Homoiogenetic Neural Induction in Xenopus Chimeric Explants

We previously raised monoclonal antibodies specific for epidermis (7) and neural tissue (8) of Xenopus for use as markers of tissue differentiation in induction experiments (8). Here we have used these monoclonal antibodies to examine homoiogenetic neural induction, by which cells induced to differentiate to neural tissues can in turn induce competent ectoderm to do the same. Presumptive anterior neural plate excised from late gastrulae of Xenopus laevis was conjugated with competent ectoderm from the initial gastrula of Xenopus borealis , either side by side or with their inner surfaces together. The chimeric explants enabled us to distinguish induced neural tissues from inducing neural tissues. In both types of explant, neural tissues identified by the neural tissue-specific antibody, NEU-1, were induced in the competent ectoderm by the presumptive anterior neural plate. The results suggest that homoiogenetic neural induction does occur in Xenopus embryos.     

Effects of Inducers on Inner and Outer Gastrula Ectoderm Layers of Xenopus laevis

Abstract. Gastrula ectoderm, isolated from Xenopus laevis , was cultured in Holtfreter solution or modified Leibovitz medium (L-15) by the sandwich-method with or without inducer. The ectoderm (SD cell layers) consists of two cell sheets, representing a superficial (S) and a deep (D) layer. In the L-15 medium rather than in Holtfreter solution, the two cell layers separate out into distinct cell masses. This difference in cell affinity under certain experimental conditions could indicate that the deep layer contains endodermal cells. However, an endodermal character of the deep layer can be ruled out by induction experiments with vegetalizing factor or dorsal blastopore lip as inducers. Under the influence of vegetalizing factor the outer as well as the inner ectoderm layer differentiated into mesodermal derivatives such as notochord and somites. The results of the experiments with dorsal blastopore lip as inducer indicate that both inner and outer ectoderm layers are responsive to the neural stimulus. The lower neural competence of the outer ectoderm layer observed by several authors in normogenesis is discussed with regard to the hypothesis about short distance diffusion of the neuralizing factor and/or close cell-to-cell contact between inducing tissue and ectodermal target cells.     

Effect of concanavalin A and vegetalizing factor on the outer and inner ectoderm layers of early gastrulae of Xenopus laevis after treatment with cytochalasin B

Neural (archencephalic) structures have been evoked in the competent ectoderm (consisting of both ectodermal layers) of Xenopus laevis by treatment with Concanavalin A (Con A), which probably acts on the plasma membrane. The size of the neural structures is increased when the ectoderm is incubated in Cytochalasin B prior to the Con A treatment. The results indicate that Cytochalasin B could have an influence on the binding of Con A to receptors on the plasma membrane. On the other hand, Cytochalasin B seems to have an inhibitory effect on the action of the vegetalizing factor, which could be correlated with the decline of endocytotic processes and internalization. In further series, it could be shown that the isolated superficial ectoderm, in contrast to the inner ectoderm layer, does not react to Con A treatment with the differentiation of neural structures. Studies with FITC-Con A indicate that the marker binds less to the outer ectoderm than to the inner ectoderm layer. However, by xenoplastic combinations of the outer ectoderm layer of X. laevis as reacting tissue and chordamesoderm of Triturus vulgaris as inducer, it could be demonstrated that the superficial layer, which is normogenesis does not come into contact with the inducing chordamesoderm but forms the ependymal part of the brain only, is also able to form archencephalic brain structures under in vitro conditions.     

Epithelial Cell Wedging and Neural Trough Formation Are Induced Planarly inXenopus,without Persistent Vertical Interactions with Mesoderm

In this study we investigate the induction of the cell behaviors underlying neurulation in the frog,Xenopus laevis.Although planar signals from the organizer can induce convergent extension movements of the posterior neural tissue in explants, the remaining morphogenic processes of neurulation do not appear to occur in absence of vertical interactions with the organizer (R. Kelleret al.,1992,Dev. Dyn.193, 218–234). These processes include: (1) cell elongation perpendicular to the plane of the epithelium, forming the neural plate; (2) cell wedging, which rolls the neural plate into a trough; (3) intercalation of two layers of neural plate cells to form one layer; and (4) fusion of the neural folds. To allow planar signaling between all the inducing tissues of the involuting marginal zone and the responding prospective ectoderm, we have designed a “giant sandwich” explant. In these explants, cell elongation and wedging are induced in the superficial neural layer by planar signals without persistent vertical interactions with underlying, involuted mesoderm. A neural trough forms, and neural folds form and approach one another. However, the neural folds do not fuse with one another, and the deep cells of these explants do not undergo their normal behaviors of elongation, wedging, and intercalation between the superficial neural cells, even when planar signals are supplemented with vertical signaling until the late midgastrula (stage 11.5). Vertical interactions with mesoderm during and beyond the late gastrula stage were required for expression of these deep cell behaviors and for neural fold fusion. These explants offer a way to regulate deep and superficial cell behaviors and thus make possible the analysis of the relative roles of these behaviors in closing the neural tube.     

Mesoderm and Neural Inductions on Newt Ectoderm by Activin A

Mesoderm-inducing activity of human recombinant activin A was examined on presumptive ectoderm of the Japanese newt, Cynops pyrrhogaster , by using the animal cap assay, Activin A induced neural tissues and mesodermal tissues such as brain, neural tube, notochord, muscle, mesenchyme, coelomic epithelium and blood-like cells after 14 days cultivation. These tissues were induced by activin A at concentrations ranging from 0.5– 100 ng/ml. Dose-dependent inducing activity of activity A on newt ectoderm was slightly different from that on other animals, including Xenopus . Wide range of concentration of activin A (0.5– 100 ng/ml) could induce the neural tube, notochord, mesenchyme and coelomic epithelium on the newt ectoderm. Though the percentage of induced explants (two out of 23 explants, 8.7%) was low, the pulsating heart was induced. This paper showed first that activin could induce the mesodermal and neural tissues in newt presumptive ectoderm. Since activin homologues were present In Xenopus and chick embryos, it is likely that activin may be one of the natural inducers in a wide range of species.     

Early tissue interactions leading to embryonic lens formation in Xenopus laevis

Our previous research has demonstrated that lens induction in Xenopus laevis requires inductive interactions prior to contact with the optic vesicle, which classically had been thought to be the major lens inductor. The importance of these early interactions has been verified by demonstrating that lens ectoderm is specified by the time it comes into contact with the optic vesicle. It has been argued that the tissues which underlie the presumptive lens ectoderm during gastrulation and neurulation, dorsolateral endoderm and mesoderm, are the primary early inductors. We show here, however, that these tissues alone cannot elicit lens formation in Xenopus ectoderm. Evidence is presented that presumptive anterior neural plate tissue (which includes the early eye rudiment) is an essential early lens inductor in Xenopus. The presence of dorsolateral mesoderm appears to enhance this response. These findings support a model in which an essential inductive signal passes through the plane of ectoderm during gastrula and early neurula stages from presumptive anterior neural tissue to the presumptive lens ectoderm. Since there is evidence for such interactions within a tissue layer in mesodermal and neural induction as well, this may be a general feature of the initial stages of determination of many tissues.     

Neural crest development in the Xenopus laevis embryo, studied by interspecific transplantation and scanning electron microscopy

The Xenopus borealis quinacrine marker and scanning electron microscopy have been used to study the appearance, migration, and homing of neural crest cells in the embryo of Xenopus. The analysis shows that the primordium of the neural crest develops from the nervous layer of the ectoderm and consists of three segments at early neurula stages. This primordium is located in the lateral halves of the neural folds behind the prospective eye vesicles. The histological and experimental evidence shows that the neural crest cells also originate from the medial portion of the neural folds. The neural crest segments in the cephalic region start to migrate just before the closure of the neural tube. Isotopic and isochronic unilateral grafts of X. borealis neural crest into X. laevis embryos were performed in order to map the fate of the cranial crest segments and the vagal-truncal neural crest. The analysis of the X. laevis host embryos shows that the mandibular crest segment contributes to the lower jaw (Meckel's cartilage), quadrate, and ethmoid-trabecular cartilages, as well as to the ganglionic and Schwann cells of the trigeminus nerve, the connective tissues, the mesenchymal and choroid layers of the eye, and the cornea. The hyoid crest segment is located in the ceratohyal cartilage and in ganglia VII and VIII. The branchial crest segment migrates from the caudal part of the otic vesicle and divides into two portions which contribute to the cartilages of the gills. The vagal-truncal neural crest starts to migrate later at stage 25. It migrates by means of the vagus complex in a ventral direction and penetrates into the splanchnic layer of the digestive tract. The trunk neural crest cells disperse into three different pathways which differ from those of the avian embryo at this level.     

Pattern and morphogenesis of presumptive superficial mesoderm in two closely related species, Xenopus laevis and Xenopus tropicalis

The mesoderm, comprising the tissues that come to lie entirely in the deep layer, originates in both the superficial epithelial and the deep mesenchymal layers of the early amphibian embryo. Here, we characterize the mechanisms by which the superficial component of the presumptive mesoderm ingresses into the underlying deep mesenchymal layer in Xenopus tropicalis and extend our previous findings for Xenopus laevis. Fate mapping the superficial epithelium of pregastrula stage embryos demonstrates ingression of surface cells into both paraxial and axial mesoderm (including hypochord), in similar patterns and amounts in both species. Superficial presumptive notochord lies medially, flanked by presumptive hypochord and both overlie the deep region of the presumptive notochord. These tissues are flanked laterally by superficial presumptive somitic mesoderm, the anterior tip of which also appears to overlay the presumptive deep notochord. Time-lapse recordings show that presumptive somitic and notochordal cells move out of the roof of the gastrocoel and into the deep region during neurulation, whereas hypochordal cells ingress after neurulation. Scanning electron microscopy at the stage and position where ingression occurs suggests that superficial presumptive somitic cells in X. laevis ingress into the deep region as bottle cells whereas those in X. tropicalis ingress by "relamination" (e.g., [Dev. Biol. 174 (1996) 92]). In both species, the superficially derived presumptive somitic cells come to lie in the medial region of the presumptive somites during neurulation. By the early tailbud stages, these cells lie at the horizontal myoseptum of the somites. The morphogenic pathway of these cells strongly resembles that of the primary slow muscle pioneer cells of the zebrafish. We present a revised fate map of Xenopus, and we discuss the conservation of superficial mesoderm within amphibians and across the chordates and its implications for the role of this tissue in patterning the mesoderm.     

Covalent coupling of neuralizing factors from Xenopus to Sepharose beads: no decrease of inducing activity

Two neural inducing factors extracted from Xenopus gastrulae, a basic protein from ribonucleoprotein particles and an acidic protein from the high speed supernatant were covalently bound to CNBr-Sepharose or cross-linked CNBr-Sepharose particles. The protein-Sepharose complexes cannot be taken up by the competent ectoderm cells, but both factors remain fully active. The inducing activity is not due to a release of the bound factors. The experiments suggest that both neural inducing factors act on the cell surface of the competent ectoderm cells.     

Endoderm differentiation and inductive effect of activin-treated ectoderm in Xenopus

When presumptive ectoderm is treated with high concentrations of activin A, it mainly differentiates into axial mesoderm (notochord, muscle) in Xenopus and into yolk-rich endodermal cells in newt (Cynops pyrrhogaster). Xenopus ectoderm consists of multiple layers, different from the single layer of Cynops ectoderm. This multilayer structure of Xenopus ectoderm may prevent complete treatment of activin A and subsequent whole differentiation into endoderm. In the present study, therefore, Xenopus ectoderm was separated into an outer layer and an inner layer, which were individually treated with a high concentration of activin A (100 ng/mL). Then the differentiation and inductive activity of these ectodermal cells were examined in explantation and transplantation experiments. In isolation culture, ectoderm treated with activin A formed endoderm. Ectodermal and mesodermal tissues were seldom found in these explants. The activin-treated ectoderm induced axial mesoderm and neural tissues, and differentiated into endoderm when it was sandwiched between two sheets of ectoderm or was transplanted into the ventral marginal zone of other blastulae. These findings suggest that Xenopus ectoderm treated with a high concentration of activin A forms endoderm and mimics the properties of the organizer as in Cynops.     

Homeogenetic neural induction in Xenopus

Neural induction is known to involve an interaction of ectoderm with dorsal mesoderm during gastrulation, but several kinds of studies have argued that competent ectoderm can also be neutralized via an interaction with previously neuralized tissue, a process termed homeogenetic neural induction. Although homeogenetic neural induction has been proposed to play an important role in the normal induction of neural tissue, this process has not been subjected to detailed study using tissue recombinants and molecular markers. We have examined the question of homeogenetic neural induction in Xenopus embryos, both in transplant and recombinant experiments, using the expression of two neural antigens to assay the response. When ectoderm that is competent to be neuralized is transplanted to the region adjacent to the neural plate of early neurula embryos, it forms neural tissue, as assayed by staining with antibodies against the neural cell adhesion molecule, N-CAM. Transplants to the ventral region, far from the neural plate, do not express N-CAM, indicating that neuralization is not occurring as a result of the transplantation procedure itself. Because this response might be occurring as a result of interactions of ectoderm with either adjacent neural plate tissue, or with underlying dorsolateral mesoderm, recombinant experiments were performed to determine the source of the neuralizing signal. Ectoderm cultured in combination with neural plate tissue alone expresses neural markers, while ectoderm cultured in combination with dorsolateral mesoderm does not. We conclude that neural tissue can homeogenetically induce competent ectoderm to form neural tissue and argue that this induction occurs via planar signaling within the ectoderm, a mechanism that, in normal development, may be involved in interactions within presumptive neural ectoderm or in specifying structures that lie near the neural plate.     

Mechanisms of Melanophore Induction in Amphibian Development

Induction of melanophores was examined by the sandwich method of explantation with embryonic tissues of Xenopus laevis +/+ and the white mutant, a^P/a^P. Interspecific combinations of tissues of Triturus taeniatus and Xenopus borealis were also used. The ectoderm used as the reacting system was taken from embriyos at various stages and combined with various tissues known to be melanogenic inductors. The following results were obtained: 1) The sources of melanophore induction in both +/+ and a^p/a^p studied by sandwich explantation were the same in both retinal pigmented epithelium and dermal melanophores: 2) Melanophores were induced in epidermal material from embryos at stages from the early gastrula to the late tail bud stage: 3) The presence of melanoblasts together with other ectomesenchymal cells in the neural crest is not sine qua non for their determination and differentiation: 4) On isolation of reacting material from the late gastrula, melanophores appeared in all cases. This shows that two hours contact between inductor tissues and the ectoderm is necessary and sufficient for melanophore induction: 5) Melanophore induction is not species-specific, but occurred in Xenopus ectoderm under the action of endomesoderm of Tr. taeniatus or X. borealis , and vice versa. The shapes and structures of melanophores induced were typical for the species from which the ectoderm was taken: 6) Melanogenic activity in the late gastrula stage has a gradient of distribution with a maximum in the prechordal plate: 7) In the mutant only the primary source of melanogenic inductors, the prechordal plate (PrP1), was active in stages both before and after its invagination: 8) Despite the fact that skin melanophores and retinal melanocytes have different genesis in development, all the present data suggest the identity of the mechanisms of melanin synthesizing machinery in the two.     

Neural induction in embryos

Neural differentiation of the ectoderm is inhibited by bone morphogenetic protein 4 (BMP-4) in amphibia as well as mammalia. This inhibition is released by neural inducing factor(s), which are secreted from the dorsal mesoderm. Masked neuralizing factor(s) are already present in the ectoderm before induction. In homogenates from Xenopus oocytes and embryos neural inducing factors were found in the supernatant (centrifuged at 105 000 g ), in small vesicles and a ribonucleoprotein fraction. A neuralizing factor, which is a protein of small size, has been partially purified from Xenopus gastrulae. Genes that are expressed in the dorsal mesoderm and involved in the de novo synthesis of neuralizing factor(s) have been cloned. The differentiation of cells with a neuronal fate starts in the neural plate immediately after neural induction. Genes homologous to the Notch and Delta genes of lateral inhibition in insects are involved in this process.     

Prospective Neural Areas and their Morphogenetic Movements during Neural Plate Formation in the Xenopus Embryo. II. Disposition of Transplanted Ectoderm Pieces of X. borealis Animal Cap in Prospective Neural Areas of Albino X. laevis gastrulae.

Small pieces of the animal cap of X. borealis gastrulae were transplanted into various regions of the noninvoluting marginal zone of albino X. laevis gastrulae, and the distribution of the donor cells was analyzed by quinacrine fluorescence staining.
The present study indicated that the prospective central nervous system (CNS) lies as a belt-shaped area in the noninvoluting marginal zone of early gastrulae. This belt-shaped prospective neural area extends as far as 0.7 mm (115° to the vegetal pole) above the blastopore in the dorsal midline and 1.3 mm lateral (130° to the dorsal midline) to the dorsal midline. The ectoderm of the dorsal region extends in the animal-vegetal direction and forms the ventral side of the CNS. The dorsalateral and lateral regions converge toward the dorsal midline and extended in the animal-vegetal direction. The former constitutes the lateral side of the anterior CNS, and the latter the dorso-lateral side of the posterior CNS.
The outer layer of ectoderm which was transplanted onto the inner layer of the host gastrula differentiated into neural tissues.
The prospective areas of the CNS and their morphogenetic movement during Xenopus embryogenesis are also discussed with regard to neural induction.     

Electron microscope study of the binding of Con A-gold to superficial and inner ectoderm layers ofXenopus laevis and its relation to the neural-inducing activity of this lectin

Summary Isolated competent amphibian ectoderm differentiates into neural (archencephalic) structures when treated with the plant lectin concanavalin A (Con A). While the inner ectoderm layer ofXenopus laevis forms brain structures after incubation with Con A, the outer ectoderm layer differentiates into ciliated epidermis only. This difference can be correlated with the pattern of Con A bound to the plasma membrane. With gold-labelled Con A it could be shown by transmission electron microscopy (TEM) that the outer ectoderm binds substantially less lectin than the inner layer. Furthermore we observed characteristic differences at the apical and basal surfaces of the cells of the same layer, i.e. on the apical cell surface of the superficial layer almost no Con A-gold could be found. In contrast, we observed a lot of gold particles on the basal cell side of the superficial layer. However, the number on both surfaces (apical and basal side of the cell) of the inner ectoderm layer was essentially higher, which could explain its biological reaction to the Con A stimulus and the differentiation into neural structures. The data presented in this paper indicate that early and late gastrula ectoderm bind similar amounts of Con A and support the view that the decrease in competence is not correlated with a loss of receptors for inducing factors. Furthermore, we describe the binding and the internalization of Con A via receptor-mediated endocytosis and the further fate of the Con A-gold-receptor complex inside the target cell.