Chloroplast movement

Abstract. Chloroplasts redistribute and/or reorientate in the cell as a response to the light direction, resulting in patterns typical for light of low or high fluence rate, respectively. Usually, the main photoreceptor pigment is a blue-UV-absorbing pigment ('cryptochrome'), but in a few exceptional cases, the reversible red/far-red system phytochrome is involved. Detection of light direction is based on light refraction and/or on dichroic orientation of photoreceptor molecules. Membrane effects, intracellular calcium redistribution and calcium-calmodulin interaction are discussed as likely steps in signal transduction . In the response mechanism the actin-myosin system is involved. However, several details of perception, transduction and response are still unsolved and open for discussion. Particularly interesting are the cases of multiple photoreceptor systems , i.e. those where separate transduction chains are started which coact or interact with each other. This raises the question as to the evolution of multiple photoreceptor systems under the assumption that light-oriented chloroplast movements serve to optimize photosynthesis.     

Light perception and the role of the xanthophyll cycle in blue-light-dependent chloroplast movements in lemna trisulca L

In most higher plants, chloroplasts move towards the periclinal cell walls in weak blue light (WBL) to increase light harvesting for photosynthesis, and towards the anticlinal walls as an escape reaction, thus avoiding photo-damage in strong blue light (SBL). The photo- receptor(s) triggering these responses have not yet been identified. In this study, the role of zeaxanthin as a blue-light photoreceptor in chloroplast movements was investigated. Time-lapse 3D confocal imaging in Lemna trisulca showed that individual chloroplasts responded to local illumination when one half of the cell was treated with light of different intensity or spectral quality to that received by the other half, or was maintained in darkness. Thus the complete signal perception, transduction and effector system has a high degree of spatial resolution and is consistent with localization of part of the transduction chain in the chloroplasts. Turnover of xanthophylls was determined using HPLC, and a parallel increase was observed between zeaxanthin and chloroplast movements in SBL. Ascorbate stimulated both a transient increase in zeaxanthin levels and chloroplast movement to profile in physiological darkness. Conversely, dithiothreitol blocked zeaxanthin production and responses to SBL and, to a lesser extent, WBL. Norflurazon preferentially inhibited SBL-dependent chloroplast movements. Increases in zeaxanthin were also observed in strong red light (SRL) when no directional chloroplast movements occurred. Thus it appears that a combination of zeaxanthin and blue light is required to trigger responses. Blue light can cause cis-trans isomerization of xanthophylls, thus photo-isomerization may be a critical link in the signal transduction pathway.     

The avoidance and aggregative movements of mesophyll chloroplasts in C(4) monocots in response to blue light and abscisic acid

In C(4) plants, mesophyll (M) chloroplasts are randomly distributed along the cell walls, whereas bundle sheath chloroplasts are located in either a centripetal or centrifugal position. It was reported previously that only M chloroplasts aggregatively redistribute to the bundle sheath side in response to extremely strong light or environmental stresses. The aggregative movement of M chloroplasts is also induced in a light-dependent fashion upon incubation with abscisic acid (ABA). The involvement of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and red/blue light in the aggregative movement of M chloroplasts are examined here in two distinct subtypes of C(4) plants, finger millet and maize. Exogenously applied hydrogen peroxide or ROS scavengers could not change the response patterns of M chloroplast movement to light and ABA. Blue light irradiation essentially induced the rearrangement of M chloroplasts along the sides of anticlinal walls, parallel to the direction of the incident light, which is analogous to the avoidance movement of C(3) chloroplasts. In the presence of ABA, most of the M chloroplasts showed the aggregative movement in response to blue light but not red light. Together these results suggest that ROS are not involved in signal transduction for the aggregative movement, and ABA can shift the blue light-induced avoidance movement of C(4)-M chloroplasts to the aggregative movement.     

Recent advances in understanding the molecular mechanism of chloroplast photorelocation movement

Plants are photosynthetic organisms that have evolved unique systems to adapt fluctuating environmental light conditions. In addition to well-known movement responses such as phototropism, stomatal opening, and nastic leaf movements, chloroplast photorelocation movement is one of the essential cellular responses to optimize photosynthetic ability and avoid photodamage. For these adaptations, chloroplasts accumulate at the areas of cells illuminated with low light (called accumulation response), while they scatter from the area illuminated with strong light (called avoidance response). Plant-specific photoreceptors (phototropin, phytochrome, and/or neochrome) mediate these dynamic directional movements in response to incident light position and intensity. Several factors involved in the mechanisms underlying the processes from light perception to actin-based movements have also been identified through molecular genetic approach. This review aims to discuss recent findings in the field relating to how chloroplasts move at molecular levels. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: Dynamic and ultrastructure of bioenergetic membranes and their components.     

Blue light-induced chloroplast relocation in Arabidopsis thaliana as analyzed by microbeam irradiation

Chloroplast relocation in mesophyll cells of Arabidopsis thaliana was observed microscopically and analyzed by microbeam irradiation. Chloroplasts located along the anticlinal walls in dark-adapted cells. When part of a cell was irradiated with a microbeam of high fluence rate blue light (B) simultaneously with background red light (R) on the whole cell, the chloroplasts moved towards the B-irradiated area, but did not enter the beam. The background R illumination activated cytoplasmic motility as well as chloroplast movement. Without R illumination, there was little chloroplast relocation. In light-adapted cells in which the chloroplasts were spread over the cell surface perpendicular to the incident light, R-illumination had the same effect. Under background R, the chloroplasts moved out of the area irradiated with a B microbeam of 8 or 30 W m(-2) (avoidance response), but chloroplasts outside the beam moved towards the area irradiated with the B microbeam (accumulation response). These results suggest that the signals for accumulation and avoidance responses were generated in a single cell by high fluence rate B. cry1cry2, npq1 and nph1 mutants showed B-induced chloroplast relocation. Both the accumulation and avoidance responses were observed in all the mutants, although in the nph1 mutant, the sensitivity of accumulation movement was slightly lower than that of the wild type. We discuss the possible photoreceptor for B-induced chloroplast relocation.     

Distribution pattern changes of actin filaments during chloroplast movement in Adiantum capillus-veneris

Chloroplasts change their positions in a cell in response to light intensities. The photoreceptors involved in chloroplast photo-relocation movements and the behavior of chloroplasts during their migration were identified in our previous studies, but the mechanism of movement has yet to be clarified. In this study, the behavior of actin filaments under various light conditions was observed in Adiantum capillus-veneris gametophytes. In chloroplasts staying in one place under a weak light condition and not moving, circular structures composed of actin filaments were observed around the chloroplast periphery. In contrast, short actin filaments were observed at the leading edge of moving chloroplasts induced by partial cell irradiation. In the dark, the circular structures found under the weak light condition disappeared and then reappeared around the moving chloroplasts. Mutant analyses revealed that the disappearance of the circular actin structure was mediated by the blue light photoreceptor, phototropin2.     

Regulation of the orientation movement of chloroplasts in epidermal cells of Vallisneria: cooperation of phytochrome with photosynthetic pigment under low-fluence-rate light

In epidermal cells of the leaves of the aquatic angiosperm Vallisneria gigantea Graebner, the chloroplasts accumulate in the outer periclinal layer of cytoplasm (P side) under light at low fluence rates. The nature of such intracellular orientation of chloroplasts was investigated in a semiquantitative manner. Time-lapse video microscopy revealed that, while irradiation with red light (650 nm, 0.41 W · m^–2) rapidly accelerated the migration of chloroplasts, not only from the anticlinal layers of cytoplasm (A sides) to the P side but also from the P side to the A sides, the increased rate of migration in both directions returned to the control rate upon subsequent irradiation with far-red light (746nm, 0.14W · m^–2). These effects of red and far-red light could be observed repeatedly, both in the presence and in the absence of inhibitors of photosynthesis, suggesting the involvement of phytochrome as the photoreceptor. After saturating irradiation with red light, the increased rate of migration of chloroplasts from the P side to the A sides declined more rapidly than the increased rate of migration in the opposite direction. This imbalance in the migration of chloroplasts between the two opposing directions resulted in the accumulation of chloroplasts on the P side. The more rapid decline in the rate of migration of chloroplasts from the P side to the A sides than in the opposite direction was not observed in the presence of an inhibitor of photosynthesis. It appears, therefore, that phytochrome and photosynthetic pigment cooperatively regulate the accumulation of chloroplasts on the P side through modulation of the nature of the movement of the chloroplasts.Abbreviations A side cytoplasmic layer that faces the anticlinal wall - DCMU 3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea - Pfr farred-light-absorbing form of phytochrome - Pr red-light-absorbing form of phytochrome - P side cytoplasmic layer that faces the outer periclinal wall This work was supported in part by Grants-in-Aid from the Japanese Ministry of Education, Science and Culture to S.T. and R.N. The authors are indebted to the Osaka branch of Kashimura Inc. for their kind cooperation in preparing the GREEN software.     

Rapid Severing and Motility of Chloroplast-Actin Filaments Are Required for the Chloroplast Avoidance Response in Arabidopsis

Phototropins (phot1 and phot2 in Arabidopsis thaliana) relay blue light intensity information to the chloroplasts, which move toward weak light (the accumulation response) and away from strong light (the avoidance response). Chloroplast-actin (cp-actin) filaments are vital for mediating these chloroplast photorelocation movements. In this report, we examine in detail the cp-actin filament dynamics by which the chloroplast avoidance response is regulated. Although stochastic dynamics of cortical actin fragments are observed on the chloroplasts, the basic mechanisms underlying the disappearance (including severing and turnover) of the cp-actin filaments are regulated differently from those of cortical actin filaments. phot2 plays a pivotal role in the strong blue light–induced severing and random motility of cp-actin filaments, processes that are therefore essential for asymmetric cp-actin formation for the avoidance response. In addition, phot2 functions in the bundling of cp-actin filaments that is induced by dark incubation. By contrast, the function of phot1 is dispensable for these responses. Our findings suggest that phot2 is the primary photoreceptor involved in the rapid reorganization of cp-actin filaments that allows chloroplasts to change direction rapidly and control the velocity of the avoidance movement according to the light’s intensity and position.     

The role of calcium in blue-light-dependent chloroplast movement in lemna trisulca L

Chloroplast movements are a normal physiological response to changes in light intensity and provide a good model system to analyse the signal transduction pathways following light perception. Blue-light-dependent chloroplast movements were observed in Lemna trisulca using confocal optical sectioning and 3-D reconstruction or photometric measurements of leaf transmission. Chloroplasts moved away from strong blue light (SBL) towards the anticlinal walls (profile position), and towards the periclinal walls (face position) under weak blue light (WBL) over about 20-40 min. Cytoplasmic calcium ([Ca2 + ]cyt) forms part of the signalling system in response to SBL as movements were associated with small increases in [Ca2 + ]cyt and were blocked by antagonists of calcium homeostasis, including EGTA, nifedipine, verapamil, caffeine, thapsigargin, TFP (trifluoperazine), W7 and compound 48/80. Treatments predicted to affect internal Ca2 + stores gave the most rapid and pronounced effects. In addition, artificially increasing [Ca2 + ]cyt in darkness using the Ca2 + ionophore A23187 and high external Ca2 + (or Sr2 + ), triggered partial movement of chloroplasts to profile position analogous to a SBL response. These data are all consistent with [Ca2 + ]cyt acting as a signal in SBL responses; however, the situation is more complex given that both WBL and SBL responses were inhibited to a similar extent by all the Ca2 + -signalling antagonists used. As the direction of chloroplast movement in WBL is exactly opposite to that in SBL, we conclude that, whilst proper regulation of [Ca2 + ]cyt homeostasis is critical for both SBL and WBL responses, additional factors may be required to specify the direction of chloroplast movement.     

Die Chloroplastendrehung beiMougeotia

Summary Mougeotia cells with chloroplasts oriented in profile have been irradiated with small spots of monochromatic red polarized light in order to induce chloroplast movement.In these experiments, four factors have been varied: 1. the orientation of the vibration plane of the light in relation to the cell axis, 2. the localization of the spot, i. e. irradiation of the chloroplast or the cytoplasm, 3. the spot size, and 4. the duration of the irradiation.As a result of our experiments, we conclude that the photoreceptor molecules responsible for the light-induced chloroplast movement are localized in the cytoplasm.As the photoreceptor of this reaction is the well known phytochromesystem, we may assume that also in other plants the phytochrome is localized in the cytoplasm rather than in the chloroplast.

---

---

Mit 9 Textabbildungen     

Chloroplasts do not have a polarity for light-induced accumulation movement

Chloroplast photorelocation movement in green plants is generally mediated by blue light. However, in cryptogam plants, including ferns, mosses, and algae, both red light and blue light are effective. Although the photoreceptors required for this phenomenon have been identified, the mechanisms underlying this movement response are not yet known. In order to analyze this response in more detail, chloroplast movement was induced in dark-adapted Adiantum capillus-veneris gametophyte cells by partial cell irradiation with a microbeam of red and/or blue light. In each case, chloroplasts were found to move toward the microbeam-irradiated area. A second microbeam was also applied to the cell at a separate location before the chloroplasts had reached the destination of the first microbeam. Under these conditions, chloroplasts were found to change their direction of movement without turning and move toward the second microbeam-irradiated area after a lag time of a few minutes. These findings indicate that chloroplasts can move in any direction and do not exhibit a polarity for chloroplast accumulation movement. This phenomenon was analyzed in detail in Adiantum and subsequently confirmed in Arabidopsis thaliana palisade cells. Interestingly, the lag time for direction change toward the second microbeam in Adiantum was longer in the red light than in the blue light. However, the reason for this discrepancy is not yet understood. Electronic supplementary material  The online version of this article (doi:) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.     

Light perception in guard cells

Abstract. Guard cells perceive light via two photoreceptor systems: a blue-light-dependent photosystem and the guard cell chloroplast. Chloroplasts stimulate stomatal opening by transducing photosynthetic active radiation into proton pumping at the guard cell plasma membrane. In addition, guard cell chloroplasts fix CO₂ photosynthetically. Sugar from guard cell photosynthesis can contribute to the osmotic build-up required for opening. The blue-light-dependent photosystem activates proton pumping at the guard cell plasma membrane and stimulates starch hydrolysis. Available information on the photobiological properties of guard cells makes it possible to describe stomatal function in terms of the cellular components regulating stomatal movements. The blue light response is involved in stomatal opening in the early morning and stomatal responses to sunflecks. The guard cell chloroplast is likely to be involved in stomatal adaptations to sun, shade and to temperature. Interactions between these photosystems, a third photoreceptor in guard cells, phytochrome, and other mechanisms transducing stomatal responses such as VPD and carbon dioxide, provide the cellular basis for stomatal regulation.     

Blue- and red-light action in photoorientation of chloroplasts in Adiantum protonemata

An action spectrum for the low-fluencerate response of chloroplast movement in protonemata of the fern Adiantum capillus-veneris L. was determined using polarized light vibrating perpendicularly to the protonema axis. The spectrum had several peaks in the blue region around 450 nm and one in the red region at 680 nm, the blue peaks being higher than the red one. The red-light action was suppressed by nonpolarized far-red light given simultaneously or alternately, whereas the bluelight action was not. Chloroplast movement was also induced by a local irradiation with a narrow beam of monochromatic light. A beam of blue light at low energy fluence rates (7.3·10^-3-1.0 W m^-2) caused movement of the chloroplasts to the beam area (positive response), while one at high fluence rates (10 W m^-2 and higher) caused movement to outside of the beam area (negative response). A red beam caused a positive response at fluence rates up to 100 W m^-2, but a negative response at very high fluence rates (230 and 470 W m^-2). When a far-red beam was combined with total background irradiation with red light at fluence rates causing a low-fluence-rate response in whole cells, chloroplasts moved out of the beam area. When blue light was used as background irradiation, however, a narrow far-red beam had no effect on chloroplast distribution. These results indicate that the light-oriented movement of Adiantum chloroplasts is caused by red and blue light, mediated by phytochrome and another, unidentified photoreceptor(s), respectively. This movement depends on a local gradient of the far-red-absorbing form of phytochrome or of a photoexcited blue-light photoreceptor, and it includes positive and negative responses for both red and blue light.Abbreviations BL blue light - FR far-red light - Pfr far-red-absorbing form of phytochrome - Pr red-absorbing form of phytochrome - R red light - UV ultraviolet     

Phototropins and neochrome1 mediate nuclear movement in the fern Adiantum capillus-veneris

In gametophytic cells (prothalli) of the fern Adiantum capillus-veneris, nuclei as well as chloroplasts change their position according to light conditions. Nuclei reside on anticlinal walls in darkness and move to periclinal or anticlinal walls under weak or strong light conditions, respectively. Here we reveal that red light-induced nuclear movement is mediated by neochrome1 (neo1), blue light-induced movement is redundantly mediated by neo1, phototropin2 (phot2) and possibly phot1, and dark positioning of both nuclei and chloroplasts is mediated by phot2. Thus, both the nuclear and chloroplast photorelocation movements share common photoreceptor systems.     

La Cellula: Aspetti Morfologici e Metabolici Dei Suoi Organuli

Abstract

The cell: morphologic and metabolic aspects of its organelles. — Some aspects of the mechanism of the chloroplasts movement induced by light, it has been studied in «Elodea canadensis» leaves. Red, yellow and blue light induce the movement of the chloroplasts. Green light does not promote the movement. 5.10—⁵M CMU completely inhibits cyclosis. Photosynthesis is required for cyclosis. ATP alone, does not Substitute photosynthesis, however in the presence of green light, 5.10—³M ATP, pH 6.5, promotes cyclosis movement. It has been concluded that light has dual role in promoting the movement in «Elodea» leaves: first, inducing photosynthesis and consequently the ATP production; second, light is necessary to start the movement exciting a photo-receptor, visualized like a System Controlling the induction-repression of enzymes. It has been postulated that ATP produced by illuminated chloroplasts, saturated a «SSS» system, connected with another System, «SAV», lowering the plasma viscosity; ATP in this action is not necessarily used as energetic Compound. Successively, by means an unknow photoreceptor, the mechano-enzyme-system, «SEM», promotes cyclosis utilizing ATP as energic source. The movement stop when ATP is exausted or immediately, in the presence of ATP, when the photoreceptor is not working, like happens in the dark.     

Phenotypic characterization of a photomorphogenic mutant

Light is arguably the most important abiotic factor controlling plant growth and development throughout their life cycle. Plants have evolved sophisticated light-sensing mechanisms to monitor fluctuations in light quality, intensity, direction and periodicity (day length). In Arabidopsis, three families of photoreceptors have been identified by molecular genetic studies. The UV-A/blue light receptors cryptochromes and the red/far-red receptors phytochromes control an overlapping set of responses including photoperiodic flowering induction and de-etiolation. Phototropins are the primary photoreceptors for a set of specific responses to UV-A/blue light such as phototropism, chloroplast movement and stomatal opening. Mutants affecting a photoreceptor have a characteristic phenotype. It is therefore possible to determine the specific developmental responses and the photoreceptor pathway(s) affected in a mutant by performing an appropriate set of photobiological and genetic experiments. In this paper, we outline the principal and easiest experiments that can be performed to obtain a first indication about the nature of the photobiological defect in a given mutant.     

Not looking where you are leaping: a novel method of oriented travel in the caterpillar Calindoea trifascialis (Moore) (Lepidoptera: Thyrididae)

The prepupation caterpillar of the Southeast Asian moth Calindoea trifascialis constructs a leaf shelter that jumps across the ground using a jumping method novel among the insects. We found that movement path direction was correlated to the direction opposite to the most intense light. Correlated random walk (CRW) analyses found net squared displacements higher than predicted by a CRW, and fractal dimension analysis indicated straighter paths at large spatial scales. Rearing experiments showed high mortality from predation on the ground, but higher mortality resulted from sun exposure. We interpret jumping path orientation as an efficient search strategy to find shade in a variable landscape, given limited perception, in the presence of overheating and desiccation risks.     

Velocity of chloroplast avoidance movement is fluence rate dependent.

In Arabidopsis leaves, chloroplast movement is fluence rate dependent. At optimal, lower light fluences, chloroplasts accumulate at the cell surface to maximize photosynthetic potential. Under high fluence rates, chloroplasts avoid incident light to escape photodamage. In this paper, we examine the phenomenon of chloroplast avoidance movement in greater detail and demonstrate a proportional relationship between fluence rate and the velocity of chloroplast avoidance. In addition we show that the amount of light-activated phototropin2, the photoreceptor for the avoidance response, likely plays a role in this phenomenon, as heterozygous mutant plants show a reduced avoidance velocity compared to that of homozygous wild type plants.     

Photosynthesis-dependent but neochrome1-independent light positioning of chloroplasts and nuclei in the fern Adiantum capillus-veneris

Chloroplasts change their positions in the cell depending on the light conditions. In the dark, chloroplasts in fern prothallia locate along the anticlinal wall (dark position). However, chloroplasts become relocated to the periclinal wall (light position) when the light shines perpendicularly to the prothallia. Red light is effective in inducing this relocation in Adiantum capillus-veneris, and neochrome1 (neo1) has been identified as the red light receptor regulating this movement. Nevertheless, we found here that chloroplasts in neo1 mutants still become relocated from the dark position to the light position under red light. We tested four neo1 mutant alleles (neo1-1, neo1-2, neo1-3, and neo1-4), and all of them showed the red-light-induced chloroplast relocation. Furthermore, chloroplast light positioning under red light occurred also in Pteris vittata, another fern species naturally lacking the neo1-dependent phenomenon. The light positioning of chloroplasts occurred independently of the direction of red light, a response different to that of the neo1-dependent movement. Photosynthesis inhibitors 3-(3,4 dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea or 2,5-dibromo-3-isopropyl-6-methyl-p-benzoquinone blocked this movement. Addition of sucrose (Suc) or glucose to the culture medium induced migration of the chloroplasts to the periclinal wall in darkness. Furthermore, Suc could override the effects of 3-(3,4 dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea. Interestingly, the same light positioning was evident for nuclei under red light in the neo1 mutant. The nuclear light positioning was also induced in darkness with the addition of Suc or glucose. These results indicate that photosynthesis-dependent nondirectional movement contributes to the light positioning of these organelles in addition to the neo1-dependent directional movement toward light.