Evidence for a shared structural role for HMG1 and linker histones B4 and H1 in organizing chromatin.

The high mobility group proteins 1 and 2 (HMG1/2) and histone B4 are major components of chromatin within the nuclei assembled during the incubation of Xenopus sperm chromatin in Xenopus egg extract. To investigate their potential structural and functional roles, we have cloned and expressed Xenopus HMG1 and histone B4. Purified histone B4 and HMG1 form stable complexes with nucleosomes including Xenopus 5S DNA. Both proteins associate with linker DNA and stabilize it against digestion with micrococcal nuclease, in a similar manner to histone H1. However, neither histone B4 nor HMG1 influence the DNase I or hydroxyl radical digestion of DNA within the nucleosome core. We suggest that HMG1/2 and histone B4 have a shared structural role in organizing linker DNA in the nucleosome.     

Interaction of non-histone proteins HMG1 and HMG2 with core histones in nucleosomes and core particles revealed by chemical cross-linking

Chemical cross-linking was used to study the interaction of the non-histone chromosomal proteins HMG1 and HMG2 with core histones in H1,H5-depleted nucleosomes or core particles. Cross-linking with a 'zero-length' cross-linker 1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)carbodiimide and with a longer (cleavable) cross-linker dimethyl-3,3'-dithiobispropionimidate revealed an interaction of HMG1 and HMG2 with (or proximity to) core histones in both types of particles. These results indicated that the presence of the 40-50-base-pairs-long segment of the 'linker' DNA in nucleosomes was not necessary for the establishment of mutual contacts of HMG1 and HMG2 proteins with core histones. Possible implications of the interaction of HMG1 and HMG2 proteins with histones for the structure and functioning of chromatin are discussed.     

Preferential in vitro binding of high mobility group proteins 14 and 17 to nucleosomes containing active and DNase I sensitive single-copy genes

High mobility group (HMG) proteins 14 and 17 bind to mononucleosomes in vitro, but the exact nature of this binding has not been clearly established. A new method was developed to allow direct membrane transfer of DNA from HMG 14/17 bound and unbound nucleosomes, which have been separated by acrylamide gel electrophoresis. Hybridization analysis of membranes obtained by this method revealed that the HMG 14/17 bound nucleosomes of avian erythrocytes and rat hepatic tumor (HTC) cells were enriched, about 2-fold, in actively transcribed genes and also inactive but DNase I sensitive genes. Nucleosomes containing inactive, DNase I resistant genes were bound by HMG 14/17, but not preferentially. Several factors that have been reported to greatly influence the binding of HMG 14/17 to nucleosomes in vitro were tested and shown to not account for the preferential binding to DNase I sensitive chromatin. These factors include nucleosomal linker DNA length, single-stranded DNA nicks, and DNA bulk hypomethylation. An additional factor, histone acetylation, was preferentially associated with the HMG 14/17 bound chromatin fraction of avian erythrocytes, but it was not associated with the HMG 14/17 bound chromatin fraction of metabolically active HTC cells. The latter finding was true for all kinetic forms of histone acetylation.     

DNase I digestion reveals alternating asymmetrical protection of the nucleosome by the higher order chromatin structure

DNase I was used to probe the higher order chromatin structure in whole nuclei. The digestion profiles obtained were the result of single-stranded cuts and were independent of pH, type of divalent ion and chromatin repeat length. Furthermore, the protection from digestion of the DNA at the entry/exit points on the nucleosome was found to be caused not by the H1/H5 histone tails, but by the compact structure that these proteins support. In order to resolve symmetry ambiguities, DNase I digestion fragments over several nucleosome repeat lengths were analysed quantitatively and compared with computer simulations using combinations of the experimentally obtained rate constants (some of which were converted to 0 to simulate steric protection from DNase I digestion). A clear picture of precisely defined, alternating, asymmetrically protected nucleosomes emerged. The linker DNA is inside the fibre, while the nucleosomes are positioned above and below a helical path and/or with alternating orientation towards the dyad axis. The dinucleosomal modulation of the digestion patterns comes from alternate protection of cutting sites inside the nucleosome and not from alternating exposure to the enzyme of the linker DNA.     

Binding of non-histone chromosomal protein HMG1 to histone H3 in nucleosomes detected by photochemical cross-linking

The interaction of non-histone chromosomal protein HMG1 with core histones in nucleosomes was studied via reconstitution and photochemical cross-linking. The results obtained indicated that photoaffinity-labeled HMG1 interacted in nucleosomes with histone H3. Similar experiments with peptides derived from HMG1 by V8 protease digestion allowed to identify N-terminal domain of HMG1 (peptide V3) as a binding region for histone H3 in nucleosomes.     

Interaction of HMG 14 and 17 with actively transcribed genes

The interaction of HMG 14 and 17 with actively transcribed genes was studied by monitoring the sensitivity of specific genes to DNAase I after reconstitution of HMG-depleted chromatin with HMG 14 and 17. Our experiments lead to the following conclusions: most actively transcribed genes become sensitized to DNAase I by HMG 14 and 17; either HMG 14 or HMG 17 can sensitize most genes to DNAase I; genes transcribed at different rates have about the same affinity for HMG 14 and 17; HMG 14 and 17 bind stoichiometrically to actively transcribed nucleosomes; and HMG 14 and 17 can restore DNAase I sensitivity to purified nucleosome core particles depleted of HMGs. This last observation suggests that during reconstitution, low levels of HMG 14 and 17 can associate with the active nucleosomes in the presence of a 10–20 fold excess of inactive nucleosomes. Consequently, we conclude that besides their association with HMGs, active nucleosomes also have at least one other unique feature that distinguishes them from bulk nucleosomes and insures proper HMG binding during reconstitution.     

Closely spaced nucleosome cores in reconstituted histone.DNA complexes and histone-H1-depleted chromatin

It has been demonstrated by digestion studies with micrococcal nuclease that reconstitution of complexes from DNA and a mixture of the four small calf thymus histones H2A, H2B, H3, and H4 leads to subunits closely spaced in a 137 +/- 7-nucleotide-pair register. Subunits isolated from the reconstituted complex contain nearly equimolar amounts of the four histones and sediment at 11.6S. On DNase I digestion both the reconstituted complex and the separated subunits gave rise to series of single-stranded DNA fragments with a 10-nucleotide periodicity. This indicates that the reconstitution leads to subunits very similar to nucleosome cores. Nucleosome cores closely spaced in a 140-nucleotide-pair register were also obtained upon removal of histone H1 from chromatin by dissociation with 0.63 M NaCl and subsequent ultracentrifugation. In reconstitution experiments with all five histones (including histone H1) our procedure did not lead to tandemly arranged nucleosomes containing about 200 nucleotide pairs of DNA. In the presence of EDTA, DNase II cleaved calf thymus nuclei and chromatin at about 200-nucleotide-pair intervals whereas in the presence of Mg2+ cleavage at intervals of approximately half this size was observed. The change in the nature of the cleavage pattern, however, was no longer found after removal of histone H1 from chromatin. This indicates that H1 influences the accessibility of DNase II cleavage sites in chromatin. This finding is discussed with respect to the influence of histone H1 on chromatin superstructure.     

Selective release of HMG nonhistone proteins during DNase digestion of Tetrahymena chromatin at different stages of the cell cycle.

The possible role of LG-1, a Tetrahymena specific HMG protein found in the macronuclear chromatin (Hamana, K. and Iwai, K. (1979) J. Biochem. 86, 789-794), was examined in relation to the chromatin structure. The chromatin isolated from cells synchronized at different stages of the cell cycle contained about one molecule of LG-1 per nucleosome. Limited digestion of the chromatin with DNase I or micrococcal nuclease selectively released LG-1 with the nucleosomal core histones and H1 remained insoluble, bound to the resistant DNA. Depending on the cell stages several types of chromatin structure were distinguished by their nuclease sensitivity. However, the chromatin at different stages exhibited the similar behavior of the LG-1 release with the nucleases as a function of the degree of chromatin solubilization. The results suggest that LG-1 proteins play a role in the chromatin organization which is rather independent of the cell stages.     

Identification of the core-histone-binding domains of HMG1 and HMG2

High mobility group (HMG) nonhistone chromosomal proteins are a group of abundant, conservative and highly charged nuclear proteins whose physiological role in chromatin is still unknown. To gain insight into the interactions of HMG1 and HMG2 with the fundamental components of chromatin we have introduced the methodology of photochemical crosslinking. This technique has allowed us to study the interaction of HMG1 and HMG2 with the core histones, in the form of an H2A X H2B dimer and an (H3 X H4)2 tetramer, for an effective time of crosslinking of less than 1 ms and under very mild conditions. This is achieved by using flash photolysis. With this procedure we found that both HMG1 and HMG2 interact with H2A X H2B and also with (H3 X H4)2. In the second case, they seem to do this through histone H3. To obtain more information about the interactions, we split HMG1 and HMG2 into their peptides using staphylococcal proteinase. The peptides obtained, which reflect the domain distribution of these proteins, were then used along with the histone oligomers to elucidate their interactions by means of photochemical crosslinking. Results obtained indicate that the domain of HMG1 and HMG2 involved in the interaction with H2A X H2B histones is the highly acidic C-terminal, whereas the N-terminal is involved in the interactions with (H3 X H4)2 histones. In all cases, the interactions found appear appreciably strong. Along with other data published in the literature, these proteins appear to have at least one binding site per domain for the chromatin components.     

HMG protein binding to an A/T-rich positive regulatory region of the pea plastocyanin gene promoter

Gel retardation assays using pea nuclear extracts have detected specific binding to regions of the promoter of the pea plastocyanin gene (petE). Several complexes which differ in sensitivity to competition with unlabelled promoter fragments and various DNA alternating copolymers, to heat treatment and to digestion with proteinase K have been detected. A protein factor, PCF1, forming one of these complexes was heat-stable and most sensitive to competition with poly(dAdT).poly(dAdT) compared to other alternating copolymers. DNase I footprinting assays showed that tracts of A/T-rich sequence within the -444 to -177 positive regulatory region of the petE promoter were protected in the presence of the pea nuclear extract. The factor PCF1 copurified with a high-mobility-group (HMG) protein preparation from pea chromatin. DNase I footprinting with the HMG protein preparation demonstrated that similar tracts of A/T-rich sequences within the promoter were protected. Southwestern-blot analysis of pea HMG proteins purified by gel filtration through Superose 12 detected a single DNA-binding species of 21 kDa. The properties of the factor PCF1 suggest that it is likely to be an HMG I protein.     

Non-random reconstitution of HMG1 and HMG2 in chromatin. Determination of the histone contacts

We have studied how non-histone proteins HMG1 and HMG2 interact with rat liver chromatin using reconstitution and chemical cross-linking procedures. Both proteins were found to associate to chromatin only to some extent and always with a marked preference for short oligonucleosomes, mainly mono- and dinucleosomes. However, a slight reconstitution with the long polynucleosomal fraction can be observed in H1-depleted chromatin. Reconstitution is non-random and a clear preference for regions highly sensitive to staphylococcal nuclease (EC 3.1.31.1) is observed. Chemical cross-linking has allowed us to identify H1, H2A and H2B as the histones contacted by HMG1 and HMG2 upon reconstitution. Also, we present evidence that HMG1 and HMG2 interact with the nucleosomal particle without replacing H1 or any other histone.