Identification of close contacts between the sigma N (sigma 54) protein and promoter DNA in closed promoter complexes.

The complexes forming between the alternative sigma factor protein sigma N (sigma 54), its holoenzyme and promoter DNA were analysed using the hydroxyl radical probe and by photochemical footprinting of bromouridine-substituted DNA. Close contacts between the promoter, sigma N and its holoenzyme appear to be restricted predominantly to one face of the DNA helix, extending from -31 to -5. They all appear attributable to sigma N and no extra close contacts from the core RNA polymerase subunits in the holoenzyme-promoter DNA complex were detected. We suggest that the apparent absence of close core RNA polymerase contacts in the region of the promoter DNA to be melted during open complex formation is important for maintaining the closed complex. Results of the hydroxyl radical footprinting imply that sigma N makes multiple DNA backbone contacts across and beyond the -12, -24 consensus promoter elements, and the photochemical footprints indicate that consensus thymidine residues contribute important major groove contacts to sigma N. Formation of the open complex is shown to involve a major structural transition in the DNA contacted by sigma N, establishing a direct role for sigma N in formation of the activated promoter complex.     

The conserved R166 residue of ALDH5A (succinic semialdehyde dehydrogenase) has multiple functional roles

ALDH5 (aka succinic semialdehyde dehydrogenase) is a NAD(+)-dependent aldehyde dehydrogenase crucial for the proper removal of the GABA metabolite succinic semialdehyde (SSA). All known ALDH5 family members contain the conserved amino acid sequence "MITRK". Our studies of rat ALDH5A indicate that residue R166 in this sequence may play a role in the substrate specificity of ALDH5A for the gamma-carboxylated succinic semialdehyde versus other aliphatic and aromatic aldehydes including acetaldehyde and benzaldehyde. We tested the hypothesis that the R166 residue regulates aldehyde specificity by utilizing rat ALDH5A wild-type (R166wt) and R166K, R166H, R166A, and R166E mutants. The V(MAX) using SSA fell whereas the K(M) for SSA increased for all mutants analyzed yielding k(cat)/K(M) (s(-1)/microM) ratios of 52.3 (R166wt), 5.5 (R166K), 0.01 (R166H), 0.008 (R166E), and 0.004 (R166A). Utilization of acetaldehyde by the R166H mutant was similar to R166wt with k(cat)/K(M)'s of 0.003 and 0.002, respectively. Almost no activity towards acetaldehyde was noted for the R166E and R166A mutants. Unexpectedly, the K(M) for NAD(+) changed: 21 microM (R166wt), 81 microM (R166K), 63 microM (R166H), 35 microM (R166E) and 44 microM (R166A). As release of NADH can be a rate-limiting step for ALDH activity, NADH binding was evaluated for R166wt and R166H enzymes. The K(D) of NADH for R166H (0.9 microM) was 11-fold less than that of ALDH5A wt (10.3 microM) and possibly explains the increase in the K(M) for NAD(+). Furthermore, data using R166K and R166H mutants demonstrate that inhibition of enzyme activity by low pH is regulated in part by the R166 residue. Our data indicate that the R166 residue of ALDH5A regulates multiple enzymatic functions.     

In vitro binding study of adaptor protein complex (AP-1) to lysosomal targeting motif (LI-motif)

Lysosomal membrane glycoproteins carry targeting information in cytoplasmic regions. Two distinct targeting motifs in these regions, GY (glycine-tyrosine) and LI (leucine-isoleucine), have been identified and characterized. Accumulating evidence suggests that the adaptor complexes (AP-1, AP-2, and AP-3) recognize this information in cytoplasmic tails of transmembrane proteins. Here we report two different in vitro analyses (affinity beads and surface plasmon resonance) which revealed specific interaction between the cytoplasmic tail of LGP85 and AP-1 but not so with AP-2. We also noted requirement of the LI motif of the LGP85 tail in binding to the AP-1 complex. Our data and others which indicated the binding of AP-3 to the LIMP II (synonym of LGP85) tail suggest that the cytoplasmic tail of LGP85 interacts with AP-1 at the trans-Golgi network (TGN) and AP-3 at late endosomes, respectively. We propose that this sequential interaction between the lysosomal targeting signal and distinct APs along its transport pathway is responsible for the critical sorting of lysosomal membrane proteins and/or the potential proofreading system of mistargeted molecules.     

Open complex formation in vitro by sigma38 (rpoS) RNA polymerase: roles for region 2 amino acids

Non-functional mutants of sigma(38)(sigma(S)) were studied in vitro to identify the nature of their defects. Mutations in four amino acids led to severe defects in DNA binding and enzyme isomerization with promoter fork junction probes containing single-stranded non-template DNA. The same properties were previously seen with DNA mutations at the fork junction, implying that sigma:DNA interactions at the fork junction are used both for DNA binding and enzyme isomerization. An overlapping set of four mutants had defects that appear to be associated with DNA melting to create the fork junction. When mapped onto the sigma(70) structure, these groups of mutants suggest motifs used by sigma factors to melt DNA and isomerize RNA polymerase to form functional open promoter complexes.     

Cloning and characterization of the gene encoding RNA polymerase sigma factor sigma(54) of deep-sea piezophilic Shewanella violacea

We have recently reported that a sigma(54)-like factor recognizes a DNA element, designated as region A, upstream of a pressure-regulated operon in piezophilic Shewanella violacea strain DSS12 (Nakasone et al., FEMS Microbiology Lett. 176 (1999) 351-356). In this study, we isolated and characterized the rpoN gene of this piezophilic bacterium. The rpoN gene was found to encode a putative protein consisting of 492 amino acid residues with a predicted molecular mass of 55359 Da. Significant homology was evident comparing the rpoN sequence of S. violacea with that of Escherichia coli (62.8% identity), Vibrio anguillarum (61.7% identity) and Pseudomonas putida (57.0% identity). The DNA-binding domain at the C-terminus of sigma(54) is well conserved in the case of the S. violacea rpoN gene product and the helix-turn-helix motif and the RpoN box are also present. In addition, the conserved glutamine-rich domain is present at the N-terminus. sigma(54) in S. violacea was expressed at a relatively constant level under various growth conditions as determined by both primer extension and Western blotting analyses. By means of a recombinant plasmid, a hexahistidine-tagged derivative of the sigma(54) from strain DSS12 was overexpressed in Escherichia coli and purified to near homogeneity. An electrophoretic mobility shift assay demonstrated that the purified sigma(54) protein specifically recognizes region A in the above-mentioned pressure-regulated operon.     

Two forms of N intermediate (N(open) and N(closed)) in the bacteriorhodopsin photocycle.

Glutaraldehyde, aluminum ions and glycerol (that inhibit the M intermediate decay in the wild-type bacteriorhodopsin and azide-induced M decay in the D96N mutant by stabilization of the M(closed)) accelerate the N decay in the D96N mutant. The aluminum ions, the most potent activator of the N decay, induce a blue shift of the N difference spectrum by approximately 10 nm. Protonated azide as well as acetate and formate inhibit the N decay in both the D96N mutant and the wild-type protein. It is concluded that the N intermediate represents, in fact, an equilibrium mixture of the two ('open' and 'closed') forms. These two forms, like M(closed) and M(open), come to an equilibrium in the microseconds range. The absorption spectrum of the N(open) is slightly shifted to red in comparison to that of the N(closed). Again, this resembles the M forms. 13-cis-all-trans re-isomerization is assumed to occur in the N(closed) form only. Binding of 1-2 molecules of protonated azide stabilizes the N(open) form. Existence of the 'open' and 'closed' forms of the M and N intermediates provides the appropriate explanation of the cooperative phenomenon as well as some other effects on the bacteriorhodopsin photocycle. Summarizing the available data, we suggest that M(open) is identical to the M(N) form, whereas M1 and M2 are different substates of M(closed).