Oxo-phytodienoic acid (OPDA) is formed on fatty acids esterified to galactolipids after tissue disruption in Arabidopsis thaliana

Biotic and abiotic stress induces the formation of galactolipids esterified with the phytohormones 12-oxo-phytodienoic acid (OPDA) and dinor-oxo-phytodienoic acid (dnOPDA) in Arabidopsis thaliana. The biosynthetic pathways of free (dn)OPDA is well described, but it is unclear how they are incorporated into galactolipids. We herein show that (dn)OPDA containing lipids are formed rapidly after disruption of cellular integrity in leaf tissue. Five minutes after freeze-thawing, 60-70% of the trienoic acids esterified to chloroplast galactolipids are converted to (dn)OPDA. Stable isotope labeling with (18)O-water provides strong evidence for that the fatty acids remain attached to galactolipids during the enzymatic conversion to (dn)OPDA.     

Nitric oxide functions in both methyl jasmonate signaling and abscisic acid signaling in Arabidopsis guard cells

Intracellular components in methyl jasmonate (MeJA) signaling remain largely unknown, to compare those in well-understood abscisic acid (ABA) signaling. We have reported that nitric oxide (NO) is a signaling component in MeJA-induced stomatal closure, as well as ABA-induced stomatal closure in the previous study. To gain further information about the role of NO in the guard cell signaling, NO production was examined in an ABA- and MeJA-insensitive Arabidopsis mutant, rcn1. Neither MeJA nor ABA induced NO production in rcn1 guard cells. Our data suggest that NO functions downstream of the branch point of MeJA and ABA signaling in Arabidopsis guard cells.Key words: abscisic acid, Arabidopsis thaliana, guard cells, methyl jasmonate, nitric oxideStomatal pores that are formed by pairs of guard cells respond to various environmental stimuli including plant hormones. Some signal components commonly function in MeJA- and ABA-induced stomatal closing signals,¹ such as cytosolic alkalization, ROS generation and cytosolic free calcium ion elevation. Recently, we demonstrated that NO functions in MeJA signaling, as well as ABA signaling in guard cells.²NO production by nitric oxide synthase (NOS) and nitrate reductase (NR) plays important roles in physiological processes in plants.^3,4 It has been shown that NO functions downstream of ROS production in ABA signaling in guard cells.⁵ NO mediates elevation of cytosolic free Ca²⁺ concentration ([Ca²⁺]_cyt), inactivation of inward-rectifying K⁺ channels and activation of S-type anion channels,⁶ which are known to be key factors in MeJA- and ABA-induced stomatal closure.^2,7–9It has been reported that ROS was not induced by MeJA and ABA in the MeJA- and ABA-insensitive mutant, rcn1 in which the regulatory subunit A of protein phosphatase 2A, RCN1, is impaired.^7,10 We examined NO production induced by MeJA and ABA in rcn1 guard cells (Fig. 1). NO production by MeJA and ABA was impaired in rcn1 mutant (p = 0.87 and 0.25 for MeJA and ABA, respectively) in contrast to wild type. On the other hand, the NO donor, SNP induced stomatal closure both in wild type and rcn1 mutant (data not shown). These results are consistent with our previous results, i.e., NO is involved in both MeJA- and ABA-induced stomatal closure and functions downstream of the branching point of MeJA and ABA signaling in Arabidopsis guard cells.⁷ Our finding implies that protein phosphatase 2A might positively regulate NO levels in guard cells (Fig. 2).Open in a separate windowFigure 1Impairment of MeJA- and ABA-induced NO production in rcn1 guard cells. (A) Effects of MeJA (n = 10) and ABA (n = 9) on NO production in wild-type guard cells. (B) Effects of MeJA (n = 7) and ABA (n = 7) on NO production in rcn1 guard cells. The vertical scale represents the percentage of diaminofluorescein-2 diacetate (DAF-2 DA) fluorescent levels when fluorescent intensities of MeJA- or ABA-treated cells are normalized to control value taken as 100% for each experiment. Each datum was obtained from at least 30 guard cells. Error bars represent standard errors. Significance of differences between data sets was assessed by Student''s t-test analysis in this paper. We regarded differences at the level of p < 0.05 as significant.Open in a separate windowFigure 2A model of signal interaction in MeJA-induced and ABA-induced stomatal closure. Neither MeJA nor ABA induces ROS production, NO production, I_Kin and stomatal closure in rcn1 mutant. These results suggest that NO functions downstream of the branch point of MeJA signaling and ABA signaling in Arabidopsis guard cells.     

The involvement of intracellular glutathione in methyl jasmonate signaling in Arabidopsis guard cells

We examined the involvement of intracellular glutathione (GSH) in methyl jasmonate (MeJA) signaling. The chlorina1-1 (ch1-1) mutation decreased GSH in guard cells and narrowed the stomatal aperture. GSH monoethyl ester increased intracellular GSH, diminishing this phenotype. GSH did not affect MeJA-induced reactive oxygen species production or cytosolic Ca(2+) oscillation, suggesting that GSH modulates MeJA signaling downstream of production and oscillation.     

Fusarium oxysporum hijacks COI1-mediated jasmonate signaling to promote disease development in Arabidopsis

Although defense responses mediated by the plant oxylipin jasmonic acid (JA) are often necessary for resistance against pathogens with necrotrophic lifestyles, in this report we demonstrate that jasmonate signaling mediated through COI1 in Arabidopsis thaliana is responsible for susceptibility to wilt disease caused by the root-infecting fungal pathogen Fusarium oxysporum . Despite compromised JA-dependent defense responses, the JA perception mutant coronatine insensitive 1 ( coi1 ), but not JA biosynthesis mutants, exhibited a high level of resistance to wilt disease caused by F. oxysporum . This response was independent from salicylic acid-dependent defenses, as coi1/NahG plants showed similar disease resistance to coi1 plants. Inoculation of reciprocal grafts made between coi1 and wild-type plants revealed that coi1 -mediated resistance occurred primarily through the coi1 rootstock tissues. Furthermore, microscopy and quantification of fungal DNA during infection indicated that coi1 -mediated resistance was not associated with reduced fungal penetration and colonization until a late stage of infection, when leaf necrosis was highly developed in wild-type plants. In contrast to wild-type leaves, coi1 leaves showed no necrosis following the application of F. oxysporum culture filtrate, and showed reduced expression of senescence-associated genes during disease development, suggesting that coi1 resistance is most likely achieved through the inhibition of F. oxysporum -incited lesion development and plant senescence. Together, our results indicate that F. oxysporum hijacks non-defensive aspects of the JA-signaling pathway to cause wilt-disease symptoms that lead to plant death in Arabidopsis.     

Heterotrimeric G proteins facilitate Arabidopsis resistance to necrotrophic pathogens and are involved in jasmonate signaling

Heterotrimeric G proteins have been previously linked to plant defense; however a role for the Gbetagamma dimer in defense signaling has not been described to date. Using available Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) mutants lacking functional Galpha or Gbeta subunits, we show that defense against the necrotrophic pathogens Alternaria brassicicola and Fusarium oxysporum is impaired in Gbeta-deficient mutants while Galpha-deficient mutants show slightly increased resistance compared to wild-type Columbia ecotype plants. In contrast, responses to virulent (DC3000) and avirulent (JL1065) strains of Pseudomonas syringae appear to be independent of heterotrimeric G proteins. The induction of a number of defense-related genes in Gbeta-deficient mutants were severely reduced in response to A. brassicicola infection. In addition, Gbeta-deficient mutants exhibit decreased sensitivity to a number of methyl jasmonate-induced responses such as induction of the plant defensin gene PDF1.2, inhibition of root elongation, seed germination, and growth of plants in sublethal concentrations of methyl jasmonate. In all cases, the behavior of the Galpha-deficient mutants is coherent with the classic heterotrimeric mechanism of action, indicating that jasmonic acid signaling is influenced by the Gbetagamma functional subunit but not by Galpha. We hypothesize that Gbetagamma acts as a direct or indirect enhancer of the jasmonate signaling pathway in plants.     

The Arabidopsis mutant cev1 links cell wall signaling to jasmonate and ethylene responses

Biotic and abiotic stresses stimulate the synthesis of jasmonates and ethylene, which, in turn, induce the expression of genes involved in stress response and enhance defense responses. The cev1 mutant has constitutive expression of stress response genes and has enhanced resistance to fungal pathogens. Here, we show that cev1 plants have increased production of jasmonate and ethylene and that its phenotype is suppressed by mutations that interrupt jasmonate and ethylene signaling. Genetic mapping, complementation analysis, and sequence analysis revealed that CEV1 is the cellulose synthase CeSA3. CEV1 was expressed predominantly in root tissues, and cev1 roots contained less cellulose than wild-type roots. Significantly, the cev1 mutant phenotype could be reproduced by treating wild-type plants with cellulose biosynthesis inhibitors, and the cellulose synthase mutant rsw1 also had constitutive expression of VSP. We propose that the cell wall can signal stress responses in plants.     

Towards a reporter system to identify regulators of cross-talk between salicylate and jasmonate signaling pathways in Arabidopsis

The plant signaling hormones salicylic acid (SA) and jasmonic acid (JA) are regulators of inducible defenses that are activated upon pathogen or insect attack. Cross-talk between SA- and JA-dependent signaling pathways allows a plant to finely tune its response to the attacker encountered. In Arabidopsis, pharmacological experiments revealed that SA exerts a strong antagonistic effect on JA-responsive genes, such as PDF1.2, indicating that the SA pathway can be prioritized over the JA pathway. SA-mediated suppression of the JA-responsive PDF1.2 promoter was exploited for setting up a genetic screen aiming at the isolation of signal transduction mutants that are impaired in this cross-talk mechanism. The PDF1.2 promoter was fused to the herbicide resistance gene BAR to allow for life/death screening of a population of mutagenized transgenic plants. Non-mutant plants should survive herbicide treatment when methyl jasmonate (MeJA) is applied, but suppression of the JA response by SA should be lethal in combination with the herbicide. Conversely, crucial SA/JA cross-talk mutants should survive the combination treatment. SA effectively suppressed the expression of the PDF1.2::BAR transgene. However, suppression of the BAR gene did not result in suppression of herbicide resistance. Hence, a screening method based on quantitative differences in the expression of a reporter gene may be better suited to identify SA/JA cross-talk mutants. Here, we demonstrate that the PDF1.2::GUS reporter will be excellently suited in this respect.Key words: plant defense, salicylic acid, jasmonic acid, cross-talk, mutant screen, Arabidopsis     

Transient pulse formation in jasmonate signaling pathway

The jasmonate (JA) signaling pathway in plants is activated as defense response to a number of stresses like attacks by pests or pathogens and wounding by animals. Some recent experiments provide significant new knowledge on the molecular detail and connectivity of the pathway. The pathway has two major components in the form of feedback loops, one negative and the other positive. We construct a minimal mathematical model, incorporating the feedback loops, to study the dynamics of the JA signaling pathway. The model exhibits transient gene expression activity in the form of JA pulses in agreement with experimental observations. The dependence of the pulse amplitude, duration and peak time on the key parameters of the model is determined computationally. The deterministic and stochastic aspects of the pathway dynamics are investigated using both the full mathematical model and a reduced version of it. We also compare the mechanism of pulse formation with the known mechanisms of pulse generation in some bacterial and viral systems.     

Bestatin, an inhibitor of aminopeptidases, provides a chemical genetics approach to dissect jasmonate signaling in Arabidopsis

Bestatin, a potent inhibitor of some aminopeptidases, was shown previously to be a powerful inducer of wound-response genes in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum). Here, we present several lines of evidence showing that bestatin specifically activates jasmonic acid (JA) signaling in plants. First, bestatin specifically activates the expression of JA-inducible genes in tomato and Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana). Second, the induction of JA-responsive genes by bestatin requires the COI1-dependent JA-signaling pathway, but does not depend strictly on JA biosynthesis. Third, microarray analysis using Arabidopsis whole-genome chip demonstrates that the gene expression profile of bestatin-treated plants is similar to that of JA-treated plants. Fourth, bestatin promotes a series of JA-related developmental phenotypes. Taken together, the unique action mode of bestatin in regulating JA-signaled processes leads us to the hypothesis that bestatin exerts its effects through the modulation of some key regulators in JA signaling. We have employed bestatin as an experimental tool to dissect JA signaling through a chemical genetic screening, which yielded a collection of Arabidopsis bestatin-resistant (ber) mutants that are insensitive to the inhibitory effects of bestatin on root elongation. Further characterization efforts demonstrate that some ber mutants are defective in various JA-induced responses, which allowed us to classify the ber mutants into three phenotypic groups: JA-insensitive ber mutants, JA-hypersensitive ber mutants, and mutants insensitive to bestatin but showing normal response to JA. Genetic and phenotypic analyses of the ber mutants with altered JA responses indicate that we have identified several novel loci involved in JA signaling.     

Top hits in contemporary JAZ: An update on jasmonate signaling

The phytohormone jasmonate (JA) regulates a wide range of growth, developmental, and defense-related processes during the plant life cycle. Identification of the JAZ family of proteins that repress JA responses has facilitated rapid progress in understanding how this lipid-derived hormone controls gene expression. Recent analysis of JAZ proteins has provided insight into the nature of the JA receptor, the chemical specificity of signal perception, and cross-talk between JA and other hormone response pathways. Functional diversification of JAZ proteins by alternative splicing, together with the ability of JAZ proteins to homo- and heterodimerize, provide mechanisms to enhance combinatorial diversity and versatility in gene regulation by JA.     

Methyl jasmonate signaling and signal crosstalk between methyl jasmonate and abscisic acid in guard cells

Plants tightly control stomatal aperture in response to various environmental changes. A drought-inducible phytohormone, abscisic acid (ABA), triggers stomatal closure and ABA signaling pathway in guard cells has been well studied. Similar to ABA, methyl jasmonate (MeJA) induces stomatal closure in various plant species but MeJA signaling pathway is still far from clear. Recently we found that Arabidopsis calcium dependent protein kinase CPK6 functions as a positive regulator in guard cell MeJA signaling and provided new insights into cytosolic Ca²⁺-dependent MeJA signaling. Here we discuss the MeJA signaling and also signal crosstalk between MeJA and ABA pathways in guard cells.Key words: methyl jasmonate, abscisic acid, guard cell, reactive oxygen species, nitric oxide, calciumStomata, which are formed by pairs of specialized cells called guard cells, control gas exchanges and transpirational water loss. Guard cells can shrink and swell in response to various physiological stimuli, resulting in stomatal closing and opening.^1,2 To optimize growth under various environmental conditions, plants have developed fine-tuned signal pathway in guard cells. Abscisic acid (ABA) is synthesized under drought stress and induces stomatal closure to reduce transpirational water loss.² ABA signal transduction in guard cells has been widely studied. ABA induces increases of various second messengers such as cytosolic Ca²⁺, reactive oxygen species (ROS) and nitric oxide (NO) in guard cells. These early signal components finally evoke ion efflux through plasma membrane ion channels, resulting in reduction of guard cell turgor pressure.Jasmonates are plant hormones synthesized via the octadecanoid pathway and regulate various physiological processes in plants such as pollen maturation, tendril coiling, senescence and responses to wounding and pathogen attacks.³ Similar to ABA, jasmonates also trigger stomatal closure and the response is conserved among various plant species including Arabidopsis thaliana,⁴ Hordeum vulgare,⁵ Commelina benghalensis,⁶ Vicia faba,⁷ Nicotiana glauca,⁸ Paphiopedilum Supersuk⁹ and Paphiopedilum tonsum.⁹ A volatile methyl ester of jasmonic acid (JA), methy jasmonate (MeJA), has been widely used for studying jasmonate signaling pathway. To date, pharmacological and reverse genetic approaches have revealed many important signal components involved in MeJA-induced stomatal closure and suggest a signal crosstalk between MeJA and ABA in guard cells. In this review, we mainly focus on the three important second messengers, ROS, NO and cytosolic Ca²⁺ and discuss recent advance about MeJA signaling and signal interaction between MeJA and ABA in guard cells.     

Brassinosteroid negatively regulates jasmonate inhibition of root growth in Arabidopsis

Jasmonate (JA) inhibits root growth of Arabidopsis thaliana seedlings. The mutation in COI1, that plays a central role in JA signaling, displays insensitivity to JA inhibition of root growth. To dissect JA signaling pathway, we recently isolated one mutant named psc1, which partially suppresses coi1 insensitivity to JA inhibition of root growth. As we identified the PSC1 gene as an allele of DWF4 that encodes a key enzyme in brassinosteroid (BR) biosynthesis, we hypothesized and demonstrated that BR is involved in JA signaling and negatively regulates JA inhibition of root growth. In our Plant Physiology paper, we analyzed effects of psc1 or exogenous BR on the inhibition of root growth by JA. Here we show that treatment with brassinazole (Brz), a BR biosynthesis inhibitor, increased JA sensitivity in both coi1-2 and wild type, which further confirms that BR negatively regulates JA inhibition of root growth. Since effects of psc1, Brz and exogenous BR on JA inhibition of root growth were mild, we suggests that BR negatively finely regulates JA inhibition of root growth in Arabidopsis.Key words: jasmonate signaling, root growth, brassinosteroid, brassinazole, arabidopsisJasmonate (JA) regulates many plant developmental processes and stress responses.^1,2 COI1 plays a central role in JA signaling and is required for all JA responses in Arabidopsis.^3,4 coi1-1, a strong mutation in COI1, is male sterile and exhibits loss of all JA responses tested to date, such as JA inhibition of root growth, the expression of JA-induced genes, and susceptibility to insect attack and pathogen infection, and coi1-2, a weak mutant of COI1, shows similar JA responses to coi1-1 except for partially fertile that makes it able to produce a small quantity of seeds.⁵To investigate COI1-mediated JA responses and dissect JA signaling pathway, we conducted genetic screens for suppressors of coi1-2. Previously, we identified cos1 that completely suppresses coil-2 insensitive to JA.⁶ Recently, we isolated the psc1 mutant that partially suppresses coi1-2 insensitivity to JA, and found that PSC1 is an allele of DWF4.⁷Since the DWF4 gene encodes a key enzyme in brassinosteroid (BR) biosynthesis,⁸ we hypothesized that BR is involved in JA signaling. By physiological analysis, we showed that psc1 partially restored JA inhibition of root growth in coi1-2 background and displayed JA hypersensitivity in wild-type COI1 background, the effects of psc1 were eliminated by exogenous BR, and that exogenous BR could attenuated JA inhibition of root growth in wild type. These findings demonstrated that BR is involved in JA signaling and indicated that BR negatively regulates JA inhibition of root growth.BR is a family of polyhydroxylated steroid hormones involved in many aspects of plant growth and development. The BR-deficient mutants exhibited severely retarded growth that was able to be rescued by exogenous BR.⁹ Brassinazole (Brz) is a BR biosynthesis inhibitor. The Arabidopsis seedlings treated with Brz displayed a BR deficient-mutant-like phenotype, which could be elimilated by exogenous BR.¹⁰To determine wether treatment with Brz affects JA inhibition of root growth, the seedlings of wild type and coi1-2 were grown in MS medium supplemented with MeJA and/or Brz. As shown in Figure 1, the relative root length was obviously reduced in both coi1-2 and wild type when treated with Brz relative to without Brz, indicating that the repression of BR biosynthesis by Brz could increase JA sensitivity. These results further confirm BR negatively regulates JA inhibition of root growth.Open in a separate windowFigure 1Effect of Brz on JA inhibition of root growth. Brz increased JA inhibition of root growth in both coi1-2 and wild type (WT). Root length of 7-day-old seedlings grown in MS medium containing 0, 5 and 10 μM MeJA without (−) or with (+) 0.5 μM Brz was expressed as a percentage of root length in MS without (−) or with (+) 0.5 µM Brz. Error bars represent SE (n > 30).It has been demonstrated that JA connects with other plant hormones including auxin, ethylene, abscisic acid, salicylic acid and gibberellin to form complex regulatory networks modulating plant developmental and stress responses.^11–15 We found that BR negatively regulates JA inhibition of root growth, suggesting that a cross talk between JA and BR exists in planta, which extends our understandings on the JA signal transduction.COI1 is a JA receptor¹⁶ and DWF4 catalyzes the rate-limiting step in BR-biosynthesis pathway.⁸ We found that JA inhibits DWF4 expression, this inhibition was dependent on COI1,⁷ indicating that DWF4 is downregulated by JA and is located downstream of COI1 in the JA signaling pathway.Since the effects of psc1, Brz, and exogenous BR on JA inhibition of root growth were mild, and the DWF4 expression was partially repressed by JA (Ren et al. 2009, Fig. 1), we suggest that BR negatively finely regulates JA inhibition of root growth, and propose a model for these regulations. As shown in Figure 2A, JA signal passes COI1 repressing substrates, such as JAZs,^17,18 i.e., JA activates degradation of substrates via SCF^COI1-26S proteasome,^16–18 whereas substrates positively regulate root growth through other regulators. JA also partially inhibits DWF4 expression through COI1, reducing BR that is required for root growth.^7,9 Mutation in COI1 interrupts JA signaling for failing in degradation of substrates and repression of DWF4 as well, resulting in JA-insensitivity (Fig. 2B). However, mutation in DWF4 or treatment with Brz causes a reduction in BR, which affects root growth, leading to JA-hypersensitivity in wild-type COI1 background (Fig. 2C and E) and partial restoration of JA sensitivity in coi1-2 background (Fig. 2D and F). Whereas, an application of exogenous BR could eliminate the effect of BR reduction resulted from repression of DWF4 by JA on root growth, attenuating JA sensitivity in wild type (Fig. 2G). Because the inhibition of DWF4 expression by JA is dependent on COI1, the coi1 mutant treated with exogenous BR do not show alteration in JA sensitivity (Fig. 2H).Open in a separate windowFigure 2A model for that BR negatively finely regulates JA inhibition of root growth in Arabidopsis. (A–D) Treatment with JA in wild type (A), coi1-2 (B), psc1 (C) and psc1coi1 (D). (E and F) Treatments with JA and Brz in wild type (E) and coi1-2 (F). (G and H) Treatments with JA and exogenous BR in wild type (G) and coi1-2 (H). Arrows indicate positive regulation or enhancement, whereas blunted lines indicate repression or negative regulation. Crosses indicate interruption or impairment. The letter “S” indicates substrates of SCF^COI1. Thicker arrows and blunted lines represent the central JA signaling pathway regulating JA inhibition of root growth. Broken arrows represent JA signaling pathway in which other regulators are involved. The intensity of gray boxes represents the degree of JA inhibition on root growth.     

G-protein-coupled signaling in Arabidopsis

With an essentially complete plant genome in hand, it is now possible to conclude that a single or possibly just two canonical heterotrimeric G-protein complexes are present in Arabidopsis. In stark contrast, more than one hundred such complexes are found in some metazoans. Nonetheless, it appears that heterotrimeric G-protein complexes couple or affect many different signaling pathways in plants. In addition, there are very few, if any, candidate G-protein-coupled receptors through which this single complex can couple to downstream effectors. Furthermore, some of the classical downstream effectors that are activated by heterotrimeric G proteins in metazoans are also lacking in plants. Thus, we are left with the urgent challenge to determine the novel mechanism of G-protein signaling in plant cells. Recent advances using reverse and molecular genetic approaches have re-opened this topic for plant biologists and the resulting tools will accelerate our progress.     

Catalases negatively regulate methyl jasmonate signaling in guard cells

Methyl jasmonate (MeJA)-induced stomatal closure is accompanied by the accumulation of hydrogen peroxide (H?O?) in guard cells. In this study, we investigated the roles of catalases (CATs) in MeJA-induced stomatal closure using cat mutants cat2, cat3-1 and cat1 cat3, and the CAT inhibitor, 3-aminotriazole (AT). When assessed with 2',7'-dichlorodihydrofluorescein, the reduction of catalase activity by means of mutations and the inhibitor accumulated higher basal levels of H?O? in guard cells whereas they did not affect stomatal aperture in the absence of MeJA. In contrast, the cat mutations and the treatment with AT potentiated MeJA-induced stomatal closure and MeJA-induced H?O? production. These results indicate that CATs negatively regulate H?O? accumulation in guard cells and suggest that inducible H?O? production rather than constitutive elevation modulates stomatal apertures in Arabidopsis.