Semiparametric regression analysis of interval-censored data

We propose a semiparametric approach to the proportional hazards regression analysis of interval-censored data. An EM algorithm based on an approximate likelihood leads to an M-step that involves maximizing a standard Cox partial likelihood to estimate regression coefficients and then using the Breslow estimator for the unknown baseline hazards. The E-step takes a particularly simple form because all incomplete data appear as linear terms in the complete-data log likelihood. The algorithm of Turnbull (1976, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 38, 290-295) is used to determine times at which the hazard can take positive mass. We found multiple imputation to yield an easily computed variance estimate that appears to be more reliable than asymptotic methods with small to moderately sized data sets. In the right-censored survival setting, the approach reduces to the standard Cox proportional hazards analysis, while the algorithm reduces to the one suggested by Clayton and Cuzick (1985, Applied Statistics 34, 148-156). The method is illustrated on data from the breast cancer cosmetics trial, previously analyzed by Finkelstein (1986, Biometrics 42, 845-854) and several subsequent authors.     

A modification of Peto's nonparametric estimation of survival curves for interval-censored data

Peto (1973, Applied Statistics, 22, 86-91) gave a nonparametric generalized maximum-likelihood estimate of the survival function for interval-censored data. His method has a tendency to concentrate probability masses at the endpoints of the intervals, even for the ordinary grouped data, instead of spreading them through the intervals, as one might expect them to be in the underlying distribution. We describe a modification that overcomes this. The new estimate reduces to the standard binomial estimate when applied to grouped data. It also reduces to the Kaplan-Meier estimate when applied to survival data that consist of only exact or right-censored observations. Both estimates are maximum-likelihood estimates but are based on different interpretations of the endpoints of the intervals.     

Dimension reduction in survival regressions with censored data via an imputed spline approach

Dimension reduction methods have been proposed for regression analysis with predictors of high dimension, but have not received much attention on the problems with censored data. In this article, we present an iterative imputed spline approach based on principal Hessian directions (PHD) for censored survival data in order to reduce the dimension of predictors without requiring a prespecified parametric model. Our proposal is to replace the right-censored survival time with its conditional expectation for adjusting the censoring effect by using the Kaplan-Meier estimator and an adaptive polynomial spline regression in the residual imputation. A sparse estimation strategy is incorporated in our approach to enhance the interpretation of variable selection. This approach can be implemented in not only PHD, but also other methods developed for estimating the central mean subspace. Simulation studies with right-censored data are conducted for the imputed spline approach to PHD (IS-PHD) in comparison with two methods of sliced inverse regression, minimum average variance estimation, and naive PHD in ignorance of censoring. The results demonstrate that the proposed IS-PHD method is particularly useful for survival time responses approximating symmetric or bending structures. Illustrative applications to two real data sets are also presented.     

Mean residual life cure models for right-censored data with and without length-biased sampling

We propose a semiparametric mean residual life mixture cure model for right-censored survival data with a cured fraction. The model employs the proportional mean residual life model to describe the effects of covariates on the mean residual time of uncured subjects and the logistic regression model to describe the effects of covariates on the cure rate. We develop estimating equations to estimate the proposed cure model for the right-censored data with and without length-biased sampling, the latter is often found in prevalent cohort studies. In particular, we propose two estimating equations to estimate the effects of covariates in the cure rate and a method to combine them to improve the estimation efficiency. The consistency and asymptotic normality of the proposed estimates are established. The finite sample performance of the estimates is confirmed with simulations. The proposed estimation methods are applied to a clinical trial study on melanoma and a prevalent cohort study on early-onset type 2 diabetes mellitus.     

Analysis of Dichotomized Factorial Data Using Cox's Proportional Hazards Model and Related Tests

This paper describes how Cox's Proportional Hazards model may be used to analyze dichotomized factorial data obtained from a right-censored epidemiological study where time to response is of interest. Exact maximum likelihood estimates of the relative mortality rates are derived for any number of prognostic factors, but for the sake of simplicity, the mathematical details are presented for the case of two factors. This method is not based on the life table procedure. Kaplan-Meier estimates are obtained for the survival function of the internal control population, Which are in turn used to determine the expected number of deaths in the study population. The asymptotic (large sample) joint sampling distribution of the relative mortality rates is derived and some relevant simultaneous and conditional statistical tests are discussed. The relative mortality rates of several prognostic factors may be jointly considered as the multivariate extension of the familiar standard mortality ratio (SMR) of epidemiological studies. A numerical example is discussed to illustrate the method.     

Sieve Estimation for the Cox Model with Clustered Interval-Censored Failure Time Data

Clustered interval-censored failure time data occur when the failure times of interest are clustered into small groups and known only to lie in certain intervals. A number of methods have been proposed for regression analysis of clustered failure time data, but most of them apply only to clustered right-censored data. In this paper, a sieve estimation procedure is proposed for fitting a Cox frailty model to clustered interval-censored failure time data. In particular, a two-step algorithm for parameter estimation is developed and the asymptotic properties of the resulting sieve maximum likelihood estimators are established. The finite sample properties of the proposed estimators are investigated through a simulation study and the method is illustrated by the data arising from a lymphatic filariasis study.     

A semiparametric estimate of treatment effects with censored data

A semiparametric estimate of an average regression effect with right-censored failure time data has recently been proposed under the Cox-type model where the regression effect beta(t) is allowed to vary with time. In this article, we derive a simple algebraic relationship between this average regression effect and a measurement of group differences in k-sample transformation models when the random error belongs to the G(rho) family of Harrington and Fleming (1982, Biometrika 69, 553-566), the latter being equivalent to the conditional regression effect in a gamma frailty model. The models considered here are suitable for the attenuating hazard ratios that often arise in practice. The results reveal an interesting connection among the above three classes of models as alternatives to the proportional hazards assumption and add to our understanding of the behavior of the partial likelihood estimate under nonproportional hazards. The algebraic relationship provides a simple estimator under the transformation model. We develop a variance estimator based on the empirical influence function that is much easier to compute than the previously suggested resampling methods. When there is truncation in the right tail of the failure times, we propose a method of bias correction to improve the coverage properties of the confidence intervals. The estimate, its estimated variance, and the bias correction term can all be calculated with minor modifications to standard software for proportional hazards regression.     

On the estimation of average treatment effects with right-censored time to event outcome and competing risks

We are interested in the estimation of average treatment effects based on right-censored data of an observational study. We focus on causal inference of differences between t-year absolute event risks in a situation with competing risks. We derive doubly robust estimation equations and implement estimators for the nuisance parameters based on working regression models for the outcome, censoring, and treatment distribution conditional on auxiliary baseline covariates. We use the functional delta method to show that these estimators are regular asymptotically linear estimators and estimate their variances based on estimates of their influence functions. In empirical studies, we assess the robustness of the estimators and the coverage of confidence intervals. The methods are further illustrated using data from a Danish registry study.     

Analysis of Longitudinal Clinical Trials with Missing Data Using Multiple Imputation in Conjunction with Robust Regression

Summary In a typical randomized clinical trial, a continuous variable of interest (e.g., bone density) is measured at baseline and fixed postbaseline time points. The resulting longitudinal data, often incomplete due to dropouts and other reasons, are commonly analyzed using parametric likelihood‐based methods that assume multivariate normality of the response vector. If the normality assumption is deemed untenable, then semiparametric methods such as (weighted) generalized estimating equations are considered. We propose an alternate approach in which the missing data problem is tackled using multiple imputation, and each imputed dataset is analyzed using robust regression (M‐estimation; Huber, 1973 , Annals of Statistics 1, 799–821.) to protect against potential non‐normality/outliers in the original or imputed dataset. The robust analysis results from each imputed dataset are combined for overall estimation and inference using either the simple Rubin (1987 , Multiple Imputation for Nonresponse in Surveys, New York: Wiley) method, or the more complex but potentially more accurate Robins and Wang (2000 , Biometrika 87, 113–124.) method. We use simulations to show that our proposed approach performs at least as well as the standard methods under normality, but is notably better under both elliptically symmetric and asymmetric non‐normal distributions. A clinical trial example is used for illustration.     

Estimation in the cox proportional hazards model with left-truncated and interval-censored data

We show that the nonparametric maximum likelihood estimate (NPMLE) of the regression coefficient from the joint likelihood (of the regression coefficient and the baseline survival) works well for the Cox proportional hazards model with left-truncated and interval-censored data, but the NPMLE may underestimate the baseline survival. Two alternatives are also considered: first, the marginal likelihood approach by extending Satten (1996, Biometrika 83, 355-370) to truncated data, where the baseline distribution is eliminated as a nuisance parameter; and second, the monotone maximum likelihood estimate that maximizes the joint likelihood by assuming that the baseline distribution has a nondecreasing hazard function, which was originally proposed to overcome the underestimation of the survival from the NPMLE for left-truncated data without covariates (Tsai, 1988, Biometrika 75, 319-324). The bootstrap is proposed to draw inference. Simulations were conducted to assess their performance. The methods are applied to the Massachusetts Health Care Panel Study data set to compare the probabilities of losing functional independence for male and female seniors.     

Iterative partial least squares with right-censored data analysis: a comparison to other dimension reduction techniques

In the linear model with right-censored responses and many potential explanatory variables, regression parameter estimates may be unstable or, when the covariates outnumber the uncensored observations, not estimable. We propose an iterative algorithm for partial least squares, based on the Buckley-James estimating equation, to estimate the covariate effect and predict the response for a future subject with a given set of covariates. We use a leave-two-out cross-validation method for empirically selecting the number of components in the partial least-squares fit that approximately minimizes the error in estimating the covariate effect of a future observation. Simulation studies compare the methods discussed here with other dimension reduction techniques. Data from the AIDS Clinical Trials Group protocol 333 are used to motivate the methodology.     

Assessment of evaluation criteria for survival prediction from genomic data

Survival prediction from high-dimensional genomic data is dependent on a proper regularization method. With an increasing number of such methods proposed in the literature, comparative studies are called for and some have been performed. However, there is currently no consensus on which prediction assessment criterion should be used for time-to-event data. Without a firm knowledge about whether the choice of evaluation criterion may affect the conclusions made as to which regularization method performs best, these comparative studies may be of limited value. In this paper, four evaluation criteria are investigated: the log-rank test for two groups, the area under the time-dependent ROC curve (AUC), an R2-measure based on the Cox partial likelihood, and an R2-measure based on the Brier score. The criteria are compared according to how they rank six widely used regularization methods that are based on the Cox regression model, namely univariate selection, principal components regression (PCR), supervised PCR, partial least squares regression, ridge regression, and the lasso. Based on our application to three microarray gene expression data sets, we find that the results obtained from the widely used log-rank test deviate from the other three criteria studied. For future studies, where one also might want to include non-likelihood or non-model-based regularization methods, we argue in favor of AUC and the R2-measure based on the Brier score, as these do not suffer from the arbitrary splitting into two groups nor depend on the Cox partial likelihood.     

Bias-reduced estimators of conditional odds ratios in matched case-control studies with unmatched confounding

We study bias-reduced estimators of exponentially transformed parameters in general linear models (GLMs) and show how they can be used to obtain bias-reduced conditional (or unconditional) odds ratios in matched case-control studies. Two options are considered and compared: the explicit approach and the implicit approach. The implicit approach is based on the modified score function where bias-reduced estimates are obtained by using iterative procedures to solve the modified score equations. The explicit approach is shown to be a one-step approximation of this iterative procedure. To apply these approaches for the conditional analysis of matched case-control studies, with potentially unmatched confounding and with several exposures, we utilize the relation between the conditional likelihood and the likelihood of the unconditional logit binomial GLM for matched pairs and Cox partial likelihood for matched sets with appropriately setup data. The properties of the estimators are evaluated by using a large Monte Carlo simulation study and an illustration of a real dataset is shown. Researchers reporting the results on the exponentiated scale should use bias-reduced estimators since otherwise the effects can be under or overestimated, where the magnitude of the bias is especially large in studies with smaller sample sizes.     

Testing the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium in the HLA system

A new method of testing the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium in the human leukocyte antigen (HLA) system is proposed and applied to real data. The derivation is based on the maximum likelihood method and closely related to standard regression theory. The test statistic has a closed representation of residual sum of squares by a projection mapping of data onto the estimated regression plane. Under the Hardy-Weinberg law the noniterative estimates for the gene frequencies are suggested by the use of the projection mapping. The test statistic and gene frequency estimates are shown to be asymptotically equivalent to the maximum likelihood method and to be more efficient than the other suggested test statistic when there are more than two identified alleles.     

Survival estimation using splines

A nonparametric maximum likelihood procedure is given for estimating the survivor function from right-censored data. It approximates the hazard rate by a simple function such as a spline, with different approximations yielding different estimators. A special case is that proposed by Nelson (1969, Journal of Quality Technology 1, 27-52) and Altshuler (1970, Mathematical Biosciences 6, 1-11). The estimators are uniformly consistent and have the same asymptotic weak convergence properties as the Kaplan-Meier (1958, Journal of the American Statistical Association 53, 457-481) estimator. However, in small and in heavily censored samples, the simplest spline estimators have uniformly smaller mean squared error than do the Kaplan-Meier and Nelson-Altshuler estimators. The procedure is extended to estimate the baseline hazard rate and regression coefficients in the Cox (1972, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 34, 187-220) proportional hazards model and is illustrated using experimental carcinogenesis data.     

Distribution-free regression analysis of grouped survival data

Methods based on regression models for logarithmic hazard functions, Cox models, are given for analysis of grouped and censored survival data. By making an approximation it is possible to obtain explicitly a maximum likelihood function involving only the regression parameters. This likelihood function is a convenient analog to Cox's partial likelihood for ungrouped data. The method is applied to data from a toxicological experiment.     

Maximum likelihood estimation for interval-censored data using a Weibull-based accelerated failure time model.

The accelerated failure time regression model is most commonly used with right-censored survival data. This report studies the use of a Weibull-based accelerated failure time regression model when left- and interval-censored data are also observed. Two alternative methods of analysis are considered. First, the maximum likelihood estimates (MLEs) for the observed censoring pattern are computed. These are compared with estimates where midpoints are substituted for left- and interval-censored data (midpoint estimator, or MDE). Simulation studies indicate that for relatively large samples there are many instances when the MLE is superior to the MDE. For samples where the hazard rate is flat or nearly so, or where the percentage of interval-censored data is small, the MDE is adequate. An example using Framingham Heart Study data is discussed.     

Estimation of Additive Genetic Variance Components in Aquaculture Populations Selectively Pedigreed by DNA Fingerprinting

A method to estimate genetic variance components in populations partially pedigreed by DNA fingerprinting is presented. The focus is on aquaculture, where breeding procedures may produce thousands of individuals. In aquaculture populations the individuals available for measurement will often be selected, i.e. will come from the upper tail of a size‐at‐age distribution, or the lower tail of an age‐at‐maturity distribution etc. Selection typically occurs by size grading during grow‐out and/or choice of superior fish as broodstock. The method presented in this paper enables us to estimate genetic variance components when only a small proportion of individuals, those with extreme phenotypes, have been identified by DNA fingerprinting. We replace the usual normal density by appropriate robust least favourable densities to ensure the robustness of our estimates. Standard analysis of variance or maximum likelihood estimation cannot be used when only the extreme progeny have been pedigreed because of the biased nature of the estimates. In our model‐based procedure a full robust likelihood function is defined, in which the missing information about non‐extreme progeny has been taken into account. This robust likelihood function is transformed into a computable function which is maximized to get the estimates. The estimates of sire and dam additive variance components are significantly and uniformly more accurate than those obtained by any of the standard methods when tested on simulated population data and have desirable robustness properties.     

A Positive Stable Frailty Model for Clustered Failure Time Data with Covariate‐Dependent Frailty

Summary In this article, we propose a positive stable shared frailty Cox model for clustered failure time data where the frailty distribution varies with cluster‐level covariates. The proposed model accounts for covariate‐dependent intracluster correlation and permits both conditional and marginal inferences. We obtain marginal inference directly from a marginal model, then use a stratified Cox‐type pseudo‐partial likelihood approach to estimate the regression coefficient for the frailty parameter. The proposed estimators are consistent and asymptotically normal and a consistent estimator of the covariance matrix is provided. Simulation studies show that the proposed estimation procedure is appropriate for practical use with a realistic number of clusters. Finally, we present an application of the proposed method to kidney transplantation data from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients.     

A flexible hierarchical framework for improving inference in area-referenced environmental health studies

Study designs where data have been aggregated by geographical areas are popular in environmental epidemiology. These studies are commonly based on administrative databases and, providing a complete spatial coverage, are particularly appealing to make inference on the entire population. However, the resulting estimates are often biased and difficult to interpret due to unmeasured confounders, which typically are not available from routinely collected data. We propose a framework to improve inference drawn from such studies exploiting information derived from individual-level survey data. The latter are summarized in an area-level scalar score by mimicking at ecological level the well-known propensity score methodology. The literature on propensity score for confounding adjustment is mainly based on individual-level studies and assumes a binary exposure variable. Here, we generalize its use to cope with area-referenced studies characterized by a continuous exposure. Our approach is based upon Bayesian hierarchical structures specified into a two-stage design: (i) geolocated individual-level data from survey samples are up-scaled at ecological level, then the latter are used to estimate a generalized ecological propensity score (EPS) in the in-sample areas; (ii) the generalized EPS is imputed in the out-of-sample areas under different assumptions about the missingness mechanisms, then it is included into the ecological regression, linking the exposure of interest to the health outcome. This delivers area-level risk estimates, which allow a fuller adjustment for confounding than traditional areal studies. The methodology is illustrated by using simulations and a case study investigating the risk of lung cancer mortality associated with nitrogen dioxide in England (UK).