants are commonly used in the treatment of anxiety and depression, medical conditions that affect approximately 17-20% of the population. The clinical effects of antidepressants take several weeks to manifest, suggesting that these drugs induce adaptive changes in brain structures affected by anxiety and depression. In order to develop shorter-acting and more effective drugs for the treatment of anxiety and depression, it is important to understand how antidepressants bring about their beneficial effects. Recent reports suggest that antidepressants can induce neurogenesis in the adult brain, although the mechanisms involved are not clearly understood. In this review, we describe the different neurotransmitter systems that are affected by anxiety and depression and how they are modulated by antidepressant treatment with a focus on signaling molecules and pathways that are activated during neurotransmitter receptor induced neurogenesis.     

Relationship between Plasma Level and Therapeutic Effect of Nortriptyline

The relationship between plasma concentration of nortriptyline and therapeutic effect after two weeks'' treatment with the drug was investigated in 29 psychiatric inpatients. Endogenous depression was diagnosed in all patients. Amelioration of depressive symptoms was estimated as reduction in score on a rating scale, based on a psychiatric interview. Amelioration was not correlated to the patient''s sex or age. There was a curved relationship between plasma level of nortriptyline and therapeutic effect. Amelioration was most pronounced in the intermediate plasma level range (50-139 ng nortriptyline/ml plasma) and was slight both at lower and at higher plasma levels. This type of relationship may be due to the dual action of tricyclic antidepressants which has been found in animal experiments. On larger dosages a phenothiazine-like blockade of the monoaminergic receptor is added to the blockade of monoamine reuptake thought to be related to the antidepressant action of the drugs.This study thus suggests two possible reasons for a therapeutic failure with nortriptyline: a too low or a too high plasma level. The large individual variation in the pharmacokinetics of the tricyclic antidepressants makes prediction of plasma level from dosage in a given individual virtually impossible without knowledge of rate of elimination and apparent volume of distribution. Hence monitoring plasma levels may be a way to increase the efficacy of treatment with these drugs.     

A Pharmacovigilance Approach for Post-Marketing in Japan Using the Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report (JADER) Database and Association Analysis

BackgroundRapid dissemination of information regarding adverse drug reactions is a key aspect for improving pharmacovigilance. There is a possibility that unknown adverse drug reactions will become apparent through post-marketing administration. Currently, although there have been studies evaluating the relationships between a drug and adverse drug reactions using the JADER database which collects reported spontaneous adverse drug reactions, an efficient approach to assess the association between adverse drug reactions of drugs with the same indications as well as the influence of demographics (e.g. gender) has not been proposed.ConclusionsDifferent combinations of adverse drug reactions were noted between the antidepressants. In addition, the reported adverse drug reactions differed by gender. This approach using a large database for examining the associations can improve safety monitoring during the post-marketing phase.     

Drug Withdrawal Syndromes: A Literature Review

Drug withdrawal syndromes reportedly have been caused by numerous pharmacological agents, but only a few drugs have been adequately studied in this regard. Criteria for evaluating drug withdrawal syndromes have been proposed. Sedative-hypnotic agents, opiates, corticosteroids, clonidine, tricyclic antidepressant medications and beta-adrenergic blocking agents meet the criteria for such syndromes. Gradual tapering of the dose of these drugs is recommended when therapy must be discontinued. Whether or not other drugs cause rebound reactions is questionable, but caution should be used when discontinuing drugs for which numerous reports of withdrawal syndromes exist.