蜜蜂肠道微生物群落研究进展

蜜蜂是重要的农业传粉昆虫,对全球农业及生态维护有着不可替代的作用。然而近年来美国、欧洲等地出现蜂群大量消失的迹象,给农业经济带来严重威胁。近年来人们逐渐发现蜂肠道微生物与维持宿主健康之间存在着联系,蜜蜂属(Apis)和熊蜂属(Bombus)个体都带有简单、特异的肠道菌群,并且蜂肠道菌群与人类等其他动物具有诸多相似之处,例如其通过社会性接触稳定传播的特性。本综述介绍了近年来通过体外培养、高通量测序等技术对蜂肠道微生物与宿主关系的研究,特别是其简化的菌群结构、宿主特异性,及其对蜜蜂食物消化、营养供给、病虫抵抗等方面的作用,并探讨了未来基于我国特有蜂种研究的方向,及蜜蜂作为优良的社会性动物模式体系对未来人类营养健康研究的可行性。     

蝗虫肠道微生物研究进展

蝗虫自古以来是我国农林牧业的一大害虫,蝗虫聚集成灾对农业造成了巨大的损失,国内外学者也因此对其进行了深入的研究。随着科研工作者对昆虫肠道微生态学理论的逐渐重视,蝗虫的肠道微生物也成为了研究的重点,同时测序技术的迅速发展促进了蝗虫肠道微生物的研究。本文从蝗虫肠道菌群的多样性、功能及研究方法入手,对近年来蝗虫肠道微生物的研究进展进行总结,并对今后的研究进行展望。     

洞察景观环境影响蜜蜂之新视角: 肠道微生物

作为生态服务提供者的传粉蜜蜂与景观生态息息相关, 而以农田为主的景观组成显著降低了传粉蜜蜂的多样性。目前调查研究显示, 农田的扩张与蜜蜂多样性下降相关, 且农药残留对蜜蜂损害严重。景观中的开花植物决定了蜜蜂的食物(营养)组成, 其中花粉蛋白含量与蜜蜂的生长发育紧密相关。尽管研究已证实景观环境会显著影响蜜蜂蜂群的发展和个体的生长繁殖能力, 但未来还需要加强景观组成变化直接作用于蜜蜂的机制研究。另一方面, 大量研究表明蜜蜂肠道共生菌是影响宿主健康的重要因素: 可促进宿主吸收营养和抵抗病原菌。作为传粉者, 蜜蜂接触到的主要外部环境——花粉和花蜜都含有特殊的微生物, 很多研究暗示花源微生物是蜜蜂肠道菌来源之一。研究表明景观环境相关的食物(营养)、农药残留以及环境微生物都会显著影响肠道微生物。现有少量的研究证明不同景观的蜜蜂肠道微生物有差异, 景观环境可能通过作用于蜜蜂肠道微生物进而影响蜜蜂健康。然而不同景观环境中的微生物, 尤其是花源微生物和蜜蜂肠道菌之间的关联有待证明。景观对蜜蜂肠道微生物的影响值得研究, 希望可以从肠道菌的视角鉴别对蜜蜂友好的景观环境, 进而指导土地合理利用和蜜蜂保护。     

蜜蜂肠道菌群定殖研究进展

肠道菌群在其宿主健康中发挥着各种各样的重要功能。蜜蜂是高度社会化的昆虫,其肠道菌群与大多数昆虫明显不同,由兼性厌氧和微好氧的细菌组成,具有高度保守性和专门的核心肠道微生物群。近年来的研究表明,蜜蜂肠道微生物群在代谢、免疫功能、生长发育以及保护机体免受病原体侵袭等方面起着重要作用,并已证实肠道微生物在蜜蜂健康和疾病中起着重要作用,肠道微生物群的破坏对蜜蜂健康会产生不利影响。本文综述了蜜蜂肠道菌群的特征及菌群定殖研究进展,介绍了蜜蜂的日龄、群体、季节等对蜜蜂肠道菌群定殖的影响,探讨了宿主的功能和新陈代谢对肠道菌群的影响。     

蜜蜂肠道菌群结构功能研究进展

在长期的共同进化中,肠道菌群与其宿主形成了紧密的联系,为宿主提供了许多有益的作用。作为一种社会性昆虫,蜜蜂的生活习性为其肠道菌群提供了良好而稳定的传播途径,因此,蜜蜂与其肠道菌群形成了一种紧密的互惠互利共生关系。近年来,随着对蜜蜂肠道菌群了解的不断加深,对蜜蜂肠道菌群功能的研究也不断深入,大量研究表明蜜蜂的肠道菌群在宿主食物的消化代谢、宿主免疫的激活和抵抗致病菌、调节宿主生理等方面都有着重要的作用,同时破坏肠道菌群的稳定对蜜蜂的健康有着明显的负面影响。本文对近年来西方蜜蜂肠道菌群功能研究进行了总结,旨在为进一步深入探索蜜蜂肠道菌群与其宿主的相互作用及在养蜂生产上应用肠道菌群防控疾病提供参考。     

常见疾病、抗生素及农药对意大利蜜蜂(Apis mellifera ligustica)肠道微生物多样性的影响研究进展

蜜蜂是对农业生产十分重要的授粉昆虫。蜜蜂肠道微生物与蜜蜂健康有密切关系,但肠道微生物也会受多种外界因素的影响。本文就蜜蜂疾病、抗生素等蜂病治疗药物、农药,以及益生菌的应用等对意大利蜜蜂工蜂肠道微生物影响的研究进行了归纳总结,并对蜜蜂与其肠道菌关系研究进行了展望。     

白蚁肠道微生物研究方法概述

白蚁是木质纤维素的主要降解者,在森林生态系统碳氮循环过程中发挥着重要作用。白蚁肠道共生微生物主要包括原生生物、细菌、古菌和真菌。在白蚁对木质纤维素进行降解、发酵,从而产生乙酸、氢气和甲烷以及对氮的固定过程中,白蚁肠道共生微生物起着重要的作用。本文对白蚁肠道微生物的研究方法进行总结,概述了各种方法的优缺点,同时对肠道微生物的研究进展进行了总结,以期为白蚁肠道微生物的进一步研究和利用提供参考。     

蜜蜂肠道菌群的培养方法及特性研究进展

肠道菌群在蜜蜂的消化、营养和抗病性等方面发挥了很多潜在的益生作用。为了加深对以蜜蜂为主的传粉昆虫肠道菌群的了解,本文综述了蜜蜂肠道菌群的人工厌氧培养方法及特性,重点综述了Snodgrassella属、Gilliamella属、Frischella属、Lactobacillus属、Bifidobacterium属和Alpha-1,Alpha-2厌氧细菌类群。旨在通过特定的培养方法获取纯培养的细菌,以供进一步研究特定肠道菌群与特定功能的直接联系。希望这些培养技术能帮助大家提升对蜜蜂肠道共生菌在蜜蜂营养和健康方面所起的作用有所了解。     

蜜蜂肠道微生物与其社会性的关系

蜜蜂是一种典型的营群居生活的社会性昆虫,相比独居生活的昆虫,其肠道微生物具有独特的区系结构。这种独特肠道微生物与其社会性之间的关系是一个重要的科学问题。现有研究显示,蜜蜂肠道的优势菌包括9大类群。消化道不同区段的优势菌种类和丰度存在差异。主要表现为前肠种类少、丰度低、后肠种类多、数量大,占了全消化道微生物的99%以上。不同社会分工的蜜蜂肠道微生物区系结构存在差异,肠道微生物会通过影响胰岛素信号的传导、保幼激素和卵黄原蛋白的合成以及蜜蜂抗氧化应激的能力等对蜜蜂的级型分化、社会分工、摄食行为及寿命长短产生调节作用。除此之外,蜜蜂肠道微生物还具有激活免疫、抑制病原菌生长、降解食物、促进养分吸收、解毒、发酵蜂蜜和蜂粮等作用。主要针对蜜蜂肠道微生物的基本特征及其与蜜蜂社会性的关系作一简要综述。     

Gut microbiota composition is associated with environmental landscape in honey bees

There is growing recognition that the gut microbial community regulates a wide variety of important functions in its animal hosts, including host health. However, the complex interactions between gut microbes and environment are still unclear. Honey bees are ecologically and economically important pollinators that host a core gut microbial community that is thought to be constant across populations. Here, we examined whether the composition of the gut microbial community of honey bees is affected by the environmental landscape the bees are exposed to. We placed honey bee colonies reared under identical conditions in two main landscape types for 6 weeks: either oilseed rape farmland or agricultural farmland distant to fields of flowering oilseed rape. The gut bacterial communities of adult bees from the colonies were then characterized and compared based on amplicon sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene. While previous studies have delineated a characteristic core set of bacteria inhabiting the honey bee gut, our results suggest that the broad environment that bees are exposed to has some influence on the relative abundance of some members of that microbial community. This includes known dominant taxa thought to have functions in nutrition and health. Our results provide evidence for an influence of landscape exposure on honey bee microbial community and highlight the potential effect of exposure to different environmental parameters, such as forage type and neonicotinoid pesticides, on key honey bee gut bacteria. This work emphasizes the complexity of the relationship between the host, its gut bacteria, and the environment and identifies target microbial taxa for functional analyses.     

A simple and distinctive microbiota associated with honey bees and bumble bees

Specialized relationships with bacteria often allow animals to exploit a new diet by providing a novel set of metabolic capabilities. Bees are a monophyletic group of Hymenoptera that transitioned to a completely herbivorous diet from the carnivorous diet of their wasp ancestors. Recent culture-independent studies suggest that a set of distinctive bacterial species inhabits the gut of the honey bee, Apis mellifera. Here we survey the gut microbiotae of diverse bee and wasp species to test whether acquisition of these bacteria was associated with the transition to herbivory in bees generally. We found that most bee species lack phylotypes that are the same or similar to those typical of A. mellifera, rejecting the hypothesis that this dietary transition was symbiont-dependent. The most common bacteria in solitary bee species are a widespread phylotype of Burkholderia and the pervasive insect associate, Wolbachia. In contrast, several social representatives of corbiculate bees do possess distinctive bacterial phylotypes. Samples of A. mellifera harboured the same microbiota as in previous surveys, and closely related bacterial phylotypes were identified in two Asian honey bees (Apis andreniformis and Apis dorsata) and several bumble bee (Bombus) species. Potentially, the sociality of Apis and Bombus species facilitates symbiont transmission and thus is key to the maintenance of a more consistent gut microbiota. Phylogenetic analyses provide a more refined taxonomic placement of the A. mellifera symbionts.     

Distinctive gut microbiota of honey bees assessed using deep sampling from individual worker bees

Surveys of 16S rDNA sequences from the honey bee, Apis mellifera, have revealed the presence of eight distinctive bacterial phylotypes in intestinal tracts of adult worker bees. Because previous studies have been limited to relatively few sequences from samples pooled from multiple hosts, the extent of variation in this microbiota among individuals within and between colonies and locations has been unclear. We surveyed the gut microbiota of 40 individual workers from two sites, Arizona and Maryland USA, sampling four colonies per site. Universal primers were used to amplify regions of 16S ribosomal RNA genes, and amplicons were sequenced using 454 pyrotag methods, enabling analysis of about 330,000 bacterial reads. Over 99% of these sequences belonged to clusters for which the first blastn hits in GenBank were members of the known bee phylotypes. Four phylotypes, one within Gammaproteobacteria (corresponding to "Candidatus Gilliamella apicola") one within Betaproteobacteria ("Candidatus Snodgrassella alvi"), and two within Lactobacillus, were present in every bee, though their frequencies varied. The same typical bacterial phylotypes were present in all colonies and at both sites. Community profiles differed significantly among colonies and between sites, mostly due to the presence in some Arizona colonies of two species of Enterobacteriaceae not retrieved previously from bees. Analysis of Sanger sequences of rRNA of the Snodgrassella and Gilliamella phylotypes revealed that single bees contain numerous distinct strains of each phylotype. Strains showed some differentiation between localities, especially for the Snodgrassella phylotype.     

Gluconobacters from honey bees

Fifty-sixGluconobacter strains and oneAcetobacter strain were isolated from honey bees and their environment in three different regions in Belgium and identified phenotypically. Polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis of the soluble cell proteins showed that two different types exist within theGluconobacter isolates: strains from type A were found in samples of the three regions, whereas strains from type B were only isolated in two of the three regions. Both types could occur in bees from the same region, from several hives of one bee keeper and from one hive. Strains from type A were almost identical with collection strainG. oxydans subsp.suboxydans NCIB 9018, whereas strains from type B consituted a new protein electrophoretic type within the genusGluconobacter. AlthoughGluconobacter is apparently associated with honey bees, it is not known whether it is important or required for the bees or any hive product.     

Pattern learning by honey bees

Honey bees learn to recognize flowers on the basis of their odour, colour, and pattern. Previous work had suggested that a flower's pattern is remembered by virtue of several abstract parameters such as spatial frequency, rather than as pictures, but the evidence was not conclusive. New experiments strongly suggest that bees can remember patterns as low-resolution pictures; the resolution is roughly 10°. Control experiments further indicate that flower learning can also involve conditioned inhibition.