HDL and triglyceride as therapeutic targets

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Epidemiological studies have shown that plasma HDL-cholesterol is inversely related to coronary artery disease and that there is an inverse relationship between HDL-cholesterol and triglyceride levels, but it is now demonstrated that hypertriglyceridemia is an independent risk factor for coronary heart disease (CHD). The goal of this review is to discuss if triglycerides and HDL-cholesterol could be therapeutic targets to reduce cardiovascular risk. RECENT FINDINGS: Triglyceride measurement is not informative on the specificity of the triglyceride-rich lipoproteins present in the plasma because some of these are not atherogenic (chylomicrons, large VLDLs) while others are highly atherogenic (small VLDLs, remnants, IDL...). Statins, in addition to reducing LDL-cholesterol, significantly reduced atherogenic remnant lipoprotein cholesterol levels. 4S, CARE+LIPID, and AFCAPS/TexCAPS studies, suggested enhanced therapeutic potential of statins for improving triglyceride and HDL-cholesterol levels in patients with CHD. A fibrate (gemfibrozil) was shown to reduce death from CHD and non-fatal myocardial infarction in secondary prevention of CHD in men with low levels of HDL-cholesterol (VA-HIT); during the treatment these levels predicted the magnitude of reduction in risk for CHD events. SUMMARY: ATP III recommendations state, on triglycerides and HDL-cholesterol as targets to reduce cardiovascular risk: (1) that lowering LDL-cholesterol levels is the primary target of therapy, (2) a secondary target is to achieve a triglyceride level < 150 mg/dL and (3) clinical trial data are considered to be insufficient to support recommended a specific HDL-cholesterol goal even if HDL-cholesterol < 40 mg/dL is considered to be a major risk factor of CHD.     

Which is the best lipid-modifying strategy in metabolic syndrome and diabetes: fibrates, statins or both?

Although less clinical intervention studies have been performed with fibrates than with statins, there are evidences indicating that fibrates may reduce risk of cardiovascular events. The potential clinical benefit of the fenofibrate will be specified by the ongoing Fenofibrate Intervention and Event Lowering in Diabetes (FIELD) study, which rationale, methods and aims have been just published. Controlled clinical trials show similar or even greater cardiovascular benefits from statins-based therapy in patient subgroups with diabetes compared with overall study populations. Therefore, statins are the drug of first choice for aggressive lipid lowering actions and reducing risk of coronary artery disease in these patients. However, current therapeutic use of statins as monotherapy is still leaving many patients with mixed atherogenic dyslipidemia at high risk for coronary events. A combination statin/fibrate therapy may be often necessary to control all lipid abnormalities in patients with metabolic syndrome and diabetes adequately, since fibrates provide additional important benefits, particularly on triglyceride and HDL-cholesterol levels. Thus, this combined therapy concentrates on all the components of the mixed dyslipidemia that often occurs in persons with diabetes or metabolic syndrome, and may be expected to reduce cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Safety concerns about some fibrates such as gemfibrozil may lead to exaggerate precautions regarding fibrate administration and therefore diminish the use of the seagents. However, other fibrates, such as bezafibrate and fenofibrate appear to be safer and better tolerated. We believe that a proper co-administration of statins and fibrates, selected on basis of their safety, could be more effective in achieving a comprehensive lipid control as compared with monotherapy.     

Statin therapy for prevention and treatment of acute and chronic cardiovascular disease: update on recent trials and metaanalyses

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To summarize the evidence from recent clinical trials and metaanalyses on the efficacy of statin therapy to reduce death, myocardial infarction and stroke, and to review the effects of statins in patients with low LDL cholesterol, diabetes, end-stage renal disease, and acute coronary syndrome. RECENT FINDINGS: In large metaanalyses of randomized controlled trials relative risk reductions from statins compared with placebo for patients with manifest or with risk factors for coronary artery disease were 13% for overall mortality, 26% for fatal and nonfatal myocardial infarction, and 18% for fatal and nonfatal stroke. Evidence from large trials suggests that patients with type II diabetes compared with patients without diabetes have similar risk reductions from statins for cardiovascular events, but this benefit is not seen in patients with diabetes and end-stage renal disease. In patients with acute coronary syndrome, early treatment with high-dose atorvastatin reduces cardiovascular morbidity after the first 4 months following the event, but the impact on mortality endpoints remains less clear. Results from recent trials in patients with stable coronary artery disease or type II diabetes suggest that statins provide benefit at considerable low LDL cholesterol levels. Therefore, target values for LDL cholesterol of less than 1.8 mmol/l (<70 mg/dl) should be considered for all patients with coronary artery disease or equivalent coronary risk. SUMMARY: For patients at high risk of coronary artery disease there is growing evidence for the concept of 'the lower, the better' regarding LDL cholesterol levels. Ongoing trials are further investigating the safety of lower target values in patients at various risk of coronary artery disease.     

Role for fibrate therapy in diabetes: evidence before FIELD

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Diabetic dyslipidaemia, among the main factors contributing to vascular risk in type 2 diabetes, is characterized by hypertriglyceridaemia, low HDL-cholesterol and increased prevalence of small dense LDL particles. Because fibrates have positive effects on triglycerides, HDL-cholesterol and LDL particle size, they may be an appropriate treatment for diabetic dyslipidaemia. Statins have been shown to diminish significantly the risk for coronary disease in patients with type 2 diabetes, and so what are the real effects of fibrates on cardiovascular risk in type 2 diabetes? RECENT FINDINGS: Although statins reduce the incidence of coronary disease in type 2 diabetes, data from clinical trials demonstrate 'residual' cardiovascular risk in these patients treated with statins. Clinical trials with fibrates show that they are particularly effective in reducing cardiovascular risk in patients with type 2 diabetes/metabolic syndrome and in those exhibiting the lipid abnormalities typical of diabetic dyslipidaemia (elevated triglycerides, low HDL-cholesterol). SUMMARY: Data on the effects of fibrates on cardiovascular risk in diabetes were obtained from subgroup analyses. Thus far, the only study performed specifically in patients with type 2 diabetes is the angiographic Diabetes Atherosclerosis Intervention Study which demonstrated a significant reduction in progression of atherosclerosis in patients receiving fenofibrate, but it was not powered to analyse the effects of fibrates on clinical outcomes. This is why the Fenofibrate Intervention and Event Lowering in Diabetes study is needed; it will provide robust data on the ability of fibrates to reduce cardiovascular risk in patients with type 2 diabetes.     

The safety and efficacy of achieving very low LDL-cholesterol concentrations with high dose statin therapy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The benefits of lipid lowering with statins are established in patients with or at risk for coronary artery disease. Recent trials with high doses of potent statins have examined treating to very low levels of LDL-cholesterol. Concerns have been raised about the safety of this strategy. This review examines the safety and efficacy of treating to very low LDL-cholesterol. RECENT FINDINGS: Four clinical trials, Treating to New Targets (TNT) and Incremental Decrease in End Points Through Aggressive Lipid Lowering (IDEAL) in stable coronary artery disease and Aggrastat to Zocor (A to Z) and Pravastatin or Atorvastatin Evaluation and Infection Therapy (PROVE IT)-TIMI 22 following acute coronary syndromes, have examined intensive statin therapy compared to moderate statin therapy. These trials and a meta-analysis demonstrated that intensive statin therapy reduces cardiovascular events. Subsequent analyses from these trials suggest that very low levels of LDL-cholesterol can be achieved safely and may improve clinical outcomes. A note of caution regarding hemorrhagic events following stroke with intensive statin therapy was raised by the Stroke Prevention by Aggressive Reduction of Cholesterol Levels (SPARCL) trial despite impressive reductions in cardiovascular events. SUMMARY: A growing body of evidence suggests progressive benefit for lowering LDL-cholesterol aggressively with intensive statin therapy in coronary artery disease. Future trials will be needed to define whether there is a level of LDL-cholesterol beyond which further benefit is not seen or safety concerns emerge.     

Treating patients with low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol: choices, issues and opportunities

Three clinical trials have recently focused on the benefits of lipid-regulating therapy in populations with normocholesterolaemia and low high-density lipoprotein (HDL)-cholesterol. Two secondary prevention studies (Veterans Affairs HDL-Cholesterol Intervention Trial [VA-HIT] and Bezafibrate Infarction Prevention [BIP] trial) testified to the efficacy of fibrates in decreasing cardiovascular events, particularly in patients with coexisting risk factors, including hypertriglyceridaemia. The Air Force/Texas Coronary Atherosclerosis Prevention Study (AFCAPS/TexCAPS) demonstrated that a statin could decrease acute coronary events in patients with isolated low HDL-cholesterol in a primary prevention setting. The absolute risk reduction in coronary events in the VA-HIT study compares favourably with those reported from the statin-based Cholesterol and Recurrent Events (CARE) and Long-term Intervention with Pravastatin in Ischaemic Disease (LIPID) trials. The absolute risk reduction in AFCAPS-TexCAPS is similar to that in West of Scotland Coronary Pravastatin Study (WOSCOPS). Recommendations are given concerning lifestyle and pharmacological management of low HDL-cholesterol. Optimal management also requires review of current treatment targets for HDL-cholesterol and triglycerides levels.     

Cardiovascular disease with diabetes or the metabolic syndrome: should statins or fibrates be first line lipid therapy?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Subgroups with diabetes or with features of the metabolic syndrome have been increasingly highlighted in large clinical endpoint trials with lipid therapy. This review will focus on the results of trials with statins or fibrates and examine the strength of the evidence for major cardiovascular event reduction with each kind of therapy in these high-risk subgroups that typically have low-to-moderate levels of LDL cholesterol. RECENT FINDINGS: Of six statin trials in populations with moderately increased LDL cholesterol only one, the Heart Protection Study, has shown that statin therapy will significantly reduce the major coronary heart disease events of non-fatal myocardial infarction or coronary heart disease death in diabetes. None of these trials has shown that statins have a particular predilection for reducing cardiovascular events in individuals with higher levels of body weight or other features of the metabolic syndrome. There are far fewer trial data with fibrates than with statins. However, the Veterans Affairs High Density Lipoprotein Intervention Trial has shown that a fibrate can significantly reduce major cardiovascular events, most particularly coronary heart disease death, in those with diabetes as well as those without diabetes who have insulin resistance. Indeed, all fibrate trials show that this therapy appears to selectively benefit the individual with obesity and features of the metabolic syndrome. SUMMARY: Based principally on evidence from the Veterans Affairs High Density Lipoprotein Intervention Trial and the cumulative experience with statins, trial data would thus far suggest that the patient with a modest increase in LDL cholesterol who has diabetes or features of the metabolic syndrome might be likely to achieve more substantial cardiovascular benefit from fibrate than from statin therapy.     

Combination therapy in the management of complex dyslipidemias

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Patients with dyslipidemias continue to be undertreated in both the primary and secondary prevention settings. Many patients have therapeutic needs that exceed simple reductions in low-density lipoprotein levels using statins. This review discusses the need for comprehensive management of all abnormalities in a given patient's lipoprotein profile and for the use of combinations of anti-lipidemic medications, when indicated. RECENT FINDINGS: The majority of high-risk patients with manifestations of atherosclerotic disease or who have a coronary artery disease risk equivalent are not meeting their various lipoprotein targets. There is considerable reluctance to titrate statins and to use combinations of anti-lipidemic medications in patients not reaching their various lipoprotein targets. Combinations of anti-lipidemic medications can be specifically tailored to address abnormalities in multiple lipoprotein fractions. Recent clinical trials clearly demonstrate that combination therapy is well tolerated and facilitates lipoprotein goal attainment. SUMMARY: Therapeutic approaches that incorporate the use of multiple anti-lipidemic medications should be more widely adopted in order to increase the number of patients able to meet their lipoprotein goals and to produce more substantially reduced risks for acute cardiovascular events.     

Protecting the heart: a practical review of the statin studies

The aim of this review of the landmark HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors (statins) studies is to enable the clinician to draw practical lessons from these trials. The Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study (4S) established the importance of treating the hypercholesterolemic patient with established cardiovascular heart disease. The West of Scotland Coronary Prevention Study (WOSCOPS) showed the benefit of treating healthy hypercholesterolemic men who were nevertheless at high risk of developing cardiovascular heart disease in the future. The Cholesterol and Recurrent Events (CARE) study, a secondary prevention trial, proved the benefit of treating patients with myocardial ischemia and cholesterol levels within normal limits. This conclusion was confirmed by the Long-term Intervention With Pravastatin in Ischemic Disease (LIPID) study, another secondary prevention study that enrolled patients with a wide range of cholesterol levels (4-7 mmol/dL), into which the large majority of patients would belong. The importance of treating patients with established ischemic heart disease (IHD), and those at high risk of developing cardiovascular heart disease, regardless of cholesterol level, was being realized. The Air Force/Texas Coronary Artery Prevention Study (AFCAPS/TexCAPS) then showed that treatment can reduce adverse cardiovascular events even in the primary prevention of patients with normal cholesterol levels. The Myocardial Ischemia Reduction With Aggressive Cholesterol Lowering (MIRACL) trial showed that hypocholesterolemic therapy is useful in the setting of an acute coronary syndrome, while the Atorvastatin Versus Revascularisation Treatment (AVERT) study showed that aggressive statin therapy is as good as angioplasty in reducing ischemic cardiac events in patients with stable angina pectoris. Finally, the Heart Protection Study (HPS) randomized more than 20,000 patients, and the value of statins in reducing adverse cardiovascular events in the high-risk patient, including the elderly, women, and even in those with low cholesterol levels, is beyond doubt. The emphasis is now on the risk level for developing cardiovascular events, and treatment should target the high-risk group and not be dependent on the actual cholesterol level of the patient. It is interesting to compare the large amount of data on the value and safety of the statins with the much more limited and less convincing data on antioxidant vitamins.     

Role of CETP inhibitors in the treatment of dyslipidemia

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review summarizes novel human data on cholesteryl ester-transfer protein (CETP) and atherosclerosis and the possible use of CETP inhibitors in the treatment of dyslipidemia. In addition, it will underline that therapeutic targeting of the high-density lipoprotein (HDL) metabolism entails more than simply observing changes in cholesterol levels of this lipoprotein. RECENT FINDINGS: Two pharmacological small-molecule inhibitors of CETP, JTT-705 and torcetrapib, have recently been shown to effectively raise HDL cholesterol in humans without serious side effects when either used as a monotherapy or combined with statins that lower low-density lipoprotein cholesterol. Importantly, prospective data from the Epic-Norfolk study furthermore indicate that elevated CETP concentration in conjunction with elevated triglyceride levels are associated with increased odds for cardiovascular events. Data from the Diabetic Atherosclerosis Intervention Study furthermore show that elevated CETP concentration is associated with increased progression of coronary atherosclerosis in patients with type 2 diabetes who use fenofibrate. SUMMARY: Long-term studies will have to show whether CETP inhibition decreases the risk of atherosclerotic disease in dyslipidemic patients. Increased CETP activity might be detrimental under hypertriglyceridemic conditions which is of importance when considering that a large proportion of patients at increased risk from coronary artery disease exhibit elevated triglyceride levels. Studies into the effects of CETP inhibition in hypertriglyceridemic patients therefore seem warranted. Awaiting the first data on the effect of CETP inhibition on surrogate endpoints for atherosclerosis, this review furthermore outlines that the complexity of HDL metabolism will necessitate a wide variety of studies on many aspects of this intriguing lipoprotein.     

Effect of statins in stroke prevention

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This paper reviews recent studies into the outcomes of clinical trials in which statin therapy has been used in the prevention and treatment of strokes. RECENT DEVELOPMENTS: Epidemiologic studies found no or little association between blood cholesterol levels and stroke. Randomized trials have confirmed that LDL lowering decreased the risk of stroke, in diabetic or hypertensive patients with 'normal' LDL cholesterol at baseline, and in patients with coronary artery disease, with respectively 48, 27 and 25% reduction in stroke incidence. A meta-analysis of trials showed that the greater the LDL cholesterol reduction, the greater the intima-media thickness and stroke risk reductions. Even if statins also have 'pleiotropic' effects, their main action seems to be through LDL reduction. The Heart Protection Study only included strokes that occurred 4.6 years before--a time when the stroke event rate is low and the cardiac event rate is high, and so may not have had the power to find a true effect of LDL cholesterol lowering in preventing recurrent stroke. The Stroke Prevention by Aggressive Reduction in Cholesterol Levels (SPARCL) trial may give a definite answer because SPARCL investigators included 4732 patients with brain infarction or transient ischemic attacks and no history of myocardial infarction within 6 months of their stroke event, at a time when the expected stroke rate is very high and the myocardial infarction rate is very low. The results should be announced by mid-2006. SUMMARY: The positive effect of statins on stroke observed in trials of patients with coronary heart disease depended mainly on between-group LDL reduction, but other mechanisms could be involved. Though effective in prevention of major coronary events after a first stroke, statins have not yet been proven effective in prevention of recurrent stroke.     

Role of lipid-modifying therapy in the prevention of initial and recurrent stroke

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To establish the role of cholesterol-modifying therapy in stroke prevention. RECENT FINDINGS: Population-based observational cohort studies show a variable weak positive relationship between increasing plasma total cholesterol concentrations and an increasing risk of ischaemic stroke, which is partly offset by a weaker negative association between decreasing total cholesterol concentrations and an increasing risk of with haemorrhagic stroke. However, randomized controlled trials show unequivocally that lowering plasma total cholesterol by approximately 1.2 mmol/l (and LDL-cholesterol by 1.0 mmol/l) is associated with a reduced relative risk of stroke and other serious vascular events by at least a quarter, and probably a third, without any increase in haemorrhagic stroke, in a wide range of men and women (including individuals with previous stroke). The proportional reduction in stroke risk is consistent, irrespective of the patient's age, baseline plasma cholesterol concentration, and absolute risk of stroke (although perhaps less in very low-risk individuals), but is increased with greater degrees of cholesterol lowering (15% or more), and thus with statin medications, which are more potent than non-statin interventions in lowering cholesterol levels. The absolute reduction in stroke risk achieved by statins is greatest among individuals at highest risk of stroke. Preliminary evidence suggests that lowering total cholesterol levels by diet may be an effective adjunctive therapy to statins, and raising plasma HDL-cholesterol concentrations among patients with coronary heart disease and low HDL-cholesterol levels ( 1 mmol/l) by means of gemfibrozil may also effectively prevent stroke. SUMMARY: Statin drugs are effective and safe in preventing initial and recurrent stroke. However, because they are costly, they should probably be restricted to individuals with an annual risk of stroke and other serious vascular events of 3% or greater, and possibly as low as 1.5%, because routine monitoring of plasma cholesterol, and liver and muscle enzyme concentrations is probably no longer necessary.     

Statins – Do we really know all mechanisms of action of this group of drugs?

The role of statins in the treatment and prevention of cardiovascular diseases, such as coronary artery disease, acute coronary syndromes, diabetes or stroke is well established. However, there are still many questions regarding the role of statins in patients with heart failure (HF)/cardiomyopathy (CM), hypertension, atrial fibrillation (AF) and chronic kidney disease (CKD). As for patients with HF/CM inhibition of inflammation, reducing endothelial dysfunction might comprise part of the underlying mechanisms leading to the improvement of left ventricular function and exercise tolerance in these groups of patients. Therefore the candidates for statin therapy with HF/CM should be in New York Heart Association class II or III and should have normal or increased levels of lipids. We should avoid reducing lipids levels in these patients. At present, it is also difficult to unequivocally assess the impact of statins on blood pressure (BP). However, according to most available studies, the impact of statins on the decrease in BP is slight, but significant, especially among patients with hypertension. Moreover statins significantly reduce cardiovascular events in patients with hypertension. Although the results of trials concerning the use of statins in CKD patients are conflicting, it is suggested that the benefits of statin use outweigh the drawbacks in patients with early-stage CKD, when the benefits can be effectively predicted. However, available large randomized clinical trials suggest a lack of efficacy in patients on renal replacement therapy. We also needs further data on the role of statins on AF, however the existing studies suggest beneficial impact of statins in these patients.     

Simultaneous low-density lipoprotein-C lowering and high-density lipoprotein-C elevation for optimum cardiovascular disease prevention with various drug classes, and their combinations: a meta-analysis of 23 randomized lipid trials

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Our analysis presents an alternative hypothesis to the prevailing view that low-density lipoprotein-C is the only important target of lipid therapy. RECENT FINDINGS: Two recently published studies showed surprising results. In the Armed Forces Regression Study, low-density lipoprotein-C was lowered only 22% with cholystyramine, niacin and gemfibrozil. Coronary stenosis regressed, however, and the primary clinical event rate was reduced by 54%. Conversely, in the FIELD trial, the primary event rate reduction was only 11% (P = NS). These differences appeared to be explained largely by the difference in high-density lipoprotein response to these regimens (38 vs. 3%). This meta-analysis of 23 trials strongly supports the notion that the sum of percent reduction in low-density lipoprotein-C plus percent increase in high-density lipoprotein-C predicts benefits much more effectively than either lipoprotein component. SUMMARY: Epidemiology suggests that the cardiovascular event rate is reduced by nearly 1% for each 1% reduction in low-density lipoprotein-C and by at least 1% for each 1% increase in high-density lipoprotein. These effects are statistically independent; thus, for moderate lipid changes, they are additive. If this simple algorithm is proven accurate, a 30% high-density lipoprotein-C increase and a 40% low-density lipoprotein-C reduction would result in a nearly 70% CHD risk reduction - and a revolution in cardiovascular prevention.     

HDL revisited: new opportunities for managing dyslipoproteinaemia and cardiovascular disease

Low concentrations of high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol constitute a risk factor for coronary heart disease (CHD). There is increasing evidence that increasing HDL-cholesterol levels reduces cardiovascular risk. The phenotype of low HDL cholesterol with or without elevated triglycerides is common and it is characteristic of patients with central obesity, insulin resistance, hypertension and type 2 diabetes mellitus; conditions associated with increased cardiovascular risk and are part of the rubric of the metabolic syndrome. Epidemiological, experimental and clinical trial evidence suggests that there is a good rationale for raising HDL-cholesterol in these and other high-risk patients. The protective effect of HDL-cholesterol against atherosclerosis and cardiovascular disease is mediated by both enhanced reverse cholesterol transport (RCT) and by direct anti-atherosclerotic mechanisms. Recent studies have elucidated mechanisms whereby HDL acts to reduce cardiovascular risk, supporting the rationale for targeting of HDL with lipid-modifying therapy. Ongoing investigation of mechanisms by which HDL acts to reduce the risk of atherosclerosis will provide opportunities for the development of new therapeutic strategies to decrease the risk of atherosclerosis.     

Cardiovascular outcomes among participants with diabetes in the recent large statin trials

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Despite their increased cardiovascular risk and its continuous relationship with cholesterol, until recently only diabetic patients with marked dyslipidaemia were routinely offered lipid-lowering therapy. The secondary prevention statin trials led to more widespread cholesterol lowering in patients with coronary disease and diabetes. Here we review the results of recent randomized trials, which included substantial numbers of patients with diabetes and no vascular disease. RECENT FINDINGS: The MRC/BHF Heart Protection Study included 5963 participants with diabetes, of whom 2912 had no history of vascular disease at baseline. Patients were randomized to 40 mg simvastatin daily or matching placebo for 5 years, which, on average, reduced LDL by 1.0 mmol/l compared with placebo. Highly significant reductions of about one-quarter in major vascular events were seen both overall and in different types of patient with diabetes, including those with average and below average lipid levels. Recent data from the Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial and the Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial support these findings and are consistent with these effects. SUMMARY: Good quality, randomized trials including substantial numbers of patients with diabetes show that such patients obtain the same proportional benefit as other groups studied. Given their increased cardiovascular risk, these findings argue for a simple strategy of considering routine statin therapy for patients with type 2 diabetes and adult patients with type 1 diabetes, irrespective of lipid levels. As generic statins become available this could have a greater impact on the burden of cardiovascular disease in diabetes than restricted and targeted therapy.     

Fluvastatin in the therapy of acute coronary syndrome: Rationale and design of a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (The FACS Trial)[ISRCTN81331696

BACKGROUND: Activation of inflammatory pathways plays an important contributory role in coronary plaque instability and subsequent rupture, which can lead to the development of acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Elevated levels of serum inflammatory markers such as C-reactive protein (CRP) represent independent risk factors for further cardiovascular events. Recent evidence indicates that in addition to lowering cholesterol levels, statins also decrease levels of inflammatory markers. Previous controlled clinical trials reporting the positive effects of statins in participants with ACS were designed for very early secondary prevention. To our knowledge, no controlled trials have evaluated the potential benefits of statin therapy, beginning immediately at the time of hospital admission. A previous pilot study performed by our group focused on early initiation of cerivastatin therapy. We demonstrated a highly significant reduction in levels of inflammatory markers (CRP and interleukin-6). Based on these preliminary findings, we are conducting a clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy of another statin, fluvastatin, as an early intervention in patients with ACS. METHODS: The FACS-trial (Fluvastatin in the therapy of Acute Coronary Syndrome) is a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study evaluating the effects of fluvastatin therapy initiated at the time of hospital admission. The study will enroll 1,000 participants admitted to hospital for ACS (both with and without ST elevation). The primary endpoint for the study is the influence of fluvastatin therapy on levels of inflammatory markers (CRP and interleukin-6) and on pregnancy associated plasma protein A (PAPP-A). A combined secondary endpoint is 30-day and one-year occurrence of death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, recurrent symptomatic ischemia, urgent revascularization, and cardiac arrest. CONCLUSION: The primary objective of the FACS trial is to demonstrate that statin therapy, when started immediately after hospital admission for ACS, results in reduction of inflammation and improvement of prognosis. This study may contribute to new knowledge regarding therapeutic strategies for patients suffering from ACS and may offer additional clinical indications for the use of statins.     

A role for acute-phase serum amyloid A and high-density lipoprotein in oxidative stress,endothelial dysfunction and atherosclerosis

Abstract

The acute-phase protein serum amyloid A (SAA) is a clinically useful marker of inflammation and associates strongly with increased risk of cardiovascular events. Chronically elevated SAA concentrations may contribute to physiological processes that lead to atherosclerosis, including endothelial dysfunction, an early and predictive event in the development of cardiovascular disease. Accumulating data suggest that SAA can be a direct mediator in the development and progression of atherogenesis and atherothrombosis. SAA may affect key events underlying acute coronary syndromes, including cholesterol transport, contribute to endothelial dysfunction, promote thrombosis, and enhance leukocyte trafficking and activation. This review summarizes the evidence supporting a role for SAA as a potential regulator of inflammation and endothelial dysfunction, which underlie the adverse outcomes that complicate coronary artery disease. The findings suggest that novel therapeutic strategies to reduce SAA levels and/or oppose the actions of SAA may have beneficial effects in patients with coronary artery disease.     

Lipid management after acute coronary syndrome

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Despite advances in medical therapy and percutaneous revascularization, patients with acute coronary syndrome face a high risk of early, recurrent cardiovascular events. Interventions targeting atherogenic lipoproteins may favorably modify this risk. RECENT FINDINGS: Two randomized clinical trials, MIRACL and PROVE-IT, demonstrated efficacy of early, intensive statin therapy after acute coronary syndrome. Recent observational and meta-analyses corroborate the findings of these trials. The benefit of intensive statin treatment appears to apply broadly to elderly as well as younger patients, and to patients with or without diabetes or metabolic syndrome. Randomized trials demonstrating the efficacy of early, intensive statin treatment after acute coronary syndrome employed fixed statin dosages, and there does not appear to be an initial or achieved LDL-cholesterol level below which benefit is absent. As such, broad application of intensive statin therapy after acute coronary syndrome may be preferable to titration of statin dose to achieve specific LDL goals. Low HDL-cholesterol predicts risk after acute coronary syndrome; therefore, pharmacologic interventions to raise HDL concentration or mimic its function may help reduce that risk. SUMMARY: Early, intensive statin therapy is safe and effective after acute coronary syndrome. Future research will determine whether drugs that raise or mimic HDL-cholesterol are effective adjuncts to statin therapy.     

Efficacy of statins for primary prevention in people at low cardiovascular risk: a meta-analysis

Background:

Statins were initially used to improve cardiovascular outcomes in people with established coronary artery disease, but recently their use has become more common in people at low cardiovascular risk. We did a systematic review of randomized trials to assess the efficacy and harms of statins in these individuals.

Methods:

We searched MEDLINE and EMBASE (to Jan. 28, 2011), registries of health technology assessments and clinical trials, and reference lists of relevant reviews. We included trials that randomly assigned participants at low cardiovascular risk to receive a statin versus a placebo or no statin. We defined low risk as an observed 10-year risk of less than 20% for cardiovascular-related death or nonfatal myocardial infarction, but we explored other definitions in sensitivity analyses.

Results:

We identified 29 eligible trials involving a total of 80 711 participants. All-cause mortality was significantly lower among patients receiving a statin than among controls (relative risk [RR] 0.90, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.84–0.97) for trials with a 10-year risk of cardiovascular disease < 20% [primary analysis] and 0.83, 95% CI 0.73–0.94, for trials with 10-year risk < 10% [sensitivity analysis]). Patients in the statin group were also significantly less likely than controls to have nonfatal myocardial infarction (RR 0.64, 95% CI 0.49–0.84) and nonfatal stroke (RR 0.81, 95% CI 0.68–0.96). Neither metaregression nor stratified analyses suggested statistically significant differences in efficacy between high-and low-potency statins, or larger reductions in cholesterol.

Interpretation:

Statins were found to be efficacious in preventing death and cardiovascular morbidity in people at low cardiovascular risk. Reductions in relative risk were similar to those seen in patients with a history of coronary artery disease.Although statins are known to improve survival and relevant clinical outcomes in high-risk populations,¹ evidence of their clinical benefit in lower risk populations is more equivocal. Initially, low-risk populations were defined by the absence of known coronary artery disease (and their treatment was termed “primary prevention”). However, it was subsequently recognized that these populations included both patients at very high risk of coronary artery disease (e.g., those with severe peripheral vascular disease) and those at very low risk (e.g., those aged < 40 years who have no diabetes or hypertension and have low-density lipoprotein cholesterol level of less than 1.8 mmol/L). Accordingly, current guidelines for the use of statins are based on the projected risk of an atherosclerotic event rather than solely on the presence or absence of known coronary artery disease.^2,3Results of the recent JUPITER study (Justification for the Use of Statins in Prevention: an Intervention Trial Evaluating Rosuvastatin)⁴ have renewed enthusiasm for the use of statins in people without a history of coronary artery disease and have generated further controversy as to whether high-potency statins such as rosuvastatin and atorvastatin lead to better clinical outcomes than low-potency statins such as pravastatin, simvastatin, fluvastatin and lovastatin. We did a systematic review of randomized trials to assess the efficacy and harms of statins in people at low cardiovascular risk, including indirect comparisons of high-potency and low-potency statins.