Receptor-mediated gonadotropin action in the ovary. Demonstration of acute dependence of rat luteal cells on exogenously supplied steroid precursor (sterols) for gonadotropin-induced steroidogenesis

Incubation of luteal cells with human, horse and rat sera, but not bovine sera resulted in enhanced basal and hCG-stimulated progesterone accumulation. The stimulatory effect of human or rat sera on basal, hCG- or 8 Br-cyclic AMP-induced progesterone synthesis in luteal cells was evident within 15-30 min after incubation, reaching a maximum after 3-4 h. The stimulatory effects of hCG and/or sera were blocked by inhibitors of RNA and protein synthesis. Similarly, lysosomotropic agents, chloroquine (100 microM) and ammonium chloride (10 mM), partly blocked the steroidogenic response of luteal cells to hCG and/or human or rat sera. Incubation of cells in the presence of 2-deoxyglucose, sodium azide and phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride resulted in partial inhibition of progesterone secretion in response to hCG or sera. Fractionation of human or rat sera into various lipoprotein fractions demonstrated that LDL and HDL most effectively supported and potentiated the steroidogenic response to hCG. Lipoprotein-deficient serum, however, did not alter gonadotropin-induced steroid production. Incubation of luteal cells with increasing concentrations of h-LDL and h-HDL enhanced both basal and hCG-mediated steroidogenesis in a dose-related manner, although very high concentrations of these lipoproteins were inhibitory. Further, [3H]cholesterol from [3H]cholesteryl linoleate-LDL was incorporated into luteal cell progesterone and the extent of this incorporation was enhanced by hCG. Addition of excess unlabeled h-LDL, h-HDL, as well as r-HDL, drastically reduced the incorporation of radioactive label into progesterone. These studies suggest that (a) serum potentiation of steroidogenesis was due to presence of lipoproteins, mainly LDL and HDL, and (b) the lipoprotein-bound cholesterol is delivered into the luteal cells and utilized for steroidogenesis.     

The role of plasma lipoproteins in steroidogenic response of rat luteal cells during gonadotropin-induced refractory states

Administration of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) to pregnant mare's serum gonadotropin--hCG primed rats results in the loss of in vitro responsiveness of the ovaries to exogenous gonadotropins for progesterone production. This state is associated with a loss of membrane receptors for hCG and a concomitant increase in lipoprotein receptors. Although lipoproteins potentiated gonadotropin response in ovaries from saline-injected rats, no stimulation was observed in hCG-desensitized ovarian cells. Examination of the time course for the loss of lipoprotein response after hCG injection revealed that injection with 50 IU of hCG results in a loss of gonadotropin response as early as 1 h after injection, but exogenous cholesterol-carrying lipoprotein fractions, LDL and HDL, were capable of stimulating progesterone production up to 4 h after hormone injection. Measurement of endogenous cholesteryl ester content showed that there was a 72% decline during this period with a concomitant increase in the basal progesterone production. One hour after hCG injection there was no stimulation of steroidogenesis by hCG in the presence or absence of exogenous lipoproteins. The refractoriness to exogenous hCG appeared only 4 h later when the hCG dose was reduced to 10 IU, whereas with 25 IU of hCG, the effect was similar to that observed using 50 IU of hCG. Such diverse steroidogenic stimuli as hCG, LH, LDL, cAMP, and cholera enterotoxin failed to stimulate progesterone synthesis in vitro in luteal cells of rats injected with 50 IU of hCG 48 h prior to sacrifice.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Effect of prostaglandin E2 alpha on the hCG-stimulated progesterone production by human corpora lutea

The effect of prostaglandin PGF2 alpha on the hCG stimulated and basal progesterone production by human corpora lutea was examined in vitro. hCG (40 i.u./ml) stimulated progesterone formation in corpora lutea of early (days 16-19 of a normal 28 day cycle), mid (days 20-22) and late (days 23-27) luteal phases. This stimulation was inhibited by PGF2 alpha (10 micrograms/ml) in corpora lutea of mid and late luteal phases. PGF2 alpha alone did not show a consistent effect on basal progesterone production. The inhibition of hCG stimulated progesterone production by PGF2 alpha at times corresponding to luteolysis indicates a role for that prostaglandin in the process of luteolysis in the human corpus luteum.     

Effect of prostaglandin F2α on the hCG-stimulated progesterone production by human corpora lutea

The effect of prostaglandin PGF_2α on the hCG stimulated and basal progesterone production by human corpora lutea was examined . hCG (40 i.u./ml) stimulated progesterone formation in corpora lutea of early (days 16–19 of a normal 28 day cycle), mid (days 20–22) and late (days 23–27) luteal phases. This stimulation was inhibited by PGF_2α (10 μg/ml) in corpora lutea of mid and late luteal phases. PGF_2α alone did not show a consistent effect on basal progesterone production. The inhibition of hCG stimulated progesterone production by PGF_2α at times corresponding to luteolysis indicates a role for that prostaglandin in the process of luteolysis in the human corpus luteum.     

Dose response of luteinized porcine granulosa cells in vitro to prolactin: dependency on pre-exposure to human chorionic gonadotrophin

This study examined the hypothesis that human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG) increases prolactin (PRL) stimulation of the utilization of lipoprotein-borne cholesterol by pig luteinized granulosa cells in culture. These cells, which luteinize in culture, were harvested from 6-mm or greater diameter follicles and cultured in the presence of 1% fetal calf serum and 1 microgram/mL insulin for 48 h. On the third day, the media were replaced with fresh serum-free media, with the same dose of insulin, and on the following day (day 4) the media were replaced with serum- and insulin-free media. At this time (day 4) hCG was added to some cultures. On day 5, cells from the group with hCG and cells from the group without hCG were treated with graded doses of ovine PRL (0.1-3.0 micrograms/mL). To a second set of cells, likewise treated, 100 micrograms of porcine low density lipoprotein (LDL) was added. Two days later (day 7) media were sampled and replaced with media alone or media containing hormones and (or) LDL. On day 9 cultures were terminated. In the cells pre-exposed to hCG, PRL (1 microgram/mL) in the presence of LDL increased progesterone production 1.7-fold (p less than 0.01) on day 7 and 2.2-fold (p less than 0.01) on day 9. In the granulosa cells in culture pre-exposed to hCG, the effect of PRL on LDL utilization was dose dependent and saturable at 1 microgram/mL on days 7 and 9. We conclude that brief pretreatment of luteinized pig granulosa cells with hCG results in a dose-dependent PRL-induced utilization of LDL for progesterone synthesis.     

Effects of in vivo and in vitro administration of prostaglandin F2 alpha on lipoprotein utilization in cultured bovine luteal cells

Two experiments were conducted to determine if a loss in the ability to utilize lipoprotein-cholesterol is one mechanism whereby prostaglandin F2 alpha (PGF2 alpha) decreases steroidogenesis in bovine luteal cells. In the first experiment, serum-free cultures of bovine luteal cells were treated with PGF2 alpha (100 ng/ml) for 5 days prior to addition of lipoproteins. Exposure to PGF2 alpha completely suppressed low-density lipoprotein (LDL)- and high-density lipoprotein (HDL)-stimulated progesterone production (p less than 0.01) compared to control (no PGF2 alpha) cultures. Luteal cells cultured in the presence of LDL + luteinizing hormone (LH, 10 ng/ml) + PGF2 alpha produced significantly less progesterone than luteal cells cultured with LDL + LH (p less than 0.05). Treatment with PGF2 alpha had no significant effect on HDL + LH-stimulated progesterone synthesis. In the second experiment, cows were injected with a luteolytic dose of PGF2 alpha (25 mg), and the corpora lutea were removed at 0 (no PG), 1, 4, or 12 h post-injection. Dissociated luteal cells were placed in culture for 7 days, either with or without LH (10 ng/ml), and lipoproteins were added on Days 5-7. LH stimulation of progesterone production was apparent in cultures obtained at 0 and 12 (p less than 0.05) but not 1 and 4 h post-PGF2 alpha. Addition of either LDL or HDL increased progesterone synthesis in all cultures, regardless of time following in vivo administration of PGF2 alpha. It is concluded that PGF2 alpha can inhibit bovine luteal cell utilization of either LDL or HDL in vitro. However, luteal cell utilization of lipoproteins in vitro is not adversely affected by in vivo exposure to PGF2 alpha, if collected within 12 h post-PGF2 alpha.     

Effect of lipoproteins and luteotrophins on progesterone accumulation by luteal cells from the pregnant pig

The roles of prolactin (Prl) and LH in the maintenance of luteal function in pregnant pigs were investigated. Luteal cells from pigs between days 70 to 95 of pregnancy were dissociated and incubated for 4 h. In the absence of exogenous cholesterol, LH exhibited a dose-dependent stimulatory effect on progesterone secretion. Prl had a mild stimulatory effect on progesterone accumulation and at lower doses Prl potentiated the response to LH. Low density lipoprotein (LDL) but not high density lipoprotein (HDL) had a mild stimulatory effect on progesterone secretion. When exogenous cholesterol was provided as the substrate in the form of LDL or HDL, Prl had a striking stimulatory effect on progesterone secretion. When 25-hydroxycholesterol which bypasses the lipoprotein receptor was provided as the substrate, Prl failed to stimulate progesterone accumulation. The stimulatory effect of LH was potentiated when LDL, HDL, or 25-hydroxycholesterol were present. The results of this study suggest that LH increases the uptake of exogenous cholesterol in the form of lipoproteins and enhances the utilization of internalized cholesterol for progesterone synthesis. Prl appears to stimulate progesterone synthesis by enhancing the uptake of lipoproteins.     

Lipoprotein-stimulated and estradiol-maintained progesterone secretion by dissociated rabbit luteal cells in vitro

Elevated activity of 3-hydroxy-3-methyglutaryl coenzyme A reductase (HMG-CoA reductase) was observed in the rabbit ovary and corpus luteum during pregnancy. Based on this study, it was proposed that de novo cholesterol synthesis rather than the uptake of exogenous plasma cholesterol (lipoproteins) was of primary importance in providing steroid substrate for progesterone synthesis by the rabbit luteal cell. Using a perifusion system, the present study challenges this hypothesis by demonstrating that both low- and high-density lipoproteins (at protein concentrations of 100 micrograms/ml and 50 micrograms/ml, respectively) were able to acutely stimulate progesterone production by dissociated rabbit luteal cells. The increase in progesterone synthesis was due to increased cholesterol substrate and not to protein-enhanced progesterone release. The ability of luteal cells to respond to lipoproteins was dependent on both dose- and sequence of treatment, with high-density lipoprotein (HDL) being unable to stimulate progesterone production if preceded by perifusion with low-density lipoprotein (LDL) or HDL. In addition, 17 beta-estradiol appeared to regulate lipoprotein utilization by attenuating the LDL response after 1 h of perifusion. We conclude that lipoproteins may provide cholesterol substrate for progesterone biosynthesis in vitro and that 17 beta-estradiol, in addition to maintaining progesterone production by luteal cells, may also regulate lipoprotein utilization. Thus, maintenance of steady progesterone secretion in response to estradiol supercedes that of LDL-stimulated progesterone secretion by rabbit luteal cells in vitro. This study suggests an interaction between estrogen and lipoproteins that may prove physiologically important in regulating progesterone production by rabbit luteal cells in vivo.     

Progesterone production by luteal cells isolated from cynomolgus monkeys: effects of gonadotropin and prolactin during acute incubation and cell culture

Corpus luteum function in cynomolgus monkeys (Macaca fascicularis) during the menstrual cycle and immediately following parturition was evaluated through in vitro studies on progesterone production by dispersed luteal cells in the presence and absence of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) or human prolactin (hPRL). Luteal cells isolated between days 17-20 of the menstrual cycle secreted progesterone (P) during short-term incubation (21.6 +/- 1.2 ngP/ml/5 X 10(4) cells/3 hr, X +/- S.E., n = 7) and responded to the addition of 1-100 ng hCG with a significant (p less than 0.05) increase in P secretion. Cells removed the day of delivery secreted large, but variable (27.9-222 ng/ml, n = 4) amounts of P during short-term incubation. Moreover, hCG (100 ng/ml) stimulation of P production by cells at delivery (176 +/- 19% of control) was less than that of cells from the cycle of (336 +/- 65%). The presence of hPRL (2.5-5000 ng/ml) failed to influence P secretion by luteal cells during short-term incubation in the presence or absence of hCG. P production by luteal cells obtained following delivery declined markedly during 8 days of culture in Ham's F10 medium: 10% fetal calf serum. Continual exposure to 100 ng/ml of hCG or hPRL failed to influence P secretion through Day 2 of culture. Thereafter hCG progressively enhanced (p less than 0.05) P secretion to 613% of control levels at Day 8 of culture. In contrast, hPRL significantly increased P secretion (163% of control levels, p less than 0.05) between Day 2-4 of culture, but the stimulatory effect diminished thereafter. The data indicate that dispersed luteal cells from the cynomolgus monkey provide a suitable model for in vitro studies on the primate corpus luteum during the menstrual cycle, pregnancy, and the puerperium, including further investigation of the possible roles of gonadotropin and PRL in the regulation of luteal function in primates.     

Effects of high density lipoprotein containing high or low beta-carotene concentrations on progesterone production and beta-carotene uptake and depletion by bovine luteal cells

Luteal cells were isolated from mid-luteal heifer ovaries by collagenase digestion. Cells were cultured with DMEM/Ham's F12 medium in serum pre-treated plastic culture dishes for periods of up to 11 days. As beta-carotene is almost completely insoluble in all polar solvents, it was added to cultures in either dimethyl sulphoxide (DMSO), tetrahydrofuran (THF) or as high-density lipoprotein (HDL) containing high or low beta-carotene concentrations. Medium was replaced after 24 h, thereafter medium was changed every 48 h. Treatment of cells with DMSO alone or with beta-carotene (5 micromol/l) in DMSO both resulted in significant (P<0.01) stimulation of progesterone production. beta-Carotene (5 micromol/l) in THF did not alter progesterone production but 50 micromol/l beta-carotene in THF resulted in significant inhibition (P<0.02) of progesterone production on days 3 and 7. Cultures were also supplemented with bovine HDL preparations containing equal concentrations of cholesterol (25 microg/ml) but high or low beta-carotene (12.4 or 0.44 microg/mg of cholesterol). Both HDL preparations significantly stimulated progesterone production (P<0. 001) but the high beta-carotene HDL was significantly (P<0.02) more effective than the low beta-carotene HDL. However, when given together with bovine luteinizing hormone (bLH) or dibutyryl cAMP (dbcAMP), the high beta-carotene HDL stimulated progesterone production less than did the low HDL (P<0.01). Uptake and depletion of beta-carotene by luteal cells were also examined in culture. beta-Carotene supplementation increased luteal cell beta-carotene from an initial level of 373 ng per 10(6) cells to 2030 ng per 10(6) cells by day 6. In contrast, the levels in control cells decreased to 14% of starting values during the same period. Cells treated with HDL containing high beta-carotene on day 1 or days 1 and 3 were then incubated with or without bLH or dbcAMP for a further 2 days to investigate the effect of bLH and dbcAMP on depletion of beta-carotene by luteal cells. beta-Carotene depletion in the luteal cells was significantly higher (P<0.05) in LH- and dbcAMP-treated cells than in the control cells in both groups. These results indicate that the use of solvents such as DMSO or THF may have undesirable effects due to alteration of cell membrane permeability. Supplementation with bLH or dbcAMP may increase the metabolism of beta-carotene in luteal cells. bLH or dbcAMP together with high beta-carotene HDL may, when combined with the effect of increased beta-carotene metabolism, give less stimulation than with low beta-carotene HDL.     

Luteal progesterone synthesis and high-density lipoprotein. Evidence implicating a pronase-sensitive HDL-binding site in the mechanism by which HDL supports luteal progesterone synthesis

We have shown previously that corpus luteum cells isolated from the superovulated ovaries of rats treated with 4-amino-pyrazolo[3,4-d]pyrimidine constitute a suitable experimental system by which to investigate the mechanism in which plasma high-density lipoprotein (HDL) plays a role in luteal cellular progesterone synthesis. In the present study, the rate of luteal cellular progesterone synthesis was shown to be stimulated by 125I-labelled HDL up to about 70% of the rate achieved in the presence of native HDL. The concentration of HDL needed for half-maximal stimulation of progesterone synthesis in the presence of lutropin was not significantly different irrespective of whether radioiodinated HDL or unlabelled HDL was used. Experimental conditions for studying the binding of 125I-labelled HDL to isolated luteal cells have been defined and cellular binding affinity and binding capacity have been measured. Exposure of the luteal cells to pronase virtually abolished their capacity to bind 125I-HDL and made them unable to respond to added HDL by increasing their rate of progesterone synthesis in the presence of lutropin. Control experiments showed this effect of pronase on cellular progesterone synthesis not to be due to destruction of cellular lutropin receptors, nor to general cellular damage. This evidence supports the view that luteal cellular binding of HDL is part of the mechanism by which HDL acts in luteal progesterone synthesis. Cellular binding capacity and affinity for 125I-labelled HDL were the same irrespective of whether or not lutropin was present during incubation. Furthermore, the binding capacity and affinity of cells from the ovaries of rats not treated with 4-amino-pyrazolo[3,4-d]pyrimidine were the same as in luteal cells isolated from rats that had been treated.     

Regulation of steroidogenesis and cholesterol synthesis by prostaglandin F-2 alpha and lipoproteins in bovine luteal cells

Bovine luteal cells can utilize low density lipoprotein (LDL) or high density lipoprotein (HDL) as a source of cholesterol for steroidogenesis, and administration of PGF-2 alpha in vitro suppresses lipoprotein utilization. The objective of this study was to examine the mechanism by which PGF-2 alpha exerts this effect. Cultured bovine luteal cells received 0.25 microCi[14C]acetate/ml, to assess rates of de-novo sterol and steroid synthesis, with or without lipoproteins. Both LDL and HDL enhanced progesterone production (P less than 0.01), but caused a significant reduction in the amount of radioactivity in the cholesterol fraction. PGF-2 alpha treatment inhibited the increase in lipoprotein-induced progesterone synthesis (P less than 0.01), but did not prevent the reduction in de-novo cholesterol synthesis brought about by LDL or HDL. PGF-2 alpha alone reduced cholesterol synthesis (P less than 0.01), but it was not as effective as either LDL or HDL. Both lipoproteins and PGF-2 alpha also decreased the amount of radioactivity in the progesterone fraction (P less than 0.01), and the effect of PGF-2 alpha was similar to that of the lipoproteins. It is concluded that lipoproteins can enhance progesterone production and also suppress de-novo cholesterol synthesis in bovine luteal cells, but only the former effect of lipoproteins is inhibited by PGF-2 alpha. Therefore, it is suggested that PGF-2 alpha allows entry of lipoprotein cholesterol into the cell, but prevents utilization for steroidogenesis. In addition, PGF-2 alpha alone can suppress cholesterol synthesis, as well as decrease conversion of cholesterol to progesterone.     

Use of low-density and high-density lipoproteins in undifferentiated porcine granulosa cells

Granulosa cells aspirated from medium-sized porcine ovarian follicles (3-5 mm) in short-term incubation responded to the addition of both low-density lipoprotein (LDL) and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) with increased accumulation of progesterone. HDL was more potent than LDL in enhancing progesterone secretion. When granulosa cells were cultured under serum-free conditions for 72 h, HDL but not LDL exhibited a dose-dependent enhancement of progesterone secretion. Addition of insulin to the cells greatly potentiated the stimulatory effect of LDL on progesterone accumulation, while the response to HDL was only slightly increased. Granulosa cells in culture degraded LDL but not HDL. Addition of insulin enhanced LDL degradation. Exposure of cells in culture to chloroquine, an inhibitor of lysosomal function, completely blocked LDL degradation and LDL-induced stimulation of steroidogenesis. The stimulatory effect of HDL was not affected by chloroquine. We interpret these findings to indicate that granulosa cells derive cholesterol from LDL by means of lysosomal degradation, which is not required for use of cholesterol from HDL. Monensin, a carboxylic ionophore that interrupts recycling of LDL receptors, prevented LDL-enhanced progesterone accumulation but not HDL-induced stimulation. This provides evidence that HDL-induced stimulation of steroidogenesis does not involve LDL receptors. We conclude that HDL present in follicular fluid is capable of providing cholesterol to granulosa cells for steroidogenesis. The stimulatory effect of HDL is not due to the presence of apoprotein E, an HDL component that binds to the LDL receptor. A unique HDL pathway that does not involve LDL receptors and lysosomal degradation may operate in porcine granulosa cells.     

Modulation of cyclic AMP formation and progesterone secretion by human chorionic gonadotropin, epinephrine, buserelin and prostaglandins in normal or human chorionic gonadotropin desensitized rat immature luteal cells in monolayer culture

It is now well recognized that hCG-induced luteolysis is associated with hCG-induced desensitization, but the physiological significance of luteal cell GnRH, PGs and beta-receptors is still undefined. Therefore, we intend in this study to observe the effects of prostaglandin F2 alpha and prostaglandin E2 and the interactions between epinephrine, a potent LHRH agonist [(D-Ser-(TBu)6, des-Gly-NH10(2) LHRH ethylamide: Buserelin] and hCG in normal and in vitro hCG-desensitized rat immature luteal cells in monolayer culture, on basal, hCG or cholera toxin stimulated intracellular and extracellular cAMP and progesterone secretion. The present report shows that incubation of immature rat luteal cells in monolayer culture with Buserelin, led to 25-50% inhibition of the epinephrine-as well as PGE2-induced cAMP and progesterone responses. The LHRH agonist can also reverse the stimulatory effects of cholera toxin in the presence of hCG and led with PGF2 alpha, to additive inhibitory effects on extracellular cAMP accumulation induced by cholera toxin. Both Buserelin and PGF2 alpha can reverse the hCG-induced cAMP and progesterone release but no effect could be observed when the incubation was carried out with either substance in the absence of hCG. Prostaglandin E2, in acute conditions of incubation, seems to share agonist properties with hCG when both were incubated with luteal cells. Buserelin reversed the stimulatory effects of PGE2, hCG, epinephrine and cholera toxin on cAMP and progesterone responses to these substances. These results suggest that Buserelin and PGF2 alpha have luteolytic-like effects and that there may be a complementary action for the two substances. Preincubation of rat luteal cells in monolayer culture with 1 nM hCG for a 24 h period led to the inhibition of cAMP and progesterone responses after a subsequent exposure to hCG and epinephrine. Luteal cells were no longer responsive to hCG while the presence of epinephrine in hCG-desensitized cells led to a 40% stimulation of cAMP and progesterone production. These observations suggest that occurred a partial alteration of the N component activity of the adenylyl cyclase system.     

Relationship between luteinizing hormone and decidual luteotropin in the maintenance of luteal steroidogenesis

Between Days 6-11 of pregnancy or pseudopregnancy, the decidual tissue of the rat produces a prolactin-like hormone, decidual luteotropin, which can sustain luteal progesterone production when prolactin is suppressed. However, this effect is dependent upon the presence of the pituitary. The present investigation was undertaken to determine whether decidual luteotropin and luteinizing hormone (LH) act together to sustain luteal steroidogenesis and if so, to find out whether the need for LH is due to the inability of the decidual tissue to produce LH-like material and/or whether LH affects decidual luteotropin production. Pseudopregnant rats with or without decidual tissue were hypophysectomized on Day 8 and treated with either 1.5 IU human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG)/day or with vehicle. Within 24 h, serum progesterone dropped in both vehicle-treated groups and decidual luteotropin levels declined by 80% in the decidual tissue. Human CG administration had no effect on progesterone production in the control group. Yet in rats with decidual tissue, hCG stimulated progesterone production for at least 48 h and maintained the decidual tissue content of decidual luteotropin. Progesterone, but not hCG treatment, maintained decidual luteotropin concentrations in ovariectomized rats. To compare the luteotropic activity of the decidual tissue with that of the placenta, pregnant or pseudopregnant rats with decidual tissue were hypophysectomized on Day 8 and treated with 1.5 IU hCG. Control groups had decidual tissue or placentas removed and were similarly treated. Human CG stimulated progesterone production only in rats with placental or decidual tissue.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Steroidogenic effects of lipoproteins and 25-hydroxycholesterol on luteal and ovarian cells: a comparison of two pseudopregnant rat models

Steroidogenesis was compared between luteal cells from immature pseudopregnant (PSP) rats induced by either 5 IU pregnant mare serum gonadotropin (PMSG) alone or 50 IU PMSG combined with 25 IU human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG). It was also determined whether differences in steroidogenesis existed when the entire ovary (ovarian cells) or just luteal cells from Day 4 PSP rats were exposed in vitro to lipoproteins or 25-hydroxycholesterol (25-OH chol). In the absence of luteinizing hormone (LH), basal steroid accumulation, especially progesterone (P4) was around fourfold greater in luteal cells from rats treated with PMSG alone than from rats receiving PMSG-hCG. However, serum P4 and LH were about fivefold greater in the latter group. It is therefore likely that net cellular cholesterol uptake per luteal cell is lower in the PMSG-hCG treated rats, but this is offset by a much greater mass and number of corpora lutea. Lipoproteins (HDL and LDL) and 25-OH chol stimulated in vitro luteal steroidogenesis from rats treated with PMSG alone or PMSG-hCG, and their responses were virtually identical. Therefore, luteal steroidogenesis in the rat always depends on exogenous cholesterol even though treatment in the preovulatory period with PMS or PMSG-hCG and serum LH and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) levels on Day 4 PSP are very different. When ovarian cells from PMSG-hCG treated rats were incubated with LH plus HDL or 25-OHP, the production of 20 alpha-DHP was considerably greater than luteal cell production which may be due to a contribution from nonluteal cells. Indeed, about 30% of the cells in the PMSG-hCG group represent nonluteal components as estimated by weight and deoxyribonucleic acid content.     

Differential steroidogenic responses of ovine luteal cells to ovine luteinizing hormone and human chorionic gonadotropin

Experiments were conducted in vitro on ovine small luteal cells to evaluate their steroidogenic response to ovine luteinizing hormone (oLH) and human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) administered continuously throughout the experimental period or as a 15-min pulse. Both oLH and hCG stimulated a significant increase in progesterone secretion (P less than 0.001) by small luteal cells. Human chorionic gonadotropin administered continuously or as a pulse maintained progesterone secretion at 40-55% of experimental maximum at least 6 hr while oLH-stimulated progesterone secretion declined to basal levels by 4 hr after a 15-min pulse or declined to 25% of the experimental maximum within 6 hr under constant stimulation. The responses of small luteal cells to oLH and hCG were found to differ (P less than 0.001). The sustained progesterone secretion of luteal cells in response to a pulse of hCG may be due to longer residence of occupied receptor complex on the cell membrane. In contrast, the decline in oLH stimulated progesterone secretion, even when hormone is continuously present in the medium, may be related to a rapid internalization of receptor-hormone complexes and down-regulation of receptors.     

Do small and large luteal cells of the sheep interact in the production of progesterone?

Corpora lutea from cyclic ewes were dissociated by collagenase and trypsin/EGTA treatments, and enriched fractions of small and large luteal cells were prepared on gradients of Ficoll. These fractions were incubated separately or remixed before incubation. Colchicine, cytochalasin B and the calcium channel-blocker verapamil significantly reduced progesterone production by both small and large luteal cell fractions, while isoprenaline stimulated an increase in progesterone production by large luteal cell fractions only. When fractions of small and large luteal cells were remixed, no more and no less progesterone was produced than would have been predicted from equivalent fractions incubated separately. There was therefore no evidence of synergism between small and large luteal cells in the production of progesterone. Prostaglandin F-2 alpha, which can inhibit LH-stimulated progesterone production by ovine luteal tissue in vitro, had no effect on LH-stimulated progesterone production by small luteal cell fractions, but significantly inhibited that by enriched fractions of large luteal cells. Since large luteal cell fractions were contaminated with small luteal cells, which are probably responsible for the progesterone-secretory response of these fractions to LH, it was concluded that the inhibition of LH-stimulated progesterone production by small luteal cells is dependent on the presence of large luteal cells. Oxytocin added to large and small luteal cell fractions did not affect progesterone production by either fraction. It was therefore concluded that the inhibitory action of PGF-2 alpha on LH-stimulated progesterone production may require the interaction of large and small luteal cells, but that oxytocin is not likely to be an intermediary in this interaction.     

In-vitro and in-vivo responsiveness of the corpus luteum of the mare to gonadotrophin stimulation

Dispersed horse luteal cells were used to evaluate the ability of horse LH, hCG and PMSG to stimulate progesterone secretion in vitro. Morphological characterization of these cells before gonadotrophin stimulation indicated the presence of two populations of cells based on cell diameters. In luteal cells incubated as suspended cells, horse LH and hCG stimulated (P less than or equal to 0.05) progesterone production at all levels of treatment. Stimulation of progesterone secretion by hCG was greater (P less than or equal to 0.05) than by horse LH over the range of concentrations utilized. When mares (N = 7) received an intramuscular injection of 1000 i.u. hCG on Days 3, 4 and 5 after the end of oestrus, there was an increase (P less than or equal to 0.05), in peripheral progesterone concentrations beginning on Day 7 and continuing until Day 14 compared with controls (N = 7). Peripheral progesterone concentrations continued to be elevated in hCG-treated mares for Days 15-30 after oestrus in those mares that conceived. Although treatment with hCG increased progesterone concentrations, it had no influence on anterior pituitary release of LH as measured by frequency and amplitude of LH discharge. We conclude that the mare corpus luteum is responsive to gonadotrophins in vitro and that exogenous hCG can enhance serum progesterone concentrations throughout the oestrous cycle and early pregnancy.     

Role of prostaglandin E2 in basal and noradrenaline-induced progesterone secretion by the bovine corpus luteum

The role of prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) in basal and noradrenaline (NA)-stimulated utilization of high density lipoprotein (HDL) as a source of cholesterol for progesterone synthesis was examined. In Experiment 1, a cannula was inserted into the aorta abdominalis through the coccygeal artery (cranial to the origin of the ovarian artery) in mature heifers, to facilitate infusion of NA (4 mg/30 min; n = 3) on day 10 of the estrous cycle. Three other heifers were similarly cannulated to serve as control. Before, during, and after NA or saline infusion, blood samples from the vena cava were collected every 5-15 min for analysis of PGE2, progesterone, and cholesterol. Each NA infusion stimulated (P < 0.01) secretion of both hormones in heifers. Short-duration increases (P < 0.05) in progesterone were observed due to the infusion of NA while cholesterol was not altered significantly. In addition, increases in PGE2 concentrations (P < 0.05) compared to controls were seen after NA infusion. Therefore, we used an in vitro model to verify the effect of PGE2 on HDL utilization by luteal cells from day 5 to 10 of the estrous cycle. In the preliminary experiment, 10(-6) M of PGE2 out of four different doses examined was selected for further studies, since it evoked the highest release of progesterone. In the next experiment, it was found that HDL increases progesterone secretion by luteal cells and both PGE2 and LH increased (P < 0.05) the response to HDL while NA did not. In the last in vitro experiment, progesterone stimulated PGE2 secretion by luteal cells. In conclusion, PGE2 may be directly involved in the utilization of cholesterol from HDL for progesterone synthesis. Furthermore, PGE2 may influence NA-stimulated progesterone secretion by the corpus luteum (CL). It is concluded that there is a positive feedback loop between progesterone and luteal PGE2 during days 5-10 of the estrous cycle.