Effect of pelvis impact angle on stresses at the femoral neck during falls

Improved understanding is required of how the mechanics of the fall affect hip fracture risk. We used a hip impact simulator to determine how peak stresses at the femoral neck were affected by pelvis impact angle, hip abductor muscle force, and use of a wearable hip protector.We simulated falls from standing (2 m/s impact velocity) involving initial hip abductor muscle forces of 700 or 300 N. Trials were acquired for impact to the lateral aspect of the greater trochanter, and impact to the pelvis rotated 5°, 10° and 15° anteriorly (positive) or posteriorly (negative). Measures were acquired with and without a commercially available hip protector. During trials, we measured three-dimensional forces with a load cell at the femoral neck, and derived peak compressive and tensile stresses.Peak compressive stress increased 37% (5.91 versus 4.31 MPa; p < 0.0005) and peak tensile stress increased 209% (2.31 versus 0.75 MPa; p < 0.0005) when the pelvis impact angle changed from 15° anterior to −15° posterior. For lateral impacts, the peak tensile and compressive stresses averaged 73% and 8% lower, respectively, in the 700 N than 300 N muscle force condition, but the effect was reversed for anteriolateral or posteriolateral impacts. The attenuation in peak compressive stress from the hip protector was greatest for posteriolateral impacts (−15 to −5°; 36–41%), and least for anteriolateral (+15°; 10%).These results clarify the effects on hip fracture risk during a fall of pelvis impact angle and muscle forces, and should inform the design of improved hip protectors.     

Can martial arts techniques reduce fall severity? An in vivo study of femoral loading configurations in sideways falls

Sideways falls onto the hip are a major cause of femoral fractures in the elderly. Martial arts (MA) fall techniques decrease hip impact forces in sideways falls. The femoral fracture risk, however, also depends on the femoral loading configuration (direction and point of application of the force). The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of fall techniques, landing surface and fall height on the impact force and the loading configuration in sideways falls. Twelve experienced judokas performed sideways MA and Block ('natural') falls on a force plate, both with and without a judo mat on top. Kinematic and force data were analysed to determine the hip impact force and the loading configuration. In falls from a kneeling position, the MA technique reduced the impact force by 27%, but did not change the loading configuration. The use of the mat did not change the loading configuration. Falling from a standing changed the force direction. In all conditions, the point of application was distal and posterior to the greater trochanter, but it was less distal and more posterior in falls from standing than from kneeling position. The present decrease in hip impact force with an unchanged loading configuration indicates the potential protective effect of the MA technique on the femoral fracture risk. The change in loading configuration with an increased fall height warrant further studies to examine the effect of MA techniques on fall severity under more natural fall circumstances.     

Reliability of impact forces, hip angles and velocities during simulated forward falls using a novel Propelled Upper Limb fall ARrest Impact System (PULARIS)

Previous forward fall simulation methods have provided good kinematic and kinetic data, but are limited in that they have started the falls from a stationary position and have primarily simulated uni-directional motion. Therefore, a novel Propelled Upper Limb fall ARest Impact System (PULARIS) was designed to address these issues during assessments of a variety of fall scenarios. The purpose of this study was to present PULARIS and evaluate its ability to impact the upper extremities of participants with repeatable velocities, hand forces and hip angles in postures and with vertical and horizontal motion consistent with forward fall arrest. PULARIS consists of four steel tubing crossbars in a scissor-like arrangement that ride on metal trolleys within c-channel tracks in the ceiling. Participants are suspended beneath PULARIS by the legs and torso in a prone position and propelled horizontally via a motor and chain drive until they are quick released, and then impact floor-mounted force platforms with both hands. PULARIS velocity, hip angles and velocities and impact hand forces of ten participants (five male, five female) were collected during three fall types (straight-arm, self-selected and bent-arm) and two fall heights (0.05 m and 0.10 m) to assess the reliability of the impact conditions provided by the system. PULARIS and participant hip velocities were found to be quite repeatable (mean ICC?=?0.81) with small between trial errors (mean?=?0.03 m/s). The ratio of horizontal to vertical hip velocity components (~0.75) agreed well with previously reported data (0.70-0.80). Peak vertical hand impact forces were also found to be relatively consistent between trials with a mean ICC of 0.73 and mean between trial error of 13.4 N. Up to 83% of the horizontal hand impact forces displayed good to excellent reliability (ICC?>?0.6) with small between trial differences. Finally, the ICCs for between trial hip angles were all classified as good to excellent. Overall, PULARIS is a reliable method and is appropriate for studying the response of the distal upper extremity to impact loading during non-stationary, multi-directional movements indicative of a forward fall. This system performed well at different fall heights, and allows for a variety of upper and lower extremity, and hip postures to be tested successfully in different landing scenarios consistent with elderly and sport-related falls.     

Wrist impact velocities are smaller in forward falls than backward falls from standing

The wrist is a common fracture site for both young and older adults. The purpose of this study was to compare wrist kinematics in backward and forward falls with different fall protective responses. We carried out within-subject comparison of impact velocities and maximum velocities during descent of the distal radius among three different fall configurations: (a) backward falls with knees flexed, (b) backward falls with knees extended and (c) forward falls with knees flexed. We also examined the effect of fall configuration on fall durations, elbow flexion, trunk flexion and forearm angles at impact. Forward falls resulted in smaller impact velocities of the distal radius, longer fall duration, longer braking duration, greater elbow flexion and more horizontal landing position of the forearm compared to backward falls. The distal radius impact velocity during forward falls (1.33 m/s) was significantly lower than in backward falls, and among the backward falls the impact velocity of the flexed knee strategy (2.01 m/s) was significantly lower than the extended knee strategy (2.27 m/s). These impact velocities were significantly reduced from the maximum velocities observed during descent (forward falls=3.57 m/s, backward falls with knee flexed=3.16 m/s, backward falls with knees extended=3.52 m/s). We conclude that (1) smaller impact velocities of the wrists in forward falls could imply a lower fracture risk compared to backward falls, and (2) fall protective responses reduced wrist impact velocities in all fall directions.     

The effect of positioning on the biomechanical performance of soft shell hip protectors

Wearable hip protectors represent a promising strategy for reducing risk for hip fracture from a sideways fall. However, small changes in pad positioning may influence their protective benefit. Using a mechanical hip impact simulator, we investigated how three marketed soft shell hip protectors attenuate and redistribute the impact force applied to the hip, and how this depends on displacement from their intended position by 2.5 or 5 cm superiorly, posteriorly, inferiorly or anteriorly. For centrally-placed protectors, peak pressure was reduced 93% below the unpadded value by a 16 mm horseshoe-shaped protector, 93% by a 14 mm horseshoe protector, and 94% by a 16 mm continuous protector. In unpadded trials, 83% of the total force was applied to the skin overlying the proximal femur (danger zone). This was lowered to 19% by the centrally placed 16 mm horseshoe protector, to 34% by the 14 mm horseshoe, and to 40% by the 16 mm continuous protector. Corresponding reductions in peak force delivered to the femoral neck (relative to unpadded) were 45%, 38%, and 20%, respectively. The protective benefit of all three protectors decreased with pad displacement. For example, displacement of protectors by 5 cm anteriorly caused peak femoral neck force to increase 60% above centrally-placed values, and approach unpadded values. These results indicate that soft shell hip protectors provide substantial protective benefits, but decline in performance with small displacements from their intended position. Our findings confirm the need for correct and stable positioning of hip protectors in garment design.     

Could martial arts fall training be safe for persons with osteoporosis?: a feasibility study

Background

Osteoporosis is a well-established risk factor for fall-related hip fractures. Training fall arrest strategies, such as martial arts (MA) fall techniques, might be useful to prevent hip fractures in persons with osteoporosis, provided that the training itself is safe. This study was conducted to determine whether MA fall training would be safe for persons with osteoporosis extrapolated from the data of young adults and using stringent safety criteria.

Methods

Young adults performed sideways and forward MA falls from a kneeling position on both a judo mat and a mattress as well as from a standing position on a mattress. Hip impact forces and kinematic data were collected. For each condition, the highest hip impact force was compared with two safety criteria based on the femoral fracture load and the use of a hip protector.

Results

The highest hip impact force during the various fall conditions ranged between 1426 N and 3132 N. Sideways falls from a kneeling and standing position met the safety criteria if performed on the mattress (max 1426 N and 2012 N, respectively) but not if the falls from a kneeling position were performed on the judo mat (max 2219 N). Forward falls only met the safety criteria if performed from a kneeling position on the mattress (max 2006 N). Hence, forward falls from kneeling position on a judo mat (max 2474 N) and forward falls from standing position on the mattress (max 3132 N) did not meet both safety criteria.

Conclusions

Based on the data of young adults and safety criteria, the MA fall training was expected to be safe for persons with osteoporosis if appropriate safety measures are taken: during the training persons with osteoporosis should wear hip protectors that could attenuate the maximum hip impact force by at least 65%, perform the fall exercises on a thick mattress, and avoid forward fall exercises from a standing position. Hence, a modified MA fall training might be useful to reduce hip fracture risk in persons with osteoporosis.

     

Soft tissue stiffness over the hip increases with age and its implication in hip fracture risk in older adults

Risk of hip fracture depends on the bone strength as well as the impact force delivered to the proximal femur during falls, and femoral soft tissue may help to reduce the hip fracture risk by attenuating the impact force. Femoral soft tissue stiffness was measured from a large sample, and compared how this was affected by age, gender and site.One hundred fifty healthy individuals (fifty-two young (aged between 19 and 29), forty-eight middle-aged (30–64), and fifty old (over 65)) participated. Each age group included an equal number of males and females. Using an automated hand-held indentation device, soft tissue stiffness was measured over twelve sites with respect to the greater trochanter (GT).For both left and right hips, the stiffness was associated with age (p < 0.0005), gender (p < 0.0005), and site (p < 0.0005). On average, the stiffness was 26% greater in older than young adults (321.5 versus 254.3 N/m). On average across twelve sites, the regression analysis indicated that the stiffness increases 1.33 N/m every year (“soft tissue stiffness over the hip = 1.33*age + 221.8”; R = 0.518, p < 0.0005). Furthermore, the stiffness was 18% greater in male than female (308.8 versus 262.6 N/m), and differed across twelve sites over the hip, being greatest (424.2 N/m) at the GT, and least (206.3 N/m) at the superior gluteal region.The results provide insights into the shock absorbing property of soft tissue over the hip, and inform the improvement of fall-related injury prevention interventions (i.e., hip protector, safe landing strategies) in older adults.     

Development of biomechanical response corridors of the thorax to blunt ballistic impacts

Human responses are critical to understanding injury biomechanics in blunt ballistic impacts, which are defined as 20-200 g projectiles impacting at 20-250 m/s. 13 human cadavers were exposed to three distinct ballistic impacts of the chest to determine force-time, deflection-time and force-deflection responses. Comparisons were made between biomechanical responses for ballistic impacts and those previously reported for lower speed, higher mass impacts. Impact condition B (140 g at 40 m/s) gave the largest peak force 10,602+/-2226 N and deflection 54.7+/-14.6 mm. Impact condition A (140 g at 20 m/s) involved lower impact energy and produced lower peak force 3383+/-761 N and deflection 25.9+/-3.1 mm, as did impact condition C (40 g at 60 m/s), which gave 3158+/-309 N and 20.1+/-7.8 mm. The results indicate each impact condition gives distinctive responses, which differ from those previously reported in the automotive literature for lower speed impacts. This information provides the foundation for future biomechanical research in the area of blunt ballistic impacts, specifically the development of test surrogates and evaluation of protective equipment.     

Pelvis and femur geometry: Relationships with impact characteristics during sideways falls on the hip

While metrics of pelvis and femur geometry have been demonstrated to influence hip fracture risk, attempts at linking geometry to underlying mechanisms have focused on fracture strength. We investigated the potential effects of femur and pelvis geometry on applied loads during lateral falls on the hip. Fifteen female volunteers underwent DXA imaging to characterize two pelvis and six femur geometric features. Additionally, participants completed low-energy sideways falls on the hip; peak impact force and pressure, contact area, and moment of force applied to the proximal femur were extracted. No geometric feature was significantly associated with peak impact force. Peak moment of force was significantly associated with femur moment arm (p = 0.005). Peak pressure was positively correlated with pelvis width and femur moment arm (p < 0.05), while contact area was negatively correlated with metrics of pelvis width and femur neck length (p < 0.05). This is the first study to link experimental measures of impact loads during sideways falls with image-based skeletal geometry from human volunteers. The results suggest that while skeletal geometry has limited effects on overall peak impact force during sideways falls, it does influence how impact loads are distributed at the skin surface, in addition to the bending moment applied to the proximal femur. These findings have implications for the design of protective interventions (e.g. wearable hip protectors), and for models of fall-related lateral impacts that could incorporate the relationships between skeletal geometry, external load magnitude/distribution, and tissue-level femur loads.     

The relation between hip impact velocity and hip impact force differs between sideways fall techniques.

Fall techniques that reduce fall severity may decrease the risk of hip fractures. A fundamental variable for fall severity is impact force, but impact velocity is also used. The purpose of the study was to determine whether impact velocity is valid to determine differences in fall severity between different techniques. Five young adults with martial arts (MA) experience performed sideways falls from kneeling height using three techniques: Block with arm (Block) and MA techniques with and without use of the arm to break the fall. In addition, one subject also performed MA falls from standing height. Linear regression analysis showed a moderate relation between hip impact velocity and force, which was depended on technique. In falls with comparable impact velocities, forces in MA falls were lower than forces in Block falls. Hence, differences in impact force could not be predicted by velocity. In conclusion, hip impact velocity may be useful to make an approximate prediction of impact force within fall techniques. However, to determine differences between techniques it was not always a valid predictor. When direct impact force measurements are not possible, methods combining impact velocity with energy estimates before and after impact might be more valid.     

Reducing hip fracture risk during sideways falls: evidence in young adults of the protective effects of impact to the hands and stepping

Hip fracture is rare in young adults, despite evidence that the energy available in a fall is sufficient to fracture the young proximal femur. This might be explained by protective responses that allow young individuals to avoid hip impact during sideways falls. To test this hypothesis, we conducted experiments with 44 individuals (31 women and 13 men) aged 19-26 years, who were instructed to try to maintain balance after a sudden unpredictable sideways translation was applied to the platform they stood upon. While the surface adjacent to the platform was formed of gymnasium mats, we provided no information on surface compliance, or the direction and speed of the perturbation. Ninety percent of participants fell and impacted the pelvis, and 98% of those cases involved direct impact to the hip region. Impact occurred to the hand in 98% of falls, and preceded impact to the pelvis by 50 ms on average (SD=40, range=-12-175 ms). The impact velocity of the pelvis decreased 3.6% for every 10 ms increase in the interval between hand and pelvis impact, and was reduced by 22% on average by stepping prior to impact. Our results suggest that the lack of hip fractures in young adults cannot be explained by avoidance of hip impact during sideways falls. Rather, it probably relates to use of the hands and stepping, and by simply possessing sufficient bone strength to withstand the direct blow to the greater trochanter that tends to accompany sideways falls.     

Prediction of femoral impact forces in falls on the hip.

A major determinant of the risk of hip fracture in a fall from standing height is the force applied to the femur at impact. This force is determined by the impact velocity of the hip and the effective mass, stiffness, and damping of the body at the moment of contact. We have developed a simple experiment (the pelvis release experiment) to measure the effective stiffness and damping of the body when a step change in force is applied to the lateral aspect of the hip. Results from pelvis release experiments with 14 human subjects suggest that both increased soft tissue thickness over the hip and impacting the ground in a relaxed state can decrease the effective stiffness of the body, and subsequently reduce peak impact forces. Comparison between our fall impact force predictions and in-vitro measures of femoral fracture strength suggest that any fall from standing height producing direct, lateral impact on the greater trochanter can fracture the elderly hip.     

Effect of pre-impact movement strategies on the impact forces resulting from a lateral fall

Approximately 90% of hip fractures in older adults result from falls, mostly from landing on or near the hip. A three-dimensional, 11-segment, forward dynamic biomechanical model was developed to investigate whether segment movement strategies prior to impact can affect the impact forces resulting from a lateral fall. Four different pre-impact movement strategies, with and without using the ipsilateral arm to break the fall, were implemented using paired actuators representing the agonist and antagonist muscles acting about each joint. Proportional-derivative feedback controller controlled joint angles and velocities so as to minimize risk of fracture at any of the impact sites. It was hypothesized that (a) the use of active knee, hip and arm joint torques during the pre-contact phase affects neither the whole body kinetic energy at impact nor the peak impact forces on the knee, hip or shoulder and (b) muscle strength and reaction time do not substantially affect peak impact forces. The results demonstrate that, compared with falling laterally as a rigid body, an arrest strategy that combines flexion of the lower extremities, ground contact with the side of the lower leg along with an axial rotation to progressively present the posterolateral aspects of the thigh, pelvis and then torso, can reduce the peak hip impact force by up to 56%. A 30% decline in muscle strength did not markedly affect the effectiveness of that fall strategy. However, a 300-ms delay in implementing the movement strategy inevitably caused hip impact forces consistent with fracture unless the arm was used to break the fall prior to the hip impact.     

Martial arts fall techniques decrease the impact forces at the hip during sideways falling

Falls to the side and those with impact on the hip are risky for hip fractures in the elderly. A previous study has indicated that martial arts (MA) fall techniques can reduce hip impact force, but the underlying mechanism is unknown. Furthermore, the high impact forces at the hand used to break the fall have raised concerns because of the risk for wrist fractures. The purpose of the study was to get insight into the role of hand impact, impact velocity, and trunk orientation in the reduction of hip impact force in MA techniques. Six experienced judokas performed sideways falls from kneeling height using three fall techniques: block with arm technique (control), MA technique with use of the arm to break the fall (MA-a), and MA technique without use of the arm (MA-na). The results showed that the MA-a and MA-na technique reduced the impact force by 27.5% and 30%, respectively. Impact velocity was significantly reduced in the MA falls. Trunk orientation was significantly less vertical in the MA-a falls. No significant differences were found between the MA techniques. It was concluded that the reduction in hip impact force was associated with a lower impact velocity and less vertical trunk orientation. Rolling after impact, which is characteristic for MA falls, is likely to contribute to the reduction of impact forces, as well. Using the arm to break the fall was not essential for the MA technique to reduce hip impact force. These findings provided support for the incorporation of MA fall techniques in fall prevention programs for elderly.     

Disturbance type and gait speed affect fall direction and impact location

Since falling to the side and impacting on or near the hip increase hip fracture risk, we examined the fall direction and pelvis impact location resulting from four disturbances (faint, slip, step down, trip) at three gait speeds (fast, normal, slow) in 14 young adults instructed not to attempt recovery. We hypothesized that certain disturbances such as faints and slips and slow walking speed were more likely to result in an impact on the hip. For each trial, the fall direction, impact location and pelvis impact velocity were measured. The results showed that both disturbance type and gait speed significantly affected fall direction and impact location (analysis of covariance with repeated measures, p< or =0.0001) with a significant interaction (p<0.05). Trips and steps down usually resulted in forward falls, with frontal impacts regardless of gait speed. At fast gait speed, slips and faints also usually resulted in forward falls, with frontal impacts. As gait speed decreased, however, slips usually resulted in sideways or backward falls, with impact on the hip or buttocks, and faints resulted in a greater number of sideways falls, with impact near the hip. Therefore, compared to other disturbances and gait speeds, slipping or fainting while walking slowly was more likely to result in an impact on the hip, suggesting a greater risk for hip fracture. Furthermore, 56% of the impact velocities generated were within one standard deviation of the estimate of the mean impact velocity needed to fracture an elderly femur.     

An analysis of the effect of lower extremity strength on impact severity during a backward fall.

At least 280 000 hip fractures occur annually in the U.S. at an estimated cost of $9 billion. While over 90 percent of these are caused by falls, only about 2 percent of all falls result in hip fracture. Evidence suggests that the most important determinants of hip fracture risk during a fall are the body's impact velocity and configuration. Accordingly, protective responses for reducing impact velocity and the likelihood for direct impact to the hip, strongly influence fracture risk. One method for reducing the body's impact velocity and kinetic energy during a fall is to absorb energy in the lower extremity muscles during descent, as occurs during sitting and squatting. In the present study, we employed a series of in verted pendulum models to determine: (a) the theoretical effect of this mechanism on impact severity during a backward fall, and (b) the effect on impact severity of age-related declines (or exercise-induced enhancements) in lower extremity strength. Compared to the case of a fall with zero energy absorption in the lower extremity joints, best-case falls (which involved 81 percent activation of ankle and hip muscles, but only 23 percent activation of knees muscles) involved 79 percent attenuation (from 352 J to 74 J) in the body's vertical kinetic energy at impact (KEv), and 48 percent attenuation (from 3.22 to 1.68 m/s) in the downward velocity of the pelvis at impact (v(v)). Among the mechanisms responsible for this were: (1) eccentric contraction of lower extremity muscles during descent, which resulted in up to 150 J of energy absorption; (2) impact with the trunk in an upright configuration, which reduced the change in potential energy associated with the fall by 100 J; and (3) knee extension during the final stage of descent, which "transferred" up to 90 J of impact energy into horizontal (as opposed to vertical) kinetic energy. Declines in joint strength reduced the effectiveness of mechanisms (1) and (3), and thereby increased impact severity However, even with reductions of 80 percent in available torques, KEv was attenuated by 50 percent. This indicates the importance of both technique and strength in reducing impact severity. These results provide motivation for attempts to reduce elderly individuals' risk for fall-related injury through the combination of instruction in safe falling techniques and exercises that enhance lower extremity strength.     

Characterizing the effective stiffness of the pelvis during sideways falls on the hip

The force applied to the proximal femur during a fall, and thus hip fracture risk, is dependent on the effective stiffness of the body during impact. Accurate estimates of pelvis stiffness are required to predict fracture risk in a fall. However, the dynamic force–deflection properties of the human pelvis have never been measured in-vivo. Our objectives were to (1) measure the force–deflection properties of the pelvis during lateral impact to the hip, and (2) determine whether the accuracy of a mass-spring model of impact in predicting peak force depends on the characterization of non-linearities in stiffness. We used a sling and electromagnet to release the participant’s pelvis from heights up to 5 cm, simulating low-severity sideways falls. We measured applied loads with a force plate, and pelvis deformation with a motion capture system. In the 5 cm trials peak force averaged 1004 (SD 115) N and peak deflection averaged 26.3 (5.1) mm. We observed minimal non-linearities in pelvic force–deflection properties characterized by an 8% increase in the coefficient of determination for non-linear compared to linear regression equations fit to the data. Our model consistently overestimated peak force (by 49%) when using a non-linear stiffness equation, while a piece-wise non-linear fit (non-linear for low forces, linear for loads exceeding 300 N) predicted peak force to within 1% at our highest drop height. This study has important implications for mathematical and physical models of falls, including mechanical systems that assess the biomechanical effectiveness of protective devices aimed at reducing hip fracture risk.     

Protective movements during sideways falls from standing height

To examine the effect of protective movements during sideways falls from standing height (i.e., from the standing position), a two-step study was performed. In the first step, 80 young male and female volunteers freely fell onto a sport-mat. All falls were recorded on videotape, and replayed to analyze movements in response to the falls. Several protective movements were observed; forward flexion and lateral flexion were observed with a particularly high frequency. In the second step, impact velocities of the head and hip were measured by a three-dimensional motion analyzer regarding three types of falls: stiff falls, forward flexion falls and lateral flexion falls. Both types of flexion reduced impact velocities of the head, but not those of the hip. The reduction of the impact velocity on the head correlated with the lowering of the height of the head from the floor.     

Active responses decrease impact forces at the hip and shoulder in falls to the side.

Active responses, such as using the arm to break the fall, may be an effective means of decreasing likelihood of injury in a fall and may help explain why only a small percentage of falls result in a fracture. We quantified the impact force at the hip and shoulder in falls to the side from a kneeling position under three conditions: (1) attempting to break the fall by using an arm; (2) falling with the body relaxed; and (3) falling with the body tensed. Subjects fell from a kneeling position onto a force platform array covered with foam padding and impact force data were recorded. The ground reaction force-time curve was generally bimodal due to sequential impacts of the hip and shoulder. Impact forces at the hip and shoulder were 12 and 16% less for the slap condition (p < 0.05) than for the tensed condition. The impact forces for the relaxed and tensed conditions were not significantly different, although impact forces tended to be less in the relaxed condition. We concluded that active responses reduce the impact forces experienced at the hip and shoulder in falls to the side. Decreased effectiveness of protective responses, due to increases in reaction time and decreases in strength with age, may help explain why so many hip fractures occur in the elderly but so few occur in younger people.     

The influence of muscle activation on impact dynamics during lateral falls on the hip

Muscle activation has been demonstrated to influence impact dynamics during scenarios including running, automotive impacts, and head impacts. This study investigated the effects of targeted muscle activation magnitude on impact dynamics during low energy falls on the hip with human volunteers. Fifteen university-aged participants (eight females, seven males) underwent 12 lateral pelvis release trials. Half of the trials were muscle-‘relaxed’; in the remaining ‘contracted’ trials participants isometrically contracted their gluteus medius to 20–30% of maximal voluntary contraction before the drop was initiated onto a force plate. Peak force applied to the femur-pelvis complex averaged 9.3% higher in contracted compared to relaxed trials (F = 6.798, p = .022). Muscle activation effects were greater for females, resulting in (on average) an 18.5% increase in effective pelvic stiffness (F = 5.838, p = .046) and a 23.4% decrease in time-to-peak-force (F = 5.109, p = .042). In the relaxed trials, muscle activation naturally increased during the impact event, reaching levels of 12.8, 7.5, 11.1, and 19.1% MVC at the time of peak force for the gluteus medias, vastus lateralis, erector spinae, and external oblique, respectively. These findings demonstrated that contraction of trunk and hip musculature increased peak impact force across sexes. In females, increases in the magnitude and rate of loading were accompanied (and likely driven) by increases in system stiffness. Accordingly, incorporating muscle activation contributions into biomechanical models that investigate loading dynamics in the femur and/or pelvis during lateral impacts may improve estimate accuracy.