Definitive relationships among chemical structure, carcinogenicity and mutagenicity for 301 chemicals tested by the U.S. NTP.

An analysis is presented in which are evaluated correlations among chemical structure, mutagenicity to Salmonella, and carcinogenicity to rats and mice among 301 chemicals tested by the U.S. NTP. Overall, there was a high correlation between structural alerts to DNA reactivity and mutagenicity, but the correlation of either property with carcinogenicity was low. If rodent carcinogenicity is regarded as a singular property of chemicals, then neither structural alerts nor mutagenicity to Salmonella are effective in its prediction. Given this, the database was fragmented and new correlations sought between the derived sub-groups. First, the 301 chemicals were segregated into six broad chemical groupings. Second, the rodent cancer data were partially segregated by target tissue. Using the previously assigned structural alerts to DNA reactivity (electrophilicity), the chemicals were split into 154 alerting chemicals and 147 non-alerting chemicals. The alerting chemicals were split into three chemical groups; aromatic amino/nitro-types, alkylating agents and miscellaneous structurally-alerting groups. The non-alerting chemicals were subjectively split into three broad categories; non-alerting, non-alerting containing a non-reactive halogen group, and non-alerting chemical with minor concerns about a possible structural alert. The tumor data for all 301 chemicals are re-presented according to these six chemical groupings. The most significant findings to emerge from comparisons among these six groups of chemicals were as follows: (a) Most of the rodent carcinogens, including most of the 2-species and/or multiple site carcinogens, were among the structurally alerting chemicals. (b) Most of the structurally alerting chemicals were mutagenic; 84% of the carcinogens and 66% of the non-carcinogens. 100% of the 33 aromatic amino/nitro-type 2-species carcinogens were mutagenic. Thus, for structurally alerting chemicals, the Salmonella assay showed high sensitivity and low specificity (0.84 and 0.33, respectively). (c) Among the 147 non-alerting chemicals less than 5% were mutagenic, whether they were carcinogens or non-carcinogens (sensitivity 0.04).     

Classification according to chemical structure, mutagenicity to Salmonella and level of carcinogenicity of a further 42 chemicals tested for carcinogenicity by the U.S. National Toxicology Program

This paper is an extension and update of an earlier review published in this journal (Ashby and Tennant, 1988). A summary of the rodent carcinogenicity bioassay data on a further 42 chemicals tested by the U.S. National Toxicology Program (NTP) is presented. An evaluation of each chemical for structural alerts to DNA-reactivity is also provided, together with a summary of its mutagenicity to Salmonella. The 42 chemicals were numbered and evaluated as an extension of the earlier analysis of 222 NTP chemicals. The activity patterns and conclusions derived from the earlier study remain unchanged for the larger group of 264 chemicals. Based on the extended database of 264 NTP chemicals, the sensitivity of the Salmonella assay for rodent carcinogens is 58% and the specificity for the non-carcinogens is 73%. A total of 32 chemicals were defined as equivocal for carcinogenicity and, of these, 11 (34%) are mutagenic to Salmonella. An evaluation is made of instances where predictions of carcinogenicity, based on structural alerts, disagree with the Salmonella mutagenicity result (12% of the database). The majority of the disagreements are for structural alerts on non-mutagens, and that places these alerts as a sensitive primary screen with a specificity lower than that of the Salmonella assay. That analysis indicates some need for assays complementary to the Salmonella test when screening for potential genotoxic carcinogens. It also reveals that the correlation between structural alerts and mutagenicity to Salmonella is probably greater than 90%. Chemicals predicted to show Michael-type alkylating activity (i.e., CH2 = CHX; where X = an electron-withdrawing group, e.g. acrylamide) have been confirmed as a structural alert, and the halomethanes (624 are possible) have been classified as structurally-alerting. To this end an extended carcinogen-alert model structure is presented. Among the 138 NTP carcinogens now reviewed, 45 (33%) are non-mutagenic to Salmonella and possess a chemical structure that does not alert to DNA-reactivity. These carcinogens therefore either illustrate the need for complementary genetic screening tests to the Salmonella assay, or they represent the group of non-genotoxic carcinogens referred to most specifically by Weisburger and Williams (1981); the latter concept is favoured.     

An analysis by chemical class of Salmonella mutagenicity tests as predictors of animal carcinogenicity

For a number of years, investigators have recognized that humans potentially are exposed to large numbers of genotoxicants. Many efforts have attempted to validate various short-term bioassays for use as rapid, inexpensive screens for genotoxicants--especially carcinogens. In this analysis, we examine Salmonella mutagenicity as an indicator of potential carcinogenicity by comparing published (and when possible, evaluated) Salmonella results with the evaluated Gene-Tox animal carcinogen data base. The Salmonella bioassay does especially well in those cases where the level of evidence for carcinogenicity is the strongest. Analysis shows that except for specific classes of compounds, the plate-incorporation protocol and the preincubation protocol are equally efficient at detecting mutagens. This paper also demonstrates how validation values (sensitivity, specificity, etc.) vary with chemical class. Overall, this analysis demonstrates that when used and interpreted in a meaningful chemical class context, the Salmonella bioassay remains extremely useful in identifying potential animal carcinogens.     

International Commission for Protection against Environmental Mutagens and Carcinogens. ICPEMC working paper No. 5. Genotoxicity tests as predictors of carcinogens: an analysis

Differences between the results of numerical validation studies comparing in vitro and in vivo genotoxicity tests with the rodent cancer bioassay are leading to the perception that short-term tests predict carcinogenicity only with uncertainty. Consideration of factors such as the pharmacokinetic distribution of chemicals, the systems available for metabolic activation and detoxification, the ability of the active metabolite to move from the site of production to the target DNA, and the potential for expression of the induced lesions, strongly suggests that the disparate sensitivity of the different test systems is a major reason why numerical validation is not more successful. Furthermore, genotoxicity tests should be expected to detect only a subset of carcinogens, namely genotoxic carcinogens, rather than those carcinogens that appear to act by non-genetic mechanisms. Instead of relying primarily on short-term in vitro genotoxicity tests to predict carcinogenic activity, these tests should be used in a manner that emphasizes the accurate determination of mutagenicity or clastogenicity. It must then be determined whether the mutagenic activity is further expressed as carcinogenicity in the appropriate studies using test animals. The prospects for quantitative extrapolation of in vitro or in vivo genotoxicity test results to carcinogenicity requires a much more precise understanding of the critical molecular events in both processes.     

A review of the mutagenicity and rodent carcinogenicity of ambient air

Although ambient air was first shown to be carcinogenic in 1947 and mutagenic in 1975, no overarching review of the subsequent literature has been produced. Recently, Claxton et al. [L.D. Claxton, P.P. Matthews, S.H. Warren, The genotoxicity of ambient outdoor air, a review: Salmonella mutagenicity, Mutat. Res./Rev. Mutat. Res. 567 (2004) 347-399] reviewed the literature on the mutagenicity of urban air in the Salmonella mutagenicity assay. Here, we review the literature on the mutagenicity of urban air in other test systems and review the carcinogenicity of urban air in experimental systems. Urban air was carcinogenic in most of the reports involving rodents. Studies ascribed carcinogenic activity primarily to PAHs, nitroarenes, and other aromatic compounds. Atmospheric conditions, along with the levels and types of pollutants, contributed to the variations in carcinogenic and mutagenic activity of air from different metropolitan areas. The majority of the mutagenesis literature was in the Salmonella assay (50%), with plant systems accounting for most of the rest (31%). The present data give little support to the use of plant systems to compare air mutagenicity among multiple sites or studies. Studies in mice have shown that particulate air pollution causes germ-cell mutations. Air sheds contain similar types and classes of mutagens; however, the levels of these compounds vary considerably among air sheds. Combustion emissions were associated with much of the mutagenicity and carcinogenicity of urban air. Most studies focused on the particulate fraction; thus, additional work is needed on the volatile and semi-volatile fractions, metals, and atmospheric transformation. Smaller particles have greater percentages of extractable organic material and are more mutagenic than larger particles. Although hundreds of genotoxic compounds have been identified in ambient air, only a few (<25) are routinely monitored, emphasizing the value of coupling bioassay with chemistry in the monitoring of air for carcinogenic and mutagenic activities and compounds.     

A review of the genotoxicity of marketed pharmaceuticals

Information in the 1999 Physician's Desk Reference as well as from the peer-reviewed published literature was used to evaluate the genotoxicity of marketed pharmaceuticals. This survey is a compendium of genotoxicity information and a means to gain perspective on the inherent genotoxicity of structurally diverse pharmaceuticals. Data from 467 marketed drugs were collected. Excluded from analysis were anti-cancer drugs and nucleosides, which are expected to be genotoxic, steroids, biologicals and peptide-based drugs. Of the 467 drugs, 115 had no published gene-tox data. This group was comprised largely of acutely administered drugs such as antibiotics, antifungals, antihistamines decongestants and anesthetics. The remaining 352 had at least one standard gene-tox assay result. Of these, 101 compounds (28.7%) had at least one positive assay result in the pre-ICH/OECD standard four-test battery (bacterial mutagenesis, in vitro cytogenetics, mouse lymphoma assay (MLA), in vivo cytogenetics). Per assay type, the percentage of positive compounds was: bacterial mutagenesis test, 27/323 (8.3%); in vitro cytogenetics 55/222 (24.8%); MLA 24/96 (25%); in vivo cytogenetics 29/252 (11.5%). Of the supplemental genetic toxicology test findings reported, the sister chromatid exchange (SCE) assay had the largest percentage of positives 17/39 (43.5%) and mammalian mutagenesis assays (excluding MLA) had the lowest percentage of positives 2/91 (2.2%). The predictive value of genetic toxicology findings for 2-year bioassay outcomes is difficult to assess since carcinogenicity can occur via non-genotoxic mechanisms. Nevertheless, the following survey findings were made: 201 drugs had both gene-tox data and rodent carcinogenicity data. Of these, 124 were negative and 77 were equivocal or positive for carcinogenicity in at least 1 gender/1 species. Of the 124 non-carcinogens, 100 had no positive gene-tox findings. Of the remaining 24, 19 were positive in in vitro cytogenetics assays. Among the 77 compounds that exhibited equivocal or positive effects in carcinogenesis studies, 26 were positive in gene-tox assays and 51 were negative. Of the 51 negatives, 47 had multiple negative gene-tox assay results suggesting that these are probably non-genotoxic carcinogens. Statistical analyses suggested that no combination of gene-tox assays provided a higher predictivity of rodent carcinogenesis than the bacterial mutagenicity test itself.     

Mutagens that are not carcinogens: faulty theory or faulty tests?

In the National Toxicology Program database of 172 chemicals that were judged non-carcinogenic or equivocal in 2 year rodent studies in both sexes of rats and mice, there are 38 chemicals that were mutagenic in Salmonella. All but two of the chemicals had structural alerts for mutagenicity. The largest proportion of the mutagenic non-carcinogens were benzeneamines and substituted benzeneamines. In all, 12 of the mutagenic non-carcinogens had mutagenic carcinogen analogues, and for two chemicals, the carcinogenic analogues were not mutagenic. Non-carcinogens that were mutagenic in Salmonella also tended to be mutagenic and clastogenic in mammalian in vitro tests. The mutagenic responses are discussed and explanations offered for the mutagenicity and lack of carcinogenic activity of these chemicals.     

The ability of plant genotoxicity assays to predict carcinogenicity

A number of assays have been developed which use higher plants for measuring mutagenic or cytogenetic effects of chemicals, as an indication of carcinogenicity. Plant assays require less extensive equipment, materials and personnel than most other genotoxicity tests, which is a potential advantage, particularly in less developed parts of the world. We have analyzed data on 9 plant genotoxicity assays evaluated by the Gene-Tox program of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, using methodologies we have recently developed to assess the capability of assays to predict carcinogenicity and carcinogenic potency. All 9 of the plant assays appear to have high sensitivity (few false negatives). Specificity (rate of true negatives) was more difficult to evaluate because of limited testing on non-carcinogens; however, available data indicate that only the Arabidopsis mutagenicity (ArM) test appears to have high specificity. Based upon their high sensitivity, plant genotoxicity tests are most appropriate for a risk-averse testing program, because although many false positives will be generated, the relatively few negative results will be quite reliable.     

The alkaline single cell gel electrophoresis assay with mouse multiple organs: results with 30 aromatic amines evaluated by the IARC and U.S. NTP

The genotoxicity of 30 aromatic amines selected from IARC (International Agency for Research on Cancer) groups 1, 2A, 2B and 3 and from the U.S. NTP (National Toxicology Program) carcinogenicity database were evaluated using the alkaline single cell gel electrophoresis (SCG) (Comet) assay in mouse organs. We treated groups of four mice once orally at the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and sampled stomach, colon, liver, kidney, bladder, lung, brain, and bone marrow 3, 8 and 24 h after treatment. For the 20 aromatic amines that are rodent carcinogens, the assay was positive in at least one organ, suggesting a high predictive ability for the assay. For most of the SCG-positive aromatic amines, the organs exhibiting increased levels of DNA damage were not necessarily the target organs for carcinogenicity. It was rare, in contrast, for the target organs not to show DNA damage. Organ-specific genotoxicity, therefore, is necessary but not sufficient for the prediction of organ-specific carcinogenicity. For the 10 non-carcinogenic aromatic amines (eight were Ames test-positive and two were Ames test-negative), the assay was negative in all organs studied. In the safety evaluation of chemicals, it is important to demonstrate that Ames test-positive agents are not genotoxic in vivo. Chemical carcinogens can be classified as genotoxic (Ames test-positive) and putative non-genotoxic (Ames test-negative) carcinogens. The alkaline SCG assay, which detects DNA lesions, is not suitable for identifying non-genotoxic carcinogens. The present SCG study revealed a high positive response ratio for rodent genotoxic carcinogens and a high negative response ratio for rodent genotoxic non-carcinogens. These results suggest that the alkaline SCG assay can be usefully used to evaluate the in vivo genotoxicity of chemicals in multiple organs, providing for a good assessment of potential carcinogenicity.     

The detection of carcinogen-induced sperm head abnormalities in mice

The (CBA × BALB/c)F₁ male mouse is sensitive to the induction of sperm-head abnormalities after exposure to a range of chemical mutagens and carcinogens. 8 carcinogens including ethionine and diethyl stilboestrol were correctly identified. 23 non-carcinogens and compounds of unknown carcinogenicity including a range of 13 substituted anilines and methionine did not induce sperm-head abnormalities. 4-Aminophenol induced an increase in sperm-head abnormalities.The utility of the procedure for identifying genotoxic compounds is discussed.     

A review and analysis of the Chinese hamster ovary/hypoxanthine guanine phosphoribosyl transferase assay to determine the mutagenicity of chemical agents. A report of phase III of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Gene-Tox Program

Published literature on the Chinese hamster ovary cell/hypoxanthine guanine phosphoribosyl transferase (CHO/HGPRT) assay from mid-1979 through June 1986 was reviewed and evaluated. Data from the papers considered acceptable include test results on 121 chemicals belonging to 25 chemical classes. A total of 87 chemicals were evaluated positive, 3 negative, and 31 inconclusive. Mutagenicity data on 49 of the 121 chemicals evaluated could also be compared with in vivo animal carcinogenicity data. 40 of the 43 reported animal carcinogens were considered mutagenic. Caprolactam, the only definitive noncarcinogen in the group of 49, was not mutagenic. The CHO/HGPRT assay was concluded to be an appropriate assay system for use in the screening of chemicals for genotoxicity.     

Genetic toxicology: can we design predictive in vivo assays?

The present analysis examines the assumptions in, the perceptions and predictivity of and the need for short-term tests (STTs) for genotoxicity in light of recent findings that most noncarcinogens from the National Toxicology Program are genotoxic (i.e., positive in one or more in vitro STTs). Reasonable assumptions about the prevalence for carcinogens (1-10% of all chemicals), the sensitivity of these STTs (ca. 90% of all carcinogens are genotoxic) and their estimated "false positive" incidence (60-75%) imply that the majority of chemicals elicit genotoxic responses and, consequently, that most in vitro genotoxins are likely to be noncarcinogenic. Thus, either the usual treatment conditions used in these in vitro STTS are producing a large proportion of artifactual and meaningless positive results or else in vitro mutagenicity is too common a property of chemicals to serve as a useful predictor of carcinogenicity or other human risk. In contrast, the limited data base on in vivo STTs suggests that the current versions of these assays may have low sensitivity which appears unlikely to improve without dropping either their 'short-term' aspect or the rodent carcinogenicity benchmark. It is suggested that in vivo genotoxicity protocols be modified to take into consideration both the fundamentals of toxicology as well as the lessons learned from in vitro genetic toxicology. In the meantime, while in vivo assays are undergoing rigorous validation, genetic toxicology, as currently practiced, should not be a formal aspect of chemical or drug development on the grounds that it is incapable of providing realistic and reliable information on human risk. It is urged that data generated in new, unvalidated in vivo genotoxicity assays be exempted from the normal regulatory reporting requirements in order to encourage industry to participate in the laborious and expensive development of this next phase of genetic toxicology.     

Assessment of the potential germ cell mutagenicity of industrial and plant protection chemicals as part of an integrated study of genotoxicity in vitro and in vivo

An approach is described that enables the germ cell mutagenicity of chemicals to be assessed as part of an integrated assessment of genotoxic potential. It is recommended, first, that the genotoxicity of a chemical be defined by appropriate studies in vitro. This should involve use of the Salmonella mutation assay and an assay for the induction of chromosomal aberrations, but supplementary assays may be indicated in specific instances. If negative results are obtained from these 2 tests there is no need for the conduct of additional tests. Agents considered to be genotoxic in vitro should then be assessed for genotoxicity to rodents. This will usually involve the conduct of a bone marrow cytogenetic assay, and in the case of negative results, a genotoxicity test in an independent tissue. Agents found to be non-genotoxic in vivo are regarded as having no potential for germ cell mutagenicity. Agents found to be genotoxic in vivo may either be assumed to have potential as germ cell mutagens, or their status in this respect may be defined by appropriate germ cell mutagenicity studies. The basis of the approach, which is supported by the available experimental data, is that germ cell mutagens will be evident as somatic cell genotoxins in vivo, and that these will be detected as genotoxins in vitro given appropriate experimentation. The conduct of appropriate and adequate studies is suggested to be of more value than the conduct of a rigid set of prescribed tests.     

The genetic toxicity of human carcinogens and its implications

23 chemicals and chemical combinations have been designated by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) as causally associated with cancer in humans. The literature was searched for reports of their activity in the Salmonella mutagenicity assay and for evidence of their ability to induce chromosome aberrations or micronuclei in the bone marrow of mice or rats. In addition, the chemical structures of these carcinogens were assessed for the presence of electrophilic substituents that might be associated with their mutagenicity and carcinogenicity. The purpose of this study was to determine which human carcinogens exhibit genetic toxicity in vitro and in vivo and to what extent they can be detected using these two widely employed short-term tests for genetic toxicity. The results of this study revealed 20 of the 23 carcinogens to be active in one or both short-term tests. Treosulphan, for which short-term test results are not available, is predicted to be active based on its structure. The remaining two agents, asbestos and conjugated estrogens, are not mutagenic to Salmonella; asbestos is not likely to induce cytogenetic effects in the bone marrow and the potential activity of conjugated estrogens in the bone marrow is difficult to anticipate. These findings show that genetic toxicity is characteristic of the majority of IARC Group 1 human carcinogens. If these chemicals are considered representative of human carcinogens, then two short-term tests may serve as an effective primary screen for chemicals that present a carcinogenic hazard to humans.     

Mutagenicity of 43 structurally related heterocyclic compounds and its relationship to their carcinogenicity.

43 heteropolycyclic compounds belonging to a homologous series were investigated for mutagenicity. The results are compared with carcinogenicity data obtained with the same batches of compounds under conditions identical for all of them. Mutagenicity was tested in the Ames test with Salmonella typhimurium strains TA1535, TA1537 and TA100 in the presence and absence of liver 10 000 g supernatant from rats treated with Aroclor 1254. Carcinogenicity was tested by injection of the compounds into subcutaneous tissue of XVIInc/Z mice. 18 test compounds showed carcinogenic activity, some strongly, others only weakly. Of these, 17 were detected as mutagens: one weak carcinogen did not revert the Salmonella strains. No quantitative correlation was observed between the extents of the mutagenic and the carcinogenic effects. Of the 25 substances that did not produce tumours, 13 showed mutagenicity (12 in the presence, 2 in the absence, of the liver homogenate). The mutagenic effects of these compounds were quantitatively similar to those of the compounds that produced tumours. The most sensitive strain of Salmonella typhimurium was TA100. It detected all 30 mutagens. TA98 was mutated by 25 compounds, TA1537 by 16 compounds. No mutagenic effects were seen with TA1535. Possible reasons for the high percentage of apparently "false positives" in the Ames test and the lack of a quantitative correlation between the potency of the mutagenic and carcinogenic effects are discussed. It is suggested that the complexity of the metabolism of these heterocyclic compounds may lead to critical differences in metabolism in mouse subcutaneous tissue in vivo and in liver homogenates from rats treated with Aroclor. Therefore the present study will be extended to life-long oral and intrahepatic carcinogenicity tests leading to a higher proportion of metabolism in the liver.     

Chromosomal aberrations and micronuclei induced in rat and mouse bone marrow cells by sodium nitrate

The genotoxicity of several anthraquinone compounds metabolically related to aflatoxin B1 was examined by means of the hepatocyte primary culture (HPC)/DNA repair test and the Salmonella microsome mutagenesis test, and compared to versicolorins A and B which are potent mutagenic and genotoxic intermediates of the aflatoxin biosynthetic pathway. 6,8-O-Dimethyl-versicolorins A, B and 6-deoxyversicolorin A were found to be strongly mutagenic and genotoxic. Genotoxicity of versicolorin A and 6,8-O-dimethylversicolorin A was stronger than that of versicolorin B and 6,8-O-dimethylversicolorin B, respectively, in the HPC/DNA repair test. Nidurufin and norsolorinic acid, which do not possess a bisfuran ring, exhibited questionable activities for mutagenicity and no genotoxicity. It is suspected that 6,8-O-dimethylversicolorins A, B and 6-deoxyversicolorin A as well as versicolorins A and B are genotoxic carcinogens.     

Genotoxicity of epoxy resin hardeners in the hepatocyte primary culture/DNA repair test

The genotoxicity of 9 chemicals used as epoxy resin hardeners was examined in the DNA repair test with rat hepatocytes. DNA repair synthesis was elicited by 7 chemicals, i.e., 4-aminodiphenyl ether, 4,4-diaminodiphenyl ether, 3,4,4′-triaminodiphenyl ether, 3,3′-dichloro-4,4′-diaminodiphenyl ether, 1,3-phenylenedi-4-aminophenyl ether, 4,4′-diaminodiphenyl methane and 4,4′-methylene-bis(2-chloroaniline).The positive results obtained with 4 epoxy resin hardeners of unknown carcinogenicity, i.e., 4-aminodiphenyl ether, 3,4,4′-triaminodiphenyl ether, 3,3′-dichloro-4,4′-diaminodiphenyl ether and 1,3-phenylene-di-4-aminophenyl ether suggest that they may be carcinogens. The genotoxicity of 1,4-phenylene-di-4-aminophenyl ether, of unknown carcinogenicity, and 4,4′-diaminodiphenyl sulfone, for which there is no sound proof of carcinogenicity, was not confirmed in the DNA repair test. The result with 4,4′-diaminodiphenyl sulfone was in agreement with its lack of mutagenicity in Salmonella typhimurium.     

Carcinogenicity of the aromatic amines: from structure-activity relationships to mechanisms of action and risk assessment

Aromatic amines represent one of the most important classes of industrial and environmental chemicals: many of them have been reported to be powerful carcinogens and mutagens, and/or hemotoxicants. Their toxicity has been studied also with quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) methods: these studies are potentially suitable for investigating mechanisms of action and for estimating the toxicity of compounds lacking experimental determinations. In this paper, we first summarized the QSAR models for the rodent carcinogenicity of the aromatic amines. The gradation of potency of the carcinogenic amines depended firstly on their hydrophobicity, and secondly on electronic (reactivity, propensity to be metabolically transformed) and steric properties. On the contrary, the difference between carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic aromatic amines depended mainly on electronic and steric properties. These QSARs can be used directly for estimating the carcinogenicity of aromatic amines. A two-step prediction is possible: (1) estimation of yes/no activity; (2) if the answer from step 1 is yes, then prediction of the degree of potency. The QSARs for rodent carcinogenicity were put in a wider context by comparing them with those for: (a) Salmonella mutagenicity; (b) general toxicity; (c) enzymatic reactions; (d) physical-chemical reactions. This comparative QSAR exercise generated a coherent global picture of the action mechanisms of the aromatic amines. The QSARs for carcinogenicity were similar to those for Salmonella mutagenicity, thus pointing to a similar mechanism of action. On the contrary, the general toxicity QSARs (both in vitro and in vivo systems) were mostly based on hydrophobicity, pointing to an aspecific mechanism of action much simpler than that for carcinogenicity and mutagenicity. The oxidation of the amines (first step in the main metabolic pathway leading to carcinogenic and mutagenic species) had identical QSARs in both enzymatic and physical-chemical systems, thus providing evidence for the link between simple chemical reactions and those in biological systems. The results show that it is possible to generate mechanistically and statistically sound QSAR models for rodent carcinogenicity, and indirectly that the rodent bioassay is a reliable source of good quality data.     

Mutagenicity of aliphatic nitrosamines in Salmonella typhimurium.

25 aliphatic nitrosamines were examined in the Ames assay for bacterial mutagens, using rat liver "S-9" for activation. Of them, 8 carcinogens were mutagenic and 5 non-carcinogens were not mutagenic. However, 2 compounds not carcinogenic in rats were mutagenic and 9 carcinogens were not mutagenic, including 6 that are liver carcinogens in rats.     

Genotoxicity of quinone pigments from pathogenic fungi

The genotoxicity and mutagenicity of several kinds of quinone pigments from pathogenic fungi were examined by means of the hepatocyte primary culture (HPC)/DNA repair test and of Ames test with TA98 and TA100. Clear genotoxicity of the two quinone chemicals, xanthomegnin and luteosporin were observed in the HPC/DNA repair test, though definite mutagenicity was not detected in the Salmonella microsome test. These two pigments are thus suspected to be genotoxic carcinogens.