A meta-analysis of the relationship between glutathione S-transferase T1 null/presence gene polymorphism and the risk of lung cancer including 31802 subjects

The relationship between glutathione S-transferase T1 (GSTT1) null/presence gene polymorphism and the risk of lung cancer from the published reports are still conflicting. This study was conducted to evaluate the relationship between GSTT1 null/presence gene polymorphism and the risk of lung cancer using meta-analysis method. The association studies were identified from PubMed, and Cochrane Library on July 1, 2012, and eligible investigations were included and synthesized using meta-analysis method. 51 reports were recruited into this meta-analysis for the association of null genotype of GSTT1 with lung cancer susceptibility, consisting of 15,140 patients with lung cancer and 16,662 controls. There was a marked association between GSTT1 null genotype and lung cancer risk in overall populations (OR = 1.15, 95 % CI 1.04–1.27, P = 0.007). Furthermore, GSTT1 null genotype was associated with the lung cancer risk in Asians (OR = 1.47, 95 % CI 1.23–1.76, P < 0.0001). However, GSTT1 null genotype was not associated with the risk of lung cancer in Caucasians, Brazilian population and Africans. In conclusion, GSTT1 null genotype is associated with the lung cancer in overall populations and in Asians.     

Significant association of glutathione S-transferase T1 null genotype with esophageal cancer risk: a meta-analysis

Recent studies on the association between glutathione S-transferase T1 (GSTT1) polymorphism and risk of esophageal cancer showed inconclusive results. To clarify this possible association, we conducted a meta-analysis of published studies. Data were collected from the following electronic databases: Pubmed, Embase, and Chinese Biomedical Database (CBM). The odds ratio (OR) and its 95 % confidence interval (95 % CI) was used to assess the strength of this association. We summarized the data on the association between GSTT1 null genotype and risk of esophageal cancer in the overall population, and performed subgroup analyses by ethnicity. Finally, a total of 24 independent studies including a total of 7,801 subjects (2,965 cases and 4,836 controls) were eligible for meta-analysis. In the overall analysis, there was no significant association between GSTT1 null genotype and esophageal cancer risk (OR = 1.15, 95 % CI 0.99–1.33, P = 0.067). However, meta-analysis of adjusted ORs showed a significant association between GSTT1 null genotype and increased risk of esophageal cancer (OR = 1.30, 95 % CI 1.08–1.56, P = 0.005). Subgroup analyses by ethnicity showed there was an obvious association between GSTT1 null genotype and increased risk of esophageal cancer in East Asians (OR = 1.24, 95 % CI 1.10–1.39, P < 0.001), but not in Caucasians (OR = 0.89, 95 % CI 0.71–1.11, P = 0.300). There was no obvious risk of publication bias in this meta-analysis (Egger’s test, P = 0.784). This meta-analysis demonstrates that GSTT1 null genotype is independently associated with increased risk of esophageal cancer, and a race-specific effect may exist in this association.     

Significant association between GSTT1 null genotype and risk of asthma during childhood in Caucasians

Asthma is a complex multifactorial disorder and its management requires a better understanding of its various pathogenesis and mechanisms. Previous studies assessing the association between glutathione S-transferase T1 (GSTT1) null genotype and asthma risk during childhood reported conflicting results. To get a more precise estimation of the association between GSTT1 null genotype and risk of asthma during childhood, we performed a meta-analysis of 16 studies with a total of 18,558 subjects. Subgroup analyses were performed by ethnicity. The pooled odds ratio (OR) with corresponding 95 % confidence interval (95 %CI) was used to assess the association. Overall, there was a significant association between GSTT1 null genotype and increased risk of children asthma (OR = 1.25, 95 % CI, 1.02–1.54; P = 0.032). Subgroup analyses showed GSTT1 null genotype was associated with increased risk of children asthma in Caucasians (OR = 1.46, 95 % CI, 1.04–2.03; P = 0.027), but not in Asians (OR = 1.03, 95 % CI, 0.55–1.94; P = 0.928) and Africans (OR = 1.33, 95 % CI, 0.92–1.91; P = 0.127). There was no evidence of publication bias in the subgroup analysis of Caucasians. In conclusion, there is a significant association between GSTT1 null genotype and risk of asthma during childhood in Caucasians. More well-designed epidemiological studies are needed to further assess this association in Asians and Africans.     

Lack of association between glutathione S-transferase T1 gene polymorphism and laryngeal cancer susceptibility: a meta-analysis based on 2,124 cases and 2,059 controls

Studies investigating the association between glutathione S-transferase T1 (GSTT1) gene polymorphism and laryngeal cancer susceptibility have reported conflicting results. The aim of the present study was to conduct a meta-analysis assessing the possible association of GSTT1 gene polymorphism with laryngeal cancer risk. The relevant studies were identified through a search of PubMed, Embase, ISI Web of Knowledge and Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure until May 2011. Twelve studies were included in the present meta-analysis, which described a total of 2124 laryngeal cancer cases and 2059 controls. The overall odds ratio (OR) for GSTT1 null genotype was 1.40 (95% CI = 0.90-2.16). When stratifying for race, the pooled ORs for GSTT1 null genotype were 1.07 (95% CI = 0.81-1.41) in Caucasians and 5.63 (95% CI = 1.00-31.83) in Asians. The pooled ORs for GSTT1 null genotype were 1.03 (95% CI = 0.71-1.49) in population-based studies and 2.39 (95% CI = 0.73-7.86) in hospital-based studies, stratifying for study design. This meta-analysis suggested that there was lack of association between GSTT1 gene polymorphism and laryngeal cancer risk. However, larger scale primary studies are still required to further evaluate the interaction of GSTT1 gene polymorphism with laryngeal cancer risk.     

Glutathione S-transferases gene polymorphisms and risk of male idiopathic infertility: a systematic review and meta-analysis

The Glutathione S-transferases (GSTs) polymorphisms have been implicated in susceptibility to male idiopathic infertility, but study results are still controversial. To investigate the genetic associations between GSTs polymorphisms and risk of male idiopathic infertility, a systematic review and meta-analysis were performed. Meta-analysis was performed by pooling odds ratio (OR) with its corresponding 95 % confidence interval (95 % CI) form studies in electronic databases up to March 16, 2012. Glutathione S-transferase M 1 (GSTM1) null genotype, Glutathione S-transferase T 1 (GSTT1) null genotype, and dual null genotype of GSTM1/GSTT1 were analyzed independently. 14 eligible studies with a total of 1,845 idiopathic infertility males and 1,729 controls were included. There were 13 studies on GSTM1 polymorphism, 10 ones on GSTT1 polymorphism and 5 ones on GSTM1-GSTT1 interaction analysis. Meta-analyses of total relevant studies showed GSTM1 null genotype was significantly associated with an increased risk of male idiopathic infertility (OR = 1.40, 95 % CI 1.07–1.84, P _OR = 0.015). The GSTM1-GSTT1 interaction analysis showed dual null genotype of GSTM1/GSTT1 was also significantly associated with increased risk of male idiopathic infertility (OR = 1.85, 95 % CI 1.07–3.21, P _OR = 0.028). Subgroup analyses by ethnicity showed the associations above were still statistically significant in Caucasians (For GSTM1, OR = 1.51, 95 % CI 1.11–2.05, P _OR = 0.009; For GSTM1/GSTT1, OR = 2.10, 95 % CI 1.51–2.91, P _OR < 0.001). This meta-analysis suggests GSTM1 null genotype contributes to increased risk of male idiopathic infertility in Caucasians, and males with dual null genotype of GSTM1/GSTT1 are particularly susceptible to developing idiopathic infertility.     

Ethnic differences in the association of the glutathione S-transferase T1 (GSTT1) null genotype and risk of gastric carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of the association between the glutathione S-transferase T1 (GSTT1) deletion polymorphism and gastric cancer risk in populations from different ethnic backgrounds, based on a comprehensive literature search of the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and COCHRANE libraries. Thirty-six individual case–control studies comprising 7,689 gastric cancer cases and 12,445 controls were included in our meta-analysis. Overall, the GSTT1 null genotype appeared to increase gastric cancer risk (OR 1.17, 95 % CI 1.06–1.31, p = 0.003). While Caucasian populations showed an association between the GSTT1 deletion polymorphism and gastric cancer risk (OR 1.27, 95 % CI 1.05–1.52, p = 0.01), Asian populations did not show such an association (p = 0.11). When stratified by quality assessment scores, a significant association between the GSTT1 deletion polymorphism and gastric cancer risk was observed only in the Caucasian high quality subgroup (OR 1.27 95 % CI 1.01–1.60, p = 0.05). Null genotypes for both GSTT1 and GSTM1 deletion polymorphisms also increased gastric cancer risk (OR 1.37, 95 % CI 1.04–1.80, p = 0.03). Our study suggests that the GSTT1 null genotype is associated with a significant increase in gastric cancer risk in Caucasians, but not in Asians. Further well-designed studies are required to confirm the association between GSTT1 polymorphisms and gastric cancer risk in relation to various clinicopathological factors in different ethnic groups, especially Caucasians.     

A meta-analysis of the association of glutathione S-transferase P1 gene polymorphism with the susceptibility of breast cancer

Glutathione S-transferase P1 (GSTP1) is one of the important mutant sites for the cancer risk at present. The conclusions of the published reports on the relationship between GSTP1 A/G gene polymorphism and the risk of breast cancer are still debated. This meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the association between GSTP1 and the risk of breast cancer. The association reports were identified from PubMed and Cochrane Library, and eligible studies were included and synthesized using meta-analysis method. 35 investigations were included into this meta-analysis for the association of GSTP1 A/G gene polymorphism and breast cancer susceptibility, consisting of 40,347 subjects (18,665 patients with breast cancer and 21,682 controls). The association between GSTP1 A/G gene polymorphism and breast cancer risk was not found for overall population, Caucasians and Africans. Interestingly, the GSTP1 A/G gene polymorphism was associated with the susceptibility of breast cancer in Asians (G allele: OR = 1.10, 95 % CI: 1.04–1.17, P = 0.001; GG genotype: OR = 1.36, 95 % CI: 1.14–1.62, P = 0.0008; AA genotype: OR = 0.92, 95 % CI: 0.85–0.98, P = 0.02). Furthermore, the GSTP1 A/G gene polymorphism was associated with the susceptibility of breast cancer for the analysis of the controls from hospital. In conclusion, GSTP1 A/G gene polymorphism is associated with the breast cancer susceptibility in Asians. However, more studies on the relationship between GSTP1 A/G gene polymorphism and the risk of breast cancer should be performed in further.     

Meta-analysis of the association of glutathione S-transferase T1 null/presence gene polymorphism with the risk of gastric carcinoma

A possible association of glutathione S-transferase T1 (GSTT1) null/presence gene polymorphism and an increased risk of developing gastric carcinoma is still unclear and hotly debated. This investigation was performed to assess the association of the GSTT1 null/presence gene polymorphism with the risk of gastric carcinoma via a meta-analysis to increase sample size and statistical significance. PubMed, Cochrane Library and CBM-disc (China Biological Medicine Database) were searched on March 1, 2013, association reports were identified, and eligible studies were recruited and synthesized. Fifty-two reports were found to be suitable for this meta-analysis for the association of the GSTT1 null genotype with gastric carcinoma risk. The results showed that there was a significantly increased gastric carcinoma risk when the GSTT1 null genotype was present in the overall population (OR 1.21, 95 % CI 1.11–1.32, P < 0.0001), Caucasians (OR 1.25, 95 % CI 1.05–1.48, P = 0.01), East-Asians (OR 1.18, 95 % CI 1.06–1.31, P = 0.003), and Chinese (OR 1.24, 95 % CI 1.07–1.44, P = 0.005). However, no statistically relevant association could be established for the Indian ethnic group (OR 1.33, 95 % CI 0.94–1.90, P = 0.11). In conclusion, the GSTT1 null genotype is associated with an increased gastric carcinoma risk in the overall population, Caucasians, East-Asians, and Chinese.     

Glutathione S-transferase polymorphisms, asthma susceptibility and confounding variables: a meta-analysis

Oxidative stress is one of the main risk factors for asthma development. Glutathione S-transferases play an important role in antioxidant defences and may influence asthma susceptibility. In particular, GSTM1 and GSTT1 positive/null genotypes and the GSTP1*Ile105 Val polymorphism have been analyzed in a number of genetic association studies, with conflicting outcomes. Two previous meta-analyses have attempted to clarify the associations between GST genes and asthma, but these studies have also showed contrasting results. Our aim was to perform a meta-analysis that included independent genetic association studies on GSTM1, GSTP1, and GSTT1, evaluating also the effect of potential confounding variables (i.e. ethnicity, population age, and urbanization). Systematic review and meta-analysis of the effects of GST genes on asthma were conducted. The meta-analyses were performed using a fixed or, where appropriate, random effects model. The meta-analysis of the GSTM1 (n = 35), GSTT1 (n = 31) and GSTP1 (n = 28) studies suggests that no significant associations with asthma susceptibility were observed for GSTM1 and GSTP1 gene polymorphisms, whereas a significant outcome was detected for the GSTT1 positive/null genotype (pooled OR = 1.33, 95 %CI = 1.10–1.60). However, high between-study heterogeneity was identified in all the general analyses (p _{heterogenetity} < 0.05). The stratification analysis seems to explain the heterogeneity only in few cases. This picture is probably due to the interactive process of genetics and environment that characterizes disease pathogenesis. Further studies on interactions of GST genes with the potential oxidative stress sources and with other antioxidant genes are needed to explain the role of GST enzymes in asthma.     

The association between common genetic variant of microRNA-499 and cancer susceptibility: a meta-analysis

Published data on the association between microRNA-499 (miR-499) rs3746444 T>C polymorphism and cancer susceptibility are inconclusive. To derive a more precise estimation of this relationship, a comprehensive meta-analysis was performed on nine published studies, with a total sample of 4,794 cases and 5,971 controls. Overall, no significant association was found between miR-499 polymorphism and cancer risk after all studies were pooled into the meta-analysis. However, in the subgroup analysis by ethnicity, significant association with an increased risk was found in Asian (CC vs. TT: OR = 1.439, 95 % CI = 1.118–1.852, P = 0.005, p-heterogeneity = 0.116). Moreover, in the the subgroup analysis by cancer type, this SNP was associated with an increased risk of breast cancer in the recessive model (OR = 1.077, 95 % CI = 1.008–1.151, P = 0.028, p-heterogeneity = 0.125). Our findings support the view that miR-499 rs3746444 T>C polymorphism is associated with breast cancer and the C allele can increase cancer susceptibility in Asian.     

Assessment of the association between GSTM1 null genotype and risk of type 2 diabetes

Many studies have investigated the association between Glutathione S-Transferase M1 (GSTM1) null genotype and risk of diabetes mellitus, but the impact of GSTM1 null genotype on diabetes mellitus is unclear owing to the obvious inconsistence among those studies. This study aimed to quantify the strength of association between GSTM1 null genotype and risk of diabetes mellitus. We searched the PubMed, Embase and Wangfang databases for studies relating the association between GSTM1 null genotype and risk of diabetes mellitus. We estimated summary odds ratio (OR) with their 95 % confidence interval (95 % CI) to assess the association. Subgroup analyses were performed by type of diabetes and ethnicity. 10 case–control studies with 7, 054 subjects were included into this meta-analysis. Meta-analysis of total 10 studies showed GSTM1 null genotype was associated increased risk of diabetes mellitus (OR = 1.59, 95 % CI 1.14–2.22, P = 0.007). Subgroup analyses by type of diabetes mellitus suggested GSTM1 null genotype was associated increased risk of type 2 diabetes (OR = 1.90, 95 % CI 1.37–2.64, P < 0.001), but was not associated with risk of type 1 diabetes (OR = 0.84, 95 % CI 0.66–1.07, P = 0.153). Subgroup analysis by ethnicity further identified the obvious association between GSTM1 null genotype and increased risk of type 2 diabetes. The cumulative meta-analyses showed a trend of obvious association between GSTM1 null genotype and risk of type 2 diabetes as information accumulated. No evidence of publication bias was observed. Thus, evidence from current meta-analysis suggests an association between GSTM1 null genotype and risk of type 2 diabetes.     

Association between the CYP1A2-164 A/C polymorphism and colorectal cancer susceptibility: a meta-analysis

To date, epidemiological studies have assessed the association between CYP1A2-164 A/C polymorphism and colorectal cancer susceptibility. However, the results of these studies remained controversial. We aimed to examine the associations by conducting a meta-analysis of case–control studies. A total of 11 studies including 5,093 cases and 5,941 controls evaluated the association between the CYP1A2-164 A/C polymorphism and colorectal cancer susceptibility. No significantly associations were found in all genetic models (CC vs. AA: OR = 1.14, 95 % CI = 0.93–1.40; AC vs. AA: OR = 1.05, 95 % CI = 0.91–1.20; dominant model: OR = 1.08, 95 % CI = 0.95–1.24; recessive model: OR = 1.10, 95 % CI = 0.95–1.28). In the subgroup analysis by ethnicity or source of controls, there were still no significant associations detected in all genetic models. This meta-analysis suggested the CYP1A2-164 A/C polymorphism was not a risk factor for increasing colorectal cancer, further large and well-designed studies are needed to confirm these conclusions.     

XRCC1 Arg399Gln polymorphism contributes to increased risk of colorectal cancer in Chinese population

Previous studies investigating the association between X-ray repair cross-complementation group 1 (XRCC1) Arg399Gln polymorphism and colorectal cancer risk in Chinese provided inconsistent findings. To assess the association in Chinese population, a meta-analysis was performed. Eligible studies were searched in Pubmed, Emabse, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure databases. Odds ratios (OR) with the corresponding 95 % confidence intervals (95 %CI) were pooled to assess the association. Seven case–control studies involving a total of 2136 colorectal cancer cases and 3168 controls were finally included in the meta-analysis. Our analysis suggested that the variant genotypes of XRCC1 Arg399Gln were associated with an increased risk of colorectal cancer in Chinese population (Gln vs. Arg: random effect model OR = 1.24, 95 %CI = 1.01–1.52, P = 0.041; GlnGln vs. ArgArg: random effect model OR = 1.52, 95 %CI = 1.07–2.15, P = 0.019; and Recessive model: fixed effect model OR = 1.37, 95 %CI = 1.12–1.67, P = 0.002). There was low risk of publication bias in present meta-analysis. Our meta-analysis provides an evidence for the association between XRCC1 Arg399Gln polymorphism and colorectal cancer risk in Chinese population, and XRCC1 Arg399Gln variant genotypes contribute to increased risk of colorectal cancer in Chinese.     

GPX1 gene Pro200Leu polymorphism, erythrocyte GPX activity, and cancer risk

A meta-analysis was conducted to assess the effect of glutathione peroxidase1 (GPX1) gene Pro200Leu (rs1050450) polymorphism on cancer risk. A comprehensive search was performed to identify all studies on the association of GPX1 gene Pro200Leu polymorphism with cancer risk. The fixed or random effect pooled measure was selected based on homogeneity test among studies. Heterogeneity among studies was evaluated using the I ². Potential sources of between-study heterogeneity were explored by meta-regression and the sensitivity analysis. Publication bias was estimated using Egger’s linear regression test. 35 published articles with 36 results were identified involving 16,920 cases and 19,946 controls. Results from the articles that both obeyed Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium in controls and met high quality design, showed no significant association of GPX1 gene Pro200Leu polymorphism with cancer risk in any of dominant (OR = 1.05, 95 %CI = 0.98–1.12), recessive (OR = 1.04 (0.95–1.13), and TT versus CC (OR = 1.05, 95 %CI = 0.97–1.15) models, and the findings were consistent considering the stratified analysis by cancer type. However, multivariate-adjusted ORs from articles that both obeyed Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium in controls and met high quality design, showed a significant association considering dominant (OR = 1.22, 95 %CI = 1.06–1.41), TT versus CC (OR = 1.16, 95 %CI = 1.02–1.32) models, and a marginally significant association was found considering TC versus CC (OR = 1.11, 95 %CI = 0.99–1.25) model. And compared with the CC genotype, the erythrocyte GPX activity was significantly lower for TT genotype: the standardized mean difference (SMD) = ?0.37, 95 %CI = (?0.624, ?0.118), and CT genotype: SMD = ?0.19, 95 %CI = (?0.37, ?0.002). The association of GPX1 gene Pro200Leu polymorphism with cancer risk might be influenced by confounders.     

Significant Association of Glutathione S-Transferase T1 Null Genotype with Prostate Cancer Risk: A Meta-Analysis of 26,393 Subjects

Background

Recent studies on the association between Glutathione S-transferase T1 (GSTT1) polymorphism and risk of prostate cancer showed inconclusive results. To clarify this possible association, we conducted a meta-analysis of published studies.

Methods

Data were collected from the following electronic databases: Pubmed, Embase, and Chinese Biomedical Database (CBM). The odds ratio (OR) and its 95% confidence interval (95%CI) was used to assess the strength of the association. We summarized the data on the association between GSTT1 null genotype and risk of prostate cancer in the overall population, and performed subgroup analyses by ethnicity, adjusted ORs, and types of controls.

Results

Ultimately, a total of 43 studies with a total of 26,393 subjects (9,934 cases and 16,459 controls) were eligible for meta-analysis. Overall, there was a significant association between GSTT1 null genotype and increased risk of prostate cancer (OR = 1.14, 95%CI 1.01–1.29, P = 0.034). Meta-analysis of adjusted ORs also showed a significant association between GSTT1 null genotype and increased risk of prostate cancer (OR = 1.34, 95%CI 1.09–1.64, P = 0.006). Similar results were found in the subgroup analyses by ethnicity and types of controls.

Conclusion

This meta-analysis demonstrates that GSTT1 null genotype is associated with prostate cancer susceptibility, and GSTT1 null genotype contributes to increased risk of prostate cancer.     

Association between GSTP1, GSTM1 and GSTT1 polymorphisms involved in xenobiotic metabolism and head and neck cancer development

Polymorphisms in the glutathione S-transferase superfamily genes that encodes enzymes involved in the phase II xenobiotic metabolism may lead head and neck cancer development. In this study we investigate the association of A313G and C341T GSTP1 polymorphisms, GSTM1 and GSTT1 null genotypes in the head and neck cancer development, interactions between these polymorphisms,the tumor histopathologic parameters and risk factors (smoking and drinking) were also evaluated in the case–control study. 775 individuals (261 patients/514 controls) were included in the study. Molecular analyzes were performed by PCR and PCR–RFLP; and statistical analyzes by Chi square and multiple logistic regression. Chi square test showed that only the genotype frequencies for GSTM1 and GSTT1 were in Hardy–Weinberg disequilibrium in both groups. Significant results with p ≤ 0.05 showed that age ≥ 48 years (OR = 11.87; 7.55–18.65), smoking (OR = 4.25; 2.70–6.69), drinking (OR = 1.59; 1.02–2.46) were possible predictors for the head and neck cancer development and the presence of A313G GSTP1 polymorphism (OR = 0.62; 0.42–0.92) decreased the risk for this disease. Individuals with the 313AG/GG GSTP1 and age ≥ 48 years (OR = 0.59; 0.38–0.91), male gender (OR = 0.54; 0.35–0.83), smokers (OR = 0.63; 0.40–0.99) and drinkers (OR = 0.57; 0.35–0.95); the GSTM1 null genotype and age < 48 years (OR = 2.46; 1.09–5.55); the GSTT1 null genotype and primary anatomical sites of pharynx (OR = 0.37; 0.17–0.79) and larynx (OR = 3.60; 1.93–6.72), can modulate the risk for the disease development. The variables age ≥ 48 years, smoking and drinking can be predictors for head and neck cancer development; moreover, A313G GSTP1 polymorphism, GSTM1 and GSTT1 null genotypes can modulate the risk for this disease.     

Glutathione S-transferase M1, T1, and P1 polymorphisms and risk of glioma: a meta-analysis

The relationship between genetic polymorphisms of glutathione S-transferase (GST) and the development of glioma has been investigated in several epidemiologic studies. However these studies report inconsistent results. In order to quantitatively summarise the evidence for such a relationship, a meta-analysis is conducted. The PubMed database was searched from inception to January 2012 to identify relevant studies that met pre-stated inclusion criteria. We also reviewed reference lists from retrieved articles. Two researchers evaluated study eligibility and extracted the data independently, and disagreements were resolved by discussion. The principal outcome measure was the odds ratio (OR) with 95 % confidence interval (CI) for the risk of glioma associated with GSTM1, GSTT1, GSTP1 I105V or GSTP1 A114V. This meta-analysis included 11 case–control studies, which included 2,404 glioma cases and 6,379 controls. The combined results based on all studies showed that there was no association between any of the GST variants and the risk of glioma (for GSTM1: pooled OR = 1.03; 95 % CI, 0.92–1.15; for GSTT1: pooled OR = 1.12; 95 % CI, 0.90–1.40; for GSTP1 I105V: pooled OR = 0.92; 95 % CI, 0.64–1.31 and for GSTP1 A114V: pooled OR = 1.14; 95 % CI, 0.97–1.34). Subgroup analyses showed that GSTP1 A114V genotype was associated with an increased risk of other histopathologic glioma except glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) (pooled OR = 1.30; 95 % CI = 1.06–1.60); no relationship was found between other GST variants and histopathologic groups. In conclusion, our meta-analysis suggests no association between GST variants and the risk of glioma. However, the significant risk elevation is present between GSTP1 A114V genotype and other histopathologic glioma except GBM.     

Lung cancer risk in north Indian population: role of genetic polymorphisms and smoking

Lung cancer (LC) is the leading cause of cancer-related mortality in developing as well as developed countries. Life style choices, particularly tobacco smoking, have been implicated as the main cause in the development of the LC. Despite the fact that majority cases of the LC occur among smokers, only 1–15% of smokers develop LC. In the present study, we have explored the role of genetic polymorphism, smoking habit and their association to LC in a cohort of north Indian population. The polymorphic genes explored were CYP1A1, GSTM1, GSTP1 and GSTT1 using techniques of Polymerase chain reaction (PCR), Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism (RFLP), Real Time PCR (RT PCR), and gene sequencing. Genetic polymorphism was analysed in 253 normal participants (control) and 93 LC patients originating from Lucknow, India. Data were compared using odds ratio and Fisher Exact Test. We found that smoking increases the susceptibility to LC threefold (OR = 2.9; 95% CI: 0.9–2.8). The most significant risk for LC (OR = 3.2; 95% CI: 0.7–3.8) was found in the association of the homozygous variant of CYP1A1 gene at A2455G base change at Exon 7 (Val/Val) genotype. There was a marginally significant association between LC and GSTT1 null genotype (OR = 1.3; 95% CI: 1.0–1.7) while no significant risk association was found between GSTP1 polymorphism and LC. The present study demonstrates that the presence of null genotype of GSTM1/GSTT1 taken together with CYP1A1 (Val/Val) genotype increases the susceptibility to LC eightfold in comparison to CYP1A1 (Ile/Ile) and GSTM1/ GSTT1 genotype.     

Genetic polymorphism of glutathione S-transferase T1 and the risk of colorectal cancer: A meta-analysis

Background: Studies investigating the association between genetic polymorphism of glutathione S-transferase T1 (GSTT1) and risk of colorectal cancer have reported conflicting results. In order to clarify the effect of GSTT1 polymorphism on the risk of developing colorectal cancer, we carried out a meta-analysis using published data to obtain more precise estimates of risk. Methods: Electronic searches of PubMed and EMBASE were conducted to select studies for this meta-analysis. Papers were included if they were observational studies investigating the association between GSTT1 polymorphism and colorectal cancer risk. The principal outcome measure was the odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) for the risk of colorectal cancer associated with GSTT1 null genotype. Results: We identified 30 eligible studies, which included 7635 cases and 12,911 controls. The combined results based on all studies showed that there was a statistically significant link between GSTT1 null genotype and colorectal cancer risk (OR = 1.20, 95% CI = 1.03–1.40). In the analysis of ethnic groups, we observed distinct differences associated with GSTT1 null genotype, the pooled odds ratios for the GSTT1 polymorphism were 1.32 in Caucasians (95% CI = 1.09–1.58) and 1.03 in Asians (95% CI = 0.81–1.32). As far as concerned the interaction between GSTT1 genotype and colorectal cancer risk in relation to smoking history, there was no increase in risk for smokers or nonsmokers with the GSTT1 null genotype (smokers: OR = 1.13, 95% CI = 0.80–1.60, nonsmokers: OR = 0.99, 95% CI = 0.71–1.38). When stratifying by the location of colorectal cancer, we found that there was a statistically significant link in rectal cancer (OR = 1.50, 95% CI = 1.09–2.07), but not in colon cancer (OR = 1.33, 95% CI = 0.94–1.88). No associations could be detected between null GSTT1 polymorphism and age, sex, tumor stage and differentiation. Conclusion: Our current study demonstrates that GSTT1 null genotype is associated with an increased risk of colorectal cancer, specifically, among Caucasians.     

CTLA-4 polymorphisms and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE): a meta-analysis

The aim of this study was to summarize results on the association of cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4) promoter exon-1 +49 and 1722T/C polymorphism with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) susceptibility by using the meta-analysis. We searched all the publications about the association between CTLA-4) promoter exon-1 +49 and 1722T/C polymorphism and SLE from PubMed, Elsevier Science Direct, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database (CBM), Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), and Wanfang (Chinese). Previous CTLA-4 association studies with SLE, however, have produced inconsistent results. We have performed a meta-analysis to better assess the purported associations. A total of 17 independent studies (to June 2012) testing association between one or more CTLA-4 polymorphisms and SLE were used in this analysis. We have compared allele and genotype frequencies at two polymorphic sites found in exon-1 (at +49) and the promoter region (at ?1722). The data demonstrate that the exon-1 +49 polymorphism is associated with SLE susceptibility in Asian population. The overall risk, measured by odds ratio (OR), stratification by ethnicity indicates the exon-1 +49 GG+GA genotype is associated with SLE, at least in Asians (OR = 0.85, 95 % CI = 0.73–0.99, P = 0.04 for GG+GA vs. AA; OR = 0.85, 95 % CI = 0.72–1.00, P = 0.05 for AG vs. AA). Similar trends are found in allele-specific risk estimates and disease association. Overall, there was significant association between the 1722T/C polymorphism and overall SLE risks (OR = 0.78, 95 % CI = 0.63–0.97, P = 0.04 for GG+GA vs. AA, OR = 0.87, 95 % CI = 0.76–0.99, P = 0.04 for G vs. A) in Asian population.In summary, this meta-analysis demonstrates that the CTLA-4 promoter +49A/G and promoter ?1722C/T polymorphism may confer susceptibility to SLE, especially in Asian-derived population.