Involvement of a Jumonji-C domain-containing histone demethylase in DRM2-mediated maintenance of DNA methylation

Histone demethylases-both lysine-specific demethylase 1 (LSD1) and Jumonji-C (JmjC) domain-containing proteins-are broadly implicated in the regulation of chromatin-dependent processes. In Arabidopsis thaliana, histone marks directly affect DNA methylation, and mutations in LSD1 homologues show reduced DNA methylation at some loci. We screened transfer DNA mutations in genes encoding JmjC domains for defects in DNA methylation. Mutations in jmj14 result in reduced DNA methylation in non-CG contexts at targets of DRM2 (domains rearranged methyltransferase 2)-mediated RNA-directed DNA methylation (RdDM), which is associated with an increase in H3K4m3. Unlike other components of RdDM, JMJ14 is not required for de novo methylation of a transgene, suggesting that JMJ14 is specifically involved in the maintenance phase of DRM2-mediated RdDM.     

Sgs1 function in the repair of DNA replication intermediates is separable from its role in homologous recombinational repair

Mutations in human homologues of the bacterial RecQ helicase cause diseases leading to cancer predisposition and/or shortened lifespan (Werner, Bloom, and Rothmund–Thomson syndromes). The budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae has one RecQ helicase, Sgs1, which functions with Top3 and Rmi1 in DNA repair. Here, we report separation‐of‐function alleles of SGS1 that suppress the slow growth of top3Δ and rmi1Δ cells similar to an SGS1 deletion, but are resistant to DNA damage similar to wild‐type SGS1. In one allele, the second acidic region is deleted, and in the other, only a single aspartic acid residue 664 is deleted. sgs1‐D664Δ, unlike sgs1Δ, neither disrupts DNA recombination nor has synthetic growth defects when combined with DNA repair mutants. However, during S phase, it accumulates replication‐associated X‐shaped structures at damaged replication forks. Furthermore, fluorescent microscopy reveals that the sgs1‐D664Δ allele exhibits increased spontaneous RPA foci, suggesting that the persistent X‐structures may contain single‐stranded DNA. Taken together, these results suggest that the Sgs1 function in repair of DNA replication intermediates can be uncoupled from its role in homologous recombinational repair.     

Functional and physical interaction between Sgs1 and Top3 and Sgs1-independent function of Top3 in DNA recombination repair

A mutant allele of SGS1 of Saccharomyces cerevisiae was identified as a suppressor of the slow-growth phenotype of top3 mutants. We previously reported the involvement of Top3 via the interaction with the N-terminal region of Sgs1 in the complementation of methylmethanesulfonate (MMS) sensitivity and the suppression of hyper recombination of a sgs1 mutant. In this study, we found that several amino acids residues in the N-terminal region of Sgs1 between residues 4 and 33 were responsible for binding to Top3 and essential for complementing the sensitivity to MMS of sgsl cells. Two-hybrid assays suggested that the region of Top3 responsible for the binding to Sgs1 was bipartite, with portion in the N- and C-terminal domains. Although disruption of the SGS1 gene suppressed the semi-lethality of the top3 mutant of strain MR, the sgsl-top3 double mutant grew more slowly and was more sensitive to MMS than the sgsl single mutant, indicating that Top3 plays some role independently of Sgs1. The DNA topoisomerase activity of Top3 was required for the Top3 function to repair DNA damages induced by MMS, as shown by the fact that the TOP3 gene carrying a mutation (Phe for Tyr) at the amino acid residue essential for its activity (residue 356) failed to restore the MMS sensitivity of sgs1-top3 to the level of that of the sgs1 single mutant. Epistatic analysis using the sgs1-top3 double mutant, rad52 mutant and sgs1-top3-rad52 triple mutant indicated that TOP3 belongs to the RAD52 recombinational repair pathway.     

Turnip crinkle virus-encoded suppressor of RNA silencing interacts with Arabidopsis SGS3 to enhance virus infection

Most plant viruses encode suppressors of RNA silencing (VSRs) to protect themselves from antiviral RNA silencing in host plants. The capsid protein (CP) of Turnip crinkle virus (TCV) is a well-characterized VSR, whereas SUPPRESSOR OF GENE SILENCING 3 (SGS3) is an important plant-encoded component of the RNA silencing pathways. Whether the VSR activity of TCV CP requires it to engage SGS3 in plant cells has yet to be investigated. Here, we report that TCV CP interacts with SGS3 of Arabidopsis in both yeast and plant cells. The interaction was identified with the yeast two-hybrid system, and corroborated with bimolecular fluorescence complementation and intracellular co-localization assays in Nicotiana benthamiana cells. While multiple partial TCV CP fragments could independently interact with SGS3, its hinge domain connecting the surface and protruding domains appears to be essential for this interaction. Conversely, SGS3 enlists its N-terminal domain and the XS rice gene X and SGS3 (XS) domain as the primary CP-interacting sites. Interestingly, SGS3 appears to stimulate TCV accumulation because viral RNA levels of a TCV mutant with low VSR activities decreased in the sgs3 knockout mutants, but increased in the SGS3-overexpressing transgenic plants. Transgenic Arabidopsis plants overexpressing TCV CP exhibited developmental abnormalities that resembled sgs3 knockout mutants and caused similar defects in the biogenesis of trans-acting small interfering RNAs. Our data suggest that TCV CP interacts with multiple RNA silencing pathway components that include SGS3, as well as previously reported DRB4 (dsRNA-binding protein 4) and AGO2 (ARGONAUTE protein 2), to achieve efficient suppression of RNA silencing-mediated antiviral defence.     

A histone methyltransferase inhibits seed germination by increasing PIF1 mRNA expression in imbibed seeds

Phytochrome‐interacting factor 1 (PIF1) inhibits light‐dependent seed germination. The specific function of PIF1 in seed germination is partly due to its high level of expression in imbibed seeds, but the associated regulatory factors have not been identified. Here we show that mutation of the early flowering in short days (EFS) gene, encoding an H3K4 and H3K36 methyltransferase, decreases the level of H3K36me2 and H3K36me3 but not H3K4me3 at the PIF1 locus, reduces the targeting of RNA polymerase II to the PIF1 locus, and reduces mRNA expression of PIF1 in imbibed seeds. Consistently, the efs mutant geminated even under the phyB_off condition, and had an expression profile of PIF1 target genes similar to that of the pif1 mutant. Introduction of an EFS transgene into the efs mutant restored the level of H3K36me2 and H3K36me3 at the PIF1 locus, the high‐level expression of PIF1 mRNA, the expression pattern of PIF1 target genes, and the light‐dependent germination of these seeds. Introduction of a PIF1 transgene into the efs mutant also restored the expression pattern of PIF1 target genes and light‐dependent germination in imbibed seeds, but did not restore the flowering phenotype. Taken together, our results indicate that EFS is necessary for high‐level expression of PIF1 mRNA in imbibed seeds.     

SGS1 is a multicopy suppressor of srs2: functional overlap between DNA helicases

Sgs1 is a member of the RecQ family of DNA helicases, which have been implicated in genomic stability, cancer and ageing. Srs2 is another DNA helicase that shares several phenotypic features with Sgs1 and double sgs1srs2 mutants have a severe synthetic growth phenotype. This suggests that there may be functional overlap between these two DNA helicases. Consistent with this idea, we found the srs2Δ mutant to have a similar genotoxin sensitivity profile and replicative lifespan to the sgs1Δ mutant. In order to directly test if Sgs1 and Srs2 are functionally interchangeable, the ability of high-copy SGS1 and SRS2 plasmids to complement the srs2Δ and sgs1Δ mutants was assessed. We report here that SGS1 is a multicopy suppressor of the methyl methanesulphonate (MMS) and hydroxyurea sensitivity of the srs2Δ mutant, whereas SRS2 overexpression had no complementing ability in the sgs1Δ mutant. Domains of Sgs1 directly required for processing MMS-induced DNA damage, most notably the helicase domain, are also required for complementation of the srs2Δ mutant. Although SGS1 overexpression was unable to rescue the shortened mean replicative lifespan of the srs2Δ mutant, maximum lifespan was significantly increased by multicopy SGS1. We conclude that Sgs1 is able to partially compensate for the loss of Srs2.